Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “ANTICOAGULANTS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2000

Anticoagulants for preventing recurrence following ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack.

BACKGROUND: After a first stroke, further vascular events (especially myocardial infarction and recurrent stroke) are common and often fatal. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to assess the effect of prolonged anticoagulant therapy following presumed non-embolic ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group trials register. We contacted companies marketing anticoagulant agents. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials comparing anticoagulant therapy, for at least one month, with control in people with previous non-embolic presumed ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently selected trials for inclusion, assessed trial quality and extracted the data. MAIN RESULTS: Nine trials involving 1214 patients were included. The quality of all trials was poor. All pre-dated routine computerised tomography scanning and use of the International Normalised Ratio to monitor anticoagulation. Anticoagulant therapy did not significantly reduce the odds of death or dependency (two trials, odds ratio 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.52 to 1.34). Death from any cause (odds ratio 0.95, 95% confidence interval 0.72 to 1.23), and death from vascular causes (odds ratio 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.66 to 1.13) were not significantly different between treatment and control across all nine trials. Anticoagulant therapy did not reduce the risk of recurrent stroke (odds ratio 0.79, 95% confidence interval 0.56 to 1.13). However, fatal intracranial haemorrhage increased (odds ratio 2.54, 95% confidence interval 1.19 to 5.45), as did major extracranial haemorrhage (odds ratio 4.87, 95% confidence interval 2.50 to 9.49). This means anticoagulant therapy caused 11 additional fatal intracranial haemorrhages and 25 additional major extracranial haemorrhages per year for every 1000 patients given anticoagulant therapy. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be no clear benefit from long-term anticoagulant therapy in people with non-embolic presumed ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack. There appears to be a significant bleeding risk associated with anticoagulant therapy.

Anticoagulants↗
PubMed2006

Quality of anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin plus phenprocoumon for the prevention of thromboembolic complications in cardioversion for non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Sub-analysis from the Anticoagulation in Cardioversion using Enoxaparin (ACE) trial.

INTRODUCTION: Anticoagulation in cardioversion for atrial fibrillation is performed using unfractionated heparin and oral anticoagulants. TEE-guided cardioversion, after achievement of therapeutic anticoagulation (1-3 days), may be an alternative to the traditional procedure (3-week anticoagulation followed by cardioversion). The quality of anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation has not been investigated in a randomised trial with TEE-guided cardioversion. We analysed respective data from the ACE trial on the quality of conventional anticoagulation, where most participating centres chose the TEE-guided approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a randomised, prospective, multicentre trial, we analysed the efficacy of unfractionated heparin plus phenprocoumon in 248 patients on an intention-to-treat basis. There were 2373 evaluable anticoagulation measurements (out of 2925 measurements) and 4 categories of anticoagulation quality (under-, target, over- and severe over-anticoagulation). Of patients with evaluable measurements, 88% received short-term anticoagulation (4 weeks) in TEE-guided cardioversion. RESULTS: The median time to achieve therapeutic anticoagulation (aPTT> or =60 and <80 s or INR> or =2 and <3) was 3 days. Anticoagulation values were out of therapeutic range in 69.5% of measurements during 4- or 7-week follow-up, and never within therapeutic range in 10% of patients. Of the 15 primary endpoints observed (death, thromboembolism and major bleeding complications), only 3 were in patients with anticoagulation measurements within therapeutic range. CONCLUSIONS: In this study setting, with predominance of 4 weeks anticoagulation in TEE-guided cardioversion for atrial fibrillation, therapeutic anticoagulation was reached within 3 days using conventional anticoagulation. Despite careful dose adjustments, anticoagulation was out of therapeutic range in almost 70% of total measurements and 80% of primary endpoints.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Levels of vitamin K-dependent procoagulant and anticoagulant proteins in over-anticoagulated patients.

Coumarin anticoagulants impair the biological activity of the vitamin K-dependent procoagulant and anticoagulant proteins. There are no reports that focus on the levels of these proteins in over-anticoagulated patients. Therefore, we determined the levels of factor II, factor VII, factor IX and factor X, protein C and protein S in 25 randomly selected over-anticoagulated patients (International Normalized Ratio >/= 6.0) and in 25 matched, therapeutically anticoagulated patients with an International Normalized Ratio within the therapeutic zone. Furthermore, to study a possible effect of the cause of over-anticoagulation, coagulant levels were compared between 16 over-anticoagulated patients with fever in the preceding 2 weeks and 24 over-anticoagulated patients with stable congestive heart failure. The pattern of procoagulant level reductions in the three groups of over-anticoagulated patients was largely the same as in therapeutically anticoagulated patients: factor X was the lowest and factor IX the highest. The difference was that, in over-anticoagulated patients, factor VII was relatively low among the procoagulant factors compared with therapeutically anticoagulated patients. Protein C was lower than protein S in over-anticoagulated patients with congestive heart failure, but was similar to protein S in the other study groups. In over-anticoagulated patients with fever, the vitamin K-dependent coagulation proteins except factor X were significantly lower than in over-anticoagulated patients with congestive heart failure, especially factor VII and protein S.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Comparing the quality of oral anticoagulant management by anticoagulation clinics and by family physicians: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence that better outcomes are achieved when anticoagulation is managed by anticoagulation clinics rather than by family physicians. We carried out a randomized controlled trial to evaluate these 2 models of anticoagulant care. METHODS: We randomly allocated patients who were expected to require warfarin sodium for 3 months either to anticoagulation clinics located in 3 Canadian tertiary hospitals or to their family physician practices. We evaluated the quality of oral anticoagulant management by comparing the proportion of time that the international normalized ratio (INR) of patients receiving warfarin sodium was within the target therapeutic range +/- 0.2 INR units (expanded therapeutic range) while they were managed in anticoagulation clinics as opposed to family physicians' care over 3 months. We measured the rates of thromboembolic and major hemorrhagic events and patient satisfaction in the 2 groups. RESULTS: Of the 221 patients enrolled, 112 were randomly assigned to anticoagulation clinics and 109 to family physicians. The INR values of patients who were managed by anticoagulation clinics were within the expanded therapeutic range 82% of the time versus 76% of the time for those managed by family physicians (p = 0.034). High-risk INR values (defined as being < 1.5 or > 5.0) were more commonly observed in patients managed by family physicians (40%) than in patients managed by anticoagulation clinics (30%, p = 0.005). More INR measurements were performed by family physicians than by anticoagulation clinics (13 v. 11, p = 0.001). Major bleeding events (2 [2%] v. 1 [1%]), thromboembolic events (1 [1%] v. 2 [2%]) and deaths (5 [4%] v. 6 [6%]) occurred at a similar frequency in the anticoagulation clinic and family physician groups respectively. Of the 170 (77%) patients who completed the patient satisfaction questionnaire, more were satisfied when their anticoagulant management was managed through anticoagulation clinics than by their family physicians (p = 0.001). INTERPRETATION: Anticoagulation clinics provided better oral anticoagulant management than family physicians, but the differences were relatively modest.

Ambulatory Care Facilities↗
PubMed2007

Descriptive analysis of the process and quality of oral anticoagulation management in real-life practice in patients with chronic non-valvular atrial fibrillation: the international study of anticoagulation management (ISAM).

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Expert oral anticoagulation management is the key to good outcomes and is performed variably in different health care systems throughout the world. We set out to assess the quality of anticoagulation management in five countries in patients receiving vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for stroke prophylaxis in chronic non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), and to compare the anticoagulation management practices in these countries. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a retrospective, multi-centre cohort study in the United States, Canada, France, Italy, and Spain. About 1,511 patients were randomly recruited from representative practices (routine medical care (RMC) in the US, Canada, and France; anticoagulation clinics in Italy and Spain) and data pertaining to their oral anticoagulation care were abstracted from their medical records. The predominant anticoagulant in use was warfarin in the US, Canada, and Italy; acenocoumarol in Spain; and fluindione in France. Documentation of care was poor in the US, Canada, and France, countries where RMC was studied. Percent INRs or time-in-therapeutic range was greater in the two anticoagulation clinic samples compared with the RMC samples. CONCLUSION: Oral anticoagulation care varies considerably from country to country. Findings suggest that anticoagulation clinic care (ACC) may provide better outcomes as assessed by international normalized ratio (INR) time-in-range. Physicians tend to under treat more than over treat. Finally, documentation of care is often inadequate. Condensed Abstract Oral anticoagulation management (routine medical care or anticoagulation clinic care) was retrospectively assessed in 5 countries using a uniform, structured assessment tool. Major management differences were detected, especially between anticoagulation clinic care and routine care. Documentation was often a problem in the latter setting. Less time in therapeutic INR range was noted in routine medical care. Findings suggest that anticoagulation clinic care may provide better outcomes as assessed by international normalized ratio (INR) time-in-range. Physicians tend to under treat more than over treat. Finally, documentation of care is often inadequate.

Acenocoumarol↗
PubMed2001

Anticoagulants (heparin, low molecular weight heparin and oral anticoagulants) for intermittent claudication.

BACKGROUND: Anticoagulant treatment for intermittent claudication might improve functional capacity, and prevent acute cardiovascular complications caused by peripheral obstructive arterial disease. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of anticoagulant drugs (heparin, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and oral anticoagulants) in patients with intermittent claudication (Fontaine stage II) in terms of improving walking capacity (pain-free walking distance or absolute walking distance), mortality, cardiovascular events, ankle/brachial pressure index, progression to surgery, amputation-free survival and side effects of these drugs. SEARCH STRATEGY: Randomised trials of anticoagulants for intermittent claudication were sought using the search strategy described by the Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Review Group. Additional trials were sought through: reference lists resulting from this search; recent conference proceedings; contact with authors of published trials and pharmaceutical companies producing anticoagulants. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised trials of anticoagulants used to treat patients with intermittent claudication. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Thirteen trials were initially considered eligible for inclusion in the review. Two studies evaluated oral anticoagulants, five evaluated standard heparin, and six evaluated LMWHs. Only three studies (two evaluating oral anticoagulants, one evaluating heparin) met the high quality methodological inclusion criteria and were included in the primary analysis. Four other studies were included in the sensitivity analysis. The reviewers extracted the data independently. MAIN RESULTS: No significant difference was observed between heparin treatment and control groups for pain-free walking distance or maximum walking distance at the end of treatment. There were no data to indicate that LMWHs benefit walking distance. Revascularisation or amputation-free survival rates were reported in one study only with a five year follow-up. No study reported a significant effect on overall mortality or cardiovascular events and the pooled odds ratios were not significant for these outcomes either. Major and minor bleeding events were significantly more frequent in the group treated with oral anticoagulants compared to control, with a non-significant increase in fatal bleeding events. No major bleeding events were reported in the study evaluating heparin, while a non-significant increase in minor bleeding events was reported. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: No benefit of heparin, LMWHs or oral anticoagulants has been established for intermittent claudication. An increased risk of major bleeding events has been observed especially with oral anticoagulants. The use of anticoagulants for intermittent claudication cannot be recommended at this stage.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2000

Oral anticoagulation self-management and management by a specialist anticoagulation clinic: a randomised cross-over comparison.

BACKGROUND: Vitamin K antagonist treatment is effective for prevention and treatment of thromboembolic events but frequent laboratory control and dose-adjustment are essential. Small portable devices have enabled patient self-monitoring of anticoagulation and self-adjustment of the dose. We compared this self-management of oral anticoagulant therapy with conventional management by a specialist anticoagulation clinic in a randomised cross-over study. METHODS: 50 patients on long-term oral anticoagulant treatment were included in a randomised controlled crossover study. Patients were self-managed or were managed by the anticoagulation clinic for a period of 3 months. After this period the alternative strategy was followed for each patient. Prothrombin time (expressed as international normalised ratio [INR]) were measured at intervals of 1-2 weeks in both periods without knowledge of type of management. The primary endpoint was the number of measurements within the therapeutic range (therapeutic target value +/-50.5 INR units). FINDINGS: There was no significant difference in the overall quality of control of anticoagulation between the two study periods. Patients were for 55% and for 49% of the treatment period within a range of +/-0.5 from the therapeutic target INR during self-management and anticoagulation clinic management, respectively (p=0.06). The proportion of patients who spent most time in the therapeutic target range was larger during self-management than during anticoagulation clinic-guided management. The odds ratio for a better control of anticoagulation (defined as the period of time in the therapeutic target range) during self-management compared with anticoagulation clinic-guided management was 4.6 (95% CI 2.1-10.2). A patient-satisfaction assessment showed superiority of self-management over conventional care. INTERPRETATION: Self-management of INR in the population in this study is feasible and appears to result in control of anticoagulation that is at least equivalent to management by a specialist anticoagulation clinic. It is also better appreciated by patients. Larger studies are required to assess the effect of this novel management strategy on the incidence of thromboembolic or bleeding complications.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2004

Evaluation of the phospholipid-rich dilute Russell's viper venom assay to monitor oral anticoagulation in patients with lupus anticoagulant.

The International Normalized Ratio (INR) is generally recommended to monitor anticoagulant therapy in patients treated with warfarin. However, there has been concern about the validity of the INR to monitor warfarin therapy in patients with lupus anticoagulant, particularly when there is prolongation of the baseline INR. An alternative approach is to use a chromogenic factor X assay that is not sensitive to lupus anticoagulant. However, this assay is expensive, not widely available, and does not have an established therapeutic range. We hypothesized that the phospholipid-rich dilute Russell viper venom time (prdRVVT), a simple, rapid and inexpensive assay, might be suitable to monitor warfarin therapy in this situation since Russell's viper venom directly activates coagulation factor X while the phospholipid in the reagent reduces or negates any effect of lupus anticoagulant on the assay. We measured the INR, chromogenic factor X, and prdRVVT in 50 patients stabilized on warfarin for at least 6 weeks, 12 of whom had lupus anticoagulant, and 37 patients not taking warfarin, 17 of whom had lupus anticoagulant. Factor X was negatively correlated with INR in anticoagulated patients both in the absence (r = -0.45, P = 0.01) and presence (r = -0.43, P = 0.17) of lupus anticoagulant. The prdRVVT was also strongly correlated with INR in anticoagulated patients without lupus anticoagulant (r = 0.60, P < 0.0001) but there was no correlation in the presence of lupus anticoagulant (r = -0.13, P = 0.68). Our results suggest that the prdRVVT is not suitable for monitoring warfarin therapy in patients with lupus anticoagulant.

Anticoagulants↗
PubMed1997

Consensus guidelines for coordinated outpatient oral anticoagulation therapy management. Anticoagulation Guidelines Task Force.

OBJECTIVE: To provide primary and referring healthcare practitioners with guidelines for the provision of safe and effective anticoagulation management in any venue to standardize and improve quality of care and to permit negotiation for reimbursement from third-party payers. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data on the current practice of anticoagulation providers and outcomes related to anticoagulation clinic care were obtained through the literature, interviews with anticoagulation providers, and a focus group meeting of anticoagulation clinic stakeholders. This information collation process revealed that an anticoagulation service consists of three separate areas for which guidelines should be developed. Based on the consensus opinions of the committee members, the literature review, and the current practice of anticoagulation services providers, a draft guideline was developed and reviewed by an independent multidisciplinary panel of anticoagulation services providers whose comments were incorporated into the final guideline. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic outpatient anticoagulation services are systems of care designed to coordinate and optimize the delivery of anticoagulation therapy by (1) evaluating patient-specific risks and benefits to determine the appropriateness of therapy; (2) facilitating the management of anticoagulation dosages and prescription pick up or delivery; (3) providing ongoing education of the patient and other caregivers about warfarin and the importance of self-care behavior leading to optimal outcomes; (4) providing continuous systematic monitoring of patients, international normalized ratio results, diet, concomitant drug therapy, and disease states; and (5) communicating with other healthcare practitioners involved in the care of the patient. To create a reproducible framework for the provision of these services, guidelines for structure, process, and outcomes of coordinated outpatient anticoagulation management services were developed. Guidelines for organization and management include (1) qualifications for personnel, (2) supervision, (3) care management and coordination, (4) communication and documentation, and (5) laboratory monitoring. Guidelines for the process of patient care include (6) patient selection and assessment, (7) initiation of therapy, (8) maintenance and management of therapy, (9) patient education, and (10) management and triage of therapy-related and unrelated problems. Guidelines for the evaluation of patient outcomes include (11) organizational components and (12) patient outcomes. The impact of these 12 guidelines on patient care and reimbursement procurement will depend on their implementation and the perceived value of their use.

Ambulatory Care↗
PubMed2002

Improving the quality of anticoagulation of patients with atrial fibrillation in managed care organizations: results of the managing anticoagulation services trial.

Randomized trials have indicated that well-managed anticoagulation with warfarin could prevent more than half of the strokes related to atrial fibrillation. However, many patients with atrial fibrillation who are eligible for this therapy either do not receive it or are not maintained within an optimal prothrombin time-international normalized ratio (INR) range. We sought to determine whether an anticoagulation service within a managed care organization would be a feasible alternative for providing anticoagulation care. We performed a multi-site randomized trial in six large managed care organizations in the United States. Subjects were aged 65 years or older and had nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. At each site, physician practices were divided into two geographically defined practice clusters; each site was randomly assigned to have one intervention and one control cluster. The intervention cluster received an anticoagulation service that satisfied specifications for high-quality anticoagulation care and was coordinated through the managed care organization. Control clusters continued with their usual provider-based care. We measured the proportion of time that warfarin-treated patients in each of the clusters (intervention and control) were in the target range for the INR at baseline, and again during a follow-up period. Five of the six selected sites succeeded at developing an anticoagulation service. Patients in the intervention and control clusters had similar demographic characteristics, contraindications to warfarin, and risk factors for stroke. Among patients (n = 144 in the intervention clusters; n = 118 in the control clusters) for whom data were available during the baseline and follow-up periods, the changes in percentages of time in the target range were similar for those in the intervention clusters (baseline: 47.7%; follow-up: 55.6%) and in the control clusters (baseline: 49.1%; follow-up: 52.3%; intervention effect: 5%; 95% confidence interval: -5% to 14%; P = 0.32). Although it was feasible in a managed care organization to implement anticoagulation services that were tailored to local circumstances, provision of this service did not improve anticoagulation care compared with usual care. The effect of the anticoagulation service was limited by the utilization of the service, the degree to which the referring physician supports strict adherence to recommended target ranges for the INR, and the ability of the anticoagulation service to identify and to respond to out-of-range values promptly.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Low frequency of elevated prothrombin times in patients with lupus anticoagulants when using a recombinant thromboplastin reagent: implications for dosing and monitoring of oral anticoagulant therapy.

Many patients with lupus anticoagulants (LA) are treated with oral anticoagulation and monitored using the international normalised ratio (INR) derived from the prothrombin time (PT). Recent reports have produced conflicting conclusions about the extent to which LA interferes with PT determination. The degree of anticoagulation may be overestimated in a patient whose LA affects the PT. A number of reports conclude that specific thromboplastin reagents containing recombinant tissue factor are sensitive to the presence of LAs and should not be used to monitor oral anticoagulant therapy in these patients. These studies were performed on orally anticoagulated patients. The present retrospective study on 400 patients with LAs who were not receiving therapeutic anticoagulation was performed to ascertain the frequency of prolonged PT in these patients when using Innovin recombinant thromboplastin. Only 17 (4.3%) out of 400 had prolonged PT in the presence of LA. As this is a low prevalence, and not all patients with LAs will require anticoagulant therapy, it is concluded that baseline INR determination should be used to highlight the need to monitor individual patients with LA-insensitive reagents. As the use of moderate-intensity oral anticoagulation for patients with LAs and previous thrombosis is receiving wider acceptance, an informed approach to anticoagulant monitoring will reduce the possibility of under-anticoagulating patients receiving this therapy.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2005

Effect of a centralized clinical pharmacy anticoagulation service on the outcomes of anticoagulation therapy.

CONTEXT: A growing body of reports has documented the ability of anticoagulation management services to help patients receiving warfarin therapy achieve better outcomes compared to the care provided by their personal physicians (ie, usual care). OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical outcomes associated with anticoagulation therapy provided by a clinical pharmacy anticoagulation service (CPAS) to usual care. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational cohort study, 6 months in duration. SETTING: Large nonprofit, group-model health maintenance organization. PATIENTS: A total of 6,645 patients receiving warfarin therapy were included in the final analyses (intervention group, 3,323 patients; control group, 3,322 patients). INTERVENTION: Anticoagulation therapy for patients in the intervention group was managed by a centralized, telephonic CPAS. Therapy for patients in the control group was managed in the usual manner by their personal physicians. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the occurrence of anticoagulation therapy-related complications. A secondary outcome was the proportion of time spent in the target international normalized ratio (INR) range for each patient. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to examine the risk of complications in relation to the study group. RESULTS: Patients in the CPAS were 39% less likely to experience an anticoagulation therapy-related complication than were patients in the control group (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.42 to 0.88). The number of patients needed to treat to prevent an anticoagulation therapy complication was 52. Additional analyses revealed that improved outcomes associated with CPAS were mediated largely through improved therapeutic INR control. Patients in the CPAS group spent 63.5% of study period days within their target INR range compared to 55.2% in the control group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A centralized, telephonic, pharmacist-managed anticoagulation monitoring service reduced the risk of anticoagulation therapy-related complications compared to that with usual care. The cumulative evidence supporting the superior care associated with implementing a pharmacist-managed anticoagulation monitoring service was sufficient to recommend widespread implementation.

Aged↗
PubMed1986

Relationship between protein C antigen and anticoagulant activity during oral anticoagulation and in selected disease states.

Protein C is a natural vitamin K-dependent plasma anticoagulant, deficiencies of which have been found in patients with recurrent thrombosis and warfarin-induced skin necrosis. To appreciate more fully the role of protein C in disease states and during oral anticoagulation, a new functional assay for protein C involving adsorption of plasma protein C on a Ca+2-dependent monoclonal antibody, elution, quantitative activation, and assessment of plasma anticoagulant activity, has been developed. When oral anticoagulation is initiated, the anticoagulant activity of protein C decreases to a greater extent than either the amidolytic or immunologic levels. During stabilized warfarin treatment, there is no correlation between either amidolytic or antigenic levels and the functional protein C activity, suggesting that measurement of protein C anticoagulant activity may be necessary to reflect adequately the anticoagulant protection afforded by this protein. In contrast, there was a strong correlation between anticoagulant and amidolytic and immunologic levels in liver failure and disseminated intravascular coagulation. Two patients with thromboembolic disease have been identified who exhibit a marked decrease in anticoagulant activity, but who have normal immunologic and amidolytic levels. Thus, this assay permits assessment of protein C in individuals who have received anticoagulant treatment and identification of a new class of protein C-deficient individuals.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Bleeding complications of oral anticoagulant treatment: an inception-cohort, prospective collaborative study (ISCOAT). Italian Study on Complications of Oral Anticoagulant Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Bleeding is the most serious complication of the use of oral anticoagulation in the prevention and treatment of thromoboembolic complications. We studied the frequency of bleeding complications in outpatients treated routinely in anticoagulation clinics. METHODS: In a prospective cohort from thirty-four Italian anticoagulation clinics, 2745 consecutive patients were studied from the start of their oral anticoagulation (warfarin in 64%, acenocourmarol in the rest). The target anticoagulation-intensity was low (international normalised ratio [INR] < or = 2.8) in 71% of the patients and high (> 2.8) in the remainder. We recorded demographic details and the main indication for treatment and, every 3-4 months, INR and outcome events. Such events included all complications (bleeding, thrombosis, other), although only bleeding events are reported here, and deaths. We divided bleeding into major and minor categories. FINDINGS: 43% of the patients were women. Nearly three-fifths of the patients were aged 60-79; 8% were over 80. The main indication for treatment was venous thrombolism (33%), followed by non-ischaemic heart disease (17%). Mean follow-up was 267 days. Over 2011 patient-years of follow-up, 153 bleeding complications occurred (7.6 per 100 patient-years). 5 were fatal (all cerebral haemorrhages, 0.25 per 100 patient-years), 23 were major (1.1), and 125 were minor (6.2). The rate of events was similar between sexes, coumarin type, size of enrolling centre, and target INR. The rate was higher in older patients: 10.5 per 100 patient-years in those aged 70 or over, 6.0 in those aged under 70 (relative risk 1.75, 95% Cl 1.29-2.39, p < 0.001). The rate was also higher when the indication was peripheral and/or cerebrovascular disease than venous thromboembolism plus other indications (12.5 vs 6.0 per 100 patient-years) (1.80, 1.2-2.7, p < 0.01), and during the first 90 days of treatment compared with later (11.0 vs 6.3, 1.75, 1.27-2.44, p < 0.001). A fifth of the bleeding events occurred at low anticoagulation intensity (INR < 2, rate 7.7 per 100 patient-years of follow-up). The rates were 4.8, 9.5, 40.5, and 200 at INRs 2.0-2.9, 3-4.4, 4.5-6.9, and over 7, respectively (relative risks for INR > 4.5, 7.91, 5.44-11.5, p < 0.0001). INTERPRETATION: We saw fewer bleeding events than those recorded in other observational and experimental studies. Oral anticoagulation has become safer in recent years, especially if monitored in anticoagulation clinics. Caution is required in elderly patients and anticoagulation intensity should be closely monitored to reduce periods of overdosing.

Acenocoumarol↗
PubMed2005

Bridging anticoagulation with low-molecular-weight heparin after interruption of warfarin therapy is associated with a residual anticoagulant effect prior to surgery.

Bridging anticoagulation with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is common in patients who require temporary interruption of warfarin before surgery or a procedure, but whether such patients have a residual anticoagulant effect just before a procedure is not known. Consecutive patients who received bridging anticoagulation with LMWH had anti-Xa levels measured just before a procedure. The proportion of patients with a residual anticoagulant effect, defined as an anti-Xa level > or = 0.10 IU/ml, was determined. Multivariable regression analysis identified predictors of a residual anticoagulant effect, expressed as an odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). A pre-procedure residual anticoagulant effect was detected in 12 of 73 (16%) patients overall, in 11 of 37 (30%) patients who received therapeutic-dose LMWH, and in 1 of 36 patients (3%) who received low-dose LMWH. Receiving therapeutic-dose LMWH (OR = 118.8; 95% CI: 5.8, 999.9), and increasing age (OR = 4.0; 95% CI: 1.3, 12.5) were predictors of a residual pre-procedure anticoagulant effect. In patients who require bridging anticoagulation with LMWH, a residual anticoagulant effect from LMWH is detected in 1 of 6 patients, and receiving therapeutic-dose LMWH is the strongest predictor of such an effect.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2006

Outcomes of oral anticoagulant therapy managed by telephone vs in-office visits in an anticoagulation clinic setting.

BACKGROUND: Anticoagulation management by a dedicated anticoagulation clinic improves patient outcomes compared to routine medical care. Telephone-based anticoagulation management has been described but has not been compared to management with traditional office-based visits. The objective of this study was to compare warfarin-related monitoring outcomes, clinical end points, and the use of health-care resources as a result of warfarin-related complications in anticoagulation clinic patients whose management was conducted by telephone or in-office-based visits. SETTING: Two university-affiliated anticoagulation clinics in Seattle, WA, and Chicago, IL. METHODS: A retrospective, observational cohort design was used to investigate anticoagulation clinic patients who were managed by telephone encounters compared to those managed during face-to-face in-office encounters. RESULTS: A total of 234 patients were evaluated; 117 patients managed by telephone were compared to 117 patients managed in office-based clinic visits. Monitoring outcomes (ie, time in therapeutic range and clinic visits per patient-year) were similar between groups. Differences in major bleeding (5.67% vs 5.62% per patient-year, respectively) and thromboembolic events (1.42% vs 2.81% per patient-year, respectively) between telephone-managed and face-to-face-managed patients did not reach statistical significance. The same was true for differences in the frequency of emergency department visits and hospital admissions to manage complications of warfarin therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Telephone-based management of oral anticoagulation through a pharmacist-staffed anticoagulation clinic yielded clinical outcomes that were at least as favorable as those associated with traditional office-based visits. Telephone follow-up can be successfully used to manage warfarin therapy in patients who are unable to present in person to an anticoagulation clinic.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2005

[Monitoring therapy with oral anticoagulants. Anticoagulation clinics vs assistant physician].

Most patients on chronic oral anticoagulant therapy are monitored through anticoagulation clinics, or rather by assistant physicians. Our aim was to compare warfarin anticoagulated patients who were treated with usual medical care (assistant physician) with those treated routinely at an anticoagulation clinic for anticoagulation control. The later was assessed by comparing in both groups of patients the proportion of INRs within the therapeutic range, above 5.0 and below 1.5. The group treated at an anticoagulation clinic achieved better anticoagulation control (both among the patients receiving lower-range anticoagulation therapy and in the patients requiring higher-range anticoagulation therapy) than the group treated with usual medical care.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1997

[Hemorrhagic complications of oral anticoagulant therapy: results of a prospective multicenter study ISCOAT (Italian Study on Complications of Oral Anticoagulant Therapy)].

BACKGROUND: To assess the incidence of bleeding complications during oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) in a population of patients representative of daily practice in Italian anticoagulation clinics. METHODS DESIGN: prospective, inception-cohort, multicentre. SETTING: Thirty-four anticoagulation clinics federated in the Italian Federation of Anticoagulation Clinics. PATIENTS: 2745 consecutive patients, included from beginning of their first OAT course. Most patients were aged between 60 and 79 y (57.8%), with 8% being > or = 80 y. Venous thromboembolism was the most frequent indication for OAT (one third of all the patients), followed by non ischemic heart disease which mainly included atrial fibrillation (16.8% of patients). Warfarin (in 63.8% of patients) and acenocoumarol were the only anticoagulant drugs used. The targeted anticoagulation intensity was low (INR < or = 2.8) in 71% of patients and high (INR > 2.8) in the remainder. OUTCOMES: Fatal, major and minor bleeding events. Thrombotic events were also recorded, though not analyzed in the present report. FINDINGS: During the 2011 patient-years (pt-y) of follow-up, 153 bleeding complications (7.6% pt-y) were recorded--5 fatal (all cerebral haemorrhages, 0.25% pt-y), 23 major (1.1% pt-y) and 125 minor (6.2% pt-y). The rate of events did not vary according to sex, coumarin type, size of enrolling centre or targeted therapeutic range; it was higher in older patients (10.5% pt-y in those aged > or = 70 y, relative risk--RR--1.75, p < 0.001), in cases where indication for anti-coagulant treatment was peripheral and/or cerebrovascular disease (12.5% pt-y; RR 1.80, p < 0.01) and during the first 90 days of treatment (11% pt-y, RR 1.75, p < 0.001). One fifth of bleeding events occurred at a very low anticoagulation intensity (INR < 2; the category rate being 7.7% pt-y); the rate was 4.8% pt-y in the 2.0-2.9 INR category, reaching 9.5% pt-y, 40.5% pt-y and 200% pt-y in the 3-4.4, 4.5-6.9 and > or = 7 INR categories respectively (RR for INR levels > 4.5 = 7.91, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The overall rate of bleeding events recorded in the present study was much lower than that recorded in other (including recent) observational and experimental studies. The risk of bleeding increased in the following cases: age > 70 y; arterial vascular disease as indication for OAT; first 3 months of treatment; INR values > or = 4.5. OAT has become safer in recent years, particularly if monitored in special anticoagulation clinics. Caution should be exercised when prescribing OAT in elderly patients and the intensity anticoagulation levels should be closely monitored to minimize incidental periods of overanticoagulation.

Aged↗