Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “ACTIN”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1997

Fluorescence probing of yeast actin subdomain 3/4 hydrophobic loop 262-274. Actin-actin and actin-myosin interactions in actin filaments.

Residues 262-274 form a loop between subdomains 3 and 4 of actin. This loop may play an important role in actin filament formation and stabilization. To assess directly the behavior of this loop, we mutated Ser265 of yeast actin to cysteine (S265C) and created another mutant (S265C/C374A) by changing Cys374 of S265C actin to alanine. These changes allowed us to attach a pyrene maleimide stoichiometrically to either Cys374 or Cys265. These mutations had no detectable effects on the protease susceptibility, intrinsic ATPase activity, and thermal stability of labeled or unlabeled G-actin. The presence of the loop cysteine, either labeled or unlabeled, did not affect the actin-activated S1 ATPase activity or the in vitro motility of the actin. Both mutant actins, either labeled or unlabeled, nucleated filament formation considerably faster than wild-type (WT) actin, although the critical concentration was not affected. Whereas the fluorescence of the C-terminal (WT) probe increased during polymerization, that of the loop (S265C/C374A) probe decreased, and the fluorescence of the doubly labeled actin (S265C) was approximately 50% less than the sum of the fluorescence of the individual fluorophores. Quenching was also observed in copolymers of labeled WT and S265C/C374A actins. An excimer peak was present in the emission spectrum of labeled S265C F-actin and in the labeled S265C/C374A-WT actin copolymers. These results show that in the filaments, the C-terminal pyrene of a substantial fraction of monomers directly interacts with the loop pyrene of neighboring monomers, bringing the two cysteine sulfurs to within 18 A of one another. Finally, when bound to labeled S265C/C374A F-actin, myosin S1, but not tropomyosin, caused an increase in fluorescence of the loop probe. Both proteins had no effect on excimer fluorescence. These results help establish the orientation of monomers in F-actin and show that the binding of S1 to actin subdomains 1 and 2 affects the environment of the loop between subdomains 3 and 4.

Actins↗
PubMed1995

Actin-actin contact: chemical cross-linking between actin and the 2.6-kDa peptide from subdomain 4 of actin.

Previously, we demonstrated that the 2.6-kDa peptide extending from Arg177 to Tyr198 in subdomain 4 of rabbit skeletal actin bound to actin itself, inhibited the elongation of actin filament, and severed F-actin. The corresponding segment in actin, therefore, is thought to contain the most critical actin-actin contact [Hori, K. and Morita, F. (1992) J. Biochem. 112, 401-408; Hori, K., Itoh, T., Takahashi, K., and Morita, F. (1994) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1186, 35-42]. In this paper, we report on the binding site in actin for the 2.6-kDa peptide studied by using a zero-length cross-linker, 1-ethyl-3(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide (EDC). We conducted limited digestion of actin cross-linked with the 125I-labeled 2.6-kDa peptide with various proteases, and developed peptide maps. The cross-linked region of the 2.6-kDa peptide was found to be within the region of Ala114 to Glu167 in actin by identifying the radioactive peptide fragments. The region was further restricted by isolation of radioactive peptide from alpha-chymotryptic digest of the cross-linked actin. The binding site of the 2.6-kDa peptide was finally assigned to be within the 24 amino acid segment from Ala144 to Glu167, which lies in subdomain 3 of actin. Using computer graphics, actin-actin contact provided by the two segments was suggested to be along the left-handed genetic helix of actin filament.

Actins↗
PubMed1984

Actin-actin and actin-deoxyribonuclease I contact sites in the actin sequence.

Actin subunits in F-actin were cross-linked with m-maleimidobenzoyl N-hydroxysuccinimide ester (MBS). Peptide maps of the cross-linked actin dimer have revealed that the attachment sites of the MBS cross-link in actin are Cys-373 and a lysine residue in the CB-17 segment (Lys-191, Lys-213, or Lys-215). Since MBS spans approximately 8 A, the result indicates that Cys-373 in an actin subunit is within the distance of approximately 8 A from the lysine residue in the neighboring actin subunit. Therefore, it seems that Cys-373 and the lysine residue in the CB-17 segment are close to the regions of the actin-actin contact sites. The actin-DNase I complex was cross-linked with 1,5-difluoro-2,4-dinitrobenzene ( FFD ). Peptide maps of the actin-DNase I cross-linked complex have shown that the attachment site of the FFD cross-link in actin is in its CB-10 segment. The CB-10 segment of actin contains Lys-50, Lys-61, Lys-68, Tyr-53, and Tyr-69 as candidates for the attachment site. FFD can span only 3 A, and therefore it is most likely that one of these residues is in the region of the binding site of DNase I in actin.

Actins↗
PubMed1980

Crystalline actin tubes. I. Is the conformation of the lanthanide-induced actin tube monomer more like F-actin than G-actin?

Actin, isolated from rabbit skeletal muscle, forms highly-ordered aggregates when it binds six moles of the lanthanide ion, Gd3+. In the presence of 0.1 M KCl, these aggregates are referred to as actin tubes. The monomer contained in the repeating subunit of these tubes possess a number of functional characteristics which include: (i) binding to myosin or subfragment-1 of myosin; (ii) rapid conversion into filamentous Gd-actin which can activate myosin ATPase activity; (iii) a slow rate of exchange of the bound nucleotide; (iv) a slow rate of exchange of the metal cation; (v) a resistance to digestion by proteolytic enzymes. Additionally, the monomer of the Gd-actin tube structures appears to stoichiometrically bind ATP and exhibit a lower minimum protein concentration for tube formation than is needed for the formation of F-actin. The properties listed above suggest that the actin monomer, which comprises the Gd-actin tubes, bears little resemblance to either the G-actin monomer or the recently-described actin monomer conformation that exists under conditions that favour polymerization. The data suggest that the actin molecules which comprise the Gd-actin tube structures contain sites which bind myosin, nucleotide and metal cations and that these sites are similar to the sites on F-actin.

Actins↗
PubMed2001

The second ADF/cofilin actin-binding site exists in F-actin, the cofilin-G-actin complex, but not in G-actin.

ADF/cofilins are actin binding proteins that bind actin close to both the N- and C-termini (site 1), and we have found a second cofilin binding site (site 2) centered around helix 112-125 [Renoult, C., Ternent, D., Maciver, S.K., Fattoum, A., Astier, C., Benyamin, Y. & Roustan, C. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 28893-28899]. We proposed a model in which ADF/cofilin intercalated between subdomains 1 and 2 of two longitudinally associated actin monomers within the actin:cofilin cofilament, explaining the change in twist that ADF/cofilins induce in the filament [McGough, A. Pope, B., Chiu, W. & Weeds, A. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 138, 771-781]. Here, we have determined the fuller extent of the cofilin footprint on site 1 of actin. Site 1 is primarily the G-actin binding site. Experiments with both peptide mimetics and fluorescently labeled cofilin suggest that site 2 only becomes available for cofilin binding within the filament, possibly due to motion between subdomains 1 and 2 within an actin monomer. We have detected motion between subdomains 1 and 2 of G-actin by FRET induced by cofilin, to reveal the second cofilin-binding site. This motion may also explain how cofilins inhibit the nucleotide exchange of actin, and why the actin:cofilin complex is polymerizable without dissociation.

Actin Depolymerizing Factors↗
PubMed1997

FT-Raman studies on the transformation of G-actin to F-actin, the binding of cisplatin and transplatin to F-actin and the effects of the conformation of F-actin.

The conformation change of G-actin of F-actin and the binding modes of cisplatin and transplatin to F-actin have been studied by FT-Raman spectroscopy. The studies show that the process of polymerization is related to the vibration of C-S Gauche mode (approximately 650 cm-1), which indicates that the methionine (Met) contributes to the polymerization of actin. The relative intensity of I(925)/I(803), reflecting the conformation of actin secondary structure, does not change during the polymerization process. The effect of cisplatin and transplatin on F-actin is dependent on the species and their concentrations. Cisplatin, at high concentrations, affects the conformation of F-actin mainly by binding with the sulphur of methionine. Transplatin, even at low concentrations, obviously affects the F-actin's conformation due to it's multiple binding sites, on N-containing sites in addition to S-methionine sites. These results relate to the differences in pharmacology and toxicology effects of the complexes.

Actins↗
PubMed1990

The actin released from profilin--actin complexes is insufficient to account for the increase in F-actin in chemoattractant-stimulated polymorphonuclear leukocytes.

Chemoattractant stimulation of polymorphonuclear leukocytes is associated with a nearly two-fold rise in actin filament content. We examined the role of the actin monomer sequestering protein, profilin, in the regulation of PMN actin filament assembly during chemoattractant stimulation using a Triton extraction method. Poly-L-proline-conjugated Sepharose beads were used to assess the relative concentration of actin bound to profilin with high enough affinity to withstand dilution (profilin-actin complex) and DNase I-conjugated beads to measure the relative concentration of actin in the Triton-soluble fraction not bound to profilin. Actin associated with the Triton-insoluble fraction (F-actin) was also measured. In unstimulated PMN, the relative concentration of actin bound to profilin was maximum. After FMLP stimulation, profilin released actin monomers within 10 s, with the profilin-actin complex concentration reaching a nadir by 40 s and remaining low as long as the cells were exposed to chemoattractant (up to 30 min). If FMLP was dissociated from PMN membrane receptors using t-BOC, actin reassociated with profilin within 20 s. Quantitative analysis of these reactions, however, revealed that profilin release of and rebinding to actin could account for only a small percentage of the total change in F-actin content. Determination of the total profilin and actin concentrations in PMN revealed that the molar ratio of profilin to actin was 1 to 5.2. When purified actin was polymerized in PMN Triton extract containing EGTA, removal of profilin from the extract minimally affected (12% reduction) the high apparent critical concentration at which actin began to assemble. Although profilin released actin at the appropriate time to stimulate actin assembly during exposure to chemoattractants, the concentration of profilin in PMN was insufficient to explain the high unpolymerized actin content in unstimulated PMN and the quantity of actin released from profilin too small to account for the large shifts from unpolymerized to polymerized actin associated with maximal chemoattractant stimulation.

Actins↗
PubMed1994

Induction of the polymerization of actin from the actin:thymosin beta 4 complex by phalloidin, skeletal myosin subfragment 1, chicken intestinal myosin I and free ends of filamentous actin.

Thymosin beta 4 is able to form 1:1 complexes with monomeric (G) actin, thereby stabilizing the intracellular pool of unpolymerized actin. We have searched for factors that are able to induce the polymerization of actin from the actin:thymosin beta 4 complex. Phalloidin, subfragment 1 isolated from rabbit skeletal muscle myosin and chicken intestinal myosin I are demonstrated to be able to polymerize the actin from this complex in the presence of 1 mM MgCl2. Polymerization of actin was verified by the DNase I inhibition assay, by cosedimentation and from the fluorescence increase of pyrene-labelled actin. Actin filaments formed under the influence of subfragment 1 or phalloidin were visualized under the electron microscope after negative staining. Polymerization of skeletal muscle actin from the complex with thymosin beta 4 by phalloidin is accompanied by the hydrolysis of the actin-bound ATP to ADP. Polymerization was also induced by sonicated F-actin which possessed a high concentration of free filament ends. F-actin was severed by 0.01 M human cytoplasmic gelsolin, which is known to possess blocked+ends. Free, slowly growing-ends were unable to induce polymerization of actin from the thymosin beta 4 complex. However, when gelsolin on its own or in complex with two actin molecules was added to actin:thymosin beta 4 under nucleating conditions, it was found to be able to promote actin repolymerization provided that its concentration was close to the dissociation constant (Kd) of actin:thymosin beta 4. This Kd was found to be 0.4 microM in the presence of 1 mM MgCl2 and the absence of KCl and, thus, close to the critical concentration of actin polymerization under these conditions. The source of actin did not influence its polymerization from the thymosin beta 4 complex; rabbit skeletal muscle actin and porcine brain actin were polymerized with equal efficiency from their complexes with thymosin beta 4 by both phalloidin and myosin subfragment 1. Skeletal muscle, but not cytoplasmic actin, was found to be also polymerized in the presence of increased CaCl2 concentrations to values above 1 mM.

Actins↗
PubMed1996

Ca2+ bound to the high affinity divalent cation-binding site of actin enhances actophorin-induced depolymerization of muscle F-actin but inhibits actophorin-induced depolymerization of Acanthamoeba F-actin.

The cation tightly bound to actin, Mg2+ or Ca2+, affects the ability of actophorin to accelerate depolymerization of filaments and bind to monomers of actin prepared from rabbit skeletal muscle and Acanthamoeba castellanii. Actophorin interacted similarly with muscle and Acanthamoeba Mg2(+)-F-actin but depolymerized muscle Mg2(+)-F-actin more efficiently. Muscle Ca2(+)-F-actin depolymerized about 5 times more rapidly than Mg2(+)-F-actin in the presence of actophorin but Acanthamoeba Ca2(+)-F-actin was highly resistant to actophorin. Muscle actin subunits dissociated more rapidly than Acanthamoeba actin subunits from copolymers of muscle and Acanthamoeba Ca2(+)-actin upon addition of actophorin although Acanthamoeba actin dissociated much more rapidly from copolymers than from its homopolymer. The Kd of the 1:1 complex between actophorin and monomeric actin was somewhat lower for muscle Mg2(+)-ATP-G-actin than for both Acanthamoeba Mg2(+)-ATP-G-actin and muscle Ca2(+)-ATP-G-actin. The data for the interactions of actophorin with Acanthamoeba Ca2(+)-ATP-G-actin or muscle and amoeba Mg2(+)- and Ca2(+)-ADP-G-actin were incompatible with the formation of 1:1 actin: actophorin complexes and, thus, Kd values could not be calculated. While it may not be surprising that actophorin would interact differently with Mg2(+)- and Ca2(+)-actin, it is unexpected that the nature of the tightly bound cation would have such dramatically opposite effects on the ability of actophorin to depolymerize muscle and Acanthamoeba F-actin. Differential severing by actophorin, with Acanthamoeba Ca2(+)-actin being almost totally resistant, is sufficient to explain the results but other possibilities cannot be ruled out.

Acanthamoeba↗
PubMed1993

Nebulin as an actin zipper. A two-module nebulin fragment promotes actin nucleation and stabilizes actin filaments.

Nebulin is a family of giant muscle proteins (700-900 kDa) that interact with actin to form composite thin filaments in the skeletal muscle sarcomere. This modular protein is composed predominantly of repeating sequence modules of 31-38 residues. To understand the minimum size and number of sequence modules that are required for actin interaction, we studied the behavior of a highly soluble two-module nebulin fragment ND8 that was expressed in Escherichia coli. By fluorescence spectroscopy with pyrenyl-actin and co-sedimentation assays, we observed the following. 1) ND8 greatly accelerated actin nucleation, especially in a buffer that is suboptimal for actin nucleation. The presence of ND8 abolished the lag phase of actin polymerization and increased the net extent of steady state polymerization, thereby reducing the critical concentration of actin polymerization. 2) ND8 reduced the rate of actin depolymerization and might increase the rate of elongation. 3) Cytochalasin E, which caps both ends of actin filaments, inhibited the effect of ND8 on actin polymerization and caused the depolymerization of actin-ND8 complexes. These data suggest that ND8 interacts with actin in such a fashion that it stabilizes the actin nuclei and slows the depolymerization from the ends of actin filaments. 4) The binding stoichiometry of ND8 to F-actin, as estimated by co-sedimentation assays, is 1 to 2 mol of ND8 to 1 mol of actin with an apparent dissociation constant of 20 to 40 microM. Our data suggest that nebulin-actin interaction promotes actin nucleation and stabilizes preformed actin filaments, both of which are desirable attributes of a length-regulating template for actin filaments of the skeletal muscle. Each nebulin molecule may contain as many as 100-200 actin binding domains to form a zipper-like nebulin/actin composite filament.

Actins↗
PubMed2004

Non-muscle actin filament elongation from complexes of profilin with nucleotide-free actin and divalent cation-free ATP-actin.

Using vertebrate cytoplasmic actin consisting of a mixture of beta and gamma isoforms, we previously characterized profilin and nucleotide binding to monomeric actin (Kinosian, H. J., et al. (2000) Biochemistry 39, 13176-13188) and F-actin barbed end elongation from profilin-actin (PA) (Kinosian, H. J., et al. (2002) Biochemistry 41, 6734-6743). Our initial calculations indicated that elongation of F-actin from PA was more energetically favorable than elongation of F-actin from monomeric actin; therefore, the overall actin elongation reaction scheme described by these two linked reactions appeared to be thermodynamically unbalanced. However, we hypothesized that the profilin-induced weakening of MgATP binding by actin reduces the negative free energy change for the formation of profilin-MgATP-actin from MgATP-actin. When this was taken into account, the overall reaction scheme was calculated to be thermodynamically balanced. In our present work, we test this hypothesis by measuring actin filament barbed end elongation of nucleotide-free actin (NF-A) and nucleotide-free profilin-actin (NF-PA). We find that the free energy change for elongation of F-actin by NF-PA is equal to that for elongation of F-actin from NF-A, indicating energetic balance of the linked reactions. In the absence of actin-bound divalent cation, profilin has very little effect on ATP binding to actin; analysis of elongation experiments with divalent cation-free ATP-actin and profilin yielded an approximately energetically balanced reaction scheme. Thus, the data in this present report support our earlier hypothesis.

Actin Cytoskeleton↗
PubMed1997

High rates of actin filament turnover in budding yeast and roles for actin in establishment and maintenance of cell polarity revealed using the actin inhibitor latrunculin-A.

We report that the actin assembly inhibitor latrunculin-A (LAT-A) causes complete disruption of the yeast actin cytoskeleton within 2-5 min, suggesting that although yeast are nonmotile, their actin filaments undergo rapid cycles of assembly and disassembly in vivo. Differences in the LAT-A sensitivities of strains carrying mutations in components of the actin cytoskeleton suggest that tropomyosin, fimbrin, capping protein, Sla2p, and Srv2p act to increase actin cytoskeleton stability, while End3p and Sla1p act to decrease stability. Identification of three LAT-A resistant actin mutants demonstrated that in vivo effects of LAT-A are due specifically to impairment of actin function and implicated a region on the three-dimensional actin structure as the LAT-A binding site. LAT-A was used to determine which of 19 different proteins implicated in cell polarity development require actin to achieve polarized localization. Results show that at least two molecular pathways, one actin-dependent and the other actin-independent, underlie polarity development. The actin-dependent pathway localizes secretory vesicles and a putative vesicle docking complex to sites of cell surface growth, providing an explanation for the dependence of polarized cell surface growth on actin function. Unexpectedly, several proteins that function with actin during cell polarity development, including an unconventional myosin (Myo2p), calmodulin, and an actin-interacting protein (Bud6/Aip3p), achieved polarized localization by an actin-independent pathway, revealing interdependence among cell polarity pathways. Finally, transient actin depolymerization caused many cells to abandon one bud site or mating projection and to initiate growth at a second site. Thus, actin filaments are also required for maintenance of an axis of cell polarity.

Actin Cytoskeleton↗
PubMed2004

Green fluorescent protein-mTalin causes defects in actin organization and cell expansion in Arabidopsis and inhibits actin depolymerizing factor's actin depolymerizing activity in vitro.

Expression of green fluorescent protein (GFP) linked to an actin binding domain is a commonly used method for live cell imaging of the actin cytoskeleton. One of these chimeric proteins is GFP-mTalin (GFP fused to the actin binding domain of mouse talin). Although it has been demonstrated that GFP-mTalin colocalizes with the actin cytoskeleton, its effect on actin dynamics and cell expansion has not been studied in detail. We created Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) plants harboring alcohol inducible GFP-mTalin constructs to assess the effect of GFP-mTalin expression in vivo. We focused on the growing root hair as this is a model cell for studying cell expansion and root hair tip growth that requires a highly dynamic and polar actin cytoskeleton. We show that alcohol inducible expression of GFP-mTalin in root hairs causes severe defects in actin organization, resulting in either the termination of growth, cell death, and/or changes in cell shape. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching experiments demonstrate that the interaction of GFP-mTalin and actin filaments is highly dynamic. To assess how GFP-mTalin affects actin dynamics we performed cosedimentation assays of GFP-mTalin with actin on its own or in the presence of the actin modulating protein, actin depolymerizing factor. We show that that GFP-mTalin does not affect actin polymerization but that it does inhibit the actin depolymerizing activity of actin depolymerizing factor. These observations demonstrate that GFP-mTalin can affect cell expansion, actin organization, and the interaction of actin binding proteins with actin.

Actin Depolymerizing Factors↗
PubMed2001

The affinity of chick cofilin for actin increases when actin is complexed with DNase I: formation of a cofilin-actin-DNase I ternary complex.

Cofilin, an actin-binding protein, regulates the rate, nature and extent of assembly of the actin cytoskeleton. Native Phast gels show that the addition of cofilin to an actin-DNase I complex (74 kDa) results in the formation of a ternary complex of 94 kDa indicating an equimolar stoichiometry in the ternary complex. Furthermore, native gels show that the addition of cofilin to a solution containing free actin and actin-DNase I and run at pH 8.3 results in cofilin complexing preferentially to the actin-DNase I complex. Conversely, the addition of DNase I to a solution containing an actin-cofilin complex and free actin results in the preferential binding of DNase I to the actin-cofilin complex. These results show that the affinity of cofilin for actin can be increased when actin forms binary complexes. When native gels were run at pH 6.8 the affinity of cofilin for monomeric actin was greater than for the actin-DNase I complex indicating that the cofilin-actin interaction can be regulated by changes in pH. The addition of cofilin to actin resulted in the polymerisation of actin at pH 6.8 whereas at alkaline pH a stable cofilin-actin binary complex could be formed. The biological implications are discussed.

Actin Depolymerizing Factors↗
PubMed1997

Mechanism of myosin subfragment-1-induced assembly of CaG-actin and MgG-actin into F-actin-S1-decorated filaments.

The kinetics and mechanism of myosin subfragment-1-induced polymerization of G-actin into F-actin-S1-decorated filaments have been investigated in low ionic strength buffer and in the absence of free ATP. The mechanism of assembly of F-actin-S1 differs from salt-induced assembly of F-actin. Initial condensation of G-actin and S1 into oligomers in reversible equilibrium is a prerequisite step in the formation of F-actin-S1 . Oligomers have a relatively low stability (10(6) M-1) and contain S1 in a molar ratio to actin close to 0.5. Increased binding of S1 up to a 1:1 molar ratio to actin is associated with further irreversible condensation of oligomers into large F-actin-S1 structures of very high stability. In contrast to salt-induced assembly of F-actin, no monomer-polymer equilibrium, characterized by a critical concentration, can be defined for F-actin-S1 assembly, and end-to-end annealing of oligomers is predominant over growth from nuclei in the kinetics. Simultaneous recordings of the changes in light scattering, pyrenyl- and NBD-actin fluorescence, ATP hydrolysis, and release of Pi during the polymerization process have been analyzed to propose a minimum kinetic scheme for assembly, within which several elementary steps, following oligomer formation, are required for assembly of F-actin-S1. ATP hydrolysis occurs before polymerization of MgATP-G-actin but not of CaATP-G-actin. The release of inorganic phosphate occurs on F-actin-S1 at the same rate as on F-actin.

Actin Cytoskeleton↗
PubMed2004

The V-ATPase subunit C binds to polymeric F-actin as well as to monomeric G-actin and induces cross-linking of actin filaments.

Previously, we have shown that the V-ATPase holoenzyme as well as the V1 complex isolated from the midgut of the tobacco hornworm (Manduca sexta) exhibits the ability of binding to actin filaments via the V1 subunits B and C (Vitavska, O., Wieczorek, H., and Merzendorfer,H. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 18499-18505). Since the recombinant subunit C not only enhances actin binding of the V1 complex but also can bind separately to F-actin, we analyzed the interaction of recombinant subunit C with actin. We demonstrate that it binds not only to F-actin but also to monomeric G-actin. With dissociation constants of approximately 50 nm, the interaction exhibits a high affinity, and no difference could be observed between binding to ATP-G-actin or ADP-G-actin, respectively. Unlike other proteins such as members of the ADF/cofilin family, which also bind to G- as well as to F-actin, subunit C does not destabilize actin filaments. On the contrary, under conditions where the disassembly of F-actin into G-actin usually occurred, subunit C stabilized F-actin. In addition, it increased the initial rate of actin polymerization in a concentration-dependent manner and was shown to cross-link actin filaments to bundles of varying thickness. Apparently bundling is enabled by the existence of at least two actin-binding sites present in the N- and in the C-terminal halves of subunits C, respectively. Since subunit C has the possibility to dimerize or even to oligomerize, spacing between actin filaments could be variable in size.

Actin Cytoskeleton↗
PubMed1998

Disruption of the actin cytoskeleton of mammalian cells by the capping complex actin-fragmin is inhibited by actin phosphorylation and regulated by Ca2+ ions.

Fragmin from Physarum polycephalum is a gelsolin-like actin-binding protein and interferes with the growth of actin filaments in vitro by severing actin filaments and capping their barbed ends through formation of an actin-fragmin dimer in a Ca2+-dependent manner. The actin-fragmin dimer is phosphorylated in vivo and in vitro on the actin subunit by the actin-fragmin kinase. We have studied the properties of these capping proteins and their regulation by actin phosphorylation and Ca2+ ions in living PtK2, CV1 and NIH3T3 cultured cells by microinjection or by expression in conjunction with immunostaining and fluorescence microscopy. Microinjection of the actin-fragmin dimer disintegrated the actin cytoskeleton and altered cell morphology. This in vivo effect could be blocked by phosphorylation of the actin subunit by the actin-fragmin kinase in low Ca2+ conditions, and the capping activity could be recovered by high Ca2+ concentration, probably through activation of the second actin-binding site in fragmin. This suggests that in Physarum microplasmodia, actin polymerization can be controlled in a Ca2+-dependent manner through the phosphorylation of actin. Microinjected or overexpressed recombinant fragmin did not affect the actin-based cytoskeleton or cell morphology of resting cells, unless the cytosolic free Ca2+ concentration was increased by microinjection of a Ca2+-containing buffer. The cells were able to revert to their normal phenotype which indicates that endogenous regulatory mechanisms counteracted fragmin activity, probably by uncapping fragmin from the barbed ends of filaments. Fragmin also antagonized formation of stress fibers induced by lysophosphatidic acid. Our findings demonstrate that the interactions between actin and fragmin are tightly regulated by the cytosolic Ca2+ concentration and this provides a basis for a more general mechanism in higher organisms to regulate microfilament organization.

3T3 Cells↗
PubMed1997

F-actin and G-actin binding are uncoupled by mutation of conserved tyrosine residues in maize actin depolymerizing factor (ZmADF).

Actin depolymerizing factors (ADF) are stimulus responsive actin cytoskeleton modulating proteins. They bind both monomeric actin (G-actin) and filamentous actin (F-actin) and, under certain conditions, F-actin binding is followed by filament severing. In this paper, using mutant maize ADF3 proteins, we demonstrate that the maize ADF3 binding of F-actin can be spatially distinguished from that of G-actin. One mutant, zmadf3-1, in which Tyr-103 and Ala-104 (equivalent to destrin Tyr-117 and Ala-118) have been replaced by phenylalanine and glycine, respectively, binds more weakly to both G-actin and F-actin compared with maize ADF3. A second mutant, zmadf3-2, in which both Tyr-67 and Tyr-70 are replaced by phenylalanine, shows an affinity for G-actin similar to maize ADF3, but F-actin binding is abolished. The two tyrosines, Tyr-67 and Tyr-70, are in the equivalent position to Tyr-82 and Tyr-85 of destrin, respectively. Using the tertiary structure of destrin, yeast cofilin, and Acanthamoeba actophorin, we discuss the implications of removing the aromatic hydroxyls of Tyr-82 and Tyr-85 (i.e., the effect of substituting phenylalanine for tyrosine) and conclude that Tyr-82 plays a critical role in stabilizing the tertiary structure that is essential for F-actin binding. We propose that this tertiary structure is maintained as a result of a hydrogen bond between the hydroxyl of Tyr-82 and the carbonyl of Tyr-117, which is located in the long alpha-helix; amino acid components of this helix (Leu-111 to Phe-128) have been implicated in G-actin and F-actin binding. The structures of human destrin and yeast cofilin indicate a hydrogen distance of 2.61 and 2.77 A, respectively, with corresponding bond angles of 99.5 degrees and 113 degrees, close to the optimum for a strong hydrogen bond.

Actin Depolymerizing Factors↗