Search PubMedSearch

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “100,000 Genomes Project”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

11 recordsLinked to original sources

Evaluating the return of additional findings from the 100,000 Genomes Project: A mixed-methods study exploring participant experiences of receiving secondary findings from genomic sequencing.

PURPOSE: The 100,000 Genomes Project participants could consent to receive additional findings (AFs) for variants associated with susceptibility to cancer and familial hypercholesterolemia. Here, we evaluate stakeholder experiences to inform clinical practice. METHODS: Mixed-methods study conducted at 18 sites across England that comprised a cross-sectional survey and interviews with participants who received a positive AF (PAF) and interviews with participants who had no AFs (NAF). RESULTS: There were 146 surveys followed by 35 interviews with PAF participants and 29 interviews with NAF participants. Surveys found that PAF results were seen as useful and would influence health management (82%). Most (90%) had shared their result with family members. Experiences differed by PAF type; cancer PAF participants were often initially shocked and anxious and found telling family members challenging compared with participants with a familial hypercholesterolemia PAF. Although most experiences of NAF results were positive, some misunderstandings were identified. Participants supported returning AFs when offering genome sequencing. CONCLUSION: Patient experiences of receiving AFs were primarily positive, and there is support for offering AFs routinely. Considerations for offering AFs in clinical practice include adapting approaches tailored to individual conditions and greater support for people with a NAF result.

Humans

Costs and cost-effectiveness of returning secondary findings from genomic sequencing based on the return of additional findings in the 100,000 Genomes Project.

PURPOSE: To assess costs and cost-effectiveness of returning additional findings from genome sequencing using data from the 100,000 Genomes Project (100kGP). METHODS: A model-based cost-utility analysis combining yield, consent rates, and cost data from the 100kGP with published estimates of downstream costs and quality-adjusted life years expected to accrue over a lifetime, after the identification of a pathogenic variant. RESULTS: The cost of returning additional findings to participants in the 100kGP was £7.1m or £81 per participant, with a yield of 0.85% for consented participants. The estimated lifetime incremental cost per participant was £125 and quality-adjusted life years 0.004, giving an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £28,830. Implementing a policy of returning additional findings is unlikely to be cost-effective (ie, 13%) at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000. A short-term cost of returning findings of £43 per participant or lower (compared with the base case of £81) would result in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of less than £20,000. Alternatively, cost-effectiveness may be improved by returning additional findings to younger patient populations. CONCLUSION: Return of additional findings following genome sequencing for this group of conditions may not be a cost-effective use of health care system resources. Our cost-effectiveness outcomes rely on published estimates and should be validated through long-term follow-up data.

Humans

Delivering effective genome sequencing in pediatric care: From research in the 100,000 Genomes Project to routine clinical practice.

PURPOSE: Genome sequencing (GS) is increasingly used to investigate rare conditions, primarily in children. The 100,000 Genomes Project (100KG) evaluated GS ahead of implementation in the English National Health Service. In 2020, the National Health Service Genomic Medicine Service (GMS) became the first public health care system to offer GS in routine clinical care. We investigate how learning from 100KG informed GMS service delivery. METHODS: We compare GS outcomes in children tested at a large pediatric hospital via GMS (n = 501) and 100KG research (n = 1759). RESULTS: GMS diagnostic yield (29%) was higher than that in 100KG (22%) (P < .0016). Median age at testing was 8 years in 100KG and 6 in the GMS (P < .05). In 100KG, the diagnostic yield was <10% for 15 indications, none of which are included in GMS testing. 100KG data showed little benefit to application of >3 panels. Use of fewer but larger GMS panels resulted in a significantly higher number of genes tested per patient: median 2801 vs 1373 in 100KG (P < .001). In 100KG, diagnostic yield was not significantly increased by testing more than 3 family members (n = 34/142, 24%). CONCLUSION: Learning from 100KG has informed GS clinical service delivery, resulting in higher diagnostic yields and earlier age at testing. Lessons are broadly applicable to all services providing GS, enabling earlier access to tailored management with fewer investigations.

Humans

Equity in genome sequencing for rare disease diagnosis: a cross-sectional analysis of data from the UK 100,000 Genomes Project.

BACKGROUND: Genome sequencing has improved rare disease diagnosis and is now part of routine clinical care in the National Health Service in England. Automated prioritisation pipelines narrow millions of variants per patient to a small subset for clinical review, a process that relies on allele frequency resources that do not fully represent human genetic diversity. We assessed ancestry-related differences in variant prioritisation and diagnostic outcomes in patients from the UK 100,000 Genomes Project. METHODS: We analysed 29,405 rare disease probands with genome sequencing and linked clinical outcomes data. We used multivariable regression to assess ancestry-related differences in the number of variants prioritised for clinical review, the proportion of prioritised variants that were recorded as diagnostic, and diagnostic yield. We also evaluated the use of ancestry-stratified allele frequency filters derived from an independent, diverse UK cohort (n = 33,724). FINDINGS: Compared with the European ancestry group, the East African group had nearly three times more variants prioritised for clinical review (IRR 2.77, 95% CI 2.33-3.29). Other non-European groups also had significantly higher counts. Diagnostic yield was similar across ancestry groups after adjustment (LRT p = 0.1650). Prioritised variants were less likely to be recorded as diagnostic in East African (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.22-0.46), West African (0.47, 0.39-0.57), South Asian (0.65, 0.58-0.73), and Middle Eastern (0.68, 0.54-0.86) groups. Applying ancestry-stratified allele-frequency filters removed 3.1% of prioritised variants overall-24.3% in the East African group-without loss of diagnostic sensitivity, including 29.5% of recorded VUS in this group. INTERPRETATION: Differences in the likelihood of prioritised variants being recorded as diagnostic partly reflect limitations of current allele frequency resources, which use broad population groupings that mask within-group diversity. Increased representation of diverse ancestries in reference databases and better estimation of ancestry-appropriate allele frequencies will help reduce inefficiencies and improve equity in variant prioritisation for rare disease diagnosis. FUNDING: The UK Department of Health and Social Care and the EU's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme.

Humans

Improved diagnosis of patients with rare diseases through the application of constrained coding region annotation and de novo status.

PURPOSE: Identifying the pathogenic variant in a patient with rare disease (RD) is the first step in ending their diagnostic odyssey. De novo (Dn) variants affecting protein-coding DNA are a well-established cause of Mendelian disorders in patients with RD. Constrained coding regions (CCRs) are specific segments of coding DNA that are devoid of functional variants in healthy individuals. METHODS: We evaluated the diagnostic utility of incorporating combined Dn/CCR status into the variant prioritization cascade for patients with RD that have undergone genomic sequencing. Using the Genomics England 100,000 Genomes Project v12, we selected 3090 trios that have undergone diagnostic evaluation and been analyzed with an advanced Dn identification pipeline. RESULTS: Our analysis shows that the diagnostic rate increased from 71% in the full cohort to 87% for Dn/CCR variants. Of note, manual evaluation of the Dn/CCR variants from undiagnosed patients with clinical follow-up revealed a diagnosis for 13 further patients. This outcome increases the diagnostic rate for Dn/CCR variants to 91% and suggests that the application of this metric can prioritize diagnostic variants in undiagnosed patients. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate the potential clinical utility of performing bespoke Dn analyses of patients with RD and for incorporating CCR information into the filtering cascade to prioritize pathogenic variants.

Humans

XXYLT1 and Mendelian Retinal Dystrophy.

IMPORTANCE: Substantial unexplained heritability remains for pathogenic inherited retinal disease (IRD) variants. Application of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) could help identify causal genes in rare diseases. OBJECTIVE: To leverage a GWAS for the discovery of IRD-associated genes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This GWAS analysis was combined with replication of findings in 2 independent IRD cohorts. The study was conducted from January 2024 to December 2025 in a multicenter setting through FinnGen, 100&#x202f;000 Genomes Project, and the National Health Service Genomic Medicine Service combined with clinical cohort from the Oulu University Hospital. Using IRD criteria from the International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th Revisions, 540 individuals with IRD and 473&#x202f;945 control individuals were identified in the FinnGen study. For validation of FinnGen results, 49 patients were recruited from Oulu University Hospital. Results were further validated in 2 individuals identified from the UK cohort. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The GWAS and proteomics analysis were performed in the FinnGen cohort. Sanger and whole-genome sequencing and RNA approaches were used in a clinical IRD cohort to validate pathogenicity of the identified XXYLT1 variant. RESULTS: This GWAS identified 13 recessive loci reaching genome-wide significance (defined as P&#x2009;<&#x2009;5&#x2009;&#xd7;&#x2009;10-8). Of these, 4 (near or within XXYLT1, ANKRD10, DYM, and CBLN4) had not been associated with IRD, including the XXYLT1 c.505-1G>C founder variant. This variant was further genotyped in the clinical replication cohort, leading to identification of 5 more homozygous individuals from 4 families. The phenotype was consistent with a cone-rod or macular dystrophy, with visual deterioration, cystoid macular edema and/or schisislike macular abnormalities. The effect of the XXYLT1 c.505-1G>C variant was further investigated using RNA sequencing and complementary DNA amplicon sequencing, demonstrating exon 2 skipping and a loss-of-function effect. These findings were replicated in an independent population identifying 2 patients from the UK harboring a homozygous XXYLT1 c.766G>A, p.(Glu256Lys) missense variant. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This GWAS identified an association between XXYLT1 and IRD. These results affirm that GWAS in a founder population can be used as a potential tool for the discovery of rare mendelian disease genes and that XXYLT1 should be considered in clinical IRD gene panels.

Humans

Obtaining a Diagnostic Yield via Scan findings prior to the introduction of SEquencing retrospectivelY (ODYSSEY): a cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the retrospective yield of prenatal exome sequencing (PES) by establishing the proportion of children with a postnatal monogenic diagnosis that could have been diagnosed prenatally if PES had been available. METHODS: The study cohort comprised a sample of children in Northern Ireland, born between January 2010 and January 2018 (predating routine availability of PES), who received a monogenic diagnosis postnatally via next generation sequencing as part of either of two UK-wide studies (the 100&#x2009;000 Genomes Project (2015-2018) or the Deciphering Developmental Disorders study (2011-2015)). Clinical data were collected retrospectively and correlated with the current UK National Health Service PES protocol, including the phenotypic eligibility criteria for PES and the associated fetal anomalies gene panel. Cases were considered retrospective diagnoses if the fetal phenotype would have been eligible for PES and the diagnostic gene was included on the test panel, meaning prenatal diagnosis in this current era could have been feasible. RESULTS: Of 101 children, 17.8% (95%&#x2009;CI, 10.3-25.3%) had both an eligible fetal structural anomaly (FSA) (i.e. high-risk FSA) and a diagnostic gene on the associated test panel, meaning that they could have been diagnosed prenatally in the current clinical landscape. The median length of the diagnostic odyssey for this subgroup of children was 3.7&#x2009;years (1354&#x2009;(range, 822-2450)&#x2009;days). Moreover, 58.4% (n&#x2009;=&#x2009;59) of cases had no anomalies detected prenatally and 19.8% (n&#x2009;=&#x2009;20) had a FSA that would not meet the eligibility criteria for PES (low-risk FSA). Although these cases would have been ineligible for PES under the current clinical pathway, 89.9% (n&#x2009;=&#x2009;71/79) were affected by severe or profound syndromes. Postnatally, the most common functional anomalies were neurodevelopmental delay/intellectual disability and/or behavioral abnormality, which were observed in 80.2% (n&#x2009;=&#x2009;81) of the included children. However, 80.2% (n&#x2009;=&#x2009;65/81) of these affected children did not present with fetal anomalies eligible for PES. CONCLUSIONS: Almost one-fifth of children with a monogenic condition included in this study could have received a diagnosis via modern PES, avoiding a diagnostic odyssey lasting almost 4&#x2009;years. However, despite having a monogenic condition, over half of the children did not present with any structural anomalies in utero. This demonstrates the degree to which fetal imaging is limited in its ability to reassure parents of the absence of a fetal genetic syndrome. &#xa9; 2026 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Humans

Utility of genome sequencing and group-enrichment to support splice variant interpretation in Marfan syndrome.

PURPOSE: To quantify the impact of noncanonical FBN1 splice site variants in undiagnosed Marfan syndrome (MFS), a connective tissue disorder associated with skeletal abnormalities and familial thoracic aortic aneurysm disease (FTAAD). METHODS: A systematic analysis of ultrarare FBN1 variants was performed using genome sequencing data from the 100,000 Genomes Project. Variants were annotated with SpliceAI and the significance of enrichment among individuals with FTAAD was assessed using Fisher's exact test. Experimental validation used RNA sequencing, reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, minigene constructs, and replication analysis was with data from UK Biobank. RESULTS: Using aggregate data for 78,195 individuals, we identified 13,864 singleton single-nucleotide variants in FBN1 of which 21 were predicted to affect splicing (SpliceAI > 0.5). Incidence of candidate splice variants in individuals recruited with FTAAD (9/703) was significantly elevated compared with that seen in non-FTAAD participants (12/77,492; odds ratio = 84, P = 9.7 &#xd7; 10-14). Additional analysis uncovered a further 14 families harboring 11 different FBN1 splice variants. A total of 20 candidate splice variants in 23 families were identified, of which 70% lay beyond the &#xb1;8 splice regions. RNA testing confirmed the predicted splice aberration in 16 of 20 and for 9 of 20, pseudoexonization was the likely splicing anomaly. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that noncanonical splice variants may account for approximately 3% of families with undiagnosed FTAAD, highlighting the importance of incorporating analysis of introns and confirmatory RNA testing into genetic testing for Marfan syndrome.

Humans

Complex de novo structural variants are an underestimated cause of rare disorders.

Complex de novo structural variants (dnSVs) are crucial genetic factors in rare disorders, yet their prevalence and characteristics in rare disorders remain poorly understood. Here, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of whole-genome sequencing data of 12,568 families, including 13,698 offspring with rare diseases, obtained as part of the UK 100,000 Genomes Project. We identify 1,870 dnSVs, constituting the largest dnSV dataset reported to date. Complex dnSVs (n&#x2009;=&#x2009;158; 8.4%) emerge as the third most common type of SV, following simple deletions and duplications. We classify 65% of these complex dnSVs into 11 subtypes. Among probands with dnSVs (n&#x2009;=&#x2009;1,696), 9% exhibit exon-disrupting pathogenic dnSVs associated with the probands' phenotype. Notably, 12% of exon-disrupting pathogenic dnSVs and 22% of de novo deletions or duplications previously identified by array-based or whole-exome sequencing methods are found to be complex dnSVs. We also find distinct genomic properties of de novo deletions depending on the parent of origin. This study highlights the importance of complex dnSVs in the cause of rare disorders and demonstrates the necessity of specific genomic analysis to avoid overlooking these variants.

Humans

Proteomics identify disease-associated variants in patients with rare diseases undiagnosed after genome sequencing.

Despite the introduction of genome sequencing (GS) for rare disease diagnostics, a genetic cause is not identified in most patients. Here, we explored the potential of proteomics to improve the diagnostic yield in 424 patients with rare diseases from the 100,000 Genomes Project (100kGP) without a genetic diagnosis. Serum proteomic profiling was performed using the Olink Explore 1536 assay (N&#xa0;=&#xa0;1463 proteins). For 13 patients without genetic diagnoses, detection of lower serum protein "outliers" (z-score&#xa0;<&#xa0;-2) led to confirmed genetic diagnoses by resolving variants of uncertain significance or prioritizing genes for targeted GS reanalysis. For 23 additional patients without genetic diagnoses (64% of findings), we identified candidate gene-disease links and variants through convergent evidence from lower protein outliers and variants ranked through the variant prioritization tool Exomiser. For example, we identified a candidate heterozygous missense variant [Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) minor allele frequency&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.006%] in tyrosine kinase with immunoglobulin-like and epidermal growth factor homology domains 1 (TIE1) that was only present in a patient with lower TIE1 serum abundance (z-score&#xa0;=&#xa0;-5.12) and their father, both of whom were affected by the same monogenic cardiac disorder, but in no other individuals from the 100kGP. Missense (52.5%) and splice region (27.5%) variants accounted for most diagnostic or candidate variants prioritized. This proof-of-principle study demonstrated that serum proteomics can support rare disease diagnosis and identify disease-causing genes in patients undiagnosed after GS, although successful implementation will likely depend on tissue specificity of protein expression, detectability in blood, proteomic platform coverage, and sensitivity.

Humans

Dual diagnosis of achondroplasia and mandibulofacial dysostosis with microcephaly.

BACKGROUND: Achondroplasia and mandibulofacial dysostosis with microcephaly (MFDM) are rare monogenic, dominant disorders, caused by gain-of-function fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) gene variants and loss-of-function elongation factor Tu GTP binding domain-containing 2 (EFTUD2) gene variants, respectively. The coexistence of two distinct Mendelian disorders in a single individual is uncommon and challenges the traditional paradigm of a single genetic disorder explaining a patient's symptoms, opening new avenues for diagnosis and management. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of a female patient initially diagnosed with achondroplasia due to a maternally inherited pathogenic FGFR3 variant. She was referred to our genetic department due to her unusually small head circumference and short stature, which were both significantly below the expected range for achondroplasia. Additional features included distinctive facial characteristics, significant speech delay, conductive hearing loss, and epilepsy. Given the complexity of her phenotype, she was recruited to the DDD (Deciphering Developmental Disorders) study and the 100,000 Genomes project for further investigation. Subsequent identification of a complex EFTUD2 intragenic rearrangement confirmed an additional diagnosis of mandibulofacial dysostosis with microcephaly (MFDM). CONCLUSION: This report presents the first case of a dual molecular diagnosis of achondroplasia and mandibulofacial dysostosis with microcephaly in the same patient. This case underscores the complexity of genetic diagnoses and the potential for coexistence of multiple genetic syndromes in a single patient. This case expands our understanding of the molecular basis of dual Mendelian disorders and highlights the importance of considering the possibility of dual molecular diagnoses in patients with phenotypic features that are not fully accounted for by their primary diagnosis.

Humans