Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Manometry”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,783 records · Page 99Linked to original sources
PubMed2002

[Primary esophageal motor disorders in childhood, genuine achalasia excluded].

AIM: Esophageal manometry has been increasingly used in children allowing better description of esophageal primary disorders as partial achalasia. The aim of this retrospective study was to describe clinical manifestations of partial achalasia, to look for their specificities and to follow clinical and manometric evolution in response to treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients (mean age four years: range one month-13.5 years) presenting with partial achalasia were examined from 1990 to 1998. The symptomatology leading to esophageal manometry was: dysphagia (n = 9), gastroesophageal reflux (n = 6), swallowing disorder (n = 3). pH-metry (n = 8), esophageal endoscopy (n = 11) and barium transit (n = 12) were also performed. RESULTS: Twelve children were treated with nifedipine, (dysphagia n = 6, gastroesophageal reflux n = 5, swallowing disorder n = 1). At follow-up, a good clinical response was observed in six children while no effect or transient improvement were observed in two and four children respectively. Two of them presented spontaneous clinical resolution of symptoms after nifedipine was stopped but four children needed Heller procedure. Six of 18 patients (dysphagia n = 3, gastroesophageal reflux n = 2, swallowing disorder n = 1) developed achalasia or recurrent symptoms which required Heller surgery. At the first examination, no clinical or manometric features could differentiate these six patients from the remainders who presented a favorable outcome. CONCLUSION: Esophageal primary disorders as partial achalasia in children are observed in various clinical conditions. The possible development of achalasia and persistence of symptoms in some children justify both attentive clinical and manometric follow-up.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Diagnostic dilemmas in dysphagia aortica.

OBJECTIVE: Dysphagia aortica describes swallowing difficulty caused by external compression from a tortuous or aneurysmal aorta. We present 5 cases in which dysphagia to solids accompanied a localised high pressure barrier (HPB) on manometry suggestive of dysphagia aortica, and explore other investigation modalities useful to confirm the diagnosis. METHODS: Four females and 1 male with a median age of 56 years (range 47-58) were investigated. All underwent investigation with endoscopy, chest radiography, CT scanning, barium swallow, and video solid bolus swallow in addition to oesophageal manometry and 24 h ambulatory pH monitoring. RESULTS: Median basal pressure rise at the mid oesophageal HPB was 45 mmHg (range 40-80). In addition to the HPB, 4 patients had manometric abnormalities of swallow activity and 2 patients had significant gastroesophageal reflux disease (GORD). Contrast enhanced computed tomography and barium swallow were normal in all cases. Video bolus swallow showed pronounced obstruction to transit at the aortic arch in 2 cases and excluded significant dysphagia aortica in 2 others. CONCLUSIONS: Dysphagia aortica commonly coexists with motility disorders and GORD. Video solid bolus swallow allowed us to determine the clinical significance of a manometric HPB in 4 out of 5 patients suspected on dysphagia aortica where standard evaluation would have failed. We recommend its use in those patients with a manometric HPB suggestive of dysphagia aortica in whom standard barium swallow is normal.

Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic↗
PubMed1999

Clinical features and oesophageal motility in patients with tight fundoplication.

OBJECTIVE: Tight fundoplication is a well known complication of surgery for gastroesophageal reflux. We have noted, in clinical experience, that some patients operated for gastro-oesophageal reflux develop pharyngo-oesophageal dysphagia. This study was undertaken to elucidate, by comparing motility data in patients with and without tight fundoplication, the pathophysiologic characteristics of the swallowing mechanism and to clarify the cause of dysphagia in these patients. METHODS: Sixteen patients with postoperative persistent dysphagia following a fundoplication have been studied, of those 10 presented a lower oesophageal sphincter resting pressure above or equal to 30 mmHg (group A). Clinical work-up included a questionnaire, oendoscopy, manometry and barium meal or video-roentgenography. Oesophageal manometry was performed using a slow pull through technique while the stationary pull through technique was used for the pharyngo-oesophageal segment. The following parameters were evaluated: (a) amplitude of pharyngeal contraction; (b) upper oesophageal sphincter resting pressure; (c) amplitude of upper oesophageal sphincter contraction; (d) amplitude of oesophageal contraction; (e) lower oesophageal sphincter resting pressure. The results were compared to those of 21 patients who had a fundoplication with normal lower oesophageal sphincter pressure (group B). RESULTS: in group A there were three males and seven females, with a mean age of 51 years (ranging from 28 to 60 years). Previous operations were Nissen in two and Nissen Rossetti in eight patients. Three out of 10 patients of group A presented pharyngo-oesophageal dysphagia. Mean lower oesophageal sphincter 36 versus 21 mmHg and upper oesophageal sphincter 86 versus 42 mmHg resting pressure, pharyngeal 147 versus 76 mmHg and oesophageal amplitude, upper oesophageal contraction 251 versus 103 mmHg were significantly higher in patients of group A versus group B. An increased number of repetitive contractions was also found in group A. The presence of a strong correlation was demonstrated between the pharyngeal amplitude and the closing tone of the upper oesophageal sphincter (R2 0.742 and R2 0.739) in both groups. CONCLUSION: Tight fundoplication is, in our experience, always associated with total fundoplication. The appearance of pharyngo-oesophageal dysphagia in the postoperative period in patients operated on to correct gastroesophageal reflux using a total fundoplication, should not be under-estimated because it suggests an obstruction of the distal oesophagus.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

The influence of esophageal length on outcomes after laparoscopic fundoplication.

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that laparoscopic antireflux surgery has been associated with an increased incidence of postoperative paraesophageal hiatus herniation, and that this comes (at least in part) from not performing an esophageal lengthening procedure in patients with preoperative esophageal shortening. This study was undertaken to determine whether patients with esophageal shortening have an increased risk of reoperation after laparoscopic antireflux surgery. STUDY DESIGN: All patients who underwent a laparoscopic fundoplication between December 1991 and March 1999, and who had undergone preoperative esophageal manometry in our department were included in this study. Preoperative, operative, and followup data were collected prospectively, and original manometry recordings were reviewed to determine the length of the esophagus (the distance between the midpoints of the upper and lower esophageal sphincters). An index of esophageal length versus height was also calculated by dividing esophageal length by height. Esophageal length and the index were then compared with clinical outcomes. In addition, outcomes for the 50 patients with the shortest index was compared with outcomes of the 50 patients with the longest index. RESULTS: This study included 484 patients from an overall experience of 774 laparoscopic antireflux procedures. Postoperative followup ranged from 3 months to 5 years (median 2 years). Mean esophageal length was 23 cm (range 14 to 30 cm). There was a significant correlation between height and esophageal length (r = 0.44, p < 0.0001). Although patients with large hiatus hernias tended to have a shorter esophagus, preoperative endoscopic esophagitis grading did not influence length. Esophageal length did not influence the overall requirement for further surgical reintervention, although an analysis of esophageal length in patients who developed specific complications demonstrated that postoperative paraesophageal herniation was more likely in patients with a shorter esophagus, and reoperation for a tight esophageal hiatus was less likely in patients with a short esophagus. The incidence of paraesophageal hernia in the 50 patients with the shortest index was 8% versus 2% in the 50 patients with the longest index (p = 0.36). CONCLUSIONS: Although the overall reoperation rate after laparoscopic fundoplication was not influenced by esophageal length, this study did demonstrate an association between esophageal shortening and postoperative paraesophageal herniation. But the increased risk of this problem is small, and for this reason a case cannot be made for patients with a manometrically short esophagus to routinely undergo an esophageal lengthening procedure.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Combined videomanometric identification of abnormalities related to pharyngeal retention.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The authors determined the usefulness of performing videoradiography and pharyngeal solid-state manometry during barium swallow in dysphagic patients with pharyngeal retention. METHODS: Results were retrospectively analyzed of simultaneous videoradiography and manometry examinations in 14 patients with retention of barium in the pharynx. Twelve age-matched patients without retention served as a control group. RESULTS: Patients with retention regularly had less opening of the upper esophageal sphincter than patients without retention (7.6 vs 10.3 mm, respectively; P = .003). In patients with retention, the laryngeal elevation was lower (17.1 vs 23.8 mm, respectively; P = .001), and the resting pressure of the upper esophageal sphincter was significantly lower (42.4 vs 54.0 mm Hg, respectively; P = .04). The duration of upper esophageal sphincter relaxation was also shorter in patients with retention (374 vs 603 msec, respectively; P = .003). The peak pharyngeal contraction pressure was not significantly different. CONCLUSION: The constrictors play a minor role in the conveyance of the bolus through the pharynx. Pharyngeal shortening could be the most important mechanism in bolus transport.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Functional results after laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse.

We investigated the functional results after laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse in 29 patients at least 12 months postoperatively. Twenty patients were evaluated completely pre- and postoperatively (median 22 months postoperatively, range 12 to 54 months). Six patients were interviewed by telephone, two patients were lost to follow-up, and one patient died of causes unrelated to rectal prolapse. Patients underwent a proctologic examination, anoscopy, rigid sigmoidoscopy, fluoroscopic defecography, and anorectal manometry pre- and postoperatively, and an additional standardized interview postoperatively. Anorectal manometry showed a significant increase in maximum anal resting and squeeze pressures postoperatively (resting pressure 72 +/- 8 vs. 95 +/- 13 mm Hg, pre- vs. postoperatively; P = 0.046; squeeze pressure 105 +/- 17 vs. 142 +/- 19 mm Hg, pre- vs. postoperatively; P = 0.035), and continence improved postoperatively (Wexner incontinence score 6.0 +/- 1.0 vs. 3.9 +/- 0.8 pre- vs. postoperatively, P = 0.02). Twenty (77%) of 26 patients were satisfied with the operative result, but functional morbidity was observed in four patients, with two patients complaining of severe evacuation problems. Rectal prolapse recurred in one patient 42 months postoperatively (recurrence rate 1 [3.8%] of 26 patients). Functional results were very similar to those obtained after open rectopexy, with symptoms of prolapse and incontinence improved in the great majority of patients.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Perioperative resting pressure predicts long-term postoperative function after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether perioperative manometry is useful in predicting long-term functional status after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). Prospectively collected perioperative anal manometry data from 1439 patients undergoing IPAA from 1986 to 2000 were compared to postoperative functional status at various time intervals from 6 months to 8 years after IPAA. A validated questionnaire was used to obtain information regarding restrictions of diet, work, social and sexual activity, urgency, fecal seepage or incontinence, energy level, satisfaction with surgery, and quality of life. The presence of seepage and the degree of incontinence were compared to the patient's perceived quality of life, health, energy level, and satisfaction with surgery. Low (<40 mm Hg) pre- and postoperative resting pressures were associated with increased seepage, pad use, and incontinence. Patients with low resting pressures also reported diminished quality of life, health, energy level, and satisfaction with surgery. There was a significant association (P < 0.001) between seepage and degree of incontinence and quality of health, quality of life, energy level, and level of satisfaction with surgery. Perioperative resting anal sphincter pressures greater than 40 mm Hg are associated with significantly better function and quality of life after ileal IPAA. Improved functional outcome is associated with better quality-of-life outcomes. Low preoperative resting pressures do not preclude successful outcome after IPAA.

Anal Canal↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Complete fundoplication is not associated with increased dysphagia in patients with abnormal esophageal motility.

Abnormal esophageal motility is a relative contraindication to complete (360-degree) fundoplication because of a purported risk of postoperative dysphagia. Partial fundoplication, however, may be associated with increased postoperative esophageal acid exposure. Our aim was to determine if complete fundoplication is associated with increased postoperative dysphagia in patients with abnormal esophageal motor function. Medical records of 140 patients (79 females; mean age 48 +/- 1.1 years) who underwent fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) were reviewed retrospectively to document demographic data, symptoms, and diagnostic test results. Of the 126 patients who underwent complete fundoplication, 25 met manometric criteria for abnormal esophageal motility (#30 mm Hg mean distal esophageal body pressure or #80% peristalsis), 68 had normal esophageal function, and 33 had incomplete manometric data and were therefore excluded from analysis. Of the 11 patients who underwent partial fundoplication, eight met criteria for abnormal esophageal motility, two had normal esophageal function, and one had incomplete data and was therefore excluded. After a median follow-up of 2 years (range 0.5 to 5 years), patients were asked to report heartburn, difficulty swallowing, and overall satisfaction using a standardized scoring scale. Complete responses were obtained in 72%. Sixty-five patients who underwent complete fundoplication and had manometric data available responded (46 normal manometry; 19 abnormal manometry). Outcomes were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. After complete fundoplication, similar postoperative heartburn, swallowing, and overall satisfaction were reported by patients with normal and abnormal esophageal motility. Likewise, similar outcomes were reported after partial fundoplication. This retrospective study found equally low dysphagia rates regardless of baseline esophageal motility; therefore a randomized trial comparing complete versus partial fundoplication in patients with abnormal esophageal motility is warranted.

Deglutition Disorders↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Esophageal dysmotility and gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) produces a spectrum of symptoms ranging from mild to severe. While the role of the lower esophageal sphincter in the pathogenesis of GERD has been studied extensively, less attention has been paid to esophageal peristalsis, even though peristalsis governs esophageal acid clearance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the following in patients with GERD: (1) the nature of esophageal peristalsis and (2) the relationship between esophageal peristalsis and gastroesophageal reflux, mucosal injury, and symptoms. One thousand six consecutive patients with GERD confirmed by 24-hour pH monitoring were divided into three groups based on the character of esophageal peristalsis as shown by esophageal manometry: (1) normal peristalsis (normal amplitude, duration, and velocity of peristaltic waves); (2) ineffective esophageal motility (IEM; distal esophageal amplitude < 30 mm Hg or >30% simultaneous waves); and (3) nonspecific esophageal motility disorder (NSEMD; motor dysfunction intermediate between the other two groups). Peristalsis was classified as normal in 563 patients (56%), IEM in 216 patients (21%), and NSEMD in 227 patients (23%). Patients with abnormal peristalsis had worse reflux and slower esophageal acid clearance. Heartburn, respiratory symptoms, and mucosal injury were all more severe in patients with IEM. These data show that esophageal peristalsis was severely impaired (IEM) in 21% of patients with GERD, and this group had more severe reflux, slower acid clearance, worse mucosal injury, and more frequent respiratory symptoms. We conclude that esophageal manometry and pH monitoring can be used to stage the severity of GERD, and this, in turn, should help identify those who would benefit most from surgical treatment.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Development of achalasia secondary to laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.

Dysphagia after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) is commonly attributed to edema and/or improperly constructed wraps, and in some instances the cause can be difficult to identify. We report, for the first time, the development of secondary achalasia after LNF as a cause of late-onset postoperative dysphagia. A total of 250 consecutive patients undergoing LNF were analyzed for the development of postoperative dysphagia at a university hospital. Patients were considered to have secondary achalasia if they met the following four criteria: (1) preoperative manometry demonstrating normal peristalsis and normal lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation; (2) lack of esophageal peristalsis on postoperative manometry or fluoroscopy with or without incomplete LES relaxation; (3) no mucosal lesions seen on endoscopy; and (4) dysphagia refractory to dilatation. The following three groups of patients were identified: patients who developed secondary achalasia (group A, n = 7); patients with persistent dysphagia requiring and responding to postoperative dilatation (group B, n = 12 patients); and patients whose postoperative recovery was not complicated by dysphagia (group C, n = 231). The groups were comparable in terms of all preoperative variables except for age. Patients in group A were older than those in group B (57 years [range 27 to 66 years] vs. 36.5 years [range 27 to 63 years], P = 0.028) but were not significantly older than patients in group C (45 years [range 20 to 84 years], P = 0.42). The onset of severe dysphagia was later in group A than in group B (135 days [range 15 to 300 days] vs. 20 days [range 9 to 70 days], P = 0.002). The median weight loss in group A was also significantly greater than in Group B (15 pounds [range 11 to 44 pounds] vs. 4 pounds [range 0 to 15 pounds], P = 0.0007). Two patients in group A who underwent reoperation failed to improve. Botulinum toxin injections were tried in two patients and Heller myotomy in one with good results. Nine patients in group B improved promptly after one dilatation, and three improved after two dilatations. Secondary achalasia should be considered as one of the causes of persistent dysphagia after an apparently successful antireflux operation. Secondary achalasia tends to occur in older patients and is characterized by a delayed onset of symptoms. Imaging studies are a reliable means of excluding mechanical obstruction as a cause of secondary achalasia, and a negative result should raise the suspicion of secondary achalasia. Esophageal motility studies are necessary to confirm the diagnosis. Failure to consider the diagnosis of secondary achalasia can lead to multiple fruitless attempts at dilatation or even inappropriate reoperations.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Natural history of chronic idiopathic intestinal pseudo-obstruction in adults: a single center study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Chronic idiopathic intestinal pseudo-obstruction (CIIP) is a rare disease characterized by episodes resembling mechanical obstruction in the absence of organic, systemic, or metabolic disorders. Intestinal motor abnormalities have long been identified in CIIP patients. Little is known of the natural history of the disease in adults. This study evaluated the clinical course of CIIP over time. METHODS: Fifty-nine consecutive CIIP patients without underlying collagen, vascular diseases, or mitochondrial cytopathies were evaluated between 1985 and 2001. Family history, onset of digestive symptoms, previous surgeries, episodes suggestive of subacute intestinal obstruction, digestive symptoms, body mass index, and feeding habits were recorded. Small bowel manometry was performed by a perfusion technique, and abnormal motor patterns were visually identified. Full-thickness biopsies were available in 11 cases and were processed for immunohistochemical analysis of myogenic and neurogenic components of the gut wall. RESULTS: Patients were prospectively followed up for a median of 4.6 years (range, 1-13 years). Diagnosis was often made several years after symptom onset (median, 8 years). Thus, the majority of patients (88%) underwent useless and potentially dangerous surgeries (mean, 2.96 per patient). Manometry invariably showed abnormal motor patterns. Pathologic findings included neuropathies in all investigated cases and abnormalities of interstitial cells of Cajal in 5 of 11 cases. Long-term outcome was generally poor despite surgical and medical therapies; 4 patients died of disease-related complications, 4 underwent small bowel transplantation, almost one third required long-term home parenteral nutrition, and two thirds had some sort of nutritional limitations. CONCLUSIONS: CIIP is a severe, often unrecognized disease characterized by disabling and potentially life-threatening complications over time.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Acute food bolus impaction: aetiology and management.

A prospective study into the aetiology of acute food bolus obstruction (AFBO) was carried out on 17 consecutive patients who presented with this complaint. There were nine males and eight females. Twelve patients (71 per cent) had symptoms of oesophageal disease and 10 patients (59 per cent) had prior food bolus obstruction. Investigations included endoscopy, barium swallow, oesophageal pH and manometry studies. Evidence of oesophageal pathology was found in 12/14 (86 per cent) of patients investigated. No patients had malignancy and the most common abnormality, gastroesophageal reflux (GOR) was found in eight out of 14 (57 per cent) of cases. Oesophageal dysmotility was seen in five out of 12 (42 per cent) patients who had manometric studies. With such a high incidence of recurrence of AFBO, we suggest that patients with this condition be investigated to exclude malignancy and to identify benign oesophageal pathology using techniques such as oesophageal pH and manometry. Appropriate treatment of oesophageal disease may help prevent recurrence of this distressing condition.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Abnormal propagation pattern of duodenal pressure waves in the irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) [correction of (IBD)].

The propagation pattern of individual pressure waves in the gastroduodenal area in IBS is unexplored. We performed antroduodenojejunal manometry on 26 patients with IBS--13 with diarrhea predominant IBS (IBS-D) and 13 with constipation predominant IBS (IBS-C)--and 32 healthy controls. Neuropathic-like motor abnormalities were found in 38% of the patients with conventional manometric evaluation. With high-resolution analysis additional abnormalities were observed in the majority of the patients, with increased frequency of retrograde pressure waves postprandially in both IBS subgroups and in phase II in IBS-D. A correlation between subjective gastrointestinal symptoms and the frequency of retrograde pressure waves in phase II in IBS-D was demonstrated. Motility indices and the number of long clusters were also higher in patients compared to controls. To conclude, an abnormal propagation pattern of individual duodenal pressure waves in IBS patients was demonstrated and found to be related to symptom severity in diarrhea-predominant IBS. High-resolution analysis adds information to standard manometry.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Role of diaphragmatic crura and lower esophageal sphincter in gastroesophageal reflux disease: manometric and pH-metric study of small hiatal hernia.

The rapid pull-through (RPT) technique during esophageal manometry helps to identify various pressure profiles of hiatal hernia (HH), based on the presence of two high pressure zones: the diaphragmatic crura (DC) and the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). Our aim was to correlate different HH profiles with frequency of reflux episodes in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Seventy-eight patients with GERD and HH underwent esophageal manometry with RPT and were grouped according to the prevalent pressure profile of HH. Twenty-four-hour pH-metry served to quantify traditional (TR) and nontraditional refluxes (drop of 1 pH unit with pH > 4 or pH < 4 and time < 5 sec) (NTR) during total, upright, and recumbent periods. The group with a prevalent "flat" HH profile, representing LES and DC impairment, had significantly more TRs in total time of reflux (P < 0.01) and in recumbent and upright periods (P < 0.05) compared to the group with a prevalence of the two pressure peaks, corresponding to LES and DC efficiency. However, the group with the flat profile had significantly more NTRs + TRs than the group with pressure peaks in total time (P < 0.01) and recumbent position (P < 0.001) but not in the upright position. Hiatal hernia predisposes to GERD, but only the associated impairment of the LES and diaphragmatic crura pressures represents a condition of high risk for gastroesophageal reflux events.

Diaphragm↗
PubMed1997

Discordance of pressure recordings from biliary and pancreatic duct segments in patients with suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction.

It remains controversial whether manometric parameters recorded from the pancreatic and biliary segment of the sphincter of Oddi (SO) differ. We therefore studied 48 consecutive patients (40 women, 43 +/- 11 years) with suspected SO dysfunction, in 33 of whom successful dual-duct SO manometry was obtained. Measures of concordance between the two duct segments were moderate for basal sphincter pressure (K = 0.31) and for contractile frequency (0.35), and were low for peak pressure (0.15) and for proportion of retrograde propagation (-0.19). There was also low concordance (-0.13) for the overall manometric diagnosis, and in 48% (CI 31-66%) of patients a conflicting diagnosis (normal/abnormal) was obtained from the two ducts. There was no evidence of a differential motor effect of CCK on either duct, nor were there significant differences in the rate of manometric abnormality according to the order of initial duct cannulation. These results indicate that, if technically feasible, dual-duct manometry of the sphincter of Oddi is required for diagnostic precision.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Effects of biofeedback therapy on anorectal function in obstructive defecation.

Biofeedback therapy improves symptoms in patients with constipation and obstructive defecation. Whether it also improves anorectal function is unclear. Our purpose was to investigate prospectively the effects of biofeedback therapy on subjective and objective parameters of anorectal function in 25 consecutive patients with obstructive defecation. Biofeedback therapy consisted of pelvic floor relaxation exercises (phase I) and neuromuscular conditioning of rectal sensation and rectoanal coordination, with a solid state manometry system and simulated defecation maneuvers (phase II). The number of sessions was customized for each patient. Clinical improvement was assessed from the changes in anorectal manometry, balloon (50 cc) expulsion test, and the symptom and stool diaries. The number of therapy sessions varied [mean (range) = 6 (2-10)]. After therapy, when straining as if to defecate, the percentage anal relaxation, intrarectal pressure, and defecation index increased (P < 0.001). The balloon expulsion time, laxative consumption, and straining effort decreased (P < 0.001). Before therapy, 16/25 (64%) patients had impaired rectal sensation, and after therapy this improved (P < 0.001). After therapy, 15/25 (60%) patients reported > or = 75% satisfaction with bowel habit and 8/25 (32%) reported > or = 50% satisfaction (P < 0.001); 15/16 (94%) patients discontinued digital disimpaction. Biofeedback therapy not only improves subjective but also objective parameters of anorectal function in at least 76% of patients by rectifying the underlying pathophysiologic disturbance(s). Sensory conditioning and customizing the number of sessions may offer additional benefits.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Manometric study of hiatal hernia and its correlation with esophageal peristalsis.

The pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is considered multifactorial, but alterations of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) and hiatal hernia play a prominent role. The correlations between hiatal hernia and the other pathogenetic factors are as yet unclear, and they need to be investigated by a methodological approach based on new anatomic and functional criteria. Our aim was to study, by stationary manometry, the relationships between small reducible hiatal hernia, identified by endoscopy, and esophageal peristalsis, in patients with and without GERD. According to the absence or presence of esophagitis (E), and the absence or presence of hiatal hernia (H), 58 subjects were divided into four groups: controls 10; H 14; E 10; and HE 24. Stationary manometry was performed by the rapid pull-through (RPT) technique, with catheter water perfused, to study the lower esophageal high pressure zone [lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and diaphragmatic crura] and the parameters of esophageal peristalsis. In patients with hiatal hernia, the various combinations of peak and/or deflection of manometric line pressure identified five EGJ profiles, only one of which reveals (by one-peak profile due to superimposed LES and diaphragmatic crura) the reducibility of the hernia. The frequency of the five profiles was calculated in the HE and H groups: a two-peak profile was significantly more prevalent in these patients, although less so in the group with esophagitis. In E patients the distal amplitude and the distal propagation of esophageal waves were significantly lower than in the other three groups (P < 0.05 vs controls and group HE; P < 0.01 vs group H). Furthermore, the distal amplitude was significantly higher in the group H than in the HE (P < 0.01). Our results show a better definition of hiatal hernia morphology, via the RPT technique, disclosing five pressure profiles. In addition, a significant link was found between small reducible hiatal hernia without GERD and wave amplitude of the distal esophagus. The amplification of peristaltic clearing may be considered the initial protective process against acid reflux; the breakdown of this mechanism may trigger the pathological sequence of GERD.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Dysphagia and advancing age: are manometric abnormalities more common in older patients?

The universal process of aging may result in physiologic deterioration. Dysphagia may be more common in older patients. The effect of aging on esophageal manometry is not well established. The aim of this study was to determine if esophageal motility studies and associated symptoms in older patients with dysphagia differ significantly from younger patients. Patients who were 65 years of age or older (N = 53) were compared with patients who were 18-45 years of age (N = 53). Presenting symptoms, manometric findings, and diagnoses were compared between the two groups. In the older group, there were 29 women (55%), in the younger group there were 35 women (66%). The mean age of the older group was 75 +/- 7 years, the mean age in the younger group was 34 +/- 7 years. All patients reported dysphagia to solids. No significant differences were found in the reporting of associated symptoms. There were no significant differences in average lower esophageal sphincter (LES) resting pressure, residual LES pressure, LES relaxation, or peristalsis between groups. Older patients were as likely to have a normal study as younger patients (18% vs 23%, P = NS) and were also as likely to have the diagnosis of achalasia (32% vs 34%, P = NS). In conclusion, older and younger patients referred for manometric study of dysphagia have similar manometric findings. Esophageal manometry can be helpful in determining abnormalities in motility in both older and younger patients.

Adolescent↗