Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Promotion”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,765 records · Page 98Linked to original sources

Regulation of the promoters for the human bone morphogenetic protein 2 and 4 genes.

The bone morphogenetic proteins 2 and 4 are known to be important in bone formation and are expressed in both the developing and adult mammalian bone. Understanding the regulation of these genes in osteoblasts may yield methods by which we can control expression to induce bone formation. We have isolated and characterized the human BMP-2 and BMP-4 promoters and report substantially more upstream sequence information than that which has been published. Human osteoblasts were found to have a single transcript initiation site that is conserved across species, rather than multiple start sites, as has previously been reported (Feng, J.Q., Harris, M.A., Ghosh-Choudhury, N., Feng, M., Mundy, G.R., Harris, S.E., 1994. Structure and sequence of mouse morphogenetic protein-2 gene (BMP-2): comparison of the structures and promoter regions of BMP-2 and BMP-4 genes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1218, 221-224; Heller, L.C., Li, Y., Abrams, K.L., Rogers, M.B., 1999. Transcriptional regulation of the Bmp2 gene. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 1394-1400; Sugiura, T., 1999. Cloning and functional characterization of the 5'-flanking region of the human bone morphogenetic protein-2 gene. Biochem. J. 338, 433-440). A series of promoter deletions for both human BMP-2 and BMP-4 fused to the luciferase reporter gene were analyzed thoroughly in human and murine osteoblastic cell lines. Several compounds and growth factors that stimulate general or osteogenic pathways were used to treat cells transfected with the promoter constructs. Retinoic acid compounds and the phorbol ester, PMA were found to stimulate BMP-2 and, to a lesser degree, BMP-4. The combination of all trans-RA and PMA caused a synergistic increase in BMP-2 promoter activity and endogenous mRNA. The RA stimulation appears to be an indirect effect on the BMP-2 promoter, as the most highly conserved RRE in the BMP-2 promoter was unable to functionally bind or compete for protein binding. Potential binding sites in both promoters for the bone-specific transcription factor, Cbfa-1, were found to specifically bind Cbfa-1 protein in osteoblast nuclear extracts; however, deletion of these sites did not significantly affect transcriptional activity of the promoters in osteoblasts. These data thus present new sequence and regulatory information for the human BMP-2 and BMP-4 promoters and clarify the human BMP-2 gene transcriptional start site in osteoblasts.

Animals↗

Structural and functional analysis of metal regulatory elements in the promoter region of genes encoding metallothionein isoforms in the Antarctic fish Chionodraco hamatus (icefish).

To investigate the regulation of Chionodraco hamatus metallothionein (MT) encoding genes about 1000-bp regions of both MT-I and MT-II gene promoters were cloned and sequenced. Both promoters were rich in A-T content, and lacked the canonical TATA box; several putative cis-regulatory sequences were also present. In the MT-I promoter, four MREs were identified within the first 300 bp from the ATG codon. In the MT-II promoter, seven MREs were organized into two clusters, one containing three MREs located close to the ATG codon, and the other consisting of four MREs lying 500-900 bp upstream of the transcription starting point. The alignment of the MT-I and MT-II promoter regions showed 57% identity, which increased to 87% in the 300-bp region upstream of the ATG. Only the three proximal putative MREs identified were conserved both in position and sequence. Functional analysis of MT-I and MT-II promoters was performed by introducing deletion mutants of the 5'-flanking regions into vector pGL-3, directly upstream of the firefly luciferase reporter gene. Each construct was tested in the HepG2 cell lines in the absence or presence of zinc or cadmium ions. Maximum inducibility of the MT-II gene promoter was achieved with a construct containing both the proximal and the distal MRE clusters. The lack of the most distally located MRE dramatically affected MT-II promoter sensitivity to metals; removal of the distal cluster of MREs also reduced metal inducibility. The MT-I promoter was more compact, since maximal activity and metal inducibility depended on the presence of the proximal cluster of four MREs. This study suggests that the different organization of the MT-I and MT-II gene promoter regions might account for the observed differences in the basal and metal-induced expression of MT-I and MT-II isoforms in the C. hamatus liver.

Animals↗

Generation of a synthetic mammalian promoter library by modification of sequences spacing transcription factor binding sites.

The development of a set of synthetic mammalian promoters with different specific activities is described. The library is based on a synthetic promoter, JeT, constructed as a 200 bp chimeric promoter built from fragments of the viral SV40 early promoter and the human beta-actin and ubiquitin C promoters. The JeT promoter was made by separating the included consensus boxes by the same distances in base pairs as found in the wild-type promoters, thus preserving transcription factor interaction. The resulting promoter was shown to drive reporter expression to high levels in enhanced green fluorescent protein and secreted alkaline phosphatase reporter assays. By replacing sequences separating the transcription factor binding sites with randomized sequences of the same length, sets of new promoters with different strengths, spanning a 10-fold range of transcriptional activity in cell culture, was obtained. The measured activity of each promoter in the library was highly specific and reproducible when tested in HiB5 and ARPE-19 cell culture.

Actins↗

An L1 element disrupts human bone sialoprotein promoter: lack of tissue-specific regulation by distalless5 (Dlx5) and runt homeodomain protein2 (Runx2)/core binding factor a1 (Cbfa1) elements.

Bone sialoprotein (BSP) is a phosphorylated and sulphated glycoprotein with hydroxyapatite nucleating properties that is specifically expressed in association with physiological and pathological mineralization. Although previous studies have indicated that tissue-specific expression of murine BSP is regulated through a proximal homeodomain element that binds distalless5 (Dlx5) transcription analysis of the homologous human promoter revealed modest enhancement in osteogenic cells. Moreover, whereas forced expression of an antisense Dlx5 vector increased transcription, Dlx5 expression did not alter transcription significantly. Since extended promoter sequences are required to confer absolute tissue-specific expression of BSP in vivo, we characterized the upstream region of the human BSP gene. In contrast to the rat and mouse promoters, which show conserved sequences extending several kbs upstream, analysis of approximately 3 kb of the human promoter showed no sequence conservation beyond -0.99 kb. Southern blot analysis of genomic DNA from four different BAC clones showed that this sequence was not an aberration in the human genomic library used to isolate the BSP gene. Using clone BAC H-NH0811I08, the human BSP promoter sequence was extended approximately 8 kb upstream from which the non-homologous region was characterized as a 3.48 kb insert coding for an L1 retrotransposon element. Transcriptional analyses of chimeric promoter constructs revealed that the retrotransposon element suppresses transcription <80%. Upstream of the inserted DNA several regions, varying in length from 26 to 161 bps, were conserved within the mouse and human promoters. One of these conserved regions included a runt homeodomain protein2 (Runx2)/core binding factor a1 (Cbfa1) elements consensus element in reverse orientation. Whereas a multimeric form of the element was transcriptionally active in response to Runx2/Cbfa1 when ligated to the BSP basal promoter, the single element in the context of the extended promoter was unresponsive. These studies have characterized the upstream promoter of the human BSP gene, which is interrupted by a unique high-frequency DNA insert that suppresses BSP gene transcription.

Animals↗

Functional analysis of the KCS-like element of the interferon-inducible RNA-specific adenosine deaminase ADAR1 promoter.

The ADAR1 gene encodes an RNA-specific adenosine deaminase that alters the functional activity of both viral and cellular RNAs by posttranscriptional adenosine-to-inosine RNA editing. The interferon (IFN) responsive PI promoter of the ADAR1 gene possesses an IFN-stimulated response element (ISRE) responsible for IFN-inducibility, as well as an adjacent upstream sequence, designated kinase conserved sequence-like (KCS-l) element. The KCS-l element is similar to the 15-bp KCS element so far unique to the human and mouse RNA-dependent PKR kinase gene promoters. The KCS element of the PKR kinase (PKR) promoter is essential for both basal and IFN-inducible PKR promoter activity. We have now examined the functional properties of the KCS-l element of the ADAR1 PI promoter. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) detected constitutively expressed nuclear proteins that bound selectively to the ADAR1 KCS-l element. Competition EMSA and antibody supershift assays indicated that ADAR1 KCS-l-binding proteins shared some properties with PKR KCS-binding proteins. However, transient transfection analyses performed with ADAR1 PI promoter constructs possessing deletion and substitution mutant forms of the KCS-l element revealed that the ADAR1 KCS-l element was not essential for either basal or IFN-inducible promoter activity. Substitution of the ADAR1 KCS-l element with the PKR KCS element increased both basal and inducible ADAR1 PI promoter activity. These results suggest that the KCS-l element of the ADAR1 PI promoter is not functionally equivalent to the KCS element of the PKR promoter.

Adenosine Deaminase↗

Functional identification of the promoter of the gene encoding the Rhesus monkey beta-amyloid precursor protein.

Misregulation of the transcription of the beta-amyloid precursor protein (betaAPP) gene is implicated in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Here we characterize the 5'-flanking region, the first exon and intron of the betaAPP gene of the Rhesus monkey (rhbetaAPP). For functional analysis, transient transfection in PC12 cells was performed with a series of 5'-deletion constructs (fused with a reporter gene), that extended as far upstream as -7900 down to -1bp. Chloramphenicol acetyltransferase/promoter fusion assays showed that both -7900/+104 and -75/+104-bp regions possessed strong promoter activity. However, -2542/+104bp had the strongest promoter activity, whereas -204/+104bp showed a major reduction in activity and -47/+104bp showed almost a complete loss of activity. A region from -75 to +104bp was essential for minimal basic promoter activity because mutation at the activating site of an upstream stimulator factor (USF) within this region abolished the promoter activity. The very upstream region (-5529/-3416bp) displayed a negative effect on promoter activity. Two blocks of the sequence, 641bp (-1131 /-490) and 105bp (-309/-204), acted as positive regulators for promoter activity. Another 61-bp block (-204/-143) acted as a negative regulator. Gel shift assay indicated that the -249-242-bp region contains a binding domain for the AP-2 transcription factor. No second promoter or bidirectional promoter was observed. A region spanning the first exon and part of the first intron (+99 to +6800bp) acted as a negative regulator. These results suggest that a region of -75 to +104bp, which contains the pyrimidine-rich initiator element, the 5'-untranslated region and the binding site for USF, constitute the minimal promoter element and that interactions between multiple positive and negative elements, the USF and initiator element are crucial for transcription of the TATA-less betaAPP promoter.

Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor↗

The multiple untranslated first exons and promoters system of the oestrogen receptor gene in the brain and peripheral tissues of the rat and monkey and the developing rat cerebral cortex.

Recent studies on the human oestrogen receptor (ER) gene have revealed the complex system with the multiple untranslated first exons and promoters in the ER gene expression. Little information is however available on the system in the ER gene of the rat or nonhuman primate. The rat genomic library was first screened by the rat ER cDNA (0-1) probe. One of the four positive clones (lambda rEgE1) was subcloned and sequenced. The nucleotide sequence was found to contain the exon 0, the intron 0, and the exon 1 with its 3'-ends. The novel untranslated first exons, the exon ON and the exon OS, were further identified. These results indicated the presence of at least four subtypes of the rat ER mRNAs; the messages transcribed from promoter P-0 (ER mRNA (0-1)), putative promoter P-1 (ER mRNA (1-1)), promoter P-ON (ER mRNA (ON-1)) and promoter P-OS (ER mRNA (OS-1)). The P-O- or P-1 driven message (0-1) or (1-1) appeared to be expressed most strongly in major oestrogen central- (anterior pituitary, AP, hypothalamus-preoptic area, HPOA, and amygdala, AMG) and peripheral targets (uterus and ovary). The message (ON-1) was strongly expressed in the liver and kidney, but not in the HPOA, AMG, cerebral cortex, CC, and cerebellum, Ce. The OS-1 message was expressed variably but generally in the tissues examined except for the CC and Ce. Thus, the region- and tissue specific expression of the rat ER gene is likely to be regulated by the multiple untranslated exons and promoters system. Furthermore, when the ER mRNA subtypes were examined in the rat neonatal CC where the ER protein level rose transiently, considered as a model for the development of the ER or progestin receptor A and B isoforms, the expression of the ER mRNAs seemed to be differential postnatally, implicating some stage dependent usage of the promoters in the development. In the monkey, we identified the untranslated first exon OS, the homologue of the rat exon OS. Interestingly, the exon C was found to consist of two different exons, the exon OK and the exon OG. By the alternative usage of the promoters and the alternative splicing, at least six ER mRNA subtypes, that is, ER mRNAs (0-1), (1-1), (OS-1), (OS-OG-1), (OK-1) and (OK-OG-1) were identified in the monkey tissues. These messages were also differentially distributed in the monkey brain and other tissues. It was noteworthy that the P-OK driven messages were expressed almost exclusively in the monkey liver. These results have suggested that the systems of the multiple untranslated first exons and promoters and the alternative splicing are involved in the regulation of the region- and tissue specific expression of the ER gene in the brain and peripheral tissues of the rat and monkey. Stage-related usage of the promoters was also suggested in the ER gene expression in the CC of the postnatal rat in development.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Identifying the opportunities for health promoting emergency departments.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To describe the opportunities for health promotion in emergency departments (EDs). METHODS: A comprehensive literature review and consultation with ED staff (seven focus groups) and other health professionals (workshop). RESULTS: Opportunities for patient health information and education within EDs are described in the literature. In contrast, the health promoting hospitals literature showcases integrated approaches for health promotion, emphasizing organisational structures, and culture changes to support effective health promotion. This type of integration has not developed in EDs, where individual issues based health promotion projects have emerged. ED staff readily described the:existing health promotion interventions and possible improvements and opportunities for potential health promotion interventions related to the needs of their patients, the community or their organisation. Other health professionals supported EDs taking a greater role in health promotion and suggested organisational partnerships that would assist in developing this. CONCLUSION: There are numerous opportunities to enhance health promotion in EDs. With support, EDs could deliver comprehensive health promotion programs for patients, staff, and communities.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Viability of E. coli cells containing phage RNA polymerase and promoter: interference of plasmid replication by transcription.

Strong transcription of phage promoters often renders the host E. coli cells containing the phage RNA polymerase inviable. When expression of the phage SP6 RNA polymerase gene in one plasmid was induced in the E. coli JM109 cells, cells that bear an active SP6 promoter were inviable. When it was not induced (the polymerase was still produced in low levels), viability of the host cells and stability of the promoter-bearing plasmids depended on the orientation of the promoter with respect to that of the replication origin and on the sequence of the origin. A group of SP6 promoter-bearing plasmids (group I plasmids) that had the promoter directed towards the ColE1 replication origin, rendered the polymerase-containing host cells inviable in selective media. When the sequence of the origin was different (group II plasmids), this adverse effect was not observed. When the promoter direction was same as the replication origin and the ampicillin-resistant gene (group III plasmids), many satellites formed around the colonies on ampicillin-containing agar plates. These effects were caused by strong transcription of the phage SP6 promoter by its RNA polymerase, since they were reduced or eliminated by inserting an active terminator just downstream of the promoter. The viability of host cells and copy number of the promoter/terminator-bearing plasmids appear to be quantitatively related with efficiency of initiation and termination of the phage transcription. These systems may be useful for in vivo screening for mutant variants of the phage promoter, polymerase and terminator that are affected in their efficiency.

Bacteriophages↗

Strength and specificity of different gene promoters in oral cancer cells.

Gene therapy of oral cancer will require expression of genes by promoters that are both powerful and relatively tumor specific. We compared the level of expression of a reporter gene from promoters of human cytomegalovirus (CMV), SV40 virus, mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV), human papillomaviruses (HPV) types 16 and 18, and the human multi-drug-resistance gene (mdr1), in several lines of oral cancer cells. In the oral cancer cell line 686LN the rank order of expression levels was: CMV > SV40 > HPV > mdr1 > MMTV. Unlike in previous reports the mdr1 promoter was no more active in two cancer cell lines with mutations in the p53 gene than in two other lines with wild-type p53, and its expression level could not be increased by either doxorubicin or taxol. On the other hand, expression from the MMTV promoter was increased over 10-fold by the presence of 1 microM dexamethasone. Thus, by an appropriate choice of promoter and inducer a wide variety of expression levels, over a 3-log range, could be attained in 686LN cells. The oral cancer-specificity of each promoter was judged by comparing expression in the neuroblastoma line IMR32. The most specific promoters were those from papillomaviruses, which were up to 45 times more active in the oral cancer cells, and the least specific was the CMV promoter. In order to find if an HPV-derived promoter was sufficient to produce expression of a suicide phenotype the 686 promoter was cloned adjacent to the thymidine kinase gene of herpes simplex and the construct was expressed from an adenovirus vector. The vector reduced the growth of 686LN cells over a 5-day period by up to 32% when optimal concentrations of virus and ganciclovir were used. These data will be valuable in the design of new constructs for gene therapy of oral cancer.

Gene Expression↗

Target gene identification from expression array data by promoter analysis.

DNA microchips and expression arrays yield enormous amounts of data linking cDNA sequences to gene expression patterns. This now allows the characterization of gene expression in normal and diseased tissues as well as the response of tissues to the application of therapeutic reagents. Software currently exists to analyze DNA array/chip data with respect to corresponding mRNA sequences, which facilitates the precise determination of when and where certain groups of genes are expressed. The information concerning transcriptional regulatory networks responsible for the observed expression patterns is not contained within the cDNA sequences used to generate the arrays, but resides often within the promoter sequences of the individual genes (and/or enhancers). The complete sequence of the human genome will provide the molecular basis for the identification of such regulatory regions. Promoter sequences for specific cDNAs can be obtained reliably from genomic sequences simply by exon mapping. Promoter prediction tools can also be used to locate promoters directly in the genomic sequence in many cases in which cDNAs are 5'-incomplete. Once sufficient numbers of promoter sequences have been obtained, the comparative promoter analysis of the co-regulated genes and groups of genes can be applied in order to generate models describing the higher order levels of the transcription factor binding site organization within these promoter regions. As evident from several examples, this approach can identify promoter modules responsible for the common regulation of promoters solely by the application of bioinformatics methods. Such modules represent the molecular mechanisms through which regulatory networks influence gene expression. Another advantage of this approach is that it also provides a powerful alternative for elucidating functional features of genes with no detectable sequence similarity, by linking them to other genes on the basis of their common promoter structures.

Computational Biology↗

Tests of a model of specific contacts in T7 RNA polymerase-promoter interactions.

The T7, T3, and SP6 RNA polymerases represent a highly homologous family of enzymes that recognize similarly homologous promoter DNA sequences. Despite these similarities, the enzymes are highly specific for their respective promoters. Studies of mutant RNA polymerases have linked a specific amino acid residue in the protein to recognition of bases at positions -11 and -10 in the promoter [Raskin, C. A., et al. (1992) J. Mol. Biol. 228, 506-515]. In kinetic analyses of transcription from synthetic promoters containing base-analog substitutions, we have recently shown that at positions -11 and -10 of the T3 promoter, T3 RNA polymerase recognizes functional groups along the nontemplate strand wall of the major groove [Schick, C., & Martin, C. T. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 4275-4780]. We now extend these studies to the homologous region of the T7 promoter. The results confirm extrapolations from the T3 system and show that T7 RNA polymerase recognizes corresponding functional groups at positions -11 and -10 of the T7 promoter. The results are consistent with a direct readout model for recognition of these bases [Raskin, C. A., et al. (1992) J. Mol. Biol., 228, 506-515], in which the 6-carbonyl and 7-imino groups of the nontemplate guanine at position -11 and the 6-amino group of the nontemplate adenine at position -10 of the T7 promoter are directly involved in binding. The results further support an overall model for promoter recognition in which the enzyme binds to one face of the duplex DNA in this upstream region of the promoter.

Base Sequence↗

Ets domain transcription factor PE1 suppresses human interstitial collagenase promoter activity by antagonizing protein-DNA interactions at a critical AP1 element.

In MC3T3E1 calvarial osteoblasts, fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) signaling elicits multiple transcriptional responses, including upregulation of the interstitial collagenase/matrix metalloproteinase 1 (MMP1) promoter. FGF responsiveness maps to a bipartite Ets/AP1 element at base pairs -123 to -61 in the human MMP1 promoter. Under basal conditions, the MMP1 promoter is repressed in part via protein-DNA interactions at the Ets cognate, and minimally two mechanisms convey MMP1 promoter upregulation by FGF2: (a) transcriptional activation via Fra1/c-Jun containing DNA-protein interactions at the AP1 cognate and (b) derepression of promoter activity regulated by the Ets cognate. To identify osteoblast Ets repressors that potentially participate in gene expression in the osteoblast, we performed reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis of mRNA isolated from MC3T3E1 cells, using degenerative amplimers to the conserved Ets DNA binding domain to survey the Ets genes expressed by these cells. Six distinct Ets mRNAs were identified: Ets2, Fli1, GABPalpha, SAP1, Elk1, and PE1. Of these, only PE1 has extensive homology to the known Ras-regulated Ets transcriptional repressor, ERF. Therefore, we cloned and characterized PE1 cDNA from a mouse brain library and performed functional analysis of this particular Ets family member. A 2 kb transcript was isolated from brain that encodes a approximately 57 kDa protein; the predicted protein contains the known N-terminal Ets domain of PE1 and a novel C-terminal domain with signficant homology to murine ERF. The murine PE1 open reading frame (ORF) is much larger than the previously reported human PE1 ORF. Consistent with this, affinity-purified rabbit anti-mouse PE1 antibody specifically recognizes an approximately 66 kDa protein present only in the nuclear fraction of MC3T3E1 osteoblasts. Recombinant PE1 binds authentic AGGAWG Ets DNA cognates, and transient transfection studies demonstrate that PE1 represses MMP1 promoter activity. Surprisingly, although deletion of the MMP1 Ets cognate at nucleotides -88 to -83 abrogates FGF2 induction, it does not prevent suppression of the AP1-dependent MMP1 promoter by PE1. PE1 regulation maps to the MMP1 promoter region -75 to -61, suggesting that PE1 suppresses transcription via protein-protein interactions with AP1. Consistent with this, recombinant GST-PE1 specifically inhibits the formation of protein-DNA interactions on the MMP1 AP1 site (-72 to -66) when present in an admixture with MC3T3E1 crude nuclear extract. In toto, these data indicate that PE1 participates in the transcriptional regulation of the MMP1 promoter in osteoblasts. As observed with other transcriptional repressors of MMP1 gene expression, transcriptional suppression by PE1 occurs via inhibition of AP1-dependent promoter activity.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Sp1 trans-activation of cell cycle regulated promoters is selectively repressed by Sp3.

The transcription factor Sp1 plays a key role in the activation of many cellular and viral gene promoters, including those that are regulated during the cell cycle. However, recent evidence indicates that Sp1 belongs to a larger family of factors which bind G/C box elements in order to either activate or repress transcription. Sp3, a member of this family, functions to repress transcriptional activation in two viral promoters, most likely by competing with Sp1 for GC box/Sp binding sites. However, the physiological role of Sp3 in the repression of endogenous cellular promoters has not been experimentally addressed. In the present study, we analyze the activity and binding of Sp3 on several eukaryotic promoters that contain G/C boxes and are known to be regulated during cellular proliferation and the cell cycle. Using antibodies specific for Sp1 and Sp3, we observe that both of these factors localize to the cell nucleus and have a similar, dispersed subnuclear distribution. Further, using gel mobility shift assays, we show that both Sp1 and Sp3 interact specifically with the histone H4 promoter. Transient cotransfections of Drosophila cells with Sp1 and Sp3 expression vectors and with the histone H4, thymidine kinase (TK), or dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) promoters show that only the DHFR promoter, containing multiple functional GC boxes, displays Sp3 repression of Sp1 activation. In contrast, the single G/C boxes within the histone H4 or TK promoters, which confer transcriptional activation via Sp1 binding, are not responsive to repression by Sp3. Therefore, we demonstrate that the endogenous cellular DHFR promoter is selectively responsive to Sp3 repression. The data suggest that Sp3 may contribute to the control of proliferation- and/or cell-regulated promoters depending upon the context and/or number of functional Sp1 binding sites.

Animals↗

Selection and characterization of a mutant T7 RNA polymerase that recognizes an expanded range of T7 promoter-like sequences.

The compatible plasmids pKGP1-1 and pCM-X# will confer chloramphenicol resistance to Escherichia coli harboring the two plasmids if the T7 RNA polymerase produced from pKGP1-1 can recognize the T7 promoter carried on pCM-X# and transcribe the CAT gene that is cloned behind the promoter [Ikeda et al. (1992) Biochemistry 31, 9073-9080]. When E. coli harbor pKGP1-1 and a pCM-X# plasmid that carries a point mutation in the T7 promoter that destroys promoter activity (an inactive pCM-X#), the T7 RNA polymerase will not utilize the T7 promoter point mutant, will not produce CAT, and will not induce chloramphenicol resistance. The selection of mutants of T7 RNA polymerase that exhibit altered promoter recognition was pursued by randomly mutagenizing pKGP1-1 with aqueous hydroxylamine, cotransforming E. coli with the mutagenized pKGP1-1 and a mixture of seven different inactive pCM-X# plasmids, and isolating and characterizing the RNA polymerase that was present in those colonies that exhibited chloramphenicol resistance. It was established that E. coli harboring the mutant plasmid pKGP-HA1mut4 and an inactive pCM-X# are chloramphenicol-resistant and that the mutation responsible for the expression of CAT from the inactive pCM-X# plasmid is a G to A transition at nucleotide 664 of T7 gene 1 that converts glutamic acid (222) to lysine. Apparently this mutation expands the range of T7 promoter sequences that can be utilized by the enzyme. The mutant T7 RNA polymerase, GP1(Lys222), utilizes all seven inactive T7 promoter point mutants more efficiently than wild-type T7 RNA polymerase both in vivo and in vitro. Furthermore, the correlation of in vivo and in vitro promoter utilization suggests that the restoration of chloramphenicol resistance in the cotransformed E. coli results from the ability of GP1(Lys222) to initiate transcription from T7 promoter point mutants that are normally inactive.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Initiation of transcription at the human terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase gene promoter: a novel role for the TATA binding protein.

Control of initiation of transcription of the human terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT) gene was investigated by using an in vitro transcription assay. The precise contribution of discrete basal promoter elements to transcription initiation was determined by testing deletion and substitution mutations. The primary element, contained within the region spanning -34 to -14 bp relative to the transcription start site, accounted for 80% of basal promoter activity. TdT promoter activity required the sequence ACCCT at -24 to -20 bp since a dramatic decrease in transcription initiation was observed after mutation of this sequence, whereas mutation of the adjacent sequence from -32 to -25 bp did not alter promoter activity. The secondary element contained sequences surrounding the transcription start site and had 20% of promoter activity. Deletion of both elements completely abolished transcription initiation. Initiator characteristics of the secondary element were revealed by using the in vitro assay: promoter sequences at the transcription start site were sufficient to direct accurate initiation at a single site. Mutation of the sequence GGGTG spanning the transcription start site resulted in loss of transcription initiation. Both the primary and secondary elements were nonhomologous to corresponding regions from the mouse TdT gene promoter. While the human basal promoter functioned in the absence of TATA consensus sequences or GC-rich SP1 binding sites, it was dependent on active TFIID. In contrast to other TATA-less promoters, purified TATA binding protein substituted for the TFIID complex and restored promoter activity to TFIID-inactivated nuclear extracts.

Base Sequence↗

Continuous in vitro evolution of bacteriophage RNA polymerase promoters.

Rapid in vitro evolution of bacteriophage T7, T3, and SP6 RNA polymerase promoters was achieved by a method that allows continuous enrichment of DNAs that contain functional promoter elements. This method exploits the ability of a special class of nucleic acid molecules to replicate continuously in the presence of both a reverse transcriptase and a DNA-dependent RNA polymerase. Replication involves the synthesis of both RNA and cDNA intermediates. The cDNA strand contains an embedded promoter sequence, which becomes converted to a functional double-stranded promoter element, leading to the production of RNA transcripts. Synthetic cDNAs, including those that contain randomized promoter sequences, can be used to initiate the amplification cycle. However, only those cDNAs that contain functional promoter sequences are able to produce RNA transcripts. Furthermore, each RNA transcript encodes the RNA polymerase promoter sequence that was responsible for initiation of its own transcription. Thus, the population of amplifying molecules quickly becomes enriched for those templates that encode functional promoters. Optimal promoter sequences for phage T7, T3, and SP6 RNA polymerase were identified after a 2-h amplification reaction, initiated in each case with a pool of synthetic cDNAs encoding greater than 10(10) promoter sequence variants.

Bacteriophage T3↗

The mouse androgen receptor gene contains a second functional promoter which is regulated by dihydrotestosterone.

The androgen receptor (AR) is a developmental and tissue-specific transcription factor which is activated by binding testosterone or dihydrotestosterone. Several different methods of transcriptional regulation of the AR have been shown, including regulation by androgens, follicle-stimulating hormone, epidermal growth factor, and the cAMP pathway. In order to further characterize the transcriptional regulation of the AR, portions of the mouse androgen receptor (mAR) promoter were cloned into the promoterless pBLCAT3 vector and assayed for chloramphenicol acetyltransferase activity. The results indicate that in addition to the previously characterized promoter (+1) there is a second distinct promoter located 3' to the first promoter. Amplification of the 5'-end of the AR gene indicates that RNA originating from the second promoter is initiated from 162 and 170 bases downstream from the 5'-most previously characterized site. Northern blot analysis indicated that RNA initiated from the two promoters is differentially expressed in several cell lines and multiple tissues. Androgen ablation by castration showed that both promoters are controlled by androgens in the kidney. Sequence analysis revealed that the second promoter does not contain a TATA or CAAT box. Further characterization of this promoter may provide important insights into the transcriptional regulation of the androgen receptor since previous studies have often included only the first promoter.

Animals↗