Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Sumatriptan”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,747 records · Page 97Linked to original sources

Serotonin receptor physiology: relation to emesis.

Several serotonin (5-HT) receptor subtypes have been defined by pharmacological responses to selective agonists and antagonists and by pathways of receptor-effector coupling. Using molecular techniques, additional receptor subtypes have been described. 5-HT receptors are prevalent in the central nervous system and gut and participate in induction of emesis. 5-HT3 antagonists are used to prevent emesis from cancer chemotherapy and also demonstrate efficacy in radiation-induced nausea, postoperative nausea, hyperemesis gravidarum, and nausea and vomiting with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. 5-HT4 agonists exhibit prokinetic properties in nauseated patients with gastroparesis and functional dyspepsia. Conversely, 5-HT4 antagonists have antiemetic activity in some experimental models. The 5-HT1D receptor agonist sumatriptan reduces emesis with migraine headaches and in cyclic vomiting syndrome, most likely via action on central nervous system sites. In other models, 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A/5-HT2C agonists exhibit antiemetic properties. The utility of 5-HT receptor ligands in treating emesis is the subject of active investigation.

Adolescent↗

The new triptans.

In the past 10 years, new compounds have been developed for the acute treatment of migraine. Studies of a group of compounds called the triptans are summarized. The triptans are derived from the serotonin molecule and act on the 5-hydroxytryptamine 1B/1D receptors. The receptors are on the blood vessels, trigeminal neurons and trigeminal nucleus caudalis. Activation of these receptors causes constriction of extracerebral intracranial vessels, abolition of the dural extravasation and neurogenic inflammation, and inhibition of trigeminal neuronal discharge. The drugs are sumatriptan, zolmitriptan, naratriptan, rizatriptan and eletriptan. Their pharmacology and clinical properties are reviewed and compared.

Humans↗

[Pharmacokinetics of SSRI antidepressants: half-life and clinical applicability].

The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) antidepressants are at present time the most useful for the treatment of depression. SSRIs exhibit differences in potency of inhibiting serotonin reuptake, although the differences do not correlate with clinical efficacy. There are substantial pharmacokinetic differences among the five SSRIs, fluvoxamine, fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline and citalopram. Optimum use of these drugs requires a working knowledge of these differences. Among these pharmacokinetic parameters, half-life and metabolism pathways are the most relevant. There are substantial differences in term of their half-life between fluoxetine and others SSRIs. The half-life of fluoxetine and its active metabolite norfluoxetine is respectively 2 to 4 days and 7 to 15 days, more extended than other SSRIs (approximately 1 day). The extended half-life of fluoxetine and its active metabolite may be an advantage in the poorly compliant patient and may offer a potential safety advantage over shorter-acting SSRIs, with respect to abrupt discontinuation of therapy. Conversely, this long half-life needs a long period of wash-out (5 weeks) before introducing other drugs (MAOIs, sumatriptan) which can interact with serotonin function and can lead to the serotoninergic syndrome. SSRIs are potent inhibitors of the hepatic isoenzyme P450-2D6 and would be expected to have effects on the clearance of drugs metabolized by this enzyme. Paroxetine is the most potent inhibitor, followed by fluoxetine, sertraline, citalopram and fluvoxamine. The metabolite elimination of citalopram, paroxetine and fluvoxamine is delayed by renal disease and dosages should be lowered in elderly patients. Conversely the pharmacokinetic of fluoxetine and sertraline are not affected by either age or renal impairment and, for fluoxetine, by obesity.

Half-Life↗

[New prospects in the treatment of migraine].

The options for migraine treatment have increased in the recent years and will expand in the near future. In this work both recent and future options for migraine treatment are critically reviewed. Firstly the late advances in the symptomatic treatment of migraine, including the new 5-HT1B/D agonists "triptans" appeared after sumatriptan, are reviewed. Possible alternative, such as selective 5-HT1D and 5-HT1F agonists, are also discussed. In the second part of this manuscript the new, possible options for the preventive treatment of migraine comprising "antiepileptics", such as valproic acid, gabapentin and topiramate, calcium-antagonists, such as cyclandelate and dotarizin, and a miscellany, including riboflavin, are analysed. Finally, possible compounds for the future, such as the selective inhibitors of neurokinin receptors or drugs acting upon neuronal calcium channels, are commented. From this review we conclude that while there have been relevant advances in the symptomatic treatment of migraine, there is a need for the development of better preventive compounds.

Anticonvulsants↗

Naratriptan.

The new 5-HT1B/1D agonist naratriptan, introduced in many countries in 1997 and 1998 for the acute treatment of migraine, was designed to complement the sumatriptan portfolio of offerings (including the injection, the tablets, the nasal spray, and in some countries, the suppository) by offering patients excellent tolerability and a sustained duration of action. Clinical studies on naratriptan, including more than 4000 patients treating more than 15,000 migraine attacks, show that naratriptan tablets 2.5 mg are distinguished from other 5-HT1B/1D agonists for migraine on the basis of their excellent tolerability profile, which does not differ from that of placebo. In addition to its tolerability, naratriptan tablets 2.5 mg possess a long duration of action with a low incidence of headache recurrence (17-28% in phase II and III clinical trials). With its tolerability profile and long duration of action, naratriptan tablets 2.5 mg may be particularly appropriate as a single-dose alternative to NSAIDs and analgesics, which often are not effective in migraine but are used because of tolerability considerations.

Adolescent↗

Expression of 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor subtype messenger RNA in interstitial cells from human heart valves.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Severe heart valve disorder has been reported in patients receiving a combination of the anorectic drugs fenfluramine and phentermine. The exact molecular mechanisms involved remain unknown. Fenfluramine alters the serotonin level in the brain, while phentermine interferes with the pulmonary clearance of serotonin; these data suggest that serotonin levels affect regulation of valve function. The aim of the present study was to characterize the serotonin receptor (5-hydroxytryptamine) subtypes expressed in the interstitial cells of human heart valves. METHODS: Interstitial cells were isolated and cultured from the aortic, pulmonary, mitral and tricuspid valves of recipient hearts obtained during transplantation. Total RNA was extracted from cultured cells in order to determine gene expression by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) using 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) subtype-specific primer pairs. RESULTS: The results show that: (i) 5-HT 1B and 1D receptor subtypes are expressed in all four heart valves. This is significant as the 1B and 1D receptor subfamilies are the target of the anti-migraine drug sumatriptan, and these receptors regulate cardiac function and movement; (ii) 5-HT 1A, 5-HT 1E and 5-HT 1F are not expressed in interstitial cells isolated from the valves. CONCLUSION: We conclude that preliminary evidence exists for the presence of distinct subsets of 5-HT receptors in human heart valves, indicating that interstitial cells of the valves potentially respond to serotonin levels.

Appetite Depressants↗

[Neurologic diagnosis and therapy of headaches].

Headaches are a very common complaint for general practitioners and neurologists. When a regional cause has been excluded, the neurologist will class headaches according to the criteria of the International Headache Society. An estimate of the 1-year prevalence of migraine in adults is about 10-15%. First line treatment of migraine attacks consists in aspirin (1 g) with or without metoclopramide or nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Second line treatment consists in vasoconstrictors, ergotamine or triptans. Beta-blockers are used for first line prophylactic treatment of migraine. Tension-type headache is by far the most common form of headache with a prevalence ranging from 30% to 80% and is more prevalent in women than in men. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and muscle relaxants are used for tension-type headache. The prevalence of cluster headache is about 0.1%. Acute treatment consists in inhalation of 100% oxygen at 7 liters/min using a facial mask for 15 minutes or subcutaneous sumatriptan (6 mg), at most twice daily. Chronic paroxysmal hemicrania is a rare type of cluster headache with an absolute effectiveness of indomethacin. Trigeminal neuralgia is rare. However, it is probably the most intense facial pain. Pharmacological treatment is based on carbamazepin. Surgical treatment may be proposed secondarily. In conclusion, the right diagnosis leads to the right treatment. Thus, daily chronic headaches due to drug overuse can be avoided.

Headache↗

Is there an indication for the use of barbiturate-containing analgesic agents in the treatment of pain? Guidelines for their safe use and withdrawal management. Canadian Pharmacists Association.

OBJECTIVE: To provide medical and pharmaceutical practitioners with information on the effectiveness, safety and risks associated with barbiturate-containing analgesic (BCA) agents and an approach to management of withdrawal from BCAs. METHODS: The benefits of using BCAs in the treatment of pain (compared with using non-BCAs) were weighed against potential risks. The procedures for discontinuation of BCAs in patients with pain were considered, and evidence showing that BCAs constitute a public health risk was reviewed. The evidence serving as the basis for the clinical guidelines was compiled from a number of sources, including key papers in the field, published and unpublished papers, and reports by Addiction Research Foundation researchers, a MEDLINE search from 1967 to November 1996, and communication with Canadian manufacturers of BCAs. RESULTS: There is no evidence that there is a clinically important enhancement of analgesic efficacy of BCAs due to the barbiturate constituent. No epidemiological studies on the relative frequency of abuse and dependence, or studies that have analyzed combination product use from a public health and social benefit to risk perspective, have been published to clarify the issues about the nature, extent and seriousness of these problems. RECOMMENDATIONS: No evidence exists to show a clinically important enhancement of analgesic efficacy of BCAs due to the barbiturate constituents. Because BCAs do not have a therapeutic advantage, there is no clinical reason to choose such a combination product when a simpler and often less expensive analgesic formulation (eg, acetaminophen, acetylsalicylic acid, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug or narcotic) or a more specific anti-migraine drug (eg, dihydroergotamine or sumatriptan) is available. BCAs should be avoided in elderly people and should not be used in children. Extrapolation from published reports on abuse and withdrawal syndrome with these drugs suggests that BCAs have the potential to produce drug dependence and addictive behaviour, especially with regular use. In BCA overdose, the barbiturate component is only one of the clinically significant contributors to any morbidity, but its presence can complicate the management of additive or synergistic toxicities. Therefore, there is no reason to choose a combination product when a simpler product may be a safer alternative by minimizing the potential for addiction and the occurrence of additive side effects or toxicities. It is further recommended that prescribers re-evaluate treatment for patients using BCAs. Recommendations for withdrawal are provided, based on estimated consumption.

Analgesics↗

Pharmacology of emesis and gastrointestinal motility: implications for migraine.

This paper outlines the physiopharmacology of emesis and its gastrointestinal motor correlates in relation to the possible treatment strategies of a migraine attack. The gastrointestinal motor correlates of vomiting consist of a stereotyped motor response to diverse stimuli and basically include gastric relaxation and a series of events (intestinal motor inhibition and disruption of slow wave activity) in preparation for the occurrence of a retrograde giant contraction that propagates orally and empties intestinal contents into the stomach. These motor correlates always accompany vomiting, but may also appear as an independent phenomenon. Antidopaminergic agents, such as metoclopramide and domperidone, have antiemetic/prokinetic properties, block the gastrointestinal motor correlates of vomiting and may speed up absorption of antimigraine agents. The use of 5-HT4 receptor agonists may be an alternative strategy to achieve prokinesia during a migraine attack, although this issue still needs to be fully addressed by controlled studies. Sumatriptan was found to induce gastric relaxation and delay gastric emptying, but the impact of these effects during a migraine attack remains to be determined.

Animals↗

A pathophysiological view of primary headaches.

The cerebral circulation is innervated by sympathetic, parasympathetic and sensory nerves which store a considerable number of neurotransmitters. The role of these has been evaluated in primary headaches. A clear association between head pain and the release of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) was demonstrated. In cluster headache and in a case of chronic paroxysmal headache there was in addition release of vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) which was associated with facial symptoms (nasal congestion, rhinorrhea). In parallel with sumatriptan treatment head pain subsided and neuropeptide release normalised. These data show the involvement of sensory and parasympathetic mechanisms in the pathophysiology of primary headaches.

Animals↗

[Cluster headache--clinical aspects, pathophysiology and treatment].

EPIDEMIOLOGY: Cluster headache afflicts somewhat less than one in thousand in the general population. The majority of sufferers are men. CLINICAL FEATURES: The syndrome is characterized by frequent attacks of intense pain localized in and around the eye on one side, characteristically accompanied by conjunctival injection and lacrimation in this eye, along with nasal stuffiness on the same side and sometimes a Horner's syndrome. All symptoms and signs are strictly unilateral and occur during attacks lasting between 15 minutes and three hours. The attacks occur from once to eight times daily during a period lasting from some weeks to months. After a remission of varying duration, the same pattern recurs. PATHOPHYSIOLOGY: Recent findings suggest a pivotal role of the hypothalamus in relation to the pathophysiology. TREATMENT: Sumatriptan injection or oxygen inhalation aborts pain attacks in most patients. The most frequently used prophylactic agents are verapamil, lithium and steroids.

Cluster Headache↗

Donitriptan (Pierre Fabre).

Pierre Fabre is developing donitriptan, a piperazide 5-HT1D agonist, as a potential treatment for migraine [175854]. In January 2001, donitriptan had completed phase I trials for migraine and was scheduled to enter phase II development [396027]. This compound has an increased potency and, importantly, markedly higher intrinsic activity in comparison to the well described tryptamine derivatives, naratriptan, zolmitriptan and sumatriptan [295769].

Animals↗

[Both neurogenic and vascular causes of primary headache].

The cerebral circulation is innervated by sympathetic, parasympathetic and sensory nerves which store a number of neurotransmitters. The significance of these for primary headache has been evaluated. A clear association between head pain and the release of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) was demonstrated. In cluster headache and in chronic paroxysmal hemicrania, there was additionally a release of vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) in association with facial symptoms (nasal congestion, rhinorrhea). Upon treatment with sumatriptan, head pain subsided and neuropeptide release normalized. These data show the involvement of sensory and parasympathetic mechanisms in the pathophysiology of primary headache.

Calcium Channels↗

[Zolmitriptan in treatment of migraine attack--the ARES Study].

In an open-label Swiss multicentre trial to assess patient acceptance, efficacy and safety of zolmitriptan 2.5 mg tablets in the acute treatment of migraine, 112 patients were enrolled and 281 migraine attacks evaluated. Patients completed a specially designed protocol during and after each attack. Special attention was given to the patients' subjective comparison of the study drug with previously used abortive treatments. On this matter, zolmitriptan performed clearly better than analgesics and NSAIDS (78% "better"). Compared with sumatriptan, zolmitriptan was narrowly preferred (45% "better", 36% "worse"). Headache intensity was reduced from moderate or severe to mild or none after one hour in 51% and after 2 hours in 70%. Median time to efficacy was 50 minutes. Autonomic symptoms such as nausea and photo- and phonophobia were improved in 45 to 55%. A subjectively significant improvement in general condition (functionality) was reported in 51% after one hour and in 72% after 2 hours. Headache recurrence was reported by 25% of the responders after a median time lapse of 14 hours. Adverse effects were reported by 22%, and were all short lasting and spontaneously reversible. Rapid efficacy, high and persistent response rate, improvement of headache, autonomic symptoms and general condition, and excellent tolerability are thus the reasons for the patients' preference of zolmitriptan over traditional abortive drugs.

Adult↗

Controversies in dyspepsia.

Even in the absence of visible lesions like an ulcer, cancer or oesophagitis, patients with functional dyspepsia may complain of severe dyspeptic symptoms and have a poor quality of life. Characteristically, these patients also often have a low estimate of their own health and have complaints from several organ systems. The cause of the disease is not known. Both central nervous system and gastric disturbances appear to be involved, and their relative importance is controversial. There is no clear beneficial effect of acid suppression or H. pylori eradication although effects of such therapy may be seen in minor subgroups. New findings emphasise the importance of distinguishing between functional dyspepsia and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, which exhibit completely different gastric accommodation patterns to a meal and have very different therapeutic potential. The effect of drugs like glyceryl trinitrate, glucagon, sumatriptan and buspirone which all concomitantly improve symptoms and gastric accommodation support the important role of abnormal gastric accommodation to meals in patients with functional dyspepsia. A hypothetical model for the pathogenesis of functional dyspepsia is presented. It incorporates four established abnormalities: various psychological abnormalities, low vagal tone, impaired gastric relaxation, and visceral hypersensitivity, in a logical interplay along the brain-gut axis.

Dyspepsia↗

Migraine: diagnosis, management, and new treatment options.

OBJECTIVE: The safety and tolerability of medications used to treat acute migraine attacks are summarized, the classification of headaches and the causes of and diagnostic criteria for migraine are reviewed, and the clinical tolerability profiles and therapeutic benefits of second-generation triptans are presented. BACKGROUND: Migraine is a paroxysmal disorder characterized by attacks of headache, nausea, vomiting, photophobia, and phonophobia. Drugs used to prevent migraine and those that effectively treat acute migraine attacks are readily available. METHODS: Mild or moderate migraines are often treated with aspirin, acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antiemetic drugs, or isometheptene. Triptans (5-HT1 receptor agonists) are used to treat moderate or severe migraine and when nonspecific medications have been ineffective. Because sumatriptan, the first triptan used, is effective but can induce adverse events, second-generation triptans (zolmitriptan, naratriptan, rizatriptan, and almotriptan) were developed to increase the benefit-to-risk ratio in migraine management. RESULTS: Important pharmacologic, pharmacokinetic, and clinical differences exist among those drugs, but the tolerability profile of the newer triptans is very good, and they provide rapid relief from headache and sustained duration of effect. CONCLUSION: Primary care physicians must manage migraine patients with treatments that demonstrate a balance between efficacy and tolerability.

Analgesics↗

Economic comparison of oral triptans for management of acute migraine: implications for managed care.

Sound, informed decision making regarding which drugs to include on a formulary should be based on the best available evidence of their clinical efficacy and incidence of adverse events. Comparative drug costs and clinical effectiveness should also be considered during the formulary development process. Clinical trials traditionally evaluate efficacy and adverse events independently, whereas effectiveness in real-life conditions is defined as some combination of efficacy and side effects. When evaluating similar medications, head-to-head efficacy and effectiveness studies are preferred. For oral triptans (serotonin 5-HT(1B,1D) receptor agonists), there are many placebo-controlled trials and several active trials that compare newer oral triptans with sumatriptan; however, there have been few comparisons of triptans in head-to-head trials. Meta-analysis is an appropriate method to evaluate multiple clinical trials critically and combine the results. A recently published meta-analysis used patient-level data to assess efficacy and adverse events across multiple triptan clinical trials. In this analysis, we combined those results with medication costs to assess the overall value among oral triptans. Using this combined approach, almotriptan was found to have the greatest economic value. It delivers comparable efficacy, placebo-like tolerability, and the highest value when compared with other triptans currently marketed in the United States.

Administration, Oral↗

Gateways to clinical trials.

Gateways to Clinical Trials is a guide to the most recent clinical trials in current literature and congresses, which has been retrieved from the Clinical Studies knowledge area of Prous Science Integrity, the world's first drug discovery and development portal, providing information on study design, treatments, conclusions and references. This issue focuses on the following selection of drugs: Abacavir sulfate; abciximab; abetimus sodium; adalimumab; aldesleukin; almotriptan; alteplase; amisulpride; amitriptyline hydrochloride; amoxicillin trihydrate; atenolol; atorvastatin calcium; atrasentan; Beclometasone dipropionate; bosentan; Captopril; ceftriaxone sodium; cerivastatin sodium; cetirizine hydrochloride; cisplatin; citalopram hydrobromide; Dalteparin sodium; darusentan; desirudin; digoxin; Efalizumab; enoxaparin sodium; ertapenem sodium; esomeprazole magnesium; estradiol; ezetimibe; Famotidine; farglitazar; fluorouracil; fluticasone propionate; fosamprenavir sodium; Glibenclamide; glucosamine sulfate; Heparin sodium; HSPPC-96; hydrochlorothiazide; Imatinib mesilate; implitapide; Lamivudine; lansoprazole; lisinopril; losartan potassium; l-Propionylcarnitine; Melagatran; metformin hydrochloride; methotrexate; methylsulfinylwarfarin; Nateglinide; norethisterone; Olmesartan medoxomil; omalizumab; omapatrilat; omeprazole; oseltamivir phosphate; oxatomide; Pantoprazole; piperacillin sodium; pravastatin sodium; Quetiapine hydrochloride; Rabeprazole sodium; raloxifene hydrochloride; ramosetron hydrochloride; ranolazine; rasburicase; reboxetine mesilate; recombinant somatropin; repaglinide; reteplase; rosiglitazone; rosiglitazone maleate; rosuvastatin calcium; Sertraline; simvastatin; sumatriptan succinate; Tazobactam sodium; tenecteplase; tibolone; tinidazole; tolterodine tartrate; troglitazone; Uniprost; Warfarin sodium; Ximelagatran.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗