Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Motion Perception”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,747 records · Page 97Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

The selective impairment of the perception of first-order motion by unilateral cortical brain damage.

First-order (Fourier) motion consists of stable spatiotemporal luminance variations. Second-order (non-Fourier) motion consists instead of spatiotemporal modulation of contrast, flicker, or spatial frequency. In spite of extensive psychophysical and computational analysis of the nature and relationship of these two types of motion, it remains unclear whether they are detected by the same mechanism or whether separate mechanisms are involved. Here we report the selective impairment of first-order motion, on a range of local and global motion tasks, in the contralateral visual hemifield of a patient with unilateral brain damage centered on putative visual areas V2 and V3 in the medial part of the occipital lobe. His perception of second-order motion was unimpaired. As his disorder is the obverse of that reported after damage in the vicinity of human visual area MT (V5), the results support models of motion processing in which first- and second-order motion are, at least in part, computed separately at the extrastriate cortical level.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Weakened center-surround interactions in visual motion processing in schizophrenia.

Schizophrenia is often accompanied by a range of visual perception deficits, with many involving impairments in motion perception. The presence of perceptual abnormalities may impair neural processes that depend on normal visual analysis, which in turn may affect overall functioning in dynamic visual environments. Here, we examine the integrity of suppressive center-surround mechanisms in motion perception of schizophrenic patients. Center-surround suppression has been implicated in a range of visual functions, including figure-ground segregation and pursuit eye movements, visual functions that are impaired in schizophrenia. In control subjects, evidence of center-surround suppression is found in a reduced ability to perceive motion of a high-contrast stimulus as its size increases. This counterintuitive finding is likely a perceptual correlate of center-surround mechanisms in cortical area MT. We now show that schizophrenic patients exhibit abnormally weak center-surround suppression in motion, an abnormality that is most pronounced in patients with severe negative symptoms. Interestingly, patients with the weakest surround suppression outperformed control subjects in motion discriminations of large high-contrast stimuli. This enhanced motion perception of large high-contrast stimuli is consistent with an MT abnormality in schizophrenia and has a potential to disrupt smooth pursuit eye movements and other visual functions that depend on unimpaired center-surround interactions in motion.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Perceptual organization of moving stimuli modulates the flash-lag effect.

When a visual stimulus is flashed at a given location the moment a second moving stimulus arrives at the same location, observers report the flashed stimulus as spatially lagging behind the moving stimulus (the flash-lag effect). The authors investigated whether the global configuration (perceptual organization) of the moving stimulus influences the magnitude of the flash-lag effect. The results indicate that a flash presented near the leading portion of a moving stimulus lags significantly more than a flash presented near the trailing portion. This result also holds for objects consisting of several elements that group to form a unitary percept of an object in motion. The present study demonstrates a novel interaction between the global configuration of moving objects and the representation of their spatial position and may provide a new and useful tool for the study of perceptual organization.

Fixation, Ocular↗
PubMed1992

Testing otolith function.

Otolithic signals contribute to; (1) perception of orientation and linear motion, (2) generate compensatory eye movements in response to linear acceleration of the head and (3) participate in the co-ordination of movement and balance. Tests of these functions shown to be useful in identifying clinical disorders have been reviewed: (1) Evaluation of orientation to gravity, as estimated by adjustment of the visual vertical, indicates deranged otolith function at a peripheral or central level and the sensitivity of this test can be enhanced by performing estimates during centrifugation on a motorised turntable. Estimation of thresholds of self motion on a parallel swing identifies global reduction or unilateral loss of peripheral function, with central disorders awaiting study. (2) Otolith ocular reflexes to linear head translation can be used to demonstrate overall integrity of peripheral function and reveal central abnormalities. Counter-rolling responses to head roll-tilt and measurements of cyclodeviation of the eyes demonstrate functional asymmetries, with some lateralising value, particularly in central lesions. Global function and asymmetries may also be evaluated by 'head eccentric' rotational testing, which adds a tangential linear acceleration to the angular stimulus. The linear acceleration enhances the canal response by adding an otolith component. (3) Latency and amplitude of surface electro-myography (EMG) responses in the limbs to sudden falls, which can be recorded with the subject suspended on a hinged bed, indicate gross peripheral abnormality of function and can lateralize disorders of CNS motor pathways. It is concluded that some tests of otolith function can be of use in indicating global loss of peripheral otolith function, others are capable of lateralizing a marked loss of function and all have the potential to give information about central disorders. They all have to be interpreted within the clinical context and, unfortunately, none have yet been shown to be sensitive to partial, particularly unilateral, dysfunction.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

The relative efficacy of cues for two-dimensional shape perception.

The visual system uses a variety of cues for form perception, including motion, color, binocular disparity, texture, and luminance. Physiological evidence suggests that these cues are processed by different neural mechanisms. Do the cues processed by some mechanisms convey any advantage for form perception when compared to cues processed by another? In response to this question we assessed the relative efficiency of several cues in conveying two-dimensional form from background noise. For the sake of comparison, every cue type used the same experimental design and stimulus set. Our results confirm that movement is one of the most efficient cues for shape perception. Also, a simple transient cue (an instantaneous flashing on or off) is equally useful. In comparison, local dot density (a type of texture cue) was the least efficient. The efficiencies of most other cues, such as color, stereopsis, and relative movement in noise, were conspicuously similar.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Torsional eye movements are facilitated during perception of self-motion.

Visual motion in the roll plane elicits torsional optokinetic nystagmus (tOKN) with intermittent periods of illusory, contradirectional self-motion (circularvection, CV). The CV may also have a component of whole-body tilt if the axis of stimulus rotation is not aligned with the direction of gravity. We report how the characteristics of tOKN are affected by the presence of CV. Subjects had their eye movements recorded by VOG whilst viewing a full-field stimulus rotating at 30-60 degrees/s about their naso-occipital axis. They were tested in upright and supine posture and signalled the presence-absence of CV with a pushbutton. In both postures, during CV, tOKN slow-phase gain was found to be enhanced and average torsional eye position shifted in the direction opposite to stimulus rotation. When supine, slow-phase gain was greater than when upright both during the perception of object-motion and during CV. The effects may be explained in terms of a relegation of restraining vestibular input to the torsional oculomotor system during CV and illusory tilt.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Detection thresholds for object motion and self-motion during vestibular and visuo-oculomotor stimulation.

We compared the detection threshold for object motion with that of self-motion in space in healthy human subjects. Stimuli consisted of horizontal rotations of subjects' body with a fixation spot kept in fixed alignment with their heads (vestibular stimulus), rotation of the fixation spot relative to the stationary subjects (visuo-oculomotor stimulus), and a combination thereof by applying rotations of subjects body relative to the stationary object (sinusoidal oscillations, 0.025-0.4 Hz). Two series of experiments were performed. 1) One group of subjects was instructed to attend to, and to indicate the occurrence of, either object or self-motion. 2) A second group was instructed not only to detect the occurrence of a perception, but also to quality it either as object motion or self-motion, depending on which modality dominated perceptually. With either instruction it was found that all three stimulus conditions could evoke both, either an object motion perception or a self-motion perception. The detection thresholds of both perceptions were essentially similar. Thresholds were highest with the vestibular stimulus, intermediate with the stimulus combination, and lowest with the visuo-oculomotor stimulus. The vestibular threshold depended on stimulus frequency, in that it decreased with increasing frequency. Thereby, it became similar to the visuo-oculomotor one, which was essentially constant across frequency. Probability of occurrence of the perceptions in the first experimental series was considerably higher than in the second series, suggesting an important role of attentional mechanisms. In the second series, percent frequency of occurrence of veridical perception (object motion with visuo-oculomotor stimulus, self-motion with stimulus combination) was at chance level (50%) at low stimulus frequency, but was augmented considerably at high frequency. We assume that the latter effect is brought about by a visual-vestibular conflict measure by which the visual stimulus (light spot) is qualified as representing either a moving object or a spatial reference for self-motion. While at suprathreshold stimulus intensities the conflict can determine perception magnitude, at threshold levels its influence is restricted mainly on the probability of occurrence of object and self-motion perception.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Chinese and Americans see opposite apparent motions in a Chinese character.

The perceived direction of apparent motion can be influenced by both "top-down" factors, such as expectation, and by "bottom-up" or stimulus-driven factors, such as grouping (Tse, P., Cavanagh, P. & Nakayama, K. (1998). The role of parsing in high-level motion processing. In T. Watanabe, High-level motion processing - computational, neurobiological and psychophysical perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press). Here we report the results of a single experiment that pitted top-down cues against bottom-up cues in an apparent motion sequence over the successive strokes of a Chinese character. Although each stroke was in fact presented all at once, subjects raised in China tended to see apparent motion over a single stroke in the direction it would have taken when drawn by hand, even though bottom-up cues drive a percept of apparent motion in the opposite direction for observers unfamiliar with the Chinese language. There is therefore a learned component to motion perception arising from top-down expectations capable of overriding bottom-up cues to motion.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Posterior parietal cortex neurons encode target motion in world-centered coordinates.

The motion areas of posterior parietal cortex extract information on visual motion for perception as well as for the guidance of movement. It is usually assumed that neurons in posterior parietal cortex represent visual motion relative to the retina. Current models describing action guided by moving objects work successfully based on this assumption. However, here we show that the pursuit-related responses of a distinct group of neurons in area MST of monkeys are at odds with this view. Rather than signaling object image motion on the retina, they represent object motion in world-centered coordinates. This representation may simplify the coordination of object-directed action and ego motion-invariant visual perception.

Action Potentials↗
PubMed2004

Opponent-motion mechanisms are self-normalizing.

In the ultimate stage of the Adelson-Bergen motion energy model [Adelson, E. H., & Bergen, J. (1985). Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 2, 284-299], motion is derived from the difference between directionally opponent energies E(L) and E(R). However, Georgeson and Scott-Samuel [Georgeson, M. A., & Scott-Samuel, N. E. (1999). Motion contrast: A new metric for direction discrimination. Vision Research, 39, 4393-4402] demonstrated that motion contrast-a metric that normalizes opponent motion energy (E(L)-E(R)) by flicker energy (E(L)+E(R))-is a better descriptor of human direction discrimination. In a previous study [Rainville, S. J. M., Makous, W. L., & Scott-Samuel, N. E. (2002). The spatial properties of opponent-motion normalization. Vision Research, 42, 1727-1738], we used a lateral masking paradigm to show that opponent-motion normalization is selective for flicker position, orientation, and spatial-frequency. In the present study, we used a superposition masking paradigm and compared results to lateral masking data, as the two masking types activate local and remote normalization mechanisms differentially. Although selectivity for flicker orientation and spatial frequency varied across observers, bandwidths were similar across lateral and superimposed masking conditions. Additional experiments demonstrated that normalization signals are pooled over a spatial region whose aspect ratio and size are consistent with those of local motion detectors. Together, results show no evidence of remote normalization signals predicted by broadband inhibitory models [(e.g.) Heeger, D. J. (1992). Normalization of cell responses in cat striate cortex. Visual Neuroscience, 9, 181-197; Foley, J. M. (1994). Human luminance pattern-vision mechanisms: Masking experiments require a new model. Journal of the Optical Society of America A-Optics and Image Science, 11, 1710-1719] but support a local normalization process whose spatial properties are inherited from low-level motion detectors.

Flicker Fusion↗
PubMed1992

Infants' sensitivity to effects of gravity on visible object motion.

A preference method probed infants' perception of object motion on an inclined plane. Infants viewed videotaped events in which a ball rolled downward (or upward) while speeding up (or slowing down). Then infants were tested with events in which the ball moved in the opposite direction with appropriate or inappropriate acceleration. Infants aged 7 months, but not 5 months, looked longer at the test event with inappropriate acceleration, suggesting emerging sensitivity to gravity. A further study tested whether infants appreciate that a stationary object released on an incline moves downward rather than upward; findings again were positive at 7 months and negative at 5 months. A final study provided evidence, nevertheless, that 5-month-old infants discriminate downward from upward motion and relate downward motion in videotaped events to downward motion in live events. Sensitivity to certain effects of gravity appears to develop in infancy.

Acceleration↗
PubMed2001

Motion of contrast envelopes: peace and noise.

We examined the effect of changing the composition of the carrier on the perception of motion in a drifting contrast envelope. Human observers were required to discriminate the direction of motion of contrast modulations of an underlying carrier as a function of temporal frequency and scaled (carrier) contrast. The carriers were modulations of both color and luminance, defined within a cardinal color space. Random-noise carriers had either binary luminance profiles or flat (gray-scale-white) or 1/f (pink) spectral power functions. Independent variables investigated were the envelope spatial frequency and temporal-drift frequency and the fundamental spatial frequency, color, and temporal-update frequency of the carrier. The results show that observers were able to discriminate correctly the direction of envelope motion for binary-noise carriers at both high (16 Hz) and low (2 Hz) temporal-drift frequencies. Changing the carrier format from binary noise to a flat (gray-scale) or 1/f amplitude profile reduced discrimination performance slightly but only in the high-temporal-frequency condition. Manipulation of the fundamental frequency of the carrier elicited no change in performance at the low temporal frequencies but produced ambiguous or reversed motion at the higher temporal frequencies as soon as the fundamental frequency was higher than the envelope modulation frequency. We found that envelope motion detection was sensitive to the structure of the carrier.

Color↗