Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Masks”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,747 records · Page 97Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

Preliminary evaluation of a new prototype laryngeal mask in children.

We have assessed a prototype laryngeal mask airway (pLMA) in 50 anaesthetized children for ease of insertion, oropharyngeal leak pressures, gastric insufflation and fibreoptic position. The pLMA has a second smaller mask, which rests against the upper oesophageal sphincter, and a second cuff to increase the seal pressure of the glottic mask. All insertions were graded as easy and an effective airway was achieved in all patients. Oropharyngeal leak pressure was > 40 cm H2O in 49 of 50 patients. Gastric insufflation was not detected by epigastric auscultation. In 46 of 50 patients, the vocal cords were seen via a fibreoptic laryngoscope. One patient regurgitated clear fluid, but aspiration did not occur. On removal, blood staining was detected in three of 50 children. We conclude that the pLMA was easy to insert, facilitated high airway pressure ventilation and may provide some protection against gastric insufflation.

Air Pressure↗
PubMed2000

Mucosal pressure and oropharyngeal leak pressure with the ProSeal versus laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized paralysed patients.

The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) is a new laryngeal mask device with a larger, wedge-shaped cuff and a drainage tube. We tested the hypothesis that directly measured mucosal pressure and oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) are higher for the PLMA compared with the laryngeal mask airway (LMA). We also assess the mechanism of seal, and the reliability of cuff volume, in vivo intracuff pressure and calculated mucosal pressure (in vivo minus in vitro intracuff pressure) to predict directly measured mucosal pressure. Thirty-two anaesthetized, paralysed adult patients were randomly allocated to receive either a size 4 LMA or PLMA. Microchip sensors were attached at locations corresponding to: (a) base of tongue; (b) distal oropharynx; (c) hypopharynx; (d) lateral pharynx; (e) posterior pharynx; and (f) pyriform fossa. In vitro and in vivo intracuff pressures, OLP and directly measured mucosal pressure were documented at zero volume and after each 10 ml up to 40 ml. Directly measured mucosal pressure was similar between devices for a given cuff volume, but was lower for the PLMA for a given OLP. Directly measured mucosal pressure was highest in the distal oropharynx for both devices, but rarely (< 5%) exceeded 35 cm H2O. OLP was higher for the PLMA at all cuff volumes. Directly measured mucosal pressure was usually lower than OLP for both devices, and there was a positive correlation between directly measured mucosal pressure and OLP. Cuff volume, in vivo intracuff pressure and calculated mucosal pressure were poor to moderate predictors of directly measured mucosal pressure for the LMA and PLMA. We conclude that the PLMA forms a better seal than the LMA without an increase in directly measured mucosal pressure.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Depth of insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway.

BACKGROUND: The depth of insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) is unknown. We measured depth of insertion in satisfactorily positioned PLMAs. METHODS: All women received size 4 masks and men size 5 masks. We measured the position of the integral bite block in relation to the upper incisors documented in patients over a 6-month period. Depth of insertion was scored by dividing the integral bite block into quarters. Satisfactory positioning of the ProSeal itself was determined by (i) positive 'suprasternal notch test', (ii) no venting via the drain tube during maximal lung inflation, and (iii) an unobstructed airway. RESULTS: We studied 274 patients (147 women and 127 men). The midway point of the bite block was proximal to the incisors (e.g. within the oropharynx) in 78% of women (95% CI 71-85%) and 92% of men (95% CI 87-97). The standard deviation for the depth distribution in women was 0.8 cm and for men was 1.0 cm. CONCLUSIONS: Usually most of the integral bite block lies within the oropharynx. It was never normal for the entire bite block to stick out of the mouth (4 SD from the mean for both men and women). The position of the integral bite block relative to the upper incisors gives valuable information during assessment of PLMA position.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1984

Lateralization of peripherally and centrally masked words in young and elderly people.

Twenty three-letter, vertical words were presented to the right or left visual fields followed by either a flash, a visual noise, or a pattern mask at various stimulus onset asynchronies. For both young and elderly adults, target identification decreased from the flash to the pattern mask condition, whereas the magnitude of the right visual advantage increased. Although the elderly people identified fewer targets than the young, especially in the pattern mask condition, the magnitude of the right visual field advantage did not vary with age. The results argue against the hypothesis that the cerebral hemispheres deteriorate at different rates with age.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Randomized comparison of oxygen mask treatment vs. nasal continuous positive airway pressure in dengue shock syndrome with acute respiratory failure.

Dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF) is caused by dengue virus. Patients with DHF grade 3-4, termed Dengue Shock Syndrome (DSS), may develop acute respiratory failure after initial fluid resuscitation. Previously, these patients were treated with oxygen on a nasal cannula, or if necessary with tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. In the present prospective randomized study, we compared the effectiveness of oxygen treatment administered by a face mask vs. nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP). Morbidity, mortality, and supportive treatment was evaluated. Thirty-seven patients with DSS complicated by respiratory failure were enrolled. On admission and after 30 min of treatment, clinical and paraclinical data were obtained. Chest X-ray revealed pleural effusion in 92 per cent and showed interstitial oedema in 33 per cent. After 30 min of treatment the respiratory rate decreased significantly in the NCPAP group (p < 0.05), while SaO2 and PaO2 increased in both groups (p < 0.01). However, subsequently a significant difference of unresponsiveness to treatment between the oxygen mask group and the NCPAP group (13/19 vs. 4/18,p < 0.01) was noted. Complications of NCPAP or oxygen mask treatment were not documented. We conclude that NCPAP is useful in improving the management of acute respiratory failure in children with DHF/DSS in dengue-endemic areas.

Child↗
PubMed1997

Comparison of end-tidal and arterial carbon dioxide in infants using laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube.

The laryngeal mask airway (LMA) has become a popular tool for airway management in selected adult and pediatric patients undergoing routine surgical procedures. The relationship between end-tidal and arterial carbon dioxide during controlled ventilation via the LMA in infants under 10 kg has not been reported. After induction of general anesthesia, the LMA was placed in 12 healthy infants and mechanical ventilation initiated. After maintaining steady-state level of end-tidal carbon dioxide (minimum 5 min), an arterial blood sample was obtained and end-tidal carbon dioxide level noted. The laryngeal mask was then removed, the trachea intubated, and mechanical ventilation resumed with initial ventilatory variables. After reaching a steady-state level of end-tidal carbon dioxide, a second arterial sample was obtained and end-tidal carbon dioxide level noted. The mean end-tidal carbon dioxide and arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide obtained during ventilation were 42.2 +/- 7.9 and 47.1 +/- 11.0 (LMA) and 37.4 +/- 4.6 and 42.6 +/- 6.7 (endotracheal tube), respectively. Analysis of differences between partial pressure of carbon dioxide and end-tidal carbon dioxide using the Bland and Altman method revealed bias+/-precision of 4.9 +/- 3.9 and 5.3 +/- 3.2 with ventilation via the laryngeal mask and endotracheal tube. Our data indicate that, while ventilating infants under 10 kg with LMA, end-tidal carbon dioxide is an accurate indicator of arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide.

Anesthesia, General↗
PubMed1997

Respiratory mechanics, gastric insufflation pressure, and air leakage of the laryngeal mask airway.

A potential risk of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) is incomplete mask seal, which causes air leakage or insufflation of air into the stomach. The objective of the present study was to assess respiratory mechanics, quantify air leakage, and measure gastric air insufflation in patients ventilated via the LMA. Thirty patients were studied after induction of anesthesia but prior to any surgical manipulations. After the insertion of the LMA, patients were ventilated with increasing tidal volumes until one of the three following end points were reached: 1) gastric air insufflation, 2) airway pressure > 40 cm H2O, or 3) limitation of further increase in tidal volume by air leakage. The following variables were determined:inspired volume (VI), expired volume (VE), maximum inspiratory pressure (Pmax), airway pressure at gastric inflation (Pinfl), respiratory time constant (RC), compliance (C), resistance (R), and leakage fraction (FL). Respiratory mechanics were in the physiological range. Gastric insufflation occurred in 27% of the patients at inspiratory pressures between 19 and 33 cm H2O. Air leakage of more than 10% was evident at inspiratory pressures between 25 and 34 cm H2O. The end point of 40 cm H2O airway pressure was reached in only three patients. We conclude that the LMA is not better in preventing airway pressure transmission to the esophagus than a conventional face mask. However, a high FL is associated with reduced gastric air insufflation.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Use of the laryngeal mask airway in children with upper respiratory tract infections: a comparison with endotracheal intubation.

UNLABELLED: Several studies suggest that placement of an endotracheal tube (ETT) in a child with an upper respiratory infection (URI) increases the risk of complications. However, the development of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) has provided anesthesiologists with an alternative means of airway management. This study was therefore designed to evaluate the use of the LMA in children with URIs and to compare it with the ETT. The study sample consisted of 82 pediatric patients (3 mo to 16 yr of age) who presented for elective surgery with an URI. Patients with URIs were randomly allocated to receive either an ETT (n = 41) or a LMA (n = 41) and were followed for the appearance and severity of any perioperative complications. The two groups were similar with respect to age, gender, anesthesia and surgery times, number of attempts at tube placement, and presenting URI symptoms. There were no differences between groups in the incidence of cough, breath-holding, excessive secretions, or arrhythmias. Although one patient in the ETT group required a muscle relaxant for laryngospasm, the overall incidence of laryngospasm was similar between the two groups. There was, however, a significantly greater incidence of mild bronchospasm in the ETT group compared with the LMA group (12.2% vs 0%, P < 0.05). The incidence of major arterial oxygen desaturation events (SpO2 <90%) during placement of the airway device was also significantly increased in the ETT group (12.5% vs 0%, P < 0.05). Furthermore, the total number of all episodes of respiratory complications, i.e., breath-holding, laryngospasm, bronchospasm, and major oxygen desaturation, was significantly greater in the ETT group (35 vs 19, P < 0.05). Despite this, all respiratory complications were easily managed, and there were no adverse sequelae. Although the risks associated with anesthetizing a child with an URI remain controversial, results from this study suggest that the LMA offers a suitable alternative to the ETT for use in children with URIs. IMPLICATIONS: This study compares the use of the laryngeal mask airway with the endotracheal tube for airway management in children with upper respiratory infections. Results suggest that if the decision is made to proceed with anesthesia for the child with an upper respiratory infection, then the laryngeal mask airway provides a suitable alternative to the endotracheal tube.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Bronchial mucus transport velocity in paralyzed anesthetized patients: a comparison of the laryngeal mask airway and cuffed tracheal tube.

UNLABELLED: We compared bronchial mucus transport velocity (BTV), an index of mucociliary clearance, between the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and the tracheal tube (TT). Forty patients were studied during propofol anesthesia and muscle relaxation with rocuronium. BTV was measured 10 and 60 min after insertion of the airway device by fiberoptic observation of the movement of methylene blue dye injected onto the dorsal surface of the left main bronchus. BTV for the LMA was similar at 10 and 60 min (13.9 +/- 2.0 and 13.6 +/- 2.1 mm/min, respectively). BTV for the TT was significantly faster at 10 min that at 60 min (13.0 +/- 1.4 vs 6.9 +/- 1.2 mm/min, respectively; P < 0.00001). BTV was similar for both devices at 10 min (TT 13.0 +/- 1.4 mm/min versus LMA 13.9 +/- 2.0 mm/min), but was significantly faster for the LMA than for the TT at 60 min (LMA 13.6 +/- 2.1 mm/min versus TT 6.9 +/- 1.2 mm/min; P < 0.00001). We conclude that the LMA impedes mucociliary clearance less than the TT in anesthetized patients. This may have implications for reducing the risk of retention of secretions, atelectasis, and pulmonary infection. IMPLICATIONS: This study compares bronchial mucus transport velocity, an index of mucociliary clearance, in anesthetized patients between two airway devices, the cuffed tracheal tube and the laryngeal mask airway. We have shown that the laryngeal mask airway impairs mucociliary clearance less than the tracheal tube. This may have implications for reducing the risk of retention of secretions, atelectasis, and pulmonary infection.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

A comparison of the laryngeal mask airway and cuffed oropharyngeal airway in anesthetized adult patients.

UNLABELLED: We compared the cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA) with the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in 120 anesthetized adult patients. We compared 1) placement success rates, 2) airway interventional requirements, 3) airway stability in different head/neck positions, 4) cardiorespiratory tolerance, and 5) intra- and postoperative adverse events/symptoms. A standardized anesthesia protocol was followed by four anesthesiologists experienced with both devices. Observational data were validated by independent analysis of continuous video recordings. Postoperative interviews were double-blind to the device used. The LMA had a more frequent success rate than COPA (97% vs 55%, P < 0.00001), an overall higher success rate (100% vs 83%; P = 0.001), a shorter time to achieve an effective airway (49 vs 188 s; P < 0.00001), a higher oropharyngeal leak pressure (21 vs 16 cm H2O; P = 0.003), and a fewer number of chin lift airway interventions required (0.1% vs 42%; P < 0.00001). When comparing mean tidal volumes in different head/neck positions to assess airway stability, the quality of airway was unchanged in 98% patients with the LMA and 54% with the COPA (P < 0.00001). The incidences of intraoperative adverse events were similar. On removal, blood was detected more often on the COPA (3% vs 14%; P = 0.04). In the late postoperative period, more patients complained of adverse symptoms with the COPA than with the LMA (26% vs 57%; P = 0.001). Late postoperative symptoms occurred more frequently with the COPA (0.87 vs 0.34; P = 0.003). There was more late postoperative sore throat (14% vs 36%; P = 0.0003) and more jaw/neck pain (12% vs 26%; P = 0.0008) in patients managed with the COPA. This study demonstrates that the LMA offers advantages over the COPA in most technical aspects of airway management and in terms of postoperative morbidity. IMPLICATIONS: In this randomized, prospective study, we compared the laryngeal mask airway and the cuffed oropharyngeal airway in anesthetized patients. The laryngeal mask airway offers advantages in most technical aspects of airway management and in terms of postoperative morbidity.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

A comparison of the disposable versus the reusable laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed adult patients.

UNLABELLED: A disposable (polyvinyl chloride) laryngeal mask airway (LMA) with dimensions identical to, but physical properties different from (stiffer tube/thicker cuff), the reusable (silicone) LMA has recently become available. We performed a randomized, cross-over study of 60 paralyzed, anesthetized patients to test the hypothesis that the use of these devices was different in terms of ease of insertion, airway sealing pressure, fiberoptic position, and changes in intracuff pressure during N2O anesthesia. We also tested the hypothesis that the airway sealing pressure of the LMA is suboptimal if the cuff is inflated to a high intracuff pressure. Both the devices were inserted into each patient in random order, and their performance was assessed at two intracuff pressures (60 and 180 cm H2O) by a blind observer. Subsequently, intracuff pressures were measured during N2O anesthesia for the second device. Ease of insertion was similar: there was no difference in first attempt success rates (97% vs 98%) and insertion times (15 vs 13 s) for the disposable and reusable LMA, respectively. There were no differences in airway sealing pressure or fiberoptic position. Airway sealing pressure was significantly higher at 60 cm H2O intracuff pressure compared with the airway sealing pressure at 180 cm H2O for both devices (P < 0.02). During N2O anesthesia, the intracuff pressure remained stable for the disposable LMA but increased significantly for the reusable LMA. We conclude that the disposable and reusable LMAs perform similarly in paralyzed adult patients, but that the disposable LMA has more stable intracuff pressures during N2O anesthesia. Inflation of the LMA to high intracuff pressures produces a suboptimal seal. IMPLICATIONS: This randomized, single-blind, within-patient study of 60 adult patients shows that the disposable (polyvinyl chloride) and reusable (silicone) laryngeal mask airways perform similarly, but that the disposable laryngeal mask airway has more stable intracuff pressures during N2O anesthesia. Inflation of either device to high intracuff pressures produces a suboptimal seal.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Anesthesia for intranasal surgery: a comparison between tracheal intubation and the flexible reinforced laryngeal mask airway.

UNLABELLED: The purpose of the study was to assess the suitability and safety of the flexible reinforced laryngeal mask airway (FRLMA) for intranasal surgery (INS) anesthesia. A secondary objective was to compare the incidence of complications of removal of the FRLMA with tracheal extubation in awake and anesthetized patients. One hundred fourteen ASA physical status I and II patients requiring INS were randomly assigned into three groups: Group I = FRLMA, Group II = endotracheal tube (ET) extubated awake, and Group II = ET extubated deeply anesthetized. In Group I, the incidence of coughing and oxyhemoglobin desaturation at removal was significantly reduced compared with that in Groups II and III (P < 0.05). There were no episodes of postremoval laryngospasm in Group I; in Group III, the incidence was 19% (P < 0.05), whereas in Group II, it was 6% (not significantly different). The number of patients with oxyhemoglobin desaturation < or = 92% on admission to the postanesthesia care unit was 0% in Group I, 26% in Group II (P < 0.05), and 16% in Group III (not significantly different). At bronchoscopy, the incidence of blood visible in the airway was low and similar among the three groups (3%, 6%, and 3%, respectively). There were no significant differences in the incidence of airway complications between Groups II and III. IMPLICATIONS: We compared airway management for intranasal surgery anesthesia using a new device, the flexible reinforced laryngeal mask airway, with the current standard of tracheal intubation. The study demonstrates that the flexible reinforced laryngeal mask airway can provide a safe, protected airway with a smoother emergence from anesthesia than tracheal intubation.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Do laryngeal mask airway devices attenuate liquid flow between the esophagus and pharynx? A randomized, controlled cadaver study.

UNLABELLED: In this randomized, controlled cadaver study, we tested the hypothesis that the standard laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and flexible laryngeal mask airway (FLMA) attenuate liquid flow between the esophagus and pharynx. Fifty fresh cadavers were studied in four LMA groups. Ten female cadavers had a size 4 LMA and 10 had a size 4 FLMA; 10 male cadavers had a size 5 LMA and 10 had a size 5 FLMA; 5 male and 5 female cadavers functioned as controls. The chest was opened, and the infusion set of a pressure-controlled, continuous flow pump was inserted into the esophagus and ligated into place. Esophageal pressure was increased in 2-cm H2O increments. Regurgitation pressure was the esophageal pressure at which fluid was first seen with a fiberoptic scope in the hypopharynx (control group) and above the cuff or within the bowl (LMA groups). This was performed in the LMA groups at 0-40 mL cuff volume in 10-mL increments. Mean (95% confidence interval) regurgitation pressure for the control group was 7 (6-8) cm H2O and for the LMA groups combined was 19 (17-20) cm H2O at 0 mL cuff volume, 47 (41-52) cm H2O at 10 mL, 51 (44-55) cm H2O at 20 mL, 52 (45-56) cm H2O at 30 mL, and 52 (45-55) cm H2O at 40 mL. The increase in regurgitation pressure with increasing cuff volume from 0 to 10 mL was statistically significant (P < 0.0001). Regurgitation pressure was higher for the LMA groups at all cuff volumes compared with the control group (P < 0.0001). There were no differences in regurgitation pressure among the LMA groups. We conclude that the correctly placed LMA and FLMA attenuate liquid flow between the esophagus and pharynx. IMPLICATIONS: We have shown, in cadavers, that the correctly placed standard and flexible laryngeal mask airways attenuate liquid flow between the pharynx and esophagus.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Comparison of sevoflurane with propofol for laryngeal mask airway insertion in adults.

UNLABELLED: We performed a prospective, randomized, controlled trial to compare the quality and ease of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion after either rapid inhaled sevoflurane or i.v. propofol induction of anesthesia. Seventy-six unpremedicated ASA physical status I or II patients were anesthetized with either a single vital capacity breath of sevoflurane 8% or i.v. propofol 3 mg/kg, which produced equally rapid loss of consciousness (40.5 +/- 13.9 vs 37.7 +/- 9.9 s; P > 0.05). The LMA was inserted more rapidly in patients in the propofol group (74 +/- 29 vs 127 +/- 35 s; P < 0.01) and required fewer attempts (1.2 vs 1.6; P < 0.05) than the sevoflurane group. There was a greater incidence of initially impossible mouth opening in the sevoflurane group (45% vs 21%; P < 0.05). Once mouth opening was possible, the degree of attenuation of laryngeal reflexes was similar. The overall incidence of complications related to LMA insertion, especially apnea (32% vs 0%; P < 0.01), was more frequent in the propofol group (82% vs 26%; P < 0.01). There were four failures of LMA insertion in the propofol group and none in the sevoflurane group. Both groups had stable hemodynamic profiles and good patient satisfaction. We conclude that sevoflurane vital capacity breath induction compares favorably with i.v. propofol induction for LMA insertion in adults. However, prolonged jaw tightness after the sevoflurane induction of anesthesia may delay LMA insertion. IMPLICATIONS: In this randomized, controlled trial, we compared the ease of insertion of the laryngeal mask airway in adults after induction of anesthesia with either a sevoflurane vital capacity breath technique or propofol i.v.. We conclude that sevoflurane compares favorably with propofol, although prolonged jaw tightness may delay laryngeal mask airway insertion.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

The influence of the tonsillar gag on efficacy of seal, anatomic position, airway patency, and airway protection with the flexible laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, cross-over study of fresh adult cadavers.

UNLABELLED: We conducted a randomized, controlled, cross-over cadaver study to test the hypothesis that the efficacy of seal for ventilation and airway protection, anatomic position, and airway patency with the flexible laryngeal mask airway (FLMA) are altered by the application of a Boyle Davis (B-D) gag. We also determined the airway sealing pressure (ASP) at which the FLMA prevents aspiration when large volumes of fluid are placed above the cuff. We studied 20 adult cadavers (6-24 h postmortem). Efficacy of seal for ventilation and airway protection, anatomic position, and airway patency were determined with and without a B-D gag (two blade sizes: 8 and 10 cm) for the size 3, 4, and 5 FLMA in random order. Efficacy of seal for ventilation was determined by measuring the ASP at an intracuff pressure of 60 cm H2O. Efficacy of seal for airway protection was determined by flooding the mouth with 55-135 mL of water, reducing intracuff pressure until aspiration was detected fiberoptically and measuring ASP at this intracuff pressure. Anatomic position and airway patency were determined with a fiberoptic scope at an intracuff pressure of 60 cm H2O. In addition, in vivo compliance and ASP for the FLMA were measured in 10 cadavers and 10 paralyzed, anesthetized patients. Efficacy of seal for ventilation and airway protection, anatomic position, and airway patency did not change with the application of a gag for any mask size. The mean (range) ASP at which aspiration occurred when large volumes of fluid were placed above the cuff was 11 (7-15) cm H2O. The ASP for ventilation was always higher than the ASP for airway protection (P<0.0001). The FLMA had similar in vivo compliance and ASP in cadavers and anesthetized patients. We conclude that efficacy of seal for ventilation and airway protection, anatomic position and airway patency for the FLMA are unaffected by the application of a B-D gag in adults. ASP should be >15 cm H2O if there is a maximal risk of aspiration from above the cuff. IMPLICATIONS: The flexible laryngeal mask airway forms an effective seal for ventilation and protection of the airway that is unaffected by the application of a mouth gag that provides surgical access to the oropharynx. The efficacy of the seal should be >15 cm H2O if there is a maximal risk of aspiration from above the cuff.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Does the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway prevent aspiration of regurgitated fluid?

In this randomized, cross-over cadaver study, we determined whether a new airway device, the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA; Laryngeal Mask Company, Henley-on-Thames, UK), prevents aspiration of regurgitated fluid. We studied five male and five female cadavers (6-24 h postmortem). The infusion set of a pressure-controlled, continuous flow pump was inserted into the upper esophagus and ligated into place. Esophageal pressure (EP) was increased in 2-cm H(2)O increments. This was performed without an airway device (control) and over a range of cuff volumes (0-40 mL) for the classic laryngeal mask airway (LMA), the PLMA with the drainage tube clamped (PLMA clamped) and unclamped (PLMA unclamped). The EP at which fluid was first seen with a fiberoptic scope in the hypopharynx (control), above or below the cuff, or in the drainage tube, was noted. Mean EP at which fluid was seen without any airway device was 9 (range 8-10) cm H(2)O. EP at which fluid was seen was always higher for the PLMA clamped and LMA compared with the control (all, P<0.0001). The mean EP at which fluid was seen for the PLMA unclamped was similar to the control at 10 (range 8-13) cm H(2)O. For the PLMA unclamped, fluid appeared from the drainage tube in all cadavers at 10-40 mL cuff volume and in 8 of 10 cadavers at zero cuff volume. Mean EP at which fluid was seen above the cuff was similar for the PLMA clamped and LMA at 0-30 mL cuff volume, but was higher for PLMA clamped at 40-mL cuff volume (81 vs 48 cm H(2)O, P = 0.006). Mean EP at which fluid was seen below the cuff was similar at 0-10 mL cuff volume, but was higher for the PLMA clamped at 20, 30, and 40 mL cuff volume (62, 68, 73 vs. 46, 46, 46 cm H(2)O, respectively, P<0.04). For the PLMA clamped and the LMA, fluid appeared simultaneously above and below the cuff at all cuff volumes. We concluded that in the cadaver model, the correctly placed PLMA allows fluid in the esophagus to bypass the pharynx and mouth when the drainage tube is open. Both the LMA, and PLMA with a closed drainage tube, attenuate liquid flow between the esophagus and pharynx. This may have implications for airway protection in unconscious patients.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Resting esophageal sphincter pressures and deglutition frequency in awake subjects after oropharyngeal topical anesthesia and laryngeal mask device insertion.

UNLABELLED: We investigated the effects of oropharyngeal topical anesthesia and placement of the standard (LMA) and the ProSeal (PLMA) laryngeal mask airway on resting gastroesophageal barrier pressure (GEBP), upper esophageal sphincter pressure (UESP), and deglutition frequency in awake subjects. Each subject was studied on 2 consecutive days: 1 day with the LMA and the other with the PLMA, in random order. GEBP and UESP were measured between deglutitions by using a pull-through technique in five sequential conditions: 1) after acclimatization to the manometer, 2) after topical anesthesia, 3) after the LMA or PLMA was self-inserted and the cuff inflated with either 10 or 30 mL of air in random order, 4) after the cuff volume was adjusted to the other randomized volume, and 5) after LMA or PLMA removal. Deglutition frequency was determined between pressure measurements by using a neck microphone. UESP was always larger than GEBP (P < 0.001 for all). Topical anesthesia had no influence on GEBP, UESP, or deglutition frequency. LMA and PLMA placement did not influence GEBP or UESP, but deglutition frequency was higher (P < 0.02 for all). GEBP and UESP did not vary between devices for any condition. Cuff volume did not influence GEBP or UESP. Deglutition frequency was more frequent for the LMA than the PLMA at a 30-mL cuff volume (P = 0.008). We conclude that resting GEBP and UESP are unaffected by oropharyngeal topical anesthesia and the LMA or PLMA in awake subjects, but that deglutition frequency is increased by the LMA or PLMA. This may have implications for the incidence of regurgitation in these situations. IMPLICATIONS: Resting gastroesophageal barrier pressure and upper esophageal sphincter pressure are unaffected by oropharyngeal topical anesthesia and laryngeal mask devices in awake subjects, but deglutition frequency is increased by laryngeal mask devices. This may have implications for the incidence of regurgitation in these situations.

Administration, Topical↗