Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Promotion”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,729 records · Page 96Linked to original sources
PubMed1986

Nucleotide sequences that define promoters that are used by Bacillus subtilis sigma-29 RNA polymerase.

There are at least five different forms of RNA polymerase holoenzyme in Bacillus subtilis. These enzymes differ in their sigma subunit and their specificity for promoter utilization. One form of RNA polymerase (E sigma 29) that contains a 29,000 Mr sigma appears in B. subtilis about two hours after the initiation of endospore formation. The determination of the nucleotide sequences that govern utilization of promoters by E sigma 29 has been limited by the small number of cloned promoters that are recognized by E sigma 29. We have determined the nucleotide sequence of a recently isolated promoter (G4) that is used exclusively by E sigma 29 both in vitro and in vivo. The start-point of transcription was identified by S1 nuclease mapping and dinucleotide priming experiments and the probable promoter element was sequenced. We compared the sequence with that of six promoters that are used to varying degrees in vitro by E sigma 29 and found these sequences to be highly conserved at the -10 and near the -35 regions of these promoters. Single base substitutions were generated at positions -12, -15 and -36 of the G4 promoter and assayed for their influence on utilization by E sigma 29 in in-vitro competition experiments. The effects of these mutations in G4 on its use by E sigma 29 support a model in which E sigma 29 utilizes its cognate promoters by interacting with unique nucleotide sequences at the -10 region and near the -35 region of these promoters.

Bacillus subtilis↗
PubMed1988

RNA polymerases stall and/or prematurely terminate nearby both early and late promoters on polyomavirus DNA.

Levels of transcription within the E and L strands of the five major PstI fragments of polyomavirus (strain AT3) were measured by pulse-labeling RNA both in infected cells and in isolated nuclei or viral transcription complexes during the late phase of infection. Quantification was assured by hybridization to single-stranded DNAs in solution followed by collection of hybrids on nitrocellulose filters and ribonuclease treatment. The level of in vivo transcription in the region of the early (E strand) promoter was two- to threefold higher than that in all other E-strand regions, suggesting that most RNA polymerases prematurely terminate transcription shortly downstream from this promoter during the late phase. In vitro transcription levels in this region were five- to tenfold higher than in the remainder of the E strand, suggesting that many RNA polymerases 'stall' shortly after initiation in vivo but can be reactivated and continue transcription in vitro upon exposure to detergents and high salt solution. Some premature termination nearby the late (L strand) promoter was also detected by the same method. Strikingly, many RNA polymerases also stalled on the L strand in the region of the early promoter, some 5 x 10(3) bases downstream from the late promoter. Treatment of cells with dichlororibofuranosylbenzimidazole did not affect polymerases that stalled or terminated prematurely, but strongly reduced the presence of polymerases that normally transcribed throughout the entire E or L strand. Examination of the size of RNA chains produced during in vitro incubations showed that many polymerases stalled in vivo within 50 to 100 nucleotides downstream from the initiation sites on both DNA strands. The number of polymerases active in vitro at the E strand promoter was similar to the number of polymerases at the L strand promoter. However, in contrast to L-strand transcription, most of the polymerases that initiated at the E-strand promoter were incapable of extended transcription in vivo. These results suggest that large T antigen-mediated repression of E-strand transcription is not simply due to the exclusion of RNA polymerases from the early promoter. Stalling and/or premature termination by RNA polymerases shortly downstream from the early promoter appears to be a mechanism by which temporal regulation of polyomavirus gene expression can be effected.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1989

Activation of the lac promoter and its variants. Synergistic effects of catabolite activator protein and supercoiling in vitro.

Escherichia coli lac promoter variants are shown to be subject to large synergistic transcriptional activation by catabolite activator protein (CRP) and DNA supercoiling in vitro. Activation was studied for the lac wild-type promoter, a promoter with a variant spacing (lac delta l) and two promoters with variant -10 regions (lac ps, lac UV5). The variant promoters respond to the simultaneous presence of CRP and supercoiling by exhibiting large multiplicative activation at the low to moderate superhelicities that are most pertinent in vivo. Although all four promoters can be activated by CRP, those made stronger by changing downstream promoter elements are less CRP-activated even though each contains an identical CRP binding site. When each of the variant promoters is made stronger by introducing DNA supercoils, the apparent CRP activation initially remains constant but eventually declines at higher superhelicities. Thus, strengthening the lac promoter through either DNA sequence changes or the introduction of high-level DNA supercoiling can lead to diminished potential for activation by CRP. These results are interpreted in terms of a role for CRP in providing extra stabilizing contacts for RNA polymerase binding that are necessary only when other stabilizing features of promoter structure are lacking.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed1989

Negative regulation of the hepatitis B virus pre-S1 promoter by internal DNA sequences.

Expression of the surface antigen gene (S gene) of hepatitis B virus is directed by two distinct promoter elements with markedly different activities. The upstream (pre-S1) promoter produces a 2.4-kb transcript at very low levels while the downstream (pre-S2) promoter produces an approximately 2.1-kb transcript in relative abundance. We have constructed a series of internal deletion mutants to analyze differential regulation of the two S gene promoters. We show here that expression directed by the pre-S1 promoter is negatively regulated by DNA sequences containing the downstream pre-S2 promoter region. Nuclear run-on analysis indicates this down-regulation to be at the level of transcription. Furthermore, promoter repression does not appear to be due to products of the S gene region. Deletion mutagenesis studies have permitted the localization of a 61-bp region that may be involved in the apparent down-regulation of the pre-S1 promoter. These results suggest the use of an unusual regulatory mechanism by a dipromoter gene in which an active internal promoter may preclude efficient use of an upstream promoter.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1994

Identification of multiple promoters within the N-ras proto-oncogene.

N-ras possesses a 'housekeeping' promoter, being G + C-rich and devoid of a TATA-box. Transcription initiates at a number of locations within this gene, a phenomena that is generally attributed to the absence of a TATA-box. In this report we investigate the possibility that multiple promoters, which could potentially contribute to the observed 5' end heterogeneity, exist within the murine N-ras gene. The 5' region of the gene was subdivided into several fragments, each corresponding to a region in which one or more transcription initiation site(s) had been mapped, and the ability of each fragment to express a reporter gene was assessed. Promoter activity was found associated with three independent, non-overlapping fragments, two of which were located entirely within transcribed regions of the gene. We found that these intragenic promoters were able to express the N-ras gene itself, as well as the reporter gene. In addition, we found that the activity of an intragenic promoter fragment was dependent upon the presence of regions encompassing initiation sites, and that a small fragment (approximately 40 bp) encompassing several initiation sites possessed promoter activity. These data support the existence of an 'initiator' element within the N-ras gene. Overall, our results demonstrate that multiple promoters reside within N-ras and suggest that they may play a role in generating the observed mRNA 5' end heterogeneity. The identification of multiple promoters within N-ras may have important implications regarding the regulation of expression of this gene in normal and malignant tissues. In addition, since a number of other genes with housekeeping promoters also initiate transcription at multiple locations, it is possible that the utilization of multiple promoters may represent a common feature of this class of genes.

Animals↗
PubMed1993

Glial cell-specific expression of the serotonin 2 receptor gene: selective reactivation of a repressed promoter.

The 5' flanking region of the 5-HT2 receptor gene has been cloned, sequenced and its transcriptional regulatory functions analyzed. The promoter lacks an identifiable TATA motif, and utilizes at least 11 clustered start sites. Promoter function was analyzed by transient assays in rat C6 glioma cells, which were shown to express the endogenous 5-HT2 receptor gene, as well as in rat CREF and human HeLa cells which do not express the endogenous gene. The basal promoter functioned equally well in all three cell lines; and a repression domain, located upstream of the basal promoter, inhibited activity of the promoter in all three cell lines. A far upstream cell specific activator domain restored promoter activity in C6 glioma cells, but did not reactivate the silenced promoter in CREF or HeLa cells. The upstream activator domain, repressor domain and basal promoter functioned in concert to achieve cell type specific expression. The activator domain did not direct C6 glioma cell specific expression in the absence of the repressor domain or in constructs carrying a heterologous basal promoter. These results indicate that glial cell expression of the 5-HT2 receptor gene is achieved through a cell type specific reactivation of a repressed promoter.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1994

Mouse NGF promoter upstream sequences do not affect gene expression in mouse fibroblasts.

The expression of nerve growth factor (NGF) is tightly controlled in a tissue-specific manner during development and in response to injury. In fibroblasts and in other cell types, expression of NGF is regulated at the transcriptional level. In order to elucidate the mechanism of this regulation, we have undertaken the analysis of the mouse NGF promoter in a mouse fibroblast cell line (LTA), using transient transfection of NGF promoter-human growth hormone (hGH) reporter gene plasmids. We find that sequences between +8bp and +120bp, containing an AP-1 site, confer increased levels of expression from the full length and truncated NGF promoters. When this region is deleted, a significant decrease in expression is observed from both the full length promoter and truncated versions thereof. A gradual increase in expression is observed with successive 5' deletions of both the AP-1 containing and AP-1 deleted promoters; this effect results from the juxtapositioning of adjacent plasmid sequences closer to the transcription initiation site and not from deletion of promoter sequences as was previously reported. When the NGF promoter is analyzed using a luciferase reporter plasmid, these 5' promoter deletions have no significant effect on reporter gene expression in fibroblasts. Thus, sequences downstream of the transcription start site influence NGF promoter activity in fibroblasts, but sequences upstream of the TATA box fail to affect promoter activity in these cells.

Animals↗
PubMed1994

Activation of the human IGFBP-1 gene promoter by progestin and relaxin in primary culture of human endometrial stromal cells.

We have studied the activity for the insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1) gene promoter in human endometrial stromal cells by transient transfection. The promoter activity derived from p3.6CAT or p3.6Luc (3400 bp IGFBP-1 promoter 5' to the reporter gene chloramphenicol acetyltransferase or luciferase) was minimal in unstimulated cells. A time study over 13 days of culture showed that the promoter activity increased exponentially to > 10(4) fold in cells treated with medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) and relaxin (RLX). Induction of the IGFBP-1 gene promoter activity by hormones was similar to the secretion pattern of IGFBP-1 in endometrial stromal cells. MPA alone caused a moderate induction, 3-40-fold increase over the control. Deletion analysis showed that two regions in the IGFBP-1 gene promoter were responsible for the activation of the IGFBP-1 gene. The basal promoter region, termed bp1-A (+68 bp to -1.205 kb), contains multiple sections of regulatory sequence including a cis-element CCAAT (-72 bp). A DNase I protection assay in the bp-1A region revealed four distinct binding regions, one of which contained the CCAAT box region. Another promoter region, termed bp1-B (-2.6 to -3.4 kb), mediated 95% of the total promoter activity in endometrial stromal cells. The bp1-B region also contains multiple regulatory sequences. Mutation and DNase I protection assay suggest that Sp1-like binding site at -2.63 kb was a regulatory site responsible for the activation of IGFBP-1 gene promoter.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

A constitutively active form of CREB can activate expression of the rat prolactin promoter in non-pituitary cells.

The pituitary cell-specific transcription factor Pit-1 has been show to trans-activate expression of the prolactin (PRL) promoter in non-pituitary cells. However, the cyclic AMP response element (CRE)-binding protein CREB is known to play a major role in cell-specific expression of hepatocyte-specific genes. Since the PRL promoter contains an asymmetrical form of a cyclic AMP response element (termed the CLE), we investigated whether CREB could also induce PRL promoter activity in non-pituitary cells. Transient expression in rat glial C6 cells of a constitutively active CREB-VP16 fusion protein strongly trans-activated expression of a co-transfected rat PRL promoter construct, (-187)PRL-CAT. Analysis by 5'-deletion showed that this response requires PRL promoter sequences between positions -113/-75. CREB-VP16 did not stimulate expression in C6 cells of any of three control promoter-CAT constructs, implying that the strong response of the PRL promoter to activated CREB is both promoter-specific, and is not due to non-specific transcriptional effects of the potent VP16 moiety of CREB-VP16. Surprisingly, mutations in the CLE only slightly reduced activation by CREB-VP16 of construct (-204)PRL-CAT, implying that the major action of CREB-VP16 on the PRL promoter does not involve a direct interaction with the CLE. CREB-VP16 stimulated PRL-CAT activity in C6 cells as strongly as, and synergistically with, Pit-1. These results imply that CREB can strongly and specifically activate expression of the PRL promoter in non-pituitary cells, via a mechanism different from that employed by Pit-1.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Functional analysis of the human androgen receptor promoter.

Although androgen receptor levels vary widely during development, our previous studies have suggested that a single promoter is active in a number of human and rat tissues and cell lines. To examine the elements controlling androgen receptor expression, we performed deletion mapping and site-directed mutagenesis of the human androgen receptor promoter and assayed these promoter fusions in human cell lines that produce the androgen receptor as well as those deficient in the androgen receptor, both in the presence and absence of androgen. Our studies identify a region (-74 to +87) surrounding the site of transcription initiation that constitutes the core of the androgen receptor promoter. When assayed in T47D cells (an AR-expressing cell line), this segment was sufficient to direct the expression of reporter genes at levels similar to that observed for larger promoter fragments, and further deletions led to an appreciable loss of promoter activity. DNA sequences surrounding this region appear to modulate the activity of this minimal promoter in a cooperative fashion. Site-directed mutagenesis and mobility shift assays demonstrated the importance of regulatory regions upstream of the transcription initiation site including an SP1 binding site and two segments with similarities to consensus HLH protein binding sites (E-boxes). Androgen treatment did not cause a decrease in activity of any of the transiently transfected promoter fusions tested, suggesting that the promoter does not contain the information necessary for autoregulation or that a posttranscriptional or posttranslational mechanism is responsible for the regulation of AR mRNA by ligand. Furthermore, the androgen receptor promoter fusions displayed differing transcriptional activities when transfected into two cell lines deficient in androgen receptor expression suggesting heterogeneity in the mechanisms responsible for this deficiency.

Cloning, Molecular↗
PubMed1991

The TATA-dependent and TATA-independent promoters of the Drosophila melanogaster actin 5C-encoding gene.

The major cytoskeletal actin of Drosophila melanogaster, actin 5C, is encoded by a gene (act5C) that has two promoters which are differentially controlled and possess distinct sets of regulatory elements. The distal basal promoter has a TATA motif, but the proximal does not. The distal strong positive domain, centered at nucleotide -290, can be shifted and fused directly to the distal basal promoter without losing its activity. It can also activate heterologous basal promoters containing either TATAAAT or TATTTAA signal when directly fused to them, but cannot activate the basal proximal promoter, which is TATA-less. When the entire distal regulatory region, which includes a remote enhancer-like region, is fused to the proximal promoter, it does not increase the proximal promoter activity. Fusion of the distal strong negative domain to the proximal promoter does not inhibit activity. Thus, all the three major strong regulatory domains of the distal promoter are unable to act on the proximal promoter.

Actins↗
PubMed1994

Diversity and relative strength of tandem promoters for the antibiotic-resistance genes of several integrons.

The integron is a new type of mobile element containing one or more antibiotic-resistance-encoding genes site-specifically integrated as cassettes. The integrated genes are expressed from a common promoter region located in an adjacent conserved segment. Sequence analysis has revealed the existence of four versions of the integron promoters. In this study, we have determined the relative strength of the different integron promoters and compared their activity with that of the tac promoter. Each version of the promoter was cloned upstream from a promoter-less chloramphenicol acetyltransferase-encoding gene (cat) in plasmid pKK232-8. CAT activity was used to measure transcriptional expression from the promoters of the antibiotic-resistance operon. The strongest promoter is the version (TTGACAN17TAAACT) found in plasmid R388 and in transposon Tn1696. This promoter is six times more efficient than the derepressed tac promoter.

Acetylation↗
PubMed1995

Steroid hormone receptor status defines the MMTV promoter chromatin structure in vivo.

The ability to respond to small signalling molecules such as steroid hormones is important for many physiological processes. Steroid hormones act through a group of high affinity receptors that regulate transcription by binding to hormone response elements (HREs) located within the promoters of target genes, which themselves are organized with nuclear proteins to form chromatin. To dissect the mechanisms(s) of steroid hormone action we have used the steroid inducible mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter as a model system. The MMTV promoter is assembled into a phased array of nucleosomes that are specifically positioned in rodent cells. Induction of transcription by glucocorticoids is accompanied by the appearance of a hypersensitive region in the proximal promoter which allows the hormone dependent assembly of a preinitiation complex including transcription factors such as nuclear factor 1 (NF1) and the octamer transcription factor (OTF). Surprisingly, when introduced by transient transfection, the progesterone receptor (PR) is unable to activate this promoter in vivo, a finding that may result from its inability to alter MMTV promoter chromatin. In an attempt to investigate the failure of the PR to activate the promoter, we have stably introduced the MMTV promoter into human T47D breast cancer cells that express high levels of the PR. In contrast to what has been observed previously in rodent cells, the MMTV templates resident in human breast cancer cells adopt a novel and constitutively open chromatin structure. The constitutively open chromatin structure is accompanied by the hormone independent loading of transcription factors including the PR and NF1. In T47D cells that stably express the glucocorticoid receptor, the MMTV promoter responds to glucocorticoids, but not progestins, and displays glucocorticoid induced restriction enzyme hypersensitivity and transcription factor loading. These findings suggest that the organization of the MMTV chromatin structure is dependent upon the cell type and receptor status of the recipient cell into which the MMTV promoter is stably introduced.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Analysis of the 5-lipoxygenase promoter and characterization of a vitamin D receptor binding site.

1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D(3) (1,25(OH)(2)D(3)) and transforming growth factor beta (TGFbeta) potently induce 5-lipoxygenase (5-LO) in myeloid cells. We analyzed vitamin D receptor (VDR) binding to putative vitamin D response elements within the 5-LO promoter and analyzed its function by reporter gene analysis. Binding of VDR and retinoid X receptor to the promoter region was shown in DNase I footprinting, electrophoretic mobility shift and chromatin immunoprecipitation assays. However, the identified VDR binding region did not mediate induction of reporter gene activity by 1,25(OH)(2)D(3)/TGFbeta, neither in the 5-LO promoter context nor with the thymidine kinase (tk) promoter. Insertion of the rat atrial natriuretic factor VDRE in reporter plasmids containing the 5-LO promoter diminished induction by 1,25(OH)(2)D(3)/TGFbeta as compared with the tk promoter. Similarly, low inductions were obtained when cells were transiently or stably transfected with constructs containing various 5-LO promoter regions. Concerning basal promoter activity, we identified a positive regulatory region (-779 to -229), which includes the VDR binding region, in 5-LO-positive MonoMac6 cells. In summary, the VDR/RXR complex binds to putative VDREs in the 5-LO promoter, but other sequences outside the 5-LO promoter seem to be responsible or additionally required for the prominent induction of 5-LO mRNA expression by 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) and TGFbeta.

Arachidonate 5-Lipoxygenase↗
PubMed2004

Insertion of an exogenous promoter in the E1A regulatory region of adenovirus does not disturb viral replication despite reduced E1A transcription.

Insertion of an exogenous promoter into adenoviral regulatory regions may result in altered specificity and activity of the integrated promoter-mediated transcription in the context of recombinant adenoviruses (Ad). The alteration is due to the influence of the viral regulatory elements. Specificity of oncolytic Ad, in which the E1A expression is designed to be controlled by a tumor-specific promoter, could thus be modulated by the Ad E1A enhancer/promoters. We prepared recombinant Ad bearing a midkine (MK) promoter region in the 3'-side of the E1A promoter and investigated the relationship between transcriptional activity by the E1A promoter-fused MK fragment and the viral replication. Reporter assays revealed that the transcriptional activity of the fused E1A-MK fragment was significantly lower than that of respective E1A and the MK promoters. However, the replication of the Ad bearing the MK promoter was greater than or comparable to that of wild-type Ad. The present study suggests that the replication of oncolytic Ad in tumors is not directly correlated with the promoter activity to transcribe the E1A gene and that insertion of an exogenous promoter downstream to the E1A regulatory region may not always disturb Ad replication.

Adenoviridae↗
PubMed2004

Identification of nucleotides critical for activity of the sigmaE-dependent rpoEp3 promoter in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium.

We previously described a two-plasmid system for the identification of promoters recognized by Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium) sigmaE. The S. Typhimurium sigmaE-dependent rpoEp3 promoter was active in the E. coli two-plasmid system only after arabinose-induced expression of S. Typhimurium rpoE. In the present study, we have exploited this two-plasmid system for the identification of nucleotides critical for activity of the rpoEp3 promoter. A library of randomly mutated DNA fragments containing the rpoEp3 promoter was cloned upstream of a lacZalpha reporter gene and screened for activity in the presence of S. Typhimurium sigmaE. The clones exhibiting reduced LacZ activity were sequenced to identify the mutations. The activity of the mutated rpoEp3 promoters were studied further using a luciferase-based promoter-probe plasmid. All of the important nucleotides of the rpoEp3 promoter (in capital) were located in the -35 (ggAActt) and -10 (TctaA) regions. The critical nucleotides were also the most conserved in known sigmaE-dependent promoters. The study also revealed the importance of the 16-bp spacing between -10 and -35 region, as reducing the spacing to 15-bp greatly reduced activity of the promoter. This method should be generally applicable for the identification of important nucleotides in the cognate promoters of other sigma factors.

Artificial Gene Fusion↗
PubMed2006

Isolation and characterization of promoters from Lactococcus lactis ssp. cremoris LM0230.

DNA fragments showing promoter activity were obtained from the chromosomal DNA of Lactococcus lactis ssp. cremoris LM0230 by using a promoter-screening vector pBV5030, which contains a promoterless chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene. Ten fragments were identified based on their ability to confer resistance against chloramphenicol in Escherichia coli. DNA sequencing revealed that all the fragments had a consensus region recognized by the sigma factor and only the nucleotide sequence of fragment 15C had the identical consensus region with the promoter P2 from L. lactis ssp. lactis MG1614. To compare their promoter strengths, an E. coli-lactococcal shuttle vector pWL1 containing a luciferase gene as the reporter gene was constructed based on lactococcal plasmid pMG36e. The putative promoter regions of 10 fragments exhibiting promoter activity were characterized in E. coli and L. lactis by measuring the luciferase activity, among which the putative promoter P6C exhibited the highest promoter activity both in E. coli JM109 and L. lactis ssp. cremoris MG1363. The luciferase system endowed significantly different expression levels enough to compare promoter strengths in E. coli and lactococcal host. The transcription-initiation sites of P6C and P13C were mapped by primer extension, which showed that they corresponded to a purine residue. The characterized promoters could be useful for the industrial production of heterologous proteins in L. lactis in case the proteins require a high safety level.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed2005

Analysis and prediction of baculovirus promoter sequences.

Consensus patterns of baculovirus sequences upstream from the translational initiation sites have been analyzed and a web tool, Local Alignment Promoter Predictor (LAPP), for the prediction of baculovirus promoter sequences has also been developed. Potential consensus sequences, i.e., TCATTGT, TCTTGTA, CTCGTAA, TCCATTT and TCATT plus TCGT in approximately 30 bp spacing context, have been found in baculovirus promoter regions, in addition to well-characterized late and early promoter elements G/T/ATAAG and TATAA, which is accompanied about 30-bp downstream by a transcriptional initiation sequence CAGT or CATT. Promoter prediction is performed by a dynamic programming algorithm based on maximal segment pair measure with scores above some cutoff against each sequence in a refined promoter database. The algorithm was able to discriminate between promoter and non-promoter sequences in a test set of baculovirus sequences with prediction specificity and sensitivity superior to that using five other eukaryotic promoter recognition programs available on the Internet. A web server that implements the LAPP with continually updated promoter database is freely available at http://life.zsu.edu.cn/LAPP/.

Algorithms↗