Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “REHABILITATION”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,711 records · Page 95Linked to original sources
PubMed1996

The biopsychosocial disease consequence model in rehabilitation: model development in the Finnish 'work hardening' programme for chronic pain.

To compare the effectiveness of diverse rehabilitation programmes, comparable data about their effects on maintaining or improving the residual function of the rehabilitation patients should be gathered. Current rehabilitation theories and assessment procedures for functioning are not consistent enough for valid comparisons. The rehabilitation theory should be developed to produce coherence and generalizability to the rehabilitation process. The biopsychosocial disease consequence (BPSDC) model for functioning is presented for this purpose. The model describes the rehabilitation process of patients with chronic pain as a three-axial (biopsychosocial) and three-dimensional (disease consequences) assessment and intervention grid for functioning. It emphasizes the strict mutual relationship between the assessment procedures and intervention plans. Application of the BPSDC model in the Finnish AKSELI project studying the effects of two different programmes on patients with chronic low-back pain is described. Although the AKSELI studies indicated that in addition to the assessment procedures other factors also contributed to valid evaluation of outcomes, and it is hoped that the BPSDC model will encourage researchers to look for definitions of functioning, to assess functioning according to theoretical assumptions about the sub-areas of functioning, and to provide comparable outcome data for the evaluation of various programmes.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed1995

[Ambulatory geriatric rehabilitation--concepts, chances and responsibilities of participating physicians].

The third stage of the bill of the health structure (GSG) still focuses on the tremendous increase of costs in hospitals. Hospitals are accused that the care of the older patients involves too much money and staff. Experts complain that geriatric-rehabilitative thinking and acting does hardly influence the daily work on the wards. Competent geriatric rehabilitation should diminish or prevent the need for nursing, should support the patients ability for self-sufficiency, and decrease hospitalization time. Since the expenses for the hospital care of older patients have increased during the last couple of years and show the greatest dynamic of increase together with the supply of aids, health politicians and health economists, physicians, health insurances, and social insurances set more and more medical and economic hope on the geriatric rehabilitation. Especially models of out of hospital programs in connection with panel doctors are discussed to relieve the hospitals and are favoured by legal institutions and health politicians. Despite the documented success of geriatric rehabilitation, it is surprising the only a few areas realize differentiated out of hospital concepts. This article summarizes the most important models of out of hospital geriatric rehabilitation as they are tested in different areas in Germany. Advantages and disadvantages are discussed and the demands of the participating physicians are demonstrated. The goal of this paper is to describe the medical role in these models to win more physicians for this task. The urgently necessary development of a country-wide out of hospital rehabilitation, introduces new important medical fields of activity.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Outpatient cardiac rehabilitation: are the potential benefits being realised?

OBJECTIVE: to give a comprehensive description of the practice of outpatient cardiac rehabilitation in Scotland. DESIGN: an identifying survey of 1,270 individuals in hospital, general practice and community sources nationally, followed by computer-assisted telephone interviews about programme characteristics with key personnel from identified cardiac rehabilitation schemes. OUTCOME MEASURES: patient provision, referral criteria and programme features. RESULTS: 65 programmes provided outpatient cardiac rehabilitation for 4,980 patients in one year, representing 17% of the 29,180 patients who survived admission to hospital with coronary heart disease. Cardiac rehabilitation practice varied widely: 53 (82%) programmes included exercise, although only 19 (29%) at the most beneficial level; 40 (62%) included relaxation training, although only three (5%) at a level shown to give benefit; 47 (72%) included education, although only 16 (25%) in a manner with reported benefits in randomised trials. CONCLUSIONS: outpatient cardiac rehabilitation was provided to a minority of patients with coronary heart disease. Programmes varied widely, and were often more limited than those reporting mortality and morbidity benefits in randomised trials. There is a substantial gap between current provision and practice of cardiac rehabilitation and that advocated in published guidelines.

Community Health Services↗
PubMed1997

Outcomes and costs after hip fracture and stroke. A comparison of rehabilitation settings.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether outcomes and costs differ for elderly patients admitted to rehabilitation hospitals, subacute nursing homes, and traditional nursing homes. DESIGN: Inception cohort stratified by provider type and followed prospectively for 6 months. SETTING: A total of 92 hospital-based units and freestanding facilities from 17 states. PATIENTS: A total of 518 randomly selected patients with hip fracture and 485 stroke patients admitted from November 1991 to February 1994. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: At 6 months comparing community residence, recovery to premorbid levels in 5 activities of daily living (ADLs), Medicare costs, and the number of therapy and physician visits. Outcomes were adjusted for premorbid residence and function, caregiver availability, comorbid illness, admission function, cognition, depression, sensory deficits, and mobility impairments. RESULTS: On admission, rehabilitation hospital patients were more likely (P<.001) to have caregivers and better cognitive and physical function. Hip fracture patients admitted to rehabilitation hospitals did not differ from patients admitted to nursing homes in returning to the community (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6-2.6) or in the number of ADLs recovered to premorbid level (difference, 0.09 ADL; 95% CI, -0.27-0.44), but stroke patients admitted to rehabilitation hospitals were more likely to return to the community (adjusted OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.5-7.2) and recover ADLs (difference, 0.63 ADL; 95% CI, 0.20-1.07). Subacute nursing home patients with stroke were more likely than traditional nursing home patients to return to the community (adjusted OR, 6.8; 95% CI, 2.2-21.4), there was no difference in return to the community for patients with hip fracture (adjusted OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 0.7-3.6), and there were no differences in recovery of ADLs for either condition. Medicare costs were greater (P<.001) for rehabilitation hospital patients than for subacute nursing home patients, and the costs for subacute nursing home patients were greater (P=.03 for stroke and .009 for hip fracture) than for traditional nursing home patients. CONCLUSIONS: Study findings are consistent with enhanced outcomes for elderly patients with stroke treated in rehabilitation hospitals but not for patients with hip fracture. Subacute nursing homes were more effective than traditional nursing homes in returning patients with stroke to the community, despite comparable functional outcomes.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed1996

[Possibilities for greater flexibility in a cardiologic rehabilitation clinic by supplementary ambulatory/partial inpatient therapeutic services].

This study shows that additional outpatient/partially inpatient treatment provided in a cardiological rehabilitation hospital effectively complements inpatient rehabilitation treatment but does not replace it. Our flexible system which comprises a shorter stay in hospital and subsequent partially inpatient treatment allows more intensive treatment of the patient in the early phase of rehabilitation. It supports patients when they have returned home and have to test out how they manage with their restricted physical and mental performance in their social environment. It appears possible to develop criteria to select the individually appropriate form of treatment. The introduction of outpatient/partially inpatient therapy in a cardiological rehabilitation hospital does not appear to entail disadvantages for the patients. It contributes to more flexible, and in particular to more individualized, treatment. The ongoing pilot projects will show whether in the final analysis this will also entail a saving of costs. Not only in view of their specialist competence are the cardiological rehabilitation hospitals suitable and able to participate in measures to increase the flexibility of cardiological rehabilitation. They should therefore either completely integrate outpatient/partially inpatient methods in their concept of therapy or after a shortened inpatient treatment. They should then evaluate these methods so as to be able to contribute to an informed discussion on this topic. This also would mean that available resources would be better utilized, which would in addition be of particular importance at present, in a situation dominated by discussions of costs.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

[Improvement in occupational rehabilitation of myocardial infarct patients--results of a model study in Rhineland-Pfalz].

In a pilot trial in Rhineland-Palatinate two instruments for optimizing medical and occupational rehabilitation of myocardial infarction patients were tested: (1) A regional cardiology working group was founded which selected measures to accelerate the rehabilitation process in model region hospitals. (2) At the pilot rehabilitation clinic a counselling service for patients under a case management trial scheme was established. The evaluation showed that three weeks after the heart attack, exercise ECGs were carried out in 77.1% of pilot trial patients (case group) as opposed to only 54.5% of patients receiving standard treatment (control group). During in-patient rehabilitation, a higher proportion of case patients discussed their return to work with their employers. After rehabilitation, the occupational future still was uncertain in 13.2% of the case group, in contrast with 29.5% of the control group. 91.8% of case group patients (64% of controls) had been briefed about support possibilities facilitating a stepwise return to work according to section 74 SGB V; half a year following the beginning of rehabilitation, case group patients were reentergrated into working life in 56.3% (50% of controls).

Adult↗
PubMed1997

[Social rehabilitation and earning capacity].

Social rehabilitation, if contrasted with medical and vocational rehabilitation, has hitherto remained a residual category. Vocational resettlement, in conjunction with medical outcome, being the central criterion of successful rehabilitation, it is only on failure in that respect that social rehabilitation aspects come into view. Developments in the society at large, such as changing values, individualization and differentiation of life styles, as well as mass unemployment, working world rationalization, a fragmented labour market and a trend towards shorter working lives, however, warrant renewed attention to the relationship among vocational and social rehabilitation. The problems involved in returning to work after coronary bypass surgery serve to show that occupational resettlement is strongly dependent on the work orientation a patient has developed over his life course as well as on the overall socioeconomic conditions at hand. The ICIDH and its concept of social handicap provides a useful point of departure in seeking to develop a theoretical interpretation of these findings and to expand them towards a systematic concept of social rehabilitation.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

[Geriatric rehabilitation from the economic viewpoint].

Geriatric rehabilitation has to be evaluated by cost-effectiveness measures and not only by effectiveness. This is also true for quality improvement actions. Quality can be too expensive according to its cost-effectiveness relationship. In Germany mandatory nursing insurance share in successful rehabilitation means a loss of financial resources to the nursing family members and to the nursing homes. The health funds which have to finance the rehabilitation are also not favored by the results. So rehabilitation is on a low level in the mandatory nursing insurance. Helpful would be to transfer rehabilitation from the health funds to the nursing funds. In the long run geriatric rehabilitation will win importance by the socio-demographic development.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

[Patient satisfaction in rehabilitation of musculoskeletal diseases--effect of patient characteristics, treatment, evaluation schedule and correlation with treatment outcome].

Within quality assurance in medical rehabilitation, patient satisfaction is viewed as one of the essential features. Patient satisfaction is expected to comprehensively cover structure, process and outcome quality. The aim of our study was to evaluate factors on which patient satisfaction with the rehabilitation measure depends. Sociodemographic factors, diagnosis at admission, characteristics of treatment, and the time of evaluation were considered. Furthermore, we examined whether four orthopedic-rheumatologic rehabilitation hospitals differ in respect of patient satisfaction and how patient satisfaction is associated with the result of treatment. Data collection was conducted in four German rehabilitation hospitals. Patient satisfaction was assessed in 1832 patients with an orthopedicrheumatologic disease as first diagnosis three months after discharge, using a postal questionnaire (Raspe et al. 1996). Additionally, 153 patients were assessed at the end of the rehabilitation measure. Besides the satisfaction with the treatment, its result was documented for 100 patients. For all sections of the questionnaire no or small differences could be demonstrated with respect to gender, age, education, and diagnosis. The questionnaire can differentiate between treating physicians and hospitals. The time of questioning had no influence. No relevant correlation existed between patient satisfaction and result of the treatment. The questionnaire assessing patient satisfaction can be applied with little expenditure. The acceptance is high. The questionnaire can assess the current status of many areas of rehabilitation practice, so that quality assurance measures could be introduced immediately. A comparison between hospitals is possible and reveals strengths and weaknesses. Thus, the questionnaire may be used as a quality assurance measure for hospitals and for health care providers. This tool may be used routinely for monitoring and for longitudinal evaluations.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

[Development of a guideline for rehabilitation of patients with low back pain-- phase 2: analysis of data of the classification of therapeutic procedures].

Initiated by the Federal Insurance Institute for Salaried Employees (BfA, Bundesversicherungsanstalt für Angestellte), the project is aimed at developing an evidence-based guideline for rehabilitation of patients with low back pain (LBP). Guideline development will be based on a systematic review of the literature, an analysis of the treatment procedures currently employed in rehabilitation, inclusion of the patients' perspectives as well as consultation of experts' panels of clinically experienced physicians and therapists. Formulation of the guideline will then be carried out in a structured consensus building process. This article is focused on analysing the present situation with regard to the treatments received by patients insured by the BfA, using data from routine documentation according to the Classification of Therapeutic Procedures (KTL, Klassifikation Therapeutischer Leistungen). The analysis is intended to provide indications of a basic need to implement a common guideline as well as, simultaneously, to explore possible deficits in present treatment practices, hence to define priorities requiring special attention in the framework of guideline development. As a result of a systematic literature review, the KTL-defined therapeutic procedures that had emerged as relevant in the rehabilitation of LBP patients were aggregated into so-called therapeutic modules which then formed the basis of the analysis. In all, more than 46,000 KTL-data of 2438 patients with a diagnosis of "low back pain" (M54.5 ICD-10) were included. In the rehab centres investigated, rehabilitation of patients with LBP follows a multidimensional, multiprofessional therapeutic strategy. More than 90 % of all patients receive treatments from the modules "medical training therapy", "health education", "physiotherapy", and "physical therapy". Treatments provided to a majority of the patients are massage (78 %), electrotherapy (67 %) as well as psychotherapy (68 %). Women more frequently than men receive therapies belonging to the "psychological treatments" and "occupational therapies" modules; younger patients receive more of the "training therapies", and more often. When treatments are compared across centres, a large variability in the therapeutic procedures provided becomes apparent. This high degree of variability suggests that development and implementation of a common clinical practice guideline for rehabilitation of patients with chronic low back pain should receive priority attention.

Combined Modality Therapy↗
PubMed1965

[SOME CONSIDERATIONS ON THE EDUCATION OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION].

Particularly since World War II physical medicine and rehabilitation have assumed a growing importance. The efforts of the Canadian Association of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, following a survey of Canadian universities, to increase the theoretical and practical teaching of physiatrics are emphasized. It is considered important that the teaching of physical medicine and rehabilitation should be carried out concurrently with other medical and surgical teaching programs. Paramedical and auxiliary rehabilitation personnel should participate in the teaching program. The number of hours devoted to physiatrics should be increased, and the medical student should be permitted to choose physical medicine and rehabilitation as a part of his internship program.

Canada↗
PubMed2005

[Cardiac rehabilitation after cardiovascular surgery in elderly patients].

We assessed whether cardiac rehabilitation after acquired cardiovascular surgery in octogenarians was helpful to return daily life or not. Among overall 3,050 patients in these 10 years, 130 patients (4.3%) aged 80 years or older underwent cardiovascular surgery in our institute. Cardiac rehabilitation program in hospital was achieved in 118 octogenarians after surgery. Physical and phychological activity had improved by means of this program. Notably, observational rehabilitation on monitor and examination of anaerobic threshold (AT) point were of great importance to evaluate the efficacy of cardiac rehabilitation. Thereby, hospital stay after surgery was longer than usual, mean hospital stay was 32.1 +/- 5.1 days. Future perspectives of cardiac rehabilitation in an outpatient would be expected.

Aged↗
PubMed1981

Rehabilitation for lower extremity amputation.

The results of rehabilitation for lower-extremity amputation were analyzed to assess the impact of a center that used a coordinated team combined with modern surgical and prosthetic techniques. Data for group 1 patients (amputated between July 1, 1975, and June 30, 1977) demonstrated a healing rate of 63%, a mean rehabilitation time of 128 days, a mean hospitalization time of 68 days, and a rehabilitation rate of 69% for those who could walk prior to amputation. Data for group 2 (amputated between July 1, 1977, and July 30, 1979) demonstrated an amputation healing rate of 97%, an average rehabilitation time of 30.8 days, a mean hospitalization time of 38 days, and a rehabilitation rate of 100% for those patients who could walk before amputation. There was no difference between groups 1 and 2 in surgical mortality; all other variables, however, showed significant improvement for group 2 patients. Comparison within the same institution of the results of rehabilitation for lower-extremity amputation before and after the initiation of a dedicated amputation center clearly demonstrated the superiority of the center concept.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Multidisciplinary bio-psycho-social rehabilitation for chronic low back pain.

BACKGROUND: Chronic low back pain is, in many countries, the main cause of long term disability in middle age. Patients with chronic low back pain are often referred for multidisciplinary treatment. Previous published systematic reviews on this topic included no randomised controlled trials and pooled together controlled and non-controlled studies. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of multidisciplinary bio-psycho-social rehabilitation on pain, function, employment, quality of life and global assessment outcomes in subjects with chronic disabling low back pain. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychLIT, CINAHL, Health STAR, and The Cochrane Library from the beginning of the database to June 1998 using the comprehensive search strategy recommended by the Back Review Group of the Cochrane Collaboration. INTERVENTION specific key words for this review were: patient care team, patient care management, multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, multiprofessional, multimodal, pain clinic and functional restoration. We also reviewed reference lists and consulted the editors of the Back Review Group of the Cochrane Collaboration. SELECTION CRITERIA DESIGN: randomised controlled trials comparing multidisciplinary bio-psycho-social rehabilitation with a non-multidisciplinary control intervention. POPULATION: Adults with disabling low back pain of more than three months in duration. INTERVENTION: Patients had to be assessed and treated by qualified professionals according to a plan that addresses physical and at least one of psychological, or social/occupational dimensions. OUTCOMES: Only trials which reported treatment effect in at least one of pain, function, employment status, quality of life or global improvement. Exclusion: Pure educational interventions (back schools) and pure physical interventions were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Selection, data extraction and quality grading of studies was done by two independent reviewers using pre-tested data forms. Study quality was assessed according to the scheme recommended by the Back Review Group of the Cochrane Collaboration. Trials with internal validity scores of five or more in a ten point scale were considered high quality. Discrepancies between reviewers were resolved by consensus or by a third reviewer. Given the marked heterogeneity in study settings, interventions and control groups we decided not to pool trial results in a meta-analysis. Instead, we summarized findings by strength of evidence and nature of intervention and control treatments. The evidence was judged to be strong when multiple high quality trials produced generally consistent findings. It was judged to be moderate when multiple low quality or one high quality and one or more low quality trials produced generally consistent findings. Evidence was considered to be limited when only one randomised trial existed or if findings of existing trials were inconsistent. MAIN RESULTS: Ten trials (12 randomised comparisons) were included. They randomised a total of 1964 patients with chronic low back pain. There was strong evidence that intensive multidisciplinary bio-psycho-social rehabilitation with a functional restoration approach improved function when compared with inpatient or outpatient non-multidisciplinary treatments. There was moderate evidence that intensive multidisciplinary bio-psycho-social rehabilitation with a functional restoration approach improved pain when compared with outpatient non-multidisciplinary rehabilitation or usual care. There was contradictory evidence regarding vocational outcomes of intensive multidisciplinary bio-psycho-social intervention. Some trials reported improvements in work readiness, but others showed no significant reduction in sickness leaves. Less intensive outpatient psycho-physical treatments did not improve pain, function or vocational outcomes when compared with non-multidisciplinary outpatient therapy or usual care. Few trials reported effects on quality of life or global assessments. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The reviewed trials provide evidence that intensive multidisciplinary bio-psycho-social rehabilitation with a functional restoration approach improves pain and function. Less intensive interventions did not show improvements in clinically relevant outcomes.

Back Pain↗
PubMed2000

Biopsychosocial rehabilitation for upper limb repetitive strain injuries in working age adults.

BACKGROUND: Upper limb repetitive strain injury is a common problem in western countries, causing human suffering and huge economical losses. Patients with prolonged pain associated with repetitive tasks in the work place can face both psychological and physical difficulties. Different treatment programmes, physical, psychological, behavioural, social and occupational treatments have been developed and used to help these patients. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this systematic review is to determine the effectiveness of biopsychosocial rehabilitation for upper limb repetitive strain injuries among working age adults. SEARCH STRATEGY: The reviewed studies for this structured Cochrane review were identified from electronic bibliographic databases, the Science Citation Index, reference checking and consulting experts in the rehabilitation field. The original search was planned and performed for a more broad area of musculoskeletal disorders. Trials on repetitive strain injuries were separated afterwards. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials and controlled trials comparing biopsychosocial measures for the treatment of repetitive upper limb strain injury in working age adults DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two experts in the field of rehabilitation evaluated the clinical relevance and applicability of the findings of the selected studies to actual clinical use. Two other blinded reviewers extracted the data and assessed the main results and the methodological quality of the studies using standardized forms. Finally, a qualitative analysis was performed to evaluate the level of scientific evidence for the effectiveness of biopsychosocial rehabilitation. MAIN RESULTS: We found only two relevant studies that satisfied our criteria. They assessed the effectiveness of two specific interventions and were both considered as low quality trials. The clinical relevance of the included studies was also unsatisfactory. The level of scientific evidence for the effectiveness of biopsychosocial rehabilitation for repetitive strain injuries was limited. One small trial found that hypnosis supplementary to comprehensive treatment can decrease the intensity of pain for acute RSI in six weeks follow-up. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that presently there appears to be little scientific evidence for the effectiveness of biopsychosocial rehabilitation on repetitive strain injuries. As RCTs on more intensive and comprehensive biopsychosocial treatment programmes for RSI are lacking, there does not seem to be reliable data for these interventions. There is a need for high quality trials in this field.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Rehabilitation after lumbar disc surgery.

BACKGROUND: Although several rehabilitation programs, physical fitness programs or protocols regarding instruction for patients to return to work after lumbar disc surgery have been suggested, little is known about the efficacy and effectiveness of these treatments. There are still persistent fears of causing re-injury, re-herniation, or instability. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of active treatments that are used in the rehabilitation after first-time lumbar disc surgery. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Psyclit databases up to April 2000 and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register 2001, Issue 3. SELECTION CRITERIA: Both randomized and non-randomized controlled trials on any type of active rehabilitation program after first-time disc surgery were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two independent reviewers performed the inclusion of studies and two other reviewers independently performed the methodological quality assessment. A rating system that consists of four levels of scientific evidence summarizes the results. MAIN RESULTS: Thirteen studies were included, six of which were of high quality. There is no strong evidence for the effectiveness for any treatment starting immediately post-surgery, mainly because of lack of (good quality) studies. For treatments that start four to six weeks post-surgery there is strong evidence (level 1) that intensive exercise programs are more effective on functional status and faster return to work (short-term follow-up) as compared to mild exercise programs and there is strong evidence (level 1) that on long term follow up there is no difference between intensive exercise programs and mild exercise programs with regard to overall improvement. For all other primary outcome measures for the comparison between intensive and mild exercise programs there is conflicting evidence (level 3) with regard to long-term follow-up. Furthermore, there is no strong evidence for the effectiveness of supervised training as compared to home exercises. There was also no strong evidence for the effectiveness of multidisciplinary rehabilitation as compared to usual care. There is limited evidence (level 3) that treatments in working populations that aim at return to work are more effective than usual care with regard to return to work. Also, there is limited evidence (level 3) that low-tech and high-tech exercises, started more than 12 months post-surgery are more effective in improving low back functional status as compared to physical agents, joint manipulations or no treatment. Finally, there is no strong evidence for the effectiveness of any specific intervention when added to an exercise program, regardless of whether exercise programs start immediately post-surgery or later. None of the investigated treatments seem harmful with regard to re-herniation or re-operation. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence that patients need to have their activities restricted after first time lumbar disc surgery. There is strong evidence for intensive exercise programs (at least if started about 4-6 weeks post-operative) on short term for functional status and faster return to work and there is no evidence they increase the re-operation rate. It is unclear what the exact content of post-surgery rehabilitation should be. Moreover, there are no studies that investigated whether active rehabilitation programs should start immediately post-surgery or possibly four to six weeks later.

Exercise Therapy↗
PubMed2003

Cognitive rehabilitation and cognitive training for early-stage Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia.

BACKGROUND: Memory problems are a defining feature of the early stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and vascular dementia. Cognitive training and cognitive rehabilitation are specific approaches designed to address everyday memory difficulties. OBJECTIVES: The main aim was to evaluate the effectiveness and impact of cognitive training and cognitive rehabilitation interventions aimed at improving memory functioning for people in the early stages of Alzheimer's disease or vascular dementia. The two types of intervention were considered separately. SEARCH STRATEGY: The CDCIG Specialized Register, which contains records from MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and many other databases, was searched on 9 April 2003. SELECTION CRITERIA: RCTs comparing cognitive rehabilitation or cognitive training interventions with comparison conditions, and reporting outcomes for the person with dementia and/or the family caregiver, were considered for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Six studies reporting cognitive training interventions were included. Statistical analyses were conducted to provide an indication of intervention effect sizes. Data from ordinal scales was treated as continuous, and a fixed effects model was applied in calculating weighted mean differences and 95% confidence intervals. No studies were found that reported a fully individualised cognitive rehabilitation approach. MAIN RESULTS: None of the six studies reporting cognitive training interventions demonstrated any statistically significant effects in any domain, although there were indications of some modest, non-significant effects in various domains of cognitive functioning. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The present findings do not provide strong support for the use of cognitive training interventions for people with early-stage AD or vascular dementia, although these findings must be viewed with caution due to the limited number of RCTs available and to the methodological limitations identified, and further well-designed trials would help to provide more definitive evidence. Due to a complete absence of RCTs evaluating an individualised cognitive rehabilitation approach, It is not possible at present to draw conclusions about the efficacy of individualised cognitive rehabilitation interventions for people with early-stage dementia, and further research is required in this area.

Alzheimer Disease↗
PubMed2002

Rehabilitation for distal radial fractures in adults.

BACKGROUND: Fracture of the distal radius is a common clinical problem, particularly in older white women with osteoporosis. OBJECTIVES: To examine the evidence for effectiveness of rehabilitation intervention(s) for adults with conservatively or surgically treated distal radial fractures. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Injuries Group specialised register (January 2002), the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2001), the Cochrane Rehabilitation and Related Therapies Field database, MEDLINE (1966 to January 2002), EMBASE (1988 to 2001 Week 50), CINAHL (1982 to December Week 2 2001), Current Controlled Trials (December 2001), AMED, PEDro, conference proceedings and reference lists of articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised or quasi-randomised clinical trials evaluating rehabilitation as part of the management of fractures of the distal radius sustained by skeletally mature patients. Rehabilitation interventions such as active and passive mobilisation exercises, and training for activities of daily living, could be used on their own or in combination, and be applied in various ways by various clinicians. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: All trials meeting the selection criteria were independently assessed by all three reviewers for methodological quality. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers. The trials were grouped into categories relating to the main comparisons, and to when the intervention(s) commenced (for example, during or after plaster cast immobilisation). Quantitative data are presented using relative risks or mean differences together with 95 per cent confidence limits. MAIN RESULTS: Twelve trials, involving 601 mainly female and older patients, were included. Initial treatment was conservative, involving plaster cast immobilisation, in all but 20 patients whose fractures were fixed surgically. Though some trials were well conducted, others were methodologically compromised. No trial provided definitive evidence. Only very limited pooling of results from comparable trials was possible. During immobilisation, there was weak evidence of improved hand function in the short term, but not in the longer term, for early occupational therapy (1 trial), and of a lack of differences in outcome between supervised and unsupervised exercises (1 trial). Post-immobilisation, there was weak evidence of a lack of clinically significant differences in outcome in patients receiving formal rehabilitation therapy (3 trials), passive mobilisation (2 trials) or whirlpool immersion (1 trial) compared with no intervention. There was weak evidence of a short-term benefit of continuous passive motion (post external fixation) (1 trial), intermittent pneumatic compression (1 trial) and ultrasound (1 trial). There was weak evidence of better short-term hand function in patients given physiotherapy than in those given instructions for home exercises by a surgeon (1 trial). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence from randomised trials is insufficient to establish the relative effectiveness of the various interventions used in the rehabilitation of adults with fractures of the distal radius.

Adult↗