PubMed2005
A new light was shed on the utility of neural grafts when it was recognized that donor tissues and cells offer more than a source of immature progenitors potentially capable of cell replacement: First, they have the inherent capacity to produce multiple trophic and tropic factors promoting cell survival and tissue plasticity often characteristic of the immature central nervous system (CNS). Second, by their interaction with the host microenvironment via cell/cell and cell/ECM interactions, these grafts are capable of re-establishing homeostasis, which can be, for example, reflected in rescue and protection of host elements from harmful influences. This second capacity of donor cells relies, in part, also on a "dormant" but still present regenerative capacity of mature or even aged CNS and on the possibility of its mobilization in the damaged nervous system by neural grafts. For this to occur efficiently after transplantation, a bi-directional dialogue between donor and host cells must gradually be established, in which both "partners" transmit signals (cell/cell contact, molecular messengers), "listen to" and "understand" each other and are able to react by modifying their own plasticity- and development-related programs. Thus, for the best possible recovery of functionality in the injured adult and aged nervous system, neurotransplantation must always try to find optimal conditions for all three of the mentioned qualities of neural grafts, especially for the protection and/or reactivation of neural circuitry embedded in non-neurogenic CNS areas. Once fully understood, this newly recognized aspect of neurotransplantation (and topic of this review) might, someday, even allow the recovery of systems that would otherwise be doomed, such as cognition- and experience-related circuitry.