Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Cell Cycle Checkpoints”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,711 records · Page 95Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

Cell cycle arrest determines the intensity of the global transcriptional response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to ionizing radiation.

Whole-genome analysis was performed using DNA microarrays to define the changes in the gene expression patterns occurring in Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells exposed to ionizing radiation. The effects of sublethal dose on wild-type, rad53 (enhanced sensitivity to radiation and impaired in a cell cycle damage checkpoint), and rad6 (enhanced sensitivity to radiation and functional cell cycle block by radiation) mutant backgrounds and of a higher dose on the wild-type and G(2)-phase-arrested cells were analyzed. Several gene pathways were identified as being implicated in the response to radiation. In particular, the cell cycle blockage that occurred in the wild-type strain after a high radiation dose and in the rad6 mutant after a lower dose entailed modifications of defined gene expression patterns, which are described here and are compared with the gene modulation patterns observed in the rad53 strain in the absence of efficient blockage. Loss of the RAD53 function caused a major increase in the number of genes modulated by radiation. Given that Rad53-Sad1p, the protein encoded by RAD53, has functions other than those directly connected to cell cycle arrest, we determined the gene patterns that were modulated upon irradiation of rad53 cells that had been forced to arrest in G(2) phase by nocodazole treatment. These differential whole-genome analyses shed light on the multiplicity of functions of the pivotal Rad53-Sad1p protein. The results obtained describe how the cells respond to different irradiation conditions by modulating important gene classes, including those associated with stress defense, ribosomal proteins, histones, ergosterol and GCR1-controlled sugar metabolism.

Cell Cycle↗
PubMed2006

Vinegar flies turn to porto for cell division cycle meeting.

The Third International Workshop on Drosophila Cell Division Cycle brought together researchers focusing on DNA replication, mitosis, meiosis, cell cycle regulation, checkpoints, asymmetric division, cell and tissue growth, and tumorgenesis. This review describes new findings presented at the meeting that particularly highlight the advantages of the Drosophila systems.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors: novel anticancer agents.

In current models of cell cycle control, the transition between different cell cycle states is regulated at checkpoints. Transition through the cell-cycle is induced by a family of protein kinase holoenzymes, the cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) and their heterodimeric cyclin partner. Orderly progression through the cell-cycle involves co-ordinated activation of the CDKs, which in the presence of an associated CDK-activating kinase, phosphorylate target substrates including members of the 'pocket protein' family. This family includes the product of the retinoblastoma susceptibility gene (the pRb protein) and the related p107 and p130 proteins. Activity of these holoenzymes is regulated by post-translational modification. Phosphorylation of inhibitory sites on a conserved threonine residue within the activation segment is regulated by CDK7/cyclin H, referred to as CDK-activating kinase [1]. In addition, the cdc25 phosphatases activate the CDKs by dephosphorylating their inhibitory tyrosine and threonine phosphorylated residues [2,3]. Among the many roles for endogenous inhibitors (CDKIs), including members of the p21(CIP1/Waf1) family and the p16 family, one role is to regulate cyclin activity. Cellular neoplastic transformation is accompanied by loss of regulation of cell cycle checkpoints in conjunction with aberrant expression of CDKs and/or cyclins and the loss or mutation of the negative regulators (the CDKIs or the pocket protein pRb). One strategy to inhibit malignant cellular proliferation involves inhibiting CDK activity or enhancing function of the CDKI. Novel inhibitors of CDKs showing promise in the clinic include flavopiridol and UCN-01, which show early evidence of human tolerability in clinical trials. This review examines pertinent advances in the field of CDK inhibitors.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Sub-cellular localisation of GFP-tagged tobacco mitotic cyclins during the cell cycle and after spindle checkpoint activation.

We have previously shown that the tobacco cyclin B1;1 protein accumulates during the G2 phase of the cell cycle and is subsequently destroyed during mitosis. Here, we investigated the sub-cellular localisation of two different B1-types and one A3-type cyclin during the cell cycle by using confocal imaging and differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy. The cyclins were visualised as GFP-tagged fusion proteins in living tobacco cells. Both B1-type cyclins were found in the cytoplasm and in the nucleus during G2 but when cells entered into prophase, both cyclins became associated with condensing chromatin and remained on chromosomes until metaphase. As cells exited metaphase, the B1-type cyclins became degraded, as shown by time-lapse images. A stable variant of cyclin B1;1-GFP fusion protein, in which the destruction box had been mutated, maintained its association with the nuclear material at later phases of mitosis such as anaphase and telophase. Furthermore, we demonstrated that cyclin B1;1 protein is stabilised in metaphase-arrested cells after microtubule destabilising drug treatments. In contrast to the B1-type cyclins, the cyclin A3;1 was found exclusively in the nucleus in interphase cells and disappeared earlier than the cyclin B1 proteins during mitosis.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1989

Checkpoints: controls that ensure the order of cell cycle events.

The events of the cell cycle of most organisms are ordered into dependent pathways in which the initiation of late events is dependent on the completion of early events. In eukaryotes, for example, mitosis is dependent on the completion of DNA synthesis. Some dependencies can be relieved by mutation (mitosis may then occur before completion of DNA synthesis), suggesting that the dependency is due to a control mechanism and not an intrinsic feature of the events themselves. Control mechanisms enforcing dependency in the cell cycle are here called checkpoints. Elimination of checkpoints may result in cell death, infidelity in the distribution of chromosomes or other organelles, or increased susceptibility to environmental perturbations such as DNA damaging agents. It appears that some checkpoints are eliminated during the early embryonic development of some organisms; this fact may pose special problems for the fidelity of embryonic cell division.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

The phosphotyrosyl phosphatase activator, Ncs1p (Rrd1p), functions with Cla4p to regulate the G(2)/M transition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae p21-activated kinases, Ste20p and Cla4p, have individual functions but appear to share an essential function(s) as well because a strain lacking both kinases is inviable. To learn more about the shared function, we sought new mutations that were lethal in the absence of CLA4. This approach led to the identification of at least 10 complementation groups designated NCS (need CLA4 to survive). As for ste20 cla4-75 mutants, most ncs cla4-75 double mutants were defective for septin localization during budding. One group, NCS1/RRD1 (YIL153w), did not confer this defect, however, and we investigated its function further. ncs1Delta cla4Delta cells arrested with elongated buds and short mitotic spindles. The morphological defects and lethality were suppressed by mutations that abrogate the cell cycle morphogenetic checkpoint, CDC28Y19F or swe1Delta. The connection to the cell cycle may be direct, as we detected a Cla4p-Cdc28p complex. NCS1 encodes a protein with significant similarity to a mammalian phosphotyrosyl phosphatase activator (PTPA) regulatory subunit for type 2A protein phosphatases (PP2As). Genetic and biochemical evidence suggested that the phosphatase Sit4p is a target for Ncs1p. First, CLA4 and SIT4 were synthetically lethal. Second, Ncs1p and its yeast paralog, Noh1p (Rrd2p), bound to the catalytic domain of Sit4p in vitro, and Ncs1p could be immunoprecipitated with Sit4p but not with another PP2A (Pph21p) from yeast cell extracts. Strains lacking both NCS1 and NOH1 were inviable and arrested as unbudded cells, implying that PTPA function is required for proper G(1) progression.

CDC28 Protein Kinase, S cerevisiae↗
PubMed1996

rad-dependent response of the chk1-encoded protein kinase at the DNA damage checkpoint.

Exposure of eukaryotic cells to agents that generate DNA damage results in transient arrest of progression through the cell cycle. In fission yeast, the DNA damage checkpoint associated with cell cycle arrest before mitosis requires the protein kinase p56chk1. DNA damage induced by ultraviolet light, gamma radiation, or a DNA-alkylating agent has now been shown to result in phosphorylation of p56chk1. This phosphorylation decreased the mobility of p56chk1 on SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and was abolished by a mutation in the p56chk1 catalytic domain, suggesting that it might represent autophosphorylation. Phosphorylation of p56chk1 did not occur when other checkpoint genes were inactive. Thus, p56chk1 appears to function downstream of several of the known Schizosaccharomyces pombe checkpoint gene products, including that encoded by rad3+, a gene with sequence similarity to the ATM gene mutated in patients with ataxia telangiectasia. The phosphorylation of p56chk1 provides an assayable biochemical response to activation of the DNA damage checkpoint in the G2 phase of the cell cycle.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗
PubMed1997

Cdc25 mitotic inducer targeted by chk1 DNA damage checkpoint kinase.

Arrest of the cell cycle at the G2 checkpoint, induced by DNA damage, requires inhibitory phosphorylation of the kinase Cdc2 in both fission yeast and human cells. The kinase Wee1 and the phosphatase Cdc25, which regulate Cdc2 phosphorylation, were evaluated as targets of Chk1, a kinase essential for the checkpoint. Fission yeast cdc2-3w Deltacdc25 cells, which express activated Cdc2 and lack Cdc25, were responsive to Wee1 but insensitive to Chk1 and irradiation. Expression of large amounts of Chk1 produced the same phenotype as did loss of the cdc25 gene in cdc2-3w cells. Cdc25 associated with Chk1 in vivo and was phosphorylated when copurified in Chk1 complexes. These findings identify Cdc25, but not Wee1, as a target of the DNA damage checkpoint.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗
PubMed2001

S phase and G2 arrests induced by topoisomerase I poisons are dependent on ATR kinase function.

ATR, a human phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-related kinase, is an important component of the cellular response to DNA damage. In the present study, we evaluated the role of ATR in modulating the response of cells to S phase-associated DNA double-stranded breaks induced by topoisomerase poisons. Prolonged exposure to low doses of the topoisomerase I poison topotecan (TPT) resulted in S phase slowing because of diminished DNA synthesis at late-firing replicons. In contrast, brief TPT exposure, as well as prolonged exposure to the topoisomerase II poison etoposide, resulted in subsequent G(2) arrest. These responses were associated with phosphorylation of the checkpoint kinase Chk1. The cell cycle responses and phosphorylation of Chk1 were markedly diminished by forced overexpression of a dominant negative, kinase-inactive allele of ATR. In contrast, deficiency of the related kinase ATM had no effect on these events. The loss of ATR-dependent checkpoint function sensitized GM847 human fibroblasts to the cytotoxic effects of the topoisomerase I poisons TPT and 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin, as assessed by inhibition of colony formation, increased trypan blue uptake, and development of apoptotic morphological changes. Expression of kdATR also sensitized GM847 cells to the cytotoxic effects of prolonged low dose etoposide and doxorubicin, albeit to a smaller extent. Collectively, these results not only suggest that ATR is important in responding to the replication-associated DNA damage from topoisomerase poisons, but also support the view that ATM and ATR have unique roles in activating the downstream kinases that participate in cell cycle checkpoints.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Top3 processes recombination intermediates and modulates checkpoint activity after DNA damage.

Mutation of TOP3 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae causes poor growth, hyperrecombination, and a failure to fully activate DNA damage checkpoints in S phase. Here, we report that overexpression of a dominant-negative allele of TOP3, TOP3(Y356F), which lacks the catalytic (decatenation) activity of Top3, causes impaired S-phase progression and the persistence of abnormal DNA structures (X-shaped DNA molecules) after exposure to methylmethanesulfonate. The impaired S-phase progression is due to a persistent checkpoint-mediated cell cycle delay and can be overridden by addition of caffeine. Hence, the catalytic activity of Top3 is not required for DNA damage checkpoint activation, but it is required for normal S-phase progression after DNA damage. We also present evidence that the checkpoint-mediated cell cycle delay and persistence of X-shaped DNA molecules resulting from overexpression of TOP3(Y356F) are downstream of Rad51 function. We propose that Top3 functions in S phase to both process homologous recombination intermediates and modulate checkpoint activity.

Alleles↗
PubMed2004

Boromycin abrogates bleomycin-induced G2 checkpoint.

The DNA-damaging agent bleomycin arrests the cell cycle at the G2 phase of Jurkat cells defective in the G1 checkpoint, and microtubule-acting colchicine arrests it at the M phase. Boromycin itself, an actinomycete metabolite, showed no effect on the cell cycle status of Jurkat cells at least up to 340 nM. However, the compound (3.4-340 nM) was found to abrogate bleomycin-induced G2 arrest even at 3.4 nM, resulting in a drastic decrease in cells at the G2 phase and increase in cells at the subG1 phase. On the other hand, boromycin did not show any effect on the colchicine-induced M phase arrest in Jurkat cells, nor on the cell cycle status of the bleomycin-treated or -untreated HUVEC, normal cells conserving both G1 and G2 checkpoints. Furthermore, boromycin potentiated anti-tumor activity of bleomycin in scid mice inoculated with Jurkat cells. These data suggest that boromycin disrupts the cell cycle at the G2 checkpoint of cancer cells selectively, leading to sensitization of cancer cells to anti-cancer reagents.

Animals↗
PubMed1993

RAD9-dependent G1 arrest defines a second checkpoint for damaged DNA in the cell cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Exposure of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae to ultraviolet (UV) light, the UV-mimetic chemical 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide (4NQO), or gamma radiation after release from G1 arrest induced by alpha factor results in delayed resumption of the cell cycle. As is the case with G2 arrest following ionizing radiation damage [Weinert, T. A. & Hartwell, L. H. (1988) Science 241, 317-322], the normal execution of DNA damage-induced G1 arrest depends on a functional yeast RAD9 gene. We suggest that the RAD9 gene product may interact with cellular components common to the G1/S and G2/M transition points in the cell cycle of this yeast. These observations define a checkpoint in the eukaryotic cell cycle that may facilitate the repair of lesions that are otherwise processed to lethal and/or mutagenic damage during DNA replication. This checkpoint apparently operates after the mating pheromone-induced G1 arrest point but prior to replicative DNA synthesis, S phase-associated maximal induction of histone H2A mRNA, and bud emergence.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1998

The cytogenetic theory of the pathogenesis of human adult male germ cell tumors. Review article.

Human male germ cell tumors (GCTs) represent a biological paradox because, in order to develop into a pluripotential tumor, a germ cell destined to a path of limited or no proliferation must acquire the potential for unlimited proliferation. In addition, it must acquire the ability to elicit embryonal differentiation patterns without the reciprocal inputs from fertilization and the imprinting-associated genomic changes which are a part of normal embryonal development. Although much speculated about, the genetic mechanisms underlying these properties of male GCTs remain enigmatic. Recent cytogenetic and molecular genetic analyses of these tumors are providing new insights and new testable hypotheses. Based on our recent work, we propose two such hypotheses. One relates to the mechanism of germ cell transformation and germ cell tumor development. We suggest that the invariable 12p amplification noted as early as in carcinoma in situ/intratubular germ cell neoplasia (CIS/ITGCN) lesions leads to deregulated overexpression of cyclin D2, a cell cycle G1/S checkpoint regulator with oncogeneic potential. Such overexpression reinitiates the cell cycle. We visualize this happening during the pachytene stage of meiosis through aberrant recombinational events which lead to 12p amplification. The other hypothesis relates to the origin of primary extragonadal GCTs. By comparing cytogenetic changes in primary mediastinal versus gonadal lesions, we propose that, in contrast to long-standing speculation that primary extra-gonadal tumors arise from embryonally misplaced primordial germ cells, these lesions arise from migration of transformed gonadal germ cells.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Development of cell cycle active drugs for the treatment of gastrointestinal cancers: a new approach to cancer therapy.

The cell cycle represents a series of tightly integrated events that allow the cell to grow and proliferate. An essential part of the cell cycle machinery is the cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs). When activated, the CDKs provide a means for the cell to move from one phase of the cell cycle to the next (G1 to S or G2 to M). The cell cycle serves to protect the cell from genotoxic stress. In the setting of DNA damage, the CDKs are inhibited and the cell undergoes cell-cycle arrest. This provides the cell the opportunity to repair its own damaged DNA before it resumes cell proliferation. If a cell continues to cycle with its damaged DNA intact, the apoptotic machinery is triggered and the cell will undergo apoptosis. In essence, cell cycle arrest at these critical checkpoints represents a survival mechanism, which provides the tumor cell the opportunity to escape the effects of lethal DNA damage induced by chemotherapy. Over the past several years, a series of new targeted agents has been developed that promote apoptosis of DNA damaged tumor cells either during cell cycle arrest or following premature cell cycle checkpoint exit, such that tumor cells re-enter the cell cycle before DNA repair is complete. An understanding of the cell cycle and its relationship to p53 are critical for the successful clinical development of these agents for the treatment of patients with gastrointestinal cancers.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

G2 checkpoint abrogators as anticancer drugs.

Many conventional anticancer treatments kill cells irrespective of whether they are normal or cancerous, so patients suffer from adverse side effects due to the loss of healthy cells. Anticancer insights derived from cell cycle research has given birth to the idea of cell cycle G2 checkpoint abrogation as a cancer cell specific therapy, based on the discovery that many cancer cells have a defective G1 checkpoint resulting in a dependence on the G2 checkpoint during cell replication. Damaged DNA in humans is detected by sensor proteins (such as hHUS1, hRAD1, hRAD9, hRAD17, and hRAD26) that transmit a signal via ATR to CHK1, or by another sensor complex (that may include gammaH2AX, 53BP1, BRCA1, NBS1, hMRE11, and hRAD50), the signal of which is relayed by ATM to CHK2. Most of the damage signals originated by the sensor complexes for the G2 checkpoint are conducted to CDC25C, the activity of which is modulated by 14-3-3. There are also less extensively explored pathways involving p53, p38, PCNA, HDAC, PP2A, PLK1, WEE1, CDC25B, and CDC25A. This review will examine the available inhibitors of CHK1 (Staurosporin, UCN-01, Go6976, SB-218078, ICP-1, and CEP-3891), both CHK1 and CHK2 (TAT-S216A and debromohymenialdisine), CHK2 (CEP-6367), WEE1 (PD0166285), and PP2A (okadaic acid and fostriecin), as well as the unknown checkpoint inhibitors 13-hydroxy-15-ozoapathin and the isogranulatimides. Among these targets, CHK1 seems to be the most suitable target for therapeutic G2 abrogation to date, although an unexplored target such as 14-3-3 or the strategy of targeting multiple proteins at once may be of interest in the future.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Entry into mitosis in vertebrate somatic cells is guarded by a chromosome damage checkpoint that reverses the cell cycle when triggered during early but not late prophase.

When vertebrate somatic cells are selectively irradiated in the nucleus during late prophase (<30 min before nuclear envelope breakdown) they progress normally through mitosis even if they contain broken chromosomes. However, if early prophase nuclei are similarly irradiated, chromosome condensation is reversed and the cells return to interphase. Thus, the G2 checkpoint that prevents entry into mitosis in response to nuclear damage ceases to function in late prophase. If one nucleus in a cell containing two early prophase nuclei is selectively irradiated, both return to interphase, and prophase cells that have been induced to returned to interphase retain a normal cytoplasmic microtubule complex. Thus, damage to an early prophase nucleus is converted into a signal that not only reverses the nuclear events of prophase, but this signal also enters the cytoplasm where it inhibits e.g., centrosome maturation and the formation of asters. Immunofluorescent analyses reveal that the irradiation-induced reversion of prophase is correlated with the dephosphorylation of histone H1, histone H3, and the MPM2 epitopes. Together, these data reveal that a checkpoint control exists in early but not late prophase in vertebrate cells that, when triggered, reverses the cell cycle by apparently downregulating existing cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK1) activity.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

The Schizosaccharomyces pombe spindle checkpoint protein mad2p blocks anaphase and genetically interacts with the anaphase-promoting complex.

The spindle checkpoint monitors mitotic spindle integrity and the attachment of kinetochores to the spindle. Upon sensing a defect the checkpoint blocks cell cycle progression and thereby prevents chromosome missegregation. Previous studies in budding yeast show that the activated spindle checkpoint inhibits the onset of anaphase by an unknown mechanism. One possible target of the spindle checkpoint is anaphase promoting complex (APC), which controls all postmetaphase events that are blocked by spindle checkpoint activation. We have isolated mad2, a spindle checkpoint component in fission yeast, and shown that mad2 overexpression activates the checkpoint and causes a cell cycle arrest at the metaphase-to-anaphase transition. In addition to the observation that mad2-induced arrest can be partially relieved by mitosis-promoting factor inactivation, we present genetic evidence consistent with the hypothesis that the spindle checkpoint imposes a cell cycle arrest by inhibiting APC-dependent proteolysis.

Amino Acid Sequence↗