Exteriorization without colostomy for perforative sigmoid diverticulitis.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Aged↗
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Results for “Colostomy”
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
[The 3rd national workshop on defecography: the functional radiology of (neo) rectal ampullae (ileal reservoir, colo-anal anastomosis, continent perineal colostomy)].
A survey was made in 13 Italian centers with a questionnaire concerning the (a) indications, (b) postoperative complications, (c) functional results and (d) diagnostic imaging modalities related to the making of an ileal or colonic (neo) rectum. Ulcerative colitis (100%), familial polyposis (61.5%) and Crohn's disease (15.3%) were the most common indications for an ileal pouch; rectal cancer (7.96%), chronic inflammatory diseases (15.3%), diverticulosis, rectal prolapse, redundant colon and imperforate anus (7.6% each) were the most common indications for a colonic pouch. Postoperative complications included pelvic abscess (14%), sinus tract/dehiscence (10%) and bowel obstruction (9%). When compared with the S and W variants, the J-shaped ileoanal pouch proved superior because urgency and fecal retention rates were lower (18.4% vs. 44.4% and 23% vs. 28.6%, p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively), despite slightly more frequent staining episodes (15.8% vs. 11.1%; p < 0.05). As for colonic ampullae, fecal retention and provoked evacuation were more frequent in the J pouch and after gracileplasty; urgency and incontinence in the straight colo-anal anastomosis (33.3% vs. 22.2% and 41.6% vs. 33.3%, respectively). The functional outcome was assessed by anal endosonography (available in 4/13 centers), defecography and anorectal manometry. Abnormal findings included: (a) reduced capacity, barium leakage, anal gaping, sphincter damage (urgency and incontinence); (b) barium retention, pouch dilatation, split evacuation, knobs and strictures (fecal retention).
Defecation↗
[Medical topics. Colostomy and stoma].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Humans↗
Hartmann's colectomy and reversal in diverticulitis: a population-level assessment.
PURPOSE: This study was designed to assess the costs and outcomes of colostomy and colostomy reversal in patients with diverticulitis and examine the impact of such procedures on the health care system. METHODS: We employed a retrospective design and used a Washington State administrative database to identify patients undergoing operations with colostomy (1987-2002) who were followed over time. Descriptive and comparative analysis was performed, focusing on patients with diverticulitis. RESULTS: There were 16,556 patients who underwent colostomy and 5,420 (32.7 percent) were for diverticulitis and its related complications (mean age, 64.8 +/- 15.1 years; 53.2 percent female). In patients with diverticulitis, the rate of colostomy reversal was 56.3 percent (80 percent in patients less than 50 years, and 30 percent in patients over 77 years). The in-hospital mortality rate after colostomy reversal was 0.36 percent, and was 2.6 percent in those over 77 years of age. After colostomy reversal a second stoma was used in 3.4 percent, reoperation was required for bleeding complications in 0.6 percent, and infectious complications were noted in 2 percent. The length of time from colostomy to its reversal was approximately five months (138.1 +/- 164 days; interquartile range, 72-156). The relationship between the length of time from colostomy to reversal was evaluated and the adjusted odds of a second stoma being used at the time of colostomy reversal were 45 percent higher (odds ratio, 1.45; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.22, 1.73) for each increase in time interval (<3, 6-9, 9-12, >12 months). CONCLUSIONS: One-third of all colostomies were related to diverticulitis and only 56 percent were reversed. We identified a higher than expected mortality rate among older patients undergoing colostomy reversal. The impact of colostomy and reversal operations on both patients and the health care system is significant.
Adolescent↗
Morbidity and mortality of ostomy closure.
Ostomy closure following the Hartmann procedure is perceived to be associated with higher morbidity and mortality rates than is ostomy closure following divided colostomy, loop colostomy, and divided ileostomy-colostomy so that ostomy closure after Hartmann procedure may be denied to certain patients. To test that perception, the charts of 59 patients undergoing a Hartmann procedure and 43 patients having ostomy closure after divided colostomy, loop colostomy, or divided ileostomy-colostomy were reviewed. Ostomy closure after Hartmann procedure was accomplished in 46 patients. These 46 patients (Group I) were compared with the 43 patients having ostomy closure following divided colostomy, loop colostomy and divided ileostomy-colostomy (Group II). No deaths occurred in either group. The morbidity rate was 30% for Group I and was 19% for Group II. This difference is not significant. Major complications involved wound, lung, small bowel, and colonic anastomoses. Anastomotic stricture rate was 9% for Group I and 5% for Group II. Small bowel and anastomotic complications in both groups occurred only when ostomy closure was performed after a delay of less than 6 months after ostomy construction. Stricture occurred only after end-to-end colocolostomy and coloproctostomy and did not occur after ileocolostomy or ileoproctostomy. All strictures were successfully treated by reoperation. Anastomotic leak and pelvic abscess did not occur in either group. We conclude that ostomy closure after Hartmann procedure may be more difficult and time consuming than is ostomy closure after loop colostomy, divided colostomy, or divided ileostomy-colostomy, but ostomy closure after Hartmann procedure does not have a higher morbidity rate. We advise a delay of 6 months between ostomy construction and ostomy closure and submit that all patients whose general condition permits reoperation may safely undergo ostomy closure.
Adult↗
Whose utilities for decision analysis?
The goal of this study was to examine sources of variation in the utilities assigned to health states. The authors selected a common clinical problem, carcinoma of the rectum, and examined the utilities assigned to colostomy, a common outcome of treatment for that disease. After preparing and validating a description of colostomy and its effects on patients' lives, utilities for the state were obtained from five groups of individuals. These comprised two groups of patients who received treatment for rectal cancer, a group of physicians and surgeons specializing in the treatment of this disease, and two groups of healthy subjects, none of whom were health professionals. Of the patients who had been treated for rectal cancer, one group had been treated surgically with the formation of colostomies and the other had been treated with radiotherapy and none had a colostomy. Utilities for colostomy were elicited using the standard gamble, category rating, and a treatment choice questionnaire. The groups differed substantially in the utilities assigned to colostomy. In general, patients with colostomies and physicians assigned significantly higher utilities than did patients who did not themselves have a colostomy. The clinical significance of these differences was examined in a simplified clinical decision problem that compared surgery (with colostomy) and radiotherapy (without colostomy) as primary treatment. The expected clinical value of these treatment alternatives was substantially influenced by the differences observed in utilities for colostomy. These results emphasize the importance of patient utilities in clinical decision making and the need to gain greater understanding of the factors that influence the utilities that patients assign to health states.
Attitude of Health Personnel↗
Management of penetrating colon and rectal injuries in the pediatric patient.
PURPOSE: Management of civilian penetrating colon injuries in the adult has evolved from the universal use of fecal diversion to the highly selective use of colostomy. We hypothesized that a similar management approach was appropriate for the pediatric population. METHODS: A retrospective review of pediatric patients (age <17 years) with a penetrating colorectal injury was performed at six Level I trauma centers for the period January 1990 through June 2001. RESULTS: For the period of review, 53 children with a penetrating colorectal injury were identified. Firearms caused 89 percent of the injuries. The colon was injured in 83 percent (n = 44) of patients and the rectum in 17 percent (n = 9) of patients. The colorectal injury was managed without colostomy in 62 percent (n = 33) and with colostomy in 38 percent (colon = 11, rectum = 9). All rectal injuries were treated with colostomy. The hospital length of stay was longer in the colostomy group (17.6 days vs. 11.4 days). The complication rate was higher in the colostomy group (55 percent vs. 27 percent), which included two patients with stoma-related complications. There was no mortality in this series. CONCLUSIONS: Primary repair was used safely in most cases of civilian penetrating colon injuries in the pediatric population. All rectal injuries were treated with colostomy in this series. Fecal diversion was used selectively. Colostomy was performed for selected cases of colon wounds associated with shock, multiple blood transfusions, multiple other injuries, extensive contamination, and high-velocity weapons. In the absence of these associated factors, primary repair appears justified.
Adolescent↗
Laparoscopic restoration of intestinal continuity after Hartmann's procedure.
BACKGROUND: Colostomy closure after a Hartmann's procedure typically requires a laparotomy. It also carries the risk of significant morbidity including anastomotic leak, wound infection, and incisional hernia. The aim of this study was to review our experience with laparoscopic restoration of intestinal continuity after Hartmann's procedure. METHODS: After institutional review board approval, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients undergoing laparoscopic colostomy reversal between July 1997 and July 2004. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were identified; all patients had left colon colostomies. A laparoscopic technique was used in 21 patients, and 1 patient underwent hand-assisted colostomy reversal concurrently with right radical nephrectomy. The laparoscopic approach was successful in 20 cases, and there were 2 conversions to open (9%) secondary to dense adhesions around the rectal stump. The mean time to closure of the colostomy was 168 days (range 69-385 days). The mean operative time was 158 minutes (range 84-356 minutes). The estimated blood loss averaged 114 mL (range 30-250 mL). The average length of hospitalization was 4.2 days (range 2-6 days). Bowel function returned on an average of 3.5 days (range 2-5 days). Three patients (14%) developed postoperative wound infections. There were no anastomotic leaks and no mortality. At a mean follow-up of 14.7 months, the only long-term complication has been a small hernia at a colostomy site. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic colostomy reversal after Hartmann's procedure can be performed with low morbidity and a short hospital stay. The need for conversion to open surgery is uncommon despite patients' previous surgeries. A laparoscopic approach to colostomy takedown is safe and feasible and may result in a reduction in complications and length of stay as has been seen with other minimally invasive procedures.
Adult↗
Diversion colitis in patients with myelopathy: clinical, endoscopic, and histopathological findings.
OBJECTIVE: One of the problems with a diverting colostomy, applied in patients with myelopathy for complications of the neuropathic large bowel, is diversion colitis. A clinical, endoscopic, and histological survey was conducted to describe the problem in these patients. METHODS: 19 patients with myelopathy who have had colostomies (68% of those available) participated in the survey. History of rectal discharge and perineal ulceration plus colonoscopic and biopsy observations were recorded. 20 patients with myelopathy who have not had colostomies, with clinically indicated colonoscopic examinations, were compared for skin breakdown and endoscopic appearance. RESULTS: 15 patients who had colostomies (79%) reported rectal discharge, and 9 (47%) sustained perineal ulceration, 2 being recurrent and refractory. None of the 20 patients who had not had colostomies had perineal ulceration (p = 0.04). Colonoscopy revealed mucosal erythema and friability in 18 patients (94%) with a predominance in the rectosigmoid colon. 1 of 20 without colostomy presented with this picture (p < 0.001). Mucosal biopsies of diverted colon revealed chronic inflammation in all patients, severe inflammation in 13 of 19 subjects at < or = 20 cm from the anus, and in 3 of 10 at > 20 cm (p = 0.06). No difference in the severity of inflammation with time, 0 to 2 years versus > 2 to 18 years post colostomy, could be demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: Diversion colitis is a frequent, persistent, and sometimes problematic complication in patients with myelopathy who have also had colostomies.
Adult↗
Surgical treatment of acute diverticulitis by staged procedures.
A retrospective 10-year experience with the traditional three-stage plan (diverting colostomy, resection, colostomy closure) for perforated diverticulitis of the colon in four urban hospitals was reviewed to accurately assess the mortality rate. Only patients who were admitted in a non-elective manner with signs of an acute abdomen or who were already hospitalized with another illness and developed an acute abdomen were considered. Fecal or generalized purulent peritonitis, or pelvic peritonitis with abscess were observed at laparotomy in all instances. Two hundred and eight patients representing 211 episodes met the above stated criteria for inclusion in the study. A transverse colostomy was performed in 203 instances associated with 16 deaths, and 8 sigmoid colostomies were associated with two deaths. The overall mortality after the first stage was 8.5%. A loop colostomy was constructed most frequently and a completely divided colostomy performed in only 31 of 211 (15%) instances. Of 147 instances in which the diseased sigmoid colon was resected, 44 (30%) had the colostomy ablated at the same operation, resulting in only one death (0.7% mortality). Colostomy closure as a separate procedure in 103 instances resulted in 4 deaths (3.9% mortality). The highest mortality rate occurred in patients in the in the eighth decade. Staged procedures for perforated colonic diverticula can be carried out with a mortality rate of 11%.
Abdomen, Acute↗
Proximal fecal diversion: review of ten years' experience.
In a retrospective study, the clinical course of 250 patients subjected to 257 transverse colostomies was reviewed in an effort to evaluate the problems associated with proximal fecal diversion. Morbidity following stomal construction was 28 per cent, with a significant increase when performed in infants or as an emergency. Two-thirds of the colostomies were emergencies, chiefly due to obstruction and free perforation which was associated with a mortality rate of 12 and 48 per cent respectively. In 102 patients undergoing definite colorectal resection with a previous or simultaneous transverse colostomy, the overall morbidity rate was 58 per cent including a leakage rate of 22.5 per cent. Despite a proximal defunctioning colostomy, surgical intervention was required in 12.7 per cent with a fatal outcome due to peritonitis in 3.9 per cent. Colostomy closure was associated with a morbidity rate of 57 per cent, comprising a leakage rate of 10 per cent and a mortality rate of 1.7 per cent. Apart from incurable cancer and deaths prior to closure every third patient kept the transverse colostomy permanently. Advanced age and poor condition of patients not proceeding to a definite treatment, or an underlying benign lesion were the three most determining factors. The present results indicate a too extensive use of transverse colostomy, emphasizing the need for a circumspect initial selection of patients for diversionary procedures.
Adolescent↗
A prospective evaluation of diversion colitis.
Numerous case reports suggest that diversion of the fecal stream results in nonspecific colitis, with abnormalities ranging from minimal friability to gross ulceration. Published reports consist largely of patients with symptomatic colitis, and there are scant data suggesting at what frequency diversion colitis actually occurs. In an attempt to identify the frequency of diversion colitis and any associated etiologic factors, 20 patients scheduled for colostomy closure at Grady Memorial Hospital between 8/1/88 and 6/15/89 underwent colonoscopy, including the excluded segment, to evaluate for diversion colitis. Colostomies were performed for the management of diverticulitis, trauma, cancer, protection of an anastomosis, and diversion of fecal fistula. Patients with ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease were excluded. The colon was classified grossly as normal or colitis (including easy friability, edema, inflammation, and ulceration as colitis). Fourteen of the 20 patients (70%) had findings of diversion colitis (DC), while six had a normal exam (NL). Nine biopsies were performed in the DC group and all revealed microscopic abnormalities. One of the normal patients was also biopsied, revealing mild, nonspecific changes. There was no difference in mean age (DC 49.3, NL 48.2), interval from formation of colostomy (DC 9.21 +/- 7.27 months, NL 2.83 +/- 1.94 months), type of colostomy, or reason for colostomy in the two groups. None of the DC patients had symptoms of colitis (mucous or bloody discharge, tenesmus, or pain), and one of the DC patients manifested symptoms of colitis after colostomy closure. We conclude that diversion colitis is a common subclinical problem in patients with a diverting colostomy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Biopsy↗
The outcome of staged management of complicated diverticular disease of the sigmoid colon.
In a retrospective study, 83 consecutive patients with indication for a staged treatment of complicated diverticular disease were reviewed. There was a considerable overall morbidity rate following construction of the colostomy, colonic resection, and colostomy closure. However, only 58% underwent a resection of the diseased segment, and even fewer (46%) obtained an eventual restoration of the colon continuity. This was primarily due to an unacceptable high mortality rate when patients with general peritonitis were managed by a proximal colostomy and drainage only. Subsequently, advanced age and associated major illness in patients with a planned three-stage management were the most important factors, determining the deficient completion of the staged treatment. Due to the permanence of many transverse colostomies but also to the fact that serious anastomotic complications, including fatal consequences, occurred despite a defunctioning colostomy, one should re-evaluate the need for a proximal colostomy in patients at high risk, considering resection and an end sigmoid colostomy which is the superior permanent stoma if reconstruction fails to come.
Adult↗
Preliminary results of coloanal anastomosis.
Coloanal anastomosis after resection of the rectum is the ultimate procedure to preserve the patient's sphincter and avoid a permanent colostomy. Carcinoma of the midrectum, and sometimes of the lower third of the rectum, may not require excision of the pelvic floor and anus for cure. A colonal anastomosis was achieved in 38 patients in whom the indications for surgery were carcinoma in 29, recurrent or extensive adenomas in four, radiation proctitis in two, rectal fistula following radical cystectomy in one, secondary low Hartmann reconstruction after a failed attempt in one, and stenosis of a very low colorectal anastomosis in one. Twenty-six patients were men and 12 women, with a mean age of 62. Dukes' staging for carcinoma were A: 9, B: 7, C: 11, and two had a palliative resection. The mean distance from the anus was 6.0 cm. All had a temporary defunctioning colostomy. There were no postoperative deaths and 17 (45 percent) had postoperative complications, major in 7 (18 percent), minor in 10 (26 percent). Mean follow-up is now 40 months (range, 12 to 64 months). Among patients who underwent curative resection, three have had pelvic recurrences. Two of these patients died of widespread distant disease and one underwent abdominoperineal resection and is now free of disease. All others are alive with no evidence of disease. The colostomy was closed in all but six (16 percent). Two (palliative) died within the colostomy and the other four are awaiting closure. Anastomotic stricture was the most common long-term problem, occurring in 16 and requiring more than one dilatation in eight. Six months after closing the colostomy, the mean daily number of bowel movements is 3.8. Twenty-six (87 percent) are continent to solid stools, two are incontinent to solid stools, and 16 have to wear a pad to prevent soiling. All but one prefer their present status to having their colostomy. In selected cases of rectal carcinoma with little or no extramural spread, the authors estimate that resection and colonal anastomosis is a good alternative with acceptable function and a low rate of recurrent disease, which is comparable to complete rectal excision but avoids a permanent colostomy. However, it should not be a substitute for standard abdominoperineal resection for extensive lower rectal carcinoma or for a colorectal anastomosis when the latter is technically feasible.
Adult↗
Management of penetrating colon trauma: a cost-utility analysis.
BACKGROUND: Management of penetrating colon injuries in the presence of multiple associated risk factors is controversial. Issues not considered in previous management strategies are patient perception of quality of life with a colostomy and the true cost of each therapeutic option, which includes colostomy supplies and costs of colostomy takedown. To evaluate these issues, we performed a cost-utility analysis. METHODS: We constructed a decision tree with 3 options: primary repair, resection and anastomosis, and colostomy. Chance and decision nodes on each decision branch represent injury severity, complications, colostomy takedown, and death. Chance node frequencies and utility assignments were taken from published data. We obtained actual costs for all components of perioperative care. The outcomes reported are cost and quality of life. RESULTS: Colostomy has the least quality of life and the greatest cost. Primary repair and resection each dominate colostomy in the baseline analysis. No variable significantly altered these conclusions in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Simple suture or resection and anastomosis at the time of initial exploration is the dominant management method for penetrating colon trauma. It also demonstrates the trade-off between cost and life expectancy of the 3 management options.
Colon↗
Transient functional obstruction of the colon in neonates: examination of its development by manometry and biopsies.
Between 1975 and 1983, 17 neonates with transient functional obstruction of the colon were studied in our surgical department. Five could be successfully treated conservatively with enemas. In the remaining 12 cases colostomy was necessary. In three cases colostomy was performed too late and the patients died. In the other nine cases rectal biopsies and anorectal manometries were performed repeatedly. In spite of clear radiological signs of colonic obstruction such as in Hirschsprung's disease in each case, and identical clinical signs, true aganglionosis could be excluded. Rectoanal manometry 4 months after colostomy showed that the situation had normalized in five cases, but was still pathological in four cases, as in aganglionosis. Of the rectal biopsies, five showed signs of immaturity of ganglionic cells and three were normal. Rectoanal manometry 12-24 months later showed normal reaction in all cases, and of the five cases with immaturity of the ganglionic cells at 4 months one was still pathologic at 12-24 months. In eight of 12 cases the colostomy was closed without relapse of the obstruction, even on long-term follow up. Aganglionosis of the ultrashort type was excluded. In cases of severe transient functional obstruction of the colon in neonates, in which colostomy is necessary, rectoanal manometry and rectal biopsies should be performed as early as possible. Rectoanal manometry, at least, should be done before closure of the colostomy to avoid relapse of the obstruction from closing it to early: the functional disturbance may persist for several months. The term "small left colon syndrome" should be abandoned in favor of "transient functional obstruction,", as the latter describes the clinical condition far better.
Biopsy↗
Civilian colon trauma: factors that predict success by primary repair.
BACKGROUND: Primary repair has become the most common method of treatment for civilian injuries of the colon. However, colostomy may still be required in selected patients. AIMS: This study was undertaken to identify factors for the performance of colostomy in patients with colon injuries. METHODS: During a 60-month period, all penetrating injuries to the colon treated at Saint Louis University Hospital were evaluated. All patients underwent an operation within six hours of injury. Rectal injuries were excluded. RESULTS: One hundred thirty consecutive patients with injuries to the colon were identified. Primary repair was performed in 81 patients (62 percent). Fecal diversion was used in 49 patients (38 percent). No deaths occurred related to colon injury. Complications related to colon injury included wound infections in 22 patients (17 percent) and intra-abdominal complications in 16 patients (abscess, 14; fecal fistula, 1). Wound complications were most closely related to whether the skin was closed primarily or left open (22 vs. 8 percent). Intra-abdominal complications occurred in 7 percent of patients in whom the colon injury was closed primarily and in 20 percent of patients in whom a stoma was created (P > 0.05). Patients chosen for colostomy had significantly greater blood loss, more associated injuries, and higher scores on the Abdominal Trauma Index (ATI) and Colon Injury Scale (CIS) and were more likely to have gross contamination (P < 0.05). Stepwise regression analysis of 13 factors revealed that only gross contamination and ATI predicted the occurrence of intra-abdominal complications and that CIS most closely predicted either wound or intra-abdominal complications. Stratification of patients based on an ATI of > or =30 and a CIS of > or =4 revealed no difference in outcome between primary repair and colostomy in either the low-risk or high-risk groups. However, severity of injury was greater in patients treated with colostomy. CONCLUSIONS: Primary repair can be accomplished with low morbidity in the majority of civilians with penetrating injuries to the colon. Colostomy may be required in high-risk patients as defined by an ATI of > or =30 in association with a CIS of > or =4.
Adolescent↗
Sigmoid diverticulitis with perforation and generalized peritonitis.
Sigmoid diverticulitis with perforation and generalized peritonitis is a grave complication of diverticular disease. To compare accurately the results of two operative approaches--proximal colostomy with drainage and proximal colostomy with resection or exteriorization--the authors assessed the clinical and pathologic features of 121 consecutive patients with perforating sigmoid diverticulitis. There were no differences between treatment groups in age, sex, mean duration of symptoms, clinical presentation, number of coexistent diseases, type of peritonitis or chronic corticosteroid use. Overall mortality for emergency operation was 12 percent. Mortality was significantly greater (P less than 0.05) among the 31 patients treated by colostomy and drainage (26 percent) than among the 90 patients treated by colostomy and resection or exteriorization (7 percent). Seven of the nine patients who died from persistent sepsis had undergone colostomy and drainage. Four clinical factors were found to be predictive of mortality (P less than 0.05): persistent postoperative sepsis, fecal peritonitis, preoperative hypotension, and prolonged duration of symptoms. These factors identified a subgroup of patients who, because of an increased risk of death, would be likely to benefit from the more complete eradication of the septic focus that is achieved by colostomy and resection.
Adult↗