Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Cell Cycle Checkpoints”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,675 records · Page 93Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

Rfc5, in cooperation with rad24, controls DNA damage checkpoints throughout the cell cycle in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

RAD24 and RFC5 are required for DNA damage checkpoint control in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Rad24 is structurally related to replication factor C (RFC) subunits and associates with RFC subunits Rfc2, Rfc3, Rfc4, and Rfc5. rad24Delta mutants are defective in all the G(1)-, S-, and G(2)/M-phase DNA damage checkpoints, whereas the rfc5-1 mutant is impaired only in the S-phase DNA damage checkpoint. Both the RFC subunits and Rad24 contain a consensus sequence for nucleoside triphosphate (NTP) binding. To determine whether the NTP-binding motif is important for Rad24 function, we mutated the conserved lysine(115) residue in this motif. The rad24-K115E mutation, which changes lysine to glutamate, confers a complete loss-of-function phenotype, while the rad24-K115R mutation, which changes lysine to arginine, shows no apparent phenotype. Although neither rfc5-1 nor rad24-K115R single mutants are defective in the G(1)- and G(2)/M-phase DNA damage checkpoints, rfc5-1 rad24-K115R double mutants become defective in these checkpoints. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments revealed that Rad24(K115R) fails to interact with the RFC proteins in rfc5-1 mutants. Together, these results indicate that RFC5, like RAD24, functions in all the G(1)-, S- and G(2)/M-phase DNA damage checkpoints and suggest that the interaction of Rad24 with the RFC proteins is essential for DNA damage checkpoint control.

Cell Cycle↗
PubMed2002

MEC3, MEC1, and DDC2 are essential components of a telomere checkpoint pathway required for cell cycle arrest during senescence in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

When telomerase is absent and/or telomeres become critically short, cells undergo a progressive decline in viability termed senescence. The telomere checkpoint model predicts that cells will respond to a damaged or critically short telomere by transiently arresting and activating repair of the telomere. We examined the senescence of telomerase-deficient Saccharomyces cerevisiae at the cellular level to ask if the loss of telomerase activity triggers a checkpoint response. As telomerase-deficient mutants were serially subcultured, cells exhibited a progressive decline in average growth rate and an increase in the number of cells delayed in the G2/M stage of the cell cycle. MEC3, MEC1, and DDC2, genes important for the DNA damage checkpoint response, were required for the cell cycle delay in telomerase-deficient cells. In contrast, TEL1, RAD9, and RAD53, genes also required for the DNA damage checkpoint response, were not required for the G2/M delay in telomerase-deficient cells. We propose that the telomere checkpoint is distinct from the DNA damage checkpoint and requires a specific set of gene products to delay the cell cycle and presumably to activate telomerase and/or other telomere repair activities.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗
PubMed2004

[Cell cycle-targeted therapy].

BACKGROUND: The cell cycle defines sequential molecular processes that ensure orderly cell division. The progression throughout the cell cycle is governed by cyclin-dependent kinases, each of which is enzymatically active solely upon binding to its specific cyclin. The cell cycle harbours two checkpoints, or surveillance posts, which are activated when DNA is damaged. The response to the DNA damage involves a temporary cell cycle arrest, mediated by cell cycle inhibitors or other enzyme proteins, ultimately leading to the outcome of cell survival if the DNA is properly repaired, or cell death. The cell cycle checkpoints may also be biological targets for new therapeutic strategies in cancer intervention. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We compared the effect of ionising radiation on tumour cells with intact or defective functions of the cell cycle checkpoint that governs cell division. RESULTS: The tumour cells responded to radiation-induced DNA damage by cell cycle arrest that required intact checkpoint function. This defence response was overridden upon treatment of the tumour cells with a checkpoint signalling inhibitor. INTERPRETATION: Several pharmacological compounds designed to experimentally target the cell cycle are currently in the pipeline for testing in early-phase clinical trials and may have therapeutic potential as radiosensitizers.

Cell Cycle↗
PubMed2006

Involvement of the ATR- and ATM-dependent checkpoint responses in cell cycle arrest evoked by pierisin-1.

Pierisin-1 identified from the cabbage butterfly, Pieris rapae, is a novel mono-ADP-ribosylating toxin that transfers the ADP-ribose moiety of NAD at N(2) of dG in DNA. Resulting mono-ADP-ribosylated DNA adducts cause mutations and the induction of apoptosis. However, little is known about checkpoint responses elicited in mammalian cells by the formation of such bulky DNA adducts. In the present study, it was shown that DNA polymerases were blocked at the specific site of mono-ADP-ribosylated dG, which might lead to the replication stress. Pierisin-1 treatment of HeLa cells was found to induce an intra-S-phase arrest through both ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) and Rad3-related (ATR) and ATM pathways, and ATR pathway also contributes to a G(2)-M-phase delay. In the colony survival assays, Rad17(-/-) DT40 cells showed greater sensitivity to pierisin-1-induced cytotoxicity than wild-type and ATM(-/-) DT40 cells, possibly due to defects of checkpoint responses, such as the Chk1 activation. Furthermore, apoptotic 50-kb DNA fragmentation was observed in the HeLa cells, which was well correlated with occurrence of phosphorylation of Chk2. These results thus suggest that pierisin-1 treatment primarily activates ATR pathway and eventually activates ATM pathway as a result of the induction of apoptosis. From these findings, it is suggested that mono-ADP-ribosylation of DNA causes a specific type of fork blockage that induces checkpoint activation and signaling.

ADP Ribose Transferases↗
PubMed2003

Differential contribution of inhibitory phosphorylation of CDC2 and CDK2 for unperturbed cell cycle control and DNA integrity checkpoints.

Inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) by Thr14/Tyr15 phosphorylation is critical for normal cell cycle progression and is a converging event for several cell cycle checkpoints. In this study, we compared the relative contribution of inhibitory phosphorylation for cyclin A/B1-CDC2 and cyclin A/E-CDK2 complexes. We found that inhibitory phosphorylation plays a major role in the regulation of CDC2 but only a minor role for CDK2 during the unperturbed cell cycle of HeLa cells. The relative importance of inhibitory phosphorylation of CDC2 and CDK2 may reflect their distinct cellular functions. Despite this, expression of nonphosphorylation mutants of both CDC2 and CDK2 triggered unscheduled histone H3 phosphorylation early in the cell cycle and was cytotoxic. DNA damage by a radiomimetic drug or replication block by hydroxyurea stimulated a buildup of cyclin B1 but was accompanied by an increase of inhibitory phosphorylation of CDC2. After DNA damage and replication block, all cyclin-CDK pairs that control S phase and mitosis were to different degrees inhibited by phosphorylation. Ectopic expression of nonphosphorylated CDC2 stimulated DNA replication, histone H3 phosphorylation, and cell division even after DNA damage. Similarly, a nonphosphorylation mutant of CDK2, but not CDK4, disrupted the G2 DNA damage checkpoint. Finally, CDC25A, CDC25B, a dominant-negative CHK1, but not CDC25C or a dominant-negative WEE1, stimulated histone H3 phosphorylation after DNA damage. These data suggest differential contributions for the various regulators of Thr14/Tyr15 phosphorylation in normal cell cycle and during the DNA damage checkpoint.

Bromodeoxyuridine↗
PubMed1999

Proliferative behavior of the murine cerebral wall in tissue culture: cell cycle kinetics and checkpoints.

Cerebral wall from embryonic day 13 mice was cultured in a three-dimensional collagen matrix in defined, serum-free medium. The cerebral wall retained its normal architecture, including the radial glial fiber system, for up to 19 h in culture. The cell cycle was initially blocked at the S/G2/M and the G1/S phase transitions, resulting in a transient synchronization of the proliferative cells. The transient blockades correspond, we suggest, to the G2 checkpoint and G1 restriction point, adaptive mechanisms of normal proliferative cells. The blocks were relieved within a few hours of explantation with restoration of the interkinetic nuclear migration and flow of cells through the cycle phases. The duration of the reestablished cell cycle and those of G1, S, and combined G2-M phases were estimated to be 19.2, 6.3-8.3, 8.8, and 2.0-4.0 h, respectively. The leaving (Q) fraction of the cycle (0.64) was twice the in vivo value. Two-thirds of the Q fraction cells remained in the ventricular epithelium, resulting in a substantially low growth fraction of 0.73 compared with 1.0 in vivo. The embryonic murine cerebral explant, cultured in minimum essential medium, should be favorable for studies of cycle modulatory actions of cell external influences such as growth factors or neurotransmitters.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Restarting the cell cycle when the checkpoint comes to a halt.

The DNA damage checkpoint coordinates a block in cell proliferation with the DNA repair process that follows when lesions are inflicted on the genome. However, we do not know exactly how cell division can recommence following a DNA damage-induced arrest. Recent work from our lab has identified Polo-like kinase-1 and Cdc25B as two essential components of the machinery that sets the cell division process back in motion when the checkpoint response is abrogated. Here, we discuss these novel insights and discuss their possible implications for the treatment of cancer.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Cell cycle control, DNA damage checkpoints and cancer.

DNA damage checkpoints are essential control points in the cell cycle ensuring effective damage repair. The loss of checkpoint functions leads to loss of genomic integrity and allows accumulation of genetic damage in the daughter cells. Checkpoint deficiency is one of the main causes of DNA aberrations in cancer.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Budding yeast DNA damage adaptation mutants exhibit defects in mitotic exit.

In the presence of double strand breaks, DNA damage checkpoint halts cell cycle progression. However, cells ultimately escape the checkpoint arrest and reenter cell cycle in the presence of irreparable DNA damage. cdc5-ad was identified as a mutant that fails to adapt to the cell cycle arrest induced by DNA damage checkpoint. In budding yeast, Cdc5 protein kinase is a component of both MEN and FEAR pathways that are required for mitotic exit. It remains unclear whether the adaptation defect of cdc5-ad mutant cells is related to the function of Cdc5 in mitotic exit. Here we present evidence indicating that cdc5-ad mutant cells exhibit defects in mitotic exit. cdc5-ad mutant cells are sensitive to high dosage of Amn1, a negative regulator of MEN. It also shows synthetic growth defects with mutants in MEN pathway. Moreover, mutants in FEAR pathway exhibit defects in DNA damage adaptation. Thus, we conclude that the compromised mitotic exit pathway contributes to DNA damage adaptation defects in cdc5-ad mutant cells.

Adaptation, Physiological↗
PubMed2003

Cell cycle timing and developmental checkpoints in Caulobacter crescentus.

Development in Caulobacter reflects a level of complexity once thought only to exist in eukaryotic cells. The cell cycle and development are not isolated from each other, but are interdependent processes. Checkpoints are in place to ensure that both cell cycle and developmental processes are completed accurately before the next stage is initiated. The timing of these processes is regulated by signal transduction networks that integrate signals from DNA replication, cell division and development. These signal transduction networks achieve precise timing of the cell cycle and development by regulating temporal gene expression, and protein activity by dynamic spatial localization within the cell and timed proteolysis.

Caulobacter crescentus↗
PubMed2026

Cumulus cells enhance oocyte genomic quality control by promoting DNA damage-induced meiotic arrest.

Cumulus cells are known to maintain oocyte arrest at prophase I through gap junction-mediated cAMP signalling, but their role after meiotic resumption remains unclear. Here, we show that cumulus cells enhance oocyte genomic quality control by sensitizing mouse oocytes to DNA damage-induced meiotic arrest. Time-lapse imaging of SiR-tubulin-labelled spindles revealed that oocytes from cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) matured faster than denuded oocytes (DOs). Upon mild DNA damage induced by low-dose etoposide, COC oocytes arrested at metaphase I, whereas DOs completed maturation despite similar levels of DNA lesions. This arrest required spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) activity, as reversine rescued polar body extrusion and BubR1 and Mad2 were elevated in COCs but not DOs. Disruption of gap junctions or inhibition of mTOR signalling abolished the checkpoint response. Notably, cumulus cells did not enhance oocyte response to minor spindle perturbations. These findings reveal a previously unrecognized role of cumulus cells in mediating DNA damage-induced SAC activation, providing post-GVBD genomic surveillance beyond prophase I arrest.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Changes in regulatory phosphorylation of Cdc25C Ser287 and Wee1 Ser549 during normal cell cycle progression and checkpoint arrests.

Entry into mitosis is catalyzed by cdc2 kinase. Previous work identified the cdc2-activating phosphatase cdc25C and the cdc2-inhibitory kinase wee1 as targets of the incomplete replication-induced kinase Chk1. Further work led to the model that checkpoint kinases block mitotic entry by inhibiting cdc25C through phosphorylation on Ser287 and activating wee1 through phosphorylation on Ser549. However, almost all conclusions underlying this idea were drawn from work using recombinant proteins. Here, we report that in the early Xenopus egg cell cycles, phosphorylation of endogenous cdc25C Ser287 is normally high during interphase and shows no obvious increase after checkpoint activation. By contrast, endogenous wee1 Ser549 phosphorylation is low during interphase and increases after activation of either the DNA damage or replication checkpoints; this is accompanied by a slight increase in wee1 kinase activity. Blocking mitotic entry by adding the catalytic subunit of PKA also results in increased wee1 Ser549 phosphorylation and maintenance of cdc25C Ser287 phosphorylation. These results argue that in response to checkpoint activation, endogenous wee1 is indeed a critical responder that functions by repressing the cdc2-cdc25C positive feedback loop. Surprisingly, endogenous wee1 Ser549 phosphorylation is highest during mitosis just after the peak of cdc2 activity. Treatments that block inactivation of cdc2 result in further increases in wee1 Ser549 phosphorylation, suggesting a previously unsuspected role for wee1 in mitosis.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Measuring cyclin-dependent kinase activity.

The activity of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) lies at the heart of cell cycle and checkpoint control. These complexes have been called the "cell cycle engine," as it is their enzymatic activity that pushes the cells through the cell-division cycle. If this activity is down-regulated, for example in response to DNA damage and the activation of checkpoint signaling, cell cycle progression is arrested until further notice. In the laboratory, the enzymatic activity of the various CDK complexes can be determined by an in vitro kinase activity assay. In this assay, individual CDK complexes are isolated with the use of specific antibodies and subsequently incubated with a protein substrate in the presence of radioactive ATP. After the termination of this reaction, the amount of radioactively labeled substrate, which reflects the extent of kinase activity, can be visualized by running it on a polyacrylamide gel and exposing it to film. Here, I describe the execution of this in vitro kinase activity assay as well as appropriate controls that need to be considered for the proper evaluation of the results.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗
PubMed1995

The Aspergillus nidulans bimE (blocked-in-mitosis) gene encodes multiple cell cycle functions involved in mitotic checkpoint control and mitosis.

The bimE (blocked-in-mitosis) gene appears to function as a negative mitotic regulator because the recessive bimE7 mutation can override certain interphase-arresting treatments and mutations, causing abnormal induction of mitosis. We have further investigated the role of bimE in cell cycle checkpoint control by: (1) coordinately measuring mitotic induction and DNA content of bimE7 mutant cells; and (2) analyzing epistasis relationships between bimE7 and 16 different nim mutations. A combination of cytological and flow cytometric techniques was used to show that bimE7 cells at restrictive temperature (44 degrees C) undergo a normal, although somewhat slower cell cycle prior to mitotic arrest. Most bimE7 cells were fully reversible from restrictive temperature arrest, indicating that they are able to enter mitosis normally, and therefore require bimE function in order to finish mitosis. Furthermore, epistasis studies between bimE7 and mutations in cdc2 pathway components revealed that the induction of mitosis caused by inactivation of bimE requires functional p34cdc2 kinase, and that mitotic induction by bimE7 depends upon several other nim genes whose functions are not yet known. The involvement of bimE in S phase function and mitotic checkpoint control was suggested by three lines of evidence. First, at restrictive temperature the bimE7 mutation slowed the cell cycle by delaying the onset or execution of S phase. Second, at permissive temperature (30 degrees C) the bimE7 mutation conferred enhanced sensitivity to the DNA synthesis inhibitor hydroxyurea. Finally, the checkpoint linking M phase to the completion of S phase was abolished when bimE7 was combined with two nim mutations that cause arrest in G1 or S phase. A model for bimE function based on these findings is presented.

Aspergillus nidulans↗
PubMed2002

Induction of hRAD9 is required for G2/M checkpoint signal transduction in gastric cancer cells.

DNA damage triggers the activation of checkpoints that delay cell cycle progression to allow for DNA repair. Loss of G2 checkpoints provides a growth advantage for tumor cells undergoing aberrant mitosis. However, the precise mechanisms of G2 checkpoints acting in gastric cancer are unknown. Here, we analyzed the G2 checkpoint function in two gastric cancer cells, MKN-28 cells containing a mutant p53 gene and MKN-45 cells which have wild-type p53. Two agents damaging DNA, camptothecin (CPT) or ultraviolet light (UV), were utilized to trigger a G2 phase cell cycle checkpoint response in these tumor cells. Both CPT and UV inhibited the growth of MKN-45 cells, whereas they did not affect the growth of MKN-28 cells. CPT induced cell cycle arrest at the G2/M phase and enhanced the expression of human RAD9 (hRAD9) in MKN-45 cells. In addition, hRAD9 showed perinuclear staining and similar localization with Bcl-2 in MKN-45 cells but not in MKN-28 cells after having applied CPT or UV light. These results suggest that besides p53 activity, the induction of hRAD9 is required for G2/M checkpoint signal transduction in gastric cancer cells.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2006

Chk1 inhibitors for novel cancer treatment.

Chemo- and radiotherapies that target DNA are the mainstay of cancer treatment. In response to DNA damage, cells are arrested in multiple checkpoints in the cell cycle to allow the damaged DNA to be repaired before progressing into mitosis. Normal cells are arrested in the G1 phase mediated by the p53 tumor suppressor, and p53-deficient cancer cells are arrested in the S or G2 phase. Checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk 1) is a serine / threonine protein kinase and a key mediator in the DNA damage-induced checkpoint network. When the G2 or S checkpoint is abrogated by the inhibition of Chk1, p53-deficient cancer cells undergo mitotic catastrophe and eventually apoptosis, whereas normal cells are still arrested in the G1 phase. Thus, Chk1 inhibitors can preferentially potentiate the efficacy of DNA damaging agents in cancer cells, and Chk1 is an attractive therapeutic target for cancer treatment, especially since approximately 50% of all human cancers are p53-deficient. This review discusses the rationale of Chk1 as an anticancer target, the structural basis for designing Chk1 inhibitors, and recently disclosed Chk1 inhibitors.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2006

A pathway regulated by cell cycle inhibitor p27Kip1 and checkpoint inhibitor Smad3 is involved in the induction of T cell tolerance.

Peripheral tolerance is essential for immunological homeostasis. Tolerant T cells are thought to arise after T cell receptor ligation in conditions that are nonpermissive for replication. Here we have investigated the function of the cell cycle inhibitor p27(Kip1) in tolerance induction in vivo using naive T cell receptor-transgenic cells lacking the cyclin-dependent kinase (Cdk)-binding domain of p27(Kip1)(p27delta). Wild-type but not p27delta cells underwent tolerization. Tolerized wild-type cells had impaired Cdk2 and Cdc2 kinase activity and failed to phosphorylate the checkpoint inhibitor Smad3, leading to enhanced expression of the Cdk inhibitor p15. In contrast, p27delta cells proliferated in tolerizing conditions because of Cdk kinase activation and phosphorylation of Smad3, which resulted in no upregulation of p15. Smad3 'knockdown' prevented tolerance induction, whereas expression of a Smad3 mutant resistant to Cdk-mediated phosphorylation recapitulated molecular and functional events of tolerance. Thus, p27(Kip1) is required during induction of tolerance and Smad3 regulates T cell responses 'downstream' of p27(Kip1).

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Inhibitory targeting of checkpoint kinase signaling overrides radiation-induced cell cycle gene regulation: a therapeutic strategy in tumor cell radiosensitization?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The tumor cell defense response to ionizing radiation involves a temporary arrest at the cell cycle G(2) checkpoint, which is activated by a signaling cascade initiated by the ATM kinase response to DNA damage, ultimately leading to the outcome of further cell survival if the DNA is properly repaired. The inhibitory targeting of the checkpoint kinase signaling elicited by ATM may define a biologically based strategy to override the G(2) phase delay that prevents mitotic entry after DNA damage, thereby increasing the probability of mitotic cell death following exposure to ionizing radiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Breast carcinoma cell lines with intact or defective function of the tumor-suppressor protein BRCA1 were exposed to ionizing radiation in the absence or presence of a specific inhibitor (UCN-01) of the checkpoint kinase CHK1, and the response profiles of cell cycle distribution and G(2) phase regulatory factors, as well as the efficiency of clonogenic regrowth, were analyzed. RESULTS: The radiation-induced G(2) phase accumulation was preceded by a transient down-regulation of the G(2) phase-specific polo-like kinase-1 and cyclin B1, which required intact function of both BRCA1 and CHK1. The concomitant treatment with UCN-01 seemed to amplify the cytotoxic effect of ionizing radiation on clonogenic regrowth. CONCLUSION: The effector mechanism of DNA damage on cell cycle gene regulation signals through the checkpoint kinase network. Among molecular cell cycle-targeted drugs currently in pipeline for testing in early phase clinical trials, CHK1 inhibitors may have therapeutic potential as radiosensitizers.

Animals↗