Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Inhalation”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,657 records · Page 92Linked to original sources
PubMed2004

Pressure and inspiratory flow characteristics of dry powder inhalers.

This study compared inspiratory characteristics of the Novolizer and Turbuhaler. Sixty patients with obstructive lung disease (40 asthmatics, 20 patients with COPD) and without DPI experience were enrolled into this investigator initiated, randomized, cross-over study. Collected data of 56 patients were eligible for analysis. Inspiratory pressure and inspiratory flow through both devices were measured in every patient using a double-beam oscilloscope. Peak inspiratory flow (PIF), duration of inspiratory flow > 60 l/min and increase in inspiratory pressure were significantly higher in the Novolizer group. In addition, the inspiratory flow rate 0.1 s after beginning of inhalation was over two-times higher at inhalation through the Novolizer compared to inhalation through the Turbuhaler. The Turbuhaler data, but not the Novolizer data, showed a significant negative correlation between lung function and inspiratory flow. The dynamic resistance of the Turbuhaler was 5.5-times higher than that of the Novolizer. Patients using the Turbuhaler had to invest a significantly higher inspiratory effort compared to the use of the Novolizer in order to achieve the same inspiratory flow (e.g., 60 l/min). Indeed, more than 40% of the patients in the Turbuhaler group failed to reach an inspiratory flow of 60 l/min. Overall, patients inhaling through the Novolizer had a better inhalation performance than those inhaling through the Turbuhaler.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Increase in airway neutrophils after oral but not inhaled corticosteroid therapy in mild asthma.

BACKGROUND: Neutrophils, in addition to eosinophils, are prominent in the airways of patients with severe asthma who are usually on long-term oral and inhaled corticosteroid treatment. We determined whether inhaled or oral corticosteroid therapy can induce airway neutrophilia. METHODS: We performed two separate placebo-controlled studies in which patients with mild asthma were treated with either prednisolone (30mg per day for 7 days; n = 9) or placebo tablets (n = 8), or with either inhaled budesonide (800 microg twice daily for 4 weeks; n = 6) or inhaled placebo (n = 6). Fiberoptic bronchoscopy was performed before treatment and at day 7 of oral treatment, and at day 28 of inhaled therapy. Bronchial sections were immunostained with an antibody to major basic protein for eosinophils, and with an antibody to neutrophil elastase for neutrophils. Induced sputum was obtained in the prednisolone study. RESULTS: Neutrophils in airway submucosa increased after prednisolone from median 76 to 140/mm2 (P = 0.05); this change was higher than that after placebo (P = 0.04). Eosinophils decreased from 24 to 9/mm2 (P = 0.03), but this was not significantly different from placebo. Eosinophils and neutrophils, and levels of IL-8 and myeloperoxidase in induced sputum did not change after prednisolone. There was no change in neutrophil counts after budesonide, but the reduction in eosinophils was greater than placebo (P = 0.05). Budesonide improved bronchial responsiveness, but prednisolone did not. CONCLUSION: Corticosteroid therapy by the oral but not inhaled route can induce neutrophil recruitment into the airways of patients with mild asthma. This could explain the increase in airway neutrophils observed in severe asthmatics treated with oral corticosteroids.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2006

Perfluorooctanoic acid: relationship between repeated inhalation exposures and plasma PFOA concentration in the rat.

A large database exists describing the pharmacokinetic behavior of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) following oral exposure. The objective of this study was to examine the concentration- and time-dependence of the pharmacokinetics of inhaled PFOA in rat plasma to determine equivalent inhalation and oral (from literature values) exposure levels. The study was comprised of two separate experiments: a single 6-h inhalation exposure and repeated inhalation exposures for 3 weeks (6h per day, 5 days per week). In both experiments, male and female rats were exposed nose-only to aerosol atmospheres of either 0, 1, 10, or 25mg/m(3) PFOA. In the single exposure experiment, blood was drawn via the tail vein pre-exposure, four times concurrent to exposure, and six times post-exposure up to 24h. In the repeated exposure experiment, blood was collected immediately before and after exposure 3 days per week. Plasma PFOA concentrations were quantitated by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). Following the single exposures, plasma PFOA concentrations were directly proportional to airborne concentrations in both male and female rats. Elimination of PFOA from the plasma was sex-dependent, with female rats eliminating PFOA much more rapidly than male rats. Following repeated PFOA exposure, there was little daily PFOA carryover observed in plasma samples from female rats, while males demonstrated an accumulative pattern over the 3-week period. Peak post-exposure PFOA plasma concentrations in female rats averaged 1, 2, and 4 microg/mL when exposed to 1, 10, and 25mg/m(3) PFOA, respectively, and returned to baseline levels by the time of the next pre-exposure sample collection. Male rats reached steady state plasma concentrations of 8, 21, and 36 microg/mL (ppm) after 3 weeks of exposure to 1, 10, and 25mg/m(3) PFOA, respectively. These results demonstrate that the pharmacokinetic properties of inhaled PFOA in male and female rats are similar to those observed in male and female rats following oral dosing with PFOA. It is thus possible to use this internal dose metric (plasma PFOA) for route-to-route dose extrapolation, with inhalation exposures of 1, 10, and 25mg/m(3) PFOA corresponding to oral doses of approximately 0.3, 1.0, and 2.0mg/kg in rats.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2006

Inhaled activated protein C attenuates lung injury induced by aerosolized endotoxin in mice.

The serine protease activated protein C (APC) possesses prominent anticoagulant and anti-inflammatory actions. In this study, we investigated the effect of inhaled recombinant human (rh) APC in a murine lung injury model. Animals inhaled 10 mg of Pseudomonas lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in 3 mL normal saline (NS); 30 min prior to LPS, mice were pretreated with inhaled rhAPC (4 mg/3 mL NS; APC+LPS group) or NS (LPS group). A control animal group inhaled vehicle (NS) twice. 24 h later, total cells and cell-types, protein content, and the cytokines tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin (IL)-6, macrophage inflammatory protein-1alpha, and mouse keratinocyte-derived chemokine (a homolog of human IL-8) were estimated in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). Lung pathology given as total histology score (THS), wet/dry lung weight ratios, and lung vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM)-1 expression were additionally assessed. rhAPC inhalation attenuated the aerosolized LPS-induced increases of: total cells, neutrophils and macrophages in BALF, lung tissue VCAM-1 protein levels, and THS. Total protein levels and cytokines in BALF, and wet/dry weight ratios were increased in the LPS group, but rhAPC pretreatment did not significantly alter the LPS-induced responses. In conclusion, in this murine septic model of lung injury, inhaled rhAPC appears to attenuate lung inflammation, without reversing the observed increases in lung permeability and BALF cytokines. This effect may be associated with leukocyte trafficking modifications, related, at least in part, to VCAM-1 reduction.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed1997

Nitric oxide inhalation reduces pulmonary tidal volume during exercise in severe chronic heart failure.

Multiple mechanisms have been proposed to explain the hyperventilation and the limited exercise capacity in congestive heart failure (CHF) including increased intrapulmonary pressures, total pulmonary resistance, and airway abnormalities. We investigated the hypothesis that inhalation of nitric oxide could influence the maximum exercise capacity and excessive ventilatory response to exercise in CHF. Fifteen patients in CHF (mean age 48 +/- 12 years) underwent a control and a nitric oxide inhalation progressive treadmill exercise test with 30 ppm. We determined the maximum oxygen consumptiom (peak VO2), CO2 production (VCO2), minute pulmonary ventilation (VE), respiratory rate, tidal volume (VT), ventilatory equivalent for oxygen (VE/VO2), ventilatory equivalent for carbon dioxide (VE/VCO2), estimated physiologic dead space/tidal volume ratio (VD/VT), VE/VCO2 slope, heart rate, systemic arterial pressure, VE/exercise time slope, and VT/exercise time slope during every incremental exercise. Mean maximum exercise values of heart rate, systolic systemic arterial pressure, diastolic systemic arterial pressure, VD/VT, respiratory rate, peak VO2, VO2/heart rate, VE/CO2, and maximum exercise time were unchanged by inhalation of nitric oxide. There was a strong trend toward reduction of VE/VO2 from 53 +/- 15 to 47 +/- 12 (p = 0.051) and in maximum VE from 58 +/- 21 to 48 +/- 17 L x min(-1) (p = 0.059). Maximum VT decreased from 1639 +/- 556 to 1406 +/- 479 ml (p = 0.04). The VE/VCO2 slope was reduced from 43 +/- 12 to 35 +/- 8 (p = 0.018). Two patients had signs of pulmonary congestion during peak exercise or the recovery period with inhalation of nitric oxide. The VE/exercise time slope and VT/exercise time slope during incremental exercise were reduced by inhalation of nitric oxide, demonstrating a statistically significant minor increase in VE and VT. Inhalation of nitric oxide attenuated the excessive increase in VT response to exercise in CHF. The L-arginine-nitric oxide pathway may be involved in mechanisms contributing to hyperventilation during exercise in CHF.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2002

The effects of inhaled corticosteroids in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review of randomized placebo-controlled trials.

Although inhaled corticosteroids are commonly used to treat patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), their effect on clinical outcomes such as exacerbation and mortality is unknown. This systematic review was conducted to determine whether inhaled corticosteroids improve clinical outcomes for patients with stable COPD. All placebo-controlled randomized trials of inhaled corticosteroids given for at least 6 months for stable COPD were identified by searching MEDLINE (1966-2000), EMBASE (1980-2001), CINAHL (1982-2000), SIGLE (1980-2000), the Cochrane Controlled Trial Registry, and the bibliographies of published studies. We independently extracted data from each of the studies using a specified protocol, and determined the summary risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for exacerbations and deaths. Nine randomized trials (3976 patients with COPD), including four with a systemic steroid run-in phase, were identified. Use of inhaled corticosteroid therapy reduced the rate of exacerbations (RR = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.58 to 0.84), with similar benefits in those who were and were not pretreated with systemic steroids. Inhaled corticosteroid therapy was also associated with increased rates of oropharyngeal candidiasis (RR = 2.1; 95% CI: 1.5 to 3.1), skin bruising (RR = 2.1; 95% CI: 1.6 to 2.8), and lower mean cortisol levels. No effects were seen on all-cause mortality (RR = 0.84; 95% CI: 0.60 to 1.18) in the five trials that measured this outcome. This systematic review demonstrates a beneficial effect of inhaled corticosteroids in reducing rates of COPD exacerbation. Further research is required to define the long-term effects of these medications and the benefit/risk ratio for patients with COPD.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed1998

Randomized, double-blind trial of inhaled nitric oxide in LVAD recipients with pulmonary hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vascular resistance is often elevated in patients with congestive heart failure, and in those undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) insertion, it may precipitate right ventricular failure and hemodynamic collapse. Because the effectiveness of inotropic and vasodilatory agents is limited by systemic effects, right ventricular assist devices are often required. Inhaled nitric oxide (NO) is an effective, specific pulmonary vasodilator that has been used successfully in the management of pulmonary hypertension. METHODS: Eleven of 23 patients undergoing LVAD insertion met criteria for elevated pulmonary vascular resistance on weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass (mean pulmonary artery pressure > 25 mm Hg and LVAD flow rate < 2.5 L x min[-1] x m[-2]) and were randomized to receive either inhaled NO at 20 ppm (n = 6) or nitrogen (n = 5). Patients not manifesting a clinical response after 15 minutes were given the alternative agent. RESULTS: Hemodynamics for the group at randomization were as follows: mean arterial pressure, 72 +/- 6 mm Hg; mean pulmonary artery pressure, 32 +/- 4 mm Hg; and LVAD flow, 2.0 +/- 0.3 L x min(-1) x m(-2). Patients receiving inhaled NO exhibited significant reductions in mean pulmonary artery pressure and increases in LVAD flow, whereas none of the patients receiving nitrogen showed hemodynamic improvement. Further, when the nitrogen group was subsequently given inhaled NO, significant hemodynamic improvements ensued. There were no significant changes in mean arterial pressure in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Inhaled NO induces significant reductions in mean pulmonary artery pressure and increases in LVAD flow in LVAD recipients with elevated pulmonary vascular resistance. We conclude that inhaled NO is a useful intraoperative adjunct in patients undergoing LVAD insertion in whom pulmonary hypertension limits device filling and output.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2002

Salivary cortisol concentrations before and after carbon-dioxide inhalations in children.

BACKGROUND: Considerable research implicates over-activity of the hypothalamic-pituitary adrenal axis in the pathophysiology of adult mood and anxiety disorders. The current study evaluates the association between salivary cortisol concentrations and response to carbon-dioxide inhalation in children and adolescents with anxiety disorders, mood disorders, or no psychiatric illness. The central question was whether response to carbon-dioxide inhalation is associated with levels of hypothalamic-pituitary adrenal axis activation. If confirmed, this would relate hypothalamic-pituitary adrenal axis activation in juveniles, as in adults, and response to a well-studied respiratory procedure. METHODS: Serial salivary cortisol samples were examined in 98 subjects (ages 9-17 years), including 62 subjects with an anxiety and/or mood disorder and 36 nonpsychiatrically ill comparisons. Samples were obtained upon arrival at the laboratory, following a tilt test, then before and immediately after a standard 5% carbon dioxide inhalation procedure. RESULTS: Salivary cortisol levels pre-carbon-dioxide inhalation were significantly higher in patients sensitive to the anxiogenic effects of carbon dioxide (n = 20) than in patients who did not respond to carbon dioxide (n = 42) and in healthy subjects, none of whom were sensitive to carbon dioxide (n = 36); cortisol concentrations in the latter two groups were indistinguishable. Salivary cortisol did not increase during carbon-dioxide inhalation, irrespective of diagnostic group or degree of reactivity to the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The current data resemble data from studies of laboratory-induced panic among adult patients. In both groups, activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary adrenal axis is associated with the response to a standardized stressor. Similarly, as in adults, carbon-dioxide inhalation in juveniles does not produce a significant change in hypothalamic-pituitary adrenal axis activation.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed1996

Dose released and absolute bioavailability of nicotine from a nicotine vapor inhaler.

In an open, randomized, three-way crossover study, 14 healthy smokers used one type of nicotine vapor inhaler intensely for 20 minutes every hour for 11 hours (12 administrations). Two different inhalation techniques were applied, shallow frequent sucking (buccal mode) and deep inhalations (pulmonary mode). The determination of nicotine was performed by capillary gas chromatography after single-step liquid-liquid extraction of the plasma sample. Nicotine was detected by means of a nitrogen-sensitive detector, giving high selectivity and sensitivity. The mean (+/- SD) nicotine dose released from each nicotine vapor inhaler unit was estimated at 4.00 +/- 0.60 mg (buccal mode) and 3.87 +/- 0.75 mg (pulmonary mode), inhaled with approximately 15 L of air. Mean (+/- SD) peak plasma level of the last dosing interval was 32.0 +/- 8.7 ng/ml and 34.2 +/- 8.9 ng/ml for the buccal and the pulmonary technique, respectively, achieved after 0.33 and 0.50 (median) hour, respectively. The mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) absolute bioavailability of nicotine was 51 (95% CI, 40 to 65) and 56 (95% CI, 47 to 67) when the buccal and pulmonary techniques were used, respectively. A significant correlation was found between systemically available dose and average steady-state nicotine plasma concentration. Based on the achievement of similar nicotine plasma levels, it may be concluded that the two modes of inhalation appear to be clinically equivalent.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed1996

Pilot study to assess the effect of inhaled corticosteroids on lung function in patients with cystic fibrosis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of inhaled corticosteroids on lung function in patients with cystic fibrosis. STUDY DESIGN: We report a pilot study of 49 patients with cystic fibrosis and moderate to severe bronchial obstruction (forced expiratory volume in 1 second < or = 55% of the predicted value); 25 patients were given inhaled corticosteroids for 30 days (1500 micrograms of beclomethasone via spacer), and 24 patients had the same standard treatment but no inhaled corticosteroids. RESULTS: Forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, and airway resistance showed significant improvement in both study groups, but thoracic gas volume and the diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide improved significantly only in the group given inhaled corticosteroids. When concomitant medications were taken into account, analysis of variance confirmed a significant effect of inhaled corticosteroids on the improvement of thoracic gas volume. CONCLUSION: Inhaled corticosteroids in combination with standard treatment can contribute to the improvement of lung function in patients with cystic fibrosis and moderate to severe bronchial obstruction. Our preliminary data seem encouraging enough to warrant a multicenter, long-term, blind control study.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Effect of inhaled nitric oxide on the hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstrictor response in anaesthetised calves.

The effect of inhaling nitric oxide in the hypoxic pulmonary vascular response was measured in five calves anaesthetised with a combination of guaiacol, ketamine and xylazine. Alveolar hypoxia was induced by means of the inhalation of a gas mixture with an inspiratory oxygen fraction of 14-18 per cent. This alveolar hypoxia resulted in a pronounced pulmonary hypertension (mean pulmonary artery pressure in hypoxic animals: 30.2 mmHg). Inhalation of 20 and 40 ppm of nitric oxide significantly attenuated the hypoxia induced pulmonary hypertension. The effect ceased once nitric oxide administration was stopped. A concentration of 40 ppm of nitric oxide fully abolished the hypoxia induced pulmonary hypertension (mean pulmonary artery pressure during inhalation of 40 ppm nitric oxide: 22.8 mmHg). Inhalation of nitric oxide had no effect on systemic arterial blood pressure nor on systemic vascular resistance. It was concluded that inhalation of 20 or 40 ppm of nitric oxide prevented a selective pulmonary vasoconstriction during alveolar hypoxia in calves, which may be helpful in the treatment of acute respiratory disorders in calves.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2000

Inhalation exposure to THMs from drinking water in south Taiwan.

Trihalomethanes (THMs) are important disinfection byproducts (DBPs) in drinking water. To understand the magnitude of exposure to THMs for the people in southern Taiwan, models are used to estimate the inhalation exposure associated with drinking water based on raw water quality. Two parts of models are used in this study, one for estimating THM concentration from raw water quality, and one for estimating inhalation exposure to people. Important raw water quality and operational parameters, including TOC, UV254, pH, temperature, chlorine dosage, and water residence time of a major water treatment plant in south Taiwan were collected. An empirical THM formation model was then employed to predict the THM concentration at consumers' dwellings based on the parameters collected. Differences between the predicted results and experimental data were found to be small, indicating that the model is appropriate. The predicted THM concentration distribution was served as input parameters for the exposure models. Three major scenarios associated with probable inhalation exposure of THMs, including shower, pre- and post-cooking activities, and cooking processes, were considered in the exposure models. The model results show that the mean inhalation exposure of THMs for shower, pre- and post-cooking activities, and cooking processes are 26.4, 1.56, 3.29 micrograms/day, respectively. The total inhalation exposure (summation of the three scenarios) was found to be comparable with that for direct ingestion, indicating that inhalation is an important pathway for THM exposure from drinking water.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed2003

Inhaled corticosteroids: past lessons and future issues.

Inhaled corticosteroids play a pivotal role in the treatment of asthma. Inhalation permits effective delivery of the corticosteroid in high concentration to target sites within the lung while minimizing systemic exposure. Consequently, the safety profile of inhaled corticosteroids is markedly better than that of oral corticosteroid therapy. However, although it was first thought that direct delivery might eliminate systemic adverse effects, this has not been confirmed by clinical trials and experience. Inhaled corticosteroids are absorbed from the lungs into the systemic circulation, in which they can acutely decrease growth velocity in children, an effect that fortunately appears to be temporary and might have no effect on final adult height. In sufficient dosages, they also produce bone mineral loss leading to osteoporosis and might increase the risk of cataracts, glaucoma, skin atrophy, and vascular changes that increase the risk of ecchymoses. Effective evaluation of the severity and significance of these complications is challenging because highly sensitive tests do not reliably predict clinically significant events, and short-term observations do not predict long-term consequences. Also, compliance wanes with long-term treatment, and susceptibility to a particular adverse event can vary over time, even in the same individual, because of developmental or hormonal changes. This journal supplement will review what has been learned about the safety of inhaled cortico-steroids during the past decade, discussing some of the questions that remain and considering the characteristics of an "ideal" inhaled corticosteroid: one with high local activity in the lung and minimal or no adverse systemic effects.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed1995

Dose-related decrease in bone density among asthmatic patients treated with inhaled corticosteroids.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled corticosteroids are being prescribed more commonly and in higher doses than previously in the management of asthma. Although these topically active compounds have less potential for systemic impact than oral steroids, biochemical markers suggest that they are not devoid of systemic side effects. We conducted this study to investigate the effect of commonly prescribed doses of inhaled steroids on bone density. METHODS: We studied 36 patients with asthma. Those in group A (n = 18) had been taking inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate or budesonide in a dosage of 800 micrograms or more per day for at least 1 year. Those in group B (n = 18) had used only bronchodilator therapy. Adrenal function was assessed by morning serum cortisol level and by short adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation test. Bone turnover was assessed by measurement of serum osteocalcin, alkaline phosphatase, and urinary pyridinium cross-links. Bone mineral density was measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry with a Hologic QDR-1000 densitometer (Hologic Inc., Waltham, Mass.). RESULTS: Group A, mean age (SD) = 36.6 (8.4) years, had used inhaled corticosteroids at a mean dose of 1323 micrograms/day (range, 800 to 2000 micrograms/day) for a median duration of 24 months. Group B, mean age (SD) = 33.4 (8.1) years, had not been taking any form of steroid. Four patients from group A had suppressed morning serum cortisol; three of these had abnormal adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation test results. All patients in group B had normal baseline adrenal function and an appropriate response to adrenocorticotropic hormone. Mean serum osteocalcin level in group A was significantly lower than that in group B (8.8 vs 14.2 ng/ml, p = 0.0003). Bone density measurements showed parallel changes: in group A the mean Z score (SD) of the femoral neck was -0.78 (1.02), significantly below predicted normal values (p = 0.0025). Mean Z scores of the lumbar spine and of femoral Ward's triangle were not significantly reduced. In group B the mean Z scores of the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and femoral Ward's triangle were all within normal limits. In group A the dose duration of inhaled corticosteroid therapy corrected for body mass index correlated negatively with bone density and adrenal function measurements. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the regular use of conventional doses of inhaled corticosteroids by patients with asthma can suppress adrenal function and decrease bone density in a dose-related fashion.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed1996

Short courses of high-dose inhaled budesonide and serum IgG subclass levels in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of systemic side effects of inhaled budesonide increases at doses exceeding 2000 micrograms/day. OBJECTIVE: This study was carried out to investigate whether high-dose inhaled budesonide affects serum IgG subclass concentrations in healthy adult volunteers. METHODS: Two groups of 10 subjects each inhaled 2.4 mg of budesonide per day in a double-blind, crossover study of morning (8:00 AM and noon, group A) and diurnal (8:00 AM and 8:00 PM, group B) dosing schedules for 4 weeks each, separated by a 2-week washout period. The budesonide was inhaled through a pressurized metered-dose inhaler, mounted on a 750 ml Nebuhaler (ASTRA Pharmaceuticals, Lund, Sweden). The IgG subclass levels were determined at baseline and every 2 weeks until the end of the study period (10 weeks). RESULTS: There were no statistically significant changes in the serum IgG subclass concentrations over the 10-week study period in group A, group B, or groups A and B combined. CONCLUSION: Inhalation of budesonide, 2.4 mg/day, through a large-volume spacer for repeated 1-month periods does not influence serum IgG subclass concentrations in healthy adults, suggesting that budesonide does not cause systemic humoral immunosuppression when given at therapeutic doses.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed1997

Comparison of the antiasthmatic, oropharyngeal, and systemic glucocorticoid effects of budesonide administered through a pressurized aerosol plus spacer or the Turbuhaler dry powder inhaler.

To determine therapeutically and systemically equivalent dosages of budesonide inhaled through the Turbuhaler dry powder inhalation device (Astra Pharma Production AB, Södertälje, Sweden) or pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) plus Nebuhaler spacer (Astra Pharma Production AB), we compared these devices in a randomized, open, parallel-group trial. Adults with moderate to severe asthma inhaled budesonide (0.4, 0.8, 1.6, and 2.4 mg/day), for 2 weeks at each dose level, through the Turbuhaler (n = 30) or pMDI + Nebuhaler (n = 28). Dose-dependent effects were demonstrated on asthma symptoms (p = 0.0001), daily peak expiratory flow (p = 0.02), blood eosinophils (p = 0.0001), urinary cortisol output per day (p = 0.0001), serum cortisol (p = 0.006), serum osteocalcin (p = 0.0001), and the oropharyngeal Candida colony count (p = 0.0007. analysis of covariance). The ratio of the responses to the two inhalation devices approximated 1.0 for each index measured; that is, no significant between-device difference was found (p > or = 0.29). However, the 95% confidence limits for the ratio of their respective systemic effects on osteocalcin production were 0.83 to 1.48. Thus in adults who use inhalation devices efficiently and have optimally controlled asthma, conversions from the pMDI + Nebuhaler to the Turbuhaler may reasonably be made at milligram equivalent doses of budesonide, then down-titrated to minimize possible systemic effects. Because earlier studies have shown that the Turbuhaler can double intrapulmonary drug delivery in comparison with a pMDI without a spacer, a 50% dose reduction may be indicated when converting from a pMDI to the Turbuhaler.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed1997

Protective effect of inhaled lysine acetylsalicylate on allergen-induced early and late asthmatic reactions.

Conflicting results have been reported on the effect of non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs on allergen-induced asthmatic responses. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of inhaled lysine acetylsalicylate (LASA) on the early and late allergen-induced responses. We studied 16 patients with mild, stable asthma who had an early asthmatic response and 10 patients with a dual (early and late) response. Each patient underwent two challenges with a single dose of allergen assessed in a preliminary test, after inhalation of either 720 mg of LASA in 4 ml of saline solution or placebo, according to a randomized, double-blind protocol. Allergen-induced hyperreactivity to methacholine was measured in six patients from each of the early and the dual response groups 2 hours and 24 hours after the challenge, respectively. In the patients with early response, the maximum fall in FEV1 after challenge was 24% +/- 1% after inhalation of placebo and 14% +/- 2% after inhalation of LASA (p < 0.005). No protection was observed in four patients who received the drug orally instead of by inhalation. In the patients with a dual response, the maximum FEV1 decrease during the early response was 27% +/- 2% after placebo and 21% +/- 2% after LASA (p < 0.025). During the late response (between 3 and 8 hours), the maximum decrease in FEV1 was 28% +/- 4% after placebo and 16% +/- 4% after LASA (p < 0.005). In both groups allergen challenge caused a significant reduction in methacholine PD20 after treatment with placebo but not with LASA. Without allergen challenge, LASA had no effect on methacoline reactivity. We conclude that inhaled LASA significantly reduces both the early and the late asthmatic response to allergen challenge and that it prevents the allergen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness that follows these responses.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed1998

Antiresorptive therapy in asthmatic patients receiving high-dose inhaled steroids: a prospective study for 18 months.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled steroid therapy is an effective and well tolerated mode of therapy for asthma. Although systemic side-effects of inhaled steroids are much less common than those found with systemic steroids, the drugs may be absorbed through mucosal surfaces. Inhaled steroids have been reported to disturb normal bone metabolism, and they are associated with a decrease in bone mineral density. OBJECTIVE: We conducted this study to investigate bone density in asthmatic subjects receiving long-term high-dose inhaled steroids and the effects of supplementation with oral calcium with or without etidronate. METHODS: We evaluated thirty-eight Chinese subjects (24 men and 14 premenopausal women; 28 patients and 10 healthy control subjects) in this prospective study. Patients were randomized into three arms: those receiving no supplement, those receiving 1000 mg/day calcium supplement, and those receiving 400 mg/day cyclical sodium etidronate with 1000 mg/day calcium, respectively. The patients and control subjects were matched for age, sex, and dose of inhaled steroids. Bone density at lumbar spine and hip region was measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry with a densitometer at baseline and at 6, 12, and 18 months for the asthmatic groups and at baseline and at 12 and 18 months for the control group. Serum calcium, phosphate, alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin, parathyroid hormone, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, and urinary hydroxyproline/creatine were measured simultaneous to bone density assessments. RESULTS: There were 10 control subjects, 10 asthmatic subjects receiving no supplement, eight asthmatic subjects receiving calcium supplement, and 10 asthmatic subjects receiving calcium and etidronate therapy, respectively. The mean (+/- SEM) dosages of beclomethasone or budesonide for the three groups of asthmatic subjects were 2.2 +/- 0.3, 2.0 +/- 0.2, and 2.0 +/- 0.2 mg/day, respectively. Mean dietary calcium intake of the study subjects was 766 +/- 39 mg/day. At baseline, bone mineral density of the spine in the group receiving no supplement was significantly lower than that found in the control group (p < 0.05). At 18 months, patients receiving no supplement had significantly greater bone loss at the lumbar spine than patients receiving etidronate plus calcium lactate-gluconate (CaLG) or CaLG alone (p < 0.05). The increase in bone mineral density versus baseline observed in patients receiving CaLG with or without etidronate (p < 0.05) probably did not result from increased bone formation because serum osteocalcin levels showed a significant reduction in all three groups of patients (p < 0.05). An increase in mean serum calcium (p < 0.05) was seen in patients receiving CaLG with or without etidronate. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that long-term administration of high-dose inhaled steroid (>1.5 mg/day) induces bone loss that is preventable with calcium supplementation with or without cyclical etidronate. Long-term studies involving more patients should follow to confirm these preliminary findings.

Administration, Inhalation↗