SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Twenty-two cases 23 eyes with obstinate stromal keratitis treated by combination of traditional Chinese and Western medicines are reported in this paper. According to clinical manifestations, they are consistent with the clinical diagnosis of stromal herpes simplex keratitis. Since no specific Western medicine is known to be effective in treating this disorder, it is proposed to apply systemic and topical TCM and, if necessary, add beta-ray irradiation to shorten the clinical course of disease, decrease or prevent recurrence and maintain useful visual acuity, avoiding frequent relapses leading to blindness.
BACKGROUND: Following conventional treatment of in-stent restenosis, clinical restenosis may be as high as 60% in long lesions. Results of the START (Stents and Radiation Therapy) trial indicate that intracoronary beta radiation yields significant reductions in the incidence of recurrent in-stent restenosis as compared with placebo. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a subgroup of the START trial, results in patients with coronary lesions > 15 mm in length (n = 239) were analyzed to assess treatment with a 30 mm, beta radiation source train. Patients received an intracoronary catheter with (90)Strontium/(90)Yttrium (n = 128) or placebo (n = 111). Clinical and angiographic parameters were evaluated at 8 months. Patient demographics and angiographic lesion characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. The mean lesion lengths were comparable in the radiation and placebo groups (21.5 5.2 mm versus 22.1 5.5 mm, respectively; p = 0.3873). A total of 14.1% and 22.5% of patients in the radiation and placebo groups, respectively, received new stents (p = 0.09). At 8 months, radiation therapy yielded significant reductions in major adverse cardiac events (16.4% versus 29.7%; p = 0.014), target vessel revascularization (14.8% versus 28.8%; p = 0.0085) and target lesion revascularization (11.7% versus 27.9%; p = 0.0015). There was no stent thrombosis, and binary restenosis rates were significantly lower in the radiation group compared to placebo. CONCLUSION: Intracoronary beta radiation may prevent early recurrent restenosis in long lesions. Additional study is required to determine if the reduction persists throughout mid- to long-term follow-up.
We report a case of obstructive in-stent restenosis in a diffusely diseased saphenous vein graft complicated by a non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. With tirofiban infusion, the extensively occluded saphenous bypass was reperfused, establishing a TIMI flow 3, and then entirely irradiated with a beta source (32P) without any complication. At 7 months the patient was asymptomatic and the control angiogram did not reveal any restenosis. In conclusion, 32P beta brachytherapy may be extremely effective not only in case of native vessel in-stent restenosis but also in cases of high-risk vein graft in-stent restenosis.
BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to evaluate, on single center prospective data, long-term angiographic and clinical results of intracoronary beta (32P) brachytherapy in "real world" patients with high-risk in-stent restenosis lesions. METHODS: Sixty-nine consecutive patients (77 lesions) with high-risk in-stent restenosis (mean lesion length 30.3 +/- 16.1 mm, pattern III-IV 57.2%, diabetes 33.3%) treated with percutaneous dilation procedures and beta-radiation therapy, underwent 7-month clinical and angiographic follow-up. RESULTS: One patient (1.4%) presented with procedural non-Q wave myocardial infarction. At a mean follow-up of 7 +/- 1.5 months, death was observed in 1 patient (1.4%) and non-Q wave myocardial infarction in 3 (4.3%) (in 2 patients, who prematurely discontinued antiplatelet therapy, caused by late coronary thrombosis). Seven-month binary angiographic restenosis occurred in 20 lesions (25.9%) (in-stent restenosis 11.6%). Target lesion and target vessel revascularization occurred in 20 (28.9%) and 21 (30.4%) patients. At follow-up only 12 (17.3%) patients presented with CCS class III-IV angina. After intracoronary beta brachytherapy angiographic restenosis occurred regardless of the vessel size, lesion length and ostial location. On the contrary a high restenosis rate was documented in obstructive lesions. CONCLUSIONS: As applied in routine clinical practice, radiation therapy is safe and effective in the treatment of high-risk in-stent restenosis. In spite of all that, total occlusion at baseline predicts late angiographic restenosis.
At present, vascular brachytherapy is the only efficient therapy for in-stent restenosis. Nevertheless, edge restenosis often related to geographical miss has been identified as a major limitation of the technique. The non-slippery cutting balloon has the potential to limit vascular barotraumas, which, together with low-dose irradiation at both ends of the radioactive source, are the prerequisite for geographical miss. This prospective study aimed to examine the efficacy of combining cutting balloon angioplasty and brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis. The Radiation in Europe NOvoste (RENO) registry prospectively tracked all patients who had been treated by coronary beta-radiation with the Beta-Cath System (Novoste Corporation, Brussels, Belgium) but were not included in a randomized radiation trial. A subgroup of patients with in-stent restenosis treated by cutting balloon angioplasty and coronary beta-radiation (group 1, n = 166) was prospectively defined, and clinical outcomes of patients at 6 months were compared with those of patients treated by conventional angioplasty and coronary beta-radiation (group 2, n = 712). At 6-month follow-up, there was a significant difference between groups 1 and 2 in target vessel revascularization (10.2% versus 16.6% respectively; p = 0.04) and in the incidence of major adverse clinical events (MACE) including death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization (10.8% versus 19.2%; p = 0.01). This observation was confirmed by a multivariate analysis indicating a lower risk for MACE at 6 months (odds ratio: 0.49; confidence intervals: 0.27 0.88; p = 0.02). Compared to conventional angioplasty, cutting balloon angioplasty prior to coronary beta-radiation with the Beta-Cath System seems to improve the 6-month clinical outcome in patients with in-stent restenosis.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Groups of 94-day-old F344/Crl rats were exposed repeatedly to aerosols of 144CeO2 to reestablish desired lung burdens of 1.9, 9.2, 46, or 230 kBq of 144Ce every 60 days for 1 year (seven exposures). Other 94-day-old rats were exposed once to achieve similar desired initial lung burdens of 144Ce. Older rats were exposed once to achieve desired initial lung burdens of 46 or 230 kBq when 500 days of age, the same age at which rats had the last of the repeated exposures. Control rats were either unexposed, sham-exposed once or repeatedly, or exposed once or repeatedly to stable CeO2. Approximately equal numbers of male and female rats were used. The median survival time and cumulative percentage survival curves were significantly decreased only in male and female rats exposed repeatedly to reestablish a 230-kBq lung burden and among the 94-day-old male rats exposed once to achieve a 230-kBq lung burden of 144Ce. The crude incidences of primary lung cancers (well described by a single Weibull distribution function), time to death with lung tumors, and risk of lung cancer per unit of beta-radiation dose to the lungs were correlated with the cumulative beta-radiation dose rather than the rate at which the dose was accumulated. A linear function, 70 (+/- 7.3) + -0.15 (+/- 0.056) x dose (+/- SD), adequately described the excess numbers of rats with lung cancers over a beta-radiation dose range to the lungs of 6.8 to 250 Gy for two groups of rats with the highest doses to the lungs after a single exposure and for two groups with the highest doses after repeated exposure.
BACKGROUND: Recurrent restenosis following vascular brachytherapy (VBT) has been reported in up to one-third of the patients enrolled in clinical trials. The long-term outcome of repeat percutaneous intervention (PCI) after failed beta-brachytherapy is currently unknown. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 97 consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary reintervention after failed beta-brachytherapy at our institution (80.8% of all brachytherapy failures). Long-term incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE, death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization) was assessed. RESULTS: The procedure was successful in 90 patients (92.8%). A new stent was implanted in 72% of the procedures (sirolimus-eluting stent in 16.5%). After 3 years, survival was 94.3%, survival-free from myocardial infarction was 86.7% and MACE-free survival was 66.1%. No difference was observed in MACE-free survival between patients originally treated with brachytherapy for recurrent in-stent restenosis and patients receiving irradiation for de novo lesions (68.2% de novo group versus 61.2% ISR group; p=0.6 by log rank test). Overall, a second target lesion revascularization was performed in 27 patients (27.8%) after an average of 11.2 11.2 months; 21 patients (21.6%) had restenosis, and 6 (6.2%) developed late total vessel occlusion (related to acute myocardial infarction in 2 cases). CONCLUSION: Repeat PCI is the most common choice after failed brachytherapy. This strategy appears to be a reasonable therapeutic option for this complex iterative pathology.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.