Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “interventions”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 163 records · Page 9Linked to original sources

Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation (COMMIT): summary of design and intervention. COMMIT Research Group.

The Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation (COMMIT) is a multicenter project created to test a comprehensive smoking control intervention. COMMIT was designed to effectively reach cigarette smokers, especially heavy smokers, and to aid them in achieving and maintaining long-term cessation of cigarette smoking. COMMIT was also designed to work through communities, using existing media channels, major organizations, and social institutions capable of influencing smoking behavior in large groups of people. This ongoing trial was begun in 1989 in 11 matched pairs of communities. Each pair consists of one community randomized to intervention conditions and one community randomized to comparison conditions. A comprehensive set of mandated activities is organized around four task forces encompassing health care providers, work sites and organizations, cessation resources and services, and public education. Intervention activities are adapted and implemented in each community through a local community board that provides oversight and management of COMMIT activities. Cessation rates will be assessed in randomly selected cohorts of heavy cigarette smokers, identified at the baseline survey and tracked for 5 years, as estimators of the overall quit rates in both intervention and comparison communities. Various data collection methods will be used to provide intermediate outcome measurement and to evaluate implementation. These methods include cross-sectional community surveys and surveys of health providers, work sites, religious organizations, cessation resource providers, and other systems used to track smoking control activities. The trial will have an impact on more than 200 000 adult smokers.

Adult↗

The intervention research process in occupational safety and health: an overview from the National Occupational Research Agenda Intervention Effectiveness Research team.

The goal of occupational safety and health intervention effectiveness research is to determine whether specific interventions work to prevent work-related injury and illness. But that is not the whole story. It is also important that the development and implementation of the intervention be evaluated. All three phases (development, implementation, and effectiveness) are central to a model of intervention research proposed by the National Occupational Research Agenda Intervention Effectiveness Research team. Areas for future research are also presented.

Data Collection↗

Early workplace intervention for employees with musculoskeletal-related absenteeism: a prospective controlled intervention study.

Sickness absenteeism caused by musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) is a persistent and costly occupational health challenge. In a prospective controlled trial, we compared the effects on sickness absenteeism of a more proactive role for insurance case managers as well as workplace ergonomic interventions with that of traditional case management. Patients with physician-diagnosed MSDs were randomized either to the intervention group or the reference group offered the traditional case management routines. Participants filled out a comprehensive questionnaire at the initiation of the study and after 6 months. In addition, administrative data were collected at 0.6, and 12 months after the initiation of the project. For the entire 12-month period, the total mean number of sick days for the intervention group was 144.9 (SEM 11.8) days/person as compared to 197.9 (14.0) days in the reference group (P < 0.01). Compared with the reference group, employees in the intervention group significantly more often received a complete rehabilitation investigation (84% versus 27%). The time for doing this was reduced by half (59.4 (5.2) days versus 126.8 (19.2), P < .01). The odds ratio for returning to work in the intervention group was 2.5 (95% confidence interval 1.2-5.1) as compared with the reference group. The direct cost savings were USD 1195 per case, yielding a direct benefit-to-cost ratio of 6.8. It is suggested that the management of MSDs should to a greater degree focus on early return to work and building on functional capacity and employee ability. Allowing the case managers a more active role as well as involving an ergonomist in workplace adaptation meetings might also be beneficial.

Absenteeism↗

Interventions for seropositive injectors-research and evaluation: an integrated behavioral intervention with HIV-positive injection drug users to address medical care, adherence, and risk reduction.

BACKGROUND: Behavioral interventions to address the complex medical and HIV risk reduction needs of HIV-seropositive (HIV-positive) injection drug users (IDUs) are urgently needed. We describe the development of Interventions for Seropositive Injectors-Research and Evaluation (INSPIRE), a randomized controlled trial of an integrated intervention for HIV-positive IDUs, and the characteristics of the baseline sample. METHODS: HIV-positive IDUs were recruited from community settings in 4 US cities. After completing a baseline assessment, participants who attended the first session were randomly assigned to (1) a 10-session peer mentoring intervention designed to improve utilization of HIV care, to improve adherence to HIV medications, and to reduce sexual and injection risk or (2) an 8-session videotape control. Periodic follow-up for 12 months is ongoing. RESULTS: A total of 1161 HIV-positive IDUs completed the baseline assessment, and 966 (83%) were randomized. Retention rates are greater than 80% for all follow-up periods. Approximately 79% of baseline participants reported a recent medical visit, 49% were taking highly active antiretroviral therapy, and 19% had an undetectable viral load. Use of injection and noninjection substances was prevalent, and sexual and injection risks were each reported by more than 25% of participants. CONCLUSION: There is a need for an integrated intervention for HIV-positive IDUs, and these data show the acceptability of such an approach.

Educational Status↗

Beginning reading intervention as inoculation or insulin: first-grade reading performance of strong responders to kindergarten intervention.

This study examined the first-grade reading progress of children who participated in an intensive beginning reading intervention in kindergarten. Specifically, the study investigated whether kindergarten intervention could prevent first-grade reading difficulties, or produce an "inoculation" effect, for some children under certain instructional conditions. Participants included children at risk for developing reading difficulties who received a 7-month beginning reading intervention in kindergarten. In October of first grade, 59 children who had achieved criterion levels on measures of phonological awareness and alphabetic knowledge were randomly assigned to one of two types of first-grade reading instruction: (a) code-based classroom instruction and a supplemental maintenance intervention, or (b) only code-based classroom instruction. February posttest measures assessed oral reading fluency, word reading, nonword reading, and comprehension. Between-group analyses indicated that instructional groups did not differ on any posttest measure. The students' absolute levels of achievement were compared to national and local normative samples. These results indicated that between 75% and 100% of students in both conditions attained posttest levels and demonstrated growth comparable to their average-achieving peers. These results support the hypothesis that strong responders to kindergarten intervention can experience an inoculation effect through the middle of first grade with research-validated classroom reading instruction.

Child↗

Tiers of intervention in responsiveness to intervention: prevention outcomes and learning disabilities identification patterns.

Response to Intervention (RTI) models have attracted great attention as an alternative to traditional methods used for identifying students with learning disabilities. A major feature of this approach is the implementation of academic interventions in general education and measuring the student's response to those interventions. A common question that needs to be addressed is the number of stages or tiers of intervention necessary in the Response to Intervention model. This article reviews three studies of RTI that investigate the RTI tiers. Sharon Vaughn and Rollanda O'Connor report on studies using the Standard Protocol approach to RTI. David Tilly reports on using the Problem Solving Model as an RTI model. This article summarizes the results of these three investigations.

Child↗

Theory, evidence and Intervention Mapping to improve behavior nutrition and physical activity interventions.

BACKGROUND: The present paper intends to contribute to the debate on the usefulness and barriers in applying theories in diet and physical activity behavior-change interventions. DISCUSSION: Since behavior theory is a reflection of the compiled evidence of behavior research, theory is the only foothold we have for the development of behavioral nutrition and physical activity interventions. Application of theory should improve the effectiveness of interventions. However, some of the theories we use lack a strong empirical foundation, and the available theories are not always used in the most effective way. Furthermore, many of the commonly-used theories provide at best information on what needs to be changed to promote healthy behavior, but not on how changes can be induced. Finally, many theories explain behavioral intentions or motivation rather well, but are less well-suited to explaining or predicting actual behavior or behavior change.For more effective interventions, behavior change theory needs to be further developed in stronger research designs and such change-theory should especially focus on how to promote action rather than mere motivation. Since voluntary behavior change requires motivation, ability as well as the opportunity to change, further development of behavior change theory should incorporate environmental change strategies. CONCLUSION: Intervention Mapping may help to further improve the application of theories in nutrition and physical activity behavior change.

Journal Article↗

Study of Cardiovascular Risk Intervention by Pharmacists (SCRIP): a randomized trial design of the effect of a community pharmacist intervention program on serum cholesterol risk.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of a program of intervention by pharmacists on lipid risk management in patients at high risk for cardiovascular events. METHODS: Randomized, multicenter (44 sites in Alberta and Saskatchewan) study of community pharmacist intervention versus usual care in 1000 patients. Patients are those at high risk of vascular events (existing atherosclerotic vascular disease, or diabetes with > or = 1 other risk factor). After obtaining consent, the pharmacist calls the Project Office to randomize. Patients allocated to intervention receive a brochure and education about cardiovascular risk factors. Pharmacists also complete a physician contact form, which lists the patient's risk factors, medications, and any recommendations. A point-of-care cholesterol test is performed, the result is discussed with the patient, and it is entered on the contact form. If appropriate, the patient is asked to see his or her primary care physician for further assessment and/or treatment, and the form is faxed to the physician. Patients are followed up at two, four, eight, 12, and 16 weeks. During follow-up visits, pharmacists provide educational reinforcement and check for primary end point occurrence. Patients allocated to usual care receive the brochure only, with minimal follow-up. The primary end point is a composite of measurement of a complete lipid panel by the physician, or addition or modification of lipid-lowering drug therapy. Substudies will evaluate economics (third-party payer and pharmacy manager perspective), patient satisfaction, and quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: SCRIP (Study of Cardiovascular Risk Intervention by Pharmacists) is a unique ongoing trial that is evaluating a community pharmacist intervention designed to optimize cholesterol risk management in patients at high risk for cardiovascular events.

Aged↗

Economic impact of community pharmacist intervention in cholesterol risk management: an evaluation of the study of cardiovascular risk intervention by pharmacists.

The Study of Cardiovascular Risk Intervention by Pharmacists, a randomized, controlled trial in over 50 community pharmacies in Alberta and Saskatchewan, Canada, demonstrated that a pharmacist intervention program improved cholesterol risk management in patients at high risk for cardiovascular disease. In a substudy, costs and consequences were analyzed to describe the economic impact of the program. Two perspectives were taken: a government-funded health care system and a pharmacy manager. Costs were reported in 1999 Canadian dollars. Incremental costs to a government payor and community pharmacy manager were $6.40/patient and $21.76/patient, respectively, during the 4-month follow-up period. The community pharmacy manager had an initial investment of $683.50. The change in Framingham risk function for the intervention group from baseline also was reported. The 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease decreased from 17.3% to 16.4% (p<0.0001) during the 4 months. The intervention program in this study led to a significant reduction in cardiovascular risk in the intervention group during the 4-month follow-up period. The incremental cost to provide the program appeared minimal from both government and pharmacy manager perspectives. It is hoped that these results could support negotiations for reimbursement of clinical pharmacy services with payors.

Aged↗

Comparison of psychosocial outcomes in head and neck cancer patients receiving a coping strategies intervention and control subjects receiving no intervention.

This feasibility study aimed at comparing psychosocial outcomes in head and neck cancer patients receiving the Nucare program with a group of control subjects receiving no intervention. A prospective, nonrandomized study design was used. The Nucare program, a short-term psychoeducational coping strategies intervention, was the test intervention. Control subjects were matched to intervention subjects by cancer stage and time since cancer diagnosis. Outcomes were quality of life and depressive symptoms evaluated at baseline and 3 to 4 months later. One hundred thirty-eight subjects were recruited, and outcome data were available on 101 subjects. At outcome evaluation, compared with their baseline scores, the intervention group had improved physical and social functioning, global quality of life, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and depressive symptoms; the control group showed no changes in quality of life or depressive symptoms. The results suggest that the Nucare program may improve quality of life and reduce depressive symptoms in head and neck cancer patients.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

Promoting physical activity in a low-income multiethnic district: effects of a community intervention study to reduce risk factors for type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease: a community intervention reducing inactivity.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to assess the net effects on risk factors for type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease of a community-based 3-year intervention to increase physical activity. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A pseudo-experimental cohort design was used to compare changes in risk factors from an intervention and a control district with similar socioeconomic status in Oslo, Norway, using a baseline investigation of 2,950 30- to 67-year-old participants and a follow-up investigation of 1,776 (67% of those eligible, 56% women, 18% non-Western immigrants) participants. A set of theory-based activities to promote physical activity were implemented and tailored toward groups with different psychosocial readiness for change. All results reported are net changes (the difference between changes in the intervention and control districts). At both surveys, the nonfasting serum levels of lipids and glucose were adjusted for time since last meal. RESULTS: The increase in physical activity measured by two self-reported questionnaires was 9.5% (P = 0.008) and 8.1% (P = 0.02), respectively. The proportion who increased their body mass was 14.2% lower in the intervention district (P < 0.001), implying a 50% relative reduction compared with the control district, and was lower across subgroups. Beneficial effects were seen for triglyceride levels (0.16 mmol/l [95% CI 0.06-0.25], P = 0.002), cholesterol-to-HDL cholesterol ratio (0.12 [0.03-0.20], P = 0.007), systolic blood pressure (3.6 mmHg [2.2-4.8], P < 0.001), and for men also in glucose levels (0.35 mmol/l [0.03-0.67], P = 0.03). The net proportion who were quitting smoking was 2.9% (0.1-5.7, P = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: Through a theory-driven, low-cost, population-based intervention program, we observed an increase in physical activity levels, reduced weight gain, and beneficial changes in other risk factors for type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

Adult↗

Eptifibatide in peripheral vascular interventions: results of the Integrilin Reduces Inflammation in Peripheral Vascular Interventions (INFLAME) trial.

An acute inflammatory response occurs following percutaneous coronary and peripheral vascular interventions (PVI), partly mediated by platelet activation. Glycoprotein (GP) IIb-IIIa inhibitors might partially attenuate this inflammation rise in the coronary patient, but data in patients undergoing PVI are lacking. In the Integrilin Reduces Inflammation in Peripheral Vascular Interventions trial (INFLAME), we hypothesized that eptifibatide reduces the acute inflammatory responses following PVI. This is a single-center, randomized, open-label study of intravenous eptifibatide (180 micro/kg bolus x 2, 10 minutes apart, then 2 micro/kg/min infusion over 18 hours) and low-dose unfractionated heparin (60 Units per kg, target activated clotting time (ACT) 200-250 sec) [LDH+I group; n = 21] versus high-dose unfractionated heparin alone (100 Units per kg, target ACT 300-400 sec) [HDH group; n = 21] in patients undergoing iliac and infrainguinal interventions. The primary endpoints of the study were markers of inflammation (soluble CD-40L [sCD-40L], high-sensitivity C-reactive protein [hs-CRP] and interleukin-6 [IL-6]), thrombin generation (Fragment 1.2 [F1.2]), and fibrinogen measured at baseline and postrandomization. Markers were assayed at baseline, postdilatation at 30 minutes, 2 hours, 18 hours, 48 hours and 7 days. Mean platelet inhibition with eptifibatide was 98% (range 92-100%) using the Accumetrics Rapid Platelet Function Assay at 10 minutes after final bolus. After adjusting for baseline values, the mean +/- SE difference in sCD-40L (loge scale), hs-CRP and F1.2 between the LDH+I group and the HDH was not significant. Fibrinogen had significantly higher mean levels at 7 days for the LDH+I group (541.19 mg/dL versus 472.26 mg/dL; p-value = 0.024). IL-6 was more detectable in the LDH+I group compared to the HDH following intervention. We conclude that LDH+I combination did not reduce acute inflammatory responses as compared to HDH in patients undergoing peripheral vascular interventions.

Aged↗

Multiple risk factor intervention trial. Risk factor changes and mortality results. Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial Research Group.

The Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial was a randomized primary prevention trial to test the effect of a multifactor intervention program on mortality from coronary heart disease (CHD) in 12,866 high-risk men aged 35 to 57 years. Men were randomly assigned either to a special intervention (SI) program consisting of stepped-care treatment for hypertension, counseling for cigarette smoking, and dietary advice for lowering blood cholesterol levels, or to their usual sources of health care in the community (UC). Over an average follow-up period of seven years, risk factor levels declined in both groups, but to a greater degree for the SI men. Mortality from CHD was 17.9 deaths per 1,000 in the SI group and 19.3 per 1,000 in the UC group, a statistically nonsignificant difference of 7.1% (90% confidence interval, -15% to 25). Total mortality rates were 41.2 per 1,000 (SI) and 40.4 per 1,000 (UC). Three possible explanations for these findings are considered: (1) the overall intervention program, under these circumstances, does not affect CHD mortality; (2) the intervention used does affect CHD mortality, but the benefit was not observed in this trial of seven years' average duration, with lower-than-expected mortality and with considerable risk factor change in the UC group; and (3) measures to reduce cigarette smoking and to lower blood cholesterol levels may have reduced CHD mortality within subgroups of the SI cohort, with a possibly unfavorable response to antihypertensive drug therapy in certain but not all hypertensive subjects. This last possibility was considered most likely, needs further investigation, and lends support to some preventive measures while requiring reassessment of others.

Adult↗

Ethics in interventional cardiology: combining coronary intervention with diagnostic catheterization.

As coronary intervention procedures have become more common, their performance at the time of diagnostic coronary arteriography has become more routine. Combined arteriography and coronary intervention may be slightly less costly and, for some patients, more dangerous than staged intervention. Combined intervention is appropriate in selected patients if they are well informed and it can be done safely; however, a combined strategy should not be applied to all patients.

Cardiac Catheterization↗

Sedation, analgesia and anesthesia for interventional radiological procedures in adults. Part I. Survey of interventional radiological practice in Belgium.

A questionnaire was mailed to 217 interventional radiologists to evaluate current practice in analgesia and sedation in adults. Response rate was 15% (33/217). Diagnostic angiography was performed with local anesthesia in 94% to 99%; for PTA, local thrombolysis or stent placement, light sedation was added in 0.1%. Premedication was given in 43% of diagnostic angiographies and in 68% of therapeutic procedures. Radiologists consulted an anesthesiologist before administration of intravenous sedation, always in 54% of cases, occasionally in 19% and never in 27%. General anesthesia with artificial ventilation was applied in 56% of TIPS, in 70% of aortic stent grafting and in 82% of neuroradiological interventions. Intravenous sedation was applied given in 53% of percutaneous biliary drainage, in 42% of bile duct dilatation or stenting, in 40% of percutaneous nephrostomy and in 72% of ureteral balloon dilatation. Patient monitoring during an interventional procedure was always carried out by an anesthesiologist in 52% of cases. 21% of radiologists never visited the patient before a therapeutic procedure, and 36% never did so after completion of a procedure. This survey showed that high standard practice of sedation and analgesia, with the assistance of anesthesiologists, is underused by interventional radiologists in Belgium.

Adult↗

A randomized trial of the effect of community pharmacist intervention on cholesterol risk management: the Study of Cardiovascular Risk Intervention by Pharmacists (SCRIP).

BACKGROUND: Despite clear evidence for the efficacy of lowering cholesterol levels, there is a deficiency in its real-world application. There is a need to explore alternative strategies to address this important public health problem. This study aimed to determine the effect of a program of community pharmacist intervention on the process of cholesterol risk management in patients at high risk for cardiovascular events. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial conducted in 54 community pharmacies (1998-2000) included patients at high risk for cardiovascular events (with atherosclerotic disease or diabetes mellitus with another risk factor). Patients randomized to pharmacist intervention received education and a brochure on risk factors, point-of-care cholesterol measurement, referral to their physician, and regular follow-up for 16 weeks. Pharmacists faxed a simple form to the primary care physician identifying risk factors and any suggestions. Usual care patients received the same brochure and general advice only, with minimal follow-up. The primary end point was a composite of performance of a fasting cholesterol panel by the physician or addition or increase in dose of cholesterol-lowering medication. RESULTS: The external monitoring committee recommended early study termination owing to benefit. Of the 675 patients enrolled, approximately 40% were women, and the average age was 64 years. The primary end point was reached in 57% of intervention patients vs 31% in usual care (odds ratio, 3.0; 95% confidence interval, 2.2-4.1; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: A community-based intervention program improved the process of cholesterol management in high-risk patients. This program demonstrates the value of community pharmacists working in collaboration with patients and physicians.

Alberta↗

Sample size calculations for intervention trials in primary care randomizing by primary care group: an empirical illustration from one proposed intervention trial.

Because of the central role of the general practice in the delivery of British primary care, intervention trials in primary care often use the practice as the unit of randomization. The creation of primary care groups (PCGs) in April 1999 changed the organization of primary care and the commissioning of secondary care services. PCGs will directly affect the organization and delivery of primary, secondary and social care services. The PCG therefore becomes an appropriate target for organizational and educational interventions. Trials testing these interventions should involve randomization by PCG. This paper discusses the sample size required for a trial in primary care assessing the effect of a falls prevention programme among older people. In this trial PCGs will be randomized. The sample size calculations involve estimating intra-PCG correlation in primary outcome: fractured femur rate for those 65 years and over. No data on fractured femur rate were available at PCG level. PCGs are, however, similar in size and often coterminous with local authorities. Therefore, intra-PCG correlation in fractured femur rate was estimated from the intra-local authority correlation calculated from routine data. Three alternative trial designs are considered. In the first design, PCGs are selected for inclusion in the trial from the total population of England (eight regions). In the second design, PCGs are selected from two regions only. The third design is similar to the second except that PCGs are stratified by region and baseline value of fracture rate. Intracluster correlation is estimated for each of these designs using two methods: an approximation which assumes cluster sizes are equal and an alternative method which takes account of the fact that cluster sizes vary. Estimates of sample size required vary between 26 and 7 PCGs in each intervention group, depending on the trial design and the method used to calculate sample size. Not unexpectedly, stratification by baseline value of the outcome variable decreases the sample size required. In our analyses, geographic restriction of the population to be sampled reduces between-cluster variability in the primary outcome. This leads to an increase in precision. When allowance for variable cluster size is made, the increase in precision is not as great as would be expected with equal cluster sizes. This paper highlights the usefulness of routine data in work of this kind, and establishes one of the essential prerequisites for our proposed trial and other trials using primary outcomes with similar between-PCG variation: a feasible sample size.

Accidental Falls↗

Interventions for deliberately altering blood pressure in acute stroke.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether hypertension should be treated after acute stroke, and some have hypothesised that blood pressure should be increased to improve cerebral perfusion. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to assess the effect of lowering or elevating blood pressure in people with acute stroke, and the effect of different vasoactive drugs on blood pressure in acute stroke. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group trials register, the Ottawa Stroke Trials Registry (1994), Medline (from 1965), Embase (from 1981), ISI, and existing review articles. We contacted researchers in the field and pharmaceutical companies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials of interventions that aimed to alter blood pressure in patients within two weeks of acute ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently applied the inclusion criteria and assessed trial quality. Two reviewers extracted the data. MAIN RESULTS: Three trials involving 133 people were included. The trials tested the following vasodilators: nimodipine (66 people), nicardipine (five people), captopril (three people) and clonidine (two people). Oral calcium channel blockers (nimodipine, nicardipine) reduced systolic blood pressure (weighted mean difference 10.9mmHg, 95% confidence interval 2.0 to 19.7), diastolic blood pressure (weighted mean difference 9.5mmHg, 95% confidence interval 4.0 to 15.1) and heart rate (weighted mean difference 4.7 beats per minute, 95% confidence interval 0.2 to 9.2) at 48 hours. The greatest fall in blood pressure over the first 24 hours was shown in patients given the highest dose of nimodipine. The relationship between change in blood pressure and clinical outcome was not clear. There was not enough information to assess the effect of drugs other than calcium channel blockers. No studies of interventions to raise blood pressure were found. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There is not enough evidence to evaluate the effect of altering blood pressure after acute stroke. Although oral calcium channel blockers appear to reduce blood pressure following acute stroke, the balance of benefit and risk remains unclear.

Blood Pressure↗