Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Statins”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 163 records · Page 9Linked to original sources
PubMed2003

Statin therapy and angiogenesis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Clinical studies suggested that 3-hydroxyl-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor (statin) therapy has an additional cardiovascular protective activity that may function independently of the ability of statins to lower serum cholesterol. This paper reviews the available data on these effects and discusses the potential intracellular mechanisms involved. RECENT FINDINGS: Experimental studies have clearly shown that statins protect against ischaemia-reperfusion injury of the heart, and exert pro-angiogenic effects by stimulating the growth of new blood vessels in ischaemic limbs of normocholesterolemic animals. The mechanisms underlying these serum lipid-independent statin effects are not completely understood, but there is increasing evidence that statins improve endothelial function through molecular mechanisms that mediate an increase in endothelium-derived nitric oxide. Recent research has revealed a link between statins and the serine/threonine protein kinase Akt that regulates multiple angiogenic processes in endothelial cells. In contrast to these data, it has also been reported that higher doses of statins can inhibit endothelial cell migration and angiogenesis. SUMMARY: Statins have biphasic potential either to promote or inhibit angiogenesis. Low statin doses induce a pro-angiogenic effect through Akt activation and increase nitric oxide production, whereas high statin doses may decrease protein prenylation and inhibit cell growth. Notwithstanding, the clinical relevance of these serum lipid-independent effects is not fully understood. Further studies on the actions of statins on endothelial cells may lead to the identification of new pharmacological targets for the control of angiogenesis.

Angiogenesis Modulating Agents↗
PubMed2007

The effect of statin therapy on infection-related mortality in patients with atherosclerotic diseases.

OBJECTIVE: Statins have pleiotropic effects that are independent of their lipid-lowering ability. We have previously shown that prior statin therapy is associated with a decreased risk of severe sepsis in patients admitted with acute bacterial infection. The aim of this study was to determine whether statin therapy is associated with a decreased risk of infection-related mortality. DESIGN: A prospective, observational, population-based study. SETTING: Tertiary university medical center. PATIENTS: Using a computerized database, 11,490 patients with atherosclerotic diseases were identified and followed for up to 3 yrs. Two groups of patients were compared: those receiving statins in the final month before follow-up termination and those who were not. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was infection-related mortality. Of the 11,362 patients included in the final analysis, 5,698 (50.1%) belonged to the statin group. Median follow-up was 19.8 months (interquartile range, 14.3-33.3). The risk of infection-related mortality was significantly lower in the statin compared with the no-statin group (0.9% vs. 4.1%), reflecting a relative risk of 0.22 (95% confidence interval, 0.17-0.28). Stepwise Cox proportional hazard survival analysis including a propensity score for receiving statins revealed that the protective effect of statins adjusted for all known potential confounders remained highly significant (hazard ratio, 0.37; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.52). CONCLUSIONS: Therapy with statins may be associated with a reduced risk of infection-related mortality. This protective effect is independent of all known comorbidities and dissipates when the medication is discontinued. If this finding is supported by prospective controlled trials, statins may play an important role in the primary prevention of infection-related mortality.

Atherosclerosis↗
PubMed2003

The association between statin use and age related maculopathy.

AIMS: To evaluate the association between age related maculopathy (ARM) and statin use. METHODS: A nested case-control study among patients at the Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Birmingham, Alabama, with newly diagnosed ARM (cases) between 1997 to 2001 were selected and age matched to non-ARM controls. RESULTS: 550 incident cases of ARM were identified and matched to 5500 controls. Overall, cases were 70% (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.45) less likely to have received and filled a statin prescription relative to the controls. This association was present among both current and past (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.53 and OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.47, respectively) statin users. When considering use of statin and/or non-statin lipid lowering medications, a significant risk reduction was observed for statin only users (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.45) and combined statin and non-statin users (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.64); there was no significant association for non-statin only users (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.20 to 1.13). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that subjects with ARM were significantly less likely to have filled a statin prescription. Future clinical research initiatives should include a clinical trial to provide direct evidence of the effectiveness of statins in lowering the incidence and progression of ARM.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Statin-induced apoptosis and skeletal myopathy.

Over 100 million prescriptions were filled for statins (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors) in 2004. Statins were originally developed to lower plasma cholesterol in patients with hypercholesterolemia and are the most effective drugs on the market in doing so. Because of the discovered pleiotropic effects of statins, the use has expanded to the treatment of many other conditions, including ventricular arrythmias, idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, cancer, osteoporosis, and diabetes. The elderly population is growing. Therefore, it is estimated that the number of statin users will also increase. Fortunately, the use of statins is relatively safe with few side effects. Myopathy is the most common side effect with symptoms ranging from fatigue, weakness, and pain to symptoms associated with rhabdomyolysis which is a life-threatening condition. The development of statin-induced rhabdomyolysis is rare occurring in approximately 0.1% of patients; however, the occurrence of less severe symptoms is underreported and may be 1-5% or more. Physical exercise appears to increase the likelihood for the development of myopathy in patients taking statins. It is thought that as many as 25% of statin users who exercise may experience muscle fatigue, weakness, aches, and cramping due to statin therapy and potentially dismissed by the patient and physician. The mechanisms causing statin-induced myopathy have not been elucidated; however, research efforts suggest that apoptosis of myofibers may contribute. The mitochondrion is considered a regulatory center of apoptosis, and therefore its role in the induction of apoptosis will be discussed as well as the mechanism of statin-induced apoptosis and myopathy.

Anticholesteremic Agents↗
PubMed2004

Effect of withdrawal of statin on C-reactive protein.

BACKGROUND: C-reactive protein is considered a risk factor for coronary artery disease. In addition to its lipid-lowering properties, statin decreases the level of C-reactive protein. Abrupt cessation of statin therapy during treatment could increase the incidence of cardiac events in patients with atherosclerotic heart disease. The changes of C-reactive protein after withdrawal of statin therapy are still unknown. METHODS: Twenty patients with hyperlipidemia received statin (atorvastatin, 10 mg/day) therapy for 3 months. The levels of lipid profiles and C-reactive protein were assessed before receiving the statin therapy, immediately after 3 months of therapy, and on the 3 consecutive days after withdrawal of statin treatment. RESULTS: After 3 months of statin therapy, the total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-chol), and C-reactive protein were significantly reduced (264.94 +/- 16.23 vs. 183.44 +/- 16.34 mg/dl, 183.17 +/- 34.56 vs. 122.00 +/- 17.66 mg/dl, and 2,309.00 +/- 437.85 vs. 1,257.95 +/- 207.99 ng/ml, respectively). The level of C-reactive protein increased on the second day after withdrawal of statin therapy (2,590.14 +/- 1,045.05 vs. 1,257.95 +/- 207.99 ng/ml); however, the total cholesterol and LDL-chol did not increase during the 3-day period after withdrawal of statin therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The increase in the level of C-reactive protein after withdrawal of statin therapy may be a contributing factor to the increased incidence of cardiac events in patients who have abruptly stopped statin therapy.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

The antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel is not attenuated by statin treatment in stable patients with ischemic heart disease.

Recent studies suggest that cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 metabolized statins attenuate the antiaggregatory effect of clopidogrel. We evaluated how CYP3A4 metabolized statins and non-CYP3A4 metabolized statins influence platelet aggregation when given concomitantly with clopidogrel. Sixty-six stable patients with ischemic heart disease were included in this parallel group study. All patients were on clopidogrel and aspirin. Thirty-three patients received a CYP3A4 metabolized statin (simvastatin or atorvastatin), and 33 were treated with a non-CYP3A4 metabolized statin (pravastatin). The antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel was assessed at inclusion and 21 days after statin discontinuation. Platelet function was evaluated by two methods 1) optical platelet aggregometry after stimulation with 20 and 30 microM ADP, and 2 and 4 mg/l collagen, respectively, 2) a Platelet FunctionAnalyzer-100. The primary effect measure was final platelet aggregation after stimulation with 20 microM ADP. No difference was observed between patients treated with a CYP3A4 metabolized statin and patients receiving a non-CYP3A4 metabolized statin (30% point (7-42) versus 20% point (9-32), p = 0.83). Platelet aggregation was not improved by discontinuation of statins for 21 days. Indeed, we found that statin treatment given concomitantly with clopidogrel resulted in an improved platelet inhibition when compared to clopidogrel given alone. The antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel is not attenuated by concomitant treatment with a CYP3A4 metabolized statin in patients with clinical stable ischemic heart disease.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Statin therapy interacts with cytomegalovirus seropositivity and high C-reactive protein in reducing mortality among patients with angiographically significant coronary disease.

BACKGROUND: Seropositivity to cytomegalovirus (CMV) and elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) may jointly predict increased mortality rates in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Therapy with statins reduces lipid levels but may also have other beneficial (eg, antiinflammatory) effects. This study prospectively evaluated the effect of statins on CMV-and CRP-associated death among patients with significant, angiographically defined CAD. METHODS AND RESULTS: We monitored 2315 patients with angiographically significant CAD (stenosis > or =70%) for an average of 2.4 years (maximum, 5.8 years). Anti-CMV IgG antibody levels and CRP concentrations were measured at baseline, and statin prescription was recorded. As previously reported, mortality rate was higher for CMV seropositivity (+) with high CRP (hazard ratio [HR], 2.0) and lower for statins (HR, 0.50). Compared with CMV(-)/low CRP (mortality rate, 5% with statin versus 4% without statin), the protective effect of statin therapy was markedly greater for CMV(+)/low CRP (mortality rate, 2% versus 7%; HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.16 to 1.3), CMV negative (-)/high CRP (mortality rate, 1% versus 8%; HR, 0.16), and CMV(+)/high CRP (mortality rate, 6% versus 17%; HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.70). After adjustment, interactions were found for statin therapy with CMV(+)/low CRP (P for interaction=0.065), CMV(-)/high CRP (P for interaction=0.051), and CMV(+)/high CRP (P for interaction=0.024). CONCLUSIONS: The survival benefit of statins interacted with CMV seropositivity and high CRP to significantly reduce mortality rates among patients with CAD. This finding supports the hypothesis that statins have beneficial, "lipid-independent," antiinflammatory effects. The mechanism of statin benefit associated with CMV seropositivity remains to be determined.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Relation of inflammation and benefit of statins after percutaneous coronary interventions.

BACKGROUND: Beyond lipid lowering, statins are known to possess antiinflammatory and antithrombotic properties. Recent studies suggested an association between statins and early reduction in death or myocardial infarction (MI) after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). We sought to examine the interrelationship between inflammation, statin use, and PCI outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the year 2000, 1552 consecutive United States residents underwent elective or urgent PCI at the Cleveland Clinic and were prospectively followed for 1 year. Preprocedural serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) levels were routinely measured. Patients who had statins initiated before the procedure (39.6%) had a lower median hsCRP level (0.40 versus 0.50 mg/dL, P=0.012) independent of the baseline cholesterol levels and had less frequent periprocedural MI (defined by CKMB > or =3x upper limit of normal, 5.7% versus 8.1%, P=0.038). At 1 year, statin pretreatment was predictive of survival predominantly among patients within the highest hsCRP quartile (mortality rate with statin pretreatment versus no pretreatment when hsCRP > or =1.11 mg/dL, 5.7% versus 14.8%, P=0.009). Using multivariate analysis, preprocedural hsCRP level remained an independent predictor for 1-year death or MI only in patients without statin therapy (hazard ratio, 1.32/quartile; P=0.001). After adjusting for the propensity of receiving statins, statin pretreatment was an independent predictor for 1-year survival within the highest hsCRP quartile (hazard ratio, 0.44; P=0.039). CONCLUSIONS: Statin therapy before PCI is associated with a marked reduction in mortality among patients with high hsCRP levels. A hsCRP-guided strategy may improve targeting of statin therapy and clinical outcome among patients undergoing PCI.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Prior statin therapy is associated with a decreased rate of severe sepsis.

BACKGROUND: Statins have anti-inflammatory properties that are independent of their lipid-lowering abilities. We hypothesized that statin therapy before the onset of an acute bacterial infection may have a protective effect against severe sepsis. The aim of this study was to determine whether patients treated with statins develop severe sepsis less frequently. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this prospective observational cohort study, consecutive patients admitted with presumed or documented acute bacterial infection were enrolled. The primary outcomes were the rate of severe sepsis and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Of the 361 patients enrolled, 82 (22.7%) were treated with statins before their admission. Both groups had a similar severity of illness on admission. Severe sepsis developed in 19% of patients in the no-statin group and in only 2.4% of the statin group (P<0.001). Statin treatment was associated with a relative risk of developing severe sepsis of 0.13 (95% CI, 0.03 to 0.52) and an absolute risk reduction of 16.6%. The overall ICU admission rate was 10.2% (37/361): 12.2% of the no-statin group required ICU admission, whereas in the statin group only 3.7% were admitted to the ICU (P=0.025), reflecting a relative risk of ICU admission of 0.30 (95% CI, 0.1 to 0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Prior therapy with statins may be associated with a reduced rate of severe sepsis and ICU admission. If supported by prospective controlled trials, statins may have a role in the primary prevention of sepsis.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Statin use and sex-specific stroke outcomes in patients with vascular disease.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although statins reduce the risk of stroke in patients with coronary heart disease, possible differing effects of statins on stroke outcomes based on sex remain uncertain. We investigated the relationships between statin use and sex-specific stroke incidence, severity, and mortality. METHODS: Data from 3 trials of oral glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (first and second Sibrafiban versus aspirin to Yield Maximum Protection from ischemic Heart events postacute cOroNary sYndromes [SYMPHONY] and Blockade of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor to Avoid Vascular Occlusion [BRAVO]) were pooled and stroke outcomes compared among 8191 baseline statin users versus 14,752 nonusers. Time-to-event data were modeled with proportional hazards regression. Stroke severity was assessed retrospectively with the Canadian Neurological Scale (CNS) based on records with scoreable neurological examinations. RESULTS: A total of 217 subjects had strokes (0.95%). Statin users had a lower risk of stroke in unadjusted (hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.92) and risk-adjusted models (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.97). There was no difference in stroke mortality with statin use (P=0.8). CNS scores could be assigned to 106 of the subjects, with no difference in severity among statin users and nonusers (median CNS=10.5 in users versus CNS=9.75 in nonusers; P=0.14). Women had more severe strokes than men (median CNS=10.5 in men versus 9.5 in women; Poisson regression P=0.035). Women had more severe strokes after adjustment for statin use (P=0.03) and the combination of statin use, atrial fibrillation, and age (P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In patients included in these clinical trials of oral glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, statin use is associated with a reduced risk of stroke but not severity or mortality. Women had more severe strokes than men, a difference that was not explained by baseline characteristics or statin use.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Does pretreatment with statins improve clinical outcome after stroke? A pilot case-referent study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In primary and secondary prevention trials, statins have been shown to reduce the risk of stroke. In addition to lipid lowering, statins have a number of antiatherothrombotic and neuroprotective properties. In a preliminary observational study, we explored whether clinical outcome is improved in patients who are on treatment with statins when stroke occurs. METHODS: We conducted a population-based case-referent study of 25- to 74-year-old stroke patients with, for each case of a patient who was on statin treatment at the onset of stroke (n=125), 2 referent patients who were not treated with statins but were matched for age, gender, year of onset, and stroke subtype (n=250). RESULTS: The unadjusted odds ratio for early discharge to home (versus late discharge or death) was 1.41 (95% CI 0.91 to 2.17) when patients on statin treatment were compared with referent stroke patients not on statins. Prognostic factors were, in general, more unfavorable among patients on statins. When this was adjusted for in a logistic regression model, the use of statins was a moderately strong but statistically nonsignificant predictor of discharge to home (multiple-adjusted odds ratio 1.42, 95% CI 0.90 to 2.22). CONCLUSIONS: The statistical power of this case-referent study was such that only large beneficial effects of statins in acute stroke could be confirmed. However, the observed trend, together with experimental observations, is interesting enough to warrant a more detailed analysis of the relationship between statins and stroke outcome.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2006

Statins and osteoporosis: new role for old drugs.

Osteoporosis is the most common bone disease, affecting millions of people worldwide and leading to significant morbidity and high expenditure. Most of the current therapies available for its treatment are limited to the prevention or slowing down of bone loss rather than enhancing bone formation. Recent discovery of statins (HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors) as bone anabolic agents has spurred a great deal of interest among both basic and clinical bone researchers. In-vitro and some animal studies suggest that statins increase the bone mass by enhancing bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2)-mediated osteoblast expression. Although a limited number of case-control studies suggest that statins may have the potential to reduce the risk of fractures by increasing bone formation, other studies have failed to show a benefit in fracture reduction. Randomized, controlled clinical trials are needed to resolve this conflict. One possible reason for the discrepancy in the results of preclinical, as well as clinical, studies is the liver-specific nature of statins. Considering their high liver specificity and low oral bioavailability, distribution of statins to the bone microenvironment in optimum concentration is questionable. To unravel their exact mechanism and confirm beneficial action on bone, statins should reach the bone microenvironment in optimum concentration. Dose optimization and use of novel controlled drug delivery systems may help in increasing the bioavailability and distribution of statins to the bone microenvironment. Discovery of bone-specific statins or their bone-targeted delivery offers great potential in the treatment of osteoporosis. In this review, we have summarized various preclinical and clinical studies of statins and their action on bone. We have also discussed the possible mechanism of action of statins on bone. Finally, the role of drug delivery systems in confirming and assessing the actual potential of statins as anti-osteoporotic agents is highlighted.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Statin initiation following coronary artery bypass grafting: outcome of a hospital discharge protocol.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the outcome of a hospital discharge statin drug therapy initiation protocol following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Our goal was to measure the percentage of patients receiving statin drugs at hospital discharge and at a post-hospital discharge assessment following the implementation of the statin drug therapy initiation protocol. We also evaluated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal attainment (ie, < 100 mg/dL), safety monitoring, and tolerability of the statin drug. DESIGN: Single-center, observational study with a historical control group. SETTING: University-affiliated health system with a comprehensive heart care program that included a 14-bed cardiac surgery ICU. Approximately 400 CABG procedures are performed annually. PATIENTS: Patients who underwent CABG surgery were eligible for inclusion in the study. The exclusion criteria were as follows: contraindications to statin therapy; refusal to take a statin drug; refusal to give informed consent; and age < 18 years. INTERVENTION: A protocol was implemented to recommend treatment with a statin drug at hospital discharge in all post-CABG surgery patients if the presurgical LDL-C level was > 100 mg/dL or the patient was receiving a statin prior to hospital admission. The protocol also included a presurgical assessment of lipoprotein levels and hepatic function. All cardiac surgery staff were educated regarding the specifics of the protocol. RESULTS: A total of 403 patients were included in the study. The historical control group (202 subjects) and the intervention group (201 subjects) were similar with respect to gender, age, and baseline lipoprotein levels. The follow-up assessment interval was approximately 6 months in both groups. Overall, patients were more likely to receive a statin at hospital discharge in the intervention group compared to the control group (relative risk [RR], 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3 to 2.0). Attainment of the goal for LDL-C level was similar between the intervention and control groups in the overall sample. Patients who were not at their LDL-C goal at baseline were more likely to have a follow-up LDL-C level of < 100 mg/dL in the intervention group (RR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.0 to 3.5). The rate of liver function assessment was similar in the control and intervention groups. No patients in either group experienced elevations of alanine aminotransferase levels that were more than three times the upper limit of normal, and no cases of muscle toxicity were noted. CONCLUSION: The initiation of therapy with a statin drug at hospital discharge following CABG surgery was associated with increased utilization rates. The LDL-C goal attainment improved in patients who were not at their goal prior to surgery. However, the persistence of medication use declined within 6 months. Statin therapy initiation was well-tolerated in this cohort of patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

A safety look at currently available statins.

In this mini-review, the evidence for safety and efficacy of currently available statins is discussed. Large-scale, long-term clinical studies have documented an outstanding efficacy and safety profile for statin monotherapy when used at pharmacological doses. Non-life-threatening side effects may occur in up to 15% of patients receiving one statin. Sporadic reports show possible adverse effects of statins on nervous system function including mood alterations. More serious side effects may also occur but at much lower rates. Significant elevations in the activity of serum aminotransferase and creatine kinase alone or in combination with muscle pain in statin-treated patients should be taken seriously; under these conditions, monitoring the statin dose or its discontinuation must be considered. Unlike monotherapy, combination therapy is more problematic. Particularly, combination of the statins with gemfibrozil results in higher rates of drug toxicity. Co-administration of statins with other drugs, especially those which may interfere with the cytochrome P450 system, should be considered carefully. Special attention must be paid to the tolerability of the statins in elderly and transplant patients. The safety of statins in children and adolescents has not yet been well-documented, thus, statin therapy is not routinely recommended in this group of hyperlipidaemic subjects. Future clinical studies and surveillance information will warrant long-term safety of each member of this class of lipid-lowering agents.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Statin-associated memory loss: analysis of 60 case reports and review of the literature.

OBJECTIVE: To review case reports of statin-associated memory loss as well as the available published evidence for and against such a link. METHODS: We searched the MedWatch drug surveillance system of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) from November 1997-February 2002 for reports of statin-associated memory loss. We also reviewed the published literature (using MEDLINE) and prescribing information for these drugs. RESULTS: Of the 60 patients identified who had memory loss associated with statins, 36 received simvastatin, 23 atorvastatin, and 1 pravastatin. About 50% of the patients noted cognitive adverse effects within 2 months of therapy. Fourteen (56%) of 25 patients noted improvement when the statin was discontinued. Memory loss recurred in four patients who were rechallenged with the drug. None of the 60 reported cognitive test results. Two placebo-controlled trials found no benefits for statins on cognition or disability. One randomized controlled trial of simvastatin found no effects on cerebrospinal amyloid levels. In one small, randomized study, patients receiving statins showed a trend toward lower cognitive performance than those receiving placebo. Five observational studies found a lower risk of dementia among patients receiving statins. CONCLUSION: Current literature is conflicting with regard to the effects of statins on memory loss. Experimental studies support links between cholesterol intake and amyloid synthesis; observational studies indicate that patients receiving statins have a reduced risk of dementia. However, available prospective studies show no cognitive or antiamyloid benefits for any statin. In addition, case reports raise the possibility that statins, in rare cases, may be associated with cognitive impairment, though causality is not certain.

Humans↗
PubMed2006

Statin withdrawal: clinical implications and molecular mechanisms.

Retrospective analyses of data from the Platelet Receptor Inhibition in Ischemic Syndrome Management (PRISM), the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 4, and the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) trials revealed that the benefits of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) on acute coronary outcomes are rapidly lost and outcomes worsened if statins are discontinued during a patient's hospitalization for an acute coronary syndrome. Withdrawal of statin therapy in the first 24 hours of hospitalization for non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction increased the hospital morbidity and mortality rate versus continued therapy (11.9% vs 5.7%, p<0.01). Data from the Treating New Targets (TNT) study, however, suggested that short-term discontinuation of statin therapy in patients with stable cardiac conditions may not substantially increase the risk of acute coronary syndromes. In patients with acute coronary syndromes who discontinue statins, the rapid increase in risk of an event may result not only from the lost benefits from the therapy, but also from rebound inhibition of vascular protective substances and activation of vascular deleterious substances. Statins inhibit cholesterol synthesis in vascular cells. By reducing levels of isoprenoid intermediates, statins increase the production of nitric oxide and downregulate angiotensin II AT(1) receptors, endothelin-1, vascular inflammatory adhesion molecules, and inflammatory cytokines. These benefits are rapidly lost and often transiently reversed when statins are acutely discontinued. Acute removal of pleiotropic effects and rebound vascular dysfunction may be more important in an acute coronary event, where inflammation promotes rupture of atherosclerotic plaques and inflammatory and prothrombosis markers are present in high concentration, than in stable chronic vascular disease. In the absence of data from randomized controlled trials, current information suggests that statin therapy should be continued, and possibly boosted, during hospitalization for an acute coronary syndrome. Because statins are discontinued during the early hospitalization of many patients, practitioners must ensure that statins are not omitted, unless contraindicated, from the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Statins for improving renal outcomes: a meta-analysis.

Statins frequently are used to prevent cardiovascular events. Several recent studies suggest that statins also may have renal benefits, although this is controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to assess the effect of statins on change in kidney function and urinary protein excretion. Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, conference proceedings, and the authors' personal files were searched. Published or unpublished randomized, controlled trials or crossover trials of statins that reported assessment of kidney function or proteinuria were included, and studies of individuals with ESRD were excluded. Data were extracted for study design, subject characteristics, type of statin and dose, baseline/change in cholesterol levels, and outcomes (change in measured or estimated GFR [eGFR] and/or urinary protein excretion). Weighted mean differences were calculated for the change in GFR between statin and control groups using a random-effects model. A random-effects model also was used to calculate the standardized mean difference for the change in urinary protein excretion between groups. Twenty-seven eligible studies with 39,704 participants (21 with data for eGFR and 20 for proteinuria or albuminuria) were identified. Overall, the change in the weighted mean differences for eGFR was statistically significant (1.22 ml/min per yr slower in statin recipients; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44 to 2.00). In subgroup analysis, the benefit of statin therapy was statistically significant in studies of participants with cardiovascular disease (0.93 ml/min per yr slower than control subjects; 95% CI 0.10 to 1.76) but was NS for studies of participants with diabetic or hypertensive kidney disease or glomerulonephritis. The standardized mean difference for the reduction in albuminuria or proteinuria as a result of statin therapy was statistically significant (0.58 units of SD greater in statin recipients; 95% CI 0.17 to 0.98). Statin therapy seems to reduce proteinuria modestly and results in a small reduction in the rate of kidney function loss, especially in populations with cardiovascular disease.

Albuminuria↗
PubMed2004

Efficacy and safety of coadministration of ezetimibe and statins in elderly patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of statin (HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor) monotherapy versus ezetimibe 10mg plus statin in older and younger adults with primary hypercholesterolaemia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, balanced parallel-group trials were pooled for analysis. After washout and placebo run-in period, men and women >/=18 years of age (n = 1861) with primary hypercholesterolaemia (plasma low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol [LDL-C] level from >/=3.76 to </=6.48 mmol/L and triglycerides </=3.95 mmol/L) were randomised to either placebo, statin monotherapy (lovastatin or pravastatin 10, 20 or 40 mg, simvastatin or atorvastatin 10, 20, 40 or 80 mg) or ezetimibe plus statin for 12 weeks. For each study, the primary efficacy endpoint was the percentage reduction in LDL-C from baseline to study endpoint. In the present study, age subset analyses on data pooled across these four trials were carried out to determine whether coadministration of ezetimibe and statin was equally efficacious across specific age groupings: age <65 versus >/=65 years; age <75 versus >/=75 years. RESULTS: Across age groupings, coadministration of ezetimibe and statin produced significant incremental reductions in LDL-C compared with statin monotherapy. The beneficial effects of ezetimibe plus statin on LDL-C, triglycerides and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) were overall independent of age groupings. Ezetimibe plus statin therapy was generally well tolerated, with similar incidence of adverse events, serious adverse events and changes in liver function and muscle enzymes in the given age groups compared with statin therapy alone. CONCLUSION: The beneficial effects of ezetimibe coadministered with statins on LDL-C, triglycerides and HDL-C were similar between older and younger hypercholesterolaemic patients, with a favourable safety profile across all patient age groups.

Adult↗