[Rhinomanometry and olfactometry; effect of local and general administration of neurovegetative drugs on their findings].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Adenoidal hypertrophy is the commonest cause of nasal obstruction in the pediatric population. It may cause marked morbidity as regards respiratory physiology, facial growth and middle ear function. Determination of adenoidal presence and size is not easy. Nasal endoscopy and radiology are the most accepted modes of diagnosis and each has its disadvantages. We have used acoustic rhinometry to determine the size of adenoids. Changes in nasal volume and resistance were recorded and an easy formula was devised to determined adenoid size. This technique is easy, non-invasive and reproducible with a 93.5% predictive value.
Inspiratory nasal resistance, symptom score, and influx of inflammatory cells into the nose were evaluated before and after a nasal challenge in 15 patients with grass pollen rhinitis and in six nonallergic control subjects, to study the nasal late-phase reaction and its relationship with nasal cytology. All patients had an immediate positive reaction to specific nasal challenge. In seven allergic subjects we observed a later inspiratory nasal resistance increase, but only two had a significant late symptom score. Inflammatory cells increased by 8 hours in all the patients; the higher the cell influx, the higher the symptom score. Close correlations were found between the inspiratory nasal resistance increase, nasal obstruction at hours 8 and 24, and all cell counts. In control challenges there were no significant increases of symptom score or inspiratory nasal resistance either during the challenge or in the next 24 hours. A weakly significant increase was found only for neutrophil counts at 8 hours. These results indicate that an inflammatory reaction constantly occurs after a specific nasal challenge; its extent is closely related to inspiratory nasal resistance and to the intensity of nasal obstruction. Moreover, our data outline the pivotal role played by eosinophils and basophils in the genesis of an allergic late-phase reaction in the nose.
During the period January 1982 to December 1985 nasal resistance (NR) was measured by computer-assisted 'head-out' plethysmography in 986 patients aged 4-18 years referred to the Airflow Laboratory at the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto. Nasal resistance was found to decline with increasing age, and it was elevated in the presence of mucosal swelling, adenoid enlargement and other significant nasal pathology. Studies of variance on the equipment used indicated that in the assessment of NR results of the head-out volume displacement plethysmographic method of active posterior rhinometry were highly reproducible.
Fluticasone propionate is a new glucocorticosteroid with potent topical activity. In a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study, 423 adult patients with moderate to severe seasonal allergic rhinitis received placebo or fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray at doses of 25, 100, or 400 micrograms twice daily (b.i.d.) for 2 weeks. Efficacy was evaluated by nasal symptom scores, nasal airflow, nasal cytology, and global evaluation. All doses of fluticasone propionate were significantly better than placebo in reducing symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis. Patients receiving the largest dose of fluticasone propionate (400 micrograms b.i.d.) had a slightly greater reduction (not significant) in symptom scores than patients receiving the smallest dose (25 micrograms b.i.d.). Symptom improvement was evident within 3 days of treatment. Nasal airflow improved in the groups treated with fluticasone propionate, 100 and 400 micrograms b.i.d. Examination of nasal cytograms revealed a striking decrease in both eosinophils and basophils in all three groups receiving active treatment compared with placebo. There were few adverse events and no treatment-related abnormalities in laboratory assays or evaluations of hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenocortical axis function. Comparison of treatment groups indicated that fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray was as safe as placebo at the doses studied.
We measured differential pressure and airflow at constant flow through a cylinder which had a variable aperture in its central portion, by means of a Rhinorheograph MPR-1100 in order to obtain a turbulent coefficient "n" experimentally in the equation R = delta P/Vn. Between of 1.0-5.0 cm H2O (not equal to 100-500 Pa) pressure, the coefficient "n" was distributed between 1.01-2.80 with a mean value of 2.02 (+/- 0.36), and resistances calculated from the equation R = delta P/Vn were almost the same value at each differential pressure. We applied this coefficient to 95 adult patients referred to our nasal airflow laboratory in Toronto, and found the equation R = delta P/V2 to be quite suitable for clinical assessment.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Measurements of nasal airways resistance in normal subjects have shown a significant difference between values obtained in the two respiratory phases. Higher overall values are found during expiration in both the unprepared and decongested nose but these differences fail to maintain statistical significance after application of a decongestant. This indicates that the phase of respiration in which measurement is made must be routinely recorded especially when measurement is made without decongestant, and comparisons of data made only with recordings from equivalent parts of the nasal cycle.
The protective effect of sodium cromoglycate (DSCG) on the allergic reaction in the nose was compared with placebo in a double blind crossover study of sixteen patients diagnosed as allergic rhinitis. The drug effect was assessed by both a rhinomanometric method and by symptom scores in all patients. DSCG protected the nasal mucosa against antigen challenge and was significantly better than placebo. There was a correlation betwen the objective and subjective assessments.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.