Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Promotion”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 163 records · Page 9Linked to original sources

Drosophila TFIID binds to a conserved downstream basal promoter element that is present in many TATA-box-deficient promoters.

We describe the identification and characterization of a conserved downstream basal promoter element that is present in a subset of Drosophila TATA-box-deficient (TATA-less) promoters by using purified, epitope-tagged TFIID complex (eTFIID) from embryos of transgenic Drosophila. DNase I footprinting of the binding of eTFIID to TATA-less promoters revealed that the factor protected a region that extended from the initiation site sequence (about +1) to approximately 35 nucleotides downstream of the RNA start site. In contrast, there was no apparent upstream DNase I protection or hypersensitivity induced by eTFIID in the -25 to -30 region at which TATA motifs are typically located. Further studies revealed a conserved sequence motif, (A/G)G(A/T)CGTG, termed the downstream promoter element (DPE), which is located approximately 30 nucleotides downstream of the RNA start site of many TATA-less promoters. DNase I footprinting and in vitro transcription experiments revealed that a DPE in its normal downstream location is necessary for transcription of DPE-containing TATA-less promoters and can compensate for the disruption of an upstream TATA box of a TATA-containing promoter. Moreover, a systematic mutational analysis of DNA sequences that encompass the DPE confirmed the importance of the consensus DPE sequence motif for basal transcription and further supports the postulate that the DPE is a distinct, downstream basal promoter element. These results suggest that the DPE acts in conjunction with the initiation site sequence to provide a binding site for TFIID in the absence of a TATA box to mediate transcription of TATA-less promoters.

Animals↗

What makes an Escherichia coli promoter sigma(S) dependent? Role of the -13/-14 nucleotide promoter positions and region 2.5 of sigma(S).

The sigmaS and sigma70 subunits of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase recognize very similar promoter sequences. Therefore, many promoters can be activated by both holoenzymes in vitro. The same promoters, however, often exhibit distinct sigma factor selectivity in vivo. It has been shown that high salt conditions, reduced negative supercoiling and the formation of complex nucleoprotein structures in a promoter region can contribute to or even generate sigmaS selectivity. Here, we characterize the first positively acting sigmaS-selective feature in the promoter sequence itself. Using the sigmaS-dependent csiD promoter as a model system, we demonstrate that C and T at the -13 and -14 positions, respectively, result in strongest expression. We provide allele-specific suppression data indicating that these nucleotides are contacted by K173 in region 2.5 of sigmaS. In contrast, sigma70, which features a glutamate at the corresponding position (E458), as well as the sigmaS(K173E) variant, exhibit a preference for a G(-13). C(-13) is highly conserved in sigmaS-dependent promoters, and additional data with the osmY promoter demonstrate that the K173/C(-13) interaction is of general importance. In conclusion, our data demonstrate an important role for region 2.5 in sigmaS in transcription initiation. Moreover, we propose a consensus sequence for a sigmaS-selective promoter and discuss its emergence and functional properties from an evolutionary point of view.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Multiple promoter elements required for leukemia inhibitory factor-stimulated M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor promoter activity.

Treatment of neuronal cells with leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) results in increased M(2) muscarinic acetylcholine receptor promoter activity. We demonstrate here that multiple promoter elements mediate LIF stimulation of M(2) gene transcription. We identify a LIF inducible element (LIE) in the M(2) promoter with high homology to a cytokine-inducible ACTG-containing sequence in the vasoactive intestinal peptide promoter. Mutagenesis of both a STAT (signal transducers and activators of transcription) element and the LIE in the M(2) promoter is required to attenuate stimulation of M(2) promoter activity by LIF completely. Mobility shift assays indicate that a LIF-stimulated complex binds to a 70 base pair M(2) promoter fragment. Furthermore, a STAT element within this fragment can bind to LIF-stimulated nuclear STAT1 homodimers in vitro. Mutagenesis experiments show that cytokine-stimulated activation of M(2) promoter activity requires tyrosine residues on glycoprotein 130 (gp130) that are also required for both STAT1 and STAT3 activation. Dominant negative STAT1 or STAT3 can block LIF-stimulated M(2) promoter activity. Real-time RT-PCR analysis indicates that LIF-stimulated induction of M(2) mRNA is partially dependent on protein synthesis. These results show that regulation of M(2) gene transcription in neuronal cells by LIF occurs through a complex novel mechanism that is dependent on LIE, STAT and de novo protein synthesis.

3T3 Cells↗

The Mycobacterium marinum G13 promoter is a strong sigma 70-like promoter that is expressed in Escherichia coli and mycobacteria species.

A Mycobacterium marinum promoter, designated G13, was isolated from a promoter-trap library as a constitutive producer of the mutant green fluorescent protein. Sequence analysis, primer extension analysis, and computer promoter prediction analysis indicate that the G13 promoter is very similar to Escherichia coli consensus sigma 70 promoters. Expression of the green fluorescent protein from the G13 promoter in M. marinum is, however, up to 40 times higher than that seen from the mycobacterial hsp60 promoter during exponential growth. Further, expression from this promoter does not appear to affect the growth of the organism in culture media or in macrophages. The strong expression of the G13 promoter allows it to be developed as a useful molecular tool for high level expression of markers in vitro.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Molecular characterization of promoters of the Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris temperate bacteriophage BK5-T and identification of a phage gene implicated in the regulation of promoter activity.

DNA fragments from the temperate lactococcal bacteriophage BK5-T were cloned into the promoter-detecting plasmid pMU1328. Five DNA fragments conferring promoter activity were selected by transformation of Streptococcus sanguis and were functional in Escherichia coli, S. sanguis, and Lactococcus lactis subspp. lactis and cremoris. The nucleotide sequences of these fragments were determined, and primer extension analysis was used to locate the site of initiation of transcription from each promoter in both E. coli and S. sanguis. Transcription was initiated from the same nucleotide in these two organisms, and the promoters contained -10 and -35 regions similar to the consensus sequence for E. coli promoters. The activities of three of the five promoters were decreased two- to threefold when a compatible plasmid containing a 3.8-kilobase-pair EcoRI fragment (EcoRI-f) of BK5-T was coresident with the promoter-containing plasmid in either L. lactis subsp. cremoris or E. coli. Data from Tn5 mutagenesis, subcloning experiments, and DNA sequence analysis indicate that this decrease in promoter activity requires a region of EcoRI-f that contains a 621-base-pair open reading frame. This region has been designated bpi (for BK5-T promoter inhibitor).

Bacteriophages↗

Characterization of the Lactococcus lactis lactose operon promoter: contribution of flanking sequences and LacR repressor to promoter activity.

We determined the location, activity, and regulation of the promoter of the Lactococcus lactis 8-kb lactose operon (lacABCDFEGX), which encodes the enzymes of the lactose phosphotransferase system and the tagatose 6-phosphate pathway. The lac promoter sequence corresponds closely to the consensus promoter described for gram-positive bacteria and is located in a back-to-back configuration with the promoter of the divergently transcribed lacR gene, which encodes the LacR repressor. The transcription start sites used under induced (lactose) and noninduced (glucose) conditions were determined. The minimal promoter region that could be isolated on a single restriction fragment included sequences ranging from -75 to +42. The effect of the presence of flanking sequences and the lacR gene on promoter activity and regulation was studied in Escherichia coli and L. lactis strains by using transcriptional fusions with promoterless chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter genes. The results showed that transcriptional regulation of the lac operon is mediated by the interaction between the LacR repressor, the lac promoter, and sequences in the noncoding region between the lacR and lacA genes. Sequences flanking the minimal promoter region appeared to enhance lac promoter activity much more in L. lactis (5- to 38-fold) than in E. coli (1.3- to 5-fold).

Base Sequence↗

Classification and strength measurement of stationary-phase promoters by use of a newly developed promoter cloning vector.

When an Escherichia coli culture changes from exponential growth to the stationary phase, expression of growth-related genes levels off, while a number of stationary-phase-specific genes are turned on. To gain insight into the growth phase-dependent global regulation of genome transcription, we analyzed the strength and specificity of promoters associated with the stationary-phase genes. For the in vivo assay of promoter activity, 300- to 500-bp DNA fragments upstream from the translation initiation codon were isolated and inserted into a newly constructed doubly fluorescent protein (DFP) vector. The activity of test promoters was determined by measuring the green fluorescent protein (GFP). To avoid the possible influence of plasmid copy number, the level of transcription of reference promoter lacUV5 on the same plasmid was determined by measuring the red fluorescent protein (RFP). Thus, the activities of test promoters could be easily and accurately determined by determining the GFP/RFP ratio. Analysis of the culture time-dependent variation of 100 test promoters indicated that (i) a major group of the stationary-phase promoters are up-regulated only in the presence of RpoS sigma; (ii) the phase-coupled increase in the activity of some promoters takes place even in the absence of RpoS; and (iii) the activity of some promoters increases in the absence of RpoS. This classification was confirmed by testing in vitro transcription by using reconstituted RpoD and RpoS holoenzymes.

Bacterial Proteins↗

The host factor polyhedrin promoter binding protein (PPBP) is involved in transcription from the baculovirus polyhedrin gene promoter.

Hypertranscription and temporal expression from the Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis (AcNPV) baculovirus polyhedrin promoter involves an alpha-amanitin-resistant RNA polymerase and requires a trans-acting viral factor(s). We previously reported that a 30-kDa host factor, polyhedrin promoter binding protein (PPBP), binds with unusual affinity, specificity, and stability to the transcriptionally important motif AATAAATAAGTATT within the polyhedrin (polh) initiator promoter and also displays coding strand-specific single-stranded DNA (ssDNA)-binding activity (S. Burma, B. Mukherjee, A. Jain, S. Habib, and S. E. Hasnain, J. Biol. Chem. 269:2750-2757, 1994; B. Mukherjee, S. Burma, and S. E. Hasnain, J. Biol. Chem. 270:4405-4411, 1995). We now present evidence which indicates that an additional factor(s) is involved in stabilizing PPBP-duplex promoter and PPBP-ssDNA interactions. TBP (TATA box binding protein) present in Spodoptera frugiperda (Sf9) cells is characteristically distinct from PPBP and does not interact directly with the polh promoter. Replacement of PPBP cognate sequences within the polh promoter with random nucleotides abolished PPBP binding in vitro and also failed to express the luciferase reporter gene in vivo. Phosphocellulose fractions of total nuclear extract from virus-infected cells which support in vitro transcription from the polh promoter contain PPBP activity. When PPBP was sequestered by the presence of oligonucleotides containing PPBP cognate sequence motifs, in vitro transcription of a C-free reporter cassette was affected but was restored by the exogenous addition of nuclear extract containing PPBP. When PPBP was mopped out in vivo by a plasmid carrying PPBP cognate sequence present in trans, polh promoter-driven expression of the luciferase reporter was abolished, demonstrating that binding of PPBP to the polh promoter is essential for transcription.

Animals↗

Distal apolipoprotein C-III regulatory elements F to J act as a general modular enhancer for proximal promoters that contain hormone response elements. Synergism between hepatic nuclear factor-4 molecules bound to the proximal promoter and distal enhancer sites.

Transient transfection assays have shown that the distal apoC-III promoter segments that contain the regulatory elements F to J enhance the strength of the tandemly linked proximal apoA-I promoter 5- to 13-fold in hepatic (HepG2) cells. Activation in intestinal (CaCo-2) cells to levels comparable to those obtained in HepG2 cells requires a larger apoA-I promoter sequence that extends to nucleotide -1500 as well as the presence of hepatic nuclear factor-4 (HNF-4). The distal apoC-III regulatory elements can also enhance 4- to 8-fold the strength of the heterologous apoB promoter in HepG2 and CaCo-2 cells. Finally, these elements in the presence of HNF-4 enhance 14.5- to 18.5-fold the strength of the minimal adenovirus major late promoter linked to two copies of the hormone response element (HRE) AID of apoA-I in both HepG2 and CaCo-2 cells. In vitro mutagenesis of the promoter/enhancer cluster established that the enhancer activity is lost by a mutation in the HRE present in the 3' end of the regulatory element I (-736 to -714) and is reduced significantly by point mutations or deletions in one or more of the regulatory elements F to J of the apoC-III enhancer. The enhancer activity also requires the HREs of the proximal apoA-I promoter. The apoC-III enhancer can also restore the activity of the proximal apoA-I and apoB promoters that have been inactivated by mutations in CCAAT/enhancers binding protein binding sites, indicating that C/EBP may not participate in the synergistic activation of the promoter/enhancer cluster. The findings suggest that the regulatory elements F to J of the apoC-III promoter act as a general modular enhancer that can potentiate the strength of proximal promoters that contain HREs. Such potentiation in the HepG2 cells can be accounted for by synergistic interactions between HNF-4 or other nuclear hormone receptors bound to the proximal and distal HREs and SP1 or other factors bound to the apoC-III enhancer. Additional factors may be required for optimal activity in CaCo-2 cells as well as for the function of this region as an intestinal enhancer.

Apolipoproteins C↗

SREBP-1 binds to multiple sites and transactivates the human ApoA-II promoter in vitro : SREBP-1 mutants defective in DNA binding or transcriptional activation repress ApoA-II promoter activity.

-Screening of an expression human liver cDNA library resulted in the isolation of several cDNA clones homologous to sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1 (SREBP-1) that recognize the regulatory element AIIAB and AIIK of the human apoA-II promoter. DNaseI footprinting of the apoA-II promoter using SREBP-1 (1 to 460) expressed in bacteria identified 5 overall protected regions designated AIIAB (-64 to -48), AIICD (-178 to -154), AIIDE (-352 to -332), AIIHI (-594 to -574), and AIIK (-760 to -743). These regions contain inverted E-box palindromic or direct repeat motifs and bind SREBP-1 with different affinities. Transient cotransfection experiments in HepG2 cells showed that SREBP-1 transactivated the -911/29 apoA-II promoter 3.5-fold as well as truncated apoA-II promoter segments that contain 1, 2, 3, or 4 SREBP binding sites. Mutagenesis analysis showed that transactivation by SREBP was mainly affected by mutations in element AIIAB. Despite the strong transactivation of the apoA-II promoter by SREBP-1 we could not demonstrate significant changes on the endogenous apoA-II mRNA levels of HepG2 cells after cotransfection with SREBP-1 or in the presence or absence of cholesterol and 25-OH-cholesterol. An SREBP-1 mutant lacking the amino-terminal activation domain bound normally to its cognate sites and repressed the apoA-II promoter activity. Repression was also caused by specific amino acid substitutions of Leu, Val, or Gly for Lys359, which affected DNA binding. Repression by the DNA binding-deficient mutants was abolished by deletion of the amino-terminal activation domain (1 to 90) of SREBP-1. Overall, the findings suggest that the wild-type SREBP-1 can bind and transactivate efficiently the apoA-II promoter in cell culture. SREBP-1 mutants lacking the activation domain bind to their cognate sites and directly repress the apoA-II promoter whereas mutants defective in DNA binding indirectly repress the apoA-II promoter activity, possibly by a squelching mechanism.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 alpha isoforms originated from the P1 promoter are expressed in human pancreatic beta-cells and exhibit stronger transcriptional potentials than P2 promoter-driven isoforms.

The nuclear receptor hepatocyte nuclear factor (HNF) 4 alpha is involved in a transcriptional network and plays an important role in pancreatic beta-cells. Mutations in the HNF4 alpha gene are correlated with maturity-onset diabetes of the young 1. HNF4 alpha isoforms result from both alternative splicing and alternate usage of promoters P1 and P2. It has recently been reported that HNF4 alpha transcription is driven almost exclusively by the P2 promoter in pancreatic islets. We observed that transcripts from both P1 and P2 promoters were expressed in human pancreatic beta-cells and in the pancreatic beta-cell lines RIN m5F and HIT-T15. Expression of HNF4 alpha proteins originating from the P1 promoter was confirmed by immunodetection. Due to the presence of the activation function module AF-1, HNF4 alpha isoforms originating from the P1 promoter exhibit stronger transcriptional activities and recruit coactivators more efficiently than isoforms driven by the P2 promoter. Conversely, activities of isoforms produced by both promoters were similarly repressed by the corepressor small heterodimer partner. These behaviors were observed on the promoter of HNF1 alpha that is required for beta-cell function. Our results highlight that expression of P1 promoter-driven isoforms is important in the control of pancreatic beta-cell function.

Animals↗

The combination of Pit-1 and Pit-1T have a synergistic stimulatory effect on the thyrotropin beta-subunit promoter but not the growth hormone or prolactin promoters.

Pit-1 is a pituitary-specific transcription factor with protein expression limited to thyrotrope, somatotrope, and lactotrope cells of the anterior pituitary gland. We have recently described a thyrotrope-specific variant isoform of Pit-1, called Pit-1T, which contains an additional 14 amino acids in the activation domain generated by an alternate 3'-splicing choice. Pit-1T, in the presence of Pit-1, stimulates the thyrotropin beta-subunit (TSH beta) promoter in a thyrotrope-derived cell that lacks all Pit-1 isoform proteins. Three laboratories have identified another Pit-1 splice variant, called Pit-1 beta, which contains an additional 26 amino acids in the activation domain that is generated by a similar 3'-alternate splice choice. Pit-1 beta has been shown to stimulate the GH promoter, but not the PRL or TSH beta promoters. In this report, we evaluate the effect of the three Pit-1 isoforms (Pit-1, Pit-1T, and Pit-1 beta) on the GH, PRL, and TSH beta promoters when introduced into different cell types. The combination of Pit-1 and Pit-1T had a synergistic stimulatory effect on the TSH beta promoter, but not on the PRL or GH promoters in a thyrotrope-derived cell line that lacks all Pit-1 protein isoforms (alpha TSH cells). When added to GH3 cells, which lack only the Pit-1T isoform, Pit-1T selectively stimulated the TSH beta promoter and not the GH or PRL promoters, suggesting that the thyrotrope-specific Pit-1T exhibits a promoter-specific effect.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Alternative Splicing↗

Enhancer-promoter communication at the yellow gene of Drosophila melanogaster: diverse promoters participate in and regulate trans interactions.

The many reports of trans interactions between homologous as well as nonhomologous loci in a wide variety of organisms argue that such interactions play an important role in gene regulation. The yellow locus of Drosophila is especially useful for investigating the mechanisms of trans interactions due to its ability to support transvection and the relative ease with which it can be altered by targeted gene replacement. In this study, we exploit these aspects of yellow to further our understanding of cis as well as trans forms of enhancer-promoter communication. Through the analysis of yellow alleles whose promoters have been replaced with wild-type or altered promoters from other genes, we show that mutation of single core promoter elements of two of the three heterologous promoters tested can influence whether yellow enhancers act in cis or in trans. This finding parallels observations of the yellow promoter, suggesting that the manner in which trans interactions are controlled by core promoter elements describes a general mechanism. We further demonstrate that heterologous promoters themselves can be activated in trans as well as participate in pairing-mediated insulator bypass. These results highlight the potential of diverse promoters to partake in many forms of trans interactions.

Animals↗

A novel mutation in the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein gene promoter leading to reduced promoter activity.

We have identified a novel cytosine/thymidine polymorphism of the human steroidogenic acute regulatory (StAR) gene promoter located 3 bp downstream of the steroidogenic factor-1 (SF-1)-binding site and 9 bp upstream of the TATA box (ATTTAAG). Carriers of this mutation have a high prevalence of primary aldosteronism. In transfection experiments, basal StAR promoter activity was unaltered by the mutation in murine Y-1 cells and human H295R cells. In Y-1 cells, forskolin (25 microM, 6 h) significantly increased wild-type promoter activity to 230+/-33% (P<0.05, n=4). In contrast, forskolin increased mutated promoter activity only to 150+/-27%, with a significant 35% reduction compared to wild type (P<0.05, n=3). In H295R cells, angiotensin II (AngII; 10 nM) increased wild-type StAR promoter activity to 265+/-22% (P<0.01, n=3), while mutated StAR promoter activity in response to AngII only reached 180+/-29% of controls (P< 0.01, n=3). Gel mobility shift assays show the formation of two additional complexes with the mutated promoter: one with the transcription repressor DAX-1 and another with a yet unidentified factor, which strongly binds the SF-1 response element. Thus, this novel mutation in the human StAR promoter is critically involved in the regulation of StAR gene expression and is associated with reduced promoter activity, a finding relevant for adrenal steroid response to physiological stimulators.

Animals↗

Interaction of Sp1 with the human gamma globin promoter: binding and transactivation of normal and mutant promoters.

We have analyzed the binding of Sp1, a ubiquitously expressed transactivator, to the promoter region of the gamma genes. Low-affinity Sp1 sites were found at -50 and -200. A high-affinity site was detected at -140, over the CACCC sequence. To analyze the function of these sites, Drosophila SL-2 cells, which lack Sp1, were cotransfected with an Sp1 expression plasmid and gamma globin promoter-CAT constructs. In these assays, the gamma promoter was significantly stronger in the presence than in the absence of Sp1. Thus, the three Sp1 sites in the gamma promoter allow binding as well as transactivation of the promoter. The majority of this transactivation was due to the strong binding site at -140 because introduction of a point mutation at -144 (CACCC----AACCC) reduced Sp1-dependent promoter strength by 57%. Analysis of the -200 region suggested that in the wild-type promoter, Sp1 binding at this site contributes little to promoter strength. However, a point mutation (-198 T----C) associated with hereditary persistence of fetal hemoglobin (HPFH) dramatically increased the affinity of this site for Sp1 and significantly increased Sp1 dependent promoter strength in SL-2 cells. Three other point mutations associated with HPFH did not significantly affect the interaction of Sp1 with the -200 region.

Animals↗

Chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter-transcription factor (COUP-TF) represses transcription from the promoter of the gene for ornithine transcarbamylase in a manner antagonistic to hepatocyte nuclear factor-4 (HNF-4).

Chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter-transcription factor (COUP-TF) and hepatocyte nuclear factor-4 (HNF-4) are orphan members of the steroid/thyroid receptor superfamily and exhibit ubiquitous and liver-enriched tissue distribution, respectively. The gene for rat ornithine transcarbamylase (OTC), an ornithine cycle enzyme, is mainly expressed in the liver and is under the control of the promoter and the 11-kilobase upstream enhancer, both of which are liver-selective. Two sites of the promoter region and two sites of the enhancer region of the OTC gene, as well as the ovalbumin promoter site, were recognized by both HNF-4 and COUP-TF, showing that these two factors have closely related binding specificities. Since HNF-4 activated expression from the OTC promoter in cotransfection analysis, this factor appears to participate in liver-selective activation of the OTC gene. On the other hand, COUP-TF repressed the expression from the OTC promoter, whereas it activated expression from several other promoters. Therefore, COUP-TF plays a dual regulatory role depending on the promoter context. Repression of a tissue-specific promoter by a ubiquitous transactivator and derepression by a related tissue-enriched transactivator is potentially an important mechanism for tissue-specific activation of a gene.

Animals↗

Construction and characterization of E. coli promoter-probe plasmid vectors. II. RNA polymerase binding studies on antibiotic-resistance promoters.

The binding of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase to antibiotic-resistance promoters was examined using the nitrocellulose filter assay. Four filter-retainable HaeIII fragments were observed with pBR322 and the promoter-probe plasmids, pBRH1, pBRH2 and pBRH4. Of the three fragments studied, two were shown to carry promoters for the ampicillin (Ap) and tetracycline (Tc) resistance genes, while the third present in pBRH1 appears to be the promoter for colicin E1 immunity (Colimm). Although the formation of filter-retainable complexes involving the Tcr promoter was sensitive to high salt, Apr promoter complexes were not. It was also shown that plasmids containing only the "firm-binding" portion of the Tcr promoter could still bind RNA polymerase in vitro despite the fact that these plasmids confer no in vivo Tcr. Additional filter-binding experiments performed with AluI-digested pBR322 DNA revealed the presence of a fifth RNA polymerase binding site on pBR322. This site is probably the promoter for the 100 bp transcript thought to be involved in the initiation of plasmid replication. An analysis of the recombinant plasmid (pKTR25) which carries the Kan-B portion of the EcoRI kanamycin (Kn) resistance fragment revealed that this fragment contains two RNA polymerase binding sites. We believe that these sites are responsible for the insertional activation of the Tcr gene and may be the promoters for the Knr and fusidic acid (Fa) resistance genes.

DNA, Bacterial↗