Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Operating Rooms”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 163 records · Page 9Linked to original sources

Closed claims review of anesthesia for procedures outside the operating room.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The demand for anesthesia services is increasing due to more complex procedures being performed outside the operating room. We reviewed the literature and closed malpractice claims in the American Society of Anesthesiologists' Closed Claims database to assess liability and injury associated with anesthesia for procedures outside the operating room (nonoperating-room anesthesia, n = 24) compared with intra-operative surgical anesthesia (operating room, n = 1927) claims. RECENT FINDINGS: A higher proportion of patients in nonoperating-room anesthesia claims underwent monitored anesthesia care (58 vs. 6%, P < 0.001) and were at the extremes of age (50 vs. 19%, P = 0.003) than in operating room claims. Half of the nonoperating-room anesthesia claims occurred in the gastrointestinal suite. Inadequate oxygenation/ventilation was the most common specific damaging event in nonoperating-room anesthesia claims (33 vs. 2% in operating room claims, P < 0.001). The proportion of death was increased in nonoperating-room anesthesia claims (54 vs. 24%, P = 0.003). Nonoperating-room anesthesia claims were more often judged as having substandard care (P = 0.003) and being preventable by better monitoring (P = 0.007). SUMMARY: Nonoperating-room anesthesia claims had a higher severity of injury and more substandard care than operating room claims. Inadequate oxygenation/ventilation was the most common mechanism of injury. Maintenance of minimum monitoring standards and airway management training is required for staff involved in patient sedation.

Ambulatory Surgical Procedures↗

Analysis of efficiency of common otolaryngology operations: comparison of operating room vs short procedure room in a pediatric tertiary hospital.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the operative times of routine otolaryngologic procedures performed with 2 different operating room staffing models: the traditional model with 2 staff, a scrub nurse and a circulator, and the short procedure room (SPR) setting, with a circulator only. DESIGN: Retrospective comparison of operative procedure times. Data were extracted from a prospectively maintained database of electronic medical records. SETTING: All data were from procedures performed at a tertiary care children's hospital operating room suite. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Data for the year 2000 were extracted for all outpatient otolaryngology cases of bilateral myringotomy and tube placement (BMT), tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy (TA), and adenoidectomy alone. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The mean +/- SD operative time intervals (operative procedure times and total operative procedure time), anesthesia start times, surgical preparation times, and anesthesia end times of the 2 sites were compared. These time intervals were also compared for the 3 surgeons performing TAs in both settings. RESULTS: Total operative procedure times were significantly shorter in the SPR setting for TA and BMT, but not for adenoidectomy. For TA procedures, operative procedure times and anesthesia end times were significantly shorter in the SPR setting (P<.05). For BMT procedures, all operative times were significantly shorter in the SPR setting. All 3 surgeons who performed TAs in both settings had significantly shorter total operative procedure times in the SPR setting than in the traditional setting. CONCLUSIONS: Despite fewer assisting staff, the SPR setting showed a statistically significant reduction in total operative procedure times for TA and BMT, and results were similar for adenoidectomy. Reducing operating room personnel costs is possible in addition to achieving modest gains in efficiency.

Age Factors↗

[Air pollution by sevoflurane in operating room and serum and urine inorganic fluoride of anesthetists].

Since lower blood-gas partition coefficient of sevoflurane provides rapid induction and emergence from anesthesia, sevoflurane has been used widely for inhalational anesthesia. However, because higher minimum alveolar concentration of sevoflurane requires a large dosage of anesthetic than other volatile anesthetics, air pollution with sevoflurane in the operating room might be of great concern. Anesthetists may keep inhaling the low concentration of anesthetics every day, even though scavenging system is equipped in the operating room. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects on anesthetists of the low concentration of anesthetics by measuring the inorganic fluoride concentration in the urine and serum of anesthetists and operating room nurses. Healthy 29 anesthesiologists and two operating room nurses were studied. Informed consent was obtained. Inorganic fluoride ions in the serum and urine were measured. Simultaneously sevoflurane concentration in operating room was measured in three operating rooms, at two places in the corridor and in the recovery room. Sevoflurane concentrations in three operating rooms were 1.22 ppm, 2.13 ppm and 6.05 ppm respectively. Concentration in the recovery room was 0.544 ppm. Serum and urine concentrations of inorganic fluoride were 1.1 +/- 0.1 mumol.l-1 and 36.2 +/- 17.1 mumol.l-1, respectively (mean +/- SD). Serum concentration of inorganic fluoride was within normal ranges. Although it is possible that fluoride concentration in urine is influenced by urine volume and a half of fluoride deposits in bone, no abnormal values in urine were found in this study. These results suggest that long term exposure to low concentration of sevoflurane and isoflurane causes no significant increase in their metabolites in operating room staffs.

Adult↗

A checklist for components of operating room suites.

Planning an operating room (OR) is a complex process, and it is common to find that essential items are overlooked. A checklist may be one measure for preventing this. An example of this is presented.

Journal Article↗

Work in operating rooms and pregnancy outcome among nurses.

The aim of this study was to analyse the relationship between work in an operating room and pregnancy outcome, as described by the rates of spontaneous abortion and of birth defects. The population comprised the female nurses of 17 hospitals in Paris, interviewed in 1987-1989. An exposed group included all operating room nurses, and a control group was composed of female nurses in other departments matched by hospital, age and duration of service. Each woman described all prior pregnancies. In total, 776 pregnancies were described by 418 nurses who were first pregnant in 1970 or thereafter; ectopic pregnancies, those terminated by voluntary induced abortion and those leading to multiple births were excluded. The rate of spontaneous abortion was significantly higher for pregnancies during which women worked in an operating room than for the other pregnancies. Birth defects were not significantly related to work in an operating room during pregnancy. These results are in agreement with others showing a significant relationship between occupational exposure to operating rooms and spontaneous abortion, although identification of the responsible factor remains difficult. They suggest that effective ventilating systems should be installed in all operating rooms and that special preventive measures must be taken for women of childbearing age.

Abortion, Spontaneous↗

Fire safety in the operating room.

1. A fire in the operating room can cause patient death, staff injuries, and costly equipment, facility, and legal damage for the hospital involved. 2. Taking precautions, both preoperatively and intraoperatively, can greatly reduce the risk of an OR fire. 3. The use of a flammability evaluation form--most appropriately filled out by an interdepartmental team consisting of nursing, surgery, and anesthesia department members--aids in the review and assessment of general fire risks and safety throughout the operating suite.

Fires↗

Comparison of implantation of nonthoracotomy defibrillators in the operating room versus the electrophysiology laboratory.

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) with nonthoracotomy lead systems are widely available, and are implanted either in the electrophysiology laboratory or the operating room. The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of nonthoracotomy ICD implantation in an electrophysiology laboratory versus an operating room. During a 7-month period, 62 consecutive ICDs with nonthoracotomy lead systems were implanted in patients in an electrophysiology laboratory. During the next 10 months, 110 consecutive ICDs were implanted in patients in a surgical operating room. All ICD implantations were performed under general anesthesia by electrophysiologists. There were no differences in age (58 +/- 14 vs 62 +/- 12 years, p = 0.06), gender distribution (p = 0.3), frequency of structural heart disease (97% vs 97%, p = 0.9), ejection fraction (0.31 +/- 0.15 vs 0.29 +/- 0.13, p = 0.3), or presentation with cardiac arrest (65% vs 53%, p = 0.2) between patients undergoing ICD implantation in the electrophysiology laboratory and operating room, respectively. The rate of successful implantation and of complications for systems implanted in the electrophysiology laboratory (95% and 13%, respectively) and in the operating room (98% and 14%, respectively) were similar (p = 0.4 and p = 0.8, respectively). Specifically, the rate of infection (0% vs 4%, p = 0.3) and hematoma formation (2% vs 4%, p = 0.8) were not statistically significantly different. Three patients who had undergone ICD implantation in an operating room died within 30 days. ICDs with nonthoracotomy lead systems can be implanted with a similarly high rate of success and acceptable complication rate in the electrophysiology laboratory and in the operating room.

Adult↗

[Failure of operating room oxygen delivery due to a structural defect in the ceiling column].

Two operating rooms were newly constructed to facilitate the increasing need of surgical services in our university hospital. After a half year of use, the oxygen delivery was suddenly blocked in one of them. Fortunately, the serious incident did not occur because an anesthesiologist identified the blockage of oxygen flow when he checked the anesthesia machine prior to the patient arriving in the operating room. Upon investigation we found the structural defects in ceiling column of that operating room. The pipe containing nitrous oxide and its structural support touched the valve of oxygen supply. It appears that the valve was gradually turned off by this contact while the ceiling column was moved up and down. Once this structural defect had been repaired, there was no longer any incident of the accidental blockage of oxygen to the operating room.

Anesthesiology↗

[General anesthesia outside the operating room in patients with Pierre-Robin syndrome].

Anesthesiologists are increasingly asked to involve in administering general anesthesia outside the operating room for such procedures as computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging or angiography. Especially, pediatric patients require some kind of sedation or general anesthesia during these procedures. We report general anesthesia outside the operating room in patients with Pierre-Robin syndrome, who are expected to have possible difficult airway. A one-year-old girl and a 16-year-old boy were anesthetized for cardiac catheterization. General anesthesia was given at the angiography room which was located outside the operating room. Anesthesia was induced with oxygen, nitrous oxide and sevoflurane while portable storage unit for difficult airway was prepared including various types and size of laryngoscopes, laryngeal mask airway, fiberoptic intubation equipment and surgical airway access. Fortunately, tracheas were successfully intubated without using special devices, although cautious care during induction was taken. According to development of medical and surgical procedures, it is readily presumed that anesthesiologists will be more often involved in the sedation or anesthesia conducted outside the operating room in future. Anesthesiologists should always ensure enough staffing, proper monitoring and equipment when sedation or anesthesia is conducted outside the operating room, particularly if patients have anesthetic risks.

Adolescent↗

Impact of the reduction of anaesthesia turnover time on operating room efficiency.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether an increase in anaesthesia staffing to permit induction of anaesthesia before the previous case had ended ('overlapping') would increase overall efficiency in the operating room. Hitherto, the average duration of operating sessions was too long, thus impeding the timely commencement of physicians' ward duties. METHODS: The investigation was designed as a prospective, non-randomized, interrupted time-series analysis divided into three phases: (a) a baseline of 3.5 months, (b) a 2.5 month intervention phase, in which anaesthesia staffing was increased by one attending physician and one nurse, and (c) a further 2 months under baseline conditions. Data focussed on process management were collected from operating room staff, anaesthesia personnel and surgeons using a structured questionnaire collected daily during the entire study. RESULTS: Turnover time between consecutive operations decreased from 65 to 52 min per operation (95% CI: 9; 17; P = 0.0001). Operating room occupancy increased from 4:28 to 5:27 h day-1 (95% CI: 50; 68; P = 0.005). The surgeons began their work on the ward 35 min (95% CI: 30; 40) later than before the intervention and their overtime increased from 22:36 to 139:50 h. CONCLUSIONS: The time between surgical operations decreased significantly. Increased operating room efficiency owing to overlapping induction of anaesthesia allows more intense scheduling of operations. Thus, physicians and nurses can be released to spend more time with their patients in the ward. Improving the efficiency of the operating room alone is insufficient to improve human resource management at all levels of a surgical clinic.

Anesthesiology↗

[Optimum utilization of the ventilation system to reduce airborne bacteria in operating rooms].

In 4 operating theatres with 4 different air-conditioning equipments, the number of bacteria per m3 circulating air in the neighbourhood of the open wound has been investigated. The testing has been performed on comparable aseptic operations. The worst results were obtained in 2 conventional theatres, equipped with a modern-up-to-date air-conditioning. The number of bacteria was ranging between 230 and 270 per m3. A much better results was obtained in a theatre, equipped with a so-called germ-stop-wall, dividing the theatre into 2 sections, separating the surgical team and the open wound completely from the anaesthesist and other staff. With this arrangement, 45 germs per m3 were found. The best result with no bacteria at all is present in a vertical flow-enclosure with an exchange rate of 32 per hour. According to our 10-year experience, for aseptic surgery sterile air techniques should be adopted to improve asepsis and to decrease the risk of postoperative infection.

Air Conditioning↗

Ultraviolet radiation and the control of airborne contamination in the operating room.

Ultraviolet irradiation has been employed in operating rooms for more than half a century in attempts to reduce airborne bacterial contamination. Safety considerations have limited its intensity to 25-30 mu w cm-2 and at this level no more than a fourfold reduction has resulted. In recent studies intensities up to 300 mu w cm-2 have been used without untoward effects, and, at the highest intensity, contamination as low as that obtained with ultraclean air ventilation systems was obtained. However this was only achieved in an operating room where the level of airborne contamination before the introduction of the radiation was already much lower (around one-fifth) than that usually observed, and the reduction attributable to the radiation was still only about 12-fold.

Air Microbiology↗

Chromosome analysis in operating room personnel.

Cytogenetic tests were performed on operating room personnel working in a Turin hospital. The aim of our study was to determine if any chromosome damage was caused by the use of anaesthetic gases. Blood samples were collected from 45 hospital workers: 15 exposed to anaesthetic gases, 15 exposed to both anaesthetic gases and ionizing radiations and 15 controls. An examination of sister-chromatid exchanges did not highlight significant differences when exposed subjects were compared to controls. Chromosomal aberrations were significantly higher (P = 0.029) in all the exposed personnel, while no statistically significant increase was observed in staff exclusively in contact with anaesthetic gases. Moreover there was a positive correlation for chromosome aberrations with the years of employment, when the entire exposed population was considered and when personnel from the different operating rooms were considered separately. Both sister-chromatid exchange and chromosomal aberrations were higher among smokers though differences were not statistically significant.

Adult↗

Permanent pacemaker implantation in the cardiac catheterization laboratory versus the operating room: an analysis of hospital charges and complications.

Permanent pacemakers may be implanted in operating rooms, special procedure laboratories, or cardiac catheterization laboratories. Previous investigators have shown no difference in efficacy or complications in the operating room versus the cardiac catheterization laboratory. We retrospectively analyzed the hospital bills of 30 patients undergoing permanent pacemaker implantation at our institution. Group I was 15 consecutive patients implanted in the operating room and group II was 15 consecutive patients implanted in the cardiac catheterization laboratory, all by the same operators. Hospital charges that were specific to the site of implantation were analyzed. Physician charges for implantation, anesthesiologist, and radiologist charges were not analyzed. There were no in-hospital complications in either group. The mean charges for group I were $1,856.00 and group II were $1,075.00 (P < 0.001). We conclude that implantation of permanent pacemakers in the cardiac catheterization laboratory is associated with significantly lower hospital charges compared to implantation in the operating room and has an equally low complication rate.

Aged↗

A reliable accounting system for controlled substances in the operating room.

BACKGROUND: Drug abuse is a leading occupational hazard for operating room personnel. Easy access to controlled substances allows drug dependence to develop and flourish. A system that accurately audits the distribution of controlled substances used in the operating room may decrease the onset of drug abuse and make it easier to identify drug addicts. A simple, inexpensive, and reliable system that improves accountability of controlled substances is described in detail. METHODS: This system involves participation by anesthesiologists, operating room nurses, and pharmacists to accurately record amount and type of drugs dispensed, used, wasted, and returned. Periodic, random, qualitative, and quantitative analyses of drugs returned for wastage are performed. RESULTS: In the first 6 months in which the system was used, 6,336 patients were treated and 7,182 ampules of controlled substances were dispensed. Thirty-seven incident reports describing deviations from the protocol occurred. In each case an explanation for the discrepancy was determined and compliance with the protocol was subsequently improved. No cases of drug diversion were discovered or suspected. CONCLUSIONS: The system described is simple and inexpensive to implement and has improved accountability for controlled substance management.

Anesthesiology↗

Physics and function of operating room suction.

A study was done to evaluate the performance of suction apparatus in the operating room. The investigation was prompted by perceived poor suction performance in a suite of new operating rooms built in accordance with Standards Australia (SA) specifications. SA performance tests were conducted on each of four suction outlets in nine operating rooms. All 36 outlets complied with SA standards for flow-rate (minimum 40 L/min) and occluded negative pressure (ONP; minimum -60 kPa). However, 24 collection units failed to comply with standards (ONP) of -40 kPa achieved in less than 4 s when a 4 L disposable suction apparatus was connected (mean time to ONP: 6.1 s, 95% confidence interval: 4.9, 7.3). When smaller capacity suction jars were substituted, more units met SA standards. The standards therefore need revision to include specification of the capacity of the collecting apparatus. Other factors that were found to degrade suction performance significantly were air leakage and defective shut-off valves. The physical principles involved in operating room suction are described. Surgeons and anaesthetists should understand these principles, and it is recommended that a simple pre-operative check of the suction apparatus should be carried out, as follows: (1) Turn the wall control knob fully on, and disconnect the suction apparatus. The gauge should register zero. (2) Connect the suction jars. If the indicated gauge pressure is in excess of -15 kPa, investigate the equipment for excessive resistance, particularly in the shut-off valve, which should be replaced with a new unit if necessary.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Australia↗

Ultraviolet radiation compared to an ultra-clean air enclosure. Comparison of air bacteria counts in operating rooms.

Clean air in the operating room is important during joint replacement surgery. We compared monochromatic ultraviolet radiation of 254 nm with the use of a Charnley-Howorth air enclosure by bacterial air-sampling during 113 total hip arthroplasties. Air samples were taken continuously at the edge of the wound and every 15 minutes at a site 130 cm from the operating table. We also tested the effect of occlusive clothing for all personnel. Ultraviolet light was more efficient than the ultra-clean air enclosure, and occlusive clothing on its own or in combination also produced improvement. The implications of these findings are discussed.

Air Microbiology↗

Results of peripheral endovascular procedures in the operating room.

PURPOSE: This study presents the results of closed (percutaneous) and open endovascular procedures performed exclusively by vascular surgeons in the operating room and compares them with results from combined series from the literature, including primarily closed procedures in radiology or cardiology facilities. METHODS: Retrospective review of 607 consecutive peripheral arterial and venous angioplasties, stents, thrombolytic cases, and inferior vena caval filters in 446 patients was analyzed for immediate success rate, complication rate, and 1-year life table patency rate. RESULTS: The incidence of initial technical success was: aorta, 89%; iliac artery, 91%; superficial femoral artery, 90%; popliteal artery, 91%; tibial arteries, 79%; arm arteries and veins, 86%; renal arteries, 100%; IVC filters, 98%; and iliofemoral veins, 100%. The 1-year primary patency rates, including technical failures, were 70.3% in 113 femoropopliteal procedures and 83.7% in 194 iliac arteries. Advantages to the use of the operating room included: (1) simultaneous angioplasty during a bypass operation for abnormalities proximal or distal to the graft, (2) correction of lesions first discovered during thrombectomy, and (3) optimum patient monitoring and sedation in the operating room. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular procedures performed by vascular surgeons in the operating room lead to results comparable with procedures performed in nonsurgical interventional suites, and the use of the operating room has advantages.

Adult↗