Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Linezolid”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 163 records · Page 9Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

Treatment of prosthetic valve infective endocarditis due to multi-resistant Gram-positive bacteria with linezolid.

OBJECTIVES: Clinical experience with linezolid in the treatment of infective endocarditis either alone or in combination with other agents is limited. We describe our experience in the treatment of two patients with IE due to multi-resistant Gram-positive bacteria. METHODS: One patient with MRSE and one with VRE endocarditis were treated with regimens containing linezolid. The killing kinetics of linezolid in combination with gentamicin or vancomycin against isolates of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Enterococcus faecalis were analysed in vitro. RESULTS: Clinical response and eradication of bacteraemia was achieved with linezolid therapy in both patients. Time-kill curve studies showed that linezolid was bacteriostatic against the MRSE and VRE isolates used. Combination with gentamicin or vancomycin did not produce synergy or antagonism but at best only marginal additive effect. CONCLUSIONS: Although bacteriostatic, linezolid provides an important therapeutic option in IE due to multi-resistant Gram-positive pathogens. It challenges the conventional wisdom that bactericidal synergy is required for the effective treatment of most cases of IE due to Gram-positive organisms.

Acetamides↗
PubMed2004

[Resistance to linezolid in Staphylococcus aureus before its release].

UNLABELLED: Resistance to antibiotics is a global problem in geriatric centres. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of the resistance to linezolid in Staphylococcus aureus strains before its release in a geriatric centre. METHOD: From 03-01-01 to 03-04-30 linezolid was included in the panel of antibiotics tested in S. aureus strains. The susceptibilities were estimated by the disk diffusion test in routine clinical microbiology practice. RESULTS: A total of 213 strains of S. aureus was analysed. All of them were susceptible to the following antibiotics: linezolid, cotrimoxazol, fosfomycin, and glycopeptides. The meticillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) represented 67.1% (60.3-73.3) strains. The resistance to pefloxacin, tobramycin and erythromycin concerned 92.3% (86.3-95.9), 73.4% (65.3-80.3) and 31.5% (24.1-39.8) of MRSA strains respectively. The MRSA strains were less resistant to the following antimicrobial drugs: gentamicin 7.0% (3.6-12.8), fusidic acid 2.1% (0.5-6.5) and rifampicin 1.4% (0.2-5.5). The resistance concerning at the same time gentamicin, pefloxacin and fucidic acid represented 2.1% (0.5-6.5) of SARM strains, rifampicin was not interested. CONCLUSION: Linezolid was effective in vitro in S. aureus strains regardless their susceptibilities in meticillin. According to its effectiveness in vivo, linezolid may be of use for the treatment of infections due to MRSA. However, there has been two reports of resistance of MRSA in clinical infections. The use of linezolid has to follow the instructions and it should be carefully monitored.

Acetamides↗
PubMed1999

Determination of linezolid in plasma by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography.

An HPLC-UV method was developed for assay of linezolid in dog, rat, mouse, and rabbit plasma. Linezolid and the internal standard were extracted on a solid phase cartridge (SPE) and separated on a reversed-phase column (C8, 4.6x150 mm, 5 microm) with 20% acetonitrile in water as mobile phase. The SPE quantitatively recovered linezolid and the internal standard from plasma samples. The chromatographic peak height ratio or peak area ratio based on UV absorbency at 251 nm was used for quantitative analysis. The assay procedures were simple and the assay was specific and had adequate precision and accuracy. Calibration standards with concentrations over the range of 0.01 20 microg/ml were validated for routine sample analysis to support the pharmacokinetic and toxicology studies with linezolid in dog, rat, mouse, and rabbit. Analysis of quality control samples showed the coefficients of variation were usually <10% and the measured and theoretical concentrations differed by <10% in most assays. Linezolid in the plasma samples was stable when stored at below -20 degrees C for at least 63 days, at room temperature (22-23 degrees C) for up to 24 h, and after three freeze-thaw cycles. This HPLC method has been successfully used in multiple laboratories to assay plasma samples from pharmacokinetic and toxicology studies with linezolid in the animal species.

Acetamides↗
PubMed2002

Comparative activity of linezolid against staphylococci and enterococci isolated in Italy.

The activity of linezolid, a new oxazolidinone, was tested against 862 Gram-positive cocci isolated in Italy and compared with the activities of 12 antibiotics. Overall, MIC90s for linezolid (2-4 mg/L) indicated an in vitro activity comparable to that of vancomycin in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (4 mg/L), S. epidermidis (2 mg/L) and methicillin-susceptible strains. Enterococcus faecalis strains were susceptible to linezolid (MIC90 2-4 mg/L), glycopeptides and beta-lactams. In E. faecium, only glycopeptides (MIC90 2 mg/L) and linezolid (MIC90 2 mg/L) were active. Linezolid was the only drug active against two strains of Enterococcus showing a VanA phenotype. Owing to its antibacterial profile, linezolid represents a promising drug for the treatment of Gram-positive infections.

Acetamides↗
PubMed2001

Successful treatment of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium meningitis with linezolid: case report and literature review.

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are a rare cause of meningitis, occurring primarily in patients who have undergone neurosurgical procedures. We describe the first reported case of VRE meningitis successfully treated with linezolid. A 56-y-old female with subarachnoid hemorrhage underwent ventriculostomy and embolization of cerebral aneurysms. Her postoperative course was complicated by multiple infections needing repeated antibiotic courses, culminating in the development of VRE meningitis. She was treated with 600 mg of i.v. linezolid (MIC < 0.75 microg/ml) every 12 h for 6 weeks. After the fourth dose, peak and trough linezolid concentrations were 11.45 and 0.14 microg/ml in serum and 3.19 and 2.39 microg/ml in cerebral spinal fluid (CSF). On Day 19 of linezolid therapy, serum and CSF trough concentrations were 1.53 and 2.98 microg/ml, respectively. Linezolid achieved sufficient CSF concentrations to bring about clinical and bacteriological cure. We conclude that i.v. linezolid may be a useful option for treating VRE meningitis. We also present findings of a literature review, which identified 11 cases of VRE meningitis treated with other pharmacologic agents with mixed success.

Acetamides↗
PubMed2004

Similar hematologic effects of long-term linezolid and vancomycin therapy in a prospective observational study of patients with orthopedic infections.

Linezolid is an alternative to vancomycin for the long-term treatment of gram-positive bacterial orthopedic infections because of its antibacterial spectrum and oral bioavailability, but duration-related myelosuppression could offset its advantages. To evaluate the hematologic effects of these agents, we prospectively studied 65 consecutive adults with gram-positive bacterial orthopedic infections requiring > or =2 weeks of vancomycin therapy (n=52) or linezolid therapy (n=20). Trends suggesting higher incidence of hematologic effects among the patients receiving vancomycin were not significant, regardless of whether the end point was lowest cell count during therapy or change from baseline. The only difference was a higher incidence of thrombocytopenia (<150x10(9) platelets/L) in the subset of the linezolid recipients who had received vancomycin within 2 weeks before starting linezolid therapy than in the linezolid recipients who had not received vancomycin (5 [71%] of 7 patients vs. 2 [15%] of 13; P=.02). All hematologic effects were reversible. In conclusion, hematologic effects were detectable through weekly monitoring and were reversible; therefore, concern about myelosuppression need not preclude linezolid use for orthopedic infections requiring long-term therapy.

Acetamides↗
PubMed2006

Linezolid-induced inhibition of mitochondrial protein synthesis.

BACKGROUND: Linezolid is an oxazolidinone antibiotic that is increasingly used to treat drug-resistant, gram-positive pathogens. The mechanism of action is inhibition of bacterial protein synthesis. Optic and/or peripheral neuropathy and lactic acidosis are reported side effects, but the underlying pathophysiological mechanism has not been unravelled. METHODS: We studied mitochondrial ultrastructure, mitochondrial respiratory chain enzyme activity, and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) in muscle, liver, and kidney samples obtained from a patient who developed optic neuropathy, encephalopathy, skeletal myopathy, lactic acidosis, and renal failure after prolonged use of linezolid. In addition, we evaluated mtDNA, respiratory chain enzyme activity, and protein amount in muscle and liver samples obtained from experimental animals that received linezolid or placebo. RESULTS: In the patient, mitochondrial respiratory chain enzyme activity was decreased in affected tissues, without ultrastructural mitochondrial abnormalities and without mutations or depletion of mtDNA. In the experimental animals, linezolid induced a dose- and time-dependent decrease of the activity of respiratory chain complexes containing mtDNA-encoded subunits and a decreased amount of protein of these complexes, whereas the amount of mtDNA was normal. CONCLUSION: These results provide direct evidence that linezolid inhibits mitochondrial protein synthesis with potentially severe clinical consequences. Prolonged courses of linezolid should be avoided if alternative treatment options are available.

Acetamides↗
PubMed2001

In situ measurement of linezolid and vancomycin concentrations in intravascular catheter-associated biofilm.

We describe a new method for the measurement of antimicrobial concentrations in the biofilm associated with the endoluminal surface of intravascular catheters. We quantified endoluminal planktonic bacteria in haemodialysis catheters using the acridine orange method on catheter blood. After catheter removal, separate lumens were perfused in vitro with either vancomycin or linezolid to simulate in vivo antibiotic infusion. Biofilm was recovered using endoluminal brushes, weighed and assayed by fluoroimmunoassay for vancomycin and by bioassay for linezolid. Viable bacteria were counted by serial dilution and agar plating. Biofilm had measurable amounts of vancomycin in 11/11 catheter lumens post-infusion (0.3-18.2 mg biofilm per lumen, mean 6.8 mg; vancomycin concentration 0.2-89 mg/g biofilm, median 19 mg/g). By comparison, linezolid was detected in 4/11 catheter lumens post-infusion (0.5-18.1 mg biofilm per lumen, mean 5.9 mg; linezolid concentration 0.9-6.1 mg/g biofilm, median 1.5 mg/g). Percentage reductions in biofilm-associated bacterial counts post-antibiotic were 84-100%, median 95% (vancomycin) and 0-98%, median 91% (linezolid). We found a significant difference (P = 0.05; Wilcoxon rank sum test) in vancomycin concentrations in coagulase-negative staphylococcal biofilm (median 17.0 mg/g, mean 27.9 mg/g) compared with glycopeptide levels found in biofilm associated with other microorganisms (median 5.5 mg/g, mean 6.9 mg/g). Biofilm concentrations of vancomycin are generally higher than linezolid after antibiotic infusion, which can be explained partly by glycopeptide binding to glycocalyx. Neither antibiotic achieved consistent 100% kill of biofilm bacteria after single infusions, even when a very high concentration was present. The endoluminal brush technique can be used to measure antibiotic concentration in intravascular catheter-associated biofilm in situ. This approach can be exploited to measure biofilm antibiotic concentrations in vivo, without the need for catheter removal.

Acetamides↗
PubMed2001

Efficacy of linezolid in a staphylococcal endocarditis rabbit model.

A rabbit endocarditis model was used to test the efficacy of oral linezolid and iv vancomycin. Twenty-four hours after catheter placement across the aortic valve, rabbits were infected with 3.5 x 10(6) cfu of Staphylococcus aureus (UC-9258). Two days after infection, control rabbits were killed, and treated rabbits were given 5 days of therapy with linezolid at 8 h intervals (tds) using either 25, 50 or 75 mg/kg/dose, or vancomycin at 12 h intervals (bd) using 25 mg/kg/dose. Linezolid at 75 and 50 mg/kg, and vancomycin significantly reduced S. aureus in aortic valve vegetations compared with the control. Linezolid at 25 mg/kg was ineffective. The efficacy of 75 and 50 mg/kg linezolid was related to maintenance of plasma drug levels near or above the linezolid MIC for UC-9258 (2 mg/L).

Acetamides↗
PubMed2001

A simple, isocratic high-performance liquid chromatography assay for linezolid in human serum.

A rapid high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay for the detection of linezolid in human serum was developed. The method used a Hypersil 5ODS stationary phase. The mobile phase was 1% ortho-phosphoric acid, 30% methanol, 2 g/L heptane sulphonic acid, pH 5. UV absorbance detection was used (lambda(max) 254 nm). Samples were prepared by mixing with acetonitrile and an injection volume of 20 microL was used. The inter- and intra-day assay reproducibility were assessed. Assay linearity, specificity and accuracy were investigated. The detection limit and recovery of linezolid from serum were determined. In addition, the stability of linezolid, stored under a variety of conditions, was assessed. The retention time of linezolid was c. 6.5 min. The intra- and inter-day reproducibility was good and the assay was linear across the therapeutic range. Serum recovery was c. 100% at all concentrations tested. The detection limit was 0.1 mg/L and the assay was accurate. The assay was specific as there was no significant interference with the linezolid peak. Linezolid was demonstrated to be stable. This rapid assay is ideal for busy clinical laboratories with basic HPLC equipment.

Acetamides↗
PubMed2002

Virulence factor expression by Gram-positive cocci exposed to subinhibitory concentrations of linezolid.

Linezolid is a new oxazolidinone with potent antibacterial activity against Gram-positive cocci; it uniquely inhibits bacterial translation through inhibition of 70S initiation complex formation. The effects of sub-growth-inhibitory concentrations of linezolid on the expression of various structural and soluble virulence factors of Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes were examined. For S. aureus, strains Wood 46 and Cowan 1 (NCTC 8532) were used to measure protein A, coagulase, alpha-haemolysin (hla) and delta-haemolysin (hld). For S. pyogenes, strain NCTC 9994 was used to measure M protein, streptolysin O (SLO) and DNase. Coagulase was assayed by clotting of citrated rabbit plasma, and hla, hld and SLO by lysis of rabbit, human and horse erythrocytes, respectively. Protein A and M protein were measured indirectly using bacterial susceptibility to phagocytic ingestion of radiolabelled bacteria by human neutrophils. When S. aureus was grown in 1/2, 1/4 and 1/8 MIC, linezolid, coagulase, hla and hld production were impaired. Susceptibility to phagocytosis was changed by growth in the presence of 1/2 MIC linezolid compared with that in its absence (50.8 +/- 4.1% versus 38.9 +/- 2.9%; P <or= 0.05). When S. pyogenes was grown in 1/2, 1/4 and 1/8 MIC linezolid, SLO and DNase production were impaired compared with that of bacteria grown in the absence of the drug; its susceptibility to phagocytosis was also increased (52.8% bacteria ingested versus 37.5%; P <or= 0.05). A reduction in virulence factor expression at sub-MIC linezolid concentrations may be of benefit in the treatment of Gram-positive infections.

Acetamides↗
PubMed2002

The efficacy and safety of linezolid as treatment for Staphylococcus aureus infections in compassionate use patients who are intolerant of, or who have failed to respond to, vancomycin.

OBJECTIVE: The incidence of infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus continues to increase annually. Unfortunately, only a few therapeutic agents are available for the treatment of patients with such infections and all of the existing drugs have limitations. A pressing need exists, therefore, to identify new antibiotics for use in this clinical setting. The efficacy and safety of linezolid were studied in a compassionate use treatment programme and the results of treating a subset of patients with S. aureus infections are presented here. METHODS: Patients received linezolid in a dosage of 600 mg intravenously (iv) and/or orally twice daily. Clinical and bacteriological responses were assessed after a minimum of 7 days and following completion of therapy. RESULTS: Seven hundred and ninety-six patients who suffered 828 episodes of infection were enrolled in the linezolid compassionate use protocol. Of these, 183 patients received linezolid for 191 infections caused by S. aureus; in 151 cases, patients were intolerant of vancomycin, had a mixed S. aureus/vancomycin-resistant enterococcal infection or had no iv access, and, in 40 cases, patients had failed to respond to treatment with vancomycin. The median age of the patients was 57 years (range 14-93 years) and 53.9% were female. The predominant sites of infection were as follows: bone or joint (27.2%); skin and skin structure (25.1%); bloodstream (20.9%); and lower respiratory tract (12.6%). The clinical success rates in the clinically evaluable and all-treated populations were 83.9% and 62.3%, respectively, whereas the bacteriological eradication rates were 76.9% and 70.2% in the bacteriologically evaluable and all-treated populations, respectively. Linezolid was well tolerated. In 76 (39.8%) of the 191 episodes of infection, patients experienced one or more adverse events or exhibited one or more abnormal laboratory results; in 35 (18.3%) of the 191 cases it was necessary to discontinue treatment. Gastrointestinal tract-related symptoms (nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea) were the most common possibly or probably related adverse events and the most common reasons for drug discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: Linezolid was effective and well tolerated in patients with S. aureus infections who were enrolled in this compassionate use protocol.

Acetamides↗
PubMed2003

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of linezolid in healthy volunteers and patients with Gram-positive infections.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of linezolid have been extensively investigated in laboratory models, healthy volunteers and patients. Three formulations exist: an intravenous (iv) form, film-coated tablets and an oral suspension. Linezolid can be assayed in serum and body fluids by HPLC and has good bioavailability with a Cmax at 0.5-2 h. The protein binding is 31%, and the volume of distribution is 30-50 L with adequate to good tissue penetration into skin blister fluids, bone, muscle, fat, alveolar cells, lung extracellular lining fluid and CSF. There are two major metabolites of linezolid (PNU-142586 and PNU-142300). Non-enzymic formation of PNU-142586 is the rate-limiting step in the clearance of linezolid, and linezolid and its two main metabolites plus several minor ones are all excreted in the urine. Dose linearity is evident in the Cmax and AUC across a wide range of doses. Gender and age have little effect on pharmacokinetics, but children have greater plasma clearance and volume of distribution and hence, have lower serum concentrations for equivalent doses in adults. No dose modification is needed in mild to moderate liver disease or any degree of renal impairment; however, both PNU-142586 and PNU-142300 accumulate in renal failure. Linezolid is bacteriostatic with a significant post-antibiotic effect against the key pathogens. In animal models of infection, the time the antibiotic concentration exceeds the MIC (t > MIC) helps to determine outcome, and a t > MIC of 40% is predictive of a bacteriostatic effect for both staphylococci and pneumococci. In man, t > MIC and AUC/MIC have been related to bacteriological and clinical outcomes. AUC and length of treatment are also related to the risk of thrombocytopenia.

Acetamides↗
PubMed2003

Intrapulmonary penetration of linezolid.

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to measure the concentrations of linezolid in bronchial mucosa, pulmonary macrophages and epithelial lining fluid and to compare them with simultaneous blood levels. METHODS: Ten adult patients undergoing bronchoscopy for diagnostic purposes were given oral linezolid at a dosage of 600 mg twice a day for a total of six doses. Patients with active lung infection were excluded from the study. Flexible bronchoscopy was carried out between 2 and 8 h after the last dose of linezolid. Bronchial biopsies and bronchoalveolar lavage were carried out and a simultaneous blood sample obtained. Linezolid levels were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). RESULTS: Mean concentrations of linezolid were 13.4 mg/L in serum, 10.7 mg/kg in mucosa, 8.1 mg/L in alveolar macrophages and 25.1 mg/L in epithelial lining fluid. The mean site/serum concentration ratios were 0.79 for bronchial mucosa, 0.71 for macrophages and 8.35 for epithelial lining fluid. CONCLUSIONS: The MIC90 (< or =4 mg/L) of linezolid for Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae was exceeded in serum and bronchial mucosa in all subjects, in epithelial lining fluid in nine subjects and in macrophages in six subjects.

Acetamides↗
PubMed2004

Prospective, randomized study comparing quinupristin-dalfopristin with linezolid in the treatment of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium infections.

OBJECTIVES: Quinupristin-dalfopristin and linezolid have been shown to be efficacious in the treatment of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF) infections. However, the two antibiotics have not been compared in terms of safety and efficacy in a prospective randomized study. The objective of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of the two drugs in the treatment of VREF infections in cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty cancer patients with VREF infection were randomized to receive linezolid 600 mg every 12 h or quinupristin-dalfopristin 7.5 mg/kg every 8 h. All patients were followed up for 30 days after discontinuation of study drugs. RESULTS: Linezolid and quinupristin-dalfopristin had comparable clinical responses (58% and 43%, respectively, P = 0.6). Myalgias and/or arthralgias occurred at a frequency of 33% in patients who received quinupristin-dalfopristin, but were not observed in the linezolid group (P = 0.03). In contrast, drug-related thrombocytopenia occurred in 11% of patients who received linezolid, but was not observed in the quinupristin-dalfopristin group (P = 0.2). CONCLUSION: In cancer patients, quinupristin-dalfopristin treatment is associated with a relatively high frequency of myalgias/arthralgias; however, profound thrombocytopenia might limit the choice of linezolid in a subpopulation of cancer patients.

Acetamides↗
PubMed2004

Reversion to susceptibility in a linezolid-resistant clinical isolate of Staphylococcus aureus.

OBJECTIVES: Linezolid resistance in rare isolates of Staphylococcus aureus has been associated with G2576T mutations in domain V of the 23S rRNA gene. We report the analysis of a clinical S. aureus isolate that developed linezolid resistance (MIC of linezolid of 12 mg/L) after a 25 day course of the drug. Sequencing identified G2576T mutations in four of the five copies of the 23S rRNA gene. METHODS: To examine the stability of this resistance, we serially passaged this original isolate 60 times over a 75 day period on antimicrobial-free medium. RESULTS: After 30 passages, the MIC of linezolid had decreased to 8 mg/L and only two of the five copies of the 23S rRNA gene contained the G2576T mutation. After 60 passages, the MIC of linezolid fell to 2 mg/L and only one of the five 23S rRNA gene copies contained the mutation. The original and two passaged staphylococci were indistinguishable by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of antibiotic pressure, linezolid resistance was unstable in a clinical isolate that did not have all copies of the 23S rRNA gene mutated, although a single copy of mutant rDNA was maintained. Gene conversion was probably the mechanism for this reversion, using the wild-type 23S rRNA gene sequences to replace the G2576T mutation by homologous recombination.

Acetamides↗
PubMed2005

Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of linezolid during continuous venovenous haemofiltration.

OBJECTIVES: Linezolid is a new antibacterial agent with a broad spectrum of activity against Gram-positive pathogens including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp., and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. The aim of this prospective, single-centre, open-label, two-arm study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics of linezolid during continuous venovenous haemofiltration (CVVH) in critically ill patients and to derive a dosage recommendation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty anuric ICU patients undergoing CVVH (mean age and body weight 60.7 +/- 10.9 years and 86.0 +/- 18.0 kg) were included. All patients received linezolid 600 mg intravenously every 12 h. CVVH was performed using highly permeable polysulphone membranes (PSHF 1200, Baxter, Germany and AV 400, Fresenius, Germany). Mean blood flow rate and ultrafiltration rate were 186 +/- 15 and 40 +/- 8 mL/min, respectively. Post-dilution was performed. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of linezolid in critically ill patients with acute renal failure undergoing CVVH were comparable to healthy subjects and patients without renal impairment. The elimination half-life, total clearance and haemofiltration clearance were 4.3 +/- 1.7 h, 9.3 +/- 3.5 L/h and 1.9 +/- 0.8 L/h, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that linezolid was highly removable by CVVH. These data suggest that a schedule of 600 mg linezolid at least twice daily may also be an appropriate dosing for patients with severe Gram-positive infections undergoing CVVH with both types of membranes.

Acetamides↗
PubMed2006

Does haemodialysis significantly affect serum linezolid concentrations in critically ill patients with renal failure? A pilot investigation.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that a single haemodialysis (HD) session removes about one-third of the linezolid dose administered, but it is unknown whether in critically ill patients with renal failure on intermittent HD, this removal adversely affects serum antibiotic concentrations. METHODS: Five male critically ill patients (mean age 75 years, range 68-82; APACHE II score 26.4, range 23-29; survival 2/5) with sepsis and renal failure on haemodialysis, were administered i.v. linezolid, 600 mg every 12 h. Serum antibiotic levels were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. We classified trough concentrations as 'with HD' when a HD session was performed after linezolid infusion, and 'without HD' otherwise. We also computed population pharmacokinetics while patients were on-dialysis and off-dialysis. RESULTS: A total of 222 serum linezolid concentrations were available over 36 days of antibiotic therapy, during which patients underwent 31 HD sessions. Trough serum linezolid levels averaged 5.83 mg/l (range 1.48-15.84), exceeding 4.0 mg/l in 68.9% of the samples; however, the trough levels 'with HD' were lower than those 'without HD' (4.68 mg/l [range 1.48-9.07] vs 6.74 mg/l [range 2.04-15.84], P<0.001). Clearance and half-life were 6.0 l/h and 4.0 h, respectively, while patients were on-dialysis, and 4.4 l/h and 7.3 h, respectively, when they were off-dialysis. CONCLUSIONS: HD can significantly reduce serum linezolid levels in critically ill patients with renal failure.

APACHE↗