Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Inhalation”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 163 records · Page 9Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

[Teaching to inhale: better utilization of powder inhalators after counseling and instruction].

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of instruction of patients who used an dry powder device on the correct performance of the inhalation technique and whether the effect lasts. DESIGN: Prospective. METHOD: A number of patients who used at least one drug by the dry powder devices Diskhaler or Diskus/Accuhaler were asked to demonstrate their inhalation technique in the outpatient clinic, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. On a score list the receptionist recorded the correctness of every step of use of the device. Then information and instruction on the correct performance of the inhalation technique were supplied by the same receptionist until the patient mastered the inhalation technique. A simple instruction card was handed to the patient. At the next outpatient visit the effect of the instruction was measured by means of the same score list registered by the same or another receptionist. RESULTS: Data from 97 patients could be evaluated; 42 men and 55 women, with a mean age of 58 years (range: 16-84). The percentage of patients who performed all essential actions correctly increased from 12 to 62. Almost all actions were performed better at the second than at the first visit. Better inhaling technique was observed in the 53 patients who paid their second visit within 30 days as well as in the 44 who came later (mean: 96 days; range: 34-352). CONCLUSION: The performance of the inhalation technique with the Diskhaler and the Diskus/Accuhaler was poor. By means of instruction the inhalation technique improved. This improvement was also seen in the group checked after an average of 3 months.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2003

Budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler (Symbicort) reduces healthcare costs compared with separate inhalers in the treatment of asthma over 12 months.

This open, multinational, randomised, parallel-group, six-month extension conducted in the Swedish centres of a previous six-month study compared the costs of a total of 12 months of treatment with budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler with budesonide plus formoterol separate inhalers in 320 adults with asthma. Patients received budesonide/formoterol (Symbicort Turbuhaler) 160/4.5 mg delivered doses, two inhalations b.i.d., or corresponding doses of budesonide (Pulmicort Turbuhaler) plus formoterol (Oxis Turbuhaler). Direct costs and indirect costs were estimated. Budesonide/formoterol treatment was associated with reduced healthcare service utilisation and statistically significant reductions in direct (SEK1595, p=0.0004) and total costs (SEK1884, p=0.043) per person per year compared with budesonide plus formoterol. Budesonide/formoterol reduced the average annual emergency room admission cost per person by SEK489.7 (31% of direct cost reduction) and physician costs by SEK235.4 (15%).The direct cost of study, relief and other medication was reduced by SEK893.8 (47% of total reduction). There were no statistically significant differences in efficacy and safety parameters following treatment with budesonide/formoterol from single or separate inhalers, other than a significantly lower proportion of withdrawals with the single inhaler (9.2% vs 19.4%, p=0.008). In summary, budesonide/formoterol treatment from a single inhaler reduced 12-month treatment costs compared with separate inhalers, while maintaining at least as good control of asthma.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2006

The therapeutic effects of inhaled long-acting beta2-adrenergics (LABA) and corticosteroids (ICS) are not affected by their inhalation sequence in moderate/persistent asthma.

UNLABELLED: Bronchial asthma is defined as "a chronic inflammatory disease of the airways involving many cells" and inhaled corticosteroids have therefore become the fundamental drugs for the long-term management of the disease. In moderate and severe persistent asthma the use of a long-acting bronchodilator is recommended in order to control symptoms and to enhance the efficacy of corticosteroids. Although not based on scientific evidence, it has been assumed that the, 2 adrenergic and the inhaled steroid should be administered in a strict inhalation sequence: the bronchodilatator first and then the steroid. The aim of the study was to assess the effects of this assumption experimentally, common indeed since long ago. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve subjects with moderate-persistent asthma (7 males, aged 18-64, basal FEV1 = 65.59% pred. +/- 7.59 ds; reversibility = + 14.8% +/- 8.3 ds from baseline after Salbutamol 200mg), symptomatic despite the regular home treatment with Fluticasone p. 250mg bid and beta 2 short-acting prn for over 6 weeks, were initially treated with combined SM/FP 50/250mg bid from an unique Diskus" device, for 6 weeks. After this initial phase, the treatment continued according to a randomised, double-blind, cross-over design: all subjects received the same drugs, from two different Diskus" inhalers, and according to two different sequences of administration: 1) SM first and FP 20' later for 4 weeks, and then FP first and SM 20' later for a further 4 weeks; 2) vice versa. No wash-out period was included between these two phases of cross-over treatment. FEV1 (% pred.); morning PEF (L/min), the use of short-acting beta 2 as required (n/week); the number of awakenings at night (n/week), and the daytime asthma symptom score were measured. STATISTICS: The t paired test and anova (Duncan test) were used for statistical comparisons: a p<0.05 was accepted as the minimum level of significance. RESULTS: After the first six weeks of treatment with combined Salmeterol/Fluticasone, 50/250 mg FEV1 changed from 69.6% pred. +/- 7.59 ds to 79.8% pred. +/- 10.1 ds (p>0.005), whilst the morning PEF changed from 282.2 l/min : 64.1 ds to 333.4 l/min +/- 55.5 ds (p<0.02). Furthermore, the consumption of beta 2 adrenergic prn dropped from 4.4 (no./week) +/- 7.3 ds to 1.2 +/- 0.9 ds (p<0.001); the number of night-time awakenings decreased from 1.6 (no./week) +/- 0.2 ds to 0.2 +/- 0.3 ds (p<0.001), and the daytime symptom score changed from 3.4 +/- ds 0.8 to 1.9 +/- 0.7 ds (p<0.001). This therapeutic performance was maintained over the two subsequent 4-week periods of treatment from two distinct devices independently of the inhalation sequence. In particular, by both using salmeterol first or using fluticasone first, the therapeutic effects proved quite identical: FEV1: 80.7 % pred. +/- 9.5 ds and 80.3 +/- 7.4 ds; morning PEF: 336.5 l/min +/- 55.4 ds and 338.6 l/min +/- 67.1 ds; consumption of beta 2 adrenergic as required: 0.9 (no./week) +/- 0.6 ds and 0.9 (no./week) +/- 0.8 ds; number of awakenings: 0.3 (no./week) +/- 0.3 and 0.2 (no./week) +/- 0.3 ds; day-time/night-time symptom score: 1.7 +/- 0.5 ds and 1.8 +/- 0.6 ds, respectively (anova = ns). CONCLUSIONS: Both in terms of lung function and of clinical outcomes the efficacy of SM and FP administration proved completely independent of the particular sequence for their separate inhalation and quite superimposable to thatachieved b y their combined inhalation from an unique device.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed1991

The effect of inhalation flow on the performance of a dry powder inhalation system.

Dry powder inhalation systems are composed of a small amount of active ingredients and a larger amount of filler. The drug particles are believed to be bound by the filler crystals. The complexes are too large to be inhaled and need to be separated before they enter the lungs. This is done by the air patients inhale through the inhaler. Asthmatics can show low inhalation flows and the performance of a dry powder inhaler at low flows was investigated. It was shown, that small particles (less than 5 microns) separate swiftly at low flows and larger particles (greater than 5 microns) will need higher flows. The conclusion is that dry powder inhalation preparation do not show a simple separation pattern.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed1987

Comparison of inhaled metaproterenol, inhaled atropine sulfate, and their combination in treatment of children with acute asthma.

The separate and combined effects of inhaled metaproterenol and atropine sulfate were evaluated in the treatment of 44 episodes of acute asthma occurring in 35 children ranging in age from 13 months to 13 years. Peak expiratory flow rate and pulmonary index were measured before and after each of up to three inhalation treatments. Significant improvement in peak flow rate (P less than .04) was noted after the second inhalation of metaproterenol both with and without the combination of atropine sulfate compared with the effects of atropine alone. Patients treated with metaproterenol and metaproterenol combined with atropine also experienced fewer therapeutic failures (2/15 and 2/16, respectively) compared with those treated with atropine (6/13, P less than .02). Pulmonary index scores did not differ among the treatment groups. Inhaled metaproterenol appears to be more effective than inhaled atropine sulfate in the treatment of children with acute asthma. The addition of inhaled atropine sulfate appears to offer no advantage over treatment with inhaled metaproterenol alone.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1995

Effects of corticosteroid inhalation therapy on lung ventilation and alveolar permeability in asthma using TC-99M DTPA radioaerosol inhalation lung scintigraphy.

This study evaluates the effects of steroid inhalation on lung ventilation (LV) and alveolar permeability (AP) in 26 patients with asthma. The homogeneity of LV was evaluated as the inhalated Tc-99m diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA) radioaerosol depositing ratios of the central 1/3 over peripheral 1/3 of the left lung. It is shown as a distribution factor (DF) in this study. The damage in AP was measured from the speed of Tc-99m DTPA radioaerosol clearance curves from the peripheral alveoli of the left lung and is represented as a slope in this study. The baseline LV and AP were calculated before an inhalation therapy of 0.05 mg beclomethasone dipropionate four times daily for one week, then the studies were repeated after treatment to evaluate the effects of inhalation therapies. The results revealed a significantly improved homogeneity of LV in 16/26 (62%) cases (DF: 0.79 +/- 0.32 vs 0.59 +/- 0.22, P = 0.0001), but no apparent change in AP (slope: 1.18 +/- 0.78 vs 1.25 +/- 0.88, P = 0.052) after the treatment. In conclusion, a corticosteroid inhalation therapy for asthma can improve the peripheral LV, but can not change the AP according to the findings of Tc-99m DTPA radioaerosol inhalation lung scintigraphy. We suggest that the widely available Tc-99m DTPA radioaerosol inhalation lung scintigraphy, coupled with the evaluation of LV and AP could contribute to any disorder involving both alveoli and airways.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Comparative study of inhaled amiloride and inhaled furosemide in exercise-induced asthma.

BACKGROUND: Certain diuretics such as furosemide, when inhaled, have been found to be useful in preventing Exercise-Induced Asthma (EIA). STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the possible preventive effect of inhaled amiloride in EIA. DESIGN: A double blind, randomized, cross-over study comparing the effect of inhaled amiloride, inhaled furosemide and placebo in EIA. PATIENTS: Sixteen asthmatic patients (8 males and 8 females) with an average age of 21 years (range 9-31) who presented a FEV1 decrease of over 15% in a previous free-running exercise test. INTERVENTIONS: Solutions were inhaled with a Hudson nebulizer connected to an oxygen source in different days before exercise testing. A Vitalograph Compact (Ohmeda, England) spirometer was used and FEV1 was obtained at baseline, three minutes after solution inhalation, immediately after exercise and then every 5 min. until 20 minutes post-exercise. The changes in FEV1 percentages (FEV1%) and the mean FEV1 decreases expressed as percentages for each solution were compared. RESULTS: Inhaled furosemide diminished the fall in the FEV1 at every time after exercise. The maximum decrease in mean FEV1 was at 5 minutes post-exercise and was 11 +/- 7% with furosemide, 24 +/- 14% (p < 0.01) with amiloride and 19 +/- 12% (p < 0.05) with placebo. Amiloride administration resulted in a slight but significative increase in the FEV1 fall (p < 0.01 when compared with placebo). CONCLUSIONS: Amiloride is not useful to protect EIA whereas Furosemide does it. These differences results may be related to the differents mechanisms of action of the two diuretics.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2004

Comparison of patient preference and ease of teaching inhaler technique for Pulmicort Turbuhaler versus pressurized metered-dose inhalers.

A multicenter, randomized, open-label, crossover study with two 4-week evaluation periods compared patient preference and ease of teaching correct inhaler technique for Pulmicort Turbuhaler versus pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs). Patients 18 to 65 years of age with stable, mild to moderate asthma, who required or were eligible for inhaled corticosteroid therapy, were randomized to treatment sequences consisting of 4-week evaluation periods with Pulmicort Turbuhaler (budesonide inhalation powder) two puffs (400 microg) bid and one of three inhaled corticosteroids via pMDI: Aerobid-M (flunisolide) four puffs (1 mg) bid, Flovent (fluticasone propionate) two puffs (440 microg) bid, or Vanceril Double Strength (beclomethasone dipropionate) five puffs (420 microg) bid. Patients indicated device preference at study end and completed the Patient Device Experience Assessment (PDEA) questionnaire after each evaluation period. Ease of teaching, time required to master use of the device, percentage of patients demonstrating mastery on the first attempt, and the number of attempts required to demonstrate mastery were assessed. Despite previous use of pMDIs by most patients, Pulmicort Turbuhaler was significantly preferred (p < 0.001) and required significantly less time to master than pMDIs (p < 0.001). Median times to device mastery were 3.67 min for Pulmicort Turbuhaler versus 5.33 min for pMDIs. Patients rated Pulmicort Turbuhaler significantly better than pMDIs on PDEA ease of use (p = 0.0005) and overall satisfaction (p < 0.0001) single-item scales and all four multi-item scales (pharyngeal symptoms, oral sensation, operational use, and inhaler attributes; p < 0.05). Overall, patients preferred Pulmicort Turbuhaler over pMDIs and required less time to be taught how to correctly use Turbuhaler trade mark.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2002

Pressurised metered-dose inhalers versus all other hand-held inhalers devices to deliver bronchodilators for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: Bronchodilator therapy for COPD may be delivered by a number of different inhaler devices. OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of pressurised metered dose inhalers (pMDI) compared to any other handheld inhaler device for the delivery of bronchodilators in non-acute COPD. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Collaboration, Asthma and Wheeze Randomised Controlled Clinical Trials register was searched for studies. The UK pharmaceutical companies who manufacture inhaled COPD medication were also contacted. SELECTION CRITERIA: Two reviewers independently reviewed the results of computerised search and any potentially relevant articles were obtained in full. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: One reviewer extracted details of each trial and a second reviewer checked all extracted data. Dichotomous outcomes such as exacerbation rate were assessed using relative risk, with 95% confidence interval (CI). MAIN RESULTS: Fourteen studies appeared potentially relevant but only three studies (61 patients) met the entry criteria. Two studies compared a dry powder device (Turbuhaler or Rotahaler) with a pMDI for beta2-agonist delivery, and one (36 patients cross-over design) the Respimat (soft mist device for ipratropium) vs a pMDI. For the Turbuhaler and Rotahaler, none of the reported outcome measures were significantly different. The Rotahaler study used a high and low dose of medication with or without large volume spacer. The study using the Respimat showed significant increases in FEV1 when compared to a pMDI (difference in change from base line 70 ml, 95% CI 10, 130 ml). The effect on change in FVC was of similar size. There were no differences between these two devices for any other reported outcomes. Although none of the included studies required prior patient ability to use any of the inhalers (and no study mentioned device training), it was assumed that all patients randomised into the study would have undergone training in use of the study inhalers and were capable of using those devices. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: In patients with stable COPD, pMDI produced similar outcomes to a dry powder device for delivering beta2-agonists, but the very small number of studies and included patients does not permit firm conclusions to be drawn. The soft mist device for ipratropium was more effective than a pMDI, but the data come from one small study. There need to be further well designed randomised controlled trials to define the role of inhaler devices using bronchodilators in stable COPD.

Adrenergic Agonists↗
PubMed1999

The technology of metered-dose inhalers and treatment costs in asthma: a retrospective study of breath actuation versus traditional press-and-breathe inhalers.

This paper reviews the impact of the use of technologically dissimilar beta-agonist aerosols--the Maxair Autohaler (pirbuterol acetate) breath-actuated aerosol and the traditional albuterol press-and-breathe inhaler-on the treatment costs of asthma. If, as clinical evidence would suggest, the breath-actuated aerosol is not only as effective as an albuterol inhaler with a spacer, but is easier to use and results in more optimal beta-agonist use by patients, then one might consider the hypothesis that patients possessing a breath-actuated inhaler would, ceteris paribus, experience lower asthma-related treatment costs-principally, those medical costs associated with fewer emergency room visits and hospitalizations. This hypothesis is considered from the perspective of a retrospective claims database study of patients who used one or the other beta-agonist inhaler exclusively. At the descriptive level, costs of treatment for patients using the press-and-breathe inhaler are estimated to be 16.5% greater than costs for patients using the breath-actuated inhaler. In the multivariate analysis, the presence of the breath-actuated inhaler (in a dummy variable analysis) was not only statistically significant (P < 0.05), but entered with the expected negative sign. Estimated cost impacts under various model specifications are consistent with the magnitude of the cost differences reported in the descriptive analysis. Total cost savings with the Maxair Autohaler ranged from 8.7% to 11.7%, with medical cost savings estimated at 14.6%.

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗
PubMed2000

Inertial sizing of aerosol inhaled from two dry powder inhalers with realistic breath patterns versus constant flow rates.

A procedure is developed that allows particles inhaled with realistic breath patterns to be sized by cascade impaction at a constant flow rate. This procedure is then used to examine the difference between particle sizes obtained with constant flow rate (step profile) versus actual-subject breath patterns for two dry powder inhalers DPIs: the Ventodisk and Spiros inhalers (delivering salbutamol sulphate). Aerosol inhaled from the DPIs by a breath simulator was combined with make-up air to provide 300 l/min. to a pair of virtual impactors. These impactors separate out particles in the nominal diameter range of 1-10 microm for sizing at 30 l/min. by a MOUDI cascade impactor, with filter collection of particles outside this range. Breathing patterns of ten subjects ranging in age from 6 to 17 years of age were measured and recorded using whole-body plethysmography while these volunteers inhaled through Ventodisk and Spiros inhalers. Particle sizes with four of these breath patterns, as well as several constant flow rate step profiles, were then obtained using the sizing apparatus with a realistic mouth throat intake. Our results show that as long as the constant flow rates were near typical values occurring in the actual-subject breaths, particle sizes obtained with constant flow rates were not significantly different (P > 0.01) from those occurring with actual-subject breath patterns. Significant differences are present if constant flow rates unrepresentative of those expected during particle uptake with the actual-subject patterns are used with the Ventodisk. These results show that judiciously chosen constant flow rates give rise to inertial particle size measurements that are equivalent to those obtained during actual-subject inhalation for the two types of DPIs tested.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Safety and efficacy of a high cumulative dose of salbutamol inhaled via Turbuhaler or via a pressurized metered-dose inhaler in patients with asthma.

An open, crossover and randomized study was carried out to compare the safety and efficacy of salbutamol inhaled using the dry-powder inhaler Turbuhaler, and using a pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI). Twelve patients with moderate to severe asthma, aged 47-68 years, were included in the study. On two separate days, patients received a total dose of 1600 micrograms of salbutamol administered in a cumulative dose fashion: 100, 100, 200, 400 and 800 micrograms at 3-min intervals. Salbutamol inhaled via Turbuhaler caused a larger decrease in serum potassium concentration than did salbutamol inhaled via pMDI. The estimated relative dose potency of the hypokalaemic effect of salbutamol Turbuhaler vs salbutamol pMDI was 2.0 with a 95% confidence interval of 1.3-3.6. Turbuhaler caused a small (but statistically significantly greater than with pMDI) increase in heart rate, QTc interval and tremor. Blood pressure was unaffected by the treatments. No adverse events of clinical relevance were reported. The estimated relative dose potency of the bronchodilating effect (FEV1) of salbutamol Turbuhaler vs salbutamol pMDI was 3.0 with a 95% confidence interval of 1.8-5.8. In conclusion, salbutamol inhaled via Turbuhaler was more potent and seemed to have a better therapeutic ratio than salbutamol inhaled via pMDI. Both treatments were equally well tolerated.

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗
PubMed2001

Clinical equivalence of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate in combination (50/100 microg twice daily) when administered via a chlorofluorocarbon-free metered dose inhaler or dry powder inhaler to patients with mild-to-moderate asthma.

This multi-centre, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study was designed to investigate the hypothesis of equivalent efficacy and comparable safety of two inhaled presentations of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination product (SALM/FP) 50/100 microg administered twice daily to patients with mild-to-moderate asthma for 12 weeks. The delivery systems were a 25/50 microg strength hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered-dose inhaler (MDI) and a Diskus inhaler (50/100 microg strength). A third group received FP 100 microg twice daily via a chlorofluorocarbon MDI (50 microg strength). A total of 497 patients aged 11-79 years with reversible airways obstruction who were symptomatic on inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy and had room for improvement in lung function were randomized to treatment in a double-blind, parallel-group design (SALM/FP MDI: n=165; SALM/FP Diskus: n=167; FP MDI: n=165) for 12 weeks. A total of 383 patients completed the study according to the protocol. According to the primary efficacy variable, increase in mean morning PEF over weeks 1-12, the two inhaled presentations of SALM/FP were clinically equivalent (adjusted mean increases 43 and 46 l min(-1); treatment difference 3 l min(-1); 95% confidence interval: -6 to 11 l min(-1)). Equivalence was also demonstrated by all secondary efficacy measures. The SALM/FP MDI was significantly superior to the FP MDI for increase in mean morning PEF (treatment difference 19 l min(-1); P<0.001) and for all secondary measures except FEV1 and symptom-free nights. There was no significant difference between the groups with respect to adverse events and serum cortisol levels. These results demonstrate that the SALM/FP 25/50 microg HFA MDI (two inhalations twice daily) is clinically equivalent to the SALM/FP 50/100 microg Diskus (one inhalation twice daily). Patients switching to SALM/FP from other MDI-based asthma treatments may now do so without a change of delivery device.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

In vitro comparison of salbutamol hydrofluoroalkane (Airomir) metered dose inhaler aerosols inhaled during pediatric tidal breathing from five valved holding chambers.

Amounts of salbutamol delivered from chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-free metered dose inhalers (MDIs) (Airomir; 3M, St. Paul, MN) in particle sizes appropriate for inhalational treatment with five common holding chambers (NES [or Nebuchamber] spacer [Astra Draco AB, Lund, Sweden], AeroChamber [Trudell Medical, London, Ontario, Canada], OptiChamber [Health-scan Products, Cedar Grove, NJ], Vent170 spacer [Nordac Design, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada], and E-Z Spacer [WE Pharmaceuticals, Ramona, CA]) when used under simulated pediatric tidal breathing conditions were determined. Five devices of each type were tested with Airomir hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) inhalers (100 micrograms of salbutamol). Each device was connected to face replicas representative of 7-month-old (infant) and 2-year-old (toddler) children, and aerosol was also inhaled into an Andersen cascade impactor (Graseby Andersen, Smyrna, GA) using a valve system and simulated tidal breathing patterns representative of children of these ages. Amounts of drug inhaled in fine particles with the HFA formulation are significantly less (up to 46% less) with the E-Z Spacer (P < 0.01) compared with amounts inhaled in previous studies with the CFC formulation but are nearly the same with other holding chamber types (e.g., differing by < 6% for the AeroChamber). With the HFA formulation, the metal NES spacer delivered significantly more salbutamol in fine particles (P < 0.01) than any of the other holding chambers. Amounts of salbutamol inhaled in fine particles during pediatric tidal breathing from valved holding chambers with Airomir varies considerably between holding chamber types.

Aerosols↗
PubMed1983

Nasal inhalation as a cause of inefficient pulmonal aerosol inhalation technique in children.

In order to evaluate whether children can be taught the efficient use of a pressurized terbutaline aerosol with a tube spacer 71 children were given careful instruction in aerosol inhalation technique according to the manufacturer's instructions. Inhalation technique was assessed as being efficient when a child achieved an increase of more than 19% in FEV1 10 min after taking two puffs of terbutaline (each puff = 0.25 mg). After instruction about 37% of children aged 5-7 years and about 80% of children over 7 years were efficient in inhalation technique. Inhalation through the nose after actuation into the mouth accounted for about 50% of treatment failures, with the problem being more frequent in the younger age group. When this error was corrected about 83% of the children were efficient in the technique. Coordination problems and too rapid inspiration after actuation were also common errors. The findings stress the importance of checking all children's inhalation technique before prescribing inhalation therapy. Careful instruction was not enough. The possibility of nasal inhaling should be borne in mind when looking for causes of treatment failure.

Administration, Intranasal↗
PubMed2001

Peak inspiratory flow rate and slope of the inhalation profiles in dry powder inhalers.

Aerosol delivery depends on device design and inhalation technique. In vitro device evaluations have shown that the emitted dose and fine particle mass of dry powder inhalers (DPIs) increase at high peak inspiratory flow rates (PIFR). Since the PIFR is mostly achieved after the release of the powder, slope of the pressure profile is also described as an important determinant. The aim of the present study was to assess whether the PIFR while using Diskus it and Turbuhaler it inhalers could be used to predict the slope of the inhalation pressure profile. In a group of 10 stable asthma patients and three groups (mild, moderate and severe) of 16 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients, lung function was measured, and for each device, 18 inhalation profiles were recorded with the inhalation profile recorder during six sessions over 10 weeks. The values for the pressure slope and PIFR of both Diskus and Turbuhaler, were significantly correlated. The r-values were 0.865 and 0.882, respectively (p<0.01). Percentage explained variance was 74.8% for Diskus and 77.8% for Turbuhaler. Significant correlations were found between peak inspiratory flow rates and slopes. It has been shown for two different dry powder inhalers that peak inspiratory flow rate and slope correlate well in a wide range of patient groups.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Is oral theophylline effective in combination with both inhaled anticholinergic agent and inhaled beta 2-agonist in the treatment of stable COPD?

To investigate the additive effect of oral theophylline on combined inhaled anticholinergic agent and beta 2-agonist therapy, 12 patients with stable COPD (64.6 +/- 5.9 years) completed a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled crossover trial of oral theophylline for a 4-week period (400 mg for 2 weeks, followed by 600 mg for 2 weeks). All of the patients continued to inhale both salbutamol, 200 micrograms, and ipratropium bromide, 40 micrograms, using a metered-dose inhaler four times a day. Spirometry was assessed before, and 15 and 60 min after the inhalation of bronchodilators at 2-week intervals. Even after the inhalation of salbutamol and ipratropium, theophylline significantly improved FEV1 and daily peak expiratory flow rate compared with the placebo. No significant improvement in the daily symptom scores for cough, sputum, wheezing, or shortness of breath was observed throughout the different phases of treatment. This study shows that the additive bronchodilating effect of theophylline, when used in combination with salbutamol, 200 micrograms, and ipratropium, 40 micrograms, is significant but small in stable COPD. The addition of theophylline did not significantly improve the patient's symptoms. Oral theophylline, when used in combination with an inhaled anticholinergic agent and an inhaled beta 2-agonist, may be of limited value in the treatment of stable COPD.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1979

[Experimental studies of long-term aerosol inhalation. An inhalation apparatus for long-term exposure with concentration regulation facilities (author's transl)].

A "multipurpose" inhalation system for long-term experiments was developed to study health effects of the exposure to various kinds of aerosols appearing in general working environments as well as in the ambient atmosphere. In order to carry out a continuous inhalation study on animals for their life-span, at least two essential conditions should continuously be fulfilled. (1) Steady maintenance of the appropriate sanitary conditions for the animals placed in the inhalation box. (2) Constant feeding of aerosol at an appropriately regulated concentration level. The developed system described in the present paper has been proved to be satisfactory from the above viewpoints. This inhalation system was applied to an experimental study attempting to simulate the polluted lungs in the urban dwellers. Heavy oil combustion products were chosen as the inhalation material, which were made to be inhaled by the male rats of SD-JCL strain for their life-span. The present report is mainly concerned with the construction of the inhalation system including a newly devised regulation facility of the aerosol concentration. Operating characteristics and actual data obtained are described. Details of the exposure conditions and pathological findings obtained will be described in the succeeding reports.

Aerosols↗