Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Infertility”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 163 records · Page 9Linked to original sources

Hidden costs of infertility treatment in employee health benefits plans.

OBJECTIVES: Many employers exclude infertility treatment from coverage under their health benefits plans. However, infertility treatment is often provided under other diagnoses or in association with therapy rendered for other disease processes. This study attempted to estimate those hidden costs and to determine what the impact would be of providing coverage for infertility treatment. STUDY DESIGN: A 1-year retrospective analysis was carried out to isolate the hidden costs of infertility treatment from specific medical claims data gathered from a large representative employer with no infertility benefit provided. Data were analyzed in the context of the claims experience of a health plan covering approximately 28,000 employees. Infertility treatment was excluded under this plan. Medical claims for specific procedures and diagnoses in 1996 were analyzed by using Current Procedural Terminology codes in conjunction with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes to estimate the hidden costs of infertility treatment. Forty-one Current Procedural Terminology codes and 68 International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes were used for the analysis. Clinical practice experience was used to set boundaries (conservative and moderate estimate) regarding the likelihood of a given treatment being associated with infertility. This was compared with 100% covered charges to generate claims per employee per month. Procedures covered operative, diagnostic, and laboratory services. These figures were used to compute a range of cost for infertility treatment per member per month. RESULTS: Forty-one Current Procedural Terminology codes were identified that indicated possible infertility treatment. These covered the areas of laparoscopic and hysteroscopic surgery, lysis of adhesions, neosalpingostomy, cyst drainage, oocyte retrieval or embryo transfer, echography, and various hormonal analyses. Sixty-eight International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes indicated the possibility of infertility treatment. These included endocrine disorders, various uterine pathologic conditions, pelvic pain, endometriosis, pregnancy loss, irregular menses, and various ovulatory dysfunctions. The retrospective analysis found that 35 Current Procedural Terminology codes were involved in claims highly indicative of infertility services, such as 56353, hysteroscopic division of uterine septum, and 58345, transcervical fallopian tube catheterization. According to the 35 Current Procedural Terminology codes, $603,807.95 would have been paid if 100% of the charges had been covered; this would have resulted in a claim per employee per month of $1.12 by conservative estimate to $0.60 by moderate estimate. Computed cost figures per member per month showed the hidden costs of infertility to range between $0.27 and $0.50. CONCLUSION: On the basis of various cost studies, rate filings, and employee data, the cost of providing coverage for infertility treatment has previously been shown to vary between $0.20 and $2.00 per member per month. Through appropriate cost sharing, managed care, and algorithms, infertility coverage can be offered at a cost of $0.40 to $0.50 per member per month. This analysis indicates that at least some employers already pay this much even when infertility is specifically excluded under the plan.

Adult↗

Primary and secondary infertility in sub-Saharan Africa.

BACKGROUND: No previous study has provided national estimates of the prevalence of primary and secondary infertility in sizeable areas of sub-Saharan Africa. METHODS: Primary infertility is measured by the proportion childless among women who entered their first marriage at least 7 years before date of censoring. Secondary infertility is measured by the 'subsequently infertile estimator' from parous ever-married women. Exposure begins at the age of the woman at the birth of her first child, and exposure ends when the woman is of an age, which is 5 years lower than her age at censoring. These last 5 years are used to determine her status as infertile or fertile at the last observation 5 years before censoring. A woman is considered infertile at last observation if she has had no livebirths during the last 5 years before censoring, otherwise she is considered fertile. A woman who has not given birth at age a or later is defined as being 'infertile subsequent to age a'. The index of the proportion subsequently infertile at age a is estimated as the number of women infertile subsequent to age a, divided by the total number of women observed at that age. Infertility is estimated for women age 20-44. RESULTS: Primary infertility is relatively low and it exceeds 3% in less than a third of the 28 African countries analysed. In contrast, elevated levels of secondary infertility prevail in most countries. Secondary infertility for women age 20-44 ranges from 5% in Togo to 23% in Central African Republic. CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to gauge national levels of primary and secondary infertility from population based surveys including a birth history. The prevalence of infertility of pathological origin is so high in sub-Saharan Africa that infertility is not merely an individual concern, it is a public health problem.

Adolescent↗

[Statistics on the diagnosis and treatment of infertile patients--psychologic examination and analysis of the questionnaire].

Authors present the statistics of the diagnosis and treatment of infertile patients who visited the outpatient clinic of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan throughout 1985. The number of primary infertility (78) was greater than that of secondary infertility (63). The average age and the duration of infertility were 30.5 y. old/3.86 y. (primary) and 31.6 y. old/3.59 y. (secondary), respectively. The most frequent cause of infertility was ovarian-endocrine factor both in primary and secondary infertilities. The second cause was the male factor in primary infertility in spite of the idiopathic factor in secondary infertility. Tubal disorder as a cause was relatively few in both infertilities. So-called open laparoscopy was performed on 11 patients, with little hope of cure. In eight of these patients, disorders of tubal patency and endometriosis, which were not found by hysterosalpingography and hydrotubation before laparoscopy, were discovered for the first time. In twenty pregnancies at the day of statistics, the number of secondary infertility (13) was greater than that of primary infertility (7). All pregnant cases were under 35 years of age and under 5-year of infertility duration at the initial visit to our outpatient clinic. The number 1 cause of infertility was ovarian-endocrine factor. In eight pregnant cases, hysterosalpingography was performed in the same or one cycle before the pregnant cycle. According to the summation of the questionnaire of 65 infertile patients, most of infertile patients were affirmative to in-vitro-fertilization and embryo transfer. Depressive and neurotic tendencies were not remarkable at that time by Self-Rating-Depression Scale (SDS) and Cornell Medical Index (CMI) in 42 infertile patients.

Adult↗

In vitro fertilization/embryo transfer in unexplained infertility and minimal peritoneal endometriosis.

BACKGROUND: To compare the outcome of in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer (IVF-ET) in unexplained infertility and infertility associated with minimal peritoneal endometriosis. METHODS: A retrospective analysis comparing results of stimulation, sperm characteristics, cleavage, implantation and pregnancy rates in patients with unexplained infertility and peritoneal endometriosis associated infertility. Couples with tubal infertility constituted a control group. RESULTS: In the unexplained infertility and endometriosis groups similar response to stimulation, similar sperm characteristics and cleavage rates were observed. Compared with tubal infertility lower sperm motility was seen in the unexplained infertility group. Both non tubal infertility groups had lower cleavage rate than was seen in the control group. No differences in pregnancy rate were observed, but a significantly higher implantation rate was seen in unexplained infertility compared with tubal infertility. CONCLUSIONS: Couples with unexplained infertility and infertility associated with minimal peritoneal endometriosis have similar outcomes in an IVF-ET set up. Significantly lower cleavage rates in these groups compared with tubal infertility indicate gamete defects as possible causes of infertility.

Adult↗

The presence of serum antibody to the chlamydial heat shock protein (CHSP60) as a diagnostic test for tubal factor infertility.

OBJECTIVE: To study the utility of testing for heat shock protein 60 (CHSP60) antibodies in the diagnosis of tubal factor infertility. DESIGN: Prospective case control. SETTING: Canadian university hospital infertility clinic. PATIENT(S): Women presenting for infertility investigation. INTERVENTION(S): Sera were collected from 77 patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The relationship between tubal factor infertility and the presence of antibodies to Chlamydia trachomatis and CHSP60 was assessed. RESULT(S): There were no significant differences between antibodies to C. trachomatis in women with tubal factor infertility (63%) and other causes of infertility (46%). However, more women with tubal factor infertility (44%) had anti-CHSP60 antibodies compared with other causes of infertility (8%). Antibody testing for C. trachomatis has only a 63% sensitivity and a 54% specificity for detecting tubal factor infertility. In contrast, the CHSP60 antibody test has a 44% sensitivity and a 92% specificity for detecting tubal factor infertility. There is a good positive likelihood ratio of 5.5 for CHSP60 antibody testing detecting the presence of tubal factor infertility. Combining CHSP60 antibody with antibody testing for C. trachomatis has an excellent positive likelihood ratio of 10 for the detection of C. trachomatis-associated tubal factor infertility. CONCLUSION(S): CHSP60 antibody testing is a more accurate test than antibody testing for C. trachomatis for predicting chlamydia-associated tubal factor infertility. These tests, when used in combination at initial infertility evaluation, would provide a rapid noninterventive means of diagnosing tubal factor infertility.

Adult↗

Epidemiologic and etiologic aspects of primary infertility in the Kashmir region of India.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the magnitude of primary infertility and to study its etiologic aspects in India. DESIGN: After proper randomization, 10,063 married couples were interviewed to ascertain the prevalence of primary infertility. A definitive protocol was followed to determine the etiology of primary infertility in 250 consecutive couples. SETTING: Tertiary care medical center in the Kashmir valley of India. PATIENT(S): Couples married for > or = 1 year; 250 consecutive couples attending an endocrine clinic for primary infertility. INTERVENTION(S): A logical investigative protocol was followed to identify the etiology of infertility. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Magnitude of primary infertility in the community as well as the male, female, or combined etiology of infertility. RESULT(S): Fifteen percent of the couples interviewed had primary infertility, among whom 4.66% had unresolved infertility at the time of the survey. The etiology of infertility in 250 consecutive couples revealed a female factor in 57.6%, a male factor in 22.4%, combined factors in 5.2%, and an undetermined cause in 14.8%. CONCLUSION(S): Primary infertility is as common and distressing a problem in India as in other parts of the world. Semen abnormalities (22.4%), anovulation (17.2%), ovarian failure (8.8%), hyperprolactinemia (8.4%) and tubal disease (7.2%) are common causes of infertility. The pattern of infertility in India is the same as in other parts of the world, except that infertile couples report late for evaluation.

Adult↗

Infertility in central Africa.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence and risk factors of primary and secondary infertility in the four Central African countries of Cameroon, Chad, Central African Republic and Gabon. METHODS: Primary infertility was approximated by the percentage of women childless after at least 5 years of marriage. The percentage with no birth at least 5 years subsequent to a previous birth was considered to have secondary infertility. Logistic regression and discrete logistic regression models were estimated to determine the risk factors of primary and secondary infertility, respectively. The relatively few women who were defined as infertile and reported using a traditional or modern method of contraception at survey date were considered fertile to reduce bias from falsely classifying effective contraceptive users as infertile. RESULTS: The prevalence of infertility was highest in Central African Republic and lowest in Chad: primary infertility ranged from 6.9% to 3.1% and secondary infertility for women aged 20-44 years ranged from 26.5% to 18.9%. Women married more than once vs. only once and formerly married women vs. women living with their husbands had higher odds of primary and secondary infertility. Also, younger cohorts had relatively higher risks of primary (born after 1970) and secondary infertility (born after 1960) compared with women born before 1960. In contrast, place of residence, religion, education of wife or husband and socio-economic status were generally not associated with primary or secondary infertility. CONCLUSIONS: Infertility is still prevalent in Central Africa and new interventions aimed at reducing the incidence and social implications of pathologic infertility are needed.

Adolescent↗

Immunological factors in endometriosis-associated reproductive failure: studies in fertile and infertile women with and without endometriosis.

Immunopathophysiological mechanisms in endometriosis-associated reproductive failure were studied in appropriate populations: infertile and fertile women with and without endometriosis. The incidence of sera positive for any of the autoantibodies tested among infertile women with endometriosis (n = 25) was similar to that observed in the three control groups [unexplained infertility patients (n = 25) and fertile women with (n = 10) and without (n = 25) endometriosis]. The mean volume of peritoneal fluid was significantly elevated in women with endometriosis (both fertile and infertile) as compared with patients without endometriosis (fertile or infertile). The concentration of peritoneal fluid leukocytes and the percentage of cells positive for macrophage markers were significantly increased and the percentage of T lymphocytes significantly decreased in infertile women with endometriosis but not in patients with unexplained infertility and fertile women with endometriosis, as compared with fertile controls without endometriosis. Macrophages from infertile patients with endometriosis had higher sperm phagocytosis than did those from infertile women without endometriosis or fertile subjects with or without endometriosis. Incidences of serum and peritoneal fluid samples embryotoxic to the in-vitro development of 2-cell mouse embryos were significantly higher in infertile patients with endometriosis than in unexplained infertility patients and fertile women with or without endometriosis. It is concluded that immunological mechanisms of endometriosis-associated infertility exist but that these peritoneal immunological factors in infertile women with endometriosis are related to their subfertility rather than to the presence of ectopic endometrial implants. This is supported by the lack of immunological abnormalities observed among fertile women with endometriosis. These immunological abnormalities are lacking in patients with unexplained infertility.

Adult↗

Research on infertility: definition makes a difference. The Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study Group.

Although different definitions of infertility are used, research findings based on various definitions have not been systematically compared. To contrast the impact of five definitions of infertility on research findings, the authors analyzed data from the control group (randomly selected US women aged 20-54 years) of the Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study (1980-1983). For all definitions, an absence of recognized conception was the outcome of interest. Specifically, the authors examined the effect of various definitions of infertility on demographic characteristics of women classified as infertile, prevalence of a history of infertility, age at infertility classification, and cumulative incidence of conception after infertility classification. Results indicated that women classified as infertile by definitions based on unprotected intercourse for 12 months and unprotected intercourse for 24 months were more likely to be black, less educated, and classified as infertile at younger or older ages that women classified by alternative definitions. The prevalence of a history of infertility ranged from 6.1% (physician diagnosis) to 32.6% (unprotected intercourse for 12 months). For the definitions based on unprotected intercourse for 12/24 months and for physician diagnosis, the cumulative incidence of conception by greater than 120 months after infertility classification was 86.3%, 76.7%, and 75.4%, respectively. The authors conclude that the definition of infertility has an impact on research findings related to which and how many women are classified as infertile, the age at infertility classification, and the probability of future conception.

Adult↗

Cost-effectiveness of gamete intrafallopian transfer in comparison with induction of ovulation with gonadotropins in the treatment of female infertility: a clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the cost-effectiveness of gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT) with that of conventional infertility treatment in couples with female infertility, excluding tubal factors. DESIGN: Patients were randomly divided in two groups: receiving GIFT or conventional infertility treatment. For a period of 2 years, GIFT was compared with conventional infertility treatment in couples with endometriosis, anovulation, idiopathic infertility, cervical mucus factor, female immunologic factor, or multifactorial causes of infertility in a randomized clinical trial. SETTING: The study was performed in the Unit for Human Reproduction, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of the Orange Free State, Bloemfontein, Republic of South Africa. PATIENTS: One hundred seventy-four successive couples with female infertility were selected for the study. All couples were from the higher socioeconomic bracket. INTERVENTIONS: One group received GIFT and the other received conventional infertility treatment consisting of induction of ovulation with gonadotropins followed by intrauterine artificial insemination or normal intercourse. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The results were stratified according to the specific cause of infertility. Outcome was measured by the success rate per treatment cycle, as well as the cost per pregnancy. RESULTS: Overall, GIFT proved to be successful in 26.7% of treatment cycles compared with 9.7% with conventional therapy. CONCLUSIONS: After careful analysis, the authors came to the conclusion that GIFT is more cost-effective than conventional infertility treatment in patients with endometriosis and anovulation. In patients with idiopathic infertility, immunologic infertility, a cervical mucus factor, and multifactorial infertility, induction of ovulation followed by intrauterine artificial insemination or normal intercourse proved to be more cost-effective.

Coitus↗

Assessment of separate contributions to perinatal mortality of infertility history and treatment: a case-control analysis.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have described the perinatal risks associated with infertility, other than for infertility treated by in-vitro fertilisation or gamete intrafallopian transfer. The aim of this analysis was to estimate the risks of perinatal death associated with treated and untreated infertility. METHODS: A population-based case-control study of perinatal deaths was carried out in Leicestershire Health District over the period 1990-94, during which 60,922 babies were delivered. Of these, 567 perinatal deaths were associated with 542 women. 972 mothers were randomly selected as controls. Medical, obstetric, and social data were collected for cases and controls from the medical notes and interviews with the women. The relative risks of perinatal death associated with treated and untreated infertility before the index pregnancy were estimated as odds ratios by means of unconditional logistic regression analysis. FINDINGS: 65 (10%) of cases and 34 (3.5%) of the controls had infertility before the index pregnancy. History of infertility in the index pregnancy, irrespective of treatment, increased the risk of perinatal death (odds ratio 2.9 [95% CI 1.8-4.5]). The population attributable risk fraction for perinatal death related to infertility was 6.2% (3.4-9.0). 45 (54%) of the deaths, even in the untreated group, were associated with immaturity. Compared with women without infertility, women with untreated infertility were at increased risk of perinatal death (3.3 [1.6-6.8]). The risk of perinatal death associated with multiple births did not explain this finding. Similarly, treated infertility also increased the risk of perinatal death (2.7 [1.5-4.7]); the risks associated with multiple births explained some, but not all, of this excess. In Leicestershire, the overall underlying risk of a mother experiencing at least one perinatal death over the study was 9.0 per 1000 women. For women who experience infertility, this risk increases by about 18 per 1000 (6-30). INTERPRETATION: Counselling for women before any form of infertility treatment should include discussion of the risks of perinatal death. Our results would benefit from confirmation. However, we advocate that at antenatal booking a history of infertility, irrespective of treatment, should be sought, because these women have a significantly increased risk of perinatal death, particularly associated with prematurity.

Adult↗

Low plasma testosterone in varicocele patients with impotence and male infertility.

To study the affect of bilateral varicocele (grade 3) on impotence and male infertility patients, 29 patients were selected from an outpatient clinic during 15 May 1998 to 15 August 1999 (the mean age was 33.9 +/- 6.3), 15 patients complaining of erectile dysfunction and 14 patients complaining of male infertility. The mean duration of impotence was 3 +/- 2.3 years and for male infertility was 6 +/- 2.5. All organic and psychogenic causes related to impotence and male infertility except bilateral varicocele (grade 3) and low plasma testosterone were excluded by clinical and laboratory investigations. Twenty males with normal erection and fertility were included as controls. Detailed medical history and complete physical examination included measurement of testicular size by orchiometer; semen and hormonal parameters were measured for all patients and control. In impotent patients left and right testicular volume was significantly decreased (p < .05), while in male infertility patients left and right testicular volume was highly significantly and, significantly decreased (p < .005, p < .05) compared to controls. In male infertility patients, left testicular volume was highly significantly decreased compared to impotent patients (p < .005). The sperm count and semen volume in impotent patients was significantly decreased (p < .05, p < .01), but no significant differences were found in sperm motility and abnormal forms, while in male infertility the sperm count was highly significantly decreased (p < .005), the sperm motility was significantly decreased (p < .05), the abnormal form was significantly increased (p) < .05), but in the semen volume there was no significant difference compared to controls. In impotent patients the sperm count was significantly increased and abnormal form was significantly decreased compared to male infertility (p < .05). The mean serum testosterone was significantly decreased in impotent patients (p < .01), and highly significantly decreased in male infertility (p < .005) compared to controls. The mean serum FSH was significantly increased in male infertility (p < .05) and nonsignificant in impotent patients compared to controls. The mean serum LH and prolactin levels were nonsignificant in both impotent and male infertility patients compared to controls, but LH was significantly increased in impotence compared to male infertility patients (p < .025). Therefore, bilateral varicocele (grade 3) is associated with significant reduction in testicular function with significant increase in serum levels of FSH and LH, which may cause erectile dysfunction and male infertility.

Adult↗

Pretreatment Beck Depression Inventory score is an important predictor for post-treatment score in infertile patients: a before-after study.

BACKGROUND: The experience of infertility can be extremely stressful. Some of the risk factors for depression in infertility are being female, repeated unsuccessful treatment cycles or a 2 to 3 year history of infertility, low socioeconomic status, foreign nationality, lack of partner support, life events and previous depression. In this study, we analyzed the Beck Depression Inventory score at the beginning and the end of infertility treatment, to determine which factors may influence the BDI score after treatment of infertility. METHODS: In a before-after study, in a university-affiliated teaching hospital, 251 women who had been visited for assisted reproductive technology infertility treatment participated in the study. BDI score was assessed before and after treatment of infertility. RESULTS: The mean BDI score rose after unsuccessful treatment and dropped after successful treatment. Those with lower education levels had a higher BDI score before treatment. BDI score after treatment was positively correlated with pretreatment BDI scoreand duration of infertility. CONCLUSION: BDI score after treatment was strongly connected to the BDI score before treatment, the result of therapy and to the duration of infertility. The influence of duration of infertility on BDI score after treatment of infertility is weak. So a simple method to screen patients at risk of depression after infertility treatment is determining pretreatment BDI score and predicting the result of infertility treatment by other risk factors.

Adult↗

Clinical patterns and major causes of infertility in Mongolia.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical patterns and major causes of infertility in Mongolia, based on the clinical and laboratory findings of both partners, and to compare the findings with data from the published World Health Organization (WHO) multicenter study. METHODS: Four hundred and thirty infertile couples who attended the Infertility Clinic of the State Research Center on Maternal Child Health in 1998-2002 were included in the study. The couples had not had a viable birth after at least 1 year of unprotected intercourse and agreed to be fully investigated according to the WHO protocol 'Standardized Investigation of the Infertile Couple'. RESULTS: The mean duration of infertility of couples was 4.9 +/- 0.2 years. 43.7% of women had secondary infertility. In the females, the prevalence of past history of sexually transmitted infection (STI) and pelvic inflammatory disease were 33.5% and 25.1%, respectively. In the male partner, 44.2% reported a history of STI and 27.7% had previous testicular damage. 32.8% of women had a tubal factor. The most common causes of male infertility were obstructive azoospermia (8.4%), male accessory gland infection (6.7%) and acquired testicular damage (5.4%). In 45.8% of couples, infertility was due to a female factor and in 25.6% of cases, infertility was due to a male factor. 9.8% of couples had no demonstrable cause in either partner and 18.8% of couples had an infertility diagnosis in both partners. CONCLUSION: Patterns of female infertility did not differ significantly from those in the WHO study. Male infertility had a unique pattern, as there was a high prevalence of obstructive azoospermia and previous testicular damage.

Adult↗

Estimation of the prevalence and causes of infertility in western Siberia.

The study examined the epidemiology and causes of infertility in Tomsk, Western Siberia, using methodological approaches recommended by WHO and was based on the findings for a randomly selected sample of 2000 married women aged 18-45 years. Among the respondents, 333 couples were considered infertile since they had not conceived after 12 months or more of unprotected intercourse. This group of infertile couples was offered comprehensive clinical investigations but only 186 couples completed them. The infertility rate in Tomsk was 16.7%, being caused by diseases of the female reproduction system in 52.7% of the couples and by male reproductive diseases in 6.4%. In 38.7% of couples, both spouses suffered from infertility, while in 2.2% of cases the cause of infertility was not determined. Among the causes of female infertility, secondary infertility dominated (12.9% of all the women questioned), while primary infertility affected 3.8% of the women. The most frequent causes of female infertility were disturbances to tubal patency (36.5%) and pelvic adhesions (23.6%). Endocrine pathology was found in 32.8% of cases. The most frequent cause of male infertility was inflammatory disease of male accessory glands (12.9%). In 8.6% of cases infection resulted in obstructive azoospermia. Varicocele was registered in 11.3% of cases, and idiopathic pathospermia in 20.9%. Inflammatory complications among females were 4.2 times more frequent than among males.

Adolescent↗

Improvement of sexual activity, pregnancy rate, and low plasma testosterone after bilateral varicocelectomy in impotence and male infertility patients.

To evaluate the effects of bilateral varicocelectomy on sexual activity, testicular volumes, semen quality, and serum hormone levels in impotence and male infertility patients, 48 patients were studied from an outpatient clinic from May 1998 to March 2001. The mean age was 37+/-5.9; 16 patients were complaining of erectile dysfunction and 32 patients were complaining of male infertility. The mean duration of impotence was 3.3+/-2.4 years and for male infertility was 3.8+/-3.2 years. Sexual and reproductive history was taken for erectile dysfunction and male infertility patients. General, local examination, and laboratory investigations were done for all patients. Preoperative and postoperative testicular volumes; semen parameters, including semen volume, sperm count, and motility; and morphology and hormonal parameters, including LH and FSH, and testosterone levels were measured. All patients were followed up for 3-36 months after varicocele repair. Left and right testicular volume was improved in impotence and male infertility patients and fertility groups, but this improvement was not statistically significant (p>.25). The semen volume was significantly increased in male infertility patients and fertility group (p<.05), but there was no statistical significant difference in impotent patients (p>.25). The sperm count was improved in male infertility patients and fertility group, but this improvement was not statistically significant (p>.25), and in impotent patients there was no significant difference (p>.40). The sperm motility was very significantly increased in male infertility patients and the fertility group (p<.0005), and highly significantly increased in impotent patients (p<.005). The abnormal forms were not statistically significant in impotence and male infertility patients (p>.40), but significantly decreased in the fertility group (p<.05). Serum testosterone was very significantly increased in impotence and male infertility patients (p<.0005) and was highly significantly increased in fertility groups (p<.005). Serum FSH was improved in impotence and male infertility patients, but this improvement was not statistically significant (p>.10), and in fertility groups of male infertility patients, the results showed a statistically significant increase (p<.05). Serum LH was not statistically significant in impotence and male infertility patients (p>.10), and was significantly increased in fertility groups (p<.05). The improvement of sexual activity was 50-75%, the pregnancy rate for their partners was 37% and increased plasma testosterone levels over a period of 3 years of follow-up after varicocele repair.

Female↗

The better prognosis in secondary infertility is associated with a higher proportion of ovulation disorders.

To determine the reason for the higher pregnancy rate in couples with secondary infertility, the authors compared 237 infertile couples who had a previous pregnancy in the current partnership (secondary infertility) with 135 infertile couples in whom the woman had been pregnant only in a previous partnership and 925 couples with primary infertility. Couples with secondary infertility had the highest proportion of ovulation disorders (36%); these couples with secondary infertility and an ovulation disorder had the shortest duration of infertility (26 months). Cumulative pregnancy rates at 36 months were 56% in secondary fertility, 44% in primary infertility, and 42% in pregnancy in a previous partnership (P = 0.001). In this study, the better prognosis in secondary infertility may be related to the higher proportion of couples with ovulation disorders, who had a shorter duration of infertility. Abortion rates in the earlier pregnancies with current or previous partners were 37% and 30%, respectively; after the period of infertility, the abortion rates were 14% and 12%, respectively.

Abortion, Spontaneous↗

The effect of an infertility diagnosis on treatment-related stresses.

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of an infertility diagnosis on treatment-related stresses. One hundred infertile Chinese couples participated in this study. Three structured questionnaires were used to analyze the differences between husbands and wives. As a group wives appear to experience significantly more stress from infertility tests and treatment than their husbands, regardless of whether female infertility was present. Husbands with mixed or idiopathic infertility experienced less stress to infertility than husbands with only male infertility or female infertility. Wives with mixed or idiopathic infertility experienced less stress to infertility than wives with only a female infertility. Marital duration, time in treatment, and the number of AIH or IVF procedures were positively related to the wives' stress level, whereas only number of IVF procedures was positively related to the husbands' stress level. Interventions to enhance the infertility treatment experience are suggested.

Adult↗