Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Head Movements”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 163 records · Page 9Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

Head movement properties during voluntary rapid jaw movement in humans.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the start of the synchronized head movement during mandibular movement is evoked by the peripheral reflexes following mandibular movement (i.e. stretch or trigemino-neck reflexes), or, alternatively, is started by pre-programmed central command. Head movement accompanying voluntary rapid jaw opening movement was studied using accelerometers fixed to the upper and lower incisors, as well as electromyographs (EMGs) of the neck muscles. The direction of head acceleration at the upper incisor was towards head extension at the beginning of jaw opening movement in 89.2% of all trials, opposite to the direction of lower jaw acceleration. The onset of head acceleration was later than that of the lower jaw acceleration by averages of 6.2-10.7 ms, and the onset of electromyographic activities of the sternocleidomastoid (SCM) muscle preceded that of head acceleration by an average of 12.5-24.3 ms. These findings suggest that head movement during mandibular movement is not started by peripheral reflexes but by pre-programmed central commands. This may be relevant to muscular discomfort in the neck and shoulder regions of patients with stomatognathic disorders.

Acceleration↗
PubMed2004

Current approaches and future directions to understanding control of head movement.

This chapter reviews four key issues that must be addressed to advance our knowledge of control of head movement by the central nervous system (CNS). (1) Researchers must consider how the CNS utilizes the multiple muscle patterns that can produce the same head movement in carrying out tasks in an optimal way. (2) More attention must be paid to the dynamics of neck muscle activation that are required to implement head movements and show they are produced by CNS circuits. (3) Research is required to determine how the multiple pathways that impinge upon neck motor centers are utilized in a variety of tasks including eye-head gaze shifts, smooth head tracking, head stabilization and manipulating objects with the head. These pathways include corticospinal, vestibulospinal, reticulospinal (three subdivisions), fastigiospinal, tectospinal and interstitiospinal tracts. (4) Further analysis is needed to understand how vestibular signals are modulated during each of the above-mentioned tasks. This ambitious agenda is justified by the fact that the head-neck motor system is an ideal model for understanding issues of complex motor control.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Effects of FOV and aircraft bank on pilot head movement and reversal errors during simulated flight.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown that while flying under visual meteorological conditions (VMC) pilots tilt their head to keep the horizon stabilized on their fovea. This reflex, referred to as Opto-Kinetic Cervical Reflex (OKCR), may improve spatial awareness by establishing the horizon retinal image as a stabilized primary visual-spatial cue. Since the limited field of view (FOV) provided by helmet-mounted displays (HMDs) significantly decreases visual stimuli, the purpose of this research was to determine how reduced FOV affects head movements. HYPOTHESES: As FOV is decreased, there will be a significant reduction in OKCR-induced head movement. Reduced FOV will also increase control reversal errors. METHODS: Twelve pilots completed simulated flight tasks in a stationary dome. Head tilt, pitch, and yaw were examined as a function of aircraft bank and FOV (40 degrees, 60 degrees and 100 degrees circular). The number of control reversal errors was analyzed to investigate signs of spatial disorientation. RESULTS: During VMC manuevers pilots exhibited significant OKCR; however there were no significant differences among the three levels of FOV. FOV significantly affected head pitch movements under both VMC and instrument meteorological conditions (IMC). Pilots yawed their heads in the direction of aircraft bank under VMC. Pilots committed 22 reversal errors out of 72 trials (30.55%). The magnitude of the error was largest for the 40 degrees FOV condition. CONCLUSIONS: Pilots exhibit the OKCR under all tested levels of FOV and also make head yaw movements in order to keep the way point in sight during banking maneuvers. Pilots demonstrated stick reversal errors when transitioning from following a lead aircraft under both VMC and IMC conditions.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2000

Measurement and meaning of head movements in everyday face-to-face communicative interaction.

Methodological approaches in which data on nonverbal behavior are collected usually involve interpretative methods in which raters must identify a set of defined categories of behavior. However, present knowledge about the qualitative aspects of head movement behavior calls for recording detailed transcriptions of behavior. These records are a prerequisite for investigating the function and meaning of head movement patterns. A method for directly collecting data on head movement behavior is introduced. Using small ultrasonic transducers, which are attached to various parts of an index person's body (head and shoulders), a microcomputer determines receiver-transducer distances. Three-dimensional positions are calculated by triangulation. These data are used for further calculations concerning the angular orientation of the head and the direction, size, and speed of head movements (in rotational, lateral, and sagittal dimensions). Further analyses determine relevant changes in movements, identify segments of movements, and classify the quantifications of movement patterns. The measured patterns of nonverbal behavior can be accurately related to features of verbal communication and other time-related variables (e.g., psychophysiological measures). To estimate the possible meanings of behavioral patterns, a heuristic is proposed that includes the situational context as the basis of interpretation.

Communication↗
PubMed1992

Coordination of eye and head movements during smooth pursuit in patients with vestibular failure.

During pursuit of smoothly moving targets with combined eye and head movements in normal subjects, accurate gaze control depends on successful interaction of the vestibular and head movement signals with the ocular pursuit mechanisms. To investigate compensation for loss of the vestibulo-ocular reflex during head-free pursuit in labyrinthine-deficient patients, pursuit performance was assessed and compared under head-fixed and head-free conditions in five patients with isolated bilateral loss of vestibular function. Target motion consisted of predictable and unpredictable pseudo-random waveforms containing the sum of three or four sinusoids. Comparison of slow-phase gaze velocity gains under head-free and head-fixed conditions revealed no significant differences during pursuit of any of the three pseudo-random waveforms. The finding of significant compensatory eye movement during active head movements in darkness in labyrinthine-deficient patients, which were comparable in character and gain to the vestibular eye movement elicited in normal subjects, probably explains the similarity of the head-fixed and head-free responses. In two additional patients with cerebellar degeneration and vestibular failure, no compensatory eye movement response was observed, implying that the cerebellum is necessary for the generation of such responses in labyrinthine-deficient patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1986

Head movements in non-terrestrial force environments elicit motion sickness: implications for the etiology of space motion sickness.

Space motion sickness has become an operational concern in manned space flight. Considerable evidence exists that head movements in free fall, especially pitch movements, are provocative until adaptation occurs (3,4,8,9,11,17,18,22,26). The question arises whether space motion sickness is an unique nosological entity or is due to body movements in a nonterrestrial force environment, a force environment for which the body's dynamic sensory-motor adaptions to 1 G are no longer appropriate (14,16,18-21). To evaluate this issue, we had subjects make controlled head movements during exposure to high gravitoinertial force levels, 1.8-2.0 G, in parabolic flight maneuvers. Head movements in pitch with eyes open were most evocative of motion sickness, yaw movements with eyes covered were least provocative. This pattern is identical to that which occurs when the same types of head movements are made in the free fall phase of parabolic maneuvers (17,18). It appears that space motion sickness is the consequence of prolonged exposure to a non-terrestrial force background rather than of exposure to free fall per se.

Adult↗
PubMed1983

Cervico-ocular responses (COR) during slow sinusoidal head movements in subjects with bilateral labyrinthine lesions.

Eye movements in five patients with chronic bilateral labyrinthine loss were tested with sinusoidal movements during cervico-ocular stimulation and active head movements (0.05, 0.1 and 0.2s-1; 20, 40, and 60 degrees) and were compared with healthy subjects. Consideration was given to saccadic activity and slow phase velocity of nystagmus and overall gaze shift. The cervico-ocular response was not altered in the patients. During active pendular head movements the saccadic activity and slow phase velocity of nystagmus were more reduced than the eye shifts. The phase relation of eye shifts was not changed. In our patients neck to eye responses did not compensate for the abolished vestibulo-ocular reflex.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Head movements destabilize cyclical in-phase but not anti-phase homologous limb coordination in humans.

The present study addressed the role of head movements in the coordination of the homologous upper or lower limbs in supine normal subjects. Consistent with previous research, in-phase mirror symmetrical movements were performed more accurately and consistently than anti-phase movements. However, inclusion of head movements destabilized in-phase but not anti-phase homologous limb coordination, in contrast to previous work demonstrating a higher vulnerability of anti-phase than in-phase coordination to various experimental perturbations. It was observed that the head moved in the same direction as the limbs during anti- but not during in-phase coordination. Furthermore, the interlimb patterns also affected the head rotations that were lower in spatiotemporal consistency and less consistently coupled with the limbs during in-phase than during anti-phase coordination. These findings provide new insights into the coalition of egocentric and allocentric constraints during interlimb coordination.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Gaze-, eye-, and head-movement dynamics during closed- and open-loop gaze pursuit.

Horizontal step-ramp stimuli were used to examine gaze-, eye-, and head-movement dynamics during head-unrestrained pursuit in two rhesus monkeys. In a first series of experiments, we characterized and compared head-restrained (HR) and -unrestrained (HU) pursuit responses to unpredictable, nonperiodic, constant velocity (20-80 degrees/s) stimuli. When the head was free to move, both monkeys used a combination of eye and head motion to initially fixate and then pursue the target. The pursuit responses (i.e., gaze responses) were highly stereotyped and nearly identical among the HR and HU conditions for a given step-ramp stimulus. In the HU condition, initial eye and initial head acceleration tended to increase as a function of target velocity but did not vary systematically with initial target eccentricity. In a second series of experiments, step-ramp stimuli (40 degrees/s) were presented, and, approximately 125 ms after pursuit onset, a constant retinal velocity error (RVE) was imposed for a duration of 300 ms. In each monkey, HR and HU gaze velocity was similarly affected by stabilizing the target with respect to the monkey's fovea (i.e., RVE = 0 degrees/s) and by moving the target with constant retinal velocity errors (i.e., RVE = +/- 10 degrees/s). In the HU condition, changes in both eye and head velocity trajectories contributed to the observed gaze velocity responses to imposed RVEs. We conclude that eye and head movements are not independently controlled during HU pursuit but rather are controlled, at least in part, by a shared upstream controller within the pursuit pathways.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Static aspects of eye and head movements during reading in a simulated computer-based environment with single-vision and progressive lenses.

PURPOSE: Reading with two different intermediate progressive lens designs was investigated regarding eye and head movement patterns and compared with movement patterns with a conventional single vision lens in a computer-based work environment. METHODS: Two-dimensional eye (horizontal, vertical) and three-dimensional head (horizontal, vertical, and torsional) movements were recorded objectively and simultaneously at a rate of 60 Hz during reading of moderate contrast (40%) single- and double-page text formats at 60 cm with binocular viewing. In addition, global reading ability was rated subjectively for each lens. Subjects were 11 visually normal, presbyopic individuals aged 45 to 71 years selected by convenience sampling from a clinic population. Reading was performed with three types of spectacle lenses: a single-vision lens (SVL; 60 degrees horizontal [H] clear field-of-view [FOV]); a progressive addition lens (PAL) with a relatively wide intermediate zone (PAL-I; 7.85 mm, 18 degrees H clear FOV); and a PAL with a relatively narrow intermediate zone (PAL-II; 5.60 mm, 13 degrees H clear FOV). RESULTS: Many reading-related parameters, as well as eye- and head-movement parameters, were adversely affected by the PALs compared with the SVL. One reading-related parameter (i.e., number of regressions) differentiated between PALs. Subjective rating of global reading ability was highest with the SVL and lowest with the PAL-II. CONCLUSIONS: The optical design of a spectacle lens had significant impact on reading performance and on the combined eye-head movements initiated during reading. Both horizontal eye and head movements discriminated well between PALs and the SVL, but not between PALs, despite subjective preferences. This suggests that nonoculomotor factors contribute to patients' nonacceptance of PALs. Vertical eye and head movements and torsional head movements were not as discriminatory as were their horizontal counterparts.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

Measurement of the vestibulo-ocular reflex by magnetometry during active head movement.

A new method of measuring the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) during active head movements is presented. Subjects sat and attempted to maintain their gaze upon a fixed point whilst turning their heads from side to side in response to an auditory cue, to attain frequencies of head rotation that increased from 1 Hz to 4 Hz during a 24 s period. Head movements were monitored by a small magnetic field detector worn on the subject's forehead and positioned a set distance from a magnetic field transmitter coil. Eye movements were monitored using the corneo-retinal potential. Gain (eye angle/head angle) and phase difference (eye phase-head phase) were calculated to define the VOR. Three repeat measurements were made on 20 normal subjects. Gain decreased significantly (P < 0.0001) with increasing frequency whilst the phase difference remained unchanged. The 95% prediction intervals were narrow for both gain (+/- 0.28) and phase (+/- 11 degrees). These data, together with the speed and ease of performance of the test, suggest that the test can provide valuable information on the performance of the vestibular system.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Behavioural-analytical studies of the role of head movements in depth perception in insects, birds and mammals.

In this review, studies of the role of head movements in generating motion parallax which is used in depth perception are examined. The methods used and definitiveness of the results vary with the animal groups studied. In the case of insects, studies which quantify motor outputs have provided clear evidence that motion parallax evoked by head movements is used for distance estimation and depth perception. In the case of birds and rodents, training studies and analyses of the head movements themselves have provided similar indications. In the case of larger mammals, due to a lack of systematic experiments, the evidence is less conclusive.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1983

Vestibular-oculomotor interaction in cat eye-head movements.

When cats make slow scanning head movements, intersaccadic counterrotary eye movements are driven by the vestibulo-ocular reflex, but reset or forward saccades are not directly affected by vestibular afference. When the movements are rapid (approximately 200 deg./sec), large (greater than 40 degrees), and executed in single step shifts gaze (whether in the dark or during visual fixation shifts between known targets), there is no longer any clear vestibular effect on any eye movements during the gaze shift. The vestibulo-ocular reflex is active only at the beginning of head rotation and again at its termination as the gaze reaches its goal, even in the absence of vision. It is postulated that head-in-space and eye-in-orbit movements are perfectly monitored to adjust the amplitude of gaze shifts, despite the lack of overt vestibular effects on eye movements.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[A method for the chronic electromagnetic recording of eye and head movements in monkeys].

A search-coil method for two-dimensional chronic registration of eye and head movements is described. The method is based on the analysis of the electromotive force induced by a magnetic field in a search coil. The output parameters of the original dual system were measured using both the standard search coil and that implanted into monkey's eye. The precision of eye movement recording was evaluated in real time. Standard deviation of spontaneous noise level for both channels was equal to 0.16 degrees (deg). The same parameters representing eye movement error during gaze fixation in the horizontal (in the range of -20/+20 deg) and vertical (in the range of -13/+13 deg) directions were equal to 0.27-0.38 and 0.23-0.31 deg, respectively. The obtained errors were comparable with the angular size of the peripheral target stimuli (0.20 deg), which had to be traced by an animal with saccadic movements.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Amplitudes of head movements during putative eye-only saccades.

The mechanisms allowing humans and other primates to dissociate head and eye movements during saccades are poorly understood. A more precise knowledge of head movement behavior during apparent eye-only saccades may provide insight into those mechanisms. We studied the distributions of head amplitude in normal humans. In half of the subjects, these distributions indicated the presence of a population of minor ("residual") head movements during eye-only saccades, distinct from the continuum of head movements generated during frank eye-head saccades. Like full-sized head movements, the residual movements grew in proportion to target eccentricity, indicating their drive is derived from the premotor command for the saccade. Furthermore, their amplitudes related most strongly to the head amplitudes obtained when subjects produced full-sized head movements and were reduced when subjects were instructed to perform exclusively eye-only saccades. Both observations suggest that the drive for residual head movements originates downstream of the point in which the head movement command diverges from the generalized gaze shift command. The results are consistent with a model of head control in which a neural gate prevents the common gaze shift command from reaching the head premotor circuitry whenever an eye-only saccade is desired. However, the gate is either imperfect or the multiple pathways that relay gaze shift signals to the head motor circuitry allow for the gate to be circumvented. The results underscore the need for physiological studies to probe neuronal activity related to neck activation during eye-only saccades.

Adult↗
PubMed1987

Eye movement responses to combined linear and angular head movement.

Lateral eye movements evoked by linear head motion were evaluated in human subjects by subtracting the eye movement responses to head-centred angular oscillation in the dark, about a vertical axis, from the responses evoked by similar oscillation with the head displaced 30 cm eccentrically from the axis. The centred oscillation gave a purely angular stimulus whereas the eccentric oscillation gave an additional tangential linear acceleration acting laterally to the head. The stimuli used were relatively unpredictable, enveloped sinewaves at 0.02 to 1.2 Hz, 60 degrees/s peak angular velocity, 0.004 to 0.24 g peak tangential acceleration, and subjects were either given no instructions or were told to imagine fixating on targets at 60 cm or 5 m distance. Eye movements of significantly higher velocity were evoked in the eccentric position, particularly at the higher frequencies and when subjects imagined near targets. The increase in velocity of eye movement was attributed to the linear stimulus and probably derives from stimulation of the otolith organs. The frequency response of the gain (degree/s/g) of these movements gave an approximate slope of -1, indicating that the eye velocity bears a constant proportionality to linear head velocity. The findings are in accord with the theoretical prediction that eye movements compensating for linear head motion should only be required for viewing near targets. These otolithic influences on eye movements could either the mediated by a direct "otolith-ocular reflex" which is subservient to viewing conditions, or, alternatively, the otolith signals may modify the activity of other oculomotor mechanisms.

Acceleration↗
PubMed1990

Gaze control in the cat: studies and modeling of the coupling between orienting eye and head movements in different behavioral tasks.

1. Orienting movements, consisting of coordinated eye and head displacements, direct the visual axis to the source of a sensory stimulus. A recent hypothesis suggests that the CNS may control gaze position (gaze = eye-relative-to-space = eye-relative-to-head + head-relative-to-space) by the use of a feedback circuit wherein an internally derived representation of gaze motor error drives both eye and head premotor circuits. In this paper we examine the effect of behavioral task on the individual and summed trajectories of horizontal eye- and head-orienting movements to gain more insight into how the eyes and head are coupled and controlled in different behavioral situations. 2. Cats whose heads were either restrained (head-fixed) or unrestrained (head-free) were trained to make orienting movements of any desired amplitude in a simple cat-and-mouse game we call the barrier paradigm. A rectangular opaque barrier was placed in front of the hungry animal who either oriented to a food target that was visible to one side of the barrier or oriented to a location on an edge of the barrier where it predicted the target would reappear from behind the barrier. 3. The dynamics (e.g., maximum velocity) and duration of eye- and head-orienting movements were affected by the task. Saccadic eye movements (head-fixed) elicited by the visible target attained greater velocity and had shorter durations than comparable amplitude saccades directed toward the predicted target. A similar observation has been made in human and monkey. In addition, when the head was unrestrained both the eye and head movements (and therefore gaze movements) were faster and shorter in the visible- compared with the predicted-target conditions. Nevertheless, the relative contributions of the eye and head to the overall gaze displacement remained task independent: i.e., the distance traveled by the eye and head movements was determined by the size of the gaze shift only. This relationship was maintained because the velocities of the eye and head movements covaried in the different behavioral situations. Gaze-velocity profiles also had characteristic shapes that were dependent on task. In the predicted-target condition these profiles tended to have flattened peaks, whereas when the target was visible the peaks were sharper. 4. Presentation of a visual cue (e.g., reappearance of food target) immediately before (less than 50 ms) the onset of a gaze shift to a predicted target triggered a midflight increase in first the eye- and, after approximately 20 ms, the head-movement velocity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Animals↗