Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “HEMORRHOIDS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 163 records · Page 9Linked to original sources
PubMed1985

Anal manometric findings in symptomatic hemorrhoids.

Anal manometric findings were studied in 50 patients with symptomatic hemorrhoids and an equal number of age- and sex-matched control subjects. Manometry was performed with a continuously perfused catheter by the continuous pull-through technique. Both the control subjects and patients had significant negative correlations between age and basal pressure; i.e., basal pressure was lower with advancing age. Patients with symptomatic hemorrhoids had significantly higher maximal basal pressure (P less than 0.02) and maximal voluntary contraction pressure (P less than 0.05) as compared to controls. There was no correlation between the anal manometric findings and the degree of hemorrhoids or duration of symptoms. Those patients who had bleeding as the predominant symptom had higher basal pressures; (P less than 0.05) than those who had prolapsing hemorrhoids as the predominant symptom.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The relationship of hemorrhoids to portal hypertension.

Records of 188 patients with documented portal hypertension were reviewed to determine the incidence of hemorrhoids as well as bleeding complications associated with this condition. The incidence of hemorrhoids among these patients was not increased compared to the normal population. Six of the patients with portal hypertension did, however, bleed massively from hemorrhoids. Elevated portal venous pressure is an important factor in those patients having severe hemorrhoidal bleeding. The presence of coagulation defects may also be of considerable importance.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Randomized controlled trial of LigaSure with submucosal dissection versus Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy for prolapsed hemorrhoids.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes between the LigaSure vessel sealing system and the conventional closed Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy procedure performed by diathermy. METHODS: A series of 84 patients with grades III and IV hemorrhoids were randomized into two groups: (1) LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy with submucosal dissection (42 patients) and (2) Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy (42 patients). The patient demographics, operative details, parenteral analgesic requirement, postoperative pain score (assessed by an independent assessor), operating time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, early and delayed complications, and time off from work or normal activity were recorded. The patients were regularly followed up at 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks after surgery. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of age, gender, duration of symptoms, grade of the hemorrhoid(s), or number of hemorrhoids resected. The mean operating time for LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy with submucosal dissection was significantly shorter than that for the Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy (11.3 +/- 0.4 vs. 34.2 +/- 0.7 minutes; P < 0.0001). Patients treated with the LigaSure method had significantly less blood loss (P < 0.0001), a better pain score (P < 0.0001), less parenteral analgesic requirement (P < 0.0001), shorter hospital stay (P < 0.0001), and less time off from work or normal activity (P < 0.0001). There was no difference in the early and delayed postoperative complications between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy with submucosal dissection is a safe, effective procedure for grade III and IV hemorrhoids. Patients derive greater short-term benefits: reduced intraoperative blood loss, operating time, and postoperative pain as well as earlier resumption of work or normal activity. Long-term follow-up with a larger number of patients is required to confirm the long-term results of this procedure.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Sclerosing therapy of internal hemorrhoids with a novel sclerosing agent. Comparison with ligation and excision.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patients with prolapsing internal hemorrhoids were treated with a novel sclerosing agent (OC-108), and the results were compared with surgery of ligation and excision. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 20 years or older patients with prolapsing internal hemorrhoids who visited ten medical institutions in Japan from October 2000 to October 2002. Investigation on surgery was also performed. RESULTS: Comparing OC-108 and surgery in patients with third- and fourth-degree internal hemorrhoids according to the Goligher's classification, for which surgery has been generally indicated, at 28 days after treatment, the disappearance rate of prolapse was similar between OC-108 and surgery, 94% (75/80 patients) and 99% (84/85 patients), respectively. The 1-year recurrence rate was 16% (12/73 patients) in the OC-108 group, and this value was satisfactory because of its less invasive nature while it was more or less higher compared with 2% (2/81 patients) in the surgery group. The incidences of pain and bleeding were lower in the OC-108 group. CONCLUSIONS: OC-108 is a useful alternative treatment for hemorrhoids.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Rubber band ligation of hemorrhoids: relapse as a function of time.

Rubber band ligation is a well established treatment of internal second-degree hemorrhoids. Up to now, the long-term results (> 5 years) of this method have not been assessed. The aim of this study was to determine the long-term success rate of rubber band ligation in patients with a first episode of second-degree hemorrhoids not responding to medical treatment (local cream with laxative). A total of 92 patients who were treated between 1979 and 1997 for second-degree hemorrhoids responded to a questionnaire. The need for complementary conservative (sclerotherapy, cryotherapy or rubber band ligation) or surgical treatment was considered indicative of relapse. The collected data were analyzed according to the Kaplan-Meier method. The average follow-up time was 5.6 years. There were 21 patients who suffered a relapse. The probability of successful treatment was 0.77 (range: 0.67-0.88) after 5 years and 0.68 (range: 0.5-0.86) after 10.6 years. We conclude that rubber band ligation represent an efficient long-term treatment for second-degree hemorrhoids. Approximately two thirds of the patients are cured after 5 years and more than a half after 10 years.

Female↗
PubMed2004

A comparative study between radiofrequency ablation with plication and Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy for grade III hemorrhoids.

BACKGROUND: Milligan-Morgan (MM) hemorrhoidectomy is the most favored treatment for prolapsed hemorrhoids. However, it may be associated with severe postoperative pain, long periods of convalescence and other complications. In alternative, I use a procedure of radiofrequency ablation and plication (RAP) of hemorrhoids. The present study compared the two procedures in terms of surgical parameters, postoperative pain and complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 60 patients with grade III hemorrhoids were randomized to undergo radiofrequency ablation and plication (31 patients) or MM hemorrhoidectomy (29 patients). The patients were followed up to 2 years. RESULTS: Duration of surgery was significantly longer in the MM group as was postoperative hospitalization (p<0.05). Post-defecation pain and pain at rest were much less in the RAP group (p<0.05). Wound healing period (17 vs. 38 days) and time to return to work (7 vs. 17 days) were the other significant findings favoring RAP procedure. Early complications occurred more frequently in MM group, but late complications like external skin tags (4 vs. 2 patients) were more common in RAP group. One asymptomatic recurrence was noted in RAP group. CONCLUSIONS: Radiofrequency ablation and plication of hemorrhoids is associated with significantly less postoperative pain, shorter hospital stay and earlier return to normal activity. It can be considered as an alternative to the Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy.

Catheter Ablation↗
PubMed2003

Prospective study of factors affecting postoperative pain and symptom persistence after stapled rectal mucosectomy for hemorrhoids: a need for preservation of squamous epithelium.

PURPOSE The purpose of the study was to determine the variables associated with postoperative pain and the clinical response of patients with uncomplicated hemorrhoidal disease treated with stapled rectal mucosectomy in the medium term. METHODS Patients with Grade II to IV, uncomplicated hemorrhoidal disease who underwent stapled rectal mucosectomy were prospectively included. The basal characteristics of the population were evaluated and level of stapling and placement of hemostatic suture determined. Histologically, the type of resected epithelium and presence of muscle fibers was evaluated. Postoperative pain was evaluated by means of a visual analog scale. Complications and clinical response were evaluated. RESULTS One hundred patients with a mean age of 43.9 years were included. Only columnar epithelium was resected in 48, transitional epithelium in 47, and squamous epithelium in 5 patients. Smooth muscle fragments were found in 55 patients, and, in 12 of these, fibers from the external muscular layer of rectum were also seen. Follow-up was 12.6 +/- 3.4 (range, 7-24) months. A total of 79 patients were completely asymptomatic at the end of follow-up. Resected squamous epithelium was associated with a higher postoperative pain level in the multivariate analysis (coefficient beta = 1.16 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.08-2.24); P = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS Rectal mucosectomy with stapler is an effective method for the treatment of uncomplicated prolapsing hemorrhoidal disease. Intensity of postoperative pain was associated with the type of resected epithelium. This suggests that low transection of hemorrhoids must be avoided.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Excision of thrombosed external hemorrhoid under local anesthesia: a retrospective evaluation of 340 patients.

PURPOSE: This study was a retrospective analysis of complication rates, symptom recurrence, long-term results, and patient satisfaction after outpatient excision (local anesthesia) of thrombosed external hemorrhoids. METHODS: From 1995 to 2000, 340 patients (166 males) underwent office-based excision of thrombosed external hemorrhoids under local anesthesia. Data regarding complications, operations because of recurrence, residual symptoms, patient's satisfaction with anesthesia, and wound treatment were obtained by questionnaire. Response was solicited at a minimum of 9 months postprocedure. RESULTS: Complete follow-up data was available in 88 percent of patients (mean follow-up, 17.3 months). Recurrent thrombosed external hemorrhoid requiring a procedure developed in 22 (6.5 percent) patients. Other complications that required operative intervention were one (0.3 percent) incidence of postoperative bleeding and seven (2.1 percent) perianal abscess/fistula. The majority of patients (66 percent) had no anal complaints at follow-up. Local anesthesia would be preferred if a repeat excision was required in 79 percent, whereas 11 percent would prefer another form of anesthesia and 10 percent were unsure. CONCLUSION: Outpatient excision under local anesthesia of a thrombosed external hemorrhoid can be safely performed with a low recurrence and complication rate while offering a high level of patient of acceptance and satisfaction.

Abscess↗
PubMed2003

Short-term and long-term results of combined sclerotherapy and rubber band ligation of hemorrhoids and mucosal prolapse.

PURPOSE: Rubber band ligation is a common office procedure for symptomatic hemorrhoids. The aim of the study was to assess our short-term and long-term results of combined sclerotherapy and rubber band ligation in the management of hemorrhoids and incomplete mucosal prolapse. METHODS: Data on 6,739 patients who had previous combined sclerotherapy and rubber band ligation by the senior authors (GLN and PRD) were retrieved from the database dating between January 1976 and June 2000. These patients either had hemorrhoids or incomplete mucosal prolapse. Furthermore, questionnaires were sent to a random sample of 2,400 patients. Telephone interviews were performed for 600 of the nonrespondents. RESULTS: Of 6,739 patients (3,683 males; mean age, 46.7 years) in the database, 4,686 (70 percent) received the procedure once, and 2,053 (30 percent) received the procedure more than once. There were 5,689 patients (84 percent) who had their procedures performed consecutively within a planned period, and only 1,050 patients (16 percent) had repeat procedures after a period of more than 12 months from their last treatments. Thus, the recurrence rate was 16 percent. The overall complication rate was 3.1 percent, with minor bleeding being the major complaint. With regard to the questionnaire, 44 percent responded. The mean follow-up period was 6.5 (range, 1-11) years. There were patients who had residual symptoms of bleeding (19 percent), itch (21 percent), and lump (20 percent). However, 58 percent of patients who replied were asymptomatic. With satisfaction scores ranging from +3 to -3 (+3 indicating complete satisfaction and -3 indicating complete dissatisfaction), 90 percent scored >/=1, 9 percent scored 0 or less, and 1 percent did not specify a score. Hemorrhoidectomy was required in 7.7 percent of the responders. Of 600 phone interviews with the nonrespondents, 152 responded to the questionnaires. Although there was less satisfaction from the phone respondents, which may have accounted for the initial nonresponse, no statistical difference was detected in residual symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Combined triple sclerotherapy and rubber band ligation is an effective treatment for early hemorrhoids and incomplete mucosal prolapse, with low rates of recurrence, complications, and hemorrhoidectomy, and it can be repeated easily.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1977

Anal pressures in hemorrhoids and anal fissure.

Maximal anal pressures have been measured after proctoscopy in 145 patients with hemorrhoids, 48 patients with anal fissure, and 78 asymptomatic control subjects. Anal pressures in patients with hemorrhoids (106 +/- 40 cm H2O) and anal fissure (130 +/- 43 cm H2O) were very significantly higher than those of controls (88 +/- 34 cm H2O) (P less than 0.001). Because patients with anal fissure have high anal pressures, these patients should benefit from manual dilatation of the anus or lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy; however, only young male patients with hemorrhoids have anal pressures that are significantly higher than age- and sex-matched controls. Digital assessment and the two finger test are unreliable indicators of high anal pressure. These results indicate that measurement of anal pressure is useful in assessing the suitability of manual dilatation or sphincterotomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

Relationship of portal pressure, anorectal varices and hemorrhoids in cirrhotic patients.

In a prospective study of 103 consecutive cirrhotic patients a high prevalence (43%) of anorectal varices was found compared with only 2% in 103 age- and sex-matched control subjects (p less than 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the prevalences of hemorrhoids in cirrhotic patients and in control subjects (79% vs. 83%, p greater than 0.05). The hepatic venous pressure gradient of cirrhotic patients with anorectal varices was similar to cirrhotic patients without anorectal varices (14 +/- 6 mmHg, n = 22, vs. 16 +/- 7 mmHg, n = 39, p greater than 0.05. There was no significant difference in the hepatic venous pressure gradient between cirrhotic patients with and without hemorrhoids (15 +/- 6 mmHg, n = 47, vs. 16 +/- 8 mmHg, n = 14, p greater than 0.05). The prevalence of anorectal varices and hemorrhoids in cirrhotic patients had no relation to Child-Pugh's grading, esophageal varices with and without sclerotherapy and ascites. We conclude that anorectal varices are common in cirrhotic patients. Anorectal varices and hemorrhoids are not related to the degree of portal pressure.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

[The surgical treatment of hemorrhoids].

Surgery is the most effective treatment in patients with symptomatic grade III-IV hemorrhoids who have not responded to outpatient treatment, when there is associated abnormalities (anal fissure, anal fistula, skin tags) and in thrombosed hemorrhoids. Hemorrhoidectomy is currently the "gold standard" treatment. Randomized controlled trials comparing open with closed hemorrhoidectomy show no significant differences in pain scores. Stapled hemorrhoidectomy produces less postoperative pain than hemorrhoidectomy but is less effective in terms of symptom control. No treatment is superior to others in reducing postoperative pain except the use of drugs and anesthetic techniques. In patients with prolapsed internal hemorrhoids and thrombosed hemorrhoids, treatment may initially consist of an urgent hemorrhoidectomy with the same results as those obtained with elective surgery.

Digestive System Surgical Procedures↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Endoscopic retrograde hemorrhoidal sclerotherapy using 23.4% saline: a preliminary report.

Historically, injection sclerotherapy has had a prominent role in the treatment of symptomatic hemorrhoids. Concern over sclerosant-related morbidity and dissatisfaction with anoscopic injection techniques has limited the application of this modality in the United States. This study reports an initial evaluation of 23.4% saline, used as a nonallergenic sclerosant, in the flexible endoscopic treatment of symptomatic internal hemorrhoids. Initial results in 19 patients with symptomatic grade I, II, or III hemorrhoids suggest that the technique is very effective in relieving bleeding, and frequently alleviates prolapse as well. The technique has proven to be well tolerated and associated with high patient satisfaction and low complication rates, with no serious complications noted. This modality is eminently suited for single session examination and therapy of the patient undergoing endoscopic evaluation for lower gastrointestinal bleeding whose findings are limited to hemorrhoidal disease.

Colonoscopy↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A prospective crossover trial of direct current electrotherapy in symptomatic hemorrhoidal disease.

Many new modalities have been developed to treat symptomatic hemorrhoidal disease. In order to determine whether direct current electrotherapy therapy is effective, a prospective, crossover study was done. Sixteen patients referred for treatment of symptomatic hemorrhoids underwent a 16-week treatment protocol. Patients were randomized to receive either medical therapy with a sham therapy, or medical therapy with active direct current electrotherapy at 4-week intervals. All patients were instructed in medical therapy including sitz baths, hydrocortisone suppositories, topical preparations, and a high fiber diet with an educational booklet. Patients who did not respond to initial therapy were crossed over at 8 weeks, receiving alternate therapy twice. Improvement in symptoms, or lack thereof, was not statistically different between the two treatment groups. Comparisons of the internal sphincter pressure, external sphincter pressure, maximum squeeze pressure, and rectal sensitivity to balloon insufflation (volume) were not statistically different before, during, or after any treatment modality (p = 0.46, 0.60, 0.33). The size and grade of hemorrhoids on entry into the study had no bearing on the outcome. In a prospective crossover trial, no difference could be found between standard medical therapy and direct current electrotherapy in the treatment of symptomatic-hemorrhoidal disease.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Randomized, prospective trial of direct current versus bipolar electrocoagulation for bleeding internal hemorrhoids.

Fifty patients with bleeding internal hemorrhoids unresponsive to 6 weeks of standard medical therapy were randomly assigned to receive treatment with direct current or bipolar electrocoagulation. Treatment groups were similar in bleeding severity and internal hemorrhoid grade. Treatment sessions were significantly longer for direct current electrocoagulation (8.8 +/- 0.2 minutes) than for bipolar electrocoagulation (0.1 +/- 0.03 minutes) (p < 0.001). When compared to the bipolar electrocoagulation group, direct current electrocoagulation patients had more procedural pain that terminated therapy (5 of 25 patients [20%] versus 0 of 25 [0%], for a difference of 20% [95% confidence interval, 4% to 36%]; p = 0.05) and prolonged pain after the procedure (4 of 25 patients [16%] versus 1 of 25 [4%], for a difference of 12% [95% confidence interval, -4% to 28%]; p = 0.35). However, more post-treatment rectal ulcerations were seen in the bipolar electrocoagulation-treated group (6 of 25 patients [24%] versus 1 of 25 [4%], for a difference of 20% [95% confidence interval, 2% to 38%]; p = 0.10). Treatment groups did not differ in number of treatment sessions or months of follow-up. The rates of success, defined as obliteration of the hemorrhoids or cessation of bleeding with reduction of the hemorrhoids to grade 1 or less, for the direct current electrocoagulation and the bipolar electrocoagulation groups were 88% and 92%, respectively. Failures in the direct current electrocoagulation group were uncontrollable bleeding (n = 1) and refusal to continue therapy because of pain (n = 2).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Prospective randomized comparative study of bipolar electrocoagulation versus heater probe for treatment of chronically bleeding internal hemorrhoids.

BACKGROUND: Our purpose was to compare the efficacy, complications, failure rates, and crossovers of heater and bipolar probe treatments of chronically bleeding internal hemorrhoids. METHODS: Eighty-one patients (31 female, 50 male) with mean age of 53 years had large (grade 2 to 3) internal hemorrhoids with bleeding for a mean of 12 years, had failed medical management, and were randomized in a prospective study of anoscopic treatments to heater versus bipolar probes. Failure was defined as a major complication or failure to reduce the size of all internal hemorrhoids with three or more treatments. RESULTS: With similar background variables and no difference in treatment times, rectal bleeding and other symptoms were controlled in a shorter time with the heater probe than with the bipolar probe (77 versus 121 days). Five complications (fissures, bleeding, or rectal spasm) occurred with the bipolar probe, and two occurred with the heater probe. The heater probe caused more pain during treatments but had significantly fewer failures and crossovers. CONCLUSIONS: For patients who had failed medical management of chronically bleeding internal hemorrhoids, the techniques and complications of heater and bipolar probes were similar, but pain was more common, failures and crossovers were less frequent, and the time to symptom relief was shorter with the heater probe than with the bipolar probe.

Chronic Disease↗
PubMed1997

Micronized flavonoid therapy in internal hemorrhoids of pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety, efficacy and acceptability of a micronized flavonoid formulation in the treatment of internal hemorrhoids of pregnancy. METHODS: In an open study on hospital outpatients, we studied therapy with micronized diosmin 90% and hesperidin 10% for a median of 8 weeks before delivery and 4 weeks after delivery, in 50 women with acute hemorrhoids. The outcome measures were symptoms and signs of hemorrhoids; adverse effects; and acceptability of treatment. RESULT: On intention to treat analysis, 66% (95% confidence interval, range 79.1-52.9) had relief from acute symptoms by the 4th day; 53.6% (95% confidence interval, range 70-37.1, P < 0.001) fewer patients had relapse in the antenatal period. Treatment was well accepted, and did not affect pregnancy, fetal development, birth weight, infant growth and feeding. CONCLUSION: In the short term, micronized diosmin 90% and hesperidin 10% is safe, acceptable, and effective in the treatment of hemorrhoids of pregnancy.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2002

Effect of esophageal variceal band ligation on hemorrhoids, anorectal varices, and portal hypertensive colopathy.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Although it is known that obliteration of esophageal varices following endoscopic variceal band ligation results in an increase in the incidence of portal hypertensive gastropathy, the effect of variceal ligation on hemorrhoids, anorectal/colonic varices and portal hypertensive colopathy is not known. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of endoscopic variceal band ligation on hemorrhoids, anorectal/colonic varices and portal hypertensive colopathy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 60 consecutive patients with cirrhosis of the liver and portal hypertension were prospectively studied. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and full-length colonoscopy were carried out before the patients underwent endoscopic variceal band ligation for esophageal varices and after obliteration of the varices following band ligation. RESULTS: Obliteration of esophageal varices by endoscopic variceal band ligation did not affect the incidence of hemorrhoids (37 % before and after), anorectal varices (40 % before and after), and portal hypertensive colopathy (57 % before and after). CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that esophageal variceal band ligation does not affect the incidence of hemorrhoids, anorectal varices or portal hypertensive colopathy in patients with cirrhosis of the liver.

Adolescent↗