Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Diverticulitis”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 163 records · Page 9Linked to original sources

Risk factors for mortality and morbidity after elective sigmoid resection for diverticulitis: prospective multicenter multivariate analysis of 582 patients.

The prevalence of diverticular disease of the colon is increasing in occidental countries. It would be useful to further decrease the mortality and morbidity after elective sigmoid resection (ESR) for diverticulitis. The aim of this study was to identify modifiable preoperative and intraoperative risk factors for mortality and morbidity after ESR for diverticulitis. A database of 2615 patients who underwent a colon or rectal resection with primary anastomosis between 1985 to 1998 has been constructed from prospective randomized studies published by a French surgical group. Of those patients, 582 had undergone ESR for diverticulitis, and they constitute the population of the present study. A total of 46 potential preoperative and intraoperative risk factors for mortality and morbidity have been studied by univariate and multivariate analysis. The operative mortality for our series was 1.2%, and the overall morbidity was 24.9%. The multivariate analysis revealed two statistically significant independent risk factors of mortality: age >75 (odds-ratio=7.9; 95% confidence interval [CI 1.7-36.6]; p=0.01) and obesity (odds-ratio=5.2; 95% CI [1.1-27.9]; p=0.04). The abdominal morbidity (AM) was 6.5% (38/582). The absence of antimicrobial prophylaxis administration with ceftriaxone was the only significant risk factor for AM in multivariate analysis (p=0.003; odds-ratio=2; 95% CI [1.1-4]). The extraabdominal morbidity (EAM) was 18.4% (107/582). Both chronic pulmonary disease (p=0.008; odds-ratio=2.9; 95% CI [1.4-6]; p=0.008) and cirrhosis (odds-ratio=12; 95% CI [1.2-120]) proved to be significant risk factors for EAM. Weight control prior to surgery, routine administration of prophylactic preoperative antibiotics, and preoperative optimization of the respiratory status of patients with chronic pulmonary disease could decrease the postoperative mortality and morbidity associated with ESR for diverticulitis.

Aged↗

Can laparoscopically assisted sigmoid resection provide uncomplicated management even in cases of complicated diverticulitis?

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopically assisted sigmoid resection has become an accepted method for treating uncomplicated diverticulitis. This prospective study aimed to compare the results of laparoscopic sigmoid resection for uncomplicated and complicated sigmoid diverticular disease used to check the indication for the complicated stages of diverticulitis. METHODS: All patients who underwent laparoscopic resection for sigmoid diverticulitis at the authors' hospital between 1999 and 2005 were divided into two groups: group 1 (uncomplicated diverticular disease) and group 2 (complicated diverticular disease). The exclusion criteria specified generalized peritonitis, signs of sepsis, and extensive previous abdominal surgery. RESULTS: Of the 203 patients (108 men and 95 women) who underwent laparoscopically assisted resection during the examination period, 112 were assigned to group 1 and 91 to group 2. Differences in favor of group 1 were found for the duration of surgery (154 vs 166 min), the conversion rate (1.8% vs 9.9%), the postoperative wound infections (2.7% vs 13.2%), and the postoperative hospitalization period (12.3 +/- 3.9 vs 15.0 +/- 5.6 days). No significant differences were seen in any other areas such as completion of nutritional buildup (4.6 vs 5.0 days) or time until the first postoperative bowel movement (2.8 vs 3.3 days). Total postoperative morbidity (16.1% vs 26.4%; p = 0.10) tended to be increased in group 2, but this difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic sigmoid resection can be performed for patients who have complicated diverticulitis without significantly increasing their overall morbidity. This group of patients could benefit from the advantages of the minimally invasive procedure despite a longer operating time and a higher conversion rate.

Adult↗

Elective laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis. Results of a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: We undertook a prospective evaluation of elective laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis in order to assess the risks and benefits of this approach. METHODS: Between November 1992 and November 1996, 54 consecutive patients were included in this study. Their mean age was 59 +/- 13 years (range, 36-81). The number of attacks of diverticulitis before colectomy ranged from one to four (mean, 2.2 +/- 0.7). The operative technique consisted of elective division of the inferior mesenteric vessels, left colonic flexure mobilization, and colorectal anastomosis using the cross-stapling technique. RESULTS: Five procedures (9.2%) were converted. The primary cause for conversion was obesity. These patients had a simple postoperative course. There were no postoperative deaths. Three patients (6.1%) developed abdominal complications, and four patients (8.2%) had abdominal wall complications. Postoperative paralytic ileus lasted only 2.3 +/- 0.7 days (range, 1-6), allowing for a rapid reintroduction of regular diet. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 6.4 +/- 2.7 days (range, 4-15). CONCLUSIONS: Elective laparoscopic colectomy for diverticulitis is feasible in most cases. In most cases, the operative risk is low and the postoperative course is uneventful. Elective sigmoid laparoscopic colectomy should be considered a good therapeutic option for symptomatic diverticulitis.

Adult↗

Laparoscopic colectomy vs traditional colectomy for diverticulitis. Outcome and costs.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy for diverticulitis. METHODS: Fourteen consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy (LSC) for diverticulitis were evaluated. Medical records from a control group of 14 matched patients undergoing traditional open sigmoid colectomy (OSC) for diverticulitis were reviewed for comparison. RESULTS: Mean age, operative time, morbidity, and mortality of the LSC and OSC groups were not significantly different. However, the mean estimated blood loss (171cc vs 321cc), days to p.o. liquids (2.9 vs 6.1), and postoperative stay (6.3 vs 9.2 days) were all significantly less in the LSC patients. Although the mean operating room charges were greater in the LSC patients ($10,589 vs $8,207) the mean total hospital charges ($29,981 vs $36,745) and costs ($11,528 vs $13,426) were markedly less. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with OSC for diverticulitis, LSC results in a more rapid return of bowel function and shortened hospital stay. Despite the greater operating room charges of LSC, the total hospital charges and costs are lessened.

Adult↗

Diverticulitis in young patients: is resection after a single attack always warranted?

PURPOSE: Diverticulitis has been described as a more virulent disease in young patients, necessitating an aggressive surgical approach. We hypothesized that the subgroup of young patients who do not require surgery on their initial presentation are unlikely to present at a later date with perforation and do not always require prophylactic resection as commonly recommended. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of all patients presenting to Fletcher Allen Health Care, the teaching hospital of the University of Vermont, from January 1, 1990 to June 30, 2001. Outcomes in patients aged 50 years or younger (Group 1) were compared with patients older than aged 50 years (Group 2) using a log-rank test. RESULTS: A total of 762 patients were admitted with sigmoid diverticulitis during the study period, 238 (31 percent) of whom underwent surgery. Two hundred fifty-nine patients (34 percent) were younger than aged 50 years (Group 1). The risk of requiring surgery on initial hospital presentation was similar between the two groups (24 vs. 22 percent, respectively; P = 0.8). However, Group 1 patients were more likely to be treated operatively at some point during the study period (40 vs. 26 percent; P = 0.001) because of an increase in elective resections. Of 196 patients in Group 1 who had an initial medically managed admission, only 1 presented at a later date with perforation (0.5 percent). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of subsequent diverticular perforation in medically managed young patients with sigmoid diverticulitis is very low. As such, the frequently espoused policy of routine surgery after a single attack of diverticulitis in young patients may not be warranted. A more selective approach seems to be safe.

Adult↗

Laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for fistulized diverticulitis.

PURPOSE: Nowadays laparoscopic colorectal surgery has demonstrated its advantages, including reduced postoperative pain, decreased duration of ileus, and shorter hospital stay. Few studies report results of laparoscopic surgery in complicated diverticulitis. This study was designed to analyze the results of laparoscopic sigmoidectomy in patients with fistulized sigmoiditis. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed 16 patients who had laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for fistulized diverticulitis between 1992 and 2003 in a series of 247 laparoscopic colectomies. Eleven patients presented with colovesical, four with colovaginal, and one with colocutaneous fistulas; all were caused by sigmoiditis. The procedure always consisted of celioscopic sigmoidectomy with stapled transanal suture and, when indicated, closure of the cystic or vaginal fistula orifice. RESULTS: Mean age was 60 (range, 39-78) years. Mean number of episodes of diverticulitis before operation was three (range, 1-5). Mean time between the last episode and operation was 46 (range, 2-250) weeks. In our first three years of experience, three cases (18.7 percent) were converted to laparotomy. Reasons for conversion were the necessity for intestinal resection, splenectomy, and a wound of the anterior rectum. The mean operative time was 172 (range, 100-280) minutes. Mean hospital stay was 5.7 (range, 3-12) days. There was no mortality. Postoperative morbidity (2 patients, 12.5 percent) consisted of one pulmonary infection and one splenectomy. Long-term follow-up revealed no recurrence of diverticulitis and one incisional hernia. CONCLUSIONS: In experienced hands, laparoscopic sigmoidectomy may be a safe and effective procedure for fistulized sigmoiditis.

Adult↗

Management of acute diverticulitis in the East Anglian region: results of a United Kingdom regional survey.

PURPOSE: Acute diverticulitis is the most common presentation of diverticular disease; however, no published guidelines for management are available in the United Kingdom. This survey was designed to assess the current United Kingdom regional practice compared with the guidelines published by The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. METHODS: A questionnaire survey focused on the management of acute diverticulitis was sent to all consultants, specialist registrars, and staff-grade surgeons in general surgery in one United Kingdom region. RESULTS: Eighty-two questionnaires were returned (80 percent). A majority (80 percent) would request routine blood tests, abdominal, and erect chest x-rays on arrival. Pethidine (56 percent) was the preferred analgesic, followed by morphine (40 percent). Ninety-four percent used an antibiotic combination of second/third-generation cephalosporin and metronidazole. Computerized tomography was the most commonly used initial investigation (42 percent). Forty percent use barium enema and 31 percent use a combination of barium enema and sigmoidoscopy as follow-up investigations. In patients older than aged 50 years, elective resection would be considered by a majority (51 percent) only when complications arose. In those aged 50 years or younger, 35 percent would resect only if complications arose with only 6 percent after a single episode of acute diverticulitis. CONCLUSIONS: There are major differences in the management of patients with acute diverticulitis in our current practice in one United Kingdom region compared with the guidelines published by The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, which are based on published literature. There is an urgent need to establish similar guidelines in the United Kingdom to improve the clinical outcome of patients with such a common condition.

Acute Disease↗

Percutaneous CT scan-guided drainage vs. antibiotherapy alone for Hinchey II diverticulitis: a case-control study.

PURPOSE: CT-scan-guided percutaneous abscess drainage of Hinchey Stage II diverticulitis is considered the best initial approach to treat conservatively the abscess and to subsequently perform an elective sigmoidectomy. However, drainage is not always technically feasible, may expose the patient to additional morbidity, and has not been critically evaluated in this indication. This study was undertaken to compare the results of percutaneous drainage vs. antibiotic therapy alone in patients with Hinchey II diverticulitis. METHODS: This was a case-control study of all patients who presented in our institution with Hinchey Stage II diverticulitis between 1993 and 2005. Thirty-four patients underwent abscess drainage under CT-scan guidance (Group 1), and 32 patients were treated with antibiotic therapy alone (Group 2), in most cases because CT-scan-guided abscess drainage was considered technically unfeasible by the interventional radiology team. Initial conservative treatment was considered a failure when: 1) emergency surgery had to be performed, 2) signs of worsening sepsis developed, and 3) abscess recurred within four weeks of drainage. RESULTS: The median size of abscess was 6 (range, 3-18) cm in Group 1 and 4 (range, 3-10) cm in Group 2 (P = 0.002). Median duration of drainage was 8 (range, 1-18) days. Conservative treatment failed in 11 patients (33 percent) of Group 1, and in 6 patients (19 percent) of Group 2 (P = 0.26). Ten patients (29 percent) in Group 1 and five patients (16 percent) in Group 2 underwent emergency surgery (P = 0.24); there were four postoperative deaths (26.6 percent) in this subgroup. Twelve patients (35 percent) in Group 1 and 16 patients (50 percent) in Group 2 subsequently underwent an elective sigmoid resection (P = 0.31). In this subgroup of patients, there was neither anastomotic leakage nor postoperative death. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency surgery for Hinchey Stage II diverticulitis carries a high mortality rate and should be avoided. To achieve this, antibiotic therapy alone seems to be a safe alternative, whenever percutaneous drainage is technically difficult or hazardous. Actually, our data did not demonstrate any benefit of CT scan-guided percutaneous abscess drainage, suggesting that the role of interventional radiology techniques in this indication deserves further critical evaluation.

Abscess↗

Acute diverticulitis in very young patients: a frequent surgical management.

PURPOSE: The natural history of sigmoid diverticulitis in terms of the virulence and management in young patients is an ongoing controversy. This retrospective study was designed to assess the severity and early management of acute diverticulitis according to age. METHODS: From 2000 to 2004, 284 patients were admitted for acute diverticulitis. Fifty-two patients (18 percent) were aged 50 years or younger and were divided in two groups: aged 40 years or younger (Group 1, n = 20), and patients older than aged 40 years (Group 2, n = 32). The diagnosis was confirmed by computed tomography in 49 patients (94 percent). RESULTS: Radiologic findings showed that the rate of complicated lesions (i.e., diverticular perforation and/or abscess) was significantly higher for patients younger than aged 40 years than patients older, respectively 72 and 35 percent (P = 0.02). The risk of requiring immediate surgical treatment was significantly more frequent in Group 1 than Group 2 (40 vs.13 percent; P = 0.04). There was a trend toward a higher risk of "major surgery" (i.e., Hartmann's procedure) in Group 1 than Group 2 (15 vs. 0 percent; P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Diverticulitis in patients younger than aged 40 years seems to have a particularly aggressive and fulminant course and requires early surgical procedures for complications (associated abscess, colonic perforation) in 40 percent of cases. The use of "major procedure" (i.e., stoma) is more frequent in these patients.

Acute Disease↗

Management of diverticulitis of the ascending colon. 10 years' experience.

Diverticulitis of the ascending colon is an uncommon disease which mimics appendicitis. The correct diagnosis is rarely made, but can be suggested by the patterns of signs and symptoms and confirmed by barium contrast study. Diverticulitis of the ascending colon should be treated by the same plan as diverticulitis of the left colon. If the diagnosis is established, nonoperative management is indicated initially. Operation is indicated when the diagnosis is in doubt, when perforation has occurred, or when the patient does not respond to nonoperative treatment. At operation, ascending colon diverticulitis can be recognized as an inflammatory mass involving the wall and mesentery of the colon. The inflammatory mass is best treated by resection with primary anastomosis of the ileum to the ascending or transverse colon in an area removed from the site of infection.

Adult↗

Acute diverticulitis. Comparison of treatment in immunocompromised and nonimmunocompromised patients.

The clinical course and required treatment of diverticulitis were reviewed in 76 nonimmunocompromised patients and 10 immunocompromised patients. The immunocompromised patients presented with either minimal or no symptoms and findings. Therefore, to make the diagnosis of acute diverticulitis in this group, a high index of suspicion must be maintained. The required treatment varied considerably between the two groups. In 45 nonimmunocompromised patients (76 percent), medical therapy was successful. Medical treatment failed in the other 14 patients (24 percent). However, the compromised group had no patients in whom medical therapy was successful (100 percent failure rate). Thirty-one of the nonimmunocompromised patients (41 percent) required an operation, whereas 100 percent of the immunocompromised patients with acute diverticulitis required an operation. By relating postoperative complications, we were unable to determine the initial operative procedure of choice in the nonimmunocompromised group; however, in the immunocompromised group, colostomy and resection had fewer surgical complications than colostomy and drainage. The immunocompromised patient with acute diverticulitis requires operation. We believe the operation of choice is colostomy and resection of the involved segment.

Acute Disease↗

Ureteral obstruction secondary to acute sigmoid diverticulitis.

Genitourinary manifestations and complications of sigmoid diverticulitis are well recognized. These consist mainly of bladder symptoms or fistula formation. Ureteral obstruction secondary to acute sigmoid diverticulitis is rare with only 3 cases documented and reported up to the present. All 3 cases were of left ureteral obstruction. Two patients are presented with acute sigmoid diverticulitis complicated by ureteral obstruction -- one of which was obstructed bilaterally. Both patients were admitted with left lower abdominal pain and tenderness and showed elevated temperatures with leukocytosis. Neither had a significant past history of gastrointestinal or urologic disorders. Ureteral obstruction in both patients was documented preoperatively by intravenous pyelography, and postoperative resolution was documented following definitive treatment of the diverticulitis. The proximity of the sigmoid colon to the left ureter should cause more instances of this complication than is reported.

Acute Disease↗

CT of jejunal diverticulitis: imaging findings, differential diagnosis, and clinical management.

AIM: To describe the imaging findings of jejunal diverticulitis as depicted at contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and review the differential diagnosis and clinical management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT and pathology databases were searched for the diagnosis of jejunal diverticulitis. Three cases were identified and the imaging and clinical findings correlated. RESULTS: Jejunal diverticulitis presents as a focal inflammatory mass involving the proximal small bowel. A trial of medical management with antibiotics may be attempted. Surgical resection may be required if medical management is unsuccessful. CONCLUSION: The imaging findings at MDCT may allow a specific diagnosis of jejunal diverticulitis to be considered and may affect the clinical management of the patient.

Abdomen, Acute↗

Recurrent complicated colon diverticulitis in renal transplanted patient.

Colon perforation due to diverticulitis is a life-threatening complication in the postoperative course of kidney transplantation. In the immunocompromised patient a diagnosis of diverticulitis is difficult to make. We report a 53-year-old woman being kidney transplanted 14 years ago with known diverticulosis. She was admitted with acute severe pain in the lower left abdomen. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan indicated a diagnosis of intestinal abscess in the small pelvis. Laparotomy showed a covered sigma perforation with abscess located in the small pelvis (Hinchey-I). Because of the immunocompromised situation of the patient we performed a Hartmann procedure. Her postoperative course was uneventful. In a 6-month interval the intestinal continuity restoration was performed. Twelve days after discharge the patient was readmitted with reduced renal function and increased infection parameters. During physical examination the abdomen was tender. The patient complained of abdominal pain in the left upper abdomen and additional pain in the left shoulder. An antibiotic therapy using ciprofloxacin was already initiated owing to a urinary tract infection. An abdominal CT scan was performed and indicated an intestinal abscess in the left upper abdomen. Laparotomy showed an abscess involving transverse colon, distal jejunum, and proximal ileum (Hinchey-II). Segmental resection of the left colonic flexure, proximal jejunum, and ileum was performed. The postoperative course was uneventful and the patient was discharged on the 8th postoperative day. The present casuistry emphasizes that the immunocompromised patient can undergo diverticulitis twice, and that primary anastomosis is a feasible option for patients with localized peritonitis due to complicated diverticulitis.

Anastomosis, Surgical↗

Surgical management of acute sigmoid diverticulitis.

PURPOSE: To determine the frequency of use of resection and primary anastomosis in the management of acute sigmoid diverticulitis at Royal Columbian Hospital. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all patients undergoing emergency surgery for acute sigmoid diverticulitis between 1989 and 2000 at the Royal Columbian Hospital, New Westminster, BC, was carried out in order to determine the frequency of resection and primary anastomosis. Patients who underwent bowel preparation were excluded. RESULTS: Ninety-seven cases met the criteria. There were 33 cases of resection and primary anastomosis (34%). Five of these cases were protected with a proximal diverting stoma giving an incidence of 85% unprotected primary anastomosis in a group of patients undergoing emergency surgery for acute sigmoid diverticulitis. There was 1 anastomotic leak, 7 wound infections, and 3 deaths with an average length of stay of 9 days. CONCLUSIONS: The practice of resection and primary anastomosis for acute sigmoid diverticulitis at the Royal Columbian Hospital has an acceptable morbidity and mortality.

Acute Disease↗

Complications of acute diverticulitis of the colon: improved early diagnosis with computerized tomography.

We have evaluated the diagnostic role of computerized tomography in 42 patients suspected clinically of having a complication of acute diverticulitis (abscess, colovesical fistula, or both). Diverticular abscesses were confirmed at operation in 10 patients. All 10 patients were diagnosed preoperatively on computerized tomography by the triad of diverticula, a segmentally thickened colon, and extravisceral fluid collection with (6 patients) or without (4 patients) associated gas. Contrast enema study suggested the presence of a diverticular abscess in only two of eight patients studied. Colovesical fistulas were confirmed in 12 patients. Eleven of 12 were diagnosed preoperatively on computerized tomography by the triad of air in the bladder, thickened colon adjacent to an area of thickened bladder, and the presence of colonic diverticula. Contrast enema examinations demonstrated the fistula in only three of eight patients studied. The remaining 20 patients proved to have uncomplicated acute diverticulitis. Findings on computerized tomography included the presence of a segmentally thickened colon with diverticula but without the findings of an abscess or a colovesical fistula. Computerized tomography correctly visualized acute diverticular complications in 21 of 22 patients and it excluded an abscess or fistula in all 20 patients with uncomplicated acute diverticulitis who were suspected of having a diverticular complication. Computerized tomography is the most sensitive and specific test for diagnosing complications of acute diverticulitis. It should be an early consideration in patients with suspected diverticular abscesses or fistulas so that appropriate therapy is not delayed.

Abscess↗

Medical versus surgical management of diverticulitis in patients under age 40.

BACKGROUND: Diverticulitis in patients under age 40 is a distinct entity. We compared the medical versus surgical management of diverticulitis for complications and outcomes in these patients. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed for treatment, hospitalizations, complications, and outpatient visits. Complications included readmission, recurrent symptoms after antibiotic therapy, and postoperative problems. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients had a radiographic or surgical diagnosis of diverticulitis (18 surgical, 11 medical). Medically managed patients had significantly more emergency department visits (4.7 +/- 6.6 versus 0.3 +/- 0.6, P < or =0.01), and readmissions (7 versus 4, P < or =0.02). Three surgical patients (17%) had a total of 6 complications as compared with 6 medical patients (55%) with 25 complications (chi square, P < or =0.05). All medically treated patients had recurrent symptoms, and 6 required surgery. CONCLUSION: Medically managed patients had significantly more emergency department visits and complications than those managed surgically. Surgery is the indicated treatment for the first episode of diverticulitis in patients under age 40.

Adult↗

[Laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticulitis: is learning phase associated with increased morbidity?].

AIM: To assess retrospectively the results of laparoscopic sigmidectomy for diverticulitis, with intent to treat, in 58 consecutive patients operating by one surgeon compared with a control group operating by laparotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1995 to 2001, 90 consecutive patients undergoing elective sigmoid resection for diverticulitis were divided into 3 groups: laparotomy (Group 1 : n = 32), first cases of laparoscopy (Group 2 : n = 29) and last cases of laparoscopy (Group 3 : n = 29). These 3 groups were similar according to age, sex, Body Mass Index (BMI), American society of anesthesia score (ASA), previous abdominal surgery, number of attacks of diverticulitis, and time between last attack and surgery. Following criteria were studied: operating time, conversation rate, intra-operative and post-operative morbidity, return of intestinal transit, and hospital stay. RESULTS: During laparoscopy, conversion was mandatory in 24% of the cases (7/29) in group 2 and 14% in group 3 (4/29; NS). No intra-operative morbidity was noted in the 58 laparoscopies. Mean operative time was 240 min in group 1, 259 min in group 2, and 241 min in group 3 (NS). Postoperative morbidity was observed in 31% of patients in group 1, 34% in group 2, and 10% in group 3 (p = 0.02). Returm of intestinal transit and oral ingestion and mean hospital stay were significantly shorter in group 2 and group 3 versus group 1 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our results confirm previous data demonstrating faisability of laparoscopic sigmodectomy for diverticulitis and its benefice in terms of return of intestinal transit and hospital stay. Furthermore, our study suggest that when surgeon gain experience, conversion rate, morbidity and operative time can be reduced.

Adult↗