Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Clarithromycin”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 163 records · Page 9Linked to original sources
PubMed1996

Clarithromycin against Mycobacterium avium complex infections.

The turning point in antimicrobial therapy of Mycobacterium avium infections came with the development of two new macrolides, clarithromycin and azithromycin. Controlled clinical trials, the first ever conducted with any agent among patients with M. avium infection, indicated the high efficiency of clarithromycin, in either acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) patients having a disseminated infection or non-AIDS patients with localized pulmonary disease. Monotherapy with clarithromycin resulted in elimination of bacteremia in almost all patients with disseminated infection, which is inevitably followed by a relapse of bacteremia in patients who survived long enough to reach this event. The strains susceptible to clarithromycin isolated before therapy contained 10(-8) or 10(-9) resistant mutants, and the relapses of bacteremia were caused by multiplication of these pre-existing mutants. Clarithromycin-resistance was associated with a mutation in the 23S rRNA gene. Cross-resistance between clarithromycin and azithromycin was confirmed with laboratory mutants and clinical isolates. At least two methods for determining the susceptibility of the M. avium isolates to clarithromycin are available: one is minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination on Mueller-Hinton agar (pH 7.4) supplemented with 10% Oleic acid-albumin-dextrose catalase, the other is MIC determination in 7H12 broth, also at pH 7.4. The breakpoints for 'susceptible' for these methods are < or = 8.0 micrograms/ml and < or = 2.0 micrograms/ml, respectively. The breakpoints for 'resistant' are > 128 micrograms/ml for the agar method and > 32.0 micrograms/ml for the broth method. The predictability value of MIC determination was confirmed by comparing the test results with the patients' clinical and bacteriological response to therapy. The remaining major problem in the therapy of the M. avium infections is a selection of companion drugs to be used in combination with clarithromycin (or azithromycin) to prevent the emergence of the macrolide-resistance. A number of clinical trials are now in progress to find a solution to this problem.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗
PubMed2001

Five days of cefprozil versus 10 days of clarithromycin in the treatment of an acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.

BACKGROUND: Shorter than traditional 7- to 14-day treatment regimens have demonstrated efficacy in treatment of an acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB). OBJECTIVE: Perform a clinical efficacy study comparing 5 days of cefprozil therapy to 10 days of clarithromycin in treating an AECB. METHODS: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind study comparing efficacy and safety of cefprozil, 500 mg twice daily, for 5 days with clarithromycin, 500 mg twice daily, for 10 days in treatment of 295 subjects with AECB. Concomitantly, among all treated subjects, 39% (115 of 295) had a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/emphysema; 21% (62 of 295) had a history of asthma/reactive airway disease; and 31% (90 of 295) had environmental allergies. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences among clinically evaluable subjects' cure rates; 82% (109 of 133) treated with cefprozil versus 85% (105 of 123) treated with clarithromycin were cured at test-of-cure visit (95% confidence interval, -12.0 to 5.1%). Clinical cure rates at end of study were 80% and 81%, respectively (95% confidence interval, -10.8 to 7.9%). Before treatment, 99% (85 of 86) of Gram-positive organisms isolated were susceptible to cefprozil and 78% (67 of 86) were susceptible to clarithromycin. A total of 84% (96 of 114) of Gram-negative organisms were susceptible to cefprozil and 63% (72 of 114) were susceptible to clarithromycin. Of clinically evaluable Streptococcus pneumoniae-infected subjects, 100% (11 of 11) of cefprozil subjects and 93% (14 of 15) of clarithromycin subjects experienced clinical cure. The most frequently reported adverse effects were nausea, 5% (7 of 150), and diarrhea, 9% (14 of 150), for cefprozil. For clarithromycin, the adverse effects were nausea, 8% (11 of 145); diarrhea, 12% (18 of 145); taste perversion, 8% (11 of 145); and dry mouth, 5% (7 of 145). CONCLUSIONS: Five days of cefprozil is as effective as 10 days of clarithromycin for treatment of an AECB.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Effects of oral clarithromycin and amoxycillin on interdigestive gastrointestinal motility of patients with functional dyspepsia and Helicobacter pylori gastritis.

BACKGROUND: Clarithromycin and amoxycillin are antibiotics commonly used in association for Helicobacter pylori eradication. Because this treatment, which lasts 1-2 weeks, is frequently associated with gastrointestinal symptoms, we investigated the effects of these antibiotics on gastrointestinal motility. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Gastroduodenal motility was recorded in 14 patients with functional dyspepsia and H. pylori gastritis by means of a low-compliance manometric system with four recording ports in the stomach and four in the duodenum. Two tablets of clarithromycin 250 mg (seven patients, clarithromycin group) or one of amoxycillin 1 g (seven patients, amoxycillin group), ground and dissolved in 20 mL of water, were given randomly and in double-blind manner 30 min after the end of the first activity front (AF) of the migrating motor complex (MMC) or, in the absence of AFs, after at least 200 min of recording. Recording continued until an AF was observed during the subsequent 200 min. RESULTS: Clarithromycin administration was followed by a typical gastroduodenal AF in a significantly higher number of patients than for amoxycillin administration. In addition, the time lag between clarithromycin administration and the appearance of AFs was 48 min +/- 8.5 (mean +/- s.d.), significantly shorter than after amoxycillin (121 min +/- 29). The clarithromycin-related duodenal AFs showed a duration of 6.6 min +/- 1.5, significantly longer than that of the spontaneous AFs (3.6 min +/- 1.2, P < 0.01), while the amoxycillin-related AFs were not significantly different from the spontaneous ones. CONCLUSION: Clarithromycin stimulated cyclic gastroduodenal motility, while amoxycillin was ineffective. It is likely that symptoms during the eradication treatment are due to this effect of clarithromycin.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2003

Effect of different proton pump inhibitors, differences in CYP2C19 genotype and antibiotic resistance on the eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori infection by a 1-week regimen of proton pump inhibitor, amoxicillin and clarithromycin.

AIM: To investigate the effect of different proton pump inhibitors, S-mephenytoin 4'-hydroxylase (CYP2C19) genotype and antibiotic susceptibility on the eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori. METHODS: One hundred and eighty-seven H. pylori-infected peptic ulcer patients were randomly treated with either rabeprazole (10 mg b.d.) or lansoprazole (30 mg b.d.) plus amoxicillin (750 mg b.d.) and clarithromycin (400 mg b.d.) for 1 week. The antibiotic susceptibility and CYP2C19 genotype (extensive or poor metabolizer) were investigated. RESULTS: The eradication rates in the rabeprazole-amoxicillin-clarithromycin (RAC) and lansoprazole-amoxicillin-clarithromycin (LAC) groups were 75% and 69%, respectively, on an intention-to-treat basis, and 80% and 75%, respectively, on a per protocol basis. The eradication rate for clarithromycin-resistant strains was significantly lower than that for clarithromycin-sensitive strains (24% vs. 86%, P < 0.05). For clarithromycin-sensitive strains in the LAC group, there was a tendency for a lower eradication rate in extensive than poor metabolizers. The eradication rate in extensive metabolizers in the RAC group tended to be higher than that in extensive metabolizers in the LAC group (89% vs. 78%, P = 0.079726). CONCLUSIONS: The success of the 1-week proton pump inhibitor-amoxicillin-clarithromycin regimen depends on the susceptibility of H. pylori to clarithromycin. Moreover, differences in CYP2C19 genotype influence the eradication rates of lansoprazole-based therapy, and the rabeprazole-based regimen has an advantage especially in extensive metabolizers.

2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles↗
PubMed2003

Contribution of increased oral bioavailability and reduced nonglomerular renal clearance of digoxin to the digoxin-clarithromycin interaction.

AIMS: A clinically important interaction between the cardiac glycoside digoxin and the antibiotic clarithromycin has been suggested in earlier reports. The aim of this study was to investigate the extent of the interaction and the relative contribution of different mechanisms. METHODS: In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind cross-over design single oral doses of 0.75 mg digoxin with oral coadministration of placebo or 250 mg clarithromycin twice daily for 3 days were administered to 12 healthy men. Additionally, three of the subjects received single intravenous doses of 0.01 mg x kg(-1) digoxin with oral placebo or clarithromycin. Digoxin plasma and urine concentrations were determined by a highly sensitive radioimmunoassay. RESULTS: Oral coadministration of clarithromycin resulted in a 1.7-fold increase of the area under the digoxin plasma concentration-time curve [mean AUC(0,24) +/- SD 23 +/- 5.2 vs. 14 +/- 2.9 microg x L(-1) x h; 95% confidence interval (CI) on the difference 7.0, 12; P = 0.002] and in a reduction of the nonglomerular renal clearance of digoxin [mean ClRng(0, 24) +/- SD 34 +/- 39 vs. 57 +/- 41 mL min-1; 95% CI on the difference 7.2, 45; P = 0.03]. The ratios of mean digoxin plasma concentrations with and without clarithromycin were highest during the absorption period of clarithromycin. After intravenous administration digoxin AUC(0,24) increased only 1.2-fold during coadministration of clarithromycin. CONCLUSIONS: Increased oral bioavailability and reduced nonglomerular renal clearance of digoxin both contribute to the interaction between digoxin and clarithromycin, probably due to inhibition of intestinal and renal P-glycoprotein.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1996

Inhibitory effect of clarithromycin on costimulatory molecule expression and cytokine production by synovial fibroblast-like cells.

This study was undertaken to investigate the immunomodulatory effect of clarithromycin against synovial fibroblast-like cells (synoviocytes). Synovial tissue obtained from rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or osteoarthritis (OA) patients was enzymatically digested to separate synoviocytes. The synoviocytes were cultured with or without cytokines in the presence of various concentrations of clarithromycin. The expression of costimulatory molecules was examined on the surface of the synoviocytes, using specific MoAbs and flow cytometry. The production of cytokines by synoviocytes was also measured using an immunoenzymatic assay. Finally, autologous T cells were stimulated by interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma)-treated synoviocytes in response to purified protein derivative (PPD). In some experiments, MoAbs specific for costimulatory molecules or clarithromycin were added and 3H-thymidine incorporation was counted. Intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), LFA-3 and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) were detected on the surface of both RA and OA synoviocytes. However, ICAM-2, B7-1 and B7-2 were not detected, and cytokines failed to induce these molecules. Both spontaneous and up-regulated expression of ICAM-1, LFA-3 and VCAM-1 by IFN-gamma, IL-1beta or 12-o-tetradecanoyl phorbol 13-acetate (TPA) were markedly suppressed by clarithromycin in a dose-dependent manner at concentrations between 0.1 and 10 microg/ml. The production of IL-1beta, IL-6, IL-8, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) but not IL-1alpha and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) by synoviocytes was detected. Clarithromycin significantly suppressed the production of these cytokines, but did not enhance IL-10 production. Finally, autologous T cells were stimulated by IFN-gamma-treated synoviocytes in response to PPD. As clarithromycin suppressed HLA-DR and costimulatory molecule expression was enhanced by IFN-gamma, autologous T cell proliferation was markedly inhibited by clarithromycin. Clarithromycin has a considerable immunosuppressive effect on synoviocytes by inhibiting costimulatory molecule expression, cytokine production and antigen-specific T cell proliferation induced by synoviocytes.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed2001

The efficacy and safety of two oral moxifloxacin regimens compared to oral clarithromycin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.

An international multi-centre, randomized, prospective, double-blind study compared oral moxifloxacin (200 mg or 400 mg once daily for 10 days) with oral clarithromycin (500 mg, twice daily for 10 days) in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). The clinical success rate in the evaluable population at the primary efficacy assessment, 3-5 days after the end of study treatment, was 93.9% in patients treated with 200 mg moxifloxacin; 94.4%, with 400 mg moxifloxacin; and 94.3%, with clarithromycin. Clinical success rates were maintained at follow-up, 21-28 days after the end of treatment: 90.7% (200 mg moxifloxacin), 92.8% (400 mg moxifloxacin) and 92.2% (clarithromycin). The 95% confidence intervals indicated that all three treatment regimens were equally effective in treating CAP. At follow-up, the 400 mg moxifloxacin dose had a slightly higher observed cure rate than the 200 mg moxifloxacin dose, but this was not statistically significant. The most frequently isolated pathogens were Streptococcus pneumoniae (42%), Haemophilus influenzae (19%), Haemophilus parainfluenzae (10%), Moraxella catarrhalis (6%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (5%) and Staphylococcus aureus (4%). The bacteriological success rate (eradication and presumed eradication) was 72.5% (29/40) for 200 mg moxifloxacin, 78.7% (37/47) for 400 mg moxifloxacin and 70.7% (29/41) for clarithromycin. The adverse event profile was comparable between the three treatment groups. Most adverse events, possibly or probably related to the study drug, were generally mild or moderate in severity and mostly related to the digestive system: diarrhoea, nausea and abdominal pain in 200 mg moxifloxacin patients; diarrhoea, liver function abnormalities and nausea in 400 mg moxifloxacin patients and liver function abnormalities, diarrhoea, nausea and taste perversion in clarithromycin patients. Study drugs were discontinued because of adverse events in 7/229 (3%) patients treated with 200 mg moxifloxacin, 11/224 (5%) with moxifloxacin 400 mg and 11/222 (5%) with clarithromycin. In all assessments, moxifloxacin was at least as effective clinically, and as well tolerated as clarithromycin in the treatment of CAP. Bacteriological success rates in moxifloxacin-treated patients were greater than those of clarithromycin. Moxifloxacin, given once daily, is free of many drug-drug interactions and requires no dosage adjustments in most renal hepatic deficient patients.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1993

[Clarithromycin, a new macrolide antibiotic. Effectiveness in puerperal infections and pharmacokinetics in breast milk].

The aims of this study were, to determine the pharmacokinetic parameters of clarithromycin and to study the passage of the drug into breast milk. Twelve patients (age 24 to 38; weight 44 to 83 kg), suffering from puerperal infections, were treated orally with 250 mg clarithromycin b.i.d. for 6 days. Samples of blood and breast milk were taken at timed intervals. The specimens were assayed for clarithromycin and its active metabolite 14-hydroxy-clarithromycin by HPLC and electrochemical detection. Serum concentrations of clarithromycin in the investigated patients were higher than those reported in healthy volunteers. The mean peak concentrations of clarithromycin and 14-hydroxy-clarithromycin in breast milk were about 25%, and 75% respectively of the corresponding serum concentrations. All patients recovered within 2 to 4 days and no drug-associated side effects (eg. gastrointestinal) were noted. Clarithromycin appears to be an appropriate antibiotic for the treatment of puerperal infections and (because of its considerable concentrations in breast milk) for puerperal mastitis as well.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2000

The steady-state disposition of indinavir is not altered by the concomitant administration of clarithromycin.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and potential pharmacokinetic interaction between indinavir and clarithromycin. STUDY METHODS: In a randomized, three-period, crossover fashion, 12 healthy adults received the following for 1 week: 800 mg oral indinavir sulfate every 8 hours with placebo, 500 mg oral clarithromycin every 12 hours with placebo, and indinavir sulfate with clarithromycin. Plasma indinavir, clarithromycin, and 14-hydroxyclarithromycin concentrations were determined after the last dose in each treatment period. RESULTS: Administration of indinavir sulfate with clarithromycin caused a statistically significant increase in four pharmacokinetic parameters: a 58% increase in plasma indinavir concentrations at 8 hours (P = .029), a 47% increase in values for clarithromycin area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time zero to the last measured concentration [AUC(0-12h); P = .0002], and 49% and 48% decreases in 14-hydroxyclarithromycin AUC(0-12h) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) values, respectively (P = .0001 and P = .0001). These effects are not considered to be clinically significant in view of the insignificant effects on the values for indinavir area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time zero to the last measured concentration [AUC(0-8h)] and Cmax, as well as the safety profile of clarithromycin. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of indinavir sulfate and clarithromycin is generally well tolerated and can be coadministered without dose adjustment.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2001

Evaluation of the immunomodulatory effects of the macrolide antibiotic, clarithromycin, in female B6C3F1 mice: a 28-day oral gavage study.

The macrolide antibiotic, clarithromycin, is used extensively to treat bacterial infections associated with pneumonia, duodenal ulcers, and the advanced stages of human immunodeficiency viral (HIV) infection. In addition to its antimicrobial properties, several studies have indicated that clarithromycin also has anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties. In this study, clarithromycin's immunomodulatory properties were evaluated using female B6C3F1 mice and a panel of immune assays that were designed to evaluate potential changes in innate, and acquired cellular and humoral immune responses. Female B6C3F1 mice were treated daily by gavage with clarithromycin (0, 125, 250, and 500 mg/kg) for 28 days then evaluated for immunomodulation. Minimal immunological changes were observed after 28 days of treatment. A slight increase in the number of spleen antibody-forming cells was observed at the 250 mg/kg treatment level, but not at other doses. Serum IgM levels were unaffected by the clarithromycin treatment. A significant increase in the number of splenic macrophages was also observed in mice treated with 125 mg/kg of clarithromycin, but this increase was not observed at the other treatment levels. Innate and cell-mediated immunity, as measured by natural killer cell activity, and mixed leukocyte and cytotoxic T cell response, respectively, were unchanged following treatment with clarithromycin. These results suggest that the immune system is not a target for clarithromycin at doses of 500 mg/kg or below.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗
PubMed1991

Comparative study of clarithromycin and roxithromycin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.

The efficacy and tolerance of clarithromycin (250 mg twice daily) were compared with those of roxithromycin (150 mg twice daily) in an open, multicentre trial of 77 inpatients with community-acquired pneumonia. Sixty-five patients were clinically evaluable (34, clarithromycin; 31 roxithromycin). Efficacy was comparable between treatment groups: 26 of 34 patients (76%) treated with clarithromycin were clinically cured, including four with atypical pneumonia. In the roxithromycin group 25 of 31 patients (81%) were clinically cured and one was improved. Cough, appearance of sputum, and fever improved in most patients in both treatment groups. Chest X-rays after treatment showed resolution or improvement in 76% of patients who received clarithromycin and 87% of those who received roxithromycin. The clinical evaluation of the response generally agreed with the bacteriological response. Among patients who were bacteriologically evaluable for four target organisms (Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, H. parainfluenzae, and Branhamella catarrhalis) the pathogen was eradicated in four of seven (57%) in the clarithromycin-treated group and in five of six (83%) in the roxithromycin-treated group. Adverse events were reported in more patients who received roxithromycin (21.6%) than in those who received clarithromycin (12.5%) although the incidences were not statistically significantly different. The majority of adverse events were transient increases in serum alanine aminotransferase, serum aspartate aminotransferase, and alkaline phosphatase. Clarithromycin was shown to be effective and well-tolerated; the clinical efficacy and safety of clarithromycin and roxithromycin were comparable.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Comparison of azithromycin versus clarithromycin in the treatment of patients with lower respiratory tract infection.

The efficacy and safety of azithromycin and clarithromycin in lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) were compared in an open, multicentre study. Five hundred and ten adult patients with a diagnosis of LRTI, including acute bronchitis, acute infective exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AIECB) or pneumonia were enrolled. The patients were randomly assigned to receive either azithromycin (n = 252) as a single daily dose of 500 mg for three days, or clarithromycin (n = 258) 250 mg twice daily for ten days. In AIECB patients, baseline comparisons of the two treatment groups showed that there were no differences in the number of previous episodes of infection or in the incidence of current or past smokers. The overall clinical efficacy was found to be similar in each treatment group on day 10 to 14, with a satisfactory response (cured or improved) in 94% of azithromycin- and 97% of clarithromycin-treated patients. At follow-up evaluation (day 18 to 22), 97% of azithromycin- and 100% of clarithromycin-treated patients who had improved at day 10 to 14, showed satisfactory outcomes. Bacteriological efficacy was similar in both treatment groups, with eradication of 100% vs 95% of isolates in the azithromycin and clarithromycin groups, respectively. In AIECB, 100% of pathogens were eradicated by azithromycin, although one patient was clinically assessed as failed. Clarithromycin eradicated 93% of pathogens in this group; all patients being assessed as cured or improved. Both drugs were well tolerated, with 9% and 6% of patients reporting adverse events with azithromycin and clarithromycin, respectively. These adverse events were largely gastrointestinal in origin. It was concluded that a three-day course of azithromycin is as effective and well tolerated as a ten-day course of clarithromycin in adults with acute LRTIs.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2000

Pharmacokinetics and comparative effects of telithromycin (HMR 3647) and clarithromycin on the oropharyngeal and intestinal microflora.

The pharmacokinetics in plasma and saliva of a new ketolide, telithromycin (HMR 3647), and the effect on the normal oropharyngeal and intestinal microflora were studied in healthy volunteers and compared with those of clarithromycin. Ten subjects received 800 mg telithromycin perorally once daily and 10 other subjects received 500 mg clarithromycin bid for 10 days. Blood, saliva and faecal specimens were collected at defined intervals before, during and after administration for pharmacokinetic and microbiological analyses. In subjects receiving telithromycin, the mean C:(max), AUC and C:(24) (24 h) in saliva exceeded the values obtained from plasma, while saliva and serum pharmacokinetic parameters were in the same range for the clarithromycin group. The quantitative ecological disturbances in the normal microflora during administration of telithromycin were moderate and comparable to those associated with clarithromycin administration. No overgrowth of yeasts or Clostridium difficile occurred. Emergence of resistant strains was seen in both treatment groups. Administration of both telithromycin and clarithromycin was associated with significant increases in MICs for intestinal Bacteroides isolates, which persisted 2 weeks after discontinuation of treatment. In addition, a significant emergence of highly clarithromycin-resistant alpha-haemolytic streptococci, intestinal enterococci and Enterobacteriaceae was detected at day 10 in the clarithromycin group. In conclusion, administration of telithromycin resulted in high drug levels in saliva, which indicates a good therapeutic profile for throat infections. Telithromycin seems to have a more favourable ecological profile compared with clarithromycin in terms of resistance development in the normal microflora.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2003

Steady-state plasma and bronchopulmonary characteristics of clarithromycin extended-release tablets in normal healthy adult subjects.

OBJECTIVES: The steady-state concentrations of clarithromycin in plasma were compared with concomitant concentrations in epithelial lining fluid (ELF) and alveolar macrophages (AM) obtained from intrapulmonary samples during bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). Concentrations of the major metabolite, 14-hydroxyclarithromycin, were also determined in plasma and AM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-two healthy, non-smoking adult subjects (age: 18-54 years; 19 females, 23 males) received oral clarithromycin extended-release formulation (1000 mg once daily for five consecutive days). Bronchoscopy and BAL were carried out once in each subject at either 3, 6, 9, 12, 24 or 48 h after the last administered dose of clarithromycin. In addition, three subjects who did not take clarithromycin served as controls and underwent bronchoscopy at 0 h. Drug concentrations in plasma, ELF, and AM were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: Clarithromycin was extensively concentrated in ELF [range of mean (+/-s.d.) concentrations: 6.38 +/- 3.92 to 11.50 +/- 6.65 mg/L] and AM (127.0 +/- 61.5 to 573.8 +/- 309.3 mg/L) than simultaneous plasma concentration (0.75 +/- 0.31 to 2.22 +/- 0.72 mg/L). The ranges of mean (+/-s.d.) concentrations of 14-hydroxyclarithromycin in plasma and AM were 0.52 +/- 0.29 to 0.80 +/- 0.31 mg/L and 22.1 +/- 13.5 to 49.5 +/- 16.2 mg/L, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily dosing of extended-release formulation clarithromycin 1000 mg produced significantly (P < 0.05) higher steady-state concentrations of clarithromycin in ELF (2-14 times) and AM (50-700 times) compared to simultaneous plasma concentrations throughout the 24 h period after drug administration. The 14-hydroxy metabolite of clarithromycin achieved significantly (P < 0.05) higher steady-state concentrations in AM (18-180 times) compared with concurrent plasma concentrations.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Carbamazepine toxicity induced by clarithromycin coadministration in psychiatric patients.

Seven psychiatric inpatients receiving carbamazepine 600 mg/day were coadministered clarithromycin 400 mg/day for 5 days to treat atypical pneumonia. Blood samples were taken after clarithromycin coadministration and at 1 and 4 weeks after its discontinuation. Plasma concentrations of carbamazepine and carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography. During clarithromycin coadministration, four out of the seven patients developed moderate-to-severe toxic symptoms of carbamazepine, such as drowsiness, dizziness, and ataxia, which resolved within 5 days after clarithromycin discontinuation. In these four patients, plasma carbamazepine concentrations after clarithromycin coadministration were approximately twice as high as those after its discontinuation. In the seven patients, the mean plasma concentration of carbamazepine, but not of carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide, after clarithromycin coadministration was significantly (p < 0.01) higher than those at 1 and 4 weeks after its discontinuation. The present report suggests that clarithromycin coadministration induces increased plasma carbamazepine concentrations, which may result in carbamazepine toxicity. Therefore, care should be given to prescribing clarithromycin for patients receiving carbamazepine.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Effects of clarithromycin on cultured human nasal epithelial cells and fibroblasts.

OBJECTIVE/METHODS: Long-term administration of clarithromycin has been reported to be effective in the treatment of chronic sinusitis. To investigate the mechanism underlying the anti-inflammatory activity of clarithromycin, the authors evaluated the effect of clarithromycin on the gene expression of proinflammatory cytokine and the DNA-binding activity of nuclear factor (NF)-kappa B in cultured human nasal epithelial cells and fibroblasts. Cells were incubated with endotoxin purified from nontypable Haemophilus influenzae or interleukin (IL)-1 beta in the presence of clarithromycin. RESULTS: Northern blot analysis revealed that clarithromycin suppressed IL-1 beta gene expression in human nasal epithelial cells stimulated by H. influenzae endotoxin (HIE). Intercellular adhesion molecule-1 gene expression in nasal fibroblasts stimulated by IL-1 beta was also suppressed by clarithromycin. Furthermore, electrophoretic mobility shift assay demonstrated that clarithromycin reduced DNA-binding activity of NF-kappa B in both human nasal epithelial cells and fibroblasts stimulated by HIE or IL-1 beta, respectively. CONCLUSION: The present results suggest that clarithromycin may reduce gene expression of proinflammatory cytokines and adhesion molecules from nasal mucosa at the transcriptional factor level and exert an anti-inflammatory effect on nasal mucosa in chronic sinusitis.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed2004

Effect of clarithromycin on nuclear factor-kappa B and transforming growth factor-beta in chronic rhinosinusitis.

OBJECTIVES: Long-term, low-dose macrolide therapy is effective in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis. It is believed that macrolide antibiotics produce this benefit through an anti-inflammatory effect. In this study, the effect of clarithromycin treatment on the expression of transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta and the key pro-inflammatory nuclear transcription factor, NF-kappa B, was examined in vitro and in vivo. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In vitro: nasal mucosa was obtained from 10 patients with chronic sinusitis and was cultured for 24 hours in the presence of clarithromycin or control. Cellular expression of TGF-beta and NF-kappa B was determined by immunohistochemistry. In vivo: 10 patients with chronic rhinosinusitis were treated for 3 months with clarithromycin. Nasal mucosal biopsies were taken pre- and posttreatment. Cellular expression of TGF-beta and NF-kappa B was again determined by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Clarithromycin, when applied to nasal biopsies in vitro, reduced cellular expression of TGF-beta and NF-kappa B. Nasal biopsies taken before and after clarithromycin treatment showed no differences in cellular expression of NF-kappa B or TGF-beta. CONCLUSION: Clarithromycin can reduce cellular expression of TGF-beta and NF-kappa B when applied in vitro, but its action during clinical therapy is less clear. Clarithromycin is capable of inhibiting pro-inflammatory cytokines in vitro, and reductions of TGF-beta and NF-kappa B may represent additional mechanisms by which macrolides reduce inflammation in chronic airway disease. Discrepancies between the actions of clarithromycin on nasal biopsies in vitro and after clinical therapy warrant further investigation.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Extent and spectrum of the antimicrobial activity of clarithromycin.

Clarithromycin, a new semisynthetic macrolide, is lipophilic and achieves concentrations in tissue that are generally 10 times greater than concentrations achieved in serum. Its binding to serum proteins is low and reversible. Clarithromycin has in vitro and in vivo activity against a variety of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, Mycoplasma, Chlamydia and mycobacteria. 14-Hydroxyclarithromycin, the major metabolite of clarithromycin in humans, is generally as active as clarithromycin against these organisms but is more active in vitro and in vivo than clarithromycin against Haemophilus influenzae. Organisms resistant to erythromycin by plasmid or transposon-encoded methylase, macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin resistance, are also resistant to clarithromycin. Unlike older macrolides, however, clarithromycin has in vitro and in vivo activity against atypical mycobacteria. The antimicrobial activities of clarithromycin and 14-hydroxyclarithromycin are reviewed in this article.

Animals↗