Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “ARF”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 163 records · Page 9Linked to original sources

Pediatric ARF epidemiology at a tertiary care center from 1999 to 2001.

BACKGROUND: Previous epidemiological data for pediatric patients with acute renal failure (ARF) predate current intensive care unit (ICU) technology and practice, and do not reflect newer disease therapies for bone marrow, hepatic, and cardiac transplantation and congenital heart disease surgery. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 254 ARF episodes in 248 children discharged from a tertiary referral center, Texas Children's Hospital (Houston, TX), between January 1998 and June 2001 to update current pediatric ARF epidemiological characteristics. RESULTS: The most common causes of ARF were renal ischemia (21%), nephrotoxic medications (16%), and sepsis (11%). Primary renal diseases accounted for only 17 cases (7%), and hemolytic uremic syndrome accounted for only 3 cases. Overall ARF survival for the entire cohort was 176 of 254 patients (70%), whereas 110 of 185 patients (60%) requiring ICU admission and 43 of 77 patients (56%) receiving renal replacement therapy survived. CONCLUSION: These current pediatric ARF data show that pediatric ARF epidemiological characteristics have changed from primary renal disease to renal involvement secondary to other systemic illness. Longitudinal data from this cohort are underway to determine the long-term sequelae of pediatric ARF.

Acute Kidney Injury↗

Both p16(Ink4a) and the p19(Arf)-p53 pathway constrain progression of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in the mouse.

Activating KRAS mutations and p16(Ink4a) inactivation are near universal events in human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). In mouse models, Kras(G12D) initiates formation of premalignant pancreatic ductal lesions, and loss of either Ink4a/Arf (p16(Ink4a)/p19(Arf)) or p53 enables their malignant progression. As recent mouse modeling studies have suggested a less prominent role for p16(Ink4a) in constraining malignant progression, we sought to assess the pathological and genomic impact of inactivation of p16(Ink4a), p19(Arf), and/or p53 in the Kras(G12D) model. Rapidly progressive PDAC was observed in the setting of homozygous deletion of either p53 or p16(Ink4a), the latter with intact germ-line p53 and p19(Arf) sequences. Additionally, Kras(G12D) in the context of heterozygosity either for p53 plus p16(Ink4a) or for p16(Ink4a)/p19(Arf) produced PDAC with longer latency and greater propensity for distant metastases relative to mice with homozygous deletion of p53 or p16(Ink4a)/p19(Arf). Tumors from the double-heterozygous cohorts showed frequent p16(Ink4a) inactivation and loss of either p53 or p19(Arf). Different genotypes were associated with specific histopathologic characteristics, most notably a trend toward less differentiated features in the homozygous p16(Ink4a)/p19(Arf) mutant model. High-resolution genomic analysis revealed that the tumor suppressor genotype influenced the specific genomic patterns of these tumors and showed overlap in regional chromosomal alterations between murine and human PDAC. Collectively, our results establish that disruptions of p16(Ink4a) and the p19(ARF)-p53 circuit play critical and cooperative roles in PDAC progression, with specific tumor suppressor genotypes provocatively influencing the tumor biological phenotypes and genomic profiles of the resultant tumors.

Adenocarcinoma↗

ARF mutation accelerates pituitary tumor development in Rb+/- mice.

Mice heterozygous for the retinoblastoma (Rb) tumor suppressor gene develop pituitary and thyroid tumors with high penetrance. We demonstrate here that loss of the ARF tumor suppressor strongly accelerates intermediate lobe pituitary tumorigenesis in Rb heterozygous mice. These effects in the pituitary are greater than those conferred by p53 loss in that Rb+-;ARF-- mice display significantly more early atypical lesions than Rb+-; p53-- mice. Also, Rb+-;ARF-- compound mutants do not develop many of the novel tumors or precancerous lesions seen in Rb+-;p53-- compound mutants. Although complete loss of ARF expression is not obligatory for pituitary tumorigenesis in Rb+- mice, alterations of the ARF locus are observed in tumors from Rb+-;ARF+- mice, consistent with a selective advantage of ARF inactivation in this context. We conclude that inactivation of ARF acts more broadly than that of p53 in connecting abrogation of the Rb pathway to tumorigenesis.

Animals↗

p19(Arf) induces p53-dependent apoptosis during abelson virus-mediated pre-B cell transformation.

The Ink4a/Arf locus encodes p16(Ink4a) and p19(Arf) and is among the most frequently mutated tumor suppressor loci in human cancer. In mice, many of these effects appear to be mediated by interactions between p19(Arf) and the p53 tumor-suppressor protein. Because Tp53 mutations are a common feature of the multistep pre-B cell transformation process mediated by Abelson murine leukemia virus (Ab-MLV), we examined the possibility that proteins encoded by the Ink4a/Arf locus also play a role in Abelson virus transformation. Analyses of primary transformants revealed that both p16(Ink4a) and p19(Arf) are expressed in many of the cells as they emerge from the apoptotic crisis that characterizes the transformation process. Analyses of primary transformants from Ink4a/Arf null mice revealed that these cells bypassed crisis. Because expression of p19(Arf) but not p16 (Ink4a) induced apoptosis in Ab-MLV-transformed pre-B cells, p19(Arf) appears to be responsible for these events. Consistent with the link between p19(Arf) and p53, Ink4a/Arf expression correlates with or precedes the emergence of cells expressing mutant p53. These data demonstrate that p19(Arf) is an important part of the cellular defense mounted against transforming signals from the Abl oncoprotein and provide direct evidence that the p19(Arf)-p53 regulatory loop plays an important role in lymphoma induction.

3T3 Cells↗

Resolved phospholipase D activity is modulated by cytosolic factors other than Arf.

Phospholipase D, which has been extracted from porcine brain membranes and chromatographically enriched 100-fold, was activated better by impure preparations of Arf than by purified or recombinant Arf. Examination of brain cytosol with this enriched preparation of PLD activity revealed at least three stimulatory components. One of these is Arf or the first cytoplasmic factor. A second peak of PLD-stimulating activity (cytoplasmic factor II, CFII) was resolved from Arf by anion exchange and gel filtration. This CFII can be further separated into multiple activities by chromatography with heparin-agarose. The activities were differentiated by their stimulatory properties as measured in the absence or presence of guanosine 5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) (GTP gamma S) alone and in the presence of added Arf and GTP gamma S. While all of the CFII pools stimulated PLD activity to some degree and showed synergistic activation when administered in conjunction with Arf, they could be classified into two groups with distinct behavior. When used together, pools from the two respective groups showed synergistic activation of PLD. The first set of pools contained the RhoA monomeric G protein. Recombinant RhoA was used to show that it could indeed activate this enriched PLD activity and act synergistically with Arf proteins. A related monomeric G protein, Cdc42, was also effective. The second set of CFII pools were devoid of RhoA and, in contrast to the first group, demonstrated significant stimulating activity in the absence of guanine nucleotides. These data indicate that the PLD activity from brain can be modulated by several cytosolic factors and that Arf-sensitive PLD may represent a complex activity that can be regulated in an interactive fashion by a variety of cellular signaling events.

ADP-Ribosylation Factors↗

Germline mutation of ARF in a melanoma kindred.

Familial melanoma predisposition is associated with germline mutations at the CDKN2A/ARF locus in up to 40% of families. The exact role of the two proteins encoded by this complex locus in this predisposition is unclear. Most mutations affect either CDKN2A only or products of both genes. Recently a deletion affecting ARF-specific exon 1beta was reported in a family with melanoma and neural tumours. However, the possibility of this deletion also altering the CDKN2A transcript could not be excluded. More convincingly, a 16 base pair insertion in exon 1beta has been reported in an individual with multiple melanomas suggesting a direct role for ARF in melanoma predisposition. We report here a splice mutation in exon 1beta in a family with melanoma that results in ARF haploinsufficiency. The mutation was observed in a mother and daughter with melanoma. A sibling of the mother with breast cancer also had this mutation. Analysis of the melanoma from one individual revealed a 62 bp deletion in exon 3 of the wildtype allele and loss of the mutant allele; these somatic changes would affect both CDKN2A and ARF. These somatic events suggest that concomitant inactivation of both ARF and CDKN2A may be necessary for melanoma development and that mutations in ARF and CDKN2A possibly confer different levels of susceptibility to melanoma, with the former associated with lesser predisposition. In this situation, the events follow a 'three-hit' model as observed in tumours from FAP patients with an attenuated phenotype. Overall, the data suggest a direct role for ARF haploinsufficiency in melanoma predisposition and co-operation between ARF and CDKN2A in tumour formation, consistent with recent observations in Cdkn2a-specific knockout mice.

Adult↗

The human ARF cell cycle regulatory gene promoter is a CpG island which can be silenced by DNA methylation and down-regulated by wild-type p53.

The INK4a/ARF locus encodes two proteins involved in tumor suppression in a manner virtually unique in mammalian cells. Distinct first exons, driven from separate promoters, splice onto a common exon 2 and 3 but utilize different reading frames to produce two completely distinct proteins, both of which play roles in cell cycle control. INK4a, a critical element of the retinoblastoma gene pathway, binds to and inhibits the activities of CDK4 and CDK6, while ARF, a critical element of the p53 pathway, increases the level of functional p53 via interaction with MDM2. Here we clone and characterize the promoter of the human ARF gene and show that it is a CpG island characteristic of a housekeeping gene which contains numerous Sp1 sites. Both ARF and INK4a are coordinately expressed in cells except when their promoter regions become de novo methylated. In one of these situations, ARF transcription could be reactivated by treatment with the DNA methylation inhibitor 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine, and the reactivation kinetics of ARF and INK4a were found to differ slightly in a cell line in which both genes were silenced by methylation. The ARF promoter was also found to be highly responsive to E2F1 expression, in keeping with previous results at the RNA level. Lastly, transcription from the ARF promoter was down-regulated by wild-type p53 expression, and the magnitude of the effect correlated with the status of the endogenous p53 gene. This finding points to the existence of an autoregulatory feedback loop between p53, MDM2, and ARF, aimed at keeping p53 levels in check.

Base Sequence↗

Risk factors for development of acute renal failure (ARF) requiring dialysis in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Acute renal failure (ARF) is one of the major complications after cardiopulmonary bypass for open heart operations. The present study was undertaken to identify the risk factors for the development of ARF following cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Four hundred and forty-seven consecutive patients who underwent open heart procedures from July 1994 to June 1995 were analyzed retrospectively. Their mean age was 55.6 +/- 14.2 (SD) years (range, 18 to 80). Dialysis was instituted whenever a patient exhibited inadequate urine output (<0.5 mL/kg/hr) for 2 to 3 hours despite correction of hemodynamic status and diuretic therapy, especially if fluid overload, hyperkalemia, or metabolic acidosis were also present. Twenty variables were analyzed by univariate analysis; these included nine preoperative variables--age, sex, hypertension, atherosclerosis, diabetes mellitus, left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) >5 cm, preoperative congestive heart failure, renal insufficiency (serum creatinine > or =130 micromol/L on two occasions), and sepsis--10 intraoperative variables--duration of CPB, redo procedures, emergency surgery, use of intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) in operating room, use of gentamicin, use of ceftriaxone, use of sulbactam/ampicillin, requirement of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest, duration of low mean perfusion pressure (mean pressure <50 mmHg for more than 30 minutes), operation on multiple valves--and one postoperative variable--significant hypotension (systolic blood pressure less than 90 mmHg for more than 1 hour). Significant variables or the variables having a trend (p<0.1) to be associated with ARF were included in stepwise multiple logistic regression analyses. Three regression analyses were performed separately. The incidence of ARF requiring dialysis in the study period was 15.0%. Significant risk factors for whole group of patients (regression I) were preoperative renal insufficiency (p<0.0001), postoperative hypotension (p<0.0001), cardiopulmonary bypass time more than 140 min (p<0.005), preoperative congestive heart failure (p<0.01), and history of diabetes mellitus (p<0.01). The risk factors in the valve group of patients (regression II) were preoperative renal insufficiency (p<0.0001) and postoperative hypotension (p<0.05). Risk factors in the CABG patients (regression III) were postoperative hypotension (p=0.0001), CPB time more than 140 min (p<0.05), preoperative renal insufficiency (p<0.05), and age (p<0.05). The authors conclude that preoperative renal insufficiency and postoperative hypotension are the most important independent risk factors for ARF in postcardiac surgical patients. In addition, CPB time greater than 140 minutes and old age are also independent risk factors for ARF in CABG patients. CPB time more than 140 minutes, history of diabetes mellitus, and preoperative congestive heart failure are independent risk factors for development of ARF in our total group of patients. These findings may have important clinical implications in the prevention of ARF in postcardiac surgical patients.

Acute Kidney Injury↗

Arf GAPs and membrane traffic.

The selective transfer of material between membrane-delimited organelles is mediated by protein-coated vesicles. In many instances, formation of membrane trafficking intermediates is regulated by the GTP-binding protein Arf. Binding and hydrolysis of GTP by Arf was originally linked to the assembly and disassembly of vesicle coats. Arf GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs), a family of proteins that induce hydrolysis of GTP bound to Arf, were therefore proposed to regulate the disassembly and dissociation of vesicle coats. Following the molecular identification of Arf GAPs, the roles for GAPs and GTP hydrolysis have been directly examined. GAPs have been found to bind cargo and known coat proteins as well as directly contribute to vesicle formation, which is consistent with the idea that GAPs function as subunits of coat proteins rather than simply Arf inactivators. In addition, GTP hydrolysis induced by GAPs occurs largely before vesicle formation and is required for sorting. These results are the primary basis for modifications to the classical model for the function of Arf in transport vesicle formation, including a recent proposal that Arf has a proofreading, rather than a structural, role.

ADP-Ribosylation Factors↗

B23 and ARF: friends or foes?

B23 (nucleophosmin/NPM) is a multifunctional protein that recently has been directly implicated in the p53 network by its documented interaction with the p14(ARF)/p19(Arf) tumor suppressor, a major upstream activator of p53. Here we provide an overview of the functional interactions of B23 and ARF. We also integrate the current models into a unified picture, showing that B23 is essential for stabilizing and maintaining a basal level of ARF in the nucleolus, whereas increasing levels of ARF after oncogenic stress promotes B23 degradation and interferes with B23 nucleocytoplasmic shuttling. In this way, ARF can be regarded as a parasitic peptide on the B23 molecule, because ARF uses this chaperone for its own survival but also antagonizes normal activities of B23. Finally, the functional significance of the ARF-B23 interaction for tumor development and the prospects for novel cancer therapies are evaluated.

Animals↗

The ARF-p53 senescence pathway in mouse and human cells.

Mouse and human cells have most frequently been used for studies that have led to the elucidation of various molecular pathways involved in senescence. The ARF-p53 pathway has been assigned as one of the major protagonists in these phenomena. ARF is an alternative reading frame protein encoded along with p16INK4A by the INK4a locus on human chromosome 9p21 and the corresponding locus on mouse chromosome 4. Whereas the mouse ARF (p19ARF) consists of 169 amino acids, the human ARF (p14ARF) consists of 132 amino acids, truncated at the C-terminus. Molecular studies on the regulation of ARF activity by its binding partners have revealed that mouse ARF protein, but not human ARF protein, interacts with a cytoplasmic protein, Pex19p. This interaction of mouse ARF with Pex19p results in its milder p53 activation function in mouse cells as compared to human cells and thus accounts, at least in part, for the weaker tumor surveillance and frequent immortalization of mouse cells.

Animals↗

The rat ARF protein is translated from two closely spaced ATG start codons and can transcriptionally activate p53 in the absence of p53 protein stabilization.

We have analyzed the transcriptional start sites of the rat ARF gene and the amino acid sequence of the rat ARF tumor suppressor protein. The 5' end of the ratARF gene is similar to that of a number of cellular housekeeping genes in that it is CG-rich and does not contain an upstream TATA box motif to define a precise transcriptional start site. The transcription of the rat ARF gene is initiated at multiple start sites with one major start site accounting for 41% of transcription. The rat ARF protein contains two methionine ATG codons at its amino terminus separated by 10 amino acids. The translation of the major endogenous ARF protein species is initiated from the upstream methionine ATG codon. The upstream methionine ATG codon is predominantly used, despite the fact that it is both very close to the major transcriptional start site (6 bases downstream) and is in a less favorable nucleic acid sequence context than the downstream ATG, relative to the ideal sequence postulated for efficient initiation of translation. The downstream, inefficient rat ARF ATG is equivalent to the major mouse ARF ATG start codon. Both of these closely spaced ATGs can be utilized as a translational start codon to produce a nucleolar-localized ARF protein which can induce a p53-dependent inhibition of cell division and transcriptional activation of p53 in the absence of p53 stabilization.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Alterations and hypermethylation of the p14(ARF) gene in gastric cancer.

p14(ARF), generated through an alternative splicing process that replaces the first exon, 1alpha, of p16(INK4a) with exon 1beta, located >15 kb upstream of exon 1alpha, has been shown to function as a growth suppressor. We examined 11 gastric cancer cell lines for mRNA expression, homozygous deletion, mutation, and promoter methylation of the p14(ARF) gene. No mRNA expression was detected in 5 of the 7 diffuse-type cell lines. All intestinal cell lines displayed normal levels of expression except for one with a low level of expression. Of the 5 cell lines without expression, 3 (MKN45, NUGC-2, and NUGC-4) and 1 (KATO III) displayed homozygous deletion and methylation of the p14(ARF) gene, respectively. No mutation was found in the whole coding region of the p14(ARF) gene in 8 cell lines without homozygous deletion. Our results indicate that the p14(ARF) gene is more frequently inactivated by homozygous deletion or methylation in diffuse-type gastric cancer cell lines (5/7, 71.4%) than in intestinal ones (0/4, P = 0.022). When we also analyzed 62 primary gastric cancers for the methylation status of the p14(ARF) promoter region, the methylation frequency tended to be higher in diffuse-type gastric cancers (15/33, 45.5%) than in intestinal ones (7/28, 25%). Thus, p14(ARF) alterations might be involved in diffuse-type gastric carcinogenesis.

Carrier Proteins↗

The ARF tumor suppressor inhibits BCL6-mediated transcriptional repression.

The ARF tumor suppressor gene antagonizes generation of various tumors. ARF-mediated tumor suppression occurs in a p53-independent manner as well as in a p53-dependent manner. We here demonstrate that BCL6 is a target of the ARF tumor suppressor. Either mouse p19(ARF) or human p14(ARF) binds to BCL6 and downregulates BCL6-induced transcriptional repression. ARF-mediated downregulation of the BCL6 activity may account in part for ARF-mediated tumor suppression.

Animals↗

The ARF tumour suppressor.

The ARF tumour suppressor is a product of the INK4a/ARF locus; a sequence that is frequently altered in human cancer. ARF is upregulated by oncogenic stimuli and is a critical regulator of p53 stability through interactions with the mdm2 and ARF-BP1/Mule ubiquitin ligases. Cellular stress signals liberate ARF from the nucleolus where it is bound to B23/nucleophosmin. This nucleolar location of ARF may serve as a reservoir for the rapid induction of p53, but may also serve to co-ordinate effects on cell cycle, survival and growth. The biological functions of ARF interactions with other binding partners remain uncertain, but ARF-mediated sumoylation may represent a unifying effector pathway.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Correlation between p14(ARF)/p16(INK4A) expression and HPV infection in uterine cervical cancer.

The CDKN2A locus on human chromosome 9p21 encodes two tumor suppressors, p14(ARF) and p16(INK4A), which enhance the growth-suppressive functions of the retinoblastoma (Rb) and the p53 proteins, respectively. Conversely, the E6 and E7 oncoproteins of the high-risk human papillomaviruses (HPVs) causally associated with carcinogenesis of the uterine cervix contributes to tumor development by inactivating p53 and Rb. Nevertheless, a correlation between expression of p14(ARF)/p16(INK4A) and HPV infection in uterine cervix is less clear. To clarify this, we examined 25 cervical cancers and 11 normal uterine cervixes. HPV was detected in 21 of 25 cervical cancers (84%) and their subtype was determined by PCR-RFLP. Quantitative real-time RT-PCR assays showed overexpression of p14(ARF) mRNA in all 21 HPV-positive cases (100%). p16(INK4A) mRNA was overexpressed in 17 cases of the HPV-positive cases (81%). In four HPV-negative cancers, reduced expression of p14(ARF) mRNA was detected in two cases (50%) and reduced p16(INK4A) mRNA in three cases (75%). Our data indicate that the overexpression of p14(ARF) and p16(INK4A) strongly associates with HPV-positive cervical cancers and that reduced expression of p14(ARF) and p16(INK4A) correlates with HPV-negative cervical cancers. These findings may indicate that impaired p14(ARF) and p16(INK4A) mRNA expression contribute to tumor development in HPV-negative cervical cancers by failure to support p53 and Rb instead of their inactivation by HPV E6 and E7.

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell↗

A BAR domain in the N terminus of the Arf GAP ASAP1 affects membrane structure and trafficking of epidermal growth factor receptor.

BACKGROUND: Arf GAPs are multidomain proteins that function in membrane traffic by inactivating the GTP binding protein Arf1. Numerous Arf GAPs contain a BAR domain, a protein structural element that contributes to membrane traffic by either inducing or sensing membrane curvature. We have examined the role of a putative BAR domain in the function of the Arf GAP ASAP1. RESULTS: ASAP1's N terminus, containing the putative BAR domain together with a PH domain, dimerized to form an extended structure that bound to large unilamellar vesicles containing acidic phospholipids, properties that define a BAR domain. A recombinant protein containing the BAR domain of ASAP1, together with the PH and Arf GAP domains, efficiently bent the surface of large unilamellar vesicles, resulting in the formation of tubular structures. This activity was regulated by Arf1*GTP binding to the Arf GAP domain. In vivo, the tubular structures induced by ASAP1 mutants contained epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and Rab11, and ASAP1 colocalized in tubular structures with EGFR during recycling of receptor. Expression of ASAP1 accelerated EGFR trafficking and slowed cell spreading. An ASAP1 mutant lacking the BAR domain had no effect. CONCLUSIONS: The N-terminal BAR domain of ASAP1 mediates membrane bending and is necessary for ASAP1 function. The Arf dependence of the bending activity is consistent with ASAP1 functioning as an Arf effector.

ADP-Ribosylation Factors↗

Alterations of the tumor suppressor genes CDKN2A (p16(INK4a)), p14(ARF), CDKN2B (p15(INK4b)), and CDKN2C (p18(INK4c)) in atypical and anaplastic meningiomas.

We investigated 67 meningothelial tumors (20 benign meningiomas, 34 atypical meningiomas, and 13 anaplastic meningiomas) for losses of genetic information from chromosome arms 1p and 9p, as well as for deletion, mutation, and expression of the tumor suppressor genes CDKN2A (p16(INKa)/MTS1), p14(ARF), CDKN2B (p15(INK4b)/MTS2) (all located at 9p21) and CDKN2C (1p32). Comparative genomic hybridization and microsatellite analysis showed losses on 1p in 11 anaplastic meningiomas (85%), 23 atypical meningiomas (68%), and 5 benign meningiomas (25%). One atypical meningioma with loss of heterozygosity on 1p carried a somatic CDKN2C mutation (c.202C>T: R68X). Losses on 9p were found in five anaplastic meningiomas (38%), six atypical meningiomas (18%), and one benign meningioma (5%). Six anaplastic meningiomas (46%) and one atypical meningioma (3%) showed homozygous deletions of the CDKN2A, p14(ARF), and CDKN2B genes. Two anaplastic meningiomas carried somatic point mutations in CDKN2A (c.262G>T: E88X and c.262G>A: E88K) and p14(ARF) (c.305G>T: G102V and c.305G>A: G102E). One anaplastic meningioma, three atypical meningiomas, and one benign meningioma without a demonstrated homozygous deletion or mutation of CDKN2A, p14(ARF), or CDKN2B lacked detectable transcripts from at least one of these genes. Hypermethylation of CDKN2A, p14(ARF), and CDKN2B could be demonstrated in one of these cases. Taken together, our results indicate that CDKN2C is rarely altered in meningiomas. However, the majority of anaplastic meningiomas either show homozygous deletions of CDKN2A, p14(ARF), and CDKN2B, mutations in CDKN2A and p14(ARF), or lack of expression of one or more of these genes. Thus, inactivation of the G(1)/S-phase cell-cycle checkpoint is an important aberration in anaplastic meningiomas.

Adult↗