Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “HANDEDNESS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,603 records · Page 89Linked to original sources
PubMed1975

Functional asymmetry in the face.

The possible existence of one-sided dominance in the face, similar to the phenomena of handedness and footedness, has been investigated by studying smiling pattern, movements of the angles of mouth, winking, platysma contraction, raising and everting the upper lip with dilatation of the nostril, and vertical wrinkling of the forehead, on 300 right-handed and 30 left-handed persons. The conclusions are as follows: 1. The large majority of persons investigated do not use the two sides of face equally. 2. Facial ambilaterality is a rare feature. 3. There is no clear-cut correlation between handedness and the dominant side of the face. 4. The greater percentage (58.66%) of right-handed persons show a left-sided smile and find it more convenient to perform almost all exercises with the left side of the face. A still greater percentage (73.33%) of left-handed persons shows a right-sided smile and a better performance of all exercises with the right side of the face. The contralateral relationship of handedness to the dominant side of the face is significant in the right-handed and more so, in the left-handed persons.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1981

Motoric lateralization in schizophrenic males.

Over an 8-month period 84 male patients with schizophrenia were tested for handedness. The authors' data suggest that there is an increased frequency of left-handedness, as well as mixed-handedness, among schizophrenic patients.

Functional Laterality↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Beyond phonology: What else is needed to describe the problems of below-average readers and spellers?

The difficulties experienced by below-average readers in phonological decoding tasks are well documented. Recent research has suggested that additional deficits in perceptual-motor fluency, handedness, and memory may also exist among below-average readers. To evaluate these claims, average and below-average readers and spellers were compared on a range of phonological processing, verbal short-term and working memory, rapid naming, handedness, and perceptual-motor fluency tasks. Average and below-average readers were sampled in a comparable manner and were also comparable on age, gender, nonverbal ability, socioeconomic status, and ethnicity. Below-average readers and spellers performed lower than average readers and spellers on rhyme detection, pseudoword decoding, and rapid digit (but not picture) naming tasks, but showed no differences in handedness tasks or on a range of other perceptual-motor tasks.

Child↗
PubMed2003

Callosum and movement control: case reports.

This article explores the role of directionality of callosal traffic (codified as handedness), based on personal clinical observations and a critical review of the literature. Based on this evidence, a technical definition of handedness is offered as opposed to the behavioral method in use until now. In the vast majority of right-handers neural and behavioral handedness match. The situation is the opposite in left-handers where two thirds of them are wired to be right-handers, causing the well-known heterogeneity seen in left-handed cohorts. The callosum-length proximity of the dominant side of the body to the command center in the major hemisphere is the source of its neurophysiological superiority compared to the nondominant side. Clinical syndromes in which the new scheme are manifested are reviewed, indicating the existence of an excitatory influence by the neuronal aggregate devoted to voluntary actions, housed in the major hemisphere, on their counterparts in the minor hemisphere. The latter is exclusively devoted to volitional movements occurring on the nondominant side. Thus, it is the directionality of callosal traffic that is responsible for cerebral asymmetries seen in the motor realm.

Adult↗
PubMed1980

Cerebral dominance and cerebral asymmetries on computed tomogram in childhood.

Hand preference assessment and computed tomography (CT) were used in 94 children to determine whether cerebral morphologic asymmetries were closely correlated with handedness, as reported for adults. We found that parent-reported hand preference and tested hand preference were highly correlated. Eighty-two percent of the CTs showed asymmetry between the hemispheres, but there was no significant correlation between hemispheric configuration and any measure of handedness. Although there may be a statistical relationship between cerebral configuration and handedness in large groups of subjects, hemispheric asymmetries found on routine CT of the head cannot serve as predictors of cerebral dominance in children.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Right-handers and Americans favor turning to the right.

We tested a finding by E. S. Robinson (1933) that people have a bias to turn right upon entering a building. We hypothesized that this bias is attributable to learning derived from traffic rules that specify driving on the right side of the road and that it also could be related to handedness. We tested participants in both the United States and England in a simple "T-maze" task in order to compare their directional preference. Handedness was the best predictor of participants' directional preference. However, U.S. participants also were statistically more likely to turn right than were English participants. The preference to turn right was not found to be significantly related to eye dominance or reading direction of the primary written language of the participant, although in the case of reading direction, the sample size of right-to-left readers was too small to be conclusive. The findings support that walking direction preference is an additive function of both learned driving patterns and genetic handedness. These findings have practical implications for the design of public spaces such as schools, businesses, and urban centers.

Automobile Driving↗
PubMed2006

Periodontal assessment by right- and left-handed examiners: is there a difference?

BACKGROUND: Multiple factors that influence the precision of periodontal probing measurements have been identified. These factors can be categorized as being dependent upon host-related, probe-related, or examiner-related variables. However, the potential influence of examiner handedness (right or left) on the measurement of periodontal probing depths (PDs) has not been addressed. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the measurements of PDs in the right and left quadrants are influenced by the handedness of the examiner. METHODS: Eight systemically healthy adult subjects with varying degrees of attachment loss and a minimum of 20 teeth were examined by five right-handed and five left-handed clinicians. The 10 clinicians were trained and calibrated for reproducible probe placement and angulation. PDs were measured using a conventional periodontal probe at six sites per tooth. Mean PD measurements were compared between right- and left-handed examiners using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a random patient effect to correlate participant data and a random effect for the examiner. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in the measurement of PDs between right- and left-handed examiners at various locations in the mouth (P>0.17 in all cases). Only three individual sites showed a statistically significantly different mean PD between right- and left-handed examiners (unadjusted P<0.05; differences at or near 0.5 mm). Overall, right-handed examiners tended to record slightly higher PD measurements than left-handed examiners, but this difference did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: The handedness of the periodontal examiner does not appear to influence the recorded measurement of probing depths. This finding is relevant to those conducting clinical research involving assessment of periodontal status.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Lateralization of squamous cell carcinomas in the head-neck region.

Earlier studies have shown the lateralization of several immune disorders, including herpes zoster infection and breast cancer. We investigated whether there is lateralization of squamous cell carcinomas in the head-neck region and a relation of handedness with this cancer. Analysis showed right-sided lateralization of head-heck cancers in right-handed patients and vice versa in left-handed ones and a higher rate of left-handedness in patients with squamous cell cancer. Associations among left-handedness, squamous cell carcinoma, and its lateralization may result from a genetic togetherness.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Sex and eyedness in a sample of Turkish high school students.

The relationship of sex with eyedness was examined in 176 boys and 129 girls ages 15 to 21 years (M = 16.9 yr., SD = 1.8) in Turkish high schools. Sex was significantly associated with handedness; the rate of left-handedness was 10.8% in boys and 2.3% in girls and was not related to eyedness. Rate of left-eyedness in the sample was 7.9% for boys and 8.5% for girls. One may wonder whether eyedness shows a reverse sex effect, less than handedness, but methods of measurement must be compared.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1984

The Target Test: a brief laterality measure of speed and accuracy.

This paper describes a performance measure of lateral dominance, the Target Tests, which provides separate assessments of manual speed and accuracy within a relatively simple paper-and-pencil format. The Target Tests were administered to 111 normal adults, and scores were examined with respect to handedness, familial left-handedness, and sex. The tests significantly differentiated between right- and left-handers. Target scores were substantially correlated with the Harris Tests of Lateral Dominance, suggesting adequate reliability and validity. The means, standard deviations, and ranges for the preferred and nonpreferred hands for both handedness groups were nearly identical. The Target Tests provide a convenient instrument for assessing motoric lateralization of speed and accuracy in clinical and research settings.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Does motor cerebral dominance develop secondary to sensory dominance?

Current research and theoretical frameworks for understanding motor dominance assume that motor dominance is primary. Various developmental clues, however, suggest that the maturation of proprioceptive sensory processing predates that of motor control. We hypothesized that the observed adult pattern of lateralized motor dominance may develop as a consequence of preexisting lateralized "sensory" or "proprioceptive dominance." To test whether motor preference could develop in response to sensory dominance, we investigated sighting eye dominance, eye lid winking, and handedness in 164 individuals. Subjects winked the nondominant eye significantly more frequently than the dominant eye and independently of their handedness, lending partial support to the idea that motor function can develop in response to sensory function. Specific investigation of the development of the proprioceptive system would be needed to evaluate whether lateralization of motor handedness develops as a consequence of "proprioceptive" lateralization.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Type II errors in comparisons of dextral and sinistral groups.

Anomalous cerebral dominance can have multiple manifestations, e.g., left-eye preference or left-foot preference in the absence of left handedness per se. The 1987 estimate of prevalence of anomalous dominance in the population by Geschwind and Behan approaches 30%, three times the estimate obtained by using handedness alone as the sorting criterion. Accordingly, substantial numbers of subjects assigned to "dextral" groups may actually display other legitimate indicators of anomalous dominance. As such there is a tendency to commit Type II errors in studies in which handedness alone is used to represent the variance attributed to cerebral dominance. Accordingly, null hypotheses assessing the relations of cerebral dominance with dependent variables are accepted even though they may, in fact, be false.

Dominance, Cerebral↗
PubMed1998

Some aspects of self-reported hand preference.

The aim of the present study was to compare self-reported handedness with the directly tested hand preference using a 10-item battery in sample of 1223 students. The question assessing self-reported handedness was whether you are a left- or a right-hander or you use both hands equally. Responses indicate that self-reported handedness is a crude but possible method of measurement. Female right-handers showed the best agreement.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Consistency of hand use and accidents with injury.

In this study, we examined the relationship between the consistency of hand use and the self-reported incidence of accidents with injuries which required medical care in groups of university students (n = 23 for each group). To do this, we adopted a scoring procedure for the Briggs-Nebes Handedness Scale that permitted us to classify individuals as consistent or inconsistent in the use of their hands. We observed that the inconsistent group was 6.12 times more likely to have experienced accidents with injury that required medical care than the consistent group. These data have implications for the literature on handedness classification and accidents. Collectively, these limited data underscore the need to pay attention to the consistency of hand use in research on handedness, health, and longevity.

Accidents↗
PubMed2000

Do left-handed competitors have an innate superiority in sports?

This study assessed handedness distributions among (a) sporting competitors (n = 1,112) and nonsporting university students (n = 1,112), (b) sporting competitors engaging in interactive (n = 576) and in noninteractive sports (n = 536), and (c) sporting competitors engaging in direct interactive (n = 219) and indirect interactive (n = 357) sports. Chi-squared showed that there were statistically significant differences in proportions of left-handed persons in (a) sporting competitors and nonsporting university students, (b) sporting competitors engaging in interactive and noninteractive sports, (c) sporting competitors engaging in interactive sports and nonsporting university students, and (d) sporting competitors engaging in direct interactive and indirect interactive sports. It appears that left-handers are more common among those who engage in competitive manual activities. This superiority of the left-handers may be fully explained by a consideration of tactical or strategic factors associated with handedness during sporting interactions. The results with important implications for the measurement and evaluation of handedness are discussed in the light of the current findings on laterality.

Achievement↗
PubMed2000

Sidedness preference as an index of organization of laterality.

A rightward bias to all forms of sidedness seems to be particularly human and perhaps characteristic of every human society. However, this phenomenon has been studied mainly in relation to lateralization of handedness and language. This study investigated the consistency of right- and nonright-handed individuals in prefer ring the same side for foot, eye, and ear using Coren's Lateral Preference Inventory. The sample of 194 students, 91 boys and 103 girls, ranging in age from 11.5-14.5 years (M age 13.2 yr.) was recruited from public junior high schools in a rural area in Greece on the island of Rhodes. Despite the dominance of the right side observed in handedness, footedness, eyedness, and earedness, this tendency was not equally strong in all four indexes of lateral preference, with handedness showing comparatively the strongest tendency and earedness showing comparatively the weakest tendency. Moreover, the strength of preference for the same side for foot, eye, and ear was significantly weaker in nonright-handed individuals compared to right handed individuals. These results agree with the hypothesis that nonright-handers may have reduced rath er than reversed asymmetry.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Comparison of two alternative measures of the boundary construct.

'Mental boundaries' is a traditional concept in psychology, although attempts to conceptualize and measure such boundaries empirically have only recently been pursued. Two major efforts in this respect are Hartmann's Boundary Questionnaire and the Revised Transliminality Scale of Lange, Thalbourne, Houran, and Storm. We administered both along with the Briggs-Nebes Handedness Scale to a convenience sample of 268 participants to assess the convergent validity of the two boundary measures and to replicate previous evidence that the boundary construct involves body boundaries as well, such as a tendency toward mixed-handedness. As predicted, scores on the Revised Transliminality Scale correlated .66 positively with total scores on the Boundary Questionnaire, but neither measure was associated with the handedness scale. Each of the 12 domains of the Boundary Questionnaire correlated significantly with total scores on the Transliminality Scale, yet only five domains contributed significantly to the prediction of variance in transliminality scores in a standard multiple regression analysis. Analysis suggests that transliminality is related to specific domains of the Boundary Questionnaire, and we hypothesize that the other domains of the Boundary Questionnaire represent higher levels of the boundary construct than what is measured by the Revised Transliminality Scale. This idea is discussed within the context of Werner's 1948 theory of syncretic versus symbolic cognition.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1989

Right-left asymmetry of maximum jaw opening.

According to several studies on human populations, the mandible deviates on opening significantly more often to the left than to the right. An association between the asymmetry of opening and handedness has been suggested. The present study of 143 left-handed Finnish conscripts showed no significant difference from the asymmetry reported for populations unselected for handedness. It was concluded that the opening asymmetry and handedness are not associated. The asymmetry proved also to be unassociated with the side of first unilateral tooth contact on guided hinge closure, with the side of palpatory tenderness of the muscles of mastication, and with the side of temporomandibular joint sounds.

Dental Occlusion↗