Antimicrobial formulary control: is the glass half empty or half full?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Formulary management implications are described for an Oklahoma integrated health system that consists of 14 acute care facilities, numerous owned medical practices, and a fledgling HMO and has loose alliances with other rural facilities. A systemwide pharmacy director has yet to be appointed; however, the position of pharmacy operations manager for the Oklahoma City area has been created. A physician group has been formed that is expected to address systemwide pharmacy and therapeutics (P&T) committees and formulary strategies. Currently, P&T committee activities take place at the individual hospital level. The hospitals do not have restrictive formularies. An overall formulary system would likely be patterned after the largest hospital's system, which includes a formal approval process in which a P&T subcommittee reviews drug use outside established guidelines and the P&T committee asks the appropriate medical department to address the problem. For ambulatory care, the HMO has contracted with a pharmacy benefit manager (PBM), and there is no coordination of formulary efforts between the PBM and health system entities. Although this and other problems remain to be resolved, some standardization of drug use has begun. Also, all entities in the system use the same purchasing group and plan to use the same information systems. Drug use among hospitalized patients in this integrated health system is influenced by the usage guidelines established at the largest hospital, and drug use among ambulatory managed care patients is influenced by an external PBM.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The use of decision analysis as a tool in making formulary decisions is discussed. Decision analysis is best applied in formulary decisions when factors other than acquisition costs are important in determining overall treatment costs for two products. The decision-analysis process assigns probabilities and costs to various treatments and outcomes. In the case of acute myocardial infarction, the decision analyst would gather data on angioplasty and thrombolysis and assign probabilities and costs for each treatment and subsequent endpoints on the basis of clinical trial data. When such data do not exist, estimates may be generated by expert panels. Applying clinical trial data to an individual hospital is not straightforward because of differences between clinical trials and clinical practice. Analysts and clinicians should evaluate any proposed model for its robustness and adaptability to local conditions and practitioner variation. Access to internal hospital data is essential in developing the model. An ideal decision-analysis model includes all important available interventions and defines and discloses the analyst's time frame and financial perspective. After implementation of the formulary decision, the results can be monitored and, if necessary, adjustments can be made in the allocation of resources. Barriers to effective decision analysis include lack of data and differences in sources of cost and outcome data. Despite the current limitations of decision analysis, clinicians and policymakers may find this technique increasingly useful in the complex formulary process.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The results of a survey on the activities and functions of hospital-based pharmacy and therapeutics (P&T) committees are presented. Questionnaires were mailed to the pharmacy director or the person responsible for the pharmacy's drug information service at 267 teaching hospitals throughout the United States in 1994 and 1995. The survey questions covered P&T committee composition, functions, roles of members, policies and procedures, and formulary-maintenance activities. The overall response rate was 70%. The mean number of members on the P&T committees was 19.3, of whom 91% were allowed to vote. There was an average of 12.3 physicians on the committees. Each P&T committee had at least one pharmacist member, with an average of 3.2 pharmacist members; 69.5% of the institutions reported having a committee secretary, who was almost always a pharmacist. On almost all committees, pharmacists wrote the minutes, prepared the formulary review documents, and were responsible for monitoring formulary activities outside the meeting. The P&T committee functioned in a very formal manner. Most (87.7%) of the respondents reported that their institutions had a closed formulary. At all hospitals, the attending medical staff could request additions to the formulary, but at only 62.4% of the hospitals could pharmacy staff make a similar request. The committees were active in changing the formulary. P&T committees in large teaching hospitals are active in formulary management, are large and diverse, and consist mainly of physicians, although pharmacists play an important role in the meetings.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Use of a clinical pathway for the management of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) at a large community hospital is described. The pathway was developed and implemented by a multidisciplinary team. Fluoroquinolone therapeutic interchange and intravenous (i.v.) to oral (p.o.) conversion were part of the pathway; through literature review, levofloxacin was chosen as the preferred quinolone. Outcomes (length of stay [LOS] and readmission rates for pathway and nonpathway patients with CAP, economic impact of the fluoroquinolone interchange protocol, and resistance patterns) were evaluated. For pathway patients in 1998, LOS was 1.2 days shorter and the readmission rate was lower. Projected drug cost savings as a result of the fluoroquinolone interchange protocol were more than $22,000 annually. Pharmacists' interventions in antimicrobial prescribing for CAP patients can lead to cost efficiency and positively affect patient outcomes.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Pharmacy costs associated with handling nonformulary drug requests were studied. Data for all nonformulary drug orders received at a university hospital between August 1 and October 31, 1999, were evaluated to determine their outcome and the cost differential between the nonformulary drug and formulary alternative. Two sets of data were used to analyze medication costs: data from nonformulary medication request forms, which allowed the cost of nonformulary drugs and their formulary alternatives to be calculated, and data from the pharmacy computer system, which enabled actual nonformulary drug use to be captured. Labor costs associated with processing these requests were determined through time analysis, which included the potential for orders to be received at different times of the day and with different levels of technician and pharmacist support. Economic analysis revealed that the greatest cost saving occurred when converting nonformulary injectable products to formulary alternatives. Interventions were least costly during normal business hours, when all the satellite pharmacies were open and fully staffed. Pharmacists' interventions in oral product orders resulted in a net increase in expenditures. Incremental pharmacy costs associated with processing nonformulary medication requests in an inpatient setting are greater than the drug acquisition cost saving for most agents, particularly oral medications.