Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Aortic Dissection”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,603 records · Page 89Linked to original sources

[Causes of pitfalls in CT diagnosis of aortic dissection].

The author lists the most frequent causes of incorrect diagnosis of aortic dissection by CT scanning. False-positive and false-negative diagnoses are rare owing to the availability of sophisticated scanners and growing experience of physicians.

Aortic Dissection↗

Ambulatory follow-up of aortic dissection: comparison between computed tomography and biplane transesophageal echocardiography.

UNLABELLED: Aim of the study was to assess the relative usefulness of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and X-ray computed tomography (CT) in the follow-up of patients who survived an aortic dissection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 44 patients (age = 57 +/- 12 years) with treated aortic dissection: 14 had a De Bakey type I, 20 a type II and 1 patient a type III dissection treated surgically: 1 patient had a type I, 1 a type II and 7 a type III dissection treated medically. All entered an outpatient follow-up program with serial evaluations at 1, 6 and 12 months after initial diagnosis by dual noninvasive imaging protocol. A contrast-enhanced CT scan and a TEE with biplane probe were performed on the same day and in random order. RESULTS: A total of 252 evaluations with both CT and TEE were considered. A completely normal study was found in 45 TEE and 48 CT evaluations. The following abnormal findings could be documented by one or both techniques: thrombus in the false lumen (TEE: n = 48; CT: n = 45 evaluations); intimal flap (TEE and CT: n = 68); aortic dilatation (TEE and CT: n = 15); pericardial effusion (TEE and CT: n = 3); aortic pseudoaneurysm (TEE: n = 2; CT: n = 3); isthmic coarctation (TEE and CT: n = 1). Regarding the presence or absence of these abnormalities, which are within the diagnostic domain of both imaging techniques, the results were fully concordant in 245 studies, and discordant in 7, with an overall agreement of 97%. In addition, some abnormal findings could be detected by TEE only: aortic insufficiency (n = 36); intimal tear (n = 25); spontaneous echocontrast effect in the false lumen (n = 39 evaluations). Other abnormal findings could be detected by CT only: a pleural effusion in 4, a truncus anonymous dissection in 1, a pseudoaneurysm due to suture dehiscence of the distal anastomosis of the ascending aorta in 1 evaluation (which yielded ambiguous results by TEE, with turbulent flow departing from the graft). CONCLUSION: Both CT and TEE are atraumatic, safe and accurate techniques for serial follow-up imaging of patients treated for aortic dissection. Information provided by CT is largely redundant, rather than additive, to that provided by TEE. The latter should be probably preferred for shorter imaging time, accuracy and convenience, although CT might still play a role in selected cases of ambiguous TEE results.

Adult↗

Operation for acute type A aortic dissection in octogenarians: is it justified?

BACKGROUND: With the progressive aging of Western populations, cardiac surgeons are faced with treating an increasing number of elderly patients. Controversy exists as to whether the expenditure of health care resources on the growing elderly populations represents a cost-effective approach to resource management. The potential to avoid surgery in patients with little chance of survival and poor quality of life would spare unnecessary suffering, reduce operative mortality, and enhance the use of scarce resources. METHODS: We reviewed the records of 24 consecutive patients aged 80 years or older (mean age 83 years, range 80-93 years) who underwent operations for acute type A dissection from 1985 through 1999. No patient with acute type A dissection was refused surgery because of age or concomitant disease. Seventeen patients were men. Preoperatively, none of the patients was moribund, although 66% had hemodynamic instability and 41% experienced cerebral ischemia. All patients had one or more associated pathologic conditions. Hospital mortality and morbidity models, based on our overall experience with 197 patients operated on for acute type A aortic dissection during the period of the study, were developed by means of multivariate logistic regression with preoperative and intraoperative variables used as independent predictors of outcome. RESULTS: Overall hospital mortality was 83%. Intraoperative mortality was 33%. All patients who survived the operation had one or more postoperative complications. Mean hospital stay was 37 days with a total of 314 days in the intensive care unit (average 19 days, median 17 days). None of the survivors (4 patients) discharged from the hospital was able to function independently and their survival at 6 months was 0%. Statistical analysis of the overall experience with operations for type A acute aortic dissection confirmed that age in excess of 80 years is the most important independent patient risk factor associated with 30-day mortality and morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Operations for acute type A dissection performed on octogenarians involve increased hospital mortality and morbidity. Short-term survival is unfavorable and is associated with a poor quality of life. Without additional corroborative studies to endorse the present findings, the use of age as a parameter to limit access of patients to expensive medical resources remains an unsubstantiated concept. In the context of acute type A aortic dissection, however, the hypothesis that older patients should be denied such a complicated surgical intervention to conserve resources is supported by the presented data.

Aged↗

Changing predictors of postoperative mortality in acute type A aortic dissection. Is only coronary artery compromise significant?

OBJECTIVES: Rapid emergency transport and early diagnosis and surgical treatment for acute type A aortic dissection have improved postoperative survival, which has, however, plateaued at about 80%. End-organ malperfusion is regarded as a strong predictor of postoperative mortality, replacing factors such as cardiac tamponade complications, aortic rupture, and left ventricular dysfunction due to aortic insufficiency. It is thus important to reevaluate risk factors for surgical death to assess current therapeutic strategies. METHODS: We statistically analyzed potential risk factors for perioperative death in 88 patients undergoing surgical repair for type A aortic dissection between January 1990 and December 1999. RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed that cardiopulmonary arrest (adjusted odds ratio: 13.78; p < 0.01) and malperfusion of more than 1 vital organ (adjusted odds ratio 4.97, p < 0.01), especially myocardial ischemia due to coronary artery dissection (adjusted odds ratio 3.21, p < 0.05), significantly increased the likelihood of operative death. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed only cardiopulmonary arrest (p < 0.01) and concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting necessitated in cases complicated by evolving myocardial infarction (p < 0.05) to be independent predictors of postoperative mortality. CONCLUSION: Preoperative complication from coronary dissection was the most important predictor of early postoperative mortality in this series. In such cases, rapid surgical intervention before myocardial infarction develops is vital to saving lives.

Acute Disease↗

Computed tomography of aortic dissection.

Fourteen patients suspected of having dissection of the thoracic aorta, two with possible extensions into the abdomen of previously diagnosed dissection of the thoracic aorta, and one patient who had undergone surgical repair of an aortic dissection were examined by CT (computed tomography). Findings included localized increase of the aortic caliber, displaced intimal calcifications, intimal flaps, and false channels. These findings were confirmed by angiography or at necropsy. Two patients in whom CT showed no abnormalities had a favorable outcome. The authors conclude that CT is the examination of choice in removing doubt from the clinical diagnosis of aortic dissection.

Aortic Dissection↗

[D-dimer in acute aortic dissection].

D-dimer measurement is widely accepted as a diagnostic test for pulmonary embolism in cases in which a negative value has a high predictive power. We present two cases of acute thoracic aortic dissection with particularly high D-dimer values and discuss the diagnostic value of D-dimer as an initial test with suspected aortic dissection.

Aged↗

Aortic fenestration for chronic aortic dissection type B complicated by transient ischemic attacks of spinal cord.

Spinal cord injury is a rare complication in patients with aortic dissection. The extrinsic arterial supply to the spinal cord, diminishing caudally, often becomes critically dependent on the great radicular artery (GRA) of Adamkiewicz at the thoracolumbar spine. There are no prior reports of spinal injury or ischemia caused by chronic aortic dissection. We report on a 51-year-old patient with chronic type B dissection of the aorta from below the subclavian takeoff through the iliac arteries, presented with multiple episodes of transient (1 to 5 minutes) spinal ischemic attacks, entailing sudden loss of motor and sensory functions in both legs, with collapse of the patient on the ground. GRA imaging acquired with 64-channel computed tomography angiography enabled aortic fenestration from T11 to L1, performed with supraceliac aortic cross-clamping (T8 to L2) via thoracoabdominal access. We critically appraise the pertinent literature.

Aortic Dissection↗

Aortic dissection in a young corticosteroid-treated patient with systemic lupus erythematosus--a case report.

We report a rare case of acute aortic dissection in a young, corticosteroid-treated hypertensive patient with a long-standing history of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). A brief review of literature on aortic dissection in lupus erythematosus is presented. A low threshold for performing transesophageal echocardiography in the management of chest pain syndrome in SLE is emphasized.

Acute Disease↗

Successful treatment of ascending aortic graft infection after operation for acute aortic dissection with peripheral malperfusion.

Mediastinitis with infection of an ascending aortic graft is hard to heal and is a highly fatal complication. We had a patient in whom mediastinitis with infection of such a graft as well as an ascending aorta-femoral artery bypass graft developed after the initial operation for type A aortic dissection accompanied by peripheral malperfusion. We treated it successfully by inserting a stent into the true lumen of the thoracoabdominal aorta and using a cryopreserved homograft to replace the infected ascending aortic fabric graft.

Acute Disease↗

[Role of echocardiography in the diagnosis of aortic dissection].

Since the introduction of transesophageal transducers, Doppler echocardiography allows to detect aortic dissection with high sensitivity. The extent of the dissection can be determined accurately and the possibility of conducting the examination at bedside is particularly advantageous. Caution is advisable in interpreting doubtful observations in the distal part of the ascending aorta, which often ist incompletely visualized.

Aortic Dissection↗

[Ultrasound, computer tomography and angiography in the diagnosis of dissecting aortic aneurysm].

The findings obtained by ultrasound, CT and angiographic examinations of 75 patients with dissecting aortic aneurysms operated on at the M.M.A. are analysed. The aim of each particular method was to detect the presence of dissection, the aortic entrance tear and type of dissection. These findings were compared with the operative findings. On the basis of the analysis it has been concluded that the precision of the diagnosis obtained by angiography was 93%, by CT 74% and by ultrasound 69%.

Aortic Dissection↗

Optimal treatment of type B acute aortic dissection: long-term medical follow-up results.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to assess the long-term outcome of medical treatment and determine recent surgical indications for type B acute aortic dissection. METHODS: In the last 8 years, 79 patients were admitted to our hospital with type B acute aortic dissection. We medically treated patients at the time of onset, regardless of the aortic diameter and blood patency status in the false lumen. If the maximum diameter of dissected aorta exceeded 60 mm in any stage, early or elective surgery was performed. The mean follow-up duration was 41.2 months. We evaluated operation free rate and actuarial survival rate. RESULTS: Thirteen patients underwent early or elective operations of the descending aorta. At the time of onset, the maximum aortic diameter of these patients was significantly larger than that of medically managed patients (55.8 +/- 4.4 mm vs 44.6 +/- 8.2 mm; p = 0.0004). Two patients underwent emergency axillo-femoral bypass for leg ischemia. Of the other 64 patients, who were medically managed, 2 patients had type A dissection develop during follow-up, 3 died during the initial hospital stay (1 from rupture, 1 from bronchial asthma, and 1 from gut ischemia), and 1 died of pneumonia 6 months after onset. Operation free rate was 98.6% at 1 month, 90.0% at 1 year, 78.7% at 3 years, and 69.5% at 8 years. Actuarial survival rate of medically managed patients was 98.4% at 1 month and 93.5% at 8 years. CONCLUSIONS: Medical treatment of type B acute aortic dissection produced good results. Surgical intervention for type B dissection should be done when the maximum aortic diameter exceeds 60 mm.

Actuarial Analysis↗

[A case of total arch replacement for redissected impending rupture of early thrombosed aortic dissection without intimal tear detectable at operation].

A 51-year-old suddenly developed severe chest and back pains. The diagnosis was acute aortic dissection of Stanford type A, but the dissecting space was not observed by enhanced CT scan. Medical treatment was started as early thrombosed aortic dissection. The blood pressure was sufficiently controlled, and the symptom was gradually improved. On the 8th hospital day, a severe chest pain appeared again, Enhanced CT scan showed an enlarged dissecting space, pericardial and pleural effusion. These findings were considered a redissected impending rupture, so the emergency operation was performed. Fresh clots were observed in the dissecting space of ascending aorta, but the intimal tear was not found in any portion of the examined aorta. Therefore total arch replacement was needed to resect the wall which may be responsible for the dissection and to reduce the residual dissecting space. The patient recovered without complications. Postoperative CT scan revealed no residual false lumen in the distal descending aorta.

Aortic Dissection↗

[Incidence and mortality of aortic dissection].

A population-based study was carried out over a 24-year period between January 1, 1973 and December 31, 1996 to determine the incidence and mortality of the aortic dissection in an administratively defined population of 106,000 inhabitants. The study comprises the consecutive cases of both inpatients and outpatients. Altogether, 74 cases of aortic dissection were found corresponding to 2.89%/year incidence. From the 74 patients 60 were admitted to hospital and 14 outpatients dead before the admission. In the first half of the observational interval (1973-84) 32 cases and in it's second half (1985-96) 42 cases were occurred with incidence of 2.50%/year and 3.28%/year, respectively. The higher incidence of the cases in the second half interval was explained by the significant increase of the autopsy rate of the dead outpatients. The male/female ratio was 1:1.6. The age ranged from 36 years to 97 years with a mean of 66.4 years and the women have had higher mean by the 7.0 years (p < 0.05). The mortality was explosively abrupt at the onset of the disease. Fourteen outpatients (18.9% of the total) died suddenly before admission and in the inpatients after the admission 28.4% died within the first hour, 44.6% within 12 hours, 62.2% within 24 hours and 75.5% within the first two days. Six patients were surgically treated and their perioperative mortality was 2/6, one month survived 4/6 and three years survived 3/6. The other 71 patients died. On the bases of the above-mentioned facts this work may be considered as an representative study. Hereby, the incidence of the aortic dissection in Hungary at least 3.0/100,000/year or rather 300 cases/year should be assessed.

Adult↗

MR measurement of blood flow in the true and false channel in chronic aortic dissection.

Velocity encoded (VEC) cine MR imaging is a new noninvasive technique for the quantification of blood flow velocity in the cardiovascular system. Six patients with type B aortic dissection underwent VEC cine MR imaging at 1.5 T. This technique provides cine MR magnitude and VEC phase images at approximately 16 equally spaced intervals during an average cardiac cycle. A region of interest encompassing a vascular structure, i.e., false channel, provides a spatially averaged velocity for the time interval at which the image was acquired. Interpretation of velocity values from the 16 intervals during the cardiac cycle provides a temporally average velocity. Velocity mapping across the aortic lumen in these six cases showed average spatial and temporal velocity of 13.4 +/- 1.49 cm/s in the true channel and 3.1 +/- 0.84 cm/s in the false channel (p less than 0.05). The peak systolic velocity (temporal peak) was 43.6 +/- 7.20 cm/s in the true channel and 14.3 +/- 2.30 cm/s in the false channel (p less than 0.05). The flow volume per cardiac cycle was not significantly different between the ture (23.1 +/- 5.04 ml/cycle) and false channel (27.1 +/- 10.14 ml/cycle). There was substantial retrograde flow in the false channel of two patients. The intraobserver and interobserver variability was less than 10% (r = 0.98 to 0.99) for the measurement of flow parameters in both the true and the false channel. We conclude that VEC cine MR imaging demonstrates substantial differences in the hemodynamic pattern in the true and false channel in aortic dissection.

Adult↗

[Subtotal aortic replacement in a patient with Marfan's syndrome--replacement of the ascending aorta and entire aortic arch for acute type I aortic dissection 4 years after the thoracoabdominal replacement].

We report a patient with Marfan's syndrome who underwent replacement of the ascending aorta and the entire aortic arch for acute type I aortic dissection 4 years after the thoracoabdominal replacement. As a result, she underwent subtotal aortic replacement from the ascending aorta to the bilateral common iliac arteries in three stages. A 48-years-old female was admitted to our service because of acute heart failure and cardiogenic shock caused by acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection. She had undergone replacement of the descending thoracic aorta at the age of 44 and replacement of the remaining thoracoabdominal aorta with reimplantation of the four major abdominal branches at the age of 46 for a chronic expanding DeBakey type IIIb dissecting aneurysm. She successfully underwent replacement of the ascending aorta and the entire aortic arch with an aortic prosthesis provided with four branch grafts for reconstruction of the arch vessels. Considering the high incidence of new aortic lesion, extensive aortic replacement and careful postoperative follow-up are necessary in patients with Marfan's syndrome.

Aortic Dissection↗