Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Promotion”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,585 records · Page 88Linked to original sources

Action spectrum for induction of promoter activity of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase gene by UV in carrot suspension cells.

The full-length promoter (-2335) of the carrot (Daucus carota) phenylalanine ammonia-lyase gene (gDcPAL1) fused to the luciferase reporter gene was transiently transformed to carrot protoplasts by electroporation, and the promoter activity induced by monochromatic UV light of various wavelengths was examined. The action spectrum constructed from the fluence-response curves showed a single peak at around 280 nm, suggesting that the activation of the gDcPAL1 promoter is categorizable as one of the UVB light responses. The same assay system was applied to variously truncated gDcPAL1 promoters and to CaMV35S promoter fusion with various parts 5'-upstream of the gDcPAL1 promoter. The region from -396 to -190 (relative to the transcription start site) fused to the CaMV35S core (-90) promoter showed a 280 nm-dominant response. However, gDcPAL1 promoters truncated above -570 and -396, although they contain the region between -396 and -190, did not show such a typical UVB response, i.e. they responded to 260 nm light as much as to 280 nm light. The promoter truncated to below -190 also responded to 260 nm light as much as to 280 nm light. Therefore we assumed that the gDcPAL1 promoter is composed of three functionally different parts: the upstream above -570 (modulator), the region from -396 to -190 (UVB responsive) and the down-stream below -190 (UVB and C responsive). The overall UVB response of the gDcPAL1 full-length promoter is explained as the result of interaction of these three components.

Base Sequence↗

Studies of dual promoters of mouse kappa-opioid receptor gene.

Dual promoters were identified in the mouse kappa-opioid receptor (KOR) gene. The distal promoter was located in the 5'-upstream region of exon 1 and the proximal promoter was located in the first intron of this gene. The transcription initiation site of the proximal promoter was mapped to the -93rd nucleotide position from the ATG codon in a primer extension experiment. The expression of KOR mRNAs transcribed from these two promoters in mouse central nervous system and an embryonal carcinoma cell line P19 was confirmed in a ribonuclease protection assay. In non-neuronal tissues, only the transcripts initiated from the distal promoter were detected. The biological activities of these two promoters were determined in transient transfection of P19 cells with a series of reporters, each truncated at various 5'-upstream regions. It was concluded that the distal promoter was located between nucleotide positions -990 and -570, and the proximal promoter was located between nucleotide positions -330 and -93, relative to the translation initiation codon. The presence of dual promoters in the KOR gene suggested potential regulation of KOR expression by using different promoters.

Animals↗

Engineering of promoter replacement cassettes for fine-tuning of gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

The strong overexpression or complete deletion of a gene gives only limited information about its control over a certain phenotype or pathway. Gene function studies based on these methods are therefore incomplete. To effect facile manipulation of gene expression across a full continuum of possible expression levels, we recently created a library of mutant promoters. Here, we provide the detailed characterization of our yeast promoter collection comprising 11 mutants of the strong constitutive Saccharomyces cerevisiae TEF1 promoter. The activities of the mutant promoters range between about 8% and 120% of the activity of the unmutated TEF1 promoter. The differences in reporter gene expression in the 11 mutants were independent of the carbon source used, and real-time PCR confirmed that these differences were due to varying levels of transcription (i.e., caused by varying promoter strengths). In addition to a CEN/ARS plasmid-based promoter collection, we also created promoter replacement cassettes. They enable genomic integration of our mutant promoter collection upstream of any given yeast gene, allowing detailed genotype-phenotype characterizations. To illustrate the utility of the method, the GPD1 promoter of S. cerevisiae was replaced by five TEF1 promoter mutants of different strengths, which allowed analysis of the impact of glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase activity on the glycerol yield.

Base Sequence↗

Insertion or deletion of the Cheo box modifies radiation inducibility of Clostridium promoters.

Radiation-inducible promoters are being used in many viral vector systems to obtain spatial and temporal control of gene expression. It was previously proven that radiation-induced gene expression can also be obtained in a bacterial vector system using anaerobic apathogenic clostridia. The effect of radiation inducibility was detected using mouse tumor necrosis factor alpha (mTNF-alpha) as a model protein under regulation of the radiation-inducible recA promoter. In this report, experiments are described in which this recA promoter was modified in order to increase radiation responsiveness. Incorporation of an extra Cheo box in the recA promoter region resulted in an increase in mTNF-alpha secretion from 44% for the wild-type promoter to 412% for the promoter with an extra Cheo box after a single irradiation dose of 2 Gy. Deletion of the Cheo box in the promoter region eliminated radiation inducibility. These results prove that the Cheo box in the recA promoter is indeed the radiation-responsive element. We also tested whether we could induce the constitutive endo-beta-1,4-glucanase promoter (eglA) via ionizing irradiation by introducing a Cheo box in the promoter region. While the use of the constitutive promoter did not lead to an increase in mTNF-alpha secretion after irradiation, the introduction of a Cheo box resulted in a 242% increase in mTNF-alpha secretion. Reverse transcriptase PCR of RNA samples isolated from irradiated and nonirradiated bacterial cultures demonstrated that the increase in secretion was the result of enhanced transcription of the mTNF-alpha gene.

Animals↗

Core promoter structure in the oomycete Phytophthora infestans.

We have investigated the core promoter structure of the oomycete Phytophthora infestans. The transcriptional start sites (TSS) of three previously characterized P. infestans genes, Piexo1, Piexo3, and Piendo1, were determined by primer extension analyses. The TSS regions were homologous to a previously identified 16-nucleotide (nt) core sequence that overlaps the TSS in most oomycete genes. The core promoter regions of Piexo1 and Piendo1 were investigated by using a transient protoplast expression assay and the reporter gene beta-glucuronidase. Mutational analyses of the promoters of Piexo1 and Piendo1 showed that there is a putative core promoter element encompassing the TSS (-2 to +5) that has high sequence and functional homology to a known core promoter element present in other eukaryotes, the initiator element (Inr). Downstream and flanking the Inr is a highly conserved oomycete promoter region (+7 to +15), hereafter referred to as FPR (flanking promoter region), which is also important for promoter function. The importance of the 19-nt core promoter region (Inr and FPR) in Piexo1 and Piendo1 was further investigated through electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA). The EMSA studies showed that (i) both core promoters were able to specifically bind a protein or protein complex in a P. infestans whole-cell protein extract and (ii) the same mutations that reduced binding of the EMSA complex also reduced beta-glucuronidase (GUS) levels in transient expression assays. The consistency of results obtained using two different assays (GUS transient assays [in vivo] and EMSA studies [in vitro]) supports a convergence of inference about the relative importance of specific nucleotides within the 19-nt core promoter region.

Base Sequence↗

Selective activation of sar promoters with the use of green fluorescent protein transcriptional fusions as the detection system in the rabbit endocarditis model.

The global regulatory locus sar is composed of three overlapping transcripts initiated from a triple-promoter system (designated P1, P3, and P2). To explore if the individual sar promoters are differentially expressed in vitro and in vivo, we constructed a shuttle plasmid (pALC1434) containing a promoterless gfpUV gene (a gfp derivative [Clontech]) preceded by a polylinker region. Recombinant shuttle vectors containing individual sar promoters upstream of the gfpUV reporter gene were then introduced into Staphylococcus aureus RN6390. Northern and immunoblot analysis revealed that P1 is stronger than the P2 and P3 promoters in vitro. Additionally, the levels of the gfpUV transcript driven by individual sar promoters also correlated with the growth cycle dependency of these promoters in liquid cultures, thus suggesting the utility of pALC1434 as a vehicle for reporter fusion. Using the rabbit endocarditis model, we examined the expression of these three GFPUV fusions in vivo by fluorescence microscopy of infected cardiac vegetations 24 h after initial intravenous challenge. Similar to the in vitro findings, P1 was activated both in the center and on the surface of the vegetations. In contrast, the P3 promoter was silent both in vivo and in vitro as determined by fluorescence microscopy. Remarkably, P2 was silent in vitro but became highly activated in vivo. In particular, the sar P2 promoter was activated on the surface of the vegetation but not in the center of the lesion. These data imply that in vivo promoter activation of sar differed from that observed in vitro. Moreover, the individual sar promoters may be differentially expressed in different areas within the same anatomic niche, presumably reflecting the microbial physiological response to distinct host microenvironments. As the sar locus controls the synthesis of both extracellular and cell wall virulence determinants, these promoter-gfpUV constructs should be useful to characterize many aspects of S. aureus gene regulation in vivo.

Animals↗

Use of a promoter trap system in Bacillus anthracis and Bacillus subtilis for the development of recombinant protective antigen-based vaccines.

We have recently reported Bacillus anthracis attenuated live vaccine strains efficiently expressing recombinant protective antigen (rPA) and have shown a direct correlation between the level of rPA secreted by these cells and efficacy (S. Cohen, I. Mendelson, Z. Altboum, D. Kobiler, E. Elhanany, T. Bino, M. Leitner, I. Inbar, H. Rosenberg, Y. Gozes, R. Barak, M. Fisher, C. Kronman, B. Velan, and A. Shafferman, Infect. Immun. 68:4549-4558, 2000). To isolate more potent Bacillus promoters for a further increase in the production of rPA, we developed a promoter trap system based on various gfp reporter genes adapted for use in both Bacillus subtilis and B. anthracis backgrounds. Accordingly, a B. anthracis library of 6,000 clones harboring plasmids with chromosomal B. anthracis DNA fragments inserted upstream from gfpuv was constructed. Based on fluorescence intensity, 57 clones carrying potentially strong promoters were identified, some of which were DNA sequenced. The most potent B. anthracis promoter identified (Pntr; 271 bp) was 500 times more potent than the native pagA promoter and 70 times more potent than the alpha-amylase promoter (Pamy). This very potent promoter was tested along with the other promoters (which are three, six, and eight times more potent than Pamy) for the ability to drive expression of rPA in either B. subtilis or B. anthracis. The number of cell-associated pre-PA molecules in B. anthracis was found to correlate well with the strength of the promoter. However, there appeared to be an upper limit to the amount of mature PA secreted into the medium, which did not exceed that driven by Pamy. Furthermore, the rPA constructs fused to the very potent promoters proved to be deleterious to the bacterial hosts and consequently led to genetic instability of the PA expression plasmid. Immunization with attenuated B. anthracis expressing rPA under the control of promoters more potent than Pamy was less efficient in eliciting anti-PA antibodies than that attained with Pamy. The results are consistent with the notion that overexpression of PA leads to severe secretion stress and have practical implications for the design of second-generation rPA-based vaccines.

Animals↗

Mutational analysis of the promoter recognized by Chlamydia and Escherichia coli sigma(28) RNA polymerase.

sigma(28) RNA polymerase is an alternative RNA polymerase that has been postulated to have a role in developmental gene regulation in Chlamydia. Although a consensus bacterial sigma(28) promoter sequence has been proposed, it is based on a relatively small number of defined promoters, and the promoter structure has not been systematically analyzed. To evaluate the sequence of the sigma(28)-dependent promoter, we performed a comprehensive mutational analysis of the Chlamydia trachomatis hctB promoter, testing the effect of point substitutions on promoter activity. We defined a -35 element recognized by chlamydial sigma(28) RNA polymerase that resembles the consensus -35 sequence. Within the -10 element, however, chlamydial sigma(28) RNA polymerase showed a striking preference for a CGA sequence at positions -12 to -10 rather than the longer consensus -10 sequence. We also observed a strong preference for this CGA sequence by Escherichia coli sigma(28) RNA polymerase, suggesting that this previously unrecognized motif is the critical component of the -10 promoter element recognized by sigma(28) RNA polymerase. Although the consensus spacer length is 11 nucleotides (nt), we found that sigma(28) RNA polymerase from both Chlamydia and E. coli transcribed a promoter with either an 11- or 12-nt spacer equally well. Altogether, we found very similar results for sigma(28) RNA polymerase from C. trachomatis and E. coli, suggesting that promoter recognition by this alternative RNA polymerase is well conserved among bacteria. The preferred sigma(28) promoter that we defined in the context of the hctB promoter is TAAAGwwy-n(11/12)-ryCGAwrn, where w is A or T, r is a purine, y is a pyrimidine, n is any nucleotide, and n(11/12) is a spacer of 11 or 12 nt.

Amino Acid Substitution↗

Phosphorylation of Bacillus subtilis transcription factor Spo0A stimulates transcription from the spoIIG promoter by enhancing binding to weak 0A boxes.

Activation of the spoIIG promoter at the onset of sporulation in Bacillus subtilis requires the regulatory protein, Spo0A, which binds to two sites in the promoter, sites 1 and 2. Phosphorylation of Spo0A is essential for the initiation of sporulation. Therefore, we examined the role of Spo0A phosphorylation in spoIIG promoter activation. Phosphorylation of Spo0A stimulated transcription from the spoIIG promoter in vitro. In DNAse I footprinting experiments with the spoIIG promoter, we found that phosphorylation of Spo0A increased its affinity for site 2 more than for site 1, which is the site to which nonphosphorylated Spo0A binds most avidly. This result could not be explained by increased cooperativity between Spo0A bound at sites 1 and 2 because the increased affinity for site 2 by phosphorylated Spo0A was also observed with a deletion derivative of the spoIIG promoter containing only site 2. We have located Spo0A-binding sequences in the spoIIG promoter by DMS protection assays and mutational analysis, and found that site 1 contains one higher-affinity binding sequence whereas site 2 contains two weaker-binding sites. Two substitutions in site 2 of the spoIIG promoter that change the sequence to be more like an optimal Spo0A-binding site were found to increase promoter activity. Moreover, phosphorylation of Spo0A was not required in vivo for activation of the spoIIG promoter containing these strong binding sites. The results suggest that the primary role for phosphorylation of Spo0A is to increase its affinity for specific sites rather than to activate an activity of Spo0A that acts on RNA polymerase at promoters.

Bacillus subtilis↗

Opine-regulated promoters and LysR-type regulators in the nopaline (noc) and octopine (occ) catabolic regions of Ti plasmids of Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

Essential steps in the uptake and catabolism of the plant tumor metabolites nopaline and octopine in Agrobacterium spp. are performed by proteins encoded in the nopaline catabolic (noc) and octopine catabolic (occ) regions of Ti plasmids. We investigated the opine activation of the genes by using (i) promoter studies of Agrobacterium spp. and (ii) analysis of the promoter interaction with the regulatory proteins NocR (noc) and OccR (occ). The noc region contained two nopaline-induced promoters (Pi1[noc] and Pi2[noc]) and one autogenously regulated promoter (Pr [control of NocR expression]). Pi2 and Pr overlapped and were divergently oriented (Pi2 [noc]). DNA binding studies and DNase I footprints indicated that NocR bound specifically to single binding sites in Pi1[noc] and Pi2/Pr[noc] and that Pi2 and Pr were regulated from the same binding site. The binding was independent of the inducer nopaline, and nopaline caused small changes in the footprint. The promoters in the noc and occ regions shared sequence motif and contained the sequence T-N11-A, which is characteristic for LysR-type-regulated promoters. The occ region contained one octopine-induced and one autogenously regulated promoter (Pi/Pr[occ]) in the same arrangement as Pi2/Pr[noc] in the noc region. Promoter deletions indicated that sequences flanking the OccR binding site determined the extent of induction, although they did not bind OccR. The promoter bound OccR in the absence and presence of octopine. The opine caused a change in the mobility of the DNA-protein complex with the complete promoter. The resected fragments did not reveal this opine-induced shift, and it was also not detectable with the DNA-NocR complexes with the two promoters of the noc region.

Agrobacterium tumefaciens↗

The -45 region of the Escherichia coli lac promoter: CAP-dependent and CAP-independent transcription.

The lactose (lac) operon promoter is positively regulated by the catabolite gene activator-cyclic AMP complex (CAP) that binds to the DNA located 61.5 bp upstream of the transcription start site. Between the CAP binding site and the core promoter sequence is a 13-bp sequence (from -38 to -50 [the -45 region]). The possible roles of the -45 region in determining the CAP-independent level of lac expression and in the CAP activation process were studied by isolating and characterizing random multisite mutations. Only a small percentage of mutants have dramatic effects on lac promoter activity. Among the mutations that did affect expression, a 26-fold range in lac promoter activity in vivo was observed in the CAP-independent activity. The highest level of CAP-independent lac expression (13-fold the level of the wild-type lac promoter) correlated with changes in the -40 to -45 sequence and required an intact RNA polymerase alpha subunit for in vitro expression, as expected for an upstream DNA recognition element. Mutant promoters varied in their ability to be stimulated by CAP in vivo, with levels ranging from 2-fold to the wild-type level of 22-fold. Only a change of twofold in responsiveness to CAP could be attributed to direct DNA sequence effects. The -40 to -45 sequence-dependent enhancement of promoter activity and CAP stimulation of promoter activity did not act additively. The mutant promoters also displayed other characteristics, such as the activation of nascent promoter-like activities overlapping lac P1 and, in one case, replicon-dependent changes in promoter activity.

Base Sequence↗

Analysis of promoter elements involved in the transcriptional initiation of RpoS-dependent Borrelia burgdorferi genes.

Borrelia burgdorferi, the causative agent of Lyme disease, encodes an RpoS ortholog (RpoS(Bb)) that controls the temperature-inducible differential expression of at least some of the spirochete's lipoprotein genes, including ospC and dbpBA. To begin to dissect the determinants of RpoS(Bb) recognition of, and selectivity for, its dependent promoters, we linked a green fluorescent protein reporter to the promoter regions of several B. burgdorferi genes with well-characterized expression patterns. Consistent with the expression patterns of the native genes/proteins in B. burgdorferi strain 297, we found that expression of the ospC, dbpBA, and ospF reporters in the spirochete was RpoS(Bb) dependent, while the ospE and flaB reporters were RpoS(Bb) independent. To compare promoter recognition by RpoS(Bb) with that of the prototype RpoS (RpoS(Ec)), we also introduced our panel of constructs into Escherichia coli. In this surrogate, maximal expression from the ospC, dbpBA, and ospF promoters clearly required RpoS, although in the absence of RpoS(Ec) the ospF promoter was weakly recognized by another E. coli sigma factor. Furthermore, RpoS(Bb) under the control of an inducible promoter was able to complement an E. coli rpoS mutant, although RpoS(Ec) and RpoS(Bb) each initiated greater activity from their own dependent promoters than they did from those of the heterologous sigma factor. Genetic analysis of the ospC promoter demonstrated that (i) the T(-14) in the presumptive -10 region plays an important role in sigma factor recognition in both organisms but is not as critical for transcriptional initiation by RpoS(Bb) as it is for RpoS(Ec); (ii) the nucleotide at the -15 position determines RpoS or sigma(70) selectivity in E. coli but does not serve the same function in B. burgdorferi; and (iii) the 110-bp region upstream of the core promoter is not required for RpoS(Ec)- or RpoS(Bb)-dependent activity in E. coli but is required for maximal expression from this promoter in B. burgdorferi. Taken together, the results of our studies suggest that the B. burgdorferi and E. coli RpoS proteins are able to catalyze transcription from RpoS-dependent promoters of either organism, but at least some of the nucleotide elements involved in transcriptional initiation and sigma factor selection in B. burgdorferi play a different role than has been described for E. coli.

Antigens, Bacterial↗

Spo0A-dependent activation of an extended -10 region promoter in Bacillus subtilis.

At the onset of endospore formation in Bacillus subtilis the DNA-binding protein Spo0A directly activates transcription from promoters of about 40 genes. One of these promoters, Pskf, controls expression of an operon encoding a killing factor that acts on sibling cells. AbrB-mediated repression of Pskf provides one level of security ensuring that this promoter is not activated prematurely. However, Spo0A also appears to activate the promoter directly, since Spo0A is required for Pskf activity in a DeltaabrB strain. Here we investigate the mechanism of Pskf activation. DNase I footprinting was used to determine the locations at which Spo0A bound to the promoter, and mutations in these sites were found to significantly reduce promoter activity. The sequence near the -10 region of the promoter was found to be similar to those of extended -10 region promoters, which contain a TRTGn motif. Mutational analysis showed that this extended -10 region, as well as other base pairs in the -10 region, is required for Spo0A-dependent activation of the promoter. We found that a substitution of the consensus base pair for the nonconsensus base pair at position -9 of Pskf produced a promoter that was active constitutively in both deltaabrB and deltaspo0A deltaabrB strains. Therefore, the base pair at position -9 of Pskf makes its activity dependent on Spo0A binding, and the extended -10 region motif of the promoter contributes to its high level of activity.

Bacillus subtilis↗

Fixation of the unmethylated or the 5'-CCGG-3' methylated adenovirus late E2A promoter-cat gene construct in the genome of hamster cells: gene expression and stability of methylation patterns.

The late E2A promoter of adenovirus type 2 (Ad2) DNA can be inactivated by in vitro methylation of three 5'-CCGG-3' sequences at positions +23, +5, and -215 relative to the cap site in this promoter. This inactivation has been documented in transient expression experiments both in Xenopus laevis oocytes and in mammalian cells (K.-D. Langner, L. Vardimon, D. Renz, and W. Doerfler, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81:2950-2954, 1984; K.-D. Langner, U. Weyer, and W. Doerfler, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83:1598-1602, 1986). In the present study, in vitro-methylated or unmethylated promoter-gene assemblies were permanently fixed by integration in the hamster genome. In individually established cell lines, the degree of promoter methylation was correlated to gene activity. The pAd2E2AL-CAT construct, in which the late E2A promoter controls expression of the procaryotic chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (cat) gene, was fixed in BHK21 hamster cells by cotransfection with and selection for the pSV2-neo construct (P. J. Southern and P. Berg, J. Mol. Appl. Genet. 1:327-341, 1982) in which the early simian virus 40 promoter controls the gene for neomycin phosphotransferase. The pAd2E2AL-CAT construct was transfected in the unmethylated or in the 5'-CCGG-3' methylated form. The pSV2-neo plasmid was cotransfected in the unmethylated form. The stability of in vitro-imposed methylation patterns and cat gene expression were followed and correlated in a number of established cell lines which contained the constructs integrated in a non-rearranged configuration. The foreign DNA did not persist in the episomal state but was integrated, frequently in multiple tandems of the plasmid DNA. Among 19 cell lines established after transfecting the unmethylated pAd2E2AL-CAT construct, the late E2A promoter remained unmethylated (examined in 10 cell lines), and the cat gene was expressed in 18 cell lines. On the other hand, among 14 cell lines which were generated by transfection with the methylated construct, 7 cell lines did not express the cat gene, and the three 5'-CCGG-3' sequences in the late E2A promoter remained almost completely methylated. In five cell lines, the E2A promoter sequences were partly demethylated and the cat gene was expressed at low levels. Last, in two cell lines, demethylations were found to be extensive and strong cat expression was observed. It remained a question of considerable interest what factors determined the stability of methylation patterns that had been preimposed by in vitro methylation on specific sequences in a promoter, after this promoter was fixed by integration in the mammalian genome.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Acetyltransferases↗

Mutational analysis of cis elements involved in E2 modulation of human papillomavirus type 16 P97 and type 18 P105 promoters.

cis-Acting elements involved in E2 modulation of human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV-16) P97 promoter activity and HPV-18 P105 promoter activity were examined. In transfected primary human keratinocytes, each promoter had a basal activity that could be repressed by the bovine papillomavirus type 1 E2 gene product. Mutational analysis of the E2-binding sites in the long control region upstream of each promoter revealed that E2 repression was mediated through the E2-binding sites proximal to each promoter. In the context of a mutated E2-binding site at the promoter proximal position, the HPV-16 P97 and HPV-18 P105 promoters could be transactivated by E2. E2-mediated repression of HPV-18 P105 promoter activity was shown to be a transcriptional effect. The interaction of E2 with promoter-proximal E2-binding sites is likely to be important for the controlled expression of viral genes transcribed from the HPV-16 P97 promoter and the HPV-18 P105 promoter in infected human genital epithelial cells.

Base Sequence↗

Inhibition of viral and cellular promoters by human wild-type p53.

Mutation of the p53 tumor suppressor gene is a recurring event in a variety of human cancers. Wild-type p53 may regulate cell proliferation and has recently been shown to repress transcription from several cellular promoters. We studied the effects of wild-type and mutant human p53 on the human proliferating-cell nuclear antigen promoter and on several viral promoters including the simian virus 40 early promoter-enhancer, the herpes simplex virus type 1 thymidine kinase and UL9 promoters, the human cytomegalovirus major immediate-early promoter-enhancer, and the long terminal repeat promoters of Rous sarcoma virus, human immunodeficiency virus type 1, and human T-cell lymphotropic virus type I. HeLa cells were cotransfected with a wild-type or mutant p53 expression vector and plasmids containing a chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter gene under viral (or cellular) promoter control. Expression of wild-type p53 correlated with a consistent and significant (6- to 76-fold) reduction of reporter enzyme activity. A mutation at amino acid 143 of p53 releases this inhibition significantly with all the promoters studied. Expression of a p53 mutated at any one of the five amino acid positions 143, 175, 248, 273, and 281 also correlated with a much smaller (one- to sixfold) reduction of reporter enzyme activity from the herpes simplex virus type 1 thymidine kinase promoter. These mutant forms of p53 are found in various cancer cells. Thus, failure of tumor suppression correlates with loss of the promoter inhibitory effect of p53.

Antigens, Neoplasm↗

Long-term promoter activity during herpes simplex virus latency.

The ability to direct foreign gene expression from the herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) genome during an acute or latent infection is a subject of increasing importance in the utilization of HSV vectors for gene therapy. Little is known about the types of transcription factors present in neurons or about whether different neuronal populations within a ganglion vary in their complement of these factors. With respect to HSV-1 latency, it is not known how or why the latency-associated transcript (LAT) promoter is able to function continually during latency while all other viral promoters are inactive. To further studies of these two phenomena, we constructed seven recombinant viruses with various promoter constructs driving expression of the lacZ reporter gene. Each construct was inserted into HSV-1 at the glycoprotein C locus, and recombinant viruses were evaluated for the ability to express beta-galactosidase during acute and latent viral infections in murine dorsal root ganglia. During acute infection of murine dorsal root ganglia, the activities of the promoters varied over a wide range. Constructs containing the murine metallothionein promoter (MT1), the phosphoglycerate kinase promoter, the Moloney murine leukemia virus long terminal repeat (LTR), or the region upstream of and including the HSV LAT core promoter (LAT) were active during the acute but not the latent phase of infection. The addition of transcription factor binding sites present in the upstream LAT region to the MT1 and LTR promoters (LAT-MT1 and LAT-LTR, respectively) significantly increased acute-phase expression. Despite these high initial rates of transcription, of all the promoter constructs only LAT-LTR was able to remain transcriptionally active after the establishment of a latent state. Thus, the Moloney murine leukemia virus LTR provides a DNA element which functions to prevent promoter inactivation during latency. An analogous HSV long-term-expression element is evidently not present in the upstream LAT promoter, indicating that the HSV long-term-expression function is provided by a region outside of that which gives high-level neuronal expression during the acute phase of infection.

Animals↗

Transcriptional activation by the human cytomegalovirus immediate-early proteins: requirements for simple promoter structures and interactions with multiple components of the transcription complex.

We have utilized a number of well-defined, simple, synthetic promoters (upstream factor binding sites and TATA elements) to analyze the activation mechanisms of the human cytomegalovirus immediate-early (IE) proteins. We found that the 86-kDa IE protein (known as IEP86, IE2(559aa), or ppUL122a) can recognize and activate a variety of simple promoters, in agreement with the observation that it is a promiscuous activator. However, in the comparison of otherwise identical promoters IEP86 does have preferences for specific TATA elements (hsp70 > adenovirus E2 > simian virus 40 early) and specific upstream transcription factor binding sites (CAAT > SP1 approximately Tef-1 > ATF; no activation with AP1 or OCT). In contrast, the 72-kDa IE protein (known as IEP72, IE1(491aa), or ppUL123) alone did not significantly activate the simple promoters under our experimental conditions. However, each promoter activated by IEP86 was synergistically affected by the addition of IEP72. In addition, the 55-kDa IE protein (IEP55, a splice variant form of IE2, IE2(425aa), or ppUL122b) repeatedly had a negative effect, downregulating the activation of promoters caused by IEP86 and the synergy of IEP86 and IEP72. We show that the ability of IEP86 to activate many simple promoters correlates not only with its previously described ability to interact with the TATA-binding protein (TBP) (B. A. Furnari, E. Poma, T. F. Kowalik, S.-M. Huong, and E.-S. Huang, J. Virol. 67:4981-4991, 1993; C. Hagemeier, S. Walker, R. Caswell, T. Kouzarides, and J. Sinclair, J. Virol. 66:4452-4456, 1992; R. Jupp, S. Hoffman, R. M. Stenberg, J. A. Nelson, and P. Ghazal, J. Virol. 67:7539-7546, 1993) but also with its ability to interact with the transcription factors which bind to the upstream element of promoters it activated (e.g., SP1 and Tef-1 but not Oct-1). This ability to have multiple interactions with the promoter complex may be crucial for transcriptional activation, since the IE proteins cannot activate promoters having only a TATA element or only an upstream transcription factor binding site. In addition, we show that proteins which bind IEP86 also bind to IEP55. Thus, the negative effect on transcription noted with IEP55 may be the result of competition with IEP86 for interaction with the promoter complex. The synergy caused by IEP72 appears to be mediated by a more indirect mechanism. This is suggested by our observation that IEP72 could not bind to any of the proteins tested (TBP, Tef-1, or Oct-1) or to IEP86.

Antigens, Polyomavirus Transforming↗