Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “PEDIATRICS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,585 records · Page 88Linked to original sources

Sedation patterns in pediatric and general community hospital emergency departments.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although pediatric sedation (PS) is widely used in emergency departments (ED), the practice of PS in general community hospital (GH) ED has not been described. We surveyed PS practice patterns in pediatric hospitals (CH) and GH and compared frequency and usage between the two groups. METHODS: All CH (n = 115) and 400 randomly selected GH were surveyed. Alcohol and drug detoxification, psychiatric, chronic care, rehabilitation, and specialty facilities were excluded. Data were collected on hospital type (pediatric or community), location (urban, suburban, rural), annual visits, academic affiliation (presence of an emergency medicine residency or pediatric emergency medicine fellowship in the hospital), and sedation agents used. RESULTS: Of 515 hospitals surveyed, 238 responded [84/115 CH (73%), 154/400 GH (39%)] yielding an overall response rate of 46%. Of the responding CH the majority were urban [57 (68%) were urban, 15 (18%) suburban, and 12 (14%) rural]. GH were more evenly distributed by location [44/153 (29%) were urban, 49/153 (32%) suburban, and 60/153 (39%) rural]. Eight (5%) GH had emergency medicine residencies, while 39 (46%) CH had pediatric emergency medicine fellowships. The mean annual pediatric volume was 38,000 for CH and 6500 for GH. For the four specified clinical scenarios, representing the most common ED procedures using sedation (laceration repair, fracture reduction, radiologic imaging), GH performed significantly fewer sedations than CH when matched for pediatric volume. PS was less frequently used among rural GH compared to suburban (P < 0.01) and urban GH (P < 0.01). Midazolam was listed as the most frequently used drug in all three geographic locations for both CH and GH. CH listed fentanyl as a second agent, while GH preferred meperidine. Fentanyl and ketamine were listed as preferred agents only in CH. For cranial computerized tomography, chloral hydrate was listed as the drug of choice by both CH and GH. Both CH and GH listed "relief of pain and anxiety" as the first and "agitation control" as the second most common reason for using sedation. CH and GH listed "the risks outweigh the benefits" as the primary reason and "ED too busy/takes too much time" as the secondary reason for not using sedation. CONCLUSIONS: GH performed fewer sedations than did CH when matched for pediatric volume in all geographic locations and for the most common ED procedures using sedation. Since 1989, sedation patterns have shifted in CH to include the short-acting agents, while GH (with the exception of midazolam) continue to prefer the long-acting agents. Midazolam is now the most frequently used sedation agent for ED procedures in both CH and GH.

Acute Disease↗

Pediatric trauma management in a rural Wisconsin trauma center.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the results of pediatric trauma care managed with a cooperative effort by general surgeons and pediatric intensivists in comparison to national standards. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Referral level II trauma center in rural Wisconsin. PATIENTS: All pediatric trauma patients age 16 and younger admitted to the hospital from 1990 to 1993. METHODS: Demographics, mechanisms of injury, revised trauma score (RTS), injury severity score (ISS), surgical procedures, need for intensive care, and outcome were examined. All patients were primarily managed by the trauma surgery service. Those patients requiring intensive care were managed jointly by the trauma surgery service and pediatric intensivists. Outcome was predicted by TRISS analysis; patients identified as "unexpected deaths" underwent critical clinical review to determine potential for survival. RESULTS: There were 531 pediatric trauma admissions. The mean age was 9.0 +/- 6.2 (SEM) years and two thirds of the patients were boys. Over half of all injuries were from falls, recreational activities, and motor vehicle crashes. There were few penetrating injuries. The mean RTS was 7.58 +/- 0.05, and the majority of patients had an ISS below 10. Sixty-two percent of patients required surgical procedures, most of which were orthopedic. Fourteen percent of patients were admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit. There were 13 deaths for a mortality rate of 2.4%. TRISS analysis identified six deaths as unexpected. Four drownings were not included in TRISS analysis, and there were no unexpected survivors. Of the six unexpected deaths, there were no significant management errors identified on careful review. CONCLUSIONS: Cooperation between general surgeons and pediatric intensivists can result in excellent pediatric trauma care in a rural level II trauma center.

Accidental Falls↗

Pediatric pre-hospital advanced life support care in an urban setting.

OBJECTIVE: To describe pediatric advanced life support (PALS) in a single urban environment and clarify educational priorities for ALS pre-hospital providers and pediatric medical control physicians. METHODS: Retrospective observational review of all pediatric pre-hospital PALS transport and medical control records of the two-tiered, unified, municipal emergency medical service of the City of Boston (catchment area 590,000) over a 1-year period. RESULTS: Of the 555 pediatric patients receiving ALS transport, 38% were for respiratory emergencies, 24% for nonrespiratory medical emergencies, 19% for traffic-related blunt trauma, and 10% for penetrating trauma. Two percent involved cardiac arrests. The most frequent procedures performed were intravenous (IV) cannulation (n = 184, 33%), bag-mask ventilation (n = 28, 5%) and intubation (n = 15, 3%). Intraosseous access was only performed in three patients (0.5%). Fifty ALS providers in the EMS system averaged pediatric IV cannulation 3.7 times, intubation 0.3 times, and intraosseous access 0.06 times per provider per year. On-line medical control was requested in 28 % of PALS transports. The chief complaints managed by medical control closely mirrored the distribution of all ALS transports. The most frequent medication ordered by on-line medical control was additional nebulized albuterol after standing orders (off-line medical control) had been exhausted. CONCLUSIONS: A limited number of chief complaints make up the majority of PALS transports. Initial and continuing education for ALS providers needs to reflect the importance of these critical entities. Education for urban pre-hospital providers should reflect that certain procedures will be only executed every few years (eg, pediatric intubation) or once in the career of an ALS pre-hospital provider (eg, intraosseous access). With a limited amount of pediatric teaching time, paramedic education will have to strike a careful balance between teaching about the chief complaints most frequently encountered and teaching rare, high-risk procedures that could provide maximal support for the uncommon critically ill child. On-line medical control physicians need to be prepared to direct and support the management by ALS pre-hospital providers for the chief complaints most frequently seen in pediatric patients.

Adolescent↗

Infection in prolonged pediatric critical illness: A prospective four-year study based on knowledge of the carrier state.

OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to determine the rate, timing, and incidence density of infections occurring in a subgroup of patients requiring a prolonged stay in a regional pediatric intensive care unit. DESIGN: Prospective, observational cohort study over 4 yrs. SETTING: This epidemiologic descriptive study was performed in a university hospital 20-bed pediatric intensive care unit. PATIENTS: Critically ill children requiring > or = 4 days of intensive care. INTERVENTIONS: The microbial carrier state of the children was monitored by surveillance cultures of throat and rectum, obtained on admission and twice weekly afterward. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data are presented on a total of 1,241 children, accounting for 1,443 admissions to the unit, corresponding to 18,203 patient days. The median pediatric index of mortality was 0.063 (interquartile range, 0.025-0.131), and the mortality rate in this subset of children was 9.6%. Five hundred twenty children had infections, an overall infection rate of 41.9% (520 of 1,241); 14.5% (180 of 1,241) of the children developed viral and 33.0% (410 of 1,241) developed bacterial/yeast infections. The incidence of bloodstream infection was 20.1 and lower airway infection 9.1 episodes per 1,000 patient days. We found that 13.3% of the children were infected with a bacterial/yeast microorganism acquired on the pediatric intensive care unit; 4.0% (50 of 1,241) of children developed infections due to resistant microorganisms. There were a total of 803 bacterial/yeast infectious episodes, of which 59.8% (480) were due to microorganisms imported in the patients' admission flora. These primary endogenous infections predominantly occurred within the first week of pediatric intensive care unit stay. The other 38.9% (312) were caused by microorganisms acquired on the pediatric intensive care unit. A total of 38 viral infections (24.5%) were acquired during pediatric intensive care unit stay. CONCLUSIONS: Two thirds of all infections diagnosed in children with prolonged illness on pediatric intensive care unit were due to microorganisms present in the patients' admission flora.

Carrier State↗

Pediatric critical care medicine: planning for our research future.

OBJECTIVE: To introduce to the pediatric critical care medicine community a new program in pediatric critical care medicine at the National Institutes of Health. DATA SOURCE: Summary of literature review and conference proceedings. DATA SYNTHESIS: At the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), a new program in pediatric critical care and rehabilitation research has been established in the National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research. The program is directed by a pediatric intensivist and is focused on developing research directed toward improving long-term outcomes in pediatric critical care and on incorporating pediatric rehabilitation medicine as a partner in this goal. To provide strategic direction for the new program, the NICHD sponsored a planning conference May 3-4, 2002, at the NICHD in Bethesda, MD. The conference invitees represented a broad range of pediatric critical care medicine clinical and research interests, expertise, and career stages. It also included individuals with expertise in rehabilitation research. CONCLUSION: The composition of the new program, including its link to physical medicine and rehabilitation, is discussed. In addition, recommendations by the conference participants and program director are provided to foster the development of more randomized, controlled clinical trials and to develop successful clinician scientists in pediatric critical care medicine.

Child↗

Physician assistants as physician extenders in the pediatric intensive care unit setting-A 5-year experience.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the scope of practice and complementary role of physician assistants as physician extenders in the pediatric intensive care unit. DESIGN: Descriptive report of a 5-yr experience using a physician assistant-resident staffing model in comparison to the traditional resident-only coverage. SETTING: Six-bed pediatric intensive care unit at a tertiary care center subject to longstanding New York Hospital Code 405 restrictions on resident work hours. INTERVENTIONS: Orientation, training, credentialing, and evaluation of physician assistants. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: New Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education regulations based on the longstanding New York Hospital Code 405 limit the number of resident hours worked per week. Our hospital employs physician assistants as physician extenders in the pediatric intensive care unit to enable regulatory compliance. Physician assistants were oriented for a period of 6 months to 1 yr to develop skill competencies, observe and learn pediatric intensive care unit practices and procedures, and complete credentialing to perform traditionally physician, nursing, and respiratory therapist functions. Physician assistants were then assigned to an independent but supervised patient care role similar to that of a resident physician. The impact of the physician assistant program was assessed by the attending physicians, and resident opinions were surveyed. CONCLUSIONS: Physician assistants play a complementary role as physician extenders in the pediatric intensive care unit, enabling compliance with New York state and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education resident work hour regulations. Physician assistants perform similar tasks and activities as the pediatric intensive care unit residents and integrate well with them in enhancing bedside patient care. Over time, physician assistants provide additional direction to the residents by virtue of their familiarity with unit-specific policies and procedures and repetitive pediatric intensive care unit practice patterns. As multifunctional members of the health care team, they support nursing and respiratory therapy functions and improve the day-to-day functioning of the unit. The physician assistant serves as a key member of the pediatric intensive care unit transport team. Limitations observed include high job turnover rates among the physician assistants and confusion between their role as shift workers or professional employees.

Accreditation↗

Steroid use before pediatric cardiac operations using cardiopulmonary bypass: an international survey of 36 centers.

OBJECTIVE: Steroid administration before pediatric cardiac operations using cardiopulmonary bypass has been shown to modulate the inflammatory response and reduce myocardial injury. We hypothesized that current steroid administration practices among pediatric cardiac surgical centers are highly variable. DESIGN: Questionnaire survey. SETTING: Pediatric intensive care units. SUBJECTS: All members of the Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Society. INTERVENTIONS: A self-administered survey was sent to >130 members and 70 institutions participating in the Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Society. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Thirty-six questionnaires were returned: 14 international and 22 domestic centers. Cumulatively, these centers treat >11,000 pediatric cardiac patients per year. Ninety-seven percent (35 of 36) of these centers report the use of steroids before cardiopulmonary bypass, yet only 40% (14 of 35) administer steroids with every case. Of the 21 centers that selectively use steroids, 12 do so only for neonates, five administer steroids based on surgeon preference, and four administer steroids for cases anticipated to involve bypass time >2 hrs or deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. Of the 35 centers using steroids, 11 deliver a single dose in the circuit prime, 18 administer a single dose to the patient, and six give multiple doses. The timing of the steroid dose to the patient is variable; 12 centers administer a dose on induction of anesthesia; six centers administer the dose 2-12 hrs before operation. Regimens in the six centers using multiple doses of steroids before cardiopulmonary bypass are as follows: administration at induction and in the prime (two centers); 12 hrs preoperatively and at induction (one center); prime, induction, and 6 hrs preoperatively (one center); prime and midnight preoperatively (one center); and prime plus 2 and 8 hrs preoperatively (one center). Eight centers continue steroid administration following bypass. CONCLUSION: Although nearly all centers surveyed administer steroids before cardiopulmonary bypass, the type, dosing, route, and timing of administration are highly variable. The inconsistencies in these data and the pediatric literature would support the undertaking of a large, multiple-center clinical trial to evaluate the risks and benefits of steroid administration before pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents↗

The impact of training and experience on EMS providers' feelings toward pediatric emergencies in a rural state.

OBJECTIVE: To determine which factors of training and education influence emergency medical technicians' (EMTs) feelings toward pediatric emergencies in a rural state. METHODS: A 12-question survey was adapted from a previously studied, nationally administered questionnaire and distributed to all registered EMTs in the state of Maine. Data collected included level of EMT, number of pediatric calls per month, and hours of pediatric continuing education (CE) received. Questions were based upon a 5-point Likert scale and explored level of comfort with various areas of training and education, types of emergencies encountered, and ages of patients. RESULTS: Eighty-seven percent of all respondents experienced 3 or less (0-3) calls for pediatric emergencies per month, and 73% of all respondents reported receiving 8 or fewer hours of CE in pediatric topics over the previous 2 years. Advanced level of training (EMT-P or EMT-I vs. EMT-B) was associated with increased comfort levels in all areas except Resources (P < 0.05). Additional hours of CE (4+ vs. 0-3) was associated with increased comfort levels in all areas queried (P < 0.05). Increased call volume (4+ vs. 0-3) was associated with increased comfort levels for: children <4 years old, most skills and chief complaints (except Pediatric Assessment by Age, Child Abuse, and Newborn Deliveries), and most aspects of training (except Confidence and Resources) (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Level of EMT and hours of CE influence the level of comfort felt by EMTs when confronting a pediatric emergency. Specific CE requirements for topics in pediatric emergency medicine should be considered for all EMTs.

Age Factors↗

Impact of a pediatric primary care office-based mock code program on physician and staff confidence to perform life-saving skills.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have described that pediatric offices are ill-prepared for medical emergencies. Pediatric "mock codes" have been utilized to increase the emergency preparedness of inpatient medical units for several decades. These practice drills have been shown to both increase practitioners' confidence and decrease anxiety during actual resuscitations. Although the use of mock codes is recommended in the outpatient setting, these benefits have yet to be demonstrated for office-based practitioners. OBJECTIVE: We conducted this study to determine whether mock codes performed in pediatric primary care offices increase practitioner confidence to perform life-saving skills. METHODS: Pediatric group practices participated in a clinical trial of an office-based, 2-step, emergency preparedness training. First, physicians and staffs attended a 1-hour didactic program which included staff education, office emergency protocols, emergency equipment and medications, and guidelines on instituting a mock code program. Second, each practice participated in a 10-15-minute mock code exercise. The drill was conducted by pediatric advanced life support instructors. After the code, a 30-minute feedback session was conducted which reviewed office coordination, individual skill performance, and approach to resuscitation. Each participating practice also received an infant manikin and a text complete with several mock codes scenarios written specifically for the pediatric primary care office. Evaluation of the intervention consisted of 2 components. (1) Pre- and postintervention completion of a self-administered survey assessed participants' comfort in emergency situations and confidence to perform specific life-saving skills, using an ordinal scale: 1 = "strongly agree" to 5 = "strongly disagree". (2) Practices were contacted by telephone 12 months after the training to determine whether they had implemented improvements in emergency preparedness, including instituting mock codes, preparing a written emergency protocol and purchasing new emergency equipment and medications. RESULTS: Eleven group pediatric practices participated, which were representative of urban, suburban, and rural offices in southwestern Pennsylvania. Ninety-seven of a total 164 (59%) physicians and staff members completed both pre- and postintervention surveys. Practitioner participants were analyzed in 2 groups. Group 1 consisted of physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants; group 2 consisted of registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, and medical assistants. Comparison of pre- versus postintervention surveys in both of these groups revealed significant improvement in reported confidence to perform resuscitation skills that were included in the mock code after the training: airway positioning (group 1, 67% vs. 94%, P < 0.001; group 2, 55% vs. 75%, P = 0.003), airway suctioning, (group 1, 64% vs. 88%, P = 0.005; group 2, 27% vs. 51%, P < 0.001), and bag-mask assisted ventilation (group 1, 82% vs. 91%, P = 0.003; group 2, 39% vs. 71%, P < 0.001). In addition, group 1 reported more confidence in their ability to place an intraossesous line (24% vs. 39%, P = 0.003) and group 2 showed a significant increase in their confidence to administer oxygen (65% vs. 84%, P < 0.001). As a result of the mock code, 83% of all participants, both medical and nonmedical staffs, and 96% of physicians felt less anxious about medical emergencies in the office. Twelve months after the conclusion of the program, 18% of offices had conducted 1 or more mock codes, 64% of offices had written an emergency protocol, and 27% of offices had acquired essential resuscitation medications or equipment. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study support the recommendation that mock codes should be performed in the pediatric primary care setting to improve practitioner confidence and decrease practitioner anxiety.

Child↗

Continuous hemodiafiltration in pediatric critical care patients.

Continuous hemodiafiltration (CHDF) is an essential procedure in critical care. However, application of this therapy to pediatric patients is associated with several problems derived from their smaller body size and weight compared with adults. We have successfully conducted CHDF in pediatric patients including newborns by taking such problems into consideration and carefully coping with them. The present study consisted of 60 pediatric patients treated with CHDF. Clinical efficacy and safety of CHDF in pediatric patients were assessed in these patients by reviewing patient clinical records. The 60 patients treated with CHDF included 27 males and 33 females. Their body weight ranged from 700 g to 53.0 kg. The mean CHDF duration was 6.80 +/- 6.94 days. Blood access was provided in a veno-venous mode in 42 patients, and an arterio-venous mode in 18 patients. Of the 60 pediatric patients receiving CHDF, 31 patients survived without serious complications, achieving a survival rate of 51.7%. Successful CHDF in pediatric patients was achieved by careful and exact execution of the following countermeasures to overcome problems specific to application of this therapy to pediatric patients: minimization of the priming volume; use of colloid solutions or whole blood as priming solution; maintaining secure blood access; selection of an appropriate anticoagulant; temperature control of both the patient's body and components of the hemofiltration circuit. In pediatric critical care, CHDF is safely applicable to the critically ill and expected to produce a wide spectrum of clinical efficacy just as in adults.

Adolescent↗

The development of pediatric nephrology.

Pediatric nephrology, as a discipline, arose from descriptive studies of childhood glomerulonephritis in Europe and the field of pediatric metabolism in the United States. While pediatric scientists before 1950 were concerned with fluid and electrolyte metabolism, regulation of intracellular and extracellular fluid, acid-base homeostasis, and parenteral fluid therapy, the defined field of nephrology developed after the Second World War around six major advances: ACTH and glucocorticoid therapy for nephrotic syndrome; renal biopsy to diagnose glomerular disease; the role of immunologic factors in glomerular injury; the use of dialysis as renal replacement therapy; renal transplantation as the optimal form of therapy in children with end stage renal failure; and recognition of renal disease in the etiology of 80% of cases of childhood hypertension. These discoveries led to focused research, the definition of specific training in nephrology, establishment of an American, European, and an International Society of Pediatric Nephrology, as well as an American Sub-Board of Pediatric Nephrology, and the inception of a journal, Pediatric Nephrology, now in its 15th year. Major research themes have included developmental nephrology, transplantation immunology, and concerns about growth in children with renal disease. Many clinical entities have been described in detail, some of which are almost confined to children. The scientific basis of pediatric nephrology, ongoing patient care needs, and its technical aspects - renal biopsy, dialysis and transplantation - assure its continuing future as a major pediatric discipline on all continents.

Child↗

Pediatric environmental health competencies for specialists.

BACKGROUND: Because environmental health problems are complex and require specialty training, the Ambulatory Pediatric Association initiated a 3-year postgraduate fellowship in Pediatric Environmental Health. OBJECTIVE: To develop competencies for the specialty of Pediatric Environmental Health and appropriate measures (performance indicators) for the achievement of these competencies. METHODS: The President of the Ambulatory Pediatric Association appointed a 6-member Fellowship Oversight Committee to guide the development of the Fellowship Program and to draft competencies for fellows in Pediatric Environmental Health. The Committee developed a list of proposed competencies for graduates of Pediatric Environmental Health fellowships. These were skills identified as very important for a specialist to have for minimal competency in the practice of pediatric environmental health. RESULTS: Twenty-seven Pediatric Environmental Health competencies are proposed. The competencies are presented from 3 separate perspectives: academic, individual patient care, and community advocacy. Each competency has a list of suggested performance indicators. CONCLUSION: These competencies are intended to assist in structuring the training experience, achieving consensus with respect to expectations of fellows and faculty, providing opportunities for fellows to assess their own needs or gaps in training, and identifying the expertise of fellowship graduates to potential employers.

Clinical Competence↗

Teaching testicular self-examination: education and practices in pediatric residents.

OBJECTIVE: Although testicular cancer is the most common cancer among 15- to 35-year-old male individuals, physicians seldom conduct testicular self-examination (TSE) education, thus potentially missing opportunities for early detection. Pediatric residents should be learning TSE skills training and be encouraged to incorporate them into routine practice. There are no published studies addressing the medical education and practices of pediatric residents regarding testicular cancer and TSE. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of pediatric residents who teach TSE to their adolescent patients, and significant factors related to teaching TSE. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted of all pediatric residents at 2 pediatric residency programs during the 2000 to 2001 academic year. A self-administered, 37-item Internet-based questionnaire was developed, pilot-tested, and then used. Statistical analyses included frequency distributions, univariate analysis, correlation coefficient, and logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 129 (61%) of the eligible pediatric residents participated. Fourteen (29%) of the male residents reported performing TSE on themselves at least once a month, and 30 (61%) reported performing TSE at least every 3 months. The most frequent reason cited for not performing TSE monthly was "know how, but forget to do it" (97%). Forty (40%) of all residents reported teaching TSE to their 12- to 21-year-old male patients during a routine annual physical examination. The 2 most common reasons for not teaching TSE were "never thought about including it" (36%) and "lack of time" (29%). The senior-level residents reported teaching TSE to their male patients during a routine annual physical examination more often (51%) than the first-year pediatric residents (21%; odds ratio [OR]: 3.99; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.5-10.5). There was no difference in teaching TSE between the male residents who report performing TSE (43%) and those who do not perform TSE (37%; OR: 1.27; 95% CI: 0.36-4.5) and between male and female residents (OR: 0.9; 95% CI: 0.44-1.9). There was no association between knowledge of TSE and testicular cancer with teaching TSE or practicing TSE. In a logistic regression model, confidence in testicular examination (OR: 3.1; 95% CI: 1.2-7.9), confidence teaching TSE (OR: 3.6; 95% CI: 1.2-10.9), and knowing someone with testicular cancer (OR: 2.4; 95% CI: 1.0-5.8) were associated with residents' teaching TSE to their patients. CONCLUSION: Fewer than half of the pediatric residents teach TSE to their adolescent patients. Confidence in performing a testicular examination, confidence in teaching TSE, and knowing someone with testicular cancer were the most important factors related to teaching TSE. This information could be used to design an educational intervention to increase physician promotion of TSE and ultimately increase young males' TSE practices. Additional studies are recommended to determine the generalizability of these results.

Adolescent↗

Healthy Steps: a case study of innovation in pediatric practice.

Healthy Steps (HS) represents a significant innovation in the way pediatric primary care can be delivered. Based on the standards and principles of Bright Futures and the American Academy of Pediatrics Health Supervision Guidelines, HS enhances and expands traditional pediatric care by including a child development specialist (Healthy Steps specialist) as part of the pediatric practice team. Services offered by this person, typically a nurse, early childhood educator, or social worker, include more time to spend discussing preventive issues during well-child visits, home visits, a telephone information line exclusively addressing developmental and behavioral concerns, new written materials, and more seamless linkages to community resources and parent support groups. The original HS cohort consisted of 15 pediatric practices in a variety of settings (private practices, health centers, pediatric training programs). Evaluated for the effects of HS on their family were 3737 intervention and comparison families. HS families received significantly more preventive and developmental services, compared to families in the control group. HS families were also less likely to be dissatisfied with their pediatric primary care. Additionally, HS had a positive impact on parenting in many areas including adherence to health visits, nutritional practices, developmental stimulation, appropriate disciplinary techniques, and correct sleeping position. Other outcome measures (such as initiation or duration of breastfeeding, child development knowledge, sense of competence, and reports of child language development at 2 years of age) did not differ between intervention and comparison group. Compared to other early childhood intervention efforts, HS offers a comparable positive impact on parenting at a relatively inexpensive cost: an estimated 400 dollars per family per year (compared to 4500 dollars from Early Head Start). Approximately 3 years after the evaluation of HS ended, 10 of the original 24 sites are still in operation, and an additional 24 sites have started up. Although funding and reimbursement remain an important barrier, continued growth of HS suggests an abiding interest in this approach to expand and enhance preventive and developmental care in pediatric primary care.

Child↗

Poor formulation information in published pediatric drug trials.

OBJECTIVE: The International Conference on Harmonisation Steering Committee recommends that appropriate formulations be used in pediatric drug trials. However, a lack of formulation research and/or economic constraints means that appropriate formulations are not always used. It is important for investigators who report the results of pediatric drug trials to provide sufficient information on the formulation and method of administration to ensure that the results can be reproduced in other clinical studies (reliability) and, more important, implemented in clinical practice (validity). The objective of this study was to evaluate whether pediatric formulation information was adequately reported in recent published trials of oral medicines that included children who were younger than 12 years. METHODS: Studies that were published between July 2002 and June 2004 in 10 highly cited journals (5 pediatric and 5 general medicine) were hand-searched and data were extracted independently by 2 reviewers according to a protocol. Papers that reported oral medication studies that included children who were younger than 12 years were classified as containing adequate, some, or no information on drug formulation. RESULTS: Of 3992 papers reviewed, 76 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Only 28 (37%) gave adequate information for the study to be reproduced accurately, and 20 (26%) did not state the formulation used. When the formulation was reported, only 37 (49%) studies used a pediatric formulation (liquid, chewable tablet, granules). No significant differences between pediatric and general medical journals were seen, and no single journal consistently met the criteria for adequate information. CONCLUSION: Highly cited journals seem to permit inadequate formulation information in pediatric drug trials that they publish, impairing their validity and reliability. Authors should provide full formulation information in all pediatric clinical trial reports.

Child↗

Pediatric hospitalists: report of a leadership conference.

OBJECTIVES: To summarize a meeting of academic pediatric hospitalists and to describe the current state of the field. METHODS: The Ambulatory Pediatric Association sponsored a meeting for academic pediatric hospitalists in November 2003. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss and to define roles of academic pediatric hospitalists, including their roles as clinicians, educators, and researchers, and to discuss organizational issues and unique hospitalist issues within general academic pediatrics. Workshops were held in the areas of organization and administration, academic life, research, and education. A literature review was also conducted in the areas discussed. RESULTS: More than 130 physicians attended. Thirteen workshops were held, and all information was summarized in large-group sessions for all attendees. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric hospital medicine is a rapidly growing field, with an estimated 800 to 1000 pediatric hospitalists currently practicing. Initial work has defined the clinical environment and has begun to stake out a unique knowledge and skill set. The Pediatric Hospitalists in Academic Settings conference demonstrated the audience for additional development and the resources to move forward.

Hospitalists↗

Pediatric hospitalists: a systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews have demonstrated consistently decreased length of stay and costs in internal medicine hospitalist systems. Systematic reviews of pediatric hospitalist systems have not been conducted. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine the effects of pediatric hospitalist systems on length of stay, costs, quality of care, and provider satisfaction and experience. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library databases, and the Pediatric Academic Societies National Meeting research abstracts for all primary-data studies published or presented on pediatric hospitalist systems. Studies presenting primary data on efficiency, financial performance, clinical outcomes, or family, referring provider, and housestaff experience in hospitalist systems were included; review articles and case studies were excluded. To minimize publication bias, we contacted all primary authors to obtain information about unpublished studies. RESULTS: Of 47 publications reviewed, 20 were primary-data studies that met criteria for inclusion. Six of 7 studies that compared traditional and hospitalist systems of care demonstrated improvements in costs and/or length of stay in pediatric hospitalist systems. The average decrease in cost was 10%; average decrease in length of stay was 10%. Three of 3 economic analyses, however, demonstrate that efficiency gains do not generally translate into revenues for the hospitalist programs themselves; most hospitalist programs are currently losing money. Surveys of families, referring providers, and pediatric residents demonstrate neutral or improved experiences in hospitalist systems, although these data are less comprehensive. Data on quality of care are insufficient to draw conclusions. CONCLUSIONS: Emerging research suggests that pediatric hospitalist systems decrease hospital costs and length of stay without adversely affecting provider, parent, or housestaff experiences. The quality of care in pediatric hospitalist systems is unclear, because rigorous metrics to evaluate quality are lacking. Studies of the processes and outcomes of hospital care are needed.

Child↗

Have Medicaid reimbursements been a credible measure of the cost of pediatric care?

OBJECTIVE: Despite uncertain validity as a measure of cost, Medicaid reimbursements may be used to compare the costs of different pediatric interventions. We explored the credibility of Medicaid reimbursements as a measure of the costs of inpatient care associated with two different approaches to follow-up care for high-risk indigent infants. DESIGN: Analysis of Medicaid reimbursements within a randomized trial of primary follow-up care. PATIENTS: Infants </=1500 g at birth in a large county hospital (Parkland Memorial Hospital). INTERVENTION: Conventional care after nursery discharge (with well-baby care and care for chronic illnesses provided in our follow-up clinic) or primary care (with care for acute illnesses also provided in the follow-up clinic). Measures to prevent a lapse in Medicaid coverage were included in all clinic visits. OUTCOME MEASURES: The completeness, comparability, and plausibility of Medicaid reimbursements for inpatient care of the two groups between nursery discharge and 1 year adjusted age. RESULTS: A high percentage (90% to 91%) of both groups were enrolled in Medicaid. However, with fewer clinic visits in the conventional care group, Medicaid coverage often lapsed in this group, particularly among the highest risk infants. As a result, the proportion of hospital days reimbursed by Medicaid was substantially lower for conventional care than primary care infants (53% [92/174] vs 96% [298/310]). An even larger disparity was observed for pediatric intensive care days (10% [6/61] vs 100% [33/33]). Implausible Medicaid reimbursements included a lower reimbursement rate per day in the pediatric intensive care unit than on the pediatric floor (1 infant), a lower reimbursement rate per day for hospital care than home care (1 infant), and a mean reimbursement rate per day for our private pediatric teaching hospital ($1244/day) that did not exceed that for the private nonteaching pediatric hospital ($1268/day). The reimbursement rate for our public teaching hospital was particularly low ($507/day) despite a high acuity of illness (21% of hospital days in the pediatric intensive care unit). CONCLUSIONS: Without proper validation, reimbursements from Medicaid (or any program that replaces it) should not be assumed to provide an unbiased or acceptably accurate measure of the relative or absolute cost of pediatric health care interventions.

Continuity of Patient Care↗