Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “GERIATRICS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,585 records · Page 88Linked to original sources

Setting priorities for measures of performance for geriatric medical services.

We undertook a two-round Delphi study of the views of consultant geriatricians in three Health Regions on the relative appropriateness of 12 possible performance measures for geriatric services. We compared geriatricians' responses with those of 44 cognitively-intact day hospital patients. Of 138 geriatricians, 89 responded to the first round postal survey, 84 to the second round. The rank order of geriatricians' suggestions did not change from round one to round two, and there was convergence of opinion with a significant decrease in the coefficients of variation of the ranks (p < 0.05, Wilcoxon Test). Geriatricians and patients gave high priority to 'reducing disability' and 'improving quality of life', and low priority to 'reducing mortality'. Geriatricians gave higher priority than patients to 'consumer satisfaction', 'problem resolution' and 'efficient use of resources'. Patients gave higher priority to 'reducing burden on carers', 'measures of service activity' and 'avoiding institutional care'. The study shows that it is possible to obtain a consensus amongst geriatricians about the priorities for measuring the performance of geriatric medical services. Similarities to and differences from patients' views illustrate the need to engage more than one group in the debate about appropriate measures of performance. Findings in both groups give support to recent attempts to develop and use assessment methods for the measurement of disability and quality of life in clinical practice.

Activities of Daily Living↗

The prevalence of depression in geriatric medical outpatients.

One hundred and fifty-nine patients attending a geriatric medical outpatient clinic were screened for depression using the geriatric depression scale (GDS) and brief assessment schedule depression cards (BASDEC). Twenty-two (13.8%) patients screened positive with one or other test, 13 (8.2%) being positive with both screening tests. There was a highly significant correlation between the two screening tests but the BASDEC instrument was quicker and easier to administer. Eighteen of 22 patients who screened as positive proved to have clinical depression. On subsequent re-testing of 17 of these patients 4-6 weeks later, eight were still positive, but nine patients were now negative and subjectively felt better. These findings suggest the possibility of a transient mood disturbance occurring in elderly patients akin to recurrent brief depression seen in younger subjects, and have implications for starting therapy in apparently depressed elderly people.

Aged↗

Serological response to influenza vaccination and nutritional and functional status of patients in geriatric medical long-term care.

INTRODUCTION: in the UK the Department of Health recommends influenza vaccination for elderly people resident in institutional care. However, the efficacy of vaccination may be reduced in very frail elderly people with functional impairment, undernutrition and multiple pathologies. Nutritional and functional status is claimed to affect vaccine responses in healthy elderly subjects. We wished to determine if a relationship could be seen between nutritional and functional status and seroconversion in patients receiving long- term care. METHODS: all patients in geriatric medical long-term care were offered vaccine. Consenting patients had pre- and post-vaccine serology measured using single radial haemolysis. Anthropometry was measured to enable body mass index (BMI) to be calculated. Functional independence was assessed using the 20-point Barthel index. RESULTS: of 260 patients who received influenza vaccine, 137 (36 male, 101 female) consented to venesection for serology and thus form the study population. Mean age was 82 years (SD 7.9). The median Barthel score was 3/20 and the mean BMI was 21.6 (SD 4.6, range 13-36.2). Antibodies to influenza A were undetectable both pre- and post-vaccination in 63/137 patients. In 49 patients the antibody titre rose after vaccination and 25 had detectable antibody titres pre-vaccination which failed to rise post-vaccine. There were no significant associations between post-vaccination influenza antibody responses and BMI, Barthel score or age. CONCLUSION: frail elderly patients in geriatric medical long-term care had a poor antibody response to influenza vaccination. Within this group, serological responses could not be predicted by nutritional or functional status.

Aged↗

Adherence to recommendations of community-based comprehensive geriatric assessment programmes.

BACKGROUND: non-adherence to the recommendations of short-term community-based consultative comprehensive geriatric assessment programmes is a threat to the effectiveness of these programmes. OBJECTIVE: to synthesize the literature on patient and physician adherence to recommendations of community-based comprehensive geriatric assessment programmes. METHOD: I identified papers cited by an English language literature search of MEDLINE, Health Star and CINAHL databases from January 1980 to November 1999. This search was supplemented with literature identified from the reference sections of these publications. RESULTS: patient adherence rates ranged from 46 to 76%, which approximates to the rates for the consulting physician adherence (49-79%). I identified many characteristics of patient, treatment, care provider and clinical setting which influenced adherence. Understanding these factors has led to the development of adherence-enhancing strategies. However, without systematic evaluations it is difficult to evaluate the relative effectiveness of these interventions. CONCLUSION: further research which targets more representative samples and uses validated assessment tools and multiple data collection methods is needed to expand our knowledge of patterns and predictors of adherence and to evaluate the relative effectiveness of adherence-enhancing intervention strategies.

Aged↗

Impact of nutrition status on morbidity and mortality in a select population of geriatric rehabilitation patients.

To determine whether the level of protein-calorie undernutrition at presentation correlated with the subsequent risk of developing in-hospital complications independently of nonnutrition factors influencing outcomes, a prospective study was conducted of 110 consecutive admissions to a Geriatric Rehabilitation Unit (GRU) of a Veteran's Administration hospital. In total, 54 variables were evaluated as possible predictors of outcomes. The risk of developing at least one complication while on the GRU was studied by using multivariate techniques (discriminant function analysis) and was found to correlate with, in order of significance, functional status as admission, serum albumin concentration at admission, amount of weight lost in the year before admission, and the presence or absence of a renal or pulmonary disease. Nutrition variables also independently correlated with the risk of developing an infectious complication or a major life-threatening complication and dying within the hospital. These data indicate the importance of nutrition status in geriatric rehabilitation patients.

Aged↗

Effect of major trauma on plasma free amino acid concentrations in geriatric patients.

Age-associated decrease in lean body mass may lead to varied responses to severe trauma. Hypoaminoacidemia is generally common among trauma victims. We measured the plasma free amino acids in the early "flow," ie, catabolic, phase of injury in 9 elderly (aged 61-81 y) and 13 young (aged 20-38 y) traumatized patients. Postabsorptive control samples were obtained from 8 elderly and 10 young volunteers. The results were analyzed for age-related responses to major trauma. Older healthy control subjects showed a decrease in total amino acids, essential amino acids, proline, histidine, taurine, and cystine. The hypoaminoacidemia was less pronounced in geriatric trauma, mainly because of a larger decrease in nonessential amino acids in young trauma victims. Significant decreases in arginine and methionine and increases in ornithine and citrulline concentrations were seen in geriatric trauma. These results suggest a sluggish protein metabolic response to trauma in elderly individuals, which should be considered in their nutritional management.

Adult↗

Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index: a new index for evaluating at-risk elderly medical patients.

BACKGROUND: Patients at risk of malnutrition and related morbidity and mortality can be identified with the Nutritional Risk Index (NRI). However, this index remains limited for elderly patients because of difficulties in establishing their normal weight. OBJECTIVE: Therefore, we replaced the usual weight in this formula by ideal weight according to the Lorentz formula (WLo), creating a new index called the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI). DESIGN: First, a prospective study enrolled 181 hospitalized elderly patients. Nutritional status [albumin, prealbumin, and body mass index (BMI)] and GNRI were assessed. GNRI correlated with a severity score taking into account complications (bedsores or infections) and 6-mo mortality. Second, the GNRI was measured prospectively in 2474 patients admitted to a geriatric rehabilitation care unit over a 3-y period. RESULTS: The severity score correlated with albumin and GNRI but not with BMI or weight:WLo. Risk of mortality (odds ratio) and risk of complications were, respectively, 29 (95% CI: 5.2, 161.4) and 4.4 (95% CI: 1.3, 14.9) for major nutrition-related risk (GNRI: <82), 6.6 (95% CI: 1.3, 33.0), 4.9 (95% CI: 1.9, 12.5) for moderate nutrition-related risk (GNRI: 82 to <92), and 5.6 (95% CI: 1.2, 26.6) and 3.3 (95% CI: 1.4, 8.0) for a low nutrition-related risk (GNRI: 92 to < or =98). Accordingly, 12.2%, 31.4%, 29.4%, and 27.0% of the 2474 patients had major, moderate, low, and no nutrition-related risk, respectively. CONCLUSION: GNRI is a simple and accurate tool for predicting the risk of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized elderly patients and should be recorded systematically on admission.

Aged↗

Isradipine in the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension in geriatric patients.

A number of studies have shown the benefit of hypertensive treatment even though the most common forms of the disease are mild-to-moderate in severity. Considering the overall aging of the world's population, it is of particular interest to study hypertension and its treatment in geriatric patients. A short-term study of isradipine was conducted to assess its effectiveness and tolerability in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. The study was carried out by general practitioners and involved 3343 patients, aged > or = 18 years, with diastolic blood pressures (DBPs) ranging from 95 to 114 mm Hg. A 4-week wash-out and placebo run-in phase was followed by a 12-week active treatment period with isradipine at 1.25 or 2.5 mg/day, depending on the blood pressure response. Posttreatment results in a subgroup of 1092 patients (444 men and 648 women), aged > or = 60 years, showed decreases in systolic blood pressure (SBP) from 173.1 to 149.2 mm Hg (mean decrease, 20.9 mm Hg) and, in DBP, from 102.0 to 85.0 mm Hg (mean decrease, 16.9 mm Hg). The majority (84.6%) of these patients showed DBP reductions of > 10 mm Hg, and 82.3% achieved normalization (DBP < 90 mm Hg) at the end of treatment. The mean dosage was 1.74 +/- 0.69 mg twice daily, and 37% of patients doubled their initial 1.25 mg twice daily dosages. There were no significant changes in either heart rate or major metabolic parameters. Adverse events were reported by 3.1% of the patients, and 90% of both patients and physicians expressed satisfaction with the therapy. There were no differences between men and women with regard to adverse events or efficacy, nor were the results in patients > or = 60 years different from those in younger patients. Thus, isradipine was effective and well tolerated in these geriatric patients.

Adolescent↗

Comprehensive geriatric assessment predicts tolerance to chemotherapy and survival in elderly patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma: a GINECO study.

BACKGROUND: Data from prospective clinical trials are needed to better define standards of care in elderly patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma and to demonstrate the interest of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) in this fragile and heterogeneous population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From July 1998 to October 2000, 83 advanced ovarian carcinoma patients >70 years old received carboplatin AUC 5 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, on day 1 of six 28-day cycles. The clinical and biological geriatric covariates prospectively studied were: comorbidities, comedications, cognitive functions (Mini-Mental test), nutritional status and autonomy. RESULTS: Patient characteristics were: median age 76 years, serous histology (73%), FIGO stage III (75%), optimal initial surgery (21%) and performance status (PS) > or =2 (44%). Sixty patients (72%) received six chemotherapy cycles without severe toxicity (STox) or tumor progression. Multivariate analysis retained three factors as independent predictors of STox: symptoms of depression at baseline (P = 0.006), dependence (P = 0.048) and PS > or =2 (P = 0.026). Independent prognostic factors identified for overall survival (Cox model) were depression (P = 0.003), FIGO stage IV (P = 0.007) and more than six different comedications per day (P = 0.043). CONCLUSION: CGA could predict STox and overall survival of elderly advanced ovarian carcinoma patients.

Aged↗

Screening, detection and management of depression in elderly primary care attenders. I: The acceptability and performance of the 15 item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS15) and the development of short versions.

One-hundred and ninety-eight elderly subjects attending their general practitioners (GPs) were asked to complete the 15 item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS15). Analysable results were obtained from 194 (98%). Of these, 67 (34%) scored above the GDS15 cut-off (4/5) for significant depressive symptomatology. 87.6% found the questionnaire to be acceptable and only 3.6% found it very difficult or very stressful. The GDS15 had a high level of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.80). All the individual items of the GDS15 associated significantly (P < 0.01) with total score and 'caseness'. A single question "do you feel that your life is empty?" identified 84% of 'cases'. In an attempt to devise short scales to screen elderly primary care patients for depression, the data were subjected to logistic regression analysis. Ten (GDS10), four (GDS4) and on (GDS1) item versions were generated. Agreement between these short scales and the GDS15 in the original sample was 95, 91 and 79% respectively. Cronbach's alpha was 0.72 for the GDS10 and 0.55 for the GDS4. The short scales were then validated in an independent sample of 120 patients in whom both GDS data and the results of a detailed psychiatric interview (the Geriatric Mental Status Schedule, GMS) were available. The sensitivity and specificity of the GDS10 against GMS caseness were 87 and 77% (cut-off 3/4); those of the GDS4 were 89 and 65% (cut-off 0/1) and 61 and 81% (cut-off 1/2). Sensitivity and specificity for the GDS1 were 59 and 75%. It is concluded that these short scales may be useful in helping GPs and practice staff to identify elderly patients with significant depressive symptoms.

Aged↗

Recognition of depression in the elderly: a comparison of general practitioner opinions and the Geriatric Depression Scale.

As part of a larger study, 133 subjects aged 70 years and over were screened for depression using the Geriatric Depression Scale, a 30-item questionnaire, as the screening instrument. Cognitive status was assessed using the Mini Mental State Examination. The subject's own general practitioner was asked his/her opinion as to whether the subject was depressed. Poor agreement was found between depression as measured by the Geriatric Depression Scale and the general practitioner's assessment. Possible reasons for this include the difficulty of finding a satisfactory operational definition of depression for use by general practitioners, the problems of identifying depression in the elderly, the arbitrary definition provided by the scale and the confounding of depression, as measured by the scale, with cognitive status.

Aged↗

Potential drug interactions in an ambulatory geriatric population.

Drug interactions are a common cause of iatrogenic disease in geriatric patients. Computer programs now exist which allow one to analyse groups of drugs for potential interactions. In an audit of charts of 100 geriatric patients seen in the Family Practice Center at Barberton Citizens Hospital, a computer printout was obtained, listing all patients aged 60 years and over who were seen at the Center during 1989. Names were selected randomly from this list by the head nurse and their charts were obtained for review, generating information on patient identification number, age, sex, diagnoses, medications, and allergies. The medications were analysed using the Hansten Drug Interaction Knowledge Base Program, which identified 27 patients as being on a combination of medications which had one or more potential drug interactions. A total of 37 potential drug interactions were identified in this group of 27 patients. Relative risk ratios were determined using the computer program, 'Epi Info,' for sex (female versus male), age (greater than or equal to 75 vs. 60-75 years), number of diagnoses greater than or equal to 3 vs. 0-2), and number of medications (greater than or equal to 4 vs. 0-3). The five medications, or groups of medications, which were most likely to be involved in potential drug interactions were digoxin, beta-blockers, oestrogen, oral hypoglycaemic agents, and diuretics.

Aged↗

Current publications in gerontology and geriatrics.

THE SUBJECT categories are those in A Classified Bibliography of Gerontology and Geriatrics by Nathan W; Shock, published by Stanford University Press, Stanford, California (1951). Only major headings are used and the Roman numerals correspond to those given in the bibliography. Insofar as possible, references are classified according to organ systems. Thus, most of the material on Geriatrics will be found under the organ system involved in the disease. Cross references are indicated by numbers at the end of each section. When available, abstract references are given (B.A.--Biological Abstracts. P.A.--Psychological Abstracts, and P.I.-Population Index). Abbreviations for journals are those in A World List of Scientific Periodicals Published in the years 1900-1933; 2nd Edition. For journals not listed, abbreviations were devised to the general rules used in the above source. It is impossible to cover all journals and list all papers concerned with aging and the aged. Authors and publishers are requested to call attention to publications or to send reprints to the Gerontology Research Center, Baltimore City Hospitals, Baltimore, Maryland 21224.

Bibliographies as Topic↗

Current publications in Gerontology and Geriatrics.

The subject categories are those in A Classified Bibliography of Gerontology and Geriatrics by Nathan W. Shock, published by Stanford University Press, Stanford, California (1951). Only major headings are used and the Roman numerals correspond to those given in the bibliography. Insofar as possible, references are classified according to organ systems. Thus, most of the material on Geriatrics will be found under the organ system involved in the disease. Cross references are indicated by numbers at the end of each section. When available, abstract references are given (B.A.-Biological Abstracts. P.A.-Psychological Abstracts, and P.I.-Population Index). Abbreviations for journals are those in A World List of Scientific Periodicals Published in the years 1900-1933, 2nd Edition. For journals not listed, abbreviations were devised to the general rules used in the above source. It is impossible to cover all journals and list all papers concerned with aging and the aged. Authors and publishers are requested to call attention to publications or to send reprints to the Gerontology Research Center, Baltimore City Hospitals, Baltimore, Maryland 21224.

Bibliographies as Topic↗

Predictors of patient refusal to participate in ambulatory-based comprehensive geriatric assessment.

BACKGROUND: Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) in ambulatory settings can be effective only if patients who need this intervention are willing to participate in the evaluation and follow the indicated therapy. METHODS: To learn whether older persons' health beliefs and perceptions influence participation in ambulatory-based CGA, we studied subjects who failed a screening assessment offered through a community-based outreach program and were deemed appropriate for CGA. All subjects were interviewed in person following a structured sequence including questions from the RAND Current Health (CH) and Health Worry/Concern (HWC) scales, the Health Locus of Control Scale (HLC), and scales developed to measure health risks and perceived benefits of geriatric assessment. RESULTS: In univariate analysis, the following variables were associated with refusal to participate in CGA status at the p < .05 level: increased worry on HWC and higher scores on three new scales constructed to measure Global Health Risk (GHR), Perceived Global Health Benefits (PGHB), and Perceived Specific Health Benefits (PSHB). For GHR, higher scores indicate greater risk; for PGHB and PSHB, higher scores indicate greater perceived benefit. In multivariate analysis, only educational level, GHR, PGHB, and PSHB scores were independently predictive of refuser status. Correlations with other established health perceptions scales provided support that global health risk and perceived global and specific health benefits are unique constructs. Furthermore, high scores on these scales predicted participation in health improvement programs. CONCLUSIONS: Patients' beliefs about perceived risk and benefit can be measured and predict willingness to participate in ambulatory-based CGA.

Aged↗

Physician satisfaction with career choices in geriatrics.

In a national survey of fellows who had trained in geriatric medicine and psychiatry, the vast majority of former fellows expressed satisfaction with their current work. Satisfaction with a career choice in geriatrics was significantly greater among those physicians who had practices with large numbers of patients over 75, accepted Medicare assignment, spent their time as clinician-researchers, and had a medical school appointment. Physician job satisfaction may have important consequences, and attention to maximizing satisfaction is warranted.

Career Choice↗

Managing depressed and suicidal geriatric patients: differences among primary care physicians.

This study examined differences by specialty of primary care physicians in managing suicidal and depressed geriatric patients. A probability sample of 300 Illinois physicians drawn from the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile was surveyed. Significant differences were found between specialties in estimates of the prevalence of psychiatric disorders; use of assessment procedures, treatment approaches, and referrals; perceptions of obstacles to providing mental health care; and confidence in diagnosing and treating depression and suicidality. Meeting the mental health needs of the rapidly growing older population will require a greater emphasis on geriatric mental health and consistency across primary care specialties.

Adult↗

Goals in geriatric assessment: are we measuring the right outcomes?

Previous evaluative studies of outpatient geriatric assessment have focused on a limited set of outcomes related to functioning, health services utilization, and costs. The purpose of this study was to identify important goals for care as described by patients and family caregivers being cared for in this setting. Using a cross-section of 226 consecutive sets of patients and their primary family caregivers, physicians, and case managers, goals of care for individual patients were coded from open-ended interview responses. The most common categories of goals expressed by family caregivers were obtaining education and referrals (57.5%) and improving social and family relationships (53.0%). The process of establishing and meeting such goals should be explicitly included in the design of future evaluations of outpatient geriatric assessment.

Activities of Daily Living↗