Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “LABOR PRESENTATION”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,567 records · Page 87Linked to original sources
PubMed1988

Management of twin pregnancy: the vaginal route is still safe.

To investigate the effect of method of delivery on the outcome of twin pregnancies, we reviewed all deliveries at our institution over the 10 years from 1976 to 1985. Two hundred six pairs were delivered, with a mean gestational age of 34 weeks (range 20 to 43 weeks) and a mean weight of 2116 gm (range 220 to 3800 gm). The mean gestational age at diagnosis of the twin pregnancy was 23 weeks. Nineteen (4.6%) infants were stillborn, and 36 (8.7%) died in the neonatal period. Cesarean section was used to deliver both twins in 66 cases. The method of delivery for the remaining 142 cases was vaginal-vertex, 85 (61%), vaginal-breech, 40 (29%), cesarean section, 13 (9%), and version and extraction, 2 (1%). The four most common indications for cesarean section for both twins were previous cesarean section, breech presentation, abnormal labor, and fetal distress. The indications for the 13 cesarean sections after vaginal delivery of twin A were fetal distress, cord prolapse, high presenting part, and footling breech. The impact of the method of delivery was investigated by comparing outcome variables between twin pairs. No significant differences were noted for perinatal mortality, need for resuscitation, duration of newborn hospital stay, and trauma. There were significant differences in the 1- and 5-minute Apgar scores in the vaginal delivery group. These differences were clinically minor, tending toward mild acidemia, and were unaffected by route or method of delivery.

Delivery, Obstetric↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Intrapartum ultrasonographic depiction of fetal malpositioning and mild parietal bone compression in association with large lower segment uterine leiomyoma.

With normal flexion of the fetal head prior to and during early normal labor, the fetal biparietal diameter becomes engaged in (and subsequently traverses) the anterior posterior aspect of the pelvic inlet. Thus, the biparietal diameter (characterized sonographically by depiction of the falx cerebri, thalami, and cavum septum pellucidum) will be obtainable upon transverse suprapubic placement of the ultrasound transducer during the first stage of labor. Deflexion, or extension, of the fetal head may be demonstrated sonographically at the level of the cervical spine. Recently, during intrapartum ultrasonographic assessment of a nulliparous patient with a known, large, lower-segment, uterine fibroid, exhibiting poor progress of labor, the fetal biparietal diameter was documented upon midsagittal suprapubic placement of the transducer. In addition, mild compression of the distal parietal fetal bone was demonstrated and considered consistent with compression by the leiomyoma. Following abdominal delivery, due to fetal distress and arrest of descent, significant deflexion of the fetal head (not suspected by intrapartum cervical examinations) and mild parietal bone depression, consistent with the ultrasonographic examination, were noted.

Adult↗
PubMed1971

[Trial forceps].

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Birth Injuries↗
PubMed1977

Measuring the height of a cephalic presentation: an objective assessment of station.

The authors have previously described a method of objectively assessing the height of the presentation, an ultrasonic echograph measuring the distance from the head to the sacral tip. They have now obtained 453 measurements made before and during labor; norms are given according to the clinical evaluation of the station. The usefulness of the method is discussed. It may make the Bishop's score more precise, permit a more accurate check of trial of labor and help to recognize a low station correctly before an application of forceps.

Body Height↗
PubMed2005

Occurrence and clinical predictors of operative delivery for the vertex second twin after normal vaginal delivery of the first twin.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to estimate occurrence and explore clinical predictors of abdominal and vaginal operative delivery in vertex second twin after normal vaginal delivery of the first twin. METHODS: Data from a historical cohort study that was based on a twin registry in the United States (1995-1997) were used. RESULTS: Among 42,417 vertex second twins following normal vaginal delivery of the first twins, rates of abdominal and vaginal operative delivery were 6.3% and 8.3%, respectively. Cord prolapse, fetal distress, maternal complications, abnormal labor, and birth weight 25% larger than first twin were the most important predicators for operative deliveries. Fetal distress and cord prolapse had a stronger effect on abdominal than vaginal operative delivery. CONCLUSION: In general population, abdominal and vaginal operative delivery rates were 6.3% and 8.3%, respectively, in vertex second twin after normal vaginal delivery of the first twin. The most important predictors for operative delivery are cord prolapse and fetal distress.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Occiput posterior fetal head position increases the risk of anal sphincter injury in vacuum-assisted deliveries.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether an occiput posterior (OP) fetal head position increases the risk for anal sphincter injury when compared with an occiput anterior (OA) position in vacuum-assisted deliveries. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 393 vacuum-assisted singleton vaginal deliveries. Maternal demographics and obstetric and neonatal data were collected from an obstetric database and chart review. RESULTS: Within the OP group, 41.7% developed a third- or fourth-degree laceration compared with 22.0% in the OA group (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.4-4.7). In a logistic regression model that controlled for BMI, race, nulliparity, length of second stage, episiotomy, birth weight, head circumference, and fetal head position, OP position was 4.0 times (95% CI 1.7-9.6) more likely to be associated with an anal sphincter injury than OA position. CONCLUSION: Among vacuum deliveries, an OP head position confers an incrementally increased risk for anal sphincter injury over an OA position.

Anal Canal↗