Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Toothbrushing”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,549 records · Page 86Linked to original sources

Cleaning effectiveness of chewing sticks among Tanzanian schoolchildren.

The oral hygiene of habitual chewing stick and toothbrush users who participated in an oral health education (OHE) programme in schools was evaluated. The study comprised all chewing stick users (n = 45) in standard 4 in 8 randomly selected experimental schools and all chewing stick users (n = 17) in standard 4 in 4 randomly selected control schools. Each chewing stick user was randomly matched with a toothbrush user of the same sex, age and school. Their ages ranged from 10 to 13 years with a mean of 11.5 years. The children in standard 4 of the 8 experimental schools received OHE. Among many topics aiming to improve oral health of children, the practice of systematic brushing was taught. The children practised weekly brushing sessions in schools under the supervision of instructed teachers. At baseline, the chewing stick users exhibited statistically significant more plaque, but their gingival condition was comparable with their matched toothbrush counter-parts. After 3 months, the chewing stick and the toothbrush users in the experimental schools, had reduced their plaque and gingival bleeding scores significantly to the same extent, whereas no substantial changes in oral hygiene occurred in the control group. The findings show that schoolchildren who participated in a school programme that emphasizes effective toothbrushing were able to improve their oral hygiene regardless of whether they were habitual chewing stick or toothbrush users.

Adolescent↗

Efficacy of plaque removal of the Sonicare Elite versus the Sonicare Advance from hard-to-reach sites.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the Sonicare Elite with the Sonicare Advance in terms of the reduction in supragingival plaque in the posterior, hard-to-reach areas of the mouth. METHOD: This was a single-cohort, 6-week, two-treatment, single-blind, cross-over clinical trial that recruited 45 subjects. Plaque scores were recorded throughout the study using a modification of the Quigley and Hein plaque index (PI). All subjects had a minimum pre-brushing PI of 1.8 at screening following 24 h abstention from tooth cleaning. Subjects then used a Sonicare Advance powered toothbrush at home for 4 weeks for familiarisation purposes. At the next visit (2), subjects were given either the Sonicare Elite or the Sonicare Advance powered toothbrush for a further 2 weeks of home use. Twenty-four hours prior to visit 3, subjects abstained again from tooth cleaning. At visit 3, the PI was recorded pre- and post-tooth brushing and then all remaining "mature" plaque was removed professionally with a dental prophylaxis. After a further period of 24 h (to accumulate new plaque) without tooth brushing the subjects returned for visit 4 at which PIs were again recorded pre- and post-tooth brushing. The subjects were then given the second toothbrush in the cross-over sequence and attended for visits 5 and 6 at which the protocol for visits 3 and 4 was repeated. RESULTS: The Sonicare Elite powered toothbrush was more effective than the Sonicare Advance model in removing both mature and newly formed plaque. The magnitude of the differences between the toothbrushes for all posterior sites, interproximal and smooth surfaces, respectively, was 0.35 U (p<0.001), 0.39 U (p<0.001) and 0.32 U (p<0.001) of the modified Quigley and Hein PI. There was no evidence of a significant period effect comparing data from visits 5 and 6 against those from visits 3 and 4. There was, however, a significant visit effect with full-mouth (p<0.01), interproximal (p<0.001) and smooth surface (p<0.01) post-brushing plaque scores being significantly lower at visits 4 and 6 than at visits 3 and 5. CONCLUSION: The data support the observation that the Sonicare Elite toothbrush is more effective than the Sonicare Advance model in removing both newly formed and mature plaque from all posterior, interproximal and smooth tooth surfaces.

Adolescent↗

The effect of oral care feed-back devices on plaque removal and attitudes towards oral care.

OBJECTIVES: Two studies were carried out to investigate whether the effect of specific oral care feed-back devices would result in better plaque removal (Study 1) and lead to changes in attitudes and views relating to oral health (Study 2). The objective of the first study was to compare the ability of a toothbrush system consisting of a new toothbrush plus plaque disclosing tablet (SIGNAL Integral) to remove supra-gingival plaque to that of a marketed toothbrush (Oral B Cross Action) following a single unsupervised brushing. METHODS: Study 1 had a cross-over design and included 21 healthy adult volunteers. Subjects refrained from any form of oral hygiene for 24 hours prior to each test session. Plaque levels (Modified Quigley-Hein Plaque index) were assessed prior to and following each unsupervised brushing. When the new toothbrush was used, subjects self-disclosed their plaque with a disclosing tablet (erythrosine) immediately prior to brushing. At each occasion, brushing time (in sec) was also recorded. Study 2 had a two-cell, parallel design (test and control group) and lasted for five days. Healthy adult volunteers were enrolled. Subjects in the test group (n = 30) were given a fluoride toothpaste and four saliva test strips to use at home. The saliva test strip is designed to change colour in the pH range of 6.5 to 10, allowing the user to verify the effect of brushing. The control group (n = 29) received no saliva test strips. Subjects completed a questionnaire after 4 days of product use. RESULTS: In Study 1, significantly more plaque was removed (p < 0.05) and brushing time was increased by more than 20% when subjects used the new toothbrush together with the disclosing tablet compared to brushing with the marketed toothbrush. In Study 2, significant increases in motivation relating to oral hygiene were found in the test group who had been using the saliva test strip. CONCLUSION: The two studies have provided significant evidence that the provision of feed-back devices in an oral care context can lead to improved removal of plaque and increased motivation.

Adult↗

The effect of miswak and tooth brush filaments end-surface texture on enamel. A SEM pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare the abrasive effect of miswak and toothbrush filaments on enamel tooth surface. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten maxillary central incisors were obtained from Division of Maxillofacial Surgery, King Saud University, College of Dentistry. Twenty specimen were prepared, they were divided into 4 groups (1) Butler toothbrush; (2) Aquafresh toothbrush; (3) Miswak; (4) Control group. Miswak, Aquafresh 311 and Butler 311 tooth brush were used with light pressure in one direction motion for 60 seconds on enamel surface. The specimens were prepared for Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) examination. The middle filament from toothbrushes and miswak were also prepared for SEM. RESULTS: Showed that filaments end-surface texture play a major role in abrasive active activity and enamel tooth surface loss. CONCLUSION: The Butler 311 toothbrush and miswak showed lesser effect on enamel as compared to Aquafresh 311 toothbrush.

Dental Enamel↗

[Survey on oral hygiene performance among dental patients in the Taiwan area].

The purpose of this study was to determine the level of understanding and the importance placed on oral hygiene (i.e. frequency, time, tools, and attitude towards hygiene with respect to age, sex, and education or socioeconomic status) among dental patients in Taiwan. A total of 748 questionnaires (380 males and 368 females) was obtained, the chi square test was used to analyze the statistical significance of the results. The results showed a statistically significant correlation between oral hygiene habits and the following 1) onset of tooth-brushing as associated with sex and age; 2) frequency of toothbrushing as associated with age, education or socioeconomic status; 3) timing of brushing as associated with age and sex; 4) duration of toothbrushing and age; and, 5) flossing and age. Mean initial toothbrushing age was found to be 4.69 years of age and mean toothbrushing frequency was 2.42 times per day. Of the dental patients investigated, 47.5% did employ dual cleansings after meals and before bedtime. The average toothbrushing time was 1 minute and 53 seconds and brand preferences existed for toothpastes, rather than toothbrushes. It is suggested that dental health education on when to begin brushing a child's teeth and how to form good oral hygiene habits should be provided and reinforced along with periodic assessments of the tooth cleaning tools used for oral hygiene.

Age Factors↗

[Electric dental care in the child with multiple disability (author's transl)].

Considering the benefits of toothbrushing in dental health, the superiority of the electric toothbrush over conventional toothbrushes is described. The various special effects of electric toothbrushing for the cerebral palsied and the epileptic child are set forth, as are the procedures to be observed in initial use. In the treatment of dysarthria, the electric toothbrush may moreover be helpful for desensitizing the mouth area. Carers should be advised on how to apply the electric toothbrush as well as on the effects of so-called oral jet cleaners.

Child↗

Tongue scraping for treating halitosis.

BACKGROUND: Halitosis is used to describe any disagreeable odour of expired air regardless of its origin. Mouthwashes which disguise oral malodor are more socially acceptable and generally more popular than tongue scrapers. OBJECTIVES: To provide reliable evidence regarding the effectiveness of tongue scraping versus other interventions (including mouthwashes) to control halitosis. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the following databases: Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register (to 15th September 2005); the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 3 2005); MEDLINE 1966 to September Week 1 2005; EMBASE 1974 to September 2005 (searched September 19th 2005). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials comparing different methods of tongue cleaning to reduce mouth odour in adults with halitosis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Clinical heterogeneity between the two included trials precluded pooling of data, therefore a descriptive summary is presented. MAIN RESULTS: This review included two trials involving 40 participants. Both trials were methodologically sound but included no data for the primary outcomes specified in this review. Secondary outcomes expressed as volatile sulfur compound (VSC) levels were assessed by a portable sulfide monitor in both trials. One trial showed reductions of VSC levels of 42% with the tongue cleaner, 40% with the tongue scraper and 33% with the toothbrush. Reduced VSC levels persisted longer with the tongue cleaner than the toothbrush and could not be detected for more than 30 minutes after the intervention in any of the groups. Differences were assessed by the Friedman and Wilcoxon signed rank tests with the level of significance set at P < 0.05. The second trial, in which differences in totaled rank values between groups were compared by the Dunn method alpha = 0.01, showed a reduction of VSC levels compared with baseline measurements of 75% with the tongue scraper and 45% with the toothbrush. Adverse effects in one trial were nausea (60%) and trauma (10%) with the toothbrush and all participants receptive to using the tongue scraper. Based on the independent data from these two trials there was a statistically significant difference between the effectiveness of either the tongue cleaner or the tongue scraper in reducing VSC levels when compared with the toothbrush. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is weak and unreliable evidence to show that there is a small but statistically significant difference in reduction of VSC levels when tongue scrapers or cleaners rather than toothbrushes are used to reduce halitosis in adults. We found no high level evidence comparing mechanical with other forms of tongue cleaning.

Dental Devices, Home Care↗

Large-scale preparation of high-molecular weight DNA from buccal mucosa.

Four non-invasive methods of sampling DNA from buccal mucosa, simple rinses, scrubbing with cotton balls, scrubbing with toothbrushes and rinses after scrubbing with toothbrushes, were investigated. Scrubbing with toothbrushes yielded 5.79 +/- 5.56 microg of DNA rich in high-molecules, while less than one eighth the amount was recovered by scrubbing with cotton balls. Rinses after scrubbing with toothbrushes gave 50.0 +/- 46.0 microg of DNA and simple rinses 34.4 +/- 35.7 microg, although the DNA was considerably degraded. DNA specimens obtained from buccal cells were shown to be more or less in the process of degradation including apoptosis. For minisatellite analysis, only DNA prepared by scrubbing with toothbrushes could be used, while all specimens could be applied to PCR analyses. Since scrubbing with toothbrushes is painless and harmless, we recommend this method. Subsequent rinsing will yield a large amount of DNA suitable for many PCR analyses.

Journal Article↗

Subgingival access and artificial plaque removal by a sonic cleaning device.

A sonic subgingival cleaning device (soniPick Sonic Interdental Plaque Remover) has recently been marketed with three bristle tips varying in size lengths and bundle diameters. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of these bristle tips to remove subgingival artificial plaque deposits in a laboratory method used for toothbrushes. The laboratory method has been modified for testing the sonic device, to simulate the directions for using the product at home. The dimensions (length x bundle width) of three tips tested were: 0.007" x 0.040"; 0.007" x 0.062"; and 0.009" x 0.062". The tips used with the sonic device were placed on the tooth surface at a 20 degrees angle according to directions, and inserted 3 mm under simulated gingivae. The device was turned on and the tip was moved in a maximum 10 mm stroke for 15 seconds with the brushing machine. For control purposes, a flat, multi-tufted, ADA-accepted manual toothbrush (Oral-B P35) was also tested. The manual toothbrush was tested using the standard methods for evaluating toothbrushes, i.e., with the bristle tips placed at the gingival margin, then brushed at a 45 degrees angle at 250 g weight, using 15 mm strokes for 60 seconds. The depth of subgingival deposit removal was recorded as the maximum depth of the artificial plaque deposit removed from the pressure-sensitive paper under the simulated gingivae over anterior- or posterior-shaped teeth. In the assays conducted, the three bristle tips on the sonic device removed artificial plaque deposits under the simulated gingival at depths of 1.9-2.7 mm. The manual toothbrush had a mean subgingival cleaning depth of 0.6 mm. Differences between the three bristle tips used with the sonic device and the manual toothbrush were significant (p < 0.001 ANOVA). In this laboratory assay, all 3 bristle tips provided with the sonic cleaning device maintained access into and subsequent removal of artificial plaque from the subgingival space.

Analysis of Variance↗

Motivation for dental hygiene in adolescents.

The aim of this study was to investigate the relation between some 'lifestyle' factors and motivation for toothbrushing in young people. Data from a questionnaire survey of 7770 children aged 14-15 years were analysed to obtain information about their main reason for toothbrushing, their toothbrushing frequency, smoking behaviour and social efficacy. In those who brushed their teeth less frequently, toothbrushing was performed more for cosmetic reasons, that is, having teeth that look and feel good and breath that smells fresh, in contrast to the avoidance of toothache and false teeth, which are health reasons. The more socially advantaged individuals were more inclined to brush their teeth to avoid toothache, and less for the sake of good appearance, compared with the more disadvantaged. Motivation for toothbrushing varied significantly with smoking behaviour, committed smokers were more inclined to brush for cosmetic reasons whereas those who had never smoked were more concerned to avoid dental problems. Similarly, those who had a current friend of opposite sex, and in males, those expressing confidence when meeting members of the opposite sex, brushed more for cosmetic reasons. In conclusion, different people perform their dental hygiene for quite different reasons. These findings need to be taken into account when instructing patients in personal dental care and formulating dental health messages.

Adolescent↗

Wear and surface roughness of current prosthetic composites after toothbrush/dentifrice abrasion.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Surface changes of prosthetic composites caused by toothbrushing are known, although composite materials have been improved and are now widely used for various kinds of prosthetic restorations. PURPOSE: This study evaluated the influence of toothbrushing on abrasive wear and surface roughness of current prosthetic composites. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seven composite materials (Artglass, Axis, Cesead II, Conquest Sculpture, Estenia, Infis, and Targis) were assessed, and a machinable ceramic material (Cerec 2 Vitablocs) was used as a reference. Composite specimens polymerized with their proprietary curing units and sectioned ceramic specimens were stored in water for 14 days, and subsequently subjected to toothbrush-dentifrice abrasion. The amount of vertical loss and the surface roughness of each specimen after 20,000 strokes were determined with a profilometer. Average values of groups of 5 specimens were compared with ANOVA and Duncan new multiple range test. RESULT: Significantly (P < .05) less wear was observed with respect to the Targis (10.01 microm; SD = 0.53 microm) and Estenia (13.04 microm; 1.95 microm) materials than for the other composites assessed, whereas Artglass (34.08 microm; 3.66 microm) and Conquest Sculpture (31.78 microm; 4.67 microm) materials demonstrated the most wear. The least surface roughness was exhibited by Conquest Sculpture (Ra, 0.54 microm; 0.07 microm) material, and the greatest by Cesead II (1.10 microm; 0.13 microm). Ceramic material showed a more wear-resistant (4.54 microm; 0.79 microm) and smoother (0.26 microm; 0.02 microm) surface than any of the composite materials. CONCLUSION: Abrasion and surface roughness of the prosthetic composites caused by toothbrushing varied in accordance with the material. Type of prosthetic composite significantly influenced the surface condition after toothbrushing.

Analysis of Variance↗

Ingestion of fluoride from dentifrices by children aged 12 to 24 months.

The increase of dental fluorosis is largely imputable to the ingestion of dietary fluoride supplements and fluoride toothpastes. However, the toothbrushing habits of very young children is poorly documented. The purpose of this pilot study was to determine the toothbrushing habits of 12- to 24-month-old children and to estimate the quantity of fluoride ingested during toothbrushing. Fifty-nine parents completed a questionnaire regarding the toothcleaning habits of their children. When a dentifrice was used, a dental hygienist scheduled a meeting with the parents in order to observe and measure the amount of toothpaste used. Of the 36 parents who cleaned the teeth of their children, 69% used a toothpaste. Furthermore 20% of the children ingested more than 0.25 mg of fluoride per day by toothbrushing alone. Therefore the practice of toothbrushing and the use of fluoridated dentifrices are widespread among 12- to 24-month old children, and the amount of fluoride ingested from toothpaste could constitute a substantial proportion of the total daily intake of fluoride. Several measures are suggested to enhance the safe use of fluoride dentifrices.

Child, Preschool↗

Examining the prevalence and characteristics of abfractionlike cervical lesions in a population of U.S. veterans.

BACKGROUND: Abfraction is believed to be caused by biomechanical loading forces. It may be due to flexure and ultimate fatigue of tooth tissues that occur away from the point of occlusal loading. Other possible causes of cervical lesions include toothbrush abrasion and erosion. The purpose of this study was to investigate the characteristics and prevalence of abfraction-like lesions in a population of U.S. veterans. METHODS: The authors evaluated 103 teeth with noncarious cervical lesions in 32 subjects and characterized them based on the surface on which the lesion was located, history of toothbrush abrasion, size of the lesion, presence of plaque, surface texture, and presence and size of occlusal wear facets. RESULTS: Clinical examination revealed that adjacent control teeth had a significantly lower percentage of surfaces with plaque than did teeth with cervical lesions. Control teeth also had significantly less gingival recession than did affected teeth. Seventy-five percent of subjects reported a history of using a firm toothbrush, and 78.1 percent reported using a brushing technique that is known to cause toothbrush abrasion in the affected area. Affected teeth had neither significantly different occlusal wear facets nor occlusal contacts than control teeth. No significant correlations were found between cervical lesion dimensions and facet area. CONCLUSIONS: Toothbrush abrasion is strongly suspected as contributing to the formation of the majority of wedge-shaped lesions in this group of subjects. A small subset of lesions is thought to have resulted from some other phenomenon. Although the presence or contribution of occlusal stresses in the direct formation of these lesions could not be measured directly, the possibility of abfraction could not be eliminated. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Because the existence of abfraction could not be ruled out in about 15 percent of the cases, teeth with noncarious, wedge-shaped lesions warrant careful occlusal evaluation, with the possible need for occlusal adjustment or bitesplint therapy to treat bruxism.

Adult↗

Clinical efficacy of flossing versus use of antimicrobial rinses.

BACKGROUND: Dental floss is only used by a small part of the population on a daily basis. Therefore, an easy, applicable alternative is needed. This alternative could be a mouthrinse with antimicrobial activity for daily use. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of two mouthrinses in reducing interdental plaque and gingivitis compared to dental floss. METHODS: A total of 156 healthy volunteers were randomly assigned to the following groups: 1) toothbrushing and rinsing (0.06% chlorhexidine and 0.025% fluoride); 2) toothbrushing and rinsing (0.1% cetylpyridiniumchloride and 0.025% fluoride); 3) toothbrushing and flossing; and 4) toothbrushing only (N = 39 subjects in each group). At baseline, the modified proximal plaque index (MPPI) and papillary bleeding index (PBI) were recorded. Thereafter, subjects had to brush in the usual manner during 8 weeks. Additionally, test groups had to rinse once a day (groups 1 and 2: 30 seconds) or to floss (group 3). Eight weeks after baseline, indices were recorded again and improvements were calculated. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Bonferroni test served for statistical analysis. RESULTS: After 8 weeks, reductions for all indices were found in all groups (P <0.05). With respect to the MPPI, mouthrinse groups performed better than the control and floss groups: 1) 0.73; 2) 0.82; 3) 0.40; and 4) 0.32 (P <0.05). The PBI showed no statistically significant difference between groups: 1) 0.46; 2); 0.50; 3); 0.42; and 4) 0.37. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that, in combination with toothbrushing, daily use of the tested mouthrinses may result in a higher interproximal plaque reduction than daily flossing.

Adult↗

Abrasive effect of brushing on ormocers following acid conditioning.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of toothbrushing on the surface roughness and microhardness of Admira and Definite following acid conditioning. Half of the samples were either used as controls or brushed for 10 minutes using an electric toothbrush with slurry. The remaining specimens were stored in orthophosphoric acid with a pH of 1.9 for 24 hours and then half were brushed. The surface roughness of Admira and Definite was not significantly affected by storage under acidic conditions. However, the specimens of both materials in the control groups and the ones tested after acidic storage were found to be significantly smoother than the specimens subjected to toothbrushing alone and brushing following acid conditioning. For both materials, significantly higher values of microhardness were obtained after toothbrushing following acid conditioning than toothbrushing alone. Therefore, brushing following acid conditioning significantly affects the surfaces of the ormocers.

Analysis of Variance↗

[The effects of an essential oil mouthrinse on oral health in the community indwelling elderly].

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of an essential oil mouthrinse with gingival massage on oral health in community indwelling elderly. METHOD: The subjects were composed of 61 healthy elderly at a Senior Welfare Center in J city. Thirty subjects in the experimental group were given toothbrushing education ongingival massage toothbrushing with an essential oil mouthrinse for 2 weeks(4 times per day, 3 minutes per session). The 31 subjects in the control group were given toothbrushing education ongingival massage toothbrushing. The effects of the treatment were measured by salivary pH, salivary IgA level, halitosis, oral subjective symptoms, and oral self care behavior scores before, right after and 2 weeks after the experiment. RESULTS: Salivary pH was significantly increased(p=0.018) in the experimental group. Salivary IgA levels were not significantly different between the experimental and control groups; however, IgA levels of the experimental group were significantly increased(p=0.006) after time had passed. Halitosis was significantly decreased(p=0.002) in the experimental group. Oral subjective symptom scores were significantly decreased(p=0.000) and oral self care behavior scores were significantly increased(p=0.000) in the experimental group. CONCLUSION: Regular gingival massage toothbrushing with an essential oil mouthrinse could be an effective oral health nursing intervention for the elderly.

Aged↗

Effect of dentin desensitizers and dentin bonding agents on dentin permeability.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of dentin desensitizing agents (oxalates and glutaraldehyde) and dentin bonding agents, with and without resin-based composite (RBC) on dentin permeability and morphology of the dentin surface. The influence of saliva and toothbrushing on these agents was also evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radicular dentin discs +/-1 mm thick were obtained from extracted human teeth. The thickness of the discs was standardized by grinding them with 600 grit silicon carbide powder. Both pulpal and periodontal surfaces of the discs were treated with 6% citric acid for 2 min prior to the baseline measurement of dentin permeability. Permeability was measured for the discs, using a split-chamber apparatus, at four different time points: at baseline, after treatment with each desensitizing modality, after 24 hrs of saliva immersion and after simulated toothbrushing equivalent to 3 weeks of normal brushing. The treatment modalities were: Sensodyne Dentin Desensitizer, Gluma Dentin Desensitizer, All-Bond DS (primers without etching), Etch+Primers (All-Bond 2 system), Etch+Primers+Adhesive and Etch+Primers+Adhesive+RBC (AElite Flo). Radicular dentin discs were prepared separately for scanning electron microscopy (SEM). One group was left untreated as the control group. Discs in the other groups were treated with the modalities listed above. One disc from each group was viewed under the SEM after treatment with the desensitizing modality. The second disc in each group was viewed after 24 hrs of saliva immersion following desensitizing treatment and the third disc after 3 weeks of simulated toothbrushing following desensitizing treatment and saliva immersion. RESULTS: The greatest reduction in permeability was caused by All-Bond DS followed by Sensodyne Dentin Desensitizer and Etch+Primers+Adhesive+RBC. Gluma Dentin Desensitizer, Etch+Primers, and Etch+Primers+Adhesive did not reduce permeability by a significant amount. Saliva immersion increased permeability significantly only for the Gluma and Etch+Primers+Adhesive groups. There was a trend towards increase in permeability after toothbrushing; however, this increase was not statistically significant for any group (P > 0.05). Thus, placement of primers without etching (All-Bond DS) reduced permeability more than any other treatment modality. These data indicate that etching a sensitive dentin area may be appropriate only if RBC is to be placed in the area. Exposure to saliva and toothbrushing countered the decrease in permeability caused by dedicated desensitizers and dentin bonding agents. The SEM micrographs revealed that in most cases, form corroborated function and the morphology of the dentin surface corresponded to the dentin permeability values.

Acid Etching, Dental↗

Assessing the surface roughness of a posterior resin composite: effect of surface sealing.

This study assessed the in vitro influence of surface sealing on the surface roughness of a posterior resin composite before and after toothbrushing. Thirty specimens (13 mm diameter x 1 mm high) were fabricated from Filtek-P60 resin composite and randomly assigned to three groups (n = 10): a non-sealed control and two groups sealed with one of the tested materials-a surface-penetrating sealant (Protect-it!-PI) and a one bottle adhesive system (Single Bond-SB). The samples were subjected to a surface roughness reading to determine the initial roughness, then submitted to simulated toothbrushing with 35,600 cycles for 100 minutes. Specimens were then cleaned and a post-abrasion surface roughness reading accomplished. Means (microm), recorded before (B) and after (A) toothbrushing, and standard deviations were: Control--(B): 0.032 (+/- 0.005), (A): 0.054 (+/- 0.005); PI-(B): 0.034 (+/- 0.005), (A): 0.060 (+/- 0.034); SB (B): 0.031 (+/- 0.004), (A): 0.047 (+/- 0.007). Data were tabulated and submitted to two-way ANOVA. No statistically significant difference was observed when the control and experimental groups were compared. However, a significant difference (p < 0.05) was found between the measurements performed before and after toothbrushing. Based on these results, it may be concluded that using either a surface penetrating sealant or a one bottle adhesive system did not provide the optimization of superficial integrity. The use of a dentifrice and toothbrush resulted in significant alterations to the surface smoothness of the resin composite.

Analysis of Variance↗