Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Neural Tube Defects”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,549 records · Page 86Linked to original sources

Postulated mechanisms underlying the development of neural tube defects. Insights from in vitro and in vivo studies.

In recent years, use of animal models has resulted in acquisition of a significant amount of new information regarding normal and abnormal neural tube development. Studies of mutant and of teratogen-exposed mice are complementary, with each providing insights that promise to advance our understanding of the other. Analysis of teratogen-exposed embryos is best suited for identifying susceptible developmental stages and vulnerable populations. Advances in molecular genetics, with the ability to identify gene products, their cell/tissue location, and, potentially, to understand their function, will make naturally occurring as well as man-made mutants invaluable for understanding the heterogeneous mechanisms that underly NTDs.

Animals↗

Mouse mutants with neural tube closure defects and their role in understanding human neural tube defects.

BACKGROUND: The number of mouse mutants and strains with neural tube closure defects (NTDs) now exceeds 190, including 155 involving known genes, 33 with unidentified genes, and eight "multifactorial" strains. METHODS: The emerging patterns of mouse NTDs are considered in relation to the unknown genetics of the common human NTDs, anencephaly, and spina bifida aperta. RESULTS: Of the 150 mouse mutants that survive past midgestation, 20% have risk of either exencephaly and spina bifida aperta or both, parallel to the majority of human NTDs, whereas 70% have only exencephaly, 5% have only spina bifida, and 5% have craniorachischisis. The primary defect in most mouse NTDs is failure of neural fold elevation. Most null mutations (>90%) produce syndromes of multiple affected structures with high penetrance in homozygotes, whereas the "multifactorial" strains and several null-mutant heterozygotes and mutants with partial gene function (hypomorphs) have low-penetrance nonsyndromic NTDs, like the majority of human NTDs. The normal functions of the mutated genes are diverse, with clusters in pathways of actin function, apoptosis, and chromatin methylation and structure. The female excess observed in human anencephaly is found in all mouse exencephaly mutants for which gender has been studied. Maternal agents, including folate, methionine, inositol, or alternative commercial diets, have specific preventative effects in eight mutants and strains. CONCLUSIONS: If the human homologs of the mouse NTD mutants contribute to risk of common human NTDs, it seems likely to be in multifactorial combinations of hypomorphs and low-penetrance heterozygotes, as exemplified by mouse digenic mutants and the oligogenic SELH/Bc strain.

Actins↗