Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Disopyramide”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,549 records · Page 86Linked to original sources

Pharmacokinetic drug interactions of macrolides.

The macrolide antibiotics include natural members, prodrugs and semisynthetic derivatives. These drugs are indicated in a variety of infections and are often combined with other drug therapies, thus creating the potential for pharmacokinetic interactions. Macrolides can both inhibit drug metabolism in the liver by complex formation and inactivation of microsomal drug oxidising enzymes and also interfere with microorganisms of the enteric flora through their antibiotic effects. Over the past 20 years, a number of reports have incriminated macrolides as a potential source of clinically severe drug interactions. However, differences have been found between the various macrolides in this regard and not all macrolides are responsible for drug interactions. With the recent advent of many semisynthetic macrolide antibiotics it is now evident that they may be classified into 3 different groups in causing drug interactions. The first group (e.g. troleandomycin, erythromycins) are those prone to forming nitrosoalkanes and the consequent formation of inactive cytochrome P450-metabolite complexes. The second group (e.g. josamycin, flurithromycin, roxithromycin, clarithromycin, miocamycin and midecamycin) form complexes to a lesser extent and rarely produce drug interactions. The last group (e.g. spiramycin, rokitamycin, dirithromycin and azithromycin) do not inactivate cytochrome P450 and are unable to modify the pharmacokinetics of other compounds. It appears that 2 structural factors are important for a macrolide antibiotic to lead to the induction of cytochrome P450 and the formation in vivo or in vitro of an inhibitory cytochrome P450-iron-nitrosoalkane metabolite complex: the presence in the macrolide molecules of a non-hindered readily accessible N-dimethylamino group and the hydrophobic character of the drug. Troleandomycin ranks first as a potent inhibitor of microsomal liver enzymes, causing a significant decrease of the metabolism of methylprednisolone, theophylline, carbamazepine, phenazone (antipyrine) and triazolam. Troleandomycin can cause ergotism in patients receiving ergot alkaloids and cholestatic jaundice in those taking oral contraceptives. Erythromycin and its different prodrugs appear to be less potent inhibitors of drug metabolism. Case reports and controlled studies have, however, shown that erythromycins may interact with theophylline, carbamazepine, methylprednisolone, warfarin, cyclosporin, triazolam, midazolam, alfentanil, disopyramide and bromocriptine, decreasing drug clearance. The bioavailability of digoxin appears also to be increased by erythromycin in patients excreting high amounts of reduced digoxin metabolites, probably due to destruction of enteric flora responsible for the formation of these compounds. These incriminated macrolide antibiotics should not be administered concomitantly with other drugs known to be affected metabolically by them, or at the very least, combined administration should be carried out only with careful patient monitoring.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

Long term efficacy of class I antiarrhythmic agents and amiodarone in patients with malignant ventricular arrhythmias.

The long term efficacy of class I antiarrhythmic drugs and of amiodarone was investigated in 34 patients with severe organic heart disease accompanied by frequent complex ventricular arrhythmias. All patients had undergone cardiac catheterisation which included coronary angiography, and each patient underwent a short and a long term study phase. During the short term study 6 class I antiarrhythmic agents were administered orally in a randomised, single-blind fashion. The drugs investigated were disopyramide, flecainide, mexiletine, prajmalium, propafenon and tocainide. The response was judged to be effective when there was a 90% reduction of couplets and a 100% reduction of salvos. For long term treatment the patient was given one of the agents found to be effective in the short term testing. Holter monitoring was performed after 1 week, and 1, 3 and 6 months. If the drug administered initially was later found to be ineffective, the patient was given another effective class I agent. If during the short term study or the follow-up phase there was no positive response to any class I agent, the patient was given amiodarone. In 78% of the patients, one or more of the class I agents administered short term was effective. The percentage of effectively treated patients after 1 week was 56%, and was 28, 14, and 9% after 1, 3, and 6 months' treatment, respectively. In amiodarone-treated patients there was an effective response rate of 40% after 10 days, 50% after 1 month and 70% after 3 and 6 months.

Amiodarone↗

Amiodarone treatment in patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Amiodarone has been used in the therapy of supraventricular and ventricular tachycardia, and has often been categorised as a class III rather than a class I agent. However, in patients with ventricular arrhythmias, amiodarone 800mg daily for 14 days prolonged the right ventricular effective refractory period by a mean of 18.8 msec (p less than 0.05), and HV interval by a mean of 5.2 msec (p less than 0.05), these changes being similar to those noted with drugs such as quinidine, procainamide, disopyramide and encainide. The antiarrhythmic efficacy of amiodarone was evaluated in 196 patients with recurrent sustained ventricular tachycardia, recurrent ventricular fibrillation or recurrent nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. Coronary artery disease, dilated (congestive) cardiomyopathy, or other forms of heart disease were present in most patients. After 1 month of therapy, 177 patients continued to receive amiodarone and, during the remainder of the follow-up period, 139 patients had no recurrence of spontaneous ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation. Sudden cardiac death occurred in 15 patients after a mean treatment period of 10.4 months. Overall, amiodarone was an effective form of therapy in patients with ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation.

Adolescent↗

Does treatment influence the natural history of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is a cardiac disorder of unknown aetiology which is characterised by hypertrophy of a non-dilated left ventricle. The course of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy may be relatively benign, but the risk of sudden death due to ventricular arrhythmias is an important clinical problem. Those patients at greatest risk of sudden death appear to be those with the combination of diagnosis in childhood, a family history of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and sudden death, and syncopal episodes. The treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy-associated ventricular tachycardia with 'conventional' antiarrhythmic agents (disopyramide, quinidine, mexiletine) has seldom been successful. However, treatment of this arrhythmia with amiodarone in well-matched but non-parallel groups of patients has resulted in suppression of arrhythmia and improved survival compared with that seen with 'conventional' antiarrhythmic agents.

Amiodarone↗

Flecainide. A preliminary review of its pharmacodynamic properties and therapeutic efficacy.

Flecainide is a Class I antiarrhythmic drug of the local anaesthetic type. It can be given either intravenously or orally and its pharmacokinetic properties allow relatively long (12 hours) dosing intervals with oral administration. In several open and a few controlled therapeutic trials, orally administered flecainide has brought about a greater than 90% suppression of ventricular ectopic beats in about 80% of patients. A similar percentage of patients (83%) experienced at least an 80% suppression of their ventricular tachycardia in these trials. A slightly greater response rate was reported with intravenous infusion of flecainide. Initial results in arrhythmias complicating the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome have been favourable. Comparative trials are few in number but flecainide has proved to be more effective than quinidine, and possibly more effective than disopyramide, mexiletine, tocainide and propafenone, in suppressing ventricular ectopic activity. The most commonly reported extracardiac adverse effects have been dizziness and visual disturbances. Proarrhythmic effects have been reported in 7 to 8% of patients, with a higher incidence in patients with serious ventricular tachycardia and reduced myocardial function. The moderate negative inotropic effects of flecainide can become clinically significant in patients with impaired ventricular function. Thus flecainide, with its convenient dose schedule and apparently low incidence of serious side effects, would appear to be a useful addition to the antiarrhythmic agents available. Further studies are needed though, to confirm its long term tolerability when used prophylactically.

Animals↗

Propafenone. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in the treatment of arrhythmias.

Propafenone is a Class I antiarrhythmic agent with weak beta-adrenoceptor antagonist activity which can be given both intravenously and orally. Dosage must be individualised because of dose-dependent pharmacokinetics, a wide range of clinically effective plasma concentrations (64 to 3271 micrograms/L) after comparable doses, the presence of an active metabolite (5-hydroxy-propafenone) and genetically determined metabolic oxidation. In non-comparative studies propafenone 450 and 900 mg/day orally significantly suppressed premature ventricular complexes and couplets in 96% and 75% of patients, respectively, and abolished ventricular tachycardia in 75% of patients. Efficacy was confirmed in placebo-controlled studies in which propafenone 300 to 900mg daily suppressed premature ventricular complexes (greater than 80%) in 77% of patients; 87% of patients had significant reductions in couplets and abolition of ventricular tachycardia. In patients with ventricular arrhythmias refractory to other antiarrhythmic agents, propafenone 450 to 1200 mg/day suppressed arrhythmias in 63% of patients (in long term therapy 66%). Electrically induced arrhythmias were prevented by intravenously administered propafenone in 12 to 23% of patients. However, long term oral therapy was effective in 77% of patients selected using programmed electrical stimulation. Propafenone was also effective in suppressing atrial and AV nodal/junctional re-entrant tachycardias and Wolff-Parkinson-White tachycardias involving accessory pathways. A limited number of comparisons with other antiarrhythmic drugs indicate that the antiarrhythmic efficacy of propafenone is superior or similar to that of quinidine, disopyramide and tocainide, and comparable to that of lignocaine (lidocaine), flecainide and metoprolol against ventricular arrhythmias and a smaller number of atrial arrhythmias. Cardiovascular side effects indicate a proarrhythmic effect similar to that with other Class I drugs, occasional precipitation of congestive heart failure and conduction abnormalities; the latter two occur more often in patients with underlying ventricular dysfunction. Non-cardiovascular side effects (neurological, gastrointestinal) are well tolerated and generally resolve with continued therapy or dosage reduction. Thus, propafenone is an effective antiarrhythmic agent, and is a useful addition to currently available drugs, although further studies will be required to determine clearly its place in therapy compared with more established antiarrhythmic drugs.

Arrhythmias, Cardiac↗

New antiarrhythmic drugs.

While controversy still exists as to the precise indications for the treatment of all forms of ventricular arrhythmia, advances in the number and, more importantly, type of antiarrhythmic drugs can provide the clinician with a rational basis for selecting antiarrhythmic drug therapy. A host of new agents with different pharmacokinetic and electrophysiological actions are now available, and can be compared or contrasted to conventional antiarrhythmic agents such as quinidine, procainamide, disopyramide, lignocaine (lidocaine) and bretylium. This review summarises the electrophysiological, haemodynamic, pharmacokinetic, and efficacy and safety data of mexiletine, tocainide, flecainide, encainide, propafenone, amiodarone, sotalol, pirmenol, cibenzoline (cifenline) and ethmozine (moracizine, moricizine), and aims to provide a basis on which clinicians can compare and contrast these agents and form an algorithm for selection of antiarrhythmic drug therapy in the treatment of patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Anti-Arrhythmia Agents↗

Moricizine. A review of its pharmacological properties, and therapeutic efficacy in cardiac arrhythmias.

Moricizine (moracizine, ethmozine) is an orally active phenothiazine derivative with direct myocardial Class I antiarrhythmic activity and minimal CNS effects. Placebo-controlled studies have confirmed its efficacy in suppressing nonmalignant ventricular arrhythmias (premature ventricular complexes, couplets and runs of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia), including those refractory to previous antiarrhythmic therapy. Preliminary findings have indicated that moricizine is also effective in suppressing atrial ectopic activity, atrioventricular nodal re-entry tachycardia and Wolff-Parkinson-White tachycardias involving accessory pathways. As with other oral antiarrhythmics, malignant ventricular arrhythmias (sustained ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation) have been shown, both on noninvasive monitoring and programmed electrical stimulation, to be less susceptible to suppression by moricizine than nonmalignant ventricular arrhythmias. The therapeutic potential of moricizine is enhanced by its relatively low incidence of extra-cardiac adverse effects (predominantly gastrointestinal and neurological) and its lack of significant cardiodepressant activity in patients with normal or mildly to moderality depressed left ventricular function. Moricizine has proved to be more effective than disopyramide and propranolol in suppressing ventricular ectopic activity, of comparable efficacy to quinidine, but less effective than encainide and flecainide. The drug appears to be particularly suited to the suppression of ventricular ectopy in patients with preexisting left ventricular dysfunction. Further studies are required to confirm its long term efficacy and effects on mortality when used prophylactically in patients at increased risk of sudden cardiac death.

Animals↗

Mexiletine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in the treatment of arrhythmias.

As a member of the class Ib antiarrhythmic drugs mexiletine's primary mechanism of action is blocking fast sodium channels, reducing the phase 0 maximal upstroke velocity of the action potential. It increases the ratio of effective refractory period to action potential duration, but has little effect on conductivity. Unlike quinidine it does not prolong QRS and QT (QTc) intervals. In the dosage range 600 to 900 mg daily mexiletine effectively suppresses premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) in 25% to 79% of patients, with or without underlying cardiac disease. In comparative studies the response rate was comparable to that with quinidine or disopyramide. However, the use of antiarrhythmic therapy in patients with asymptomatic arrhythmias is controversial. More importantly, mexiletine abolishes spontaneous or inducible ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation in the short term in 20% to 50% of patients with refractory arrhythmias. Arrhythmia suppression is maintained in 57% to over 80% of these early therapeutic successes in the long term, with mexiletine alone or in combination with another antiarrhythmic drug. As with other antiarrhythmic drugs, there is no substantial evidence that administration of mexiletine after acute myocardial infarction improves long term prognosis. Although the incidence of adverse effects associated with mexiletine is high, the majority are minor gastrointestinal or neurological effects which can be adequately controlled through dosage adjustment. Furthermore, mexiletine has minimal effects on haemodynamic variables, or on cardiac function in patients with or without pre-existing deterioration of left ventricular function, and it appears to have a low proarrhythmic potential. Thus, while the therapeutic efficacy of mexiletine for the prevention or suppression of symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias may be no greater than that of other antiarrhythmic drugs, and less than that of some (e.g. amiodarone), it is effective in a significant proportion of patients refractory to other treatments and can be administered without causing adverse haemodynamic effects to patients with complicating factors such as acute myocardial infarction or congestive heart failure.

Animals↗

Use of beta-blockers in atrial fibrillation.

Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia in the general population and is frequently associated with organic heart disease. beta-adrenoceptor antagonists (b-blockers) are very effective in preventing atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery. It has been shown recently that the beta-blocker metoprolol controlled release/extended release (CR/XL) is also effective in maintaining sinus rhythm after conversion of atrial fibrillation. There is concern that class I antiarrhythmic drugs, such as quinidine, disopyramide, and flecainide in particular, may increase mortality. The risk of proarrhythmia associated with beta-blocker treatment is very low. Therefore b-blockers, such as metoprolol CR/XL, may be the first line of treatment to maintain sinus rhythm, especially after myocardial infarction and in patients with chronic heart failure and in those with arterial hypertension. In patients with persistent atrial fibrillation, AV-nodal conduction-slowing drugs, such as calcium channel antagonists and beta-blockers are used to control the ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation. Several studies clearly show that beta-blockers alone, or in combination with digoxin are very effective in controlling the ventricular rate at rest and during exercise. beta-blockers are effective in maintaining sinus rhythm and controlling the ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation. Given these effects and their favorable effects on mortality, beta-blockers should be considered as first-line agents in the management of patients with atrial fibrillation.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

Interactions between grapefruit juice and cardiovascular drugs.

Grapefruit juice can alter oral drug pharmacokinetics by different mechanisms. Irreversible inactivation of intestinal cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 is produced by commercial grapefruit juice given as a single normal amount (e.g. 200-300 mL) or by whole fresh fruit segments. As a result, presystemic metabolism is reduced and oral drug bioavailability increased. Enhanced oral drug bioavailability can occur 24 hours after juice consumption. Inhibition of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is a possible mechanism that increases oral drug bioavailability by reducing intestinal and/or hepatic efflux transport. Recently, inhibition of organic anion transporting polypeptides by grapefruit juice was observed in vitro; intestinal uptake transport appeared decreased as oral drug bioavailability was reduced. Numerous medications used in the prevention or treatment of coronary artery disease and its complications have been observed or are predicted to interact with grapefruit juice. Such interactions may increase the risk of rhabdomyolysis when dyslipidemia is treated with the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors atorvastatin, lovastatin, or simvastatin. Potential alternative agents are pravastatin, fluvastatin, or rosuvastatin. Such interactions might also cause excessive vasodilatation when hypertension is managed with the dihydropyridines felodipine, nicardipine, nifedipine, nisoldipine, or nitrendipine. An alternative agent could be amlodipine. In contrast, the therapeutic effect of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist losartan may be reduced by grapefruit juice. Grapefruit juice interacting with the antidiabetic agent repaglinide may cause hypoglycemia, and interaction with the appetite suppressant sibutramine may cause elevated BP and HR. In angina pectoris, administration of grapefruit juice could result in atrioventricular conduction disorders with verapamil or attenuated antiplatelet activity with clopidrogel. Grapefruit juice may enhance drug toxicity for antiarrhythmic agents such as amiodarone, quinidine, disopyramide, or propafenone, and for the congestive heart failure drug, carvediol. Some drugs for the treatment of peripheral or central vascular disease also have the potential to interact with grapefruit juice. Interaction with sildenafil, tadalafil, or vardenafil for erectile dysfunction, may cause serious systemic vasodilatation especially when combined with a nitrate. Interaction between ergotamine for migraine and grapefruit juice may cause gangrene or stroke. In stroke, interaction with nimodipine may cause systemic hypotension. If a drug has low inherent oral bioavailability from presystemic metabolism by CYP3A4 or efflux transport by P-gp and the potential to produce serious overdose toxicity, avoidance of grapefruit juice entirely during pharmacotherapy appears mandatory. Although altered drug response is variable among individuals, the outcome is difficult to predict and avoiding the combination will guarantee toxicity is prevented. The elderly are at particular risk, as they are often prescribed medications and frequently consume grapefruit juice.

Beverages↗

Theoretical possibilities for the development of novel antiarrhythmic drugs.

One possible mechanism of action of the available K-channel blocking agents used to treat arrhythmias is to selectively inhibit the HERG plus MIRP channels, which carry the rapid delayed rectifier outward potassium current (I(Kr)). These antiarrhythmics, like sotalol, dofetilide and ibutilide, have been classified as Class III antiarrhythmics. However, in addition to their beneficial effect, they substantially lengthen ventricular repolarization in a reverse-rate dependent manner. This latter effect, in certain situations, can result in life-threatening polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (torsades de pointes). Selective blockers (chromanol 293B, HMR-1556, L-735,821) of the KvLQT1 plus minK channel, which carriy the slow delayed rectifier potassium current (I(Ks)), were also considered to treat arrhythmias, including atrial fibrillation (AF). However, I(Ks) activates slowly and at a more positive voltage than the plateau of the action potential, therefore it remains uncertain how inhibition of this current would result in a therapeutically meaningful repolarization lengthening. The transient outward potassium current (I(to)), which flows through the Kv 4.3 and Kv 4.2 channels, is relatively large in the atrial cells, which suggests that inhibition of this current may cause substantial prolongation of repolarization predominantly in the atria. Although it was reported that some antiarrhythmic drugs (quinidine, disopyramide, flecainide, propafenone, tedisamil) inhibit I(to), no specific blockers for I(to) are currently available. Similarly, no specific inhibitors for the Kir 2.1, 2.2, 2.3 channels, which carry the inward rectifier potassium current (I(kl)), have been developed making difficult to judge the possible beneficial effects of such drugs in both ventricular arrhythmias and AF. Recently, a specific potassium channel (Kv 1.5 channel) has been described in human atrium, which carries the ultrarapid, delayed rectifier potassium current (I(Kur)). The presence of this current has not been observed in the ventricular muscle, which raises the possibility that by specific inhibition of this channel, atrial repolarization can be lengthened without similar effect in the ventricle. Therefore, AF could be terminated and torsades de pointes arrhythmia avoided. Several compounds were reported to inhibit I(Kur)(flecainide, tedisamil, perhexiline, quinidine, ambasilide, AVE 0118), but none of them can be considered as specific for Kv 1.5 channels. Similarly to Kv 1.5 channels, acetylcholine activated potassium channels carry repolarizing current (I(KAch)) in the atria and not in the ventricle during normal vagal tone and after parasympathetic activation. Specific blockers of I(KAch) can, therefore, also be a possible candidate to treat AF without imposing proarrhythmic risk on the ventricle. At present several compounds (amiodarone, dronedarone, aprindine, pirmenol, SD 3212) were shown to inhibit I(KAch) but none of them proved to be selective. Further research is needed to develop specific K-channel blockers, such as I(Kur)and I(KAch) inhibitors, and to establish their possible therapeutic value.

Action Potentials↗

Adsorption of charged non-albumin bound drugs by amorphous silica.

We investigated the in vitro drug adsorption of PQ 10150 sodium silicate gel (AIS, Santa Clara, CA) with particle size of 230 microns and surface area of 400 m2/g. We observed 99% to 88% adsorption of gentamicin; a mean 91% of disopyramide; a mean 89% of quinidine at low concentration, falling to 75% at higher concentration. Insulin was 88% adsorbed at low concentrations but less so (65%) at higher concentrations. We observed a mean 83% adsorption of procainamide, a mean 84% of N-acetyl procainamide, 74% of lidocaine, 73% of amitriptyline, and 44% of desipramine. We found an average of 14% reduction of total digoxin concentration when serum containing digoxin (2 to 33 ng/mL) was exposed to sodium silicate, while the reduction in free digoxin concentration was 16%. Five percent ethosuximide was also removed. The adsorption of theophylline, phenobarbital, acetaminophen, phenytoin, ethylene glycol, methotrexate, salicylate, thiocyanate and diazepam was minimal and not significant. We conclude that significant amounts of charged, non-albumin bound drugs can be removed by PQ 10150 sodium silicate gel.

Adsorption↗

Broad sensitivity of rodent arrhythmia models to class I, II, III, and IV antiarrhythmic agents.

To determine specificity of rodent models of arrhythmia for different Vaughan Williams classes of antiarrhythmic drugs, we tested 17 drugs from the four classes in one in vitro and four in vivo models. In the mouse chloroform-induced ventricular fibrillation model and in the guinea pig ouabain-induced arrhythmia model, drugs of classes I (amefalone, aprindine, lidocaine, mexiletine, phenytoin, procainamide, or quinidine), II (metoprolol or propranolol), and IV (bepridil) were active. Class III drugs (bretylium, clofilium, or melperone did not suppress ouabain arrhythmias, but were active in the mouse chloroform model. In the rat coronary artery ligation model, disopyramide (class I), amefalone and melperone significantly (P less than 0.05) reduced the number of extrasystoles. Propranolol, sotalol, and verapamil (class IV) were less effective. In the rat coronary artery ligation/reperfusion model, all four classes of antiarrhythmic agents were active in vitro (isolated heart) and in vivo (anesthetized rat). Thus, one model of automaticity, the guinea pig ouabain model, detected class I, II, and IV drugs, whereas another automaticity model, the mouse chloroform model, also detected class III agents. The model of reentry induced by ischemia plus reperfusion (rat coronary artery ligation reperfusion) can be recommended as a screen for new antiarrhythmic agents based on its sensitivity to all four classes of antiarrhythmic drugs. The Vaughan Williams class of an antiarrhythmic agent must be determined, however, by additional mechanism studies.

Animals↗

Serial electrophysiologic testing of drug therapy in supraventricular tachycardia related to accessory pathways.

Data are limited on the use of serial electrophysiologic testing of drug therapy in patients with supraventricular tachycardia associated with accessory pathways, including the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. Twenty-four highly symptomatic patients (aged 36 +/- 11 years) with SVT related to accessory pathways underwent electrophysiologic studies to select an effective chronic oral treatment. Conventional (verapamil, propranolol, quinidine, disopyramide) and investigational (amiodarone, aprindine, propafenone) drugs were used alone and in combination if necessary. It was determined that serial electrophysiologic studies could identify potentially effective treatments in 66% of patients with reentrant SVT involving accessory pathways, and the findings were highly predictive of long-term clinical outcome.

Adult↗

Unexplained syncope evaluated by electrophysiologic studies and head-up tilt testing.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical characteristics of subgroups of patients with unexplained syncope having electrophysiologic studies and head-up tilt testing and to assess the efficacy of various therapies. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Inpatient services of a tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Eighty-six consecutively referred patients with unexplained syncope. MEASUREMENTS: All patients had electrophysiologic examinations. Patients with negative results subsequently had head-up tilt testing. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-nine (34%) patients (group 1) had abnormal electrophysiologic results, with sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia induced in 72%. Thirty-four (40%) patients (group 2) had syncope provoked by head-up tilt testing. The cause of syncope remained unexplained in 23 (26%) patients (group 3). Structural heart disease was present in 76%, 6%, and 30% of groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. In group 1, pharmacologic or nonpharmacologic therapy was recommended based on electrophysiologic evaluation. All group 2 patients had negative results on head-up tilt testing while receiving oral beta blockers (27 patients) or disopyramide (7 patients). Group 3 patients did not receive any specific therapy. During a median follow-up period of 18.5 months, syncope recurred in 9 (10%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of electrophysiologic evaluation and head-up tilt testing can identify the underlying cause of syncope in as many as 74% of patients presenting with unexplained syncope. Therapeutic strategies formulated according to the results of these diagnostic tests appear to prevent syncope effectively in most patients.

Adolescent↗

Risk of initiating antiarrhythmic drug therapy for atrial fibrillation in patients admitted to a university hospital.

BACKGROUND: The risks of antiarrhythmic therapy are increasingly recognized, but the risks associated with the initiation of antiarrhythmic therapy in patients hospitalized for atrial fibrillation are poorly defined. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence, time course, and predictors of adverse cardiac events that require intervention during initiation of antiarrhythmic drug therapy for atrial fibrillation. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: University hospital. PARTICIPANTS: 417 consecutive patients who underwent a total of 597 drug trials during a total of 550 hospitalizations for atrial fibrillation. INTERVENTION: Initiation of therapy with antiarrhythmic drugs: procainamide (189 trials), quinidine (179 trials), disopyramide (20 trials), propafenone (110 trials), flecainide (2 trials), sotalol (72 trials), and amiodarone (25 trials). Electrical conversion was performed during 247 trials. MEASUREMENTS: Incidence of adverse events and daily hazard rate were measured. Logistic regression was done to identify risk factors. RESULTS: During the 597 drug trials, 80 (13.4%) cardiac adverse events occurred in 73 patients. The risk was greatest during the first 24 hours of therapy. Bradyarrhythmias were the most common adverse event, occurring in 47 trials (7.9%); prolongation of the QT interval warranting discontinuation of drug therapy (9 trials; 1.5%) and ventricular arrhythmias (8 trials; 1.3%) were less frequent. In multivariate analysis, previous myocardial infarction was associated with increased risk (odds ratio, 1.90 [95% CI, 1.05 to 3.43]) and the association between older age and increased risk (odds ratio, 1.29 per decade [CI, 0.97 to 1.72]) was of borderline statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: A significant risk for cardiac adverse events exists during initiation of antiarrhythmic therapy in patients hospitalized for atrial fibrillation. Observation with electrocardiographic monitoring seems advisable for 24 to 48 hours during initiation of antiarrhythmic therapy, particularly for elderly patients and patients who have previously had myocardial infarction.

Adult↗

Management of newly detected atrial fibrillation: a clinical practice guideline from the American Academy of Family Physicians and the American College of Physicians.

The Joint Panel of the American Academy of Family Physicians and the American College of Physicians, in collaboration with the Johns Hopkins Evidence-based Practice Center, systematically reviewed the available evidence on the management of newly detected atrial fibrillation and developed recommendations for adult patients with first-detected atrial fibrillation. The recommendations do not apply to patients with postoperative or post-myocardial infarction atrial fibrillation, patients with class IV heart failure, patients already taking antiarrhythmic drugs, or patients with valvular disease. The target physician audience is internists and family physicians dedicated to primary care. The recommendations are as follows: RECOMMENDATION 1: Rate control with chronic anticoagulation is the recommended strategy for the majority of patients with atrial fibrillation. Rhythm control has not been shown to be superior to rate control (with chronic anticoagulation) in reducing morbidity and mortality and may be inferior in some patient subgroups to rate control. Rhythm control is appropriate when based on other special considerations, such as patient symptoms, exercise tolerance, and patient preference. Grade: 2A. RECOMMENDATION 2: Patients with atrial fibrillation should receive chronic anticoagulation with adjusted-dose warfarin, unless they are at low risk of stroke or have a specific contraindication to the use of warfarin (thrombocytopenia, recent trauma or surgery, alcoholism). Grade: 1A. RECOMMENDATION 3: For patients with atrial fibrillation, the following drugs are recommended for their demonstrated efficacy in rate control during exercise and while at rest: atenolol, metoprolol, diltiazem, and verapamil (drugs listed alphabetically by class). Digoxin is only effective for rate control at rest and therefore should only be used as a second-line agent for rate control in atrial fibrillation. Grade: 1B. RECOMMENDATION 4: For those patients who elect to undergo acute cardioversion to achieve sinus rhythm in atrial fibrillation, both direct-current cardioversion (Grade: 1C+) and pharmacological conversion (Grade: 2A) are appropriate options. RECOMMENDATION 5: Both transesophageal echocardiography with short-term prior anticoagulation followed by early acute cardioversion (in the absence of intracardiac thrombus) with postcardioversion anticoagulation versus delayed cardioversion with pre- and postanticoagulation are appropriate management strategies for those patients who elect to undergo cardioversion. Grade: 2A. RECOMMENDATION 6: Most patients converted to sinus rhythm from atrial fibrillation should not be placed on rhythm maintenance therapy since the risks outweigh the benefits. In a selected group of patients whose quality of life is compromised by atrial fibrillation, the recommended pharmacologic agents for rhythm maintenance are amiodarone, disopyramide, propafenone, and sotalol (drugs listed in alphabetical order). The choice of agent predominantly depends on specific risk of side effects based on patient characteristics. Grade: 2A.

Adult↗