Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Axons”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,549 records · Page 86Linked to original sources

Physiological properties of anatomically identified axo-axonic cells in the rat hippocampus.

1. The properties of a well-defined type of GABAergic local circuit neuron, the axo-axonic cell (n = 17), were investigated in rat hippocampal slice preparations. During intracellular recording we injected axo-axonic cells with biocytin and subsequently identified them with correlated light and electron microscopy. Employing an immunogold-silver intensification technique we showed that one of the physiologically characterized cells was immunoreactive for gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA). 2. Axo-axonic cells were encountered in the dentate gyrus (n = 5) as well as subfields CA3 (n = 2) and CA1 (n = 10). They generally had smooth, beaded dendrites that extended throughout all hippocampal layers. Their axons ramified densely in the cell body layers and in the subjacent stratum oriens or hilus, respectively. Tested with electron microscopy, labeled terminals (n = 53) established synapses exclusively with the axon initial segment of principal cells in strata oriens and pyramidale and rarely in lower radiatum. Within a 400-microns slice a single CA1 axo-axonic cell was estimated to be in synaptic contact with 686 pyramidal cells. 3. Axo-axonic cells (n = 14) had a mean resting membrane potential of -65.1 mV, an average input resistance of 73.9 M omega, and a mean time constant of 7.7 ms. Action potentials were of short duration (389-microseconds width at half-amplitude) and had a mean amplitude of 64.1 mV. 4. Nine of 10 tested cells showed a varying degree of spike frequency adaptation in response to depolarizing current injection. Current-evoked action potentials were usually curtailed by a deep (10.2 mV) short-latency afterhyperpolarization (AHP) with a mean duration of 28.1 ms. 5. Cells with strong spike frequency accommodation (n = 5) had a characteristic firing pattern with numerous spike doublets. These appeared to be triggered by an underlying depolarizing afterpotential. In the same cells, prolonged bursts of action potentials were followed by a prominent long-duration AHP with a mean time constant of 1.15 s. 6. Axo-axonic cells responded to the stimulation of afferent pathways with short-latency excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) or at higher stimulation intensity with up to three action potentials. Axo-axonic cells in the dentate gyrus could be activated by stimulating the CA3 area as well as the perforant path, whereas in the CA1 area responses were elicited after shocks to the perforant path, Schaffer collaterals, and the stratum oriens-alveus border. 7. In the CA1 area the EPSP amplitude increased in response to membrane hyperpolarization.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Afferent Pathways↗

Retinal afferent ingrowth to neocortical transplants in the adult rat superior colliculus is due to the regeneration of damaged axons.

Retinal afferent ingrowth to embryonic neural transplants in the adult rat superior colliculus may represent either sprouting of intact axons or the regeneration of transected axons. If ingrowth represents regeneration of damaged retinofugal axons, then lesions that axotomize more retinofugal axons at the transplantation site should induce greater retinal afferent ingrowth. Alternately, if ingrowth represents terminal or collateral sprouting of intact retinofugal axons at or near the transplant/host optic layer interface, then the magnitude of retinal afferent ingrowth should be directly related to the total area of this interface. To test between these two hypotheses surgical knife wounds were made either parallel (in the sagittal plane) or perpendicular (in the transverse plane) to the course of axons in the stratum opticum, embryonic neocortical tissue was transplanted at the coordinates of these tectal slits, and retinal afferent ingrowth visualized 1-90 days after surgery using anterogradely transported HRP. A zone of traumatic reaction (ztr) in the optic layers was seen in every case, characterized by hypertrophied axons and swollen terminal clubs at 1 day. Between 30 and 90 days the damaged retinofugal axons in the zone formed dense fascicles and neuroma-like tangles. Retinal afferent ingrowth occurred only across transplant interface regions with the ztr. The magnitude of ingrowth was directly related to the area of the ztr interface and not the total optic layer interface area. Retinal afferent ingrowth appears to reflect the intrinsic regenerative capacity of adult mammalian retinal ganglion cells and not sprouting of undamaged axons.

Animals↗

Monoclonal antibody against a neuronal antigen impairs formation of the axon scaffold in grasshopper central nervous system.

The pathway a growing axon follows is determined by a number of cues, including differential adhesion to surface molecules on axons and the matrix of the fascicles along which they grow. We have characterized the differential expression of an extracellular antigen and the effects of a monoclonal antibody against this molecule on the development of the grasshopper central nervous system (CNS). The 5C1 monoclonal antibody was generated against ganglion chains of grasshopper embryos; it labels cell bodies of newly differentiated neurons and their axons as they extend. Electron microscopy of embryos at 42% of development reveals that 5C1 labels neuronal filopodia, axons and somata, and areas of glial membrane in apposition to neurite fascicles. After 70% of development, labeling is lost from axon bundles, but remains on cell bodies. 5C1 also cross-reacts with an epitope expressed in Drosophila CNS during embryonic development. Enzymatic digestion suggests that the antigen recognized by the antibody is likely to be a glycolipid. In embryos exposed to 5C1 during early stages of development of the CNS, at the time when the first axons begin to extend, the formation of axon pathways is blocked or greatly delayed. Our results suggest that the 5C1 antigen participates in the formation of the axon scaffold and may play a functional role in the initiation and maintenance of axon outgrowth during early development of the CNS.

Animals↗

Emergence of axonal tracts in the developing brain of the turbot (Psetta maxima).

In this study we have investigated the pattern of morphogenesis and axogenesis in the turbot brain during embryonic and early larval stages with immunohistochemistry using an antibody against acetylated tubulin. The first immunoreactive elements were detected at 74 h post-fertilization in fibers running in the medial and lateral longitudinal fascicles. Newly positive axonal bundles are progressively added during development forming rostrocaudally directed tracts. The tract of the postoptic commissure appears at 86 h post-fertilization located rostrally to the medial longitudinal fascicle. Together, the medial longitudinal fascicle and the tract of the postoptic commissure constitute a major longitudinal axonal pathway, which is extended rostrally in embryos of 98 h post-fertilization by the supraoptic tract. In the forebrain, two vertical tracts, the tract of the posterior commissure (appearing around 98 h post-fertilization) and the tract of the anterior commissure (detected at 110 h post-fertilization) project descending axons to the pre-existing axonal longitudinal pathway. These early tracts are connected by four associated commissures (ventral tegmental, postoptic, posterior and anterior commissure). Some groups of labeled cell bodies are identified either as the origin of the embryonic tracts or contributing axons to the axonal pathways. Additionally, a conspicuous cluster of large cells, not clearly associated with any axonal bundle, was observed from 98 h post-fertilization lining the caudal floor of the presumptive hypothalamus. Several hypotheses are proposed to determine the nature of these cells. A comparison of the emergence of the axonal circuitry in turbot and that of other teleosts reveals significant analogies, suggesting that a common pattern underlies the establishment of the embryonic tracts in this vertebrate group. The minor differences observed between different teleost species, associated with the absence of some axonal fascicles, is also considered.

Animals↗

A review of axon collateralization in the mammalian visual system.

Axon collateralization appears to represent a prominent feature of the mammalian visual system. Both anatomical and electrophysiological evidence reveal that axon branching occurs in the retinofugal, geniculocortical and visual corticifugal projections. Most of this evidence is provided by studies on the cat, but enough data are available from investigations on the rat and monkey to permit certain interspecies differences to be recognized and evaluated. Axon branching allows individual axons to provide innervation to two or more targets and generally to transmit the same type of visual information to these targets. There is abundant evidence to suggest that two of the three functional classes of retinal ganglion cells and geniculate relay cells (namely Y and W ganglion and relay cells) utilize axon branching; however, few details regarding this subject are currently available. The third functional class of ganglion and relay cells (X ganglion and relay cells) essentially lacks axon branches. This review has three primary goals: (1) to review the pertinent anatomical and electrophysiological literature dealing with axon branching and to discuss areas in which information is meager and further investigation necessary; (2) to emphasize the need for applying recently developed techniques, such as double-labeling of neurons and electrical collision, to the study of axon collateralization, and (3) to formulate some hypotheses concerning the functional significance of axon branching.

Animals↗

Giant axonal neuropathy: clinical, electrophysiologic, and neuropathologic features in two siblings.

Giant axonal neuropathy is a progressive central-peripheral axonopathy characterized by distention of axons by aggregated neurofilaments. We report two female siblings with giant axonal neuropathy. Both patients developed symptoms of a chronic progressive polyneuropathy at age 3 years. Clinical evidence of central nervous system involvement was present in both cases. Autopsy neuropathologic examination of the older sibling at the age of 11 years revealed numerous giant axons, Rosenthal fibers, and gliosis throughout the brain and spinal cord and typical giant axons in the peripheral nerves. Electrophysiologic studies in the younger sibling indicated brain stem dysfunction, and her sural nerve biopsy revealed enlarged axons packed with neurofilaments. These patients illustrate that neurologic deficits of giant axonal neuropathy result from widespread lesions in the central, as well as peripheral (including autonomic), nervous systems. This occurrence of giant axonal neuropathy in two siblings supports a genetic origin of this disease. This is the first report of autopsy findings in giant axonal neuropathy in an affected sibling.

Axons↗

Molecular analysis of axon repulsion by the notochord.

During development of the amniote peripheral nervous system, the initial trajectory of primary sensory axons is determined largely by the action of axon repellents. We have shown previously that tissues flanking dorsal root ganglia, the notochord lying medially and the dermamyotomes lying laterally, are sources of secreted molecules that prevent axons from entering inappropriate territories. Although there is evidence suggesting that SEMA3A contributes to the repellent activity of the dermamyotome, the nature of the activity secreted by the notochord remains undetermined. We have employed an expression cloning strategy to search for axon repellents secreted by the notochord, and have identified SEMA3A as a candidate repellent. Moreover, using a spectrum of different axon populations to assay the notochord activity, together with neuropilin/Fc receptor reagents to block semaphorin activity in collagen gel assays, we show that SEMA3A probably contributes to notochord-mediated repulsion. Sympathetic axons that normally avoid the midline in vivo are also repelled, in part, by a semaphorin-based notochord activity. Although our results implicate semaphorin signalling in mediating repulsion by the notochord, repulsion of early dorsal root ganglion axons is only partially blocked when using neuropilin/Fc reagents. Moreover, retinal axons, which are insensitive to SEMA3A, are also repelled by the notochord. We conclude that multiple factors act in concert to guide axons in this system, and that further notochord repellents remain to be identified.

Animals↗

On the turning of Xenopus retinal axons induced by ephrin-A5.

The Eph family of receptor tyrosine kinases and their ligands, the ephrins, play important roles during development of the nervous system. Frequently they exert their functions through a repellent mechanism, so that, for example, an axon expressing an Eph receptor does not invade a territory in which an ephrin is expressed. Eph receptor activation requires membrane-associated ligands. This feature discriminates ephrins from other molecules sculpturing the nervous system such as netrins, slits and class 3 semaphorins, which are secreted molecules. While the ability of secreted molecules to guide axons, i.e. to change their growth direction, is well established in vitro, little is known about this for the membrane-bound ephrins. Here we set out to investigate--using Xenopus laevis retinal axons--the properties of substratum-bound and (artificially) soluble forms of ephrin-A5 (ephrin-A5-Fc) to guide axons. We find--as expected on the basis of chick experiments - that, when immobilised in the stripe assay, ephrin-A5 has a repellent effect such that retinal axons avoid ephrin-A5-Fc-containing lanes. Also, retinal axons react with repulsive turning or growth cone collapse when confronted with ephrin-A5-Fc bound to beads. However, when added in soluble form to the medium, ephrin-A5 induces growth cone collapse, comparable to data from chick. The analysis of growth cone behaviour in a gradient of soluble ephrin-A5 in the 'turning assay' revealed a substratum-dependent reaction of Xenopus retinal axons. On fibronectin, we observed a repulsive response, with the turning of growth cones away from higher concentrations of ephrin-A5. On laminin, retinal axons turned towards higher concentrations, indicating an attractive effect. In both cases the turning response occurred at a high background level of growth cone collapse. In sum, our data indicate that ephrin-As are able to guide axons in immobilised bound form as well as in the form of soluble molecules. To what degree this type of guidance is relevant for the in vivo situation remains to be shown.

Animals↗

Disruption of gradient expression of Zic3 resulted in abnormal intra-retinal axon projection.

The targeting of retinal ganglion axons toward the optic disc is the first step in axon pathfinding in the visual system. The molecular mechanisms involved in guiding the retinal axons to project towards the optic disc are not well understood. We report that a gene encoding a zinc-finger transcription factor, Zic3, is expressed in a periphery-high and center-low gradient in the retina at the stages of active axon extension inside the retina. The gradient expression of Zic3 recedes towards the periphery over the course of development, correlating with the progression of retinal cell differentiation and axonogenesis. Disruption of gradient expression of Zic3 by retroviral overexpression resulted in mis-targeting of retinal axons and some axons misrouted to the sub-retinal space at the photoreceptor side of the retina. Misexpression of Zic3 did not affect neurogenesis or differentiation inside the retina, or grossly alter retinal lamination. By stripe assay, we show that misexpression of Zic3 may induce the expression of an inhibitory factor to the retinal axons. Zic3 appears to play a role in intra-retinal axon targeting, possibly through regulation of the expression of specific downstream genes involved in axon guidance.

Animals↗

Matrix metalloproteinases are required for retinal ganglion cell axon guidance at select decision points.

Axons receive guidance information from extrinsic cues in their environment in order to reach their targets. In the frog Xenopus laevis, retinal ganglion cell (RGC) axons make three key guidance decisions en route through the brain. First, they cross to the contralateral side of the brain at the optic chiasm. Second, they turn caudally in the mid-diencephalon. Finally, they must recognize the optic tectum as their target. The matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) and a disintegrin and metalloproteinase (ADAM) families are zinc (Zn)-dependent proteolytic enzymes. The latter functions in axon guidance, but a similar role has not yet been identified for the MMP family. Our previous work implicated metalloproteinases in the guidance decisions made by Xenopus RGC axons. To test specifically the importance of MMPs, we used two different in vivo exposed brain preparations in which RGC axons were exposed to an MMP-specific pharmacological inhibitor (SB-3CT), either as they reached the optic chiasm or as they extended through the diencephalon en route to the optic tectum. Interestingly, SB-3CT affected only two of the guidance decisions, with misrouting defects at the optic chiasm and tectum. Only at higher concentrations was RGC axon extension also impaired. These data implicate MMPs in the guidance of vertebrate axons, and suggest that different metalloproteinases function to regulate axon behaviour at distinct choice points: an MMP is important in guidance at the optic chiasm and the target, while either a different MMP or an ADAM is required for axons to make the turn in the mid-diencephalon.

Animals↗

The cell adhesion molecule NrCAM is crucial for growth cone behaviour and pathfinding of retinal ganglion cell axons.

We investigated the role of the cell adhesion molecule NrCAM for axonal growth and pathfinding in the developing retina. Analysis of the distribution pattern of NrCAM in chick embryo retina sections and flat-mounts shows its presence during extension of retinal ganglion cell (RGC) axons; NrCAM is selectively present on RGC axons and is absent from the soma. Single cell cultures show an enrichment of NrCAM in the distal axon and growth cone. When offered as a substrate in addition to Laminin, NrCAM promotes RGC axon extension and the formation of growth cone protrusions. In substrate stripe assays, mimicking the NrCAM-displaying optic fibre layer and the Laminin-rich basal lamina, RGC axons preferentially grow on NrCAM lanes. The three-dimensional analysis of RGC growth cones in retina flat-mounts reveals that they are enlarged and form more protrusions extending away from the correct pathway under conditions of NrCAM-inhibition. Time-lapse analyses show that these growth cones pause longer to explore their environment, proceed for shorter time spans, and retract more often than under control conditions; in addition, they often deviate from the correct pathway towards the optic fissure. Inhibition of NrCAM in organ-cultured intact eyes causes RGC axons to misroute at the optic fissure; instead of diving into the optic nerve head, these axons cross onto the opposite side of the retina. Our results demonstrate a crucial role for NrCAM in the navigation of RGC axons in the developing retina towards the optic fissure, and also for pathfinding into the optic nerve.

Animals↗

Dorsally derived netrin 1 provides an inhibitory cue and elaborates the 'waiting period' for primary sensory axons in the developing spinal cord.

Dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons extend axons to specific targets in the gray matter of the spinal cord. During development, DRG axons grow into the dorsolateral margin of the spinal cord and projection into the dorsal mantle layer occurs after a ;waiting period' of a few days. Netrin 1 is a long-range diffusible factor expressed in the ventral midline of the developing neural tube, and has chemoattractive and chemorepulsive effects on growing axons. Netrin 1 is also expressed in the dorsal spinal cord. However, the roles of dorsally derived netrin 1 remain totally unknown. Here, we show that dorsal netrin 1 controls the correct guidance of primary sensory axons. During the waiting period, netrin 1 is transiently expressed or upregulated in the dorsal spinal cord, and the absence of netrin 1 results in the aberrant projection of sensory axons, including both cutaneous and proprioceptive afferents, into the dorsal mantle layer. Netrin 1 derived from the dorsal spinal cord, but not the floor plate, is involved in the correct projection of DRG axons. Furthermore, netrin 1 suppresses axon outgrowth from DRG in vitro. Unc5c(rcm) mutant shows abnormal invasion of DRG axons as observed in netrin 1 mutants. These results are the first direct evidence that netrin 1 in the dorsal spinal cord acts as an inhibitory cue for primary sensory axons and is a crucial signal for the formation of sensory afferent neural networks.

Animals↗

Orientation of commissural axons in vitro in response to a floor plate-derived chemoattractant.

Developing axons are guided to their targets by molecular cues in their local environment. Some cues are short-range, deriving from cells along axonal pathways. There is also increasing evidence for longer-range guidance cues, in the form of gradients of diffusible chemoattractant molecules, which originate from restricted populations of target cells. The guidance of developing commissural axons within the spinal cord depends on one of their intermediate cellular targets, the floor plate. We have shown previously that floor plate cells secrete a diffusible factor(s) that can alter the direction of commissural axon growth in vitro. Here we show that the factor is an effective chemoattractant for commissural axons. It can diffuse considerable distances through a collagen gel matrix and through dorsal and ventral neural epithelium in vitro to reorient the growth of virtually all commissural axons. The orientation of axons occurs in the absence of detectable effects on the survival of commissural neurons or on the rate of commissural axon extension. The regionally restricted expression of the factor suggests that it is present in the embryonic spinal cord in a gradient with its high point at the floor plate. These observations support the idea that the guidance of commissural axons to the ventral midline of the spinal cord results in part from the secretion of a chemoattractant by the floor plate.

Animals↗

Expression of the protein zero myelin gene in axon-related Schwann cells is linked to basal lamina formation.

A Schwann cell has the potential to differentiate into either a myelinating or ensheathing cell depending upon signals received from the axon that it contacts. Studies focusing on the pathway leading to myelination demonstrated that Schwann cells must form a basal lamina in order to myelinate an axon. In this report, we describe studies that indicate that initiation of basal lamina synthesis is required for Schwann cells to distinguish between myelination-inducing axons and axons that do not induce myelination, and to respond by undergoing the appropriate genetic and cellular changes. We have used high resolution in situ hybridization, immunocytochemistry and electron microscopy to examine changes in gene expression and morphology of Schwann cells differentiating into myelin-forming cells in vitro. These experiments were carried out in dorsal root ganglion neuron/Schwann cell co-cultures maintained in either serum-free, serum-only or serum-plus-ascorbate-containing medium. We have made four novel observations that contribute significantly to our understanding of how basal lamina and myelination are linked. (1) The addition of ascorbate (in the presence of serum), which promotes basal lamina production, appears to induce expression of the protein zero gene encoding the major structural protein of myelin. Moreover, expression of protein zero mRNA and protein, and its insertion into myelin membranes, occurs only in the subset of Schwann cells contacting myelination-inducing axons. Schwann cells in contact with axons that do not induce myelination, or Schwann cells that have not established a unitary relationship with an axon, do not express protein zero mRNA although they produce basal lamina components. (2) In serum-free conditions, a majority of Schwann cells express protein zero mRNA and protein, but this change in gene expression is not associated with basal lamina formation or with elongation of the Schwann cell along the axon and elaboration of myelin. (3) In the presence of serum (and the absence of ascorbate), Schwann cells again fail to form basal lamina or elongate but no longer express protein zero mRNA or protein. (4) Myelin-associated glycoprotein and galactocerebroside, two additional myelin-specific components, can be expressed by Schwann cells under any of the three culture conditions. Therefore, we have demonstrated that axonal induction of protein zero gene expression in Schwann cells is subject to regulation by both serum- and ascorbate-dependent pathways and that not all myelin-specific proteins are regulated in the same manner.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Animals↗

Expression of a lacZ transgene reveals floor plate cell morphology and macromolecular transfer to commissural axons.

The floor plate is situated at the ventral midline of the neural tube and is an important intermediate target for commissural axons. During elongation, these axons converge bilaterally on the ventral midline neural tube and after crossing the floor plate make an abrupt rostral turn. Ample evidence indicates that the initial projection of commissural axons to the floor plate is guided by a chemotropic factor secreted by floor plate cells. However, the way in which the subsequent interaction of these axons with the floor plate leads them to make further trajectory changes remains undefined. In an effort to gain further understanding of the structure and function of floor plate cells, we have taken advantage of a line of transgenic mice in which these cells express beta-galactosidase and thus can be stained by histochemical means. In this line, a genomic imprinting mechanism restricts the expression of the lacZ transgene to only a proportion of the floor plate cells, allowing their morphology to be appreciated with particular clarity. Our analysis revealed that the basal processes of floor plate cells are flattened in their rostrocaudal dimension and possess fine lateral branches which are aligned with commissural axons. Unexpectedly, beta-galactosidase activity was also detected within longer transverse linear profiles traversing the floor plate whose ultrastructural appearance was not that of floor plate cells but instead corresponded to that of commissural axons. Enzyme activity was not detected in more proximal axonal segments or in the neuronal cell bodies from which these axons originated. Therefore, we propose that the transgene product, and potentially other proteins synthesized by floor plate cells, can be transferred to decussating axons.

Animals↗

The branchial arches and HGF are growth-promoting and chemoattractant for cranial motor axons.

During development, cranial motor neurons extend their axons along distinct pathways into the periphery. For example, branchiomotor axons extend dorsally to leave the hindbrain via large dorsal exit points. They then grow in association with sensory ganglia, to their targets, the muscles of the branchial arches. We have investigated the possibility that pathway tissues might secrete diffusible chemorepellents or chemoattractants that guide cranial motor axons, using co-cultures in collagen gels. We found that explants of dorsal neural tube or hindbrain roof plate chemorepelled cranial motor axons, while explants of cranial sensory ganglia were weakly chemoattractive. Explants of branchial arch mesenchyme were strongly growth-promoting and chemoattractive for cranial motor axons. Enhanced and oriented axon outgrowth was also elicited by beads loaded with Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF); antibodies to this protein largely blocked the outgrowth and orientation effects of the branchial arch on motor axons. HGF was expressed in the branchial arches, whilst Met, which encodes an HGF receptor, was expressed by subpopulations of cranial motor neurons. Mice with targetted disruptions of HGF or Met showed defects in the navigation of hypoglossal motor axons into the branchial region. Branchial arch tissue may thus act as a target-derived factor that guides motor axons during development. This influence is likely to be mediated partly by Hepatocyte Growth Factor, although a component of branchial arch-mediated growth promotion and chemoattraction was not blocked by anti-HGF antibodies.

Animals↗

Roundabout signalling, cell contact and trophic support confine longitudinal glia and axons in the Drosophila CNS.

Contrary to our knowledge of the genetic control of midline crossing, the mechanisms that generate and maintain the longitudinal axon pathways of the Drosophila CNS are largely unknown. The longitudinal pathways are formed by ipsilateral pioneer axons and the longitudinal glia. The longitudinal glia dictate these axonal trajectories and provide trophic support to later projecting follower neurons. Follower interneuron axons cross the midline once and join these pathways to form the longitudinal connectives. Once on the contralateral side, longitudinal axons are repelled from recrossing the midline by the midline repulsive signal Slit and its axonal receptor Roundabout. We show that longitudinal glia also transiently express roundabout, which halts their ventral migration short of the midline. Once in contact with axons, glia cease to express roundabout and become dependent on neurons for their survival. Trophic support and cell-cell contact restrict glial movement and axonal trajectories. The significance of this relationship is revealed when neuron-glia interactions are disrupted by neuronal ablation or mutation in the glial cells missing gene, which eliminates glia, when axons and glia cross the midline despite continued midline repellent signalling.

Animals↗

GAP-43 promoter elements in transgenic zebrafish reveal a difference in signals for axon growth during CNS development and regeneration.

A pivotal event in neural development is the point at which differentiating neurons become competent to extend long axons. Initiation of axon growth is equally critical for regeneration. Yet we have a limited understanding of the signaling pathways that regulate the capacity for axon growth during either development or regeneration. Expression of a number of genes encoding growth associated proteins (GAPs) accompanies both developmental and regenerative axon growth and has led to the suggestion that the same signaling pathways regulate both modes of axon growth. We have tested this possibility by asking whether a promoter fragment from a well characterized GAP gene, GAP-43, is sufficient to activate expression in both developing and regenerating neurons. We generated stable lines of transgenic zebrafish that express green fluorescent protein (GFP) under regulation of a 1 kb fragment of the rat GAP-43 gene, a fragment that contains a number of evolutionarily conserved elements. Analysis of GFP expression in these lines confirms that the rat 1 kb region can direct growth-associated expression of the transgene in differentiating neurons that extend long axons. Furthermore, this region supports developmental down-regulation of transgene expression which, like the endogenous gene, coincides with neuronal maturation. Strikingly, these same sequences are insufficient for directing expression in regenerating neurons. This finding suggests that signaling pathways regulating axon growth during development and regeneration are not the same. While these results do not exclude the possibility that pathways involved in developmental axon growth are also active in regenerative growth, they do indicate that signaling pathway(s) controlling activation of the GAP-43 gene after CNS injury differ in at least one key component from the signals controlling essential features of developmental axon growth.

Animals↗