Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Insurance Carriers”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,531 records · Page 85Linked to original sources
PubMed1992

Medicare program; criteria and standards for evaluating intermediary and carrier performance during FY 1993--HCFA. General notice with comment period.

This notice describes the criteria and standards to be used for evaluating the performance of fiscal intermediaries and carriers in the administration of the Medicare program beginning October 1, 1992. The results of these evaluations are considered whenever HCFA enters into, renews, or terminates an intermediary agreement or carrier contract or takes other contract actions (e.g., assigning or reassigning providers of services to an intermediary, designating regional or national intermediaries, etc.). This notice is published in accordance with sections 1816(f) and 1842(b)(2) of the Social Security Act. We are publishing for public comment in the Federal Register those criteria and standards against which we evaluate intermediaries and carriers.

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S.↗
PubMed1990

Criteria and standards for evaluating intermediary and carrier performance--HCFA. General notice with comment period.

This notice describes the criteria and standards to be used for evaluating the performance of fiscal intermediaries and carriers in the administration of the Medicare program beginning October 1, 1990. The results of these evaluations are considered whenever HCFA enters into, renews, or terminates an intermediary agreement or carrier contract or takes other contract actions; assigns or reassigns providers of services to an intermediary; or designates regional or national intermediaries. This notice is published in accordance with sections 1816(f) and 1842(b)(2) of the Social Security Act, which requires us to publish for public comment in the Federal Register those criteria and standards against which we evaluate intermediaries and carriers.

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S.↗
PubMed2006

Health plans respond to parity: managing behavioral health care in the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program.

The government often uses the Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program as a model for both public and private health policy choices. In 2001, the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) implemented full parity, requiring that FEHB carriers offer mental health and substance abuse benefits equal to general medical benefits. OPM instructed carriers to alter their benefit design but permitted them to determine whether they would manage care and what structures or processes they would use. This article reports on the experience of 156 carriers and the government-wide BlueCross and BlueShield Service Benefit Plan. Carriers dropped cost-restraining benefit limits. A smaller percentage also changed the management of the benefit, but these changes affected the care of many enrollees, making the overall parity effect noteworthy.

Behavioral Medicine↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Government as reinsurer for very-high-cost persons in nongroup health insurance markets.

Fear of adverse selection drives carriers in nongroup insurance markets to compete in their use of selection mechanisms to screen out high-risk applicants. This contributes to economic inefficiency. Government could assume the role of reinsurer, by assuming responsibility for most of the costs of people who are in the highest 2-3 percent of the national spending distribution. This would spread the burden of costs of very-high-cost persons to the broad population base and could cause premiums to fall as carriers spend less on efforts to avoid adverse selection.

Efficiency, Organizational↗
PubMed1994

Medicare program: revisions to criteria and standards for evaluating intermediaries and carriers--HCFA. Final rule.

This rule issues technical amendments to Medicare regulations intended to simplify and improve our system for evaluating the performance of fiscal intermediaries and carriers in the administration of the Medicare program. Currently, we evaluate intermediaries using performance criteria and standards announced in an annual notice in the Federal Register. We are clarifying the methodology for establishing these criteria and standards. For consistency, we establish comparable regulation requirements for the evaluation of carrier performance. These revisions are published in accordance with sections 1816(f) and 1842(b)(2) of the Social Security Act which require us to develop standards, criteria, and procedures to evaluate an intermediary's or carrier's overall performance.

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S.↗
PubMed1998

Federal Employees Health Benefits Program improving carrier performance; conforming changes--OPM. Proposed rulemaking.

The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is proposing to issue a regulation that would amend the Federal Employees Health Benefits Acquisition Regulation (FEHBAR) to underscore accountability for customer service and contractual compliance among the Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program community-rated carriers. The regulation would enable OPM to better manage carriers' performance over key contract areas, including customer service measures, information and reporting requirements, and significant events that might affect service to enrollees. Accurate and timely performance by carriers will facilitate the Program meeting its customer service standards.

Contract Services↗