Fulminant colitis: the case for operative treatment.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: In patients with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) the influences of psychosocial variables and of extraintestinal manifestations of ulcerative colitis (UC) on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) have not been studied so far. METHODS: 61 patients with UC (age 52.7+/-13.9 years; 47% female) completed the German version of the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ-D), the Short Form Health Survey (SF - 36), the German version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D) and the Giessener Symptom List (GBB 24). Independent of their current clinical activity 37 patients underwent endoscopies. Pouchitis was defined by the Pouch Disease Activity Score (PDAI) > or = 7. Where possible, IPAA-patients were compared with the data for the German general population and with a clinical sample of patients with UC and no IPAA. RESULTS: Patients with IPAA complained more about fatigue and arthralgia and a reduced physical and mental health (SF-36) than the German general population (P < 0.01). The IBDQ-total score could be predicted (adjusted R2 = 29.1, P < 0.01) by the number of operations due to IPAA-related complications (beta = -18.8) and HADS-D-Anxiety scores > or = 11 (beta = -29.1). The IBDQ-subscale score "Bowel" could be predicted (adjusted R2 = 13.7, P = 0.04) by PDAI > or = 7 (beta = -9.2) and the subscale score "Systemic" (adjusted R2 = 13.3, P = 0.04) by the number of extraintestinal manifestations (beta = -1.9). CONCLUSIONS: HRQOL of patients with UC and IPAA is determined not only by IPAA-related factors but also by anxiety and extraintestinal manifestations with associated musculoskeletal pain.
OBJECTIVE: We describe the prolonged clinical benefit of murine chimeric antitumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha monoclonal antibody, infliximab, on pediatric patients with Crohn's disease and ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA). METHODS: A retrospective review of patients originally diagnosed with ulcerative colitis, status post colectomy and IPAA, who developed findings compatible with Crohn's disease was undertaken. Refractory pouchitis developed in all patients as well as protracted symptoms of diarrhea, abdominal pain, joint pain, and incontinence. All patients received infliximab. RESULTS: Four pediatric patients (2 males and 2 females) with mean age of 14.5 years (range 11-18 years) were studied. The development of perianal fistulas in 2 patients, granuloma on biopsy in 1 patient and perianal skin tag in 1 patient, led to a diagnosis change of CD. After failure to respond to antibiotics, aminosalicylates and immunomodulators such as azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP), all patients were treated with infliximab. Patients received infliximab infusions at a dose of 5 mg/kg, initially at weeks 0, 2 and 6 and subsequently at 8 weeks intervals in combination with an immunomodulator drug. All patients showed marked improvement clinically, endoscopically, and histologically. CONCLUSION: Infliximab can be used successfully for the treatment of pediatric patients with Crohn's disease and IPAA who are refractory to conventional therapies.
The ileoanal reservoir, or ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, is a relatively new, innovative surgical approach offering normal sphincter preservation to clients with familial adenomatous polyposis and ulcerative colitis. In most patients, the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is performed in two stages. In stage one, the ET nurse must address such patient-education issues as an understanding of the surgical procedure, care of the temporary ileostomy, diet and electrolyte balance, care of the perirectal skin, and the restrengthening of bowel control. Stage two ET nursing interventions focus on perianal skin care, use of medications, sphincter reeducation, and prompt recognition of complications. Written instructions offer the best method of providing crucial information succinctly. Patients require significant physical and emotional support throughout the potentially complex, long-term course until an optimal steady state is achieved.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
PURPOSE: In Japan, leukocytapheresis has become an accepted therapy for ulcerative colitis. The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the efficacy of additional leukocytapheresis in patients with moderate-to-severe recurrence of ulcerative colitis. METHODS: From 1998 to 2002, 35 patients with moderate-to-severe recurrence of ulcerative colitis were treated by intravenous prednisolone only or prednisolone plus leukocytapheresis once per week. Previous clinical features of ulcerative colitis, activity index at four weeks, and subsequent course were compared between patients with leukocytapheresis and those without. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were treated with prednisolone only (prednisolone group), and 19 patients were treated with prednisolone plus leukocytapheresis (leukocytapheresis group). Previous prednisolone dose (13.6 +/- 10.4 g vs. 7.9 +/- 9.8 g; P < 0.05) was higher in the leukocytapheresis group than the prednisolone group. Clinical response rate at four weeks was not different between the two groups (leukocytapheresis group, 68.4 percent vs. prednisolone group, 75 percent). However, ulcerative colitis activity index at four weeks was significantly higher in the leukocytapheresis group than the prednisolone group (180.5 +/- 44.2 vs. 142.5 +/- 45.3; P < 0.05). During the subsequent clinical course, 15 of 35 patients required proctocolectomy (leukocytapheresis group, 11 patients vs. prednisolone group, 4 patients). Proctocolectomy rate was significantly different when patients were divided by previous prednisolone dose (P = 0.0029) and ulcerative colitis activity index at four weeks (P = 0.002), but it was not different according to the application of leukocytapheresis. Cox proportional hazards model revealed previous prednisolone dose to be the only independent risk factor for proctocolectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of leukocytapheresis to prednisolone therapy does not seem beneficial in ulcerative colitis patients with moderate-to-severe recurrence.
PURPOSE: The Malone antegrade continence enema has revolutionized the management of intractable fecal incontinence and constipation. When the appendix is absent, surgical options are limited. Small series with short-term followup have demonstrated the feasibility but not the reliability of the continent colonic tube. We present our experience with a lateral based colonic tube. We also compared lateral based colonic tubes to medial based tubes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of patients treated with a continent colonic tube for intractable fecal incontinence were reviewed. We identified 8 patients who underwent the procedure between July 2000 and February 2003. The literature was reviewed to compare lateral vs medial based tubes. RESULTS: Average followup was 28 months (range 10 to 41). Stomal stenosis developed in 4 patients (50%) within 3 to 6 months of surgery. Passive dilation at the clinic corrected the problem in 3 patients and 1 required operative stomal revision. All 8 patients reported almost complete relief of rectal incontinence and constipation. A literature review demonstrated a significantly higher rate of stomal stenosis in lateral vs medial based colonic tubes (40% vs 12%). CONCLUSIONS: The continent colonic tube is a safe and effective alternative in patients with refractory fecal incontinence and constipation who do not have an available appendix. These results appear durable during the described period. We believe that this technique is an alternative to the cecostomy button and it should be offered to suitable patients. The lateral based colonic tube appears to have a higher rate of stomal stenosis than medial based colonic tubes, which may be attributed to the local blood supply of the colon.
Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has become the standard of care for the 25% of patients with ulcerative colitis who ultimately require colectomy. IPAA is favored by patients because it avoids the necessity for a long-term stoma. This review examines how 3 decades of experience with IPAA has molded current practice, highlighting 5- and 10-year follow-up of large series to determine durability and functional performance, in addition to causes of failure and the management of complications.
Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) may develop inflammation in the distal ileum thought to be due to "backwash" of cecal contents ("backwash ileitis"). However, a systematic analysis of ileal changes in UC has never been performed, and the prevalence and criteria for "backwash" ileitis have not been defined. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and spectrum of inflammatory changes in the ileum in patients with UC and to correlate ileal changes with outcome after total proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Routinely processed ileocolonic resection specimens from 200 consecutive patients with clinically and pathologically confirmed UC were evaluated for a wide variety of pathologic features in the ileum and colon. The ileal data were correlated with both the clinical features and the pathologic findings in the colon. Follow-up data were obtained to confirm absence of Crohn's disease and to evaluate outcome of ileo-anal pouches. Overall, 34 of 200 (17%) UC patients had inflammatory changes in the ileum (male/female ratio, 16/18; mean age, 42 years); 32 of 34 (94%) had pancolitis, which was significantly higher than the rate of pancolitis (39%) in patients without ileal disease (N = 166) (P < 0.001), but there were no other differences between patients with or without ileal pathology. In the colon, 22 of 34 (65%) patients had severe activity. Ileal changes included villous atrophy and crypt regeneration without increased inflammation (N = 3), increased neutrophilic and mononuclear inflammation in the lamina propria (N = 6), patchy cryptitis and crypt abscesses (N = 21) and focal superficial surface erosions (N = 4), some with pyloric metaplasia (N = 2 of 4). In general, the severity of ileal changes paralleled the severity of colonic activity. However, 2 of 4 (50%) patients with superficial erosions in the ileum had subtotal or left-sided colitis only, and had only mild colonic activity. Other cases showed only mild to moderate colonic activity and patchy or discontinuous involvement of the distal ileum. Upon follow-up of patients with erosions (mean, 48.5 months; range, 26-102 months), none developed manifestations of Crohn's disease anywhere in the gastrointestinal tract. The presence of inflammatory changes in the ileum had no effect on the prevalence of pouch complications or on the occurrence of dysplasia or cancer. Ileal changes in UC are not uncommon (prevalence, 17%), are generally mild in nature (villous atrophy, increased inflammation, scattered crypt abscesses), and are not associated with an increased rate of ileo-anal pouch complications, dysplasia, or carcinoma. In some cases, our findings are consistent with a backwash etiology. However, rarely, ileal erosions may occur in patients without cecal involvement, which may indicate that other pathogenetic mechanisms should be considered in the etiology of ileitis in UC patients.
OBJECTIVE To evaluate how age affects functional outcome and quality of life after ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA Because of the limited number of older patients undergoing IPAA, it has been difficult to assess functional outcome and quality of life stratified by age. METHODS IPAA was performed in 1895 patients. Patients were stratified by age into <45 (n = 1410), 46-55 (n = 289), 56-65 (n = 154), and more than 65 years (n = 42). Outcome was assessed prospectively. Results are presented at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years after surgery.RESULTS Patients were followed for 4.6 +/- 3.7 years (maximum, 17 years). Pouch failure occurred in 4.1% (pouch excision or permanent diversion). Incontinence and night time seepage were more common in older patients. There were minor differences in the quality of life, health, energy and happiness between age groups, with a slight benefit for those under 45 years. Fourteen percent or fewer patients experienced social, sexual or work restrictions. Overall, 96% of patients were happy to have undergone their surgery, and 98% recommended it to others. Although the respective figures were 89% and 96% in the over-65 age group, the difference was not significant. CONCLUSIONS These data provide a unique assessment of outcome after IPAA at multiple time points. Although functional outcome after IPAA is not as good in older patients, appropriate case selection confers acceptable function and quality of life to patients of all ages.
In summary, the history and development of the proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis has involved innovative animal and clinical research by several surgical investigators. This evolution followed the classic process of academic surgical progress: a clinical problem is identified; solutions are studied in the laboratory; and these solutions are applied back to the clinical situation with success. Dr. Sabiston's disappointment with clinical results in ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis patients led to laboratory experiments in which a new technique was shown safe in dogs. The further work of his collaborator Dr. Ravitch as well as that of Sir Alan Parks and Dr. Utsunoimya proved small-scale clinical application of the new technique. Finally, large-scale outcomes work by Dr. Fazio at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation and others has allowed further refinements to occur and has highlighted other areas to study. The work of these investigators and other has allowed lack of a permanent ostomy with satisfactory functional results in more than 95% of patients. Continued experience with these procedures has and will lead to further improvements in operative times, morbidity rates, and functional results. Although research in this area will continue, the evolution of this operation has allowed it to become the gold standard for the treatment of ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis.
BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest local excision may be acceptable treatment of T1 adenocarcinoma of the rectum, but there is little comparative data with radical surgery to assess outcomes and quantify risk. We performed a retrospective evaluation of patients with T1 rectal cancers treated by either transanal excision or radical resection at our institution to assess patient selection, cancer recurrence, and survival. METHODS: All patients who underwent surgery for T1 adenocarcinomas of the rectum (0-15 cm from anal verge) by either transanal excision (TAE) or radical resection (RAD) between January 1987 and January 2004 were identified from a prospective database. Data were analyzed using Fisher exact test, Kaplan-Meier method, and log-rank test. RESULTS: Three hundred nineteen consecutive patients with T1 lesions were treated by transanal excision (n = 151) or radical surgery (n = 168) over the 17-year period. RAD surgery was associated with higher tumor location in the rectum, slightly larger tumor size, a similar rate of adverse histology, and a lymph node metastasis rate of 18%. Despite these features, patients who underwent RAD surgery had fewer local recurrences, fewer distant recurrences, and significantly better recurrence-free survival (P = 0.0001). Overall and disease-specific survival was similar for RAD and TAE groups. CONCLUSION: Despite a similar risk profile in the 2 surgical groups, patients with T1 rectal cancer treated by local excision were observed to have a 3- to 5-fold higher risk of tumor recurrence compared with patients treated by radical surgery. Local excision should be reserved for low-risk cancers in patients who will accept an increased risk of tumor recurrence, prolonged surveillance, and possible need for aggressive salvage surgery. Radical resection is the more definitive surgical treatment of T1 rectal cancers.
OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effect of radiotherapy (RT) on sexual function in patients undergoing oncologic resection for rectal cancer, and to develop a mathematical model for quantifying the risk of sexual dysfunction through time for this group of patients. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected on patients undergoing proctosigmoidectomy (group 1: n = 101) or adjuvant radiotherapy (40-50 Gy) and resection (group 2: n = 100) for rectal cancer at a tertiary referral center between December 1998 and July 2004. Study end points were recorded at 7 time intervals (preoperatively, 4 months, 8 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, and 4 years after surgery) and included: 1) ability to have an erection, 2) maintain an erection, 3) attain orgasm, 4) dry orgasm, and 5) whether they were sexually active. Multilevel logistic regression analysis for repeated measures was used to identify factors associated with the sexual dysfunction. A predictive model was developed and internally validated by comparing observed and model-predicted outcomes. RESULTS: Radiotherapy had an adverse effect on the ability to get an erection, maintain an erection, attain orgasm, and being sexually active in comparison with patients undergoing surgery alone (7.4%, 12.6%, 16.2%, and 13.7% reduction 8 months after surgery respectively; P < 0.05). The effect of sexual dysfunction deteriorated with age (odds ratio for erectile function, 0.40 per 10-year increase in age; 95% confidence interval, 0.29-0.49; P < 0.001). A significant variability in sexual function was present among the 7 time points with a maximal deterioration occurring at 8 months after surgery with subsequent slow but not complete recovery (P < 0.001). The predictive model showed adequate discrimination on 4 of the 5 domains of sexual dysfunction (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve >0.70). CONCLUSIONS: Radiotherapy has an adverse effect on sexual function, the effect being maximal at 8 months after surgery. The risk of sexual dysfunction can be quantified preoperatively using the proposed index and can assist patients in making better informed choices on the type of treatment they receive.
OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate the oncologic and functional outcomes of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) with colonic J-pouch reconstruction. BACKGROUND: TME is considered the established gold standard in rectal cancer surgery. However, data on laparoscopic sphincter-preserving TME are limited. METHODS: Patients with mid or low rectal cancer underwent laparoscopic TME with colonic J-pouch reconstruction by a single surgical team. Clinical and oncologic data were prospectively recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: From March 1999 to September 2004, 105 patients underwent laparoscopic TME with colonic J-pouch reconstruction. The mean operating time was 170.4 minutes and mean blood loss was 91.5 mL. The mean anastomotic distance from the anal verge was 3.9 cm. Conversion was required in 2 cases. The mean circumferential and distal margins were 17.1 mm and 3.4 cm, respectively. There was 1 case of microscopic circumferential margin involvement and 1 case of microscopic distal margin involvement. There was no 30-day mortality, and 6 patients underwent reoperation for major complications. There was no port-site metastasis. The mean follow-up time was 26.9 months (range, 1.3-65.6 months). The actuarial 5-year cancer-specific survival and local recurrence rates were 81.3% and 8.9%, respectively. Erectile dysfunction occurred in 13.6% of males, while 2 patients developed incomplete bladder denervation. Bowel function after ileostomy closure was satisfactory, with an average bowel motion of less than 3 times per day at 2 years after ileostomy closure. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic TME with colonic J-pouch reconstruction is a safe procedure with reasonable operating time and does not appear to pose any threat to the oncologic and functional outcomes.
We analyzed outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (LAIPA) from 10 patients (7 with ulcerative colitis and 3 with familial adenomatous polyposis) operated on between January 1998 and March 2004. Median operating time was 246 minutes. There were no intraoperative complications. There were no conversions. Postoperative complications occurred in 3 (30%) patients: 2 cases of wound infection and 1 case of a foreign body retrieved during pouch endoscopy. There was a 30% reoperation rate due to unsuspected duodenal perforation, a persistent postoperative pain, and 1 case of intestinal obstruction after ileostomy closure. There were no deaths. Median time to resumption of diet was 24 hours. Median hospital stay was 7 days. All ileostomies were closed 6 to 8 weeks after LAIPA. LAIPA is feasible and safe and should be selectively offered to nonobese patients.