Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Litigation”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,513 records · Page 84Linked to original sources

Emerging opportunities for physician-attorneys in the purchaser-driven health care industry of the 1990s.

The litigation explosion of the past decade-and-a-half has provided physician-attorneys with a seemingly endless source of opportunities for full- and part-time employment. For this and other reasons, physician-attorneys in the late 1980s still devote a substantial part of their professional time to activities directly or indirectly related to medical litigation. Nevertheless, the winds of change are blowing and soon will reach hurricane force. The excesses of the medical and legal systems (best exemplified by the litigation explosion) have sown the seeds of their own ultimate destruction during the 1990s. As a result of the substantial provider glut, the purchasers of health care are now in charge. To the extent that purchasers determine that professional liability premiums, legal costs, and defensive medical practices increase their health benefit costs, they will redesign benefit programs to provide appropriate financial incentives to channel subscribers to both the high quality, cost-effective providers and alternative medical dispute resolution options other than litigation. As the percentage of lawyers' and law firms' revenues attributable to medical litigation diminishes, one of the first expenses to be cut will be that previously allocable to physician-attorneys for expert medicolegal review and case evaluation. Medical care value purchasing is rapidly becoming the centerpiece of the emerging purchaser-driven health care industry of the 1990s. This should give way to an unprecedented demand by purchasers and providers alike for medical care evaluation, health data analysis, and the implementation of systems to measure and monitor the quality and cost-effectiveness of health care delivery. Providers, especially physician-leaders, can and should play critically important roles in helping purchasers and themselves to evaluate and improve the overall quality and cost-effectiveness of health care services. It is this increasingly important area of expert endeavor in which physician-attorneys can and should find the majority of their long-term professional opportunities. However, to capitalize on this, physician-attorneys must effect a major redirection in their primary emphasis. Although they have a distinctive training advantage in the emerging quality-driven industry over that of physician-M.B.A.s, most physician-attorneys have continued to use these skills in the reactionary world of litigation, which will rapidly go the way of the dinosaur in the 1990s.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Delivery of Health Care↗

Are neurology residents in the United States being taught defensive medicine?

OBJECTIVE: To study whether and how fear of litigation and defensive medicine are communicated during residency training and to assess whether this affects residents' attitudes. METHODS: Neurology residents in the US (n=25) and, as a control group, Neurology residents training in Germany (n=42) were asked to rate multiple items regarding litigation, defensive strategies and how often these issues are raised by teaching physicians. Statistic analysis was performed using nonparametric tests. RESULTS: Residents in both countries indicated that litigation is an "important problem", although US residents stated this significantly more often (p<0.001). Initiation of tests motivated mainly by fear of litigation (p=0.004) and explicit teaching of defensive strategies by teaching physicians (p<0.02) were reported more often by US residents. CONCLUSION: Neurology residents in both the US and Germany perceive a litigational threat, but significantly less so in Germany. This difference may result at least in part from teaching of defensive strategies reported more often in US programs.

Defensive Medicine↗

Medicolegal analysis of 100 malpractice claims against bariatric surgeons.

BACKGROUND: Very few studies have addressed malpractice litigation specific to bariatric surgery. This study was designed to analyze litigation trends in bariatric surgery to prevent further lawsuits and improve patient care. METHODS: A total of 100 consecutive bariatric lawsuits were reviewed by a consortium of experienced bariatric surgeons and an attorney specializing in medical malpractice. RESULTS: Of the 100 lawsuits, 45% were reviewed for defense attorneys. The mean patient age was 40 years (range 18-65), 75% were women, 81% had a body mass index of <60, 31% were diabetic, and 38% had sleep apnea. Of the surgeons, 42% had <1 year of experience, and 26% had done <100 cases. Although 69% of the physicians were members of the American Society of Bariatric Surgery, only 22% had detailed consent forms. The surgical procedures were performed between 1997 and 2005 and included Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (78% total, 33% open, and 45% laparoscopic), vertical banded gastroplasty (3%), minigastric bypass (6%), biliopancreatic diversion/duodenal switch (4%), and revision (9%). Of the 100 cases, 32% involved an intraoperative complication and 72% required additional surgery. The most common adverse events initiating litigation were leaks (53%), intra-abdominal abscess (33%), bowel obstruction (18%), major airway events (10%), organ injury (10%), and pulmonary embolism (8%). From these injuries, 53 patients died, 28% had a full recovery, 12% had a minor disability, and 7% had major disabilities. Evidence of potential negligence was found in 28% of cases. Of these cases, 82% resulted from a delay in diagnosis and 64% from misinterpreted vital signs. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that leaks and delayed diagnosis were the most common cause of litigation. Even experienced bariatric surgeons should understand the most common errors made by others to prevent complications and avoid litigation.

Adolescent↗

Defensive medicine during hospital obstetrical care: a byproduct of the technological age.

This paper presents an alternative perspective on defensive medicine. Defensive medicine is usually understood as arising from the effect of law on medicine through fear of litigation. Of equal significance, however, is the complementary influence of medicine on law through technological innovation, and, more importantly, the way that medicine and law develop dialectically. Each shapes the other in establishing the standards of care central to both clinical medicine and to actual or potential legal action. Excessive testing owing to fear of litigation indicates that defensive medicine is being practised in a particular setting, but it does not explain why this is so. To understand why defensive medicine occurs and why it is so troubling to clinicians requires an understanding, not only of medical and legal developments, but of a political-economic system and the beliefs and values of a society. Defensive medicine is discussed in relation to hospital obstetrical scenarios commonly associated with fear of litigation: fetal oxygen deprivation ("distress"), which is detected using an electronic fetal monitor, and prolonged labor, known as "dystocia". The material presented is taken from a medical anthropological study of obstetrical care in rural British Columbia, Canada. Litigation fears are shown to result less from rare, albeit often devastating, allegations of malpractice than from doctors adopting a role as "fetal champions", together with the introduction of electronic monitoring technology. The paper concludes by asserting that, rather than being in an adversarial relationship, medical practice and associated litigation primarily work together to reinforce each other, and the social conditions in which defensive medicine occurs.

British Columbia↗

Premorbid clues? Preinjury scholastic performance and present neuropsychological functioning in late postconcussion syndrome.

Neuropsychologists rely on demographic variables to form assumptions about premorbid status, and most use years of education as the main variable. School records are a more objective basis for such estimation, particularly in litigated cases. In the present study, final cumulative grade point average (GPA) was regressed on to Halstead-Reitan Battery (HRB), IQ and other neuropsychological test scores in 60 nonmalingering postconcussive litigants and 17 litigants with moderate-severe closed head injury. Results indicated significant correlations between GPA, HRB core tests, commonly used neuropsychological measures, and intelligence. A regression formula indicated litigants with poor grade point average were likely to perform in the impaired range. The present findings suggest the quality of premorbid academic performance also provides an important context in which to view present neuropsychological performance. Marginal premorbid achievement may be a risk factor for late developing postconcussion syndrome and litigation.

Adult↗

Response bias in plaintiffs' histories.

This study investigated response bias in self-reported history of factors relevant to the assessment of traumatic brain injury, toxic brain injury and related emotional distress. Response bias refers to systematic error in self-report data. A total of 446 subjects (comprising 131 litigating and 315 non-litigating adults from five locations in the United States) completed a symptom questionnaire. Data were obtained from university faculty and students, from patients in clinics specializing in physiatry neurology, and family medicine, and from plaintiffs undergoing forensic neuropsychological evaluations. Comparisons were made for litigant and non litigant ratings of their past and current cognitive and emotional functioning, including life in general, ability to concentrate, memory, depression, anxiety, alcohol, drugs, ability to work or attend school, irritability, headaches, confusion, self-esteem, and fatigue. Although there is no basis for hypothesizing plaintiffs to be healthier than the general population, plaintiffs rated their pre-injury functioning superior to non-plaintiffs. These findings suggest that response biases need to be taken into account by forensic examiners when relying on litigants' self-reports of pre-injury status.

Adult↗

A cross-sectional study correlating degeneration of the cervical spine with disability and pain in United kingdom patients.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted. OBJECTIVE: To determine the relation between degeneration of all the joints in the cervical spine, and to identify the effects of litigation on pain and disability levels in trauma and nontrauma patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The link between spinal degeneration and patient symptoms remains controversial. Two recent similar studies present conflicting results concerning the association between spinal degeneration and symptomatology. These two studies, performed in different countries, did not consider the impact of impending litigation on self-reported pain and disability levels. The role of the uncovertebral and facet articulations has hitherto not been investigated. METHODS: Radiographic and questionnaire data from 180 consecutive patients with neck pain were collected. Neck pain severity was measured using two time-dependent scales. All patients completed the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and questions about chronicity, etiology, and associated litigation. The radiographs were evaluated for the number of levels of degeneration and the severity of degeneration in the discs as well as the uncovertebral and facet articulations. RESULTS: In this study, 71 patients (40.57%) reported neck pain as a result of injury. However, only 5.1% had associated litigation. There was no statistically significant difference in pain severity or disability levels between the patients with and those without cervical degeneration. According to the findings, the number of levels of cervical degeneration and the severity of degeneration in the discs, facets, and uncovertebral joints are not related to the levels of pain and disability. Patients reporting neck pain caused by injury had a tendency (P = 0.055) to more pain during the preceding week and significantly more disability (P < 0.001). Significant differences included pain intensity (P < 0.025), reading (P < 0.001), headaches (P < 0.025), ability to drive (P < 0.01), and concentration (P < 0.01). Women reported significantly more pain (P < 0.01) and disability (P < 0.001) than men, but did not have more degeneration in any of the joints. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with neck pain, there is no difference in reported pain and disability levels between those with and those without evidence of cervical spine degeneration. Patients whose neck pain is the result of trauma report significantly more pain and disability than nontrauma patients. This is not because of more spinal degeneration or overriding litigation issues.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Lawsuits and secondhand smoke.

OBJECTIVE: This paper describes secondhand smoke (SHS) litigation over the past quarter century where non-smoking litigants have prevailed and attempts to decipher trends in the law that may impact the course of future cases. METHODS: Since the early 1980s, the author has sought and examined legal cases in which SHS exposure is an important factor. Law library searches using the official reporter system (for example, Shimp v. New Jersey Bell Telephone Co., 368 A.2d 408) have more recently been combined with computerised online searches using LexisNexis and Westlaw. The author has learned of other cases through personal correspondence and from articles in newspapers. Over 420 cases involving exposure to SHS were identified. Each case was reviewed and summarised. RESULTS: Since 1976, the year of the first reported SHS lawsuit, this type of litigation has increased both in number and in scope with increasing success. While it is common for initial cases to lose in a new area where the law eventually evolves, litigants and their lawyers who later bring similar cases can learn from those previous, unsuccessful cases. It is now apparent that the judicial branch has begun to recognise the need to protect the public-especially some of the most vulnerable members of our society-from the serious threat to their health that is exposure to SHS. CONCLUSIONS: Successful cases brought on behalf of individuals exposed to SHS produce an additional benefit for the public health by both paving the way for other non-smoking litigants to succeed in their cases and persuading business owners and others voluntarily to make their facilities 100% smoke-free.

Adult↗

Vaccine adverse event reporting system reporting source: a possible source of bias in longitudinal studies.

OBJECTIVE: The US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is a passive reporting system to which anyone can report an event. Publicity related to potential adverse events may change reporting patterns. The objective of this paper is to show how litigation-related reports have influenced the trends in possible adverse event reports to VAERS. METHODS: The VAERS public-use data files were downloaded in July 2004 and translated into identical SAS data sets for analysis. Cases that were related to litigation were identified using a word search algorithm. All cases for the most frequently reported symptoms in litigation (overdose, neuropathy, autism, "mental retardation," arthralgia, and "speech disorder") were reviewed. RESULTS: In recent years, most case reports to VAERS that were related to overdose, neuropathy, and thimerosal were related to litigation. Many cases that were related to autism and mental retardation were as well. CONCLUSIONS: This review shows a previously undisclosed rise in the number of reports to the VAERS related to pending litigation for vaccine injury. The implications of this for understanding longitudinal reporting patterns are discussed.

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems↗

Do the elderly sue physicians?

We reviewed malpractice data from the state of Wisconsin for 1983 and 1984 to determine the frequency and the outcome of malpractice litigation by the elderly. Research data were obtained from court dockets filed with Wisconsin's Patients Compensation Panel and from 281 attorneys who provided the age for 431 claimants. The results showed that 10.0% of malpractice suits in Wisconsin were filed by the elderly during the study years. When we compared the frequency of litigation with the use of the health care system (number of hospitalizations and inpatient days), the elderly were significantly less likely than younger persons to initiate malpractice litigation despite greater exposure to potential negligence. However, once a malpractice suit was filed, there was no significant difference between older and younger litigants in the disposition of the case or in the likelihood of being the prevailing party when a finding or award was made. These findings suggest that the elderly are less likely to file malpractice claims against health care providers than would be expected given their use of the health care system. This finding may be related to social, economic, and legal barriers to malpractice litigation by older adults.

Adult↗

The law and congenital malformations.

In 1967, I indicated that the number of lawsuits involving malformed infants seemed to be increasing, not realizing that the increase was foretelling an epidemic. The reasons for this epidemic are described in this paper and are due to attitudes and happenings in the medical, legal, and lay sectors of our society. Case histories have been used to demonstrate that the litigation process can produce pain and suffering. The case histories also indicate that, when the members of family become orchestrated by a lawyer into the position of devoting a great deal of their energy to litigation, many high priority family responsibilities are ignored and important ethical standards are distorted. To win at all costs may be good for a football team, but it is obviously bad for a family. We must take drastic changes in the method of supporting the victims of disease and injury so that litigation is no longer necessary to compensate and support patients and families, whether negligence is or is not a factor. Recommendations for diminishing the malpractice crises include: education of the patient about the consequences of the litigation process--that only a small portion of the malpractice premium dollar ever reaches the patient and that most human malformations are not produced by medical negligence, altering the deteriorating image of the physician, reversing the increase in irresponsible medical expert testimony and changing the laws pertaining to medical licensure and loss of medical licensure, improving the health care system, making the awards more realistic by taking into consideration community and insurance resources of the patient and by eliminating lump sum awards and "punitive" awards, decreasing lawyer representation in legislative bodies so that legal reforms will become a possibility, and eliminating the contingency fee system by replacing it either with legal insurance so that the attorney is working for the patient or by adopting no-fault malpractice insurance with binding arbitration so that the negligently injured patient is compensated properly. The process of litigation rarely solves the patient's problems and frequently develops into a disease all its own.

Congenital Abnormalities↗

Medical malpractice and facial nerve paralysis.

BACKGROUND: Iatrogenic facial nerve paralysis is a devastating surgical complication that occasionally results in litigation. OBJECTIVE: To analyze litigation trends to better understand the causes and outcomes of suits involving facial nerve paralysis to prevent future litigation and improve physician education. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: All US civil trials. PARTICIPANTS: All state and federal civil trials alleging malpractice and facial nerve paralysis were reviewed. METHODS: Jury verdict reviews from January 1, 1985, to December 31, 2000, were obtained from a computerized legal database and analyzed. Reviews compile data on defendants, plaintiffs, allegations of wrong doing, and expert witness specialties, and provide case summaries. Fifty-three cases from 19 of the 50 states were obtained. Data were entered into a spreadsheet for analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Verdicts and indemnity payments. RESULTS: Suits reviewed were as follows: cosmetic, 12 (23%); otologic, 13 (25%); nonneoplastic disease of the parotid or other benign conditions of the head and neck, 15 (28%); benign neoplasms of the parotid, 9 (17%); malignant neoplasms of the parotid, 1 (2%); and temporomandibular joint operations, 3 (6%) (percentages do not total 100 because of rounding). Allegations of negligence were frequently multiple and included lack of informed consent (16 [30%] of 53), failure to diagnose (10 [19%] of 53), and surgical misadventures (47 [89%] of 53). Excluding failure to obtain consent or to diagnose, 28 suits still alleged negligence based solely on a surgical misadventure. Of these suits, 12 (63%) resulted in plaintiff awards. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons must emphasize and document the likelihood and consequences of this devastating complication to all patients undergoing surgery in this area. Risk management goals include a thorough and timely examination and careful and thoughtful surgical approaches. However, patient rapport and bedside manner may be the only protection the surgeon has from litigation arising from this complication.

Adult↗

Self-perception of the elective surgeon and some patient perception correlates.

This study investigated the personality characteristics of the elective surgeon, the realism of the surgeon's role concept, and the relationships between these variables and the occurrence of litigation. Data obtained from 125 surgeons and 65 of these surgeons' patients were computer analyzed to answer three specific questions. The surgeon's personality needs were found to differ significantly from those of the general population. Both the surgeons and the patients viewed the surgeon's role unrealistically. No specific physician-patient interaction variable was found to be related significantly to the occurrence of litigation. Findings showed that the elective surgeon is aware of the documented causes for litigation but unaware of how his own personality may affect his vulnerability to litigation.

Adult↗

Medical malpractice and the thyroid gland.

BACKGROUND: A medical malpractice litigation "crisis" exists in this country. Analyzing litigation trends through verdict summaries may help understand causes. METHODS: Jury verdict reviews from 1987-2000 were obtained from a computerized database. Reviews compile data on defendants, plaintiffs, allegations of wrongdoing, and verdict summaries. RESULTS: Thirty suits from nine states occurred. Plaintiffs were women in 80% of the cases, with a median age of 41. Fifty percent of patients (15 of 30) had a bad outcome, (9 of 30 dead, 4 of 30 with neurologic deficits, 1 blind, and 1 alive with cancer). Thirty percent alleged surgical complications, mostly recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, and 75% of cancer patients alleged a delay, either through falsely negative biopsies or no biopsy taken. Respiratory events occurred in 43% and frequently resulted in large awards. CONCLUSIONS: The liberal use of fine-needle aspiration and documentation of surgical risks may help reduce litigation. Complications and bad outcomes do not indicate negligence. Analysis may contribute to risk management strategies or litigation reform.

Age Distribution↗

Compensation, pain complaints, and psychological disturbance.

This study compared 47 patients with chronic low back pain who were involved in personal injury litigation with 33 patients not seeking compensation who were also complaining of low back pain. Pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale and the adjectival check-list of the McGill Pain Questionnaire. Psychological state was assessed using the Zung Depression Scale, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, the Eysenck Personality Inventory and the Hostility and Direction of Hostility Questionnaire. The group involved in litigation contained significantly more males, and the duration of pain was significantly less. The mean age of the 'compensation' group was less than that of the 'no compensation' group, but this did not reach statistical significance at the 5% level. There was no difference between the two groups on ratings of pain severity or pain description, and no difference on measures of psychological disturbance. Both groups had significant elevations of mean depression, neuroticism, state anxiety and trait anxiety scores when compared with the normal population. It was concluded that there is no support for the claim that personal injury litigants describe their pain as more severe than do non-litigants, and that both groups show similar levels of psychological disturbance.

Adolescent↗

Cardiotocography and medicolegal issues.

Obstetric litigation is on the increase. A review of litigation cases reveals that the majority of claims relating to the intrapartum period arise because the cardiotocograph- (CTG) was misinterpreted or because inappropriate action was taken in the presence of fetal heart rate abnormalities. Compulsory education and training in the interpretation of CTGs and in best practice are key factors in minimizing the threat of litigation. Newer methods, such as pulse oximetry or fetal electrocardiogram waveform analysis, can act as adjuncts to CTG and help to avoid birth asphyxia and hence litigation.

Asphyxia Neonatorum↗

Medicolegal aspects of athletic head injury.

This article reviews the legal aspects of head injuries resulting from a variety of athletic activities, focusing primarily on head and brain injuries resulting from the playing of football, boxing, horseback riding, winter sports (hockey and skiing), and soccer. Part 1 give a general overview of the occurrence of head injuries in athletics and the potential for litigation. Part 2 reviews the history of and increase in sports injury litigation, as well as resulting changes in the law. In Part 3, the current status of athletic head injury litigation, the parties involved, types of claims brought, and viable defenses are discussed. Finally, Part 4 reviews different ways to reduce athletic head injury litigation through better equipment design and adequate warning and instructions for users and coaches.

Athletic Injuries↗

Clinical practice guidelines for pressure ulcer prevention can prevent malpractice lawsuits in older patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of implementation of and compliance with practice guidelines for pressure ulcer (PU) prevention using medical malpractice litigation data. SETTING AND SUBJECTS: Forty-nine plaintiffs whose respective compensations ($14,418,770 in 35 plaintiffs) or dismissals had been reported in 2 legal databases. PU verdicts and settlements for plaintiffs 60 years of age and older were evaluated using the American Geriatric Society's Clinical Practice Guidelines, "Pressure Ulcers in Adults: Prediction and Prevention." METHODS: Litigation analysis was used to identify the effect, implementation of, and compliance with PU prevention practice guidelines on malpractice awards in PU lawsuits. Data were obtained using fact patterns from 2 legal databases, LEXIS and WESTLAW. Potential decreases in plaintiff awards and prevention of disability were calculated assuming that health care defendants had modified their behavior to conform to the practice guidelines. Possible increases in defendant awards were used to estimate the added risks to health care professionals of adopting these guidelines as the standard of care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Projected changes in verdicts, monetary awards expressed in dollars, and disability score. RESULTS: Had health care defendants followed these guidelines, $11,389,989 might have been saved in 20 lawsuits. Violations of guidelines appeared to "cluster" together, with many plaintiffs alleging breeches of several interrelated guidelines. It appears that improving the level of care required to remedy 1 guideline variation could improve the outcomes for the entire cluster. In contrast, the use of the guidelines in court as the standard of care against defendant health care professionals might have contributed to changing only 4 of 14 defense verdicts. CONCLUSIONS: Use of clinical pathways in these settings can benefit both caregivers and patients by favorably modifying preventive practice patterns while decreasing vulnerability to litigation. Conversely, the continuing threat of fault-based litigation against substandard practitioners and facilities provides an ongoing safeguard of patient rights and reduces the risk of subsequent disability.

Aged↗