Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Universal Health Insurance”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,495 records · Page 83Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

Sarcoidosis severity and socioeconomic status.

Several chronic diseases are more severe in persons who are Black, of low socioeconomic status (SES), and underinsured. The authors ask if this is true for sarcoidosis. Associations among sarcoidosis disease severity, SES, insurance coverage, and functional limitations were analysed. Back and White sarcoidosis patients (n=110) of a municipal and university hospital sarcoidosis registry were interviewed by telephone. Data on disease severity were abstracted from patient charts. Most patients reported good or excellent health by demographic characteristics. Low SES and no or public insurance were associated with worse health status and more severe dyspnoea. More advanced radiographic stage was associated with lower income, and forced vital capacity impairment with less education. Physical and social activity limitations due to physical and emotional disability were related to no or public insurance and lower income, but not education. Sarcoidosis severity is associated with socioeconomic status and insurance indicators; no or public insurance and low income are associated with functional limitations. Sarcoidosis-associated limitations are substantial, emphasizing the social significance of sarcoidosis. Lack of private insurance may inhibit the use of medical care, contributing to disease severity and impairment.

Black or African American↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Rationing medical care.

Recent proposals to reform the health care financing system have sparked discussions concerning the need to ration health care. Relative to other western industrialized democracies, the US rations primary and preventive care more, tertiary care less, and makes greater use of price rationing and bureaucratic controls. Because insurance coverage is not universal and the extent of coverage varies across services, the poor and those patients needing long-term care are most heavily affected by price rationing. The current system also works to the advantage of procedure-oriented specialists and to the disadvantage of primary care physicians. Major reform of health care financing could change what is rationed, how it is rationed, and who is most affected. However, some rationing will remain necessary under any conceivable financing system.

Canada↗
PubMed1980

Consumer-centered vs. job-centered health insurance.

Today's dominant health care financing system blocks economic competition and rewards doctors and hospitals for cost-increasing behavior. The author believes that the most effective and acceptable way to get health care costs under control, and at the same time achieve universal coverage, would be through a system of fair economic competition. He discusses his Consumer Choice Health Plan proposal and describes how one of the main barriers to competition is today's system of job-linked health insurance.

Community Participation↗
PubMed2004

[Urological specialist opinion in medical law].

The role of specialist opinion in medical law (medical standards and the determination of due care) is discussed. The mandator is usually a court of law or an arbitral committee of the general medical council. In comparison to other countries, a specialist opinion is judicially ordered. An increase in the number of patient accusations against the medical practitioner must be shown. The form and preconditions for a urological specialist opinion in medical law are given. The requirements for the specialist are comprehendability, readiness to give objective answers to the questions presented as well as careful research into the development of the illness. Reference is also made to the responsibility of teaching hospitals to provide education on producing a specialist opinion within the framework of specialist training. An overview of the common complications in the diagnosis and therapy of typical urological illnesses, which could lead to medical disputes, is presented. Important sources of error, as well as contravention of the clarification and counselling responsibilities, are presented synoptically.

Curriculum↗
PubMed2006

Outcomes research collaborations between third-party payers, academia, and pharmaceutical manufacturers: What can we learn from clinical research?

Research collaborations between academic researchers, regulatory agencies, and pharmaceutical manufacturers have made the drug development process more efficient and have frequently supported the successful documentation of quality, safety, and efficacy of pharmaceuticals (the so-called three hurdles). Over recent years issues of drug cost, access, and utilization have moved to center stage, giving rise to a "fourth hurdle approval" process by third-party payers. This requires new forms of collaborative research among new players. This contribution highlights the need for a "triangular" relationship in the field of outcomes research between scientists in academia, third-party payer institutions, and pharmaceutical manufacturers. We discuss, and illustrate by case studies, how successful models of collaboration from the drug development process might be relevant to research activities related to the fourth hurdle. Case studies which may provide useful models for collaborative outcomes research include the "International Conference on Harmonization" process, the voluntary consultation procedures established by drug regulatory agencies, and the Quebec experience in database sharing.

Biomedical Research↗
PubMed2000

Results of provider self-adjudication using the prudent layperson standard compared with the managed care organization's emergency department claim review process.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: We compare the results of a provider "self-adjudicating" outpatient emergency department claims using a "presenting symptom-based" system with the managed care organization (MCO) adjudicating the claims using a "final diagnosis-based" system. METHODS: All outpatient visits from one MCO to an urban, university hospital between January 1, 1998, and February 28, 1999, were included. Each record was reviewed by 2 methods to determine whether the visit qualified for payment under the MCO's benefit structure. Under the provider adjudication, symptom-based system, all visits with nursing triage levels of immediate/emergency were approved automatically. Those with triage levels of delayed/nonurgent were reviewed by an emergency physician and approved if, in the physician's opinion, the presenting symptoms met the emergency criteria under the District of Columbia's Access to Emergency Services Act. A second claims review, blinded to the first, was performed with the diagnosis-based system used by the MCO before approval of the prudent layperson standard. This review divided the records into "approve," "deny," and "suspend" categories according to the discharge International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision code. The results of the 2 reviews were compared. RESULTS: We reviewed 1,830 records; 836 (46%) cases were triaged as immediate/emergency and 994 (54%) as delayed/nonurgent. Of the 994 delayed/nonurgent visits, physician review determined that 607 (61%) met the prudent layperson standard and 387 (39%) did not. Overall, the provider self-adjudication system determined that 1,443 (78.8%) of the 1,830 visits should be approved for insurance coverage. The MCO's system approved 966 (53%), denied 335 (18%), and suspended 529 (29%). Provider self-adjudication using a symptom-based system resulted in the immediate approval of 1,443 (77.8%) visits compared with 966 (52.7%) by a diagnosis-based system (P <.001). Excluding the 529 suspended claims, McNemar's statistical testing of 1,302 records failed to demonstrate the equivalence of the 2 systems (P <. 001). CONCLUSION: Compared with the standard ED claims review process used by the managed care industry, provider self-adjudication using a symptom-based system approves a greater proportion of visits, avoids rejection of many ED visits, and identifies many nonemergency visits that mistakenly appear to be emergencies. The possibility of providers and MCOs working together to adjudicate outpatient ED claims should be explored.

Ambulatory Care↗
PubMed2004

Prospective study of clinician-entered research data in the Emergency Department using an Internet-based system after the HIPAA Privacy Rule.

BACKGROUND: Design and test the reliability of a web-based system for multicenter, real-time collection of data in the emergency department (ED), under waiver of authorization, in compliance with HIPAA. METHODS: This was a phase I, two-hospital study of patients undergoing evaluation for possible pulmonary embolism. Data were collected by on-duty clinicians on an HTML data collection form (prospective e-form), populated using either a personal digital assistant (PDA) or personal computer (PC). Data forms were uploaded to a central, offsite server using secure socket protocol transfer. Each form was assigned a unique identifier, and all PHI data were encrypted, but were password-accessible by authorized research personnel to complete a follow-up e-form. RESULTS: From April 15, 2003-April 15 2004, 1022 prospective e-forms and 605 follow-up e-forms were uploaded. Complexities of PDA use compelled clinicians to use PCs in the ED for data entry for most forms. No data were lost and server log query revealed no unauthorized entry. Prospectively obtained PHI data, encrypted upon server upload, were successfully decrypted using password-protected access to allow follow-up without difficulty in 605 cases. Non-PHI data from prospective and follow-up forms were available to the study investigators via standard file transfer protocol. CONCLUSIONS: Data can be accurately collected from on-duty clinicians in the ED using real-time, PC-Internet data entry in compliance with the Privacy Rule. Deidentification-reidentification of PHI was successfully accomplished by a password-protected encryption-deencryption mechanism to permit follow-up by approved research personnel.

Computer Security↗
PubMed1999

Hospital length of stay in the United States and Japan: a case study of myocardial infarction patients.

Patients in Japan stay in the hospital significantly longer than those in the United States. This study investigates factors that may account for the difference from a sociocultural perspective. In an intensive case study on patients with uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction at a university hospital in Japan and its U.S. counterpart, the authors collected data from interviews with patients, their families, physicians, and other medical professionals and from medical, nursing, and billing records. Patients with comparable medical conditions were studied; U.S. patients stayed in the hospital for 8.8 days on average, Japanese patients for 25.0 days. The average total charge of hospitalization was 2.3 times higher in the United States than in Japan. Although length of stay is determined mainly by physicians' clinical judgment and by health care system factors, patients and their family members often actively participate in decision-making about discharge dates. This case study approach revealed how different health care systems manifest themselves in the individual patient's course of illness, which cannot be examined by macro-level comparison of nations' health care systems.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

State eligibility rules under separate state SCHIP programs--implications for children's access to health care.

This Policy Brief is the fourth in a series of reports issued by the George Washington University Center for Health Services Research and Policy that examine the design of separately-administered State Children's Health Insurance Programs (SCHIP) that is, programs that operate directly under the authority of the federal SCHIP statute rather than expansions of state Medicaid programs. These Policy Briefs also consider the implications of states' design choices for children's access to health care. The first three briefs in this series focused on three aspects of separate SCHIP programs: children's legal right to assistance under separate programs; benefit and coverage design choices under SCHIP plans; and the design and structure of freestanding managed care contracts negotiated by SCHIP agencies. This issue brief focuses on how financial eligibility for SCHIP actually is calculated, that is, the formulas that states have developed to count children's family income for purposes of measuring eligibility. This topic is of central importance to overall program administration because of the federal legal prohibition against assistance to targeted low-income children who are in fact Medicaid-eligible. This prohibition on duplication of assistance was a crucial assumption in the enactment of SCHIP. It is also key to the conservation of limited SCHIP funding for targeted low-income children who are ineligible for either Medicaid or any other form of health insurance, particularly as unemployment rises and the number of lower income children without health insurance may be poised to increase.

Child↗
PubMed1998

Children's health insurance programs: strategies for outreach and enrollment.

In tandem with Medicaid, the State Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) could cover most of the 11 million uninsured children in the United States. Nearly half of children without insurance are eligible for existing Medicaid programs, and an estimated 4 million more will be eligible under new CHIP rules. The key to moving toward universal coverage for children is outreach--making sure that every child who qualifies for the programs gains access to them. This issue of States of Health discusses some of the most effective strategies for achieving that goal.

Child↗
PubMed1990

US health care policy in 1990: looking back, looking ahead.

Health policy in the United States is best understood as a policy of incrementalism with major interventions occurring only in response to crisis, as in the case of the Medicare legislation that profoundly altered our historic financing of health care. The characteristically minor, unplanned, adjustments that are made often have major unanticipated consequences, and these serve to explain the radical transformation of the nation's health system in the half-century since World War II. The main elements in this change--the evolution of employment-tied private insurance for the majority of the population, the predominance of specialism and superspecialism in medical practice, the expansion of the voluntary hospital system with capital liberally raised through tax-exempt bond issues, advancing technology and medical capability are reviewed. The major persistent policy issues--uncontrolled expenditures and the increasing numbers of uninsured--will ultimately precipitate change, perhaps by the end of the decade, very likely a minimum benefit, universal federal-state insurance system, supplemented by the private market--hardly radical systemic reform.

Forecasting↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Employment-based health insurance: past, present, and future.

We review the rise, stabilization, and decline of employment-based insurance; discuss its transformation from quasi-social insurance to a system based on actuarial principles; and suggest that the presence of Medicare and Medicaid has weakened political pressure for universal coverage. We highlight employment-based insurance's flaws: high administrative costs, inequitable sharing of costs, inability to cover large segments of the population, contribution to labor-management strife, and the inability of employers to act collectively to make health care more cost-effective. We conclude with scenarios for possible trajectories: employment-based insurance flourishes, continues to erode, or is replaced by a more comprehensive system.

Cost Allocation↗
PubMed2005

Comparing the validity of different sources of information on emergency department visits: a latent class analysis.

BACKGROUND: Emergency department (ED) use in Quebec may be measured from varied sources, eg, patient's self-reports, hospital medical charts, and provincial health insurance claims databases. Determining the relative validity of each source is complicated because none is a gold standard. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the validity of different measures of ED use without arbitrarily assuming one is perfect. SUBJECTS: Data were obtained from a nursing liaison intervention study for frail seniors visiting EDs at 4 university-affiliated hospitals in Montreal. MEASURES: The number of ED visits during 2 consecutive follow-up periods of 1 and 4 months after baseline was obtained from patient interviews, from medical charts of participating hospitals, and from the provincial health insurance claims database. METHODS: Latent class analysis was used to estimate the validity of each source. The impact of the following covariates on validity was evaluated: hospital visited, patient's demographic/clinical characteristics, risk of functional decline, nursing liaison intervention, duration of recall, previous ED use, and previous hospitalization. RESULTS: The patient's self-report was found to be the least accurate (sensitivity: 70%, specificity: 88%). Claims databases had the greatest validity, especially after defining claims made on consecutive days as part of the same ED visit (sensitivity: 98%, specificity: 98%). The validity of the medical chart was intermediate. Lower sensitivity (or under-reporting) on the self-report appeared to be associated with higher age, low comorbidity and shorter length of recall. CONCLUSION: The claims database is the most valid method of measuring ED use among seniors in Quebec compared with hospital medical charts and patient-reported use.

Aged↗
PubMed1995

The rise and fall of democratic universalism: health care reform in Italy, 1978-1994.

In 1978, a sweeping reform created the first national health service of continental Europe: Italy's Servizio Sanitario Nazionale. This new scheme was based on the principle of "full democratic universalism": The state would provide free and equal benefits to every citizen and the organization of public health would subject to popular control, essentially through political parties. However, the severe problems encountered in implementing the reform design and rapidly increasing health expenditures soon eroded any consensus on this principle. Thus the 1980s and early 1990s witnessed a gradual shift to "conditional and well managed universalism." These latter principles stress the need to differentiate access to care according to some criterion to regulate demand and the need for efficient use of scarce resources through adequate valorization of managerial skills and the use of "market-type" incentives. An elaborated system of user copayments was introduced gradually, and in 1992 a "reform of the reform" profoundly changed the organizational framework of the Servizio Sanitario Nazionale. The new government elected in the spring of 1994 announced ambitious plans to partially dismantle public universal insurance. Although these plans may prove difficult, the potential to form an anti-universalistic coalition seems strong in the contemporary Italian health care arena.

Cost Control↗