Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Learning Disabilities”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,495 records · Page 83Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

EPA2000: a multilingual, programmable computer assessment of off-line metacognition in children with mathematical-learning disabilities.

EPA2000 is a program for the assessment of off-line measured metacognitive skills and arithmetical performances in primary school children with mathematical-learning disabilities. The program is designed as a script engine. The concept makes it possible to modify and translate the test into different languages without reprogramming. A user-friendly script editor is built-in, with which all of the parameters of the test can be modified and translated in different languages.

Child↗
PubMed1994

A behavioural approach to retraining bowel function after long-standing constipation and faecal impaction in people with learning disabilities.

The authors describe a behavioural programme--involving prompted toilet-sitting after meals, rewards for appropriate evacuation and increased fibre--for four people with severe learning disabilities. Although treatment times were long, such training resulted in near-normal bowel function. While this behavioural approach does not ignore the biological aspects of the problem, soiling in intellectually disabled people should not be attributed to the handicapping condition alone. Training at an earlier age should be considered.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Integrated learning: explicit strategies and their role in problem-solving instruction for students with learning disabilities.

This study investigated the effectiveness of an explicit strategy as a means of linking facts, concepts, and problem solving in an unfamiliar domain of learning. Participants were 37 secondary students with learning disabilities. All students were taught health facts and concepts, which they then applied to problem-solving exercises presented through computer-simulation games. Students in the experimental group were taught an explicit strategy for solving the problems; the comparison group was given supportive feedback and encouraged to induce their own strategies. The explicit strategy group performed significantly better on two transfer measures, including videotaped problem-solving exercises.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Social competence and problem behavior of adolescent girls with learning disabilities.

Estimates of social competence and problem behavior were obtained using the Child Behavior Checklist (Achenbach & Edelbrock, 1983) for a sample of 51 adolescent girls with learning disabilities. Results identified poor social competence and elevated problem behaviors, in comparison to a normative group of nonhandicapped adolescents. Implications for both diagnosis and research are addressed.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Listening comprehension and recall abilities in adolescents with language-learning disabilities and without disabilities for social studies lectures.

Listening comprehension and recall abilities for social studies lectures were examined and compared in 20 adolescent males with language-learning disabilities (LLD) and 29 without disabilities (WD). Subjects viewed two social studies lectures with comparison and causation expository discourse structures and verbally responded to literal and inferential comprehension questions. Regardless of lecture type or question type, the group with LLD performed significantly more poorly than did the group WD. Both groups responded accurately to significantly more inferential questions for the causation lecture over the comparison lecture. Neither group demonstrated a significant difference with respect to their response accuracy for the literal questions across lecture types.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1989

Improving learning disabled students' skills at composing essays: self-instructional strategy training.

This study was conducted to determine if self-instructional strategy training would improve learning disabled students' writing. Students were taught a strategy designed to facilitate the generation, framing, and planning of argumentative essays. Training effects were investigated using a multiple-baseline across-subjects design, with multiple probes in baseline. Strategy instruction had a positive effect on students' writing performance and self-efficacy. Effects were maintained over time and transferred to a new setting and teacher. Evidence for generalization to a second genre, story writing, was also obtained. The students and their special education teacher recommended the use of the strategy with other students.

Child↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Auditory brainstem response, middle latency response, and late cortical evoked potentials in children with learning disabilities.

Auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) and behavioral tests were used to evaluate auditory processing in 10 children aged 7 to 11 years who were diagnosed as learning disabled (LD). AEPs included auditory brainstem responses (ABRs), middle latency responses (MLRs), and late cortical responses (P1, N1, P2, P3). Late cortical responses were recorded using an active listening oddball procedure. Auditory processing disorders were suspected in the LD children after a psychologist found phonologic processing and auditory memory problems. A control group of 10 age- and gender-matched children with no hearing or reported learning difficulties was also tested. Teacher ratings of classroom listening and SCAN Competing Words and Staggered Spondaic Word scores were poorer in the LD children. There were minor ABR latency differences between the two groups. Wave Na of the MLR was later and Nb was smaller in the LD group. The main differences in cortical responses were that P1 was earlier and P3 was later and smaller in the LD group.

Auditory Perceptual Disorders↗
PubMed1984

Accuracy versus speed in the generalized effort of learning-disabled children.

Reinforcement of effortful performance in a given academic task has been found to increase the subsequent performance of other academic tasks. The learned-effort hypothesis assumes that individuals learn which dimensions of task performance are correlated with reinforcement of high effort, and generalize across tasks. Therefore, reinforcement of increased effort in a given dimension of one task should result in greater generalized effort in the same dimension of transfer performance than in another dimension. In accord with this view, preadolescent learning-disabled students who received points for high reading accuracy subsequently produced more accurate drawings and stories than did students whose points had been based upon high reading speed or upon mere completion of the reading task. Students who received points for high reading speed subsequently constructed stories more quickly than did children whose points had been based upon high reading accuracy or upon reading-task completion. Consistent with the more explicit and frequent feedback for accuracy than for speed in most academic tasks, generalized accuracy was much more durable than generalized speed.

Child↗
PubMed1989

The effects of daily homework assignments on the acquisition of basic skills by students with learning disabilities.

Examined in this two-study investigation was the effectiveness of supplemental homework assignments on the acquisition of basic skills by students with diagnosed learning disabilities (LD). In Experiment 1, an adapted alternating treatments design was used to investigate the efficacy of unstructured homework assignments with 6 elementary school-aged students having basic math problems. Although the impact of the homework assignments differed across students, three factors maximized the effectiveness of the homework assignments: rate of homework completion, percentage correct on the homework assignments, and the rate of acquisition of the content being presented. Experiment 2, designed to formally test the effectiveness of homework assignments structured specifically to address these identified factors, confirmed that homework can be employed to increase the effectiveness of direct instruction sequences with students diagnosed as LD.

Child↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Psychosocial dimensions of learning disabilities: external validation and relationship with age and academic functioning.

This study was designed to assess the following in a group of 152 children with learning disabilities between the ages of 7 and 13 years: (a) the relationships between age and psychosocial functioning: (b) the relationships among psychosocial functioning, cognitive abilities, and academic achievement; and (c) the external validity of statistically derived psychosocial subtypes. Participants were assigned to one of seven psychosocial subtypes on the basis of a profile-matching algorithm. Overall, the findings suggested no increase in psychopathology with advancing age. In addition, clear relationships were found between academic achievement patterns and personality subtypes. Finally, the subtypes could be distinguished on the basis of a behavior problem checklist not used for the construction of the subtypes.

Achievement↗
PubMed1997

Fundamental gross motor skill performance by girls and boys with learning disabilities.

The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of fundamental gross motor skills by 10 girls and 10 boys, 7 yr. old, with learning disabilities. Their skills were assessed on the Test of Gross Motor Development. The boys achieved significantly higher mean scores than the girls on the subtests of Locomotor Skills and Object Control Skills, and on the Gross Motor Development Quotient.

Child↗
PubMed1997

The child with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and learning disability.

The following case is presented to demonstrate the difficulties associated with treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) when it is comorbid with a learning disability (LD). These two disorders exist simultaneously in about 30% of those diagnosed with ADHD. It is often difficult to separate the effects of one condition from those of the other. Researchers and clinicians often struggle with questions concerning the origin of inattentive symptoms. A child with LD may have trouble attending if placed in a classroom setting not designed to deal with issues related to LD, while a child with attention deficit may not be progressing as well as expected because of problems maintaining attention. This case highlights the need for a multi-faceted approach to the treatment of ADHD, as well as, the need for continued evaluation of the effectiveness of the treatment plan instituted.

Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity↗
PubMed1997

Reliability of theory of mind task performance by individuals with a learning disability: a research note.

The aim of the present study was to test the reliability of theory of mind task performance by individuals with a learning disability. Across a series of three false belief tasks and two belief-desire reasoning tasks reliability was moderate--although it was no lower than has been found over a period of 3 weeks in normally developing children. The overall level of performance on the tasks was also only moderate, with approximately half the subjects passing on any one false belief task, and one quarter on any one belief-desire reasoning task. Reliable passers had higher VMA and NVMA than unreliable passers and subjects who failed. Given the important interpretations made regarding the representational skills of individuals on the basis of their responses in such experimental tasks, further work investigating the psychometric properties of the tasks is required with both typically and atypically developing individuals.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The identification of high-school dropouts identified as learning disabled: evaluating the utility of a discriminant analysis function.

This study examined the utility of a linear discriminant function to distinguish between students identified as learning disabled (LD) who had either been released from high school under codes suggestive of school dropout (n = 213) or graduation (n = 92). The discriminant function was comprised of six variables--student ethnicity, reading ability, family intactness, family socioeconomic status, school transfers, and school-initiated interruptions. The analysis determined that differences between the LD dropout sample and LD graduate sample were sufficient to allow for a discrimination between the groups. On the basis of group differences the discriminant function that was constructed correctly classified 83% of the school dropouts and 46% of the school graduates, for an overall 73% accuracy rate. Those factors contributing most to the function were the number of district-initiated interruptions, school transfers, and family intactness. Based on the findings, implications for school districts and future research are noted.

Achievement↗
PubMed1986

Controversial approaches to treating learning disabilities and attention deficit disorder.

It is estimated that between 3% and 7% of children and adolescents in this country--up to 4 million--are learning disabled. Of this group, about 20% also have attention deficit disorder. Many professionals in multiple disciplines have proposed treatment approaches. When research has been done to support the approach, the reports and data may be published in journals not normally read by the practicing physician. When research data are not available, the information may be in a popular book, newspapers, or lay magazines or on television. Thus, parents may know of ideas and suggestions before the professional in clinical practice. These acceptable and controversial approaches to treatment are reviewed. It is understandable that a parent would seek out improved ways of helping his or her child. I reviewed the significant literature in an effort to assist the practicing physician in providing appropriate parental guidance and clinical interventions.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1980

Coding processes in normal and learning-disabled children: evidence for modality-specific pathways to the cognitive system.

In Experiment 1, normal 10-yr.-olds and 10-yr.-olds diagnosed as learning disabled (LD) were presented with items in visual and auditory modalities for free and cued recall. The LD children had deficits in auditory and/or visual memory. Recall by LD children was worse than for nonimpaired peers only on tasks in the impaired modality, and on cued recall the deficit was confined to recall given a semantic category cue: Recall given perceptual cues was unimpaired. In Experiment 2, presentation-time tasks were used to create a bias toward either perceptual or semantic encoding. The semantic-encoding task removed the modality-specific deficit between LD children and controls. We conclude that deficits in semantically cued recall for children with only one impaired modality had their origins at presentation time. The most parsimonious explanation of these results involves separate pathways linking the auditory and visual modalities to the semantic system.

Child↗
PubMed1995

Educating children with learning disabilities in Foxfire classrooms.

Because every classroom in American schools contains heterogeneous groups of students, inclusion is more than an issue of concern just for special educators. This article provides examples of elementary classrooms that have adopted the Foxfire approach to instruction as a means of developing learning communities that serve all children. The teachers who are described turned to learner-centered instruction not as a method to promote the inclusion of children with learning disabilities, but, rather, as a means of providing optimal learning experiences for all their students. The rationale for developing elementary classrooms that are learner-centered communities is explored, and specific examples of instructional approaches are provided.

Child↗
PubMed1985

Auditory-successive selective attention for learning disabled and normal boys.

Improvement in auditory-successive selective attention was noted across the age range of 9 through 16 yr. In contrast to comparable paradigms with visual-simultaneous materials, 30 learning disabled and 30 normal boys did not differ. Results of research on selective attention may be affected by task materials and encoding requirements.

Adolescent↗