Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Aortic Dissection”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,495 records · Page 83Linked to original sources
PubMed1996

Aortic dissection: percutaneous management of ischemic complications with endovascular stents and balloon fenestration.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate endovascular stenting (EVS) and balloon fenestration (BF) of intimal flaps for the management of lower extremity, renal, and visceral ischemia in acute or chronic aortic dissection. METHODS: Twenty-two patients (16 male, 6 female) with a median age of 53 years (range 35 to 77 years) underwent percutaneous treatment for peripheral ischemic complications of 12 type A (five acute, seven chronic) and 10 type B (nine acute, one chronic) aortic dissections. RESULTS: Ten patients had leg ischemia, 13 had renal ischemia, and 6 had visceral ischemia. Sixteen patients were treated with EVS including 11 with renal, 6 with lower extremity, 2 with superior mesenteric artery, and 2 with aortic stents. Three patients had BF of the intimal flap, and three had BF in combination with EVS. Revascularization with clinical success was achieved in all 22 patients. Two patients died 3 days and 13.4 months after the procedure was performed, respectively. Of the remaining 20 patients, 1 is lost to follow-up, and 19 have persistent relief of clinical symptoms. Mean follow-up time is 13.7 months (range 1.1 to 46.5 months). One case was complicated by guidewire-induced perinephric hematoma. CONCLUSION: EVS and BF provide a safe and effective percutaneous method for managing peripheral ischemic complications of aortic dissection.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2000

[Aortic dissection. A diagnostic hypothesis that is frequently discussed].

Aortic dissection is a dramatic event which too often carries an ominous prognosis. The characteristic clinical presentation has been well described in medical texts and cannot be misdiagnosed. However, in some not infrequent cases, symptoms and signs may be so misleading and subtle that a subsequent catastrophic evolution then seems unexpected. The diagnosis may be easily confirmed or excluded by modern diagnostic tools such as transesophageal echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging or spiral computed tomography, which all offer such accurate anatomic images of the aortic wall that nowadays it is possible to diagnose even those minimal lesions that can precede dissection, such as intramural hemorrhages or penetrating ulcers. However, these techniques are complex, costly and require experienced operators for optimum sensitivity and accuracy. Their use in patients with suspected acute aortic syndromes is of proven necessity. However, how often is all this feasible in a crowded Emergency Department where hundreds of patients with aspecific and overlapping symptoms and signs all require immediate attention? Furthermore, how often is a subtle intriguing initial presentation then followed by fatality, which might also come about some days later? Can failing to make an early diagnosis be cause for prosecution for having given a faulty diagnosis or might it be accepted as a risk related to the imprecise, probabilistic nature of the medical approach to the diagnosis? How can an Emergency Department doctor produce a reliable document of his way of proceeding in order to offer verifiable legal proof of his methodological integrity and thus be able to avoid misinterpretation of guilt? It is all too easy to judge overlooked clinical recognition when the clear and "simple" pathological diagnosis is available, if one does not consider the complexity of the disease and its possible manifestations in the single patient. In order to answer these questions it is necessary to collect the experience of doctors and others involved in this field. It is the aim of this paper and the clinical case presented to stimulate discussion and initiate the task in hand.

Aortic Dissection↗
PubMed1992

Intraoperative echocardiography for diagnosis and treatment of aortic dissection. Utility of color flow mapping for surgical decision making in acute stage.

In the past eight years until July 1992, 92 patients were admitted in the acute state of aortic dissection within two weeks from the onset of symptoms. 41 were diagnosed as Stanford type A and 51 were type B by transthoracic and transesophageal echography, computer tomography, and surgery. Sensitivity of transesophageal echography to detect the intimal flap and the false lumen was 97.6% in patients with Stanford type A and 100% in patients with Stanford type B. The surgical decision making has been mostly depending on the transesophageal echographic diagnosis. When the intimal flap was detected in the ascending aorta (Stanford type A) surgery was performed in emergency regardless of any evidence of rupture, cardiac tamponade, and severe aortic regurgitation. When the aortic dissection was detected only in the descending aorta (Stanford type B) the main course of therapeutic strategy in our institute was medical treatment. Surgery was performed on 37 patients of type A and nine patients of type B with mortality of 18.9% and 55.5% respectively. Four patients of type A and 42 patients of type B were treated medically with a mortality of 75.0% and 2.2% respectively. The relatively large leakages from the anastomosis of the aortic clamp site were repaired secondarily in two patients, and fenestration of the superior mesenteric artery was performed on one patient due to ischemia of the small intestine depending on the intraoperative direct scanning of color flow mapping. Coronary artery involvement of dissection was strongly suspected in two patients by intraoperative transesophageal echography and aortocoronary bypass grafting was performed on these patients. Perfusion problems was encountered in five of 37 patients with type A aortic dissection (13.5%) during cardiopulmonary bypass. Intraoperative transesophageal echography could clearly detect the hemodynamic changes in the descending aorta resulting from inadequate perfusion which was useful for the management of perfusion control during cardiopulmonary bypass. Secondary repair of the aortic arch was required due to ischemia of the aortic arch vessels in two patients after the primary surgery. The extension of the dissection into the aortic arch vessels can be promptly diagnosed with the combination of transesophageal echography and transcutaneous echography. In conclusion, transesophageal Doppler echography is the most rapid diagnostic tool for decision making in acute aortic dissection, and intraoperative transesophageal echo can provide useful information to resolve the perfusion difficulties during cardiopulmonary bypass.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1998

[Postoperative follow-up of acute aortic dissection and the result of second operations].

Between January 1990 and March 1998, surgical treatment was performed in 75 patients with acute aortic dissection at Omiya Medical Center. Seventy-three patients (97%) of them were classified type A aortic dissection. Thirteen of them died due to hemorrhage (5 cases), cardiac failure (3 cases), visceral ischemia (3 cases) and others (2 cases) after the operation. Hospital mortality rate was 17.3%. Sixty-two survivors were followed up to 8 years. During the follow up period, five patients died due to pneumonia, gastric cancer, cardiac failure, brain hemorrhage and unknown event. Five-year survival rate including hospital death was 77% evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method. Second operations for the enlargement of residual false lumen with the entry were performed in 4 patients (6.5%) of 62 survivors. Second operations were also performed in other 6 patients referred to us from other hospitals because of the enlargement of false lumen. Nine of them survived (90%) and returned to their daily life.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1997

[An early recrudescent case of Stanford type A closing aortic dissection].

A 81-year-old female was hospitalized with chest discomfort. Findings of CT scan revealed Stanford type A acute aortic dissection, but the dissecting lumen had already closed with thrombus. Aortogram showed no intimal tear, intimal flap or ulcer like projection. Under the diagnosis of "closing aortic dissection", conservative treatment was selected. The dissecting lumen was disappearing gradually, but she had a sudden chest pain on hospital day 4 and CT scan demonstrated an enlarged and enhanced dissecting lumen. She underwent an emergency operation and a hemiarch replacement was performed successfully. Her postoperative course was uneventful and she was discharged from the hospital in good health.

Aged↗
PubMed1994

Simultaneous graft replacement of the ascending aorta and total aortic arch for type A aortic dissection.

We performed simultaneous graft replacement of the total aortic arch and ascending aorta for type A aortic dissection with a patent false lumen extending through the arch into the descending or abdominal aorta. During the past 7 years, this procedure was performed in 42 patients (28 men and 14 women), aged 20 to 72 years (mean age, 50 years). Nineteen patients underwent the procedure during the acute period, and 23 during the chronic period. The site of the initial intimal tear was the ascending aorta in 17 patients and the transverse aortic arch in 25 patients. Artificial graft replacement was initially accomplished by proximal anastomosis, followed by open distal anastomosis, and finally by anastomosis of each of the three arch vessels. There were 3 hospital deaths (7.1%), 1 resulting from acute dissection (5.3%) and 2 from chronic dissection (8.7%). Among the type A dissections, total arch graft replacement has been indicated in the setting of rupture of the aortic arch, arch dissection, and Marfan's syndrome. However, with increasing experience in arch reconstructions and improvement in outcome, the indications could be expanded to include all type A aortic dissections with a patent false lumen in the descending aorta.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

True lumen obliteration in complicated aortic dissection: endovascular treatment.

PURPOSE: To evaluate endovascular treatment of ischemic complications caused by true lumen obliteration in aortic dissection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Endovascular techniques were used to treat true lumen obliteration in 11 patients with complicated aortic dissection. In all cases, the true lumen was compressed to a paper-thin sliver by the expanded false lumen. Two patients had Stanford type A (chronic) and nine had type B (six acute, three chronic) dissections. Obliteration of the true lumen was associated with branch vessel ischemia that included renal (n = 7), mesenteric (n = 6), and lower-extremity (n = 6) arterial compromise. Two patients were treated with aortic stents, four with balloon fenestration of the intimal flap, and three with both stent placement and fenestration. In two patients, ischemic complications caused by true lumen obliteration could not be treated with endovascular techniques. RESULTS: Revascularization was technically successful with relief of clinical symptoms in nine patients. Revascularization was unsuccessful in one patient in whom surgical revascularization of the superior mesenteric artery was necessary and in one in whom hypertension was managed medically. One patient developed thrombosis of a renal artery in which a stent had been placed. The 30-day mortality rate was 9%, and the mean follow-up was 10.1 months (range, 2 weeks to 39 months). CONCLUSION: True lumen obliteration can be safely and effectively treated with endovascular stent placement and balloon fenestration.

Aortic Dissection↗
PubMed2002

[Long-term results of aortic arch replacement using combination of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest and retrograde cerebral perfusion; comparison of result for atherosclerotic aneurysm and aortic dissection].

Between 1992 and 2001, 73 patients with aortic arch lesion underwent surgical treatment. The aneurysm was characterized by atherosclerosis in 54 patients (TAA) and by aortic dissection in 19 patients (DAA). All patients received graft replacement under combination of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest and retrograde cerebral perfusion. The hospital mortality rate for all patients was 15.6%. The follow-up period of 61 survival patients ranged from 2 to 90 months (mean 33.2 months). The actuarial survival rate was 93.2%, 83.5%, and 79.7% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. No significant difference was noted between TAA and DAA in the actuarial survival rate. The freedom from vascular complication was 97.9%, 95.8%, and 95.8% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. The rate was significant higher in the patients of DAA than in those of TAA (TAA: 100%, 100%, and 100%, DAA: 90.9%, 81.8%, and 81.8%). The freedom from cardiac complication was 96.4%, 89.7%, and 84.1% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. There was no significant difference between TAA and DAA. The freedom from cerebrovascular complication was 100%, 97.6%, and 83.4% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. No significant difference was noted between TAA and DAA. The late result of surgical treatment for the aortic arch using combination of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest and retrograde cerebral perfusion was satisfied. The long-term survival rate was higher in TAA patient than in DAA one. The possibility remained that fatal vascular complication affected the long-term survival rate.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Axillary artery cannulation improves operative results for acute type a aortic dissection.

BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to identify preoperative and postoperative predictors of hospital death of patients with acute type A aortic dissection. METHODS: Between May 1,1992, and July 31, 2004, 106 consecutive patients (59 male and 47 female, mean age 62.2 +/- 12.1 years) with acute type A aortic dissection underwent surgery with open technique and cerebral protection by antegrade selective cerebral perfusion. The external iliac artery or femoral artery alone was used for arterial cannulation in 37 patients; however, the right axillary artery was cannulated in 69 patients. Univariate analysis of potential risk factors was performed to identify risk factors for hospital death and was followed by multivariate analysis by a stepwise logistic regression model to identify independent risk factors. RESULTS: Sixteen patients died postoperatively, and the overall hospital mortality rate was 15.1%. Univariate analysis revealed shock (p = 0.020), visceral ischemia (p = 0.007), root replacement (p = 0.041), and absence of axillary artery perfusion (p = 0.003) as significant risk factors for hospital death. Multivariate analysis revealed visceral ischemia (p = 0.0028, odds ratio 18.4) and absence of axillary artery perfusion (p = 0.0014, odds ratio 8.2) as independent preoperative and intraoperative predictors of hospital death. CONCLUSIONS: Achievement of greater success in the surgical treatment of acute type A dissection will require axillary artery cannulation and measures to prevent visceral malperfusion.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Acute type A aortic dissection: retrograde perfusion with left superior vena cava.

Retrograde cerebral perfusion with hypothermic circulatory arrest confers additional cerebral protection during repair of type A aortic dissection. We present a 42-year-old man with acute type A aortic dissection and a persistent, left superior vena cava. Cannulation of the right and left superior vena cava is used for retrograde perfusion of both hemispheres with bilateral monitoring of electroencephalogram and somatosensory-evoked potentials during and after the hypothermic circulatory arrest interval.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Seeing the invisible: painless aortic dissection in the emergency setting.

Acute dissection of the aorta can be one of the most dramatic cardiovascular emergencies. Classically, aortic dissection presents as sudden, severe chest, back, or abdominal pain that is characterised as ripping or tearing in nature. However, a timely diagnosis can be elusive in the event of an atypical presentation. In this report, the authors present two patients with painless aortic dissection who were misdiagnosed during their initial evaluation in the emergency department.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Hemodynamic considerations regarding the mechanism and prevention of aortic dissection.

We describe the hemodynamic principles that we postulate are responsible for the development of aortic dissection. Two types are differentiated: the "hypertensive" and the "Marfan" types. The former is characterized by moderate aortic dilatation and considerable blood pressure elevation, the latter by considerable aortic dilatation only. The role of wall stress in the development of the intimal tear and the propagation of the process of dissection are discussed. We recommend that patients who are at high risk for developing aortic dissection--those with Marfan's syndrome and dilated aortas--should undergo aortoplasty and wall reinforcement as a simple, safe, and effective way to prevent aortic dissection.

Aortic Dissection↗
PubMed1997

Three-dimensional spiral computed tomography angiography as an alternative imaging modality for a silent dissecting aortic aneurysm--a case report.

The authors report a patient with silent dissecting aortic aneurysm in whom three-dimensional spiral computed tomography (CT) angiography (3D-CTA) provided important imaging data. Images obtained by 3D-CTA were compared with the results of both conventional angiography and CT. They conclude that 3D-CTA was a powerful diagnostic modality for this patient, in addition to conventional CT and angiography.

Aortic Dissection↗
PubMed1993

Giant dissecting aortic aneurysm with concealed perforation in an 81-year-old female.

This paper describes the history of an 81-year-old female suffering from a giant dissecting aortic aneurysm with concealed perforation within the thorax. The patient had suffered from arterial hypertension for about 10 years and had been treated with thiazide. Nine months prior to admission the patient was in a state of collapse, and ultrasound examination revealed an intra-abdominal aortic aneurysm. At this time thoracic x-ray showed aortic sclerosis and elongation of the aorta but no signs of aneurysm formation. After this episode the patient was symptom-free for the next 9 months. Following a further syncopal attack with severe thoracic pain, the patient was hospitalized at the intensive care unit. Both in thoracic x-ray and computed tomography of the thorax, a pronounced dissecting aortic aneurysm with perforation of the thoracic aorta into the mediastinum could be established. Because of the patient's poor general condition and advanced age, as well as far-reaching pathological findings, surgery was not advised by either the heart and vascular surgeon or the anesthetist. Following 1 week's intensive therapy, the patient's general condition improved greatly, with stabilization of thoracic pain, blood pressure, and respiratory action. On the other hand, thoracic x-ray, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging produced a distinct progression of the aneurysm with consequent mild displacement of mediastinum and left lung. Laboratory examinations for syphilis showed no evidence of that disease. After further improvement the patient was discharged 4 weeks after admission and has been symptom-free for 6 months in spite of the extensive pathological findings described herein.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Aged↗
PubMed1997

[Debakey IIIb aortic dissection from a distal arch atherosclerotic aneurysm--a case report].

We treated a 75-year-old male patient with DeBakey IIIb aortic dissection from a distal arch atherosclerotic aneurysm 75 mm in diameter. Arch replacement was carried out by separate extracorporeal circulation. The entry located juxta-atherosclerotic aneurysm. It was considered that shear stress at the turning point of blood flow would occur the dissection. The relationship between the atherosclerotic aneurysm and the aortic dissection was studied.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Emergency graft replacement of the aortic arch for acute type A aortic dissection.

Between May 1988 and December 1990, 7 patients underwent graft replacement of both the ascending aorta and aortic arch for acute type A aortic dissection. Preoperative complications included cardiac tamponade in 5 cases, rupture of the left pleural cavity in 1, and aortic regurgitation in 5. All operations were performed with the aid of extracorporeal circulation and selective cerebral perfusion (SCP) on an emergency basis. Concomitant procedures included aortic cusp suspension in 3 cases, Bentall operation in 2, and CABG in 1. There were no deaths within 1 month of surgery, nor were there serious postoperative cerebral complications. One patient with chronic obstructive lung disease died of pneumonia 5 months after the operation. The other 6 patients are presently leading normal lives with long-term follow-up. The present data suggest that SCP with an open aortic anastomosis is a useful adjunct in aortic arch replacement for acute type A aortic dissection.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Aortic dissection extending from the left coronary artery during percutaneous coronary angioplasty.

A 72-year-old woman with acute aortic dissection as a complication of percutaneous coronary angioplasty was successfully treated. She received a graft replacement of the ascending aorta as well as triple coronary artery bypass grafts. The dissection had extended from the left coronary artery. Although acute aortic dissection is a rare complication of percutaneous coronary angioplasty, physicians and cardiac surgeons should keep its potential occurrence in mind.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1996

Intravascular stenting of traumatic abdominal aortic dissection.

PURPOSE: We describe the case of a 34-year-old man with blunt abdominal trauma. Initial abdominal computed tomography scan showed retroperitoneal hematoma, pancreatic contusion, multiple fractures of the transverse process in the thoraco-lumbar spine, and infrarenal aortic dissection. METHOD: Angiography revealed that the aortic dissection originated proximal to the inferior mesenteric artery and extended down to the left common iliac artery without vascular obliteration. The pancreatic trauma was managed without operation, and the dissection was treated with aortic and left iliac endovascular self-expanding Schneider Wall Stents. RESULT: Immediate angiographic and computed tomography scan examination showed the obliteration of the greater part of the dissection with persistence of a short dissected segment at the level of the aortic bifurcation. Examination a week later showed thrombosis of this false lumen and complete obliteration of the dissection. CONCLUSION: Intravascular stenting allowed treatment of the dissection without open surgical procedures requiring laparotomy and aortic operation.

Abdominal Injuries↗