Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “DESIPRAMINE”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,477 records · Page 82Linked to original sources

Effect of chronic treatment with tricyclic antidepressants upon antinociception induced by intrathecal injection of morphine and monoamines.

The effects of acute and chronic treatment with tricyclic antidepressants (TCA) upon antinociception induced by intrathecally administered serotonin (5-HT), norepinephrine (NE), and morphine were assessed at weekly intervals by the tail-flick method in the rat. Acute pretreatment with either clomipramine (28.5 mumol/kg, s.c.) or desipramine (85.5 mumol/kg, s.c.) enhanced the analgesia induced by both intrathecally-administered morphine (7.5 nmol) and 5-HT (241 nmol), compared to saline (1 ml/kg) but only desipramine facilitated the effects of intrathecally administered NE (0.49 nmol). The chronic (22 day) administration of both tricyclic antidepressants resulted in loss of the enhancement of the effects of morphine (day 22) and 5-HT (day 15); only desipramine (day 15) abolished the facilitation of NE. In a similar study, acute pretreatment with the non-tricyclic antidepressant inhibitor of the reuptake of NE, nisoxetine, (97.5 mumol/kg, s.c.), amplified the effects of intrathecally administered NE and morphine but not 5-HT-induced analgesia. Although chronic (22 day) treatment with nisoxetine caused a loss of the effects of enhancement of morphine (day 8), there was no effect upon the action of NE and antinociception induced by 5-HT was facilitated (day 22). Receptor binding studies indicated that chronic (22 day) treatment with clomipramine, desipramine or nisoxetine reduced the affinity of opiate [3H]naloxone) receptors in the spinal cord. These results demonstrate that (1) acute treatment with trycyclic antidepressants enhanced analgesia induced by intrathecally injected morphine, and (2) the chronic administration of trycyclic antidepressants resulted in a loss of enhancement of the effects of morphine, given intrathecally, which appeared to be independent of alterations in the activity of NE or 5-HT but may be associated with the development of subsensitive opiate receptors.

Analgesia↗

Buthus martensi karsch venom: prejunctional adrenergic activity in the rat isolated anococcygeus muscle.

The effect of Buthus martensi Karsch venom (MKV) on adrenergic responses was investigated using the rat isolated anococcygeus muscle (Acm), since several scorpion venoms can cause peripheral sympathetic nerve stimulation with enhanced adrenergic responses. The effects of phentolamine (5 microM), guanethidine (5 microM), tetrodotoxin (2 microM), desipramine (1.5 microM) and reserpine pretreatment in vivo (5 mg/kg s.c. x 24 hr and 5 mg/kg i.p. x 3 hr) on contractile responses of the rat Acm to field stimulation, noradrenaline (3 microM), tyramine (10 microM), crude MKV (2 micrograms/ml), carbachol (3 microM) and potassium chloride (50 mM) were compared. Phentolamine, guanethidine, tetrodotoxin and reserpine pretreatment completely blocked the contractile responses of the Acm to MKV and to field stimulation but desipramine potentiated the responses. The responses to NA were completely blocked by phentolamine, but were potentiated by guanethidine, desipramine and reserpine pretreatment. The contractile responses to tyramine were completely blocked by phentolamine, desipramine and reserpine pretreatment. The low doses (0.1 microgram/ml x 3) of MKV, which did not produce any observable increase in tone of the anococcygeus muscle, potentiated the contractile responses to field stimulation, but not the responses to exogenous NA. Thus, the adrenergic agonist action of MKV in the rat isolated anococcygeus muscle is mediated by some prejunctional mechanism(s) of action, presumably stimulating the release of the neurotransmitter noradrenaline.

Animals↗

Antidepressant binding: implications for the mode of action and the biology of depression.

(3H)Imipramine binding sites in the brain are localized mainly on serotonergic nerve terminals. In the hippocampus of rats with a lesion of serotonergic nerve terminals produced by neonatal administration of 5,7-DHT, the depletion of serotonin was paralleled by a decrease in (3H)imipramine recognition sites. (3H)Imipramine recognition sites in brain tissue or platelets are associated with serotonin uptake sites. A significant correlation exists between the potency of a series of antidepressants and other compounds to displace high affinity (3H)imipramine binding and to inhibit the neuronal uptake of serotonin but not of norepinephrine. There is a significant correlation between the ability of drugs to displace (3H)desipramine binding and to inhibit norepinephrine but not serotonin reuptake. (3H)Desipramine recognition sites are located, at least in part, at noradrenergic nerve terminals since destruction of these terminals by 6-OH-DA results in parallel decrease in (3H)desipramine, but not in (3H)imipramine binding. The high affinity recognition sites of (3H)imipramine and (3H)desipramine in the brain could be physiologically and pharmacologically relevant regulatory sites associated with neuronal uptake of serotonin and norepinephrine, respectively. Treatments which clinically lead to improvement of depression (eg. antidepressants, ECT, REM sleep deprivation) were shown to "down-regulate" (3H)imipramine binding sites in brain of experimental animals. The density of (3H)imipramine binding sites was shown to be lower in platelets from depressive patients and in brains of suicide victims. It appears that decreased binding of (3H)imipramine to platelets of depressed patients is a promising biological marker of depression, although there is no conclusive evidence to indicate whether it is a state- or trait-dependent phenomenon.

Animals↗

Antidepressant and other centrally acting drugs regulate glucocorticoid receptor messenger RNA levels in rat brain.

The effect of imipramine, desipramine, ketanserin and lithium on Type II glucocorticoid receptor (GR) mRNA levels was studied in rat brain regions involved in the control of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, the dysregulation of which has been implicated in the pathophysiology of major depression. Northern blot analysis of Type II GR mRNA showed that treatment of male rats with either desipramine or imipramine increased hypothalamic and hippocampal GR mRNA levels. Upregulation of GR mRNA following administration of imipramine was found in brain regions of female rats, while desipramine had no effect. Ketanserin increased levels of GR mRNA in hippocampus of male, but not female, rats. Lithium also was able to induce important increases rat brain GR mRNA; this effect was particularly marked in females. We conclude that desipramine, imipramine, ketanserin and lithium can modulate GR mRNA in regions of rat brain involved in the control of the HPA axis and may have a common mechanism of action at the level of the GR gene. Sexual dimorphism for drug regulation of brain GR mRNA content was shown and may be related to sex differences in the prevalence of certain affective disorders.

Amygdala↗

Hyperfunctionality of serotonin-2C receptor-mediated inhibition of accumbal dopamine release in an animal model of depression is reversed by antidepressant treatment.

Dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens mediates motivation and reward, making it a likely candidate to be involved in anhedonia, one of the major symptoms of depression. In the current study, alterations in basal extracellular dopamine levels and 5HT2C receptor-mediated inhibition of accumbal dopamine release in Flinders Sensitive Line (FSL) rats, an animal model of depression, were investigated. We found that FSL rats have decreased extracellular dopamine levels in the nucleus accumbens and an increased inhibitory-like effect of 5HT2C receptors on accumbal dopamine release. However, neither basal 5HT levels nor the accumbal 5HT response to the local 5HT2C receptor antagonist (RS 102221) differed between Sprague-Dawley and FSL rats. Seven-day treatment with the nefazodone (a serotonin/noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor and 5HT2C antagonist) as well as 7-day and 14-day treatments with a tricyclic antidepressant desipramine increased extracellular dopamine levels in the nucleus accumbens of FSL rats. However, only 14-day treatment with desipramine or 7-day treatment with nefazodone, but not 7-day treatment with desipramine, decreased 5HT2C receptor-mediated inhibition of accumbal dopamine release. Based on a possible correlation between the onset of 5HT2C receptor-mediated inhibition and the behavioral effects of desipramine and nefazodone treatment that was described in our previous studies, we suggest that 5HT2C receptor activation may be important for the onset of the behavioral effects of antidepressant treatment.

Analysis of Variance↗

Antidepressants reverse corticosterone-mediated decrease in brain-derived neurotrophic factor expression: differential regulation of specific exons by antidepressants and corticosterone.

Earlier studies have implicated brain-derived neurotrophic factor in stress and in the mechanism of action of antidepressants. It has been shown that antidepressants upregulate, whereas corticosterone downregulates, brain-derived neurotrophic factor expression in rat brain. Whether various classes of antidepressants reverse corticosterone-mediated downregulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor is unclear. Also not known is how antidepressants or corticosterone regulates brain-derived neurotrophic factor expression. To clarify this, we examined the effects of various classes of antidepressants and corticosterone, alone and in combination, on the mRNA expression of total brain-derived neurotrophic factor and of individual brain-derived neurotrophic factor exons, in rat brain. Normal or corticosterone pellet-implanted (100 mg, 21 days) rats were injected with different classes of antidepressants, fluoxetine, desipramine, or phenelzine, intraperitoneally for 21 days and killed 2 h after the last injection. mRNA expression of total brain-derived neurotrophic factor and of exons I-IV was measured in frontal cortex and hippocampus. Given to normal rats, fluoxetine increased total brain-derived neurotrophic factor mRNA only in hippocampus, whereas desipramine or phenelzine increased brain-derived neurotrophic factor mRNA in both frontal cortex and hippocampus. When specific exons were examined, desipramine increased expression of exons I and III in both brain areas, whereas phenelzine increased exon I in both frontal cortex and hippocampus but exon IV only in hippocampus. On the other hand, fluoxetine increased only exon II in hippocampus. Corticosterone treatment of normal rats decreased expression of total brain-derived neurotrophic factor mRNA in both brain areas, specifically decreasing exons II and IV. Treatment with desipramine or phenelzine of corticosterone pellet-implanted rats reversed the corticosterone-induced decrease in total brain-derived neurotrophic factor expression in both brain areas; however, fluoxetine reversed the decrease only partially in hippocampus. Interestingly, antidepressant treatment of corticosterone pellet-implanted rats increased only those specific exons that are increased during treatment of normal rats with each particular antidepressant. We found that although corticosterone and antidepressants both modulate brain-derived neurotrophic factor expression, and antidepressants reverse the corticosterone-induced brain-derived neurotrophic factor decrease, antidepressants and corticosterone differ in how they regulate the expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor exon(s).

Animals↗

Antidepressant action of agomelatine (S 20098) in a transgenic mouse model.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of agomelatine (S 20098) to accelerate reversal of the neuroendocrinological, behavioural and cyclical changes seen in a transgenic mouse model of the neuroendocrine characteristics of depression. The effects of agomelatine were assessed in transgenic mice with low glucocorticoid receptor (GR) function, after acute stress or induced phase shift, and compared to desipramine and melatonin. Mice were injected 2 h before the onset of the dark period with agomelatine (10 mg/kg, i.p.), desipramine (10 mg/kg, i.p.), melatonin (10 mg/kg, i.p.) or vehicle (hydroxy-ethyl-cellulose (HEC) 1%) each day for 21 to 42 days. Agomelatine was effective in reversing the transgenic mouse behavioural changes noted in the Porsolt forced swim test as well as in the elevated plus maze. Both the number of open arm entries and the total time spent in open arms of the elevated plus maze is greatly increased in transgenic mice. The mean time spent in open arms is exquisitely sensitive to reversal by agomelatine and desipramine. Agomelatine also markedly accelerated readjustment of circadian cycles of temperature and activity following an induced phase shift. This action of agomelatine was superior to that of melatonin while desipramine was without effect. The accelerating effect of agomelatine was particularly notable if treatment was started 3 weeks prior to the induced phase shift. Agomelatine treatment did not cause any major change in corticosterone or adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) concentrations nor in vasopressin (AVP), corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH), GR and mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) mRNAs levels, which make it unlikely that the mechanism of agomelatine action is related to hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) axis changes. The present study shows that agomelatine displays some characteristics of antidepressant drug action in the transgenic mouse model, effects that could be partially related to its chronobiotic properties.

Acetamides↗

Increased noradrenaline efflux induced by local infusion of fluoxetine in the rat frontal cortex.

In microdialysis experiments in vivo, local infusion of either the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, fluoxetine, or the selective noradrenaline uptake inhibitor, desipramine, increased noradrenaline efflux in rat frontal cortex. Synaptosomal uptake of [3H]noradrenaline was used to test whether inhibition of uptake could contribute to this effect of fluoxetine. Low concentrations of fluoxetine were less effective than desipramine at inhibiting [3H]noradrenaline uptake; both compounds were more potent than the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, citalopram. To investigate whether this inhibition of uptake involved an action on noradrenergic neurones, experiments compared the effects of a noradrenergic lesion, induced by the neurotoxin N-(2-chloroethyl)-N-ethyl-2-bromobenzylamine (DSP-4), on the inhibition of uptake by fluoxetine, desipramine and citalopram. The lesion reduced [3H]noradrenaline uptake in the presence of fluoxetine and citalopram but increased it in the presence of desipramine. The results suggest both that inhibition of noradrenaline uptake could contribute to the actions of fluoxetine and that a non-noradrenergic mechanisms is a target for this action.

Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors↗

Pharmacological studies on the antagonism by antidepressants of the hypothermia induced by apomorphine.

In male Swiss mice, the hypothermia induced by apomorphine (10 mg/kg) was completely blocked by administration of haloperidol and d-butaclamol, but not by l-butaclamol, phenoxybenzamine, clozapine or propranolol. This substantiated the dopaminergic nature of the hypothermia induced by apomorphine. Desipramine, imipramine, chlorimipramine, fluoxetine and mazindol produced a dose-dependent blockade of apomorphine-induced hypothermia, their ED50S being 0.313, 0.733, 1.88, 6.04 and 0.0033 mg/kg, respectively. Iprindole failed to block the hypothermia induced by apomorphine. Because chlorimipramine and fluoxetine, which are relatively more selective and more potent blockers of the uptake of serotonin (5-HT) than is desipramine, were considerably less effective than the latter in antagonizing hypothermia induced by apomorphine, it was concluded that the property of blocking uptake of 5-HT alone does not contribute to the antagonism to apomorphine exhibited by the classical antidepressants. Quipazine, a 5-HT agonist, blocked the hypothermia induced by apomorphine, this effect developed tolerance on repeated administration. However, no cross-tolerance between quipazine and the antidepressants could be demonstrated. This finding provided further support for the non-involvement of 5-HT in the antagonism to apomorphine. No correlation existed between the potencies of these antidepressants to block the reuptake of norepinephrine (NE) in brain and their relative potencies to block the hypothermia induced by apomorphine. Moreover, selective depletion of high affinity binding sites for [3H]desipramine and [3H]-NE, achieved by treatment with DSP-4, failed to reduce the effectiveness of desipramine in blocking the hypothermia induced by apomorphine. Hence, inhibition of uptake of NE does not account for the antagonism by the antidepressants of apomorphine-induced hypothermia. A possibility was considered that certain antidepressants selectively blocked the hypothalamic DA receptors, thereby antagonizing the hypothermic effects of apomorphine, leaving the extra-hypothalamic dopaminergic responses of this DA agonist unaffected.

Animals↗

Behavioral effects of family-selective inhibitors of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases.

The effects of family selective inhibitors of phosphodiesterase (PDEI, PDE2, PDE3, PDE4, and PDE5) on the behavior of rats under either a differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate (DRL) 72-s schedule or a variable-interval (VI) 30-s schedule were determined; previous work has shown that antidepressant drugs increase reinforcement rate under long DRL schedules. The PDE4-selective inhibitor rolipram (0.03-0.1 mg/kg) reduced response rate and increased reinforcement rate under the DRL schedule in a dose-dependent manner; similar effects were observed with the tricyclic antidepressant drug desipramine (3-10 mg/kg). Both of these drugs produced biphasic effects on behavior maintained under the VI schedule, increasing response rate at the lower doses tested (rolipram: 0.003 mg/kg; desipramine: 0.03 mg/kg) and decreasing response rate at higher doses (rolipram: 0.1 mg/kg; desipramine: 0.3-18 mg/kg). Of the other PDE inhibitors tested, only the PDE5-selective inhibitor zaprinast (10 mg/kg) produced an antidepressant-like effect on DRL behavior. However, in contrast to the biphasic effects of rolipram and desipramine on VI behavior, zaprinast produced monotonic decreases in response rate (10-30 mg/kg). The PDE2-selective inhibitor trequinsin produced biphasic effects on response rate under the VI schedule, increasing rates at low doses (3-5.6 mg/kg) and decreasing rates at higher doses (18-30 mg/kg). Trequinsin also reduced response rate under the DRL schedule (30 mg/kg); however, the reduction in response rate was not accompanied by increased reinforcement rate. The PDE3-selective inhibitor milrinone (1-10 mg/kg) tended to increase response rates under both schedules while the PDE1-selective inhibitor vinpocetine did not affect behavior at the dose range tested (1-30 mg/kg). These findings suggest that inhibition of PDE4 results in a rather unique pattern of behavioral effects, most notably an antidepressant-like effect on DRL behavior. It remains to be determined if a similar effect produced by zaprinast also implicates PDE5 in the mediation of antidepressant activity or represents an effect of this drug on PDE4 activity at high doses.

3',5'-Cyclic-AMP Phosphodiesterases↗

Involvement of noradrenaline transporters in S-nitrosocysteine-stimulated noradrenaline release from rat brain slices: existence of functional Na(+)-independent transporter activity.

Noradrenaline (NA) can be released by both exocytosis and by the membrane transporter responsible for transmitter uptake. Previously, we reported that S-nitrosocysteine (SNC), an S-nitrosothiol, stimulated [3H]NA release from the rat hippocampus. In this study, we investigated the involvement of the NA transport system in SNC-stimulated NA release from rat brain (cerebral cortex and hippocampus) slices. [3H]NA release by SNC in normal Na(+) (148 mM)-containing buffer from both slices was slightly, but significantly, inhibited by 1 microM desipramine, an NA transporter inhibitor. [3H]NA release in low Na(+) (under 14 mM)-containing buffer was inhibited by over 50% by desipramine. [3H]NA release by tyramine from both slices in normal and low Na(+) buffer was almost completely inhibited by desipramine. [3H]NA uptake into cerebral cortical slices was observed in low Na(+) buffer at 20-30% of normal Na(+) buffer levels. [3H]NA uptake in both normal and low Na(+) buffers was inhibited by desipramine and by SNC. Although [3H]NA uptake in normal Na(+) buffer was almost completely inhibited by 500 microM ouabain, the uptake in low Na(+) buffer was resistant to ouabain. These findings suggest the existence of a functional Na(+)-independent NA transport system and that SNC stimulates NA release at least partially via this system in brain slices.

Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors↗

Effects of different doses of venlafaxine on serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake in healthy volunteers.

Venlafaxine is generally considered to be a dual 5-HT and NE reuptake inhibitor when it is used at doses above 75 mg/d in humans. While its 5-HT reuptake-inhibiting property has been demonstrated, some controversy still exists regarding the doses of venlafaxine required to inhibit NE reuptake. Healthy male volunteers received, on a double-blind basis, paroxetine (20 mg/d), desipramine (100 mg/d), nefazodone (300 mg/d), or venlafaxine (150 or 300 mg/d) in the last 5 d of a 7-d period of administration. Inhibition of 5-HT reuptake was estimated by determining the degree of depletion of whole-blood 5-HT, while that of NE was assessed by measuring the attenuation of the systolic blood pressure increases produced by intravenous injections of tyramine. Paroxetine, both regimens of venlafaxine, and to a lesser extent desipramine significantly decreased whole-blood 5-HT content. Nefazodone failed to produce any significant change. Desipramine abolished the tyramine pressor response, whereas all other drug regimens left this parameter unaltered. Venlafaxine and paroxetine acted as potent 5-HT reuptake inhibitors in the present study. In contrast, neither the moderate nor the high dose of venlafaxine displayed any significant inhibiting activity in this model assessing NE reuptake in peripheral NE terminals. The validity of the model was confirmed by the potent inhibitory action of desipramine on NE reuptake. While the reasons for this unexpected lack of action remain unclear, venlafaxine appeared to be an effective NE reuptake agent in depressed patients using the same approach.

Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors↗

Effect of norepinephrine uptake blockers on norepinephrine kinetics.

We studied the effect of a single oral dose of the neuronal norepinephrine uptake blocker, desipramine 125 mg, on norepinephrine kinetics. Desipramine reduced the plasma norepinephrine clearance by approximately 20%, from 1.33 +/- 0.22 to 1.08 +/- 0.19 l/m2/min (p less than 0.01). Similarly, plasma norepinephrine clearance was slowed in patients with sympathetic nerves damaged by disease (idiopathic peripheral autonomic insufficiency). Desipramine also reduced the rate of spillover of norepinephrine to plasma, 0.27 +/- 0.07 to 0.15 +/- 0.04 micrograms/m2/min, leaving the plasma norepinephrine concentration unchanged. Disappearance of tritiated norepinephrine from plasma, after infusion to steady state, was biexponential, with half-time of the rapid-removal phase (t1 1/2) = 2.0 +/- 0.4 min and half-time of the second exponential (t2 1/2) = 34 +/- 10 min. The rapid-removal phase was sensitive to disturbances in the neuronal uptake of norepinephrine, the t1 1/2 being prolonged by desipramine and lengthened in the patients with peripheral autonomic insufficiency. In contrast, the selective extraneuronal norepinephrine uptake blocker, cortisol, 500 mg intravenously, had no effect in normal subjects on either plasma norepinephrine clearance or the t1 1/2 value. Neuronal uptake of norepinephrine contributes to the overall removal of norepinephrine from plasma. Extraneuronal uptake of norepinephrine could not be demonstrated at existing plasma norepinephrine concentrations.

Adult↗

Duloxetine increases serotonin and norepinephrine availability in healthy subjects: a double-blind, controlled study.

Evidence suggests that compounds that increase the synaptic availability of more than one neurotransmitter have greater efficacy in the treatment of depression than single-acting drugs. Preclinical studies indicate that duloxetine acts to inhibit serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine (NE) transporters. The ability of duloxetine to alter 5-HT and NE reuptake was tested in 12 healthy male subjects. Placebo, desipramine 50 mg b.i.d., and duloxetine (80 mg q.d. or 60 mg b.i.d.) were compared in a randomized, double-blind, three-period crossover study in 12 healthy male subjects. Whole-blood 5-HT, urinary excretion of NE and major metabolites, and TYR PD30 (IV tyramine pressor dose needed to increase systolic blood pressure by 30 mmHg) were measured at steady state. Vital signs were measured periodically. Duloxetine affected 5-HT reuptake, with whole-blood 5-HT depletion vs placebo (80 mg q.d.: p=0.07; 60 mg b.i.d.: p=0.02; combined regimens: p=0.01). Cardiovascular changes reflecting increased sympathetic tone were observed with both duloxetine and desipramine, and both treatments significantly decreased whole body NE turnover (p<0.01). Duloxetine and desipramine were associated with similar mean increases in fractional extraneuronal NE concentration, although these changes did not reach statistical significance. TYR PD30 increased significantly with desipramine dosing (p<0.01). In conclusion, whole-blood measurements confirm that duloxetine inhibits platelet 5-HT uptake in vivo. Urinary and cardiovascular measurements suggest that duloxetine has an effect on NE synthesis and turnover, indicative of NE reuptake inhibition. The lack of a detectable impact of duloxetine on TYR PD30 suggests that this may not be the most sensitive indirect measure of NE reuptake when assessing dual reuptake inhibitors.

Adult↗

Duloxetine is both an inhibitor and a substrate of cytochrome P4502D6 in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Duloxetine, a potent dual reuptake inhibitor of serotonin and norepinephrine currently undergoing clinical investigation for treatment of depression and stress urinary incontinence, has the potential to act as both a substrate and an inhibitor of cytochrome P4502D6 (CYP2D6). Our objectives were to determine the effect of duloxetine on the pharmacokinetics of desipramine, a tricyclic antidepressant metabolized by CYP2D6 (study 1), and the effect of paroxetine, a potent CYP2D6 inhibitor, on duloxetine pharmacokinetics (study 2). METHODS: Subjects were healthy men and women between 21 and 63 years old. All subjects were genotypically CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers. In study 1, 50 mg of desipramine was administered as a single dose alone and in the presence of steady-state duloxetine 60 mg twice daily. In study 2, steady-state pharmacokinetics of duloxetine 40 mg once daily were determined in the presence and absence of steady-state paroxetine 20 mg once daily. RESULTS: Duloxetine increased the maximum plasma concentration of desipramine 1.7-fold and the area under the concentration-time curve 2.9-fold. Paroxetine increased the maximum plasma concentration of duloxetine and the area under the concentration-time curve at steady state 1.6-fold. Reports of adverse events were similar whether duloxetine was administered alone or in combination with desipramine or paroxetine. CONCLUSION: Duloxetine 60 mg twice daily is a moderately potent CYP2D6 inhibitor, intermediate between paroxetine and sertraline. The potent CYP2D6 inhibitor paroxetine has a moderate effect on duloxetine concentrations. The results of these 2 studies suggest that caution should be used when CYP2D6 substrates and inhibitors are coadministered with duloxetine.

Adult↗

Prevalence variations in psychotropic treatment of children.

This study was undertaken to clarify several aspects of the estimation of prevalence of three commonly use pediatric psychotropic agents, namely, methylphenidate, desipramine, and imipramine. The study aims are threefold: (1) to show the variability of drug prevalence by comparing estimates from three data sources; (2) to show the misleading impression that can be created by reporting drug prevalence estimates based on counts of prescriptions rather than persons; (3) to show the utility of gender-by-age-specific prevalence of drug use as a marker for diagnosis. Two data sources that yield population-based prescription estimates were available: 1991 Medicaid administrative claims data for prescriptions from a mid-Atlantic state and 1991 prescription records of the northwest region of Kaiser Permanente, a staff-model health maintenance organization (HMO). Another source of data consists of the 1991 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, which records medication information reported during physician office visits. Data analysis consists of quantitative estimates of (1) drug prevalence from each source; (2) the ratio of prescription claims to persons; and (3) the proportion of drug use according to age and gender. Methylphenidate and desipramine prevalence had a twofold greater use among state Medicaid enrollees compared with HMO enrollees. Average claims-to-person ratios of 5:1 suggest better accuracy using persons with medication rather than prescription counts. Gender-by-age-specific prevalence rates showed that 75% of the drug use for desipramine among those less than 15 years old was found among males, whereas 75% of the desipramine use among those 15 or older was found among females, suggesting its use for the treatment of attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder among young males and for depression among older females. The variability of community physician decision making in pediatric psychopharmacology is better understood by observing drug prevalence rates from different settings. National sampling efforts should be undertaken to verify regional and setting-specific prevalence findings and to learn the reasons for their fluctuation.

Adult↗

Mechanisms of noradrenaline release in the anoxic heart of the rat.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to examine the time course of exocytotic and "spontaneous" noradrenaline overflow and the influence of an Uptake1 inhibitor, desipramine, in rat hearts subjected to anoxic and substrate-free perfusion. METHODS: Hearts were perfused with a constant flow and exocytotic noradrenaline overflow was elicited either by electrical stimulation of the left stellate ganglion or by K+ depolarisation. Noradrenaline overflow was measured by HPLC. RESULTS: Energy depletion for a period of 30 min resulted in an enhanced spontaneous noradrenaline overflow and a progressive decline in the nerve stimulation induced noradrenaline overflow. However, noradrenaline overflow induced by 40 mM K+ was enhanced by three- to fourfold in the energy depleted conditions. During anoxia, desipramine (0.3 microM) inhibited the spontaneous noradrenaline overflow and partly increased, in the early phase of anoxia, noradrenaline overflow by nerve stimulation, but showed no effect on K+ induced overflow. Further experiments showed that K+ at 10 mM failed to evoke noradrenaline overflow in normoxic hearts but induced a significant overflow in energy depleted hearts, either in the presence or absence of desipramine; quantities of noradrenaline overflow in response to 10-40 mM K+ were substantially higher in anoxia. This difference in noradrenaline overflow caused by K+ during normoxia and anoxia was partly narrowed by desipramine which enhanced overflow in normoxia. CONCLUSIONS: "Spontaneous" and exocytotic noradrenaline release coexist within the 30 min period of anoxia but their responses to Uptake1 inhibitor differ. K(+)-induced noradrenaline overflow was markedly augmented by energy depletion due to a combination of failed neuronal reuptake and enhanced exocytosis.

Animals↗

Imipramine metabolism in relation to the sparteine and mephenytoin oxidation polymorphisms--a population study.

1. Sparteine and mephenytoin phenotyping tests were carried out in 327 healthy Danish subjects. Two weeks later each subject took 25 mg imipramine followed by urine collection for 24 h. The urinary content of imipramine, desipramine, 2-hydroxy-imipramine and 2-hydroxy-desipramine was assayed by h.p.l.c. 2. The medians of the hydroxylation ratios (i.e. 2-hydroxy-metabolite over parent compound) were 6 to 14 times higher in 300 extensive metabolizers of sparteine (EMs) as compared with 27 poor metabolizers (PMs), but none of the ratios separated the two phenotypes completely. 3. There were 324 EM of mephenytoin (EMM) and three PM (PMM) in the sample. The demethylation ratios between desipramine, 2-hydroxy-desipramine and their corresponding tertiary amines showed statistically significant correlations with the mephenytoin S/R isomer ratio (Spearman's rs: -0.20 and -0.27, P < 0.05). 4. The demethylation ratios were higher in 80 smokers than in 245 non-smokers. This indicates that CYP1A2, which is induced by cigarette smoking, also catalyzes the N-demethylation of imipramine. 5. CYP2D6 genotyping was carried out by PCR in 325 of the subjects, and the D6-wt allele was amplified in 298 EMs, meaning that they were genotyped correctly. One PMs was D6-wt/D6-B, another PMs had the genotype D6-wt/ and hence both were misclassified as EMs. The remaining 25 PMs were D6-A/D6-B (n = 5), D6-B/ (n = 18) or D6-D/D6-D (no PCR amplification, n = 2).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗