Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “ENDOSCOPY”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,459 records · Page 81Linked to original sources

Stress response to endoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is often accompanied by tachycardia, which may lead to myocardial ischaemia. The pathogenesis for tachycardia is unknown, but the classic endocrine stress response may be of importance. METHODS: Seventeen patients (median age, 60 years) undergoing diagnostic gastroscopy without sedation or supplemental oxygen therapy were monitored by means of electrocardiogram, blood pressure, and pulse oximetry from 20 min before to 2 h after the procedure. Blood concentrations of glucose, cortisol, epinephrine, and norepinephrine were measured before, during, and after the endoscopy. Anxiety level was rated before the examination. RESULTS: Endoscopy was followed by a significant increase in norepinephrine and cortisol levels concomitant with a significant peak in heart rate (76 to 90 min(-1)) and mean arterial blood pressure (97 to 111 mmHg). Epinephrine was significantly reduced after the endoscopic procedure. We found no changes in glucose level or in arterial oxygen saturation. None of the patients developed signs of myocardial ischaemia during the procedure. There was no correlation between preendoscopy anxiety and the different stress variables (P > 0.3). CONCLUSIONS: The endoscopic procedure induces a classic endocrine metabolic stress response, probably causing the observed tachycardia.

Adult↗

Double-balloon endoscopy and Peutz-Jeghers syndrome: a new look at an old disease.

Peutz-Jeghers syndrome is a rare disease characterized by mucocutaneous hyperpigmentation and intestinal hamartomatous polyposis. Life-threatening complications include intestinal obstruction and increased risk of gastrointestinal malignancies. While colonoscopy continues to serve as the gold standard for examination of the colon, newer techniques such as capsule endoscopy and double-balloon endoscopy (DBE) are now being applied to both treatment and surveillance of this disease. Capsule endoscopy serves as a minimally invasive means of locating and characterizing polyps in symptomatic patients but is limited to detection only. DBE allows physicians to visit areas of the small bowel that were previously unreachable by older techniques and to treat lesions that are found. By using DBE to treat polyposis, hemorrhagic ulcers, angiodysplasia, strictures, and cancers, the number of small bowel resections can be decreased in these patients.

Journal Article↗

Virtual endoscopy using MRI.

Driven by major improvements in high resolution MR imaging 3D reconstructions and virtual endoscopy based on MRI have become possible. This article describes basic MR imaging techniques for 3D reconstructions. Principles of MRI-based virtual endoscopy are explained. Different 3D rendering methods are mentioned and discussed. Finally, clinical applications for MRI-based virtual endoscopy are described.

Journal Article↗

Virtual endoscopy using CT scan.

The term virtual endoscopy refers to using either spiral computed tomography (CT colonography) or magnetic resonance scanning (MR colonography) combined with computer technology to produce high-resolution two- and three-dimensional imaging of the large bowel. Current CT techniques require meticulous bowel preparation and gas insufflation prior to the examination. The advantages of CT colonography over conventional colonography include safety, its ability to demonstrate the entire large bowel in almost all patients, even following incomplete endoscopy, to accurately localize lesions, and to examine the entire colon in patients with obstructing tumors. Additionally, CT colonography allows simultaneous preoperative tumor staging. Screening for colorectal polyps is a controversially discussed indication for CT colonography. Sensitivity and specificity range widely and decrease with decreasing polyp size. However, better results can be achieved using multidetector technology. Most frequently, the examination is well tolerated and assessed by patients to be more acceptable than conventional colonoscopy. There are no reported complications from CT colonography. The procedure requires a scan time of about 25 to 30 seconds with new multidetector CT scanners, and sedation is not used. Currently, CT colonography is less cost-effective than conventional endoscopy. Another disadvantage is the relatively high irradiation exposure associated with CT colonography. Therefore, at the moment, this technique does not appear ready to be included in general screening strategies. However, ongoing and future improvements may prove its value in colorectal examination strategies.

Journal Article↗

Infection control practices in gastrointestinal endoscopy in the United States: a national survey.

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain current infection control practices, endoscope cleaning procedures, perceived risks of infection, and implementation of universal precautions in gastrointestinal endoscopy units in the United States. DESIGN: National mailed survey of gastroenterology nurses and associates conducted anonymously in March 1988. SETTING: Completed surveys were received from all 50 states and Puerto Rico and from all practice settings. The most common practice setting was private/community hospitals (66%). PARTICIPANTS: Of the 4,952 survey forms mailed to all members and to interested nonmembers of the Society of Gastrointestinal Nurses and Associates, 2,158 (44%) were returned and 2,030 (41%) were completed and evaluable. Of the respondents, 1,487 (73%) were registered nurses. RESULTS: Sixty-seven percent (n = 1,358) of the respondents routinely used an enzymatic cleaner as a step in the instrument decontamination process; 93% (n = 1,879) chemically disinfected instruments after each case; and 88% (n = 1,779) disinfected endoscopes with an aqueous glutaraldehyde product. Respondents reported that they and a significantly smaller proportion of physicians (p less than .001) employed barrier precautions for all endoscopic cases involving possible contact with blood/body fluids of patients known (66% versus 57%, respectively) and not known (12% versus 8%, respectively) to have a bloodborne infection. Endoscopy-related infections, usually bacterial, were reported to have occurred at their institutions by 6% (n = 116) of respondents. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that cleaning, disinfection, and sterilization procedures for gastrointestinal endoscopic instruments vary, that appropriate protective apparel is not always worn, and that some practices may lead to preventable endoscopy-related infection in patients.

Bacterial Infections↗

Are endoscopy nurses at risk of infection with Helicobacter pylori from their work?

BACKGROUND: In response to studies suggesting risk of occupational transmission of Helicobacter pylori (HP) to endoscopy staff, this cross-sectional study of seroprevalence to HP in gastroscopy nurses working in West of Scotland hospitals (an area of high endemicity of HP infection) was performed to determine if they were at excess risk relative to peers working in surgical specialities but without gastroscopy exposure. The study aimed to fulfil employer's duties to carry out a suitable risk assessment required by health and safety legislation. METHOD: This cross-sectional study compares the seroprevalence of HP in gastroscopy nurses and comparators drawn from orthopaedic and trauma units in 10 hospitals during 1998. A directly administered questionnaire collated exposure information on occupational and non-occupational risk factors for infection. Venepuncture was performed for latex agglutination test for IgG to HP. Confounding by socio-economic factors was controlled for by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Of the 222 participants, 74 were endoscopy staff (84% response) and 148 (59%) were comparators. Of these, 32.4% of gastroscopy and 33% of comparators were seropositive for HP (OR 0.97, P > 0.9, 95% CI 0.5-1.8). No association was found between gastroscopy exposure variables (frequency, years) or exposure to all endoscopy procedures and HP. Significant associations were found for age, childhood deprivation and greater number of siblings. CONCLUSION: No excess HP infection was found in gastroscopy nurses. Duties imposed by the health and safety legislation appear discharged by normal infection control procedures. Socio-economic factors are key determinants of HP status.

Adult↗

Evaluation of the efficacy and comparative effects on gastric and duodenal mucosa of etodolac and naproxen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using endoscopy.

The therapeutic efficacy and upper gastrointestinal side effects of a twice daily dose of 300 mg etodolac and 500 mg naproxen were compared in 30 hospital out-patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. Drugs were taken for 4 weeks in a double-blind, randomized, parallel group, single centre study. Rheumatological, endoscopic and laboratory assessments were performed at the start and on completion of the study. Mucosal lesions developed in only three (20%) patients of the etodolac group and they all had low endoscopy scores, compared to eight (53%) patients of the naproxen group with significantly worse endoscopy scores (p less than 0.05). Lesions were asymptomatic in all but one patient (on naproxen), and the gastric antrum was the commonest region involved. Of the 11 patients who developed endoscopic abnormalities in both groups, seven (64%) were moderate to heavy smokers. Etodolac had a similar antiarthritic effect to naproxen, but it appears to be better tolerated by the upper gastrointestinal mucosa as shown by endoscopy.

Adult↗

Endoscopy in colonic volvulus.

Flexible fiberoptic gastrointestinal endoscopy has greatly simplified the diagnosis and treatment of colonic volvulus. The management of 39 patients with colonic volvulus treated over 9 years was reviewed. Five per cent were treated with rectal tube decompression alone, 23% were treated with either sigmoidoscopic or colonoscopic reduction, and 26% were treated exclusively with operation. Endoscopic reduction was attempted in nearly half of the patients in preparation for operation. Recurrent volvulus occurred in 57% of patients initially treated with endoscopic reduction alone. Sigmoidoscopic examination did not confirm the diagnosis in 24% of instances in which it was used, although colonoscopy was always diagnostic. The overall mortality rate was 8%, but increased to 25% in patients with gangrene of the colon. Three patients who later proved to have gangrene of the colon had a normal initial sigmoidoscopic examination. Two of these patients died of intra-abdominal sepsis from a perforated colon. In five patients an accurate endoscopic diagnosis of gangrene prompted immediate exploration. None of these patients died. Endoscopy is a safe and effective diagnostic tool for the initial evaluation of patients with suspected colon volvulus. In addition, endoscopy may result in therapeutic decompression and may provide visual assessment of the viability of the bowel mucosa, thus assisting in the timing of appropriate operative treatment.

Aged↗

Interventional endoscopy.

Technologic milestones have been achieved in the field of interventional endoscopy. These have resulted in improved hemostasis, more accurate cancer staging, safer and less invasive methods of removing gastric neoplasms, and endoscopic palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction via stenting. However, just as these milestones are achieved, new challenges emerge: (1) How much sedation can one use safely? (2) What is the risk of transmitting infection and how can that be prevented? (3) Can scopes be made smaller and more comfortable? (4) Can optics be improved? (5) Can endoscopic repair of gastric perforations be safely performed? In this section, we review some of these issues. First, we will provide an update on the most recent concepts in the field of light sedation and infection control. Then, a review of the most commonly used interventional endoscopy procedures, including hemostasis, endosonography, endoscopic mucosal resection, stenting, and percutaneous gastrostomy tube placements. Finally, an overview of the ongoing research and development in the field of interventional endoscopy and how it can improve patient comfort, diagnostic accuracy, therapeutic efficacy, and training in the future.

Journal Article↗

Video capsule endoscopy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The small bowel has been a difficult organ for gastroenterologists to evaluate. Small bowel radiographs and CT scanning have not had a high diagnostic rate, especially in patients presenting with small bowel bleeding. The video capsule "endoscope" has allowed for the direct visualization of the small bowel mucosa. This new technique provides direct viewing of the entire small bowel much like conventional endoscopy. RECENT FINDINGS: A series of studies have shown that video capsule endoscopy (VCE) is superior to barium radiography studies, CT scanning, and push enteroscopy for diagnosing disorders of the small bowel. Numerous case reports of angioectasias, Crohn disease, small bowel tumors, and other small bowel disorders have been reported. A recent study proposes that VCE helped to direct therapy and had a great impact in patient care. SUMMARY: Capsule endoscopy provides higher rates and more accurate diagnosis of small bowel diseases. The future of this technology could improve the ability to visualize the small bowel and improve the treatment of patients with small bowel disorders.

Journal Article↗

X-ray-negative dysphagia: is endoscopy necessary?

We reviewed our experience with patients with symptoms of dysphagia to determine whether endoscopy increased the chance of finding esophageal carcinoma when barium studies of the esophagus were normal. Endoscopy reports from 1974 to 1982 identified 195 patients with x-ray-negative dysphagia. In no patient was esophageal carcinoma found endoscopically. When patients with hiatal hernia (22) or endoscopic Grade I or II esophagitis (52) were excluded, only eight patients were found to have an endoscopic abnormality not demonstrated previously by x-ray. In addition, 56 cases of esophageal carcinoma seen at our institution over the same period all showed abnormal barium esophagrams at the time of presentation. We conclude that endoscopy to exclude esophageal carcinoma in patients with dysphagia is not as necessary as claimed, at least when adequate barium studies of the esophagus are normal.

Adolescent↗

Perspectives of chromo and magnifying endoscopy: how, how much, when, and whom should we stain?

The goal of every routine endoscopy in the gut is the early diagnosis of malignant and premalignant changes of the mucosa. Chromo- and magnifying endoscopes are exciting new tools and offer detailed analysis of the colonic mucosal surface and pit pattern architecture. This review summarizes recent advances in endoscopic characterization of colorectal lesions using magnification endoscopy and chromoendoscopy. Surface analysis of the colon using chromoendoscopy allows a prediction between non-neoplastic and neoplastic lesions with high specificity. The precise delineation of the borders and a more detailed macroscopic analysis of the lesions are further advantages. In particular, flat adenomas and early depressed cancers are now more frequently recognized in western countries suggesting that significant lesions were overlooked by conventional endoscopy in the past. Furthermore, chromoendoscopy can be used in a targeted fashion to screen for sporadic adenomas. Finally, in surveillance colonoscopy, patients with long-standing ulcerative colitis have a valuable benefit if targeted biopsies are performed to detect intraepithelial neoplasias after pan-chromoendoscopy with methylene blue. Although there is a long learning curve, chromoendoscopy should thus belong to every endoscopists armamentarium. However, detailed knowledge about the technique, dyes, and specific staining patterns are mandatory before the yield of screening or surveillance colonoscopy can be increased. The new detailed images seen with magnifying chromoendoscopy are unequivocally the beginning of a new era where new optical developments will allow a unique look on cellular structures.

Adenoma↗

Applications of gastrointestinal endoscopy in infants and children.

Gastrointestinal endoscopy has become an integral part of defining and treating gastrointestinal disease in children. Premalignant conditions that have been identified by endoscopy with histologic evaluation include Barrett's esophagus, juvenile polyposis coli, generalized juvenile polyposis, familial polyposis, Gardner's syndrome, and Turcot's syndrome. Advances in endoscopic instrumentation has allowed successful endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) to be performed in infants and children. Therapeutic ERCP has been performed to remove stones, ligate strictures, and place stents. This review focuses on selected advances in gastrointestinal endoscopy and related diseases.

Age Factors↗

Defining a proper setting for endoscopy in coeliac disease.

OBJECTIVE: As it has been demonstrated that a careful duodenal inspection during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy may be useful in predicting coeliac disease, we tried to define the usefulness of endoscopy in detecting unsuspected coeliac patients. DESIGN AND METHODS: We considered all the first diagnoses of coeliac disease from 1992 to 2001, i.e. 110 patients with a biopsy-proven diagnosis of coeliac disease. From 1992 to 1997, neither of the endoscopists paid careful attention to the endoscopic features of coeliac disease in the course of the examinations performed for indications other than coeliac disease. From 1998 to 2001, the same endoscopists looked very carefully at these endoscopic features, regardless of the indication for the procedure. RESULTS: Over the first period, 22/16,081 patients endoscoped for the first time had a histological diagnosis of coeliac disease, with a prevalence of 1/731. In all 22 patients the indication for the examination was the suspicion of coeliac disease. The endoscopic appearance of the duodenum was indicative in 16/22 (72.7%) patients. Over the second period, the diagnosis of coeliac disease was made in 88/10,410 patients endoscoped for the first time. The prevalence of the disease was 1/118 examinations performed. The endoscopic appearance of the duodenum was indicative in 70/88 (79.5%) patients. In 13/88 patients, the diagnosis of coeliac disease was presumed because of the macroscopic appearance of duodenum, lacking a past history suggestive of coeliac disease. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a still open controversy on the accuracy of endoscopic markers in the diagnosis of coeliac disease, we have found that in subjects not suspected for coeliac disease and undergoing an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for other reasons, attention to the endoscopic pattern could facilitate the identification of a relevant number of cases.

Adult↗

International validation of ReQuest in patients with endoscopy-negative gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

BACKGROUND: Reflux Questionnaire (ReQuest), a newly developed gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-sensitive scale, can be used to reliably evaluate the effect of treatment on gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms. AIM: International validation of this scale, in patients suffering from endoscopy-negative gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. METHODS: In this open, multicentre and multinational clinical trial 840 endoscopy-negative gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients received pantoprazole 20 mg daily for 28 days. The long and short versions of ReQuest were completed both in the pre-treatment and treatment phases. For scale development an item reduction analysis was performed. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability and responsiveness were calculated for psychometric analysis. Construct validity was evaluated by comparison with the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale and the Psychological General Well-being questionnaire by means of correlation coefficients. RESULTS: Factor analyses confirmed the content validity of both long and short version of ReQuest. Psychometric calculations proved high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha: 0.9), test-retest reliability [Intraclass Correlation Coefficient: 0.9 (long vs. long) and 0.8 (short vs. short)], and responsiveness (Responsiveness Index 320.3) of the scale, for which also good construct validity was achieved (correlation coefficient: Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale -0.6; Psychological General Well-being -0.4). CONCLUSION: ReQuest proved valid, reliable, and responsive in this multinational clinical trial to evaluate treatment response in endoscopy-negative gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients.

Adult↗

In vivo culture of IVM/IVF embryos in bovine oviducts by transvaginal endoscopy.

This study was conducted to establish a new approach for in vivo culture of in vitro produced embryos in the bovine oviduct by transvaginal endoscopy. Embryos were in vitro matured, fertilized and cultured for 1-4 days and assigned to groups consisting of 10-30 embryos. Embryos were transferred unilaterally into oviducts of 24 heifers by the means of transvaginal endoscopy. After 3-6 days of in vivo incubation embryos were re-collected. Experiment I aimed to evaluate the capability of embryos to migrate to the uterus. The uterine horns of four animals were flushed first, followed by a combined flushing of both oviducts and uterine horns resulting in collection rates of 31 and 34%, respectively. In experiment II, the transfer of embryos into the oviduct close to ovulation (day 1-2--experiment IIA) or at a more advanced cyclic stage (day 3--experiment IIB) succeeded in the collection of 46 and 34% of the transferred complexes, of which 13 and 37% showed the blastocyst stage. This is the first report of successful recovery of transferable blastocysts by transvaginal endoscopy after tubal in vivo culture in the homologous species of originally in vitro produced embryos.

Animals↗

Should preoperative, post-chemoradiotherapy endoscopy be routine for esophageal cancer patients?

Chemoradiation therapy is used widely for locoregional esophageal cancer. Patients with persistent disease may benefit from surgery. Preoperative esophagoscopy can identify persistent tumor but its accuracy is uncertain. The primary objective of this study is to assess the extent of agreement between esophagoscopy and surgical pathology in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation. A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent chemoradiation, preoperative endoscopy and surgery from January 1996 to December 2002 was performed. Cohen's kappa statistic was used to measure the degree of agreement between findings at endoscopic biopsy and surgical pathology. Thirty cases were identified. All patients received chemoradiation followed by surgical resection. There was insufficient agreement between tumor size (kappa 0.25, standard error 0.17, P = 0.07) and appearance (kappa 0.19, standard error 0.18, P = 0.14). Preoperative endoscopy revealed atypia/inflammation in 15 cases and dysplasia in eight. Of these 23 cases, 11 were adenocarcinomas at surgery. Only nine patients had concurrence between surgical pathology and endoscopy. The positive and negative predictive values of esophagoscopy for identifying residual tumor were 100% and 11%, respectively. Our data suggests that after chemoradiation, esophagoscopy is unreliable for excluding residual disease. The roles of other modalities need to be explored.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Disappointing sensitivity of endoscopic markers for villous atrophy in a high-risk population: implications for celiac disease diagnosis during routine endoscopy.

OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic markers of duodenal villous atrophy (VA) can facilitate diagnosis of celiac disease during routine upper GI endoscopy. We studied their sensitivity for VA in a large series of patients undergoing GI endoscopy specifically for duodenal biopsy. Poor sensitivity in this setting would have significant and adverse implications for their performance during routine endoscopy. METHODS: All patients with VA on duodenal biopsy performed for positive serum endomysial antibody (EmA) and/or clinical features suggestive of celiac disease were included. The second part of duodenum was inspected carefully for endoscopic markers using videogastroscopes. RESULTS: Of 129 patients studied, 99 (77%) had at least one endoscopic markers. The most commonly seen marker were a mosaic pattern mucosa (68 patients, 53%) and scalloping of duodenal folds (74 patients, 57%). The prevalence of markers was significantly lower for partial VA (15 of 26 patients, 58%) than for subtotal or total VA (84 of 103 patients, 82%) (p < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic markers have disappointing sensitivity even in a population at high risk of celiac disease, particularly for partial VA. Their performance may be even poorer in an unselected dyspeptic population. Although they may help improve diagnosis rates among patients with nonspecific dyspeptic symptoms, many patients, particularly those with milder enteropathy, will be missed. As celiac disease is an important cause of dyspepsia, consideration should be given to serological screening to further improve diagnosis rates, as few centers will have the resources to routinely biopsy all patients.

Adolescent↗