Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “replication”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,441 records · Page 80Linked to original sources

Genome-wide hierarchy of replication origin usage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Replication origins in a genome are inherently different in their base sequence and in their response to temporal and cell cycle regulation signals for DNA replication. To investigate the chromosomal determinants that influence the efficiency of initiation of DNA replication genome-wide, we made use of a reverse strategy originally used for the isolation of replication initiation mutants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In yeast, replication origins isolated from chromosomes support the autonomous replication of plasmids. These replication origins, whether in the context of a chromosome or a plasmid, will initiate efficiently in wild-type cells but show a dramatically contrasted efficiency of activation in mutants defective in the early steps of replication initiation. Serial passages of a genomic library of autonomously replicating sequences (ARSs) in such a mutant allowed us to select for constitutively active ARSs. We found a hierarchy of preferential initiation of ARSs that correlates with local transcription patterns. This preferential usage is enhanced in mutants defective in the assembly of the prereplication complex (pre-RC) but not in mutants defective in the activation of the pre-RC. Our findings are consistent with an interference of local transcription with the assembly of the pre-RC at a majority of replication origins.

DNA, Fungal↗

Flow cytometry and FISH to investigate allele-specific replication timing and homologous association of imprinted chromosomes.

Chromosome replication banding studies show that homologous regions on a pair of autosomes generally replicate at the same time in S phase (1). Izumikawa et al. first observed that this was not the case for the imprinted chromosomal region 15q11-q13 (2). This observation has been confirmed in other replication banding studies (3) as well by the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) replication assay (4-9). The latter technique has also been used to observe DNA replication asynchrony in association with allelic inactivation of genes such as those encoding olfactory receptors and the cytokine, interleukin 2 (10,11). The latter genes are not imprinted but display random silencing of an allele in individual cells. In imprinted regions, DNA replication was generally observed to occur earlier on the paternal homologue (5,6,9,12,13). The patterns of allele-specific replication in the cells of Prader- Willi (PWS) and Angelman syndrome (AS) patients, however, have generally been synchronous (5,6,14). Furthermore, an investigation of the kinetics of allele-specific replication timing in the GABRB3/A5 cluster on 15q11-13 revealed that cells from PWS and AS have lost the strict replication timing observed on the parental chromosomes of normal cells (12). These results suggested the requirement of a biparental contribution for the regulation of replication asynchrony and lead to the hypothesis that allelic cross-talk, perhaps via pairing of homologous chromosomes, might play a role in the imprinting process.

Alleles↗

Eucaryotic replication origin binding proteins.

Initiation of eukaryotic DNA replication is a tightly controlled process. Replication initiates at multiple specific sites (replication origins) that have been licensed for replication, following the cell cycle-dependent, multi-step assembly of specific factors. Thus, replication origins occur in two chromatin states: a replication-competent pre-replicative (pre-RC) state, when a number of replication proteins assemble on the origin in a stepwise fashion, and a replication-incompetent post-replicative (post-RC) state, in which the origin (or elements of it) is bound only by the origin recognition complex (ORC) (or subunits of it). This review summarizes the origin binding proteins that have been have been identified to date.

14-3-3 Proteins↗

Chromatin remodeling and initiation of DNA replication.

While much has been learned in recent years about the process of chromatin remodeling and its role in activation of transcription, relatively little has been reported on the role of chromatin remodeling in DNA replication. However, it is well established that transcription factors and chromatin structure play an important role in replication origin usage. Recent work has begun to indicate that chromatin remodeling factors are likely to play an important role in the regulation of replication origin usage. The results to date are most consistent with the role for chromatin remodeling factors in DNA replication as being indirect, and very similar to their role in transcription. The current evidence suggests that transcription factors bind to auxiliary sequences adjacent to replication origins and recruit chromatin remodeling factors to create either nucleosome-free regions or regions of specifically spaced nucleosomes. This results in activation of the nearby origin, presumably by making the origin region more accessible to replication factors. Until recently, there has been very little evidence of direct interactions between chromatin remodeling factors and the DNA replication machinery. Recent studies have provided data indicating that direct interactions may exist between chromatin remodeling factors and two cellular replication factors, the Origin Recognition Complex and Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen. However, since these replication factors are also involved in other nuclear processes, such as transcriptional silencing and DNA repair, respectively, further study is necessary to establish whether these direct interactions are also important for DNA replication.

Animals↗

Turning the replication checkpoint on and off.

The replication checkpoint monitors the progress of DNA replication forks during S phase, and delays the firing of later replication origins when active replication forks are stalled due to collisions with damaged or abnormally structured DNA. Key components of the replication checkpoint pathway are the apical protein kinase, ATR, and its downstream target kinase, Chk1. Defects in either ATR or Chk1 function result in loss of DNA replication fidelity and cell viability, even in the absence of extrinsic genotoxic stress. Moreover, several clinically important antitumor agents, such as the camptothecins (CPTs), exert their antitumor effects by interfering with DNA replication, and hence the therapeutic response to these drugs is intimately related to signaling through the replication checkpoint. A recent report from this laboratory adds a new facet to the regulatory mechanisms that control the function and duration of checkpoint signaling through the ATR-Chk1 pathway. The results indicate that replication stress induced by a variety of agents, including CPT and deep hypoxia, triggers the ubiquitin-dependent degradation of the checkpoint kinase Chk1 in both normal and transformed human cells. This review provides an overview of the study's major findings, together with their implications for both replication checkpoint function and tumor responsiveness to CPT and related anticancer drugs.

Checkpoint Kinase 1↗

Antitumor drug adozelesin differentially affects active and silent origins of DNA replication in yeast checkpoint kinase mutants.

The antitumor drug adozelesin is a potent cytotoxic DNA-damaging agent. Here we determined how adozelesin affects chromosomal DNA replication at a molecular level in a yeast model system and examined the influence of checkpoint kinase genes, the human homologues of which are mutated in cancer. Analysis of replication intermediates using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis showed that adozelesin inhibited the activity of a replication origin and stalled replication fork progression through chromosomal DNA at the origin. RAD53 and MEC1 protein kinase genes, homologues of human CHK2 and ATM, respectively, regulate an intra-S-phase DNA damage checkpoint and, when mutated, permit unchecked replication of damaged DNA in S-phase. Mutations in these genes did not abrogate adozelesin-induced inhibition of origin activity and fork progression at the replication origin. However, novel replication intermediates indicative of DNA breaks were detected only in the rad53 mutant, suggesting a role for the wild-type gene in maintaining chromosome integrity in the presence of the drug. In contrast to the inhibition of the active replication origin by adozelesin, normally silent origins present in the same chromosome were activated by adozelesin in rad53 and mec1 mutant cells. Thus, an antitumor drug that damages DNA can induce an abnormal replication pattern in a chromosome by activating silent origins, depending upon defects in yeast checkpoint kinase genes, the homologues of which are mutated in cancer. Implications of an abnormal replication pattern for the epigenetic regulation of gene expression are discussed.

Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating↗

Mechanism of stimulation of DNA replication by bacteriophage phi 29 single-stranded DNA-binding protein p5.

Protein p5 is a Bacillus subtilis phage phi 29-encoded protein required for phi 29 DNA replication in vivo. Protein p5 has single-stranded DNA binding (SSB) capacity and stimulates in vitro DNA replication severalfold when phi 29 DNA polymerase is used to replicate either the natural phi 29 DNA template or primed M13 single-stranded DNA (ssDNA). Furthermore, other SSB proteins, including Escherichia coli SSB, T4 gp32, adenovirus DNA-binding protein, and human replication factor A, can functionally substitute for protein p5. The stimulatory effect of phi 29 protein p5 is not due to an increase of the DNA replication rate. When both phi 29 DNA template and M13 competitor ssDNA are added simultaneously to the replication reaction, phi 29 DNA replication is strongly inhibited. This inhibition is fully overcome by adding protein p5, suggesting that protein p5-coated M13 ssDNA is no longer able to compete for replication factors, probably phi 29 DNA polymerase, which has a strong affinity for ssDNA. Electron microscopy demonstrates that protein p5 binds to M13 ssDNA forming saturated complexes with a smoothly contoured appearance and producing a 2-fold reduction of the DNA length. Protein p5 also binds to ssDNA in the phi 29 replicative intermediates produced in vitro, which are similar in structure to those observed in vivo. Our results strongly suggest that phi 29 protein p5 is the phi 29 SSB protein active during phi 29 DNA replication.

Bacillus subtilis↗

Identification of cellular proteins required for simian virus 40 DNA replication.

Study of the proteins involved in DNA replication of a model system such as SV40 is a first step in understanding eukaryotic chromosomal replication. Using a cell-free system that is capable of replicating plasmid DNA molecules containing the SV40 origin of replication, we conducted a series of systematic fractionation-reconstitution experiments for the purpose of identifying and characterizing the cellular proteins involved in SV40 DNA replication. In addition to the one viral-encoded replication protein, T antigen, we have identified and begun to characterize at least six cellular components from a HeLa cytoplasmic extract that are absolutely required for SV40 DNA replication in vitro. These include: (i) two partially purified fractions, CF IC and CF IIA, and (ii) four proteins that have been purified to near homogeneity, replication protein-A, proliferating cell nuclear antigen, DNA polymerase alpha-primase complex, and topoisomerase (I and II). Replication protein-A is a multi-subunit protein that has single-stranded DNA binding activity and is required for a T antigen-dependent, origin-dependent unwinding reaction which may be an important early step in initiation of replication. Fraction CF IC can stimulate this unwinding reaction, suggesting that it also may function during initiation. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen, DNA polymerase alpha-primase, and CF IIA all appear to be involved in elongation of nascent chains.

Antigens, Viral, Tumor↗

Rhinovirus replication in HeLa cells cultured under conditions of simulated microgravity.

BACKGROUND: Rotating-wall vessels (RWVs) allow for the growth of cells under conditions of simulated microgravity. Information about the replication of viruses in simulated microgravity using RWVs has not been reported. Cells grown in RWVs are subjected to low shear motion, and the replication of certain viruses such as rhinoviruses has been reported to be enhanced by motion. HYPOTHESIS: Our research was based on the hypothesis that rhinovirus replication would be enhanced under conditions of simulated microgravity. METHODS: HeLa cells were cultured in three-dimensional cultures on microcarrier beads in simulated microgravity using RWVs and in sealed Teflon roller bottles. Two-dimensional cultures of HeLa cells were also grown in tissue culture flasks (T-150s). Viral infections for all cultures were carried out under standardized conditions at 1 x g. The amount of new virus released during the first viral replication cycle and the total viral yields obtained from multiple viral replication cycles were determined. RESULTS: Viral quantitation during the first viral replication cycle showed that after 10-13 h RWV and Teflon roller bottle supernatants contained significantly more virus than the supernatants from T-150 cultures. After multiple viral replication cycles (at 24, 48, 72, and 96 h following infection), total viral samples (both free and cell-associated virus) from RWV cultures contained significantly more virus than Teflon roller bottle cultures. CONCLUSIONS: The rhinovirus replication cycle was enhanced in cultures grown in the presence of motion (Teflon roller bottle cultures and RWV cultures). Additionally, multiple rounds of rhinovirus replication yielded more virus in simulated microgravity conditions. Viral transmission in cell cultures in RWVs was efficient and was similar to or better than what occurred in the Teflon roller bottles. The cultivation of cells in simulated microgravity possibly affected the rate of viral adsorption/uptake, the viral replication cycle, and/or the viral yield. RWVs provide an effective means for culturing human rhinoviruses.

Cell Culture Techniques↗

Transgene sequence codon optimization and composition determines replication competence of self-amplifying RNA.

Self-amplifying RNA (saRNA) is an emerging RNA therapeutic modality that can facilitate higher magnitude and more durable protein expression at substantially lower doses than nonreplicating mRNA. Unlike conventional messenger RNA (mRNA), alphavirus-derived saRNA must support a replicase-driven RNA amplification step in addition to translation, raising the possibility that transgene coding sequences impose sequence-level constraints on replication. Here, saRNA replication was found to be dependent on the codon composition of the transgene; multiple therapeutic transgenes were replication defective despite an intact Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis Virus (VEEV)-derived saRNA backbone. Replication defects were rescued by synonymous codon re-optimization of the same transgenes, indicating that nucleotide-level features of the coding sequence, rather than the encoded protein, govern replication competence. Comparative compositional analyses identified a distinct signature associated with productive replication, characterized by elevated GC (>53%) and GC3 (>63%) content, higher codon adaptation to human (>0.75), and reduced UpA (<43/kb) and UpU (<41/kb) dinucleotide density. Moreover, deliberate compositional perturbation of an otherwise replication-competent transgene shifted these features and abolished replication, supporting a causal and combinatorial role for sequence composition in defining saRNA replication outcome. These findings define an underappreciated constraint in saRNA therapeutics and motivate saRNA-specific payload design frameworks that incorporate alphavirus-associated compositional biases during transgene sequence optimization.

Codon↗

PARP1 UFMylation ensures the stability of stalled replication forks.

The S-phase checkpoint involving CHK1 is essential for fork stability in response to fork stalling. PARP1 acts as a sensor of replication stress and is required for CHK1 activation. However, it is unclear how the activity of PARP1 is regulated. Here, we found that UFMylation is required for the efficient activation of CHK1 by UFMylating PARP1 at K548 during replication stress. Inactivation of UFL1, the E3 enzyme essential for UFMylation, delayed CHK1 activation and inhibits nascent DNA degradation during replication blockage as seen in PARP1-deficient cells. An in vitro study indicated that PARP1 is UFMylated at K548, which enhances its catalytic activity. Correspondingly, a PARP1 UFMylation-deficient mutant (K548R) and pathogenic mutant (F553L) compromised CHK1 activation, the restart of stalled replication forks following replication blockage, and chromosome stability. Defective PARP1 UFMylation also resulted in excessive nascent DNA degradation at stalled replication forks. Finally, we observed that PARP1 UFMylation-deficient knock-in mice exhibited increased sensitivity to replication stress caused by anticancer treatments. Thus, we demonstrate that PARP1 UFMylation promotes CHK1 activation and replication fork stability during replication stress, thus safeguarding genome integrity.

DNA Replication↗

Replication of herpes simplex virus type 1 DNA is inhibited in a temperature-sensitive mutant of BHK-21 cells lacking RCC1 (regulator of chromosome condensation) and virus DNA remains linear.

tsBN2, a temperature-sensitive (ts) growth mutant of the hamster cell line BHK-21, has a point mutation in the RCC1 (regulator of chromosome condensation) gene, and prematurely enters mitosis at 39.5 degrees C, a nonpermissive temperature. In this mutant at 39.5 degrees C infectious progeny of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) was not produced and replication of HSV-1 DNA was inhibited. HSV-1 DNA from virus particles is normally circularized upon infection, and circularized HSV-1 DNA molecules can serve as template for DNA replication. In tsBN2 at 39.5 degrees C, HSV-1 DNA appeared to remain linear after infection, suggesting the obstruction of HSV-1 DNA circularization, which could account for failure of HSV-1 DNA replication. In transient replication assays performed in tsBN2 at 39.5 degrees C, through superinfection with HSV-1 helper virus, there was no evidence of replication of circular DNA of the hybrid plasmid containing the HSV-1 replication origin. Production of mRNAs of HSV-1 early genes required for HSV-1 DNA replication was decreased in tsBN2 at 39.5 degrees C. Therefore, RCC1 was assumed to be involved in the formation of an HSV-1 DNA configuration suitable for replication (that is circularization) and the supply of proteins required for replication of the circularized HSV-1 DNAs.

Animals↗

The Epstein-Barr virus replication protein BBLF2/3 provides an origin-tethering function through interaction with the zinc finger DNA binding protein ZBRK1 and the KAP-1 corepressor.

Herpesviruses encode a set of core proteins essential for lytic replication of their genomes. Three of these proteins form a tripartite helix-primase complex that, in the case of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), consists of the helicase BBLF4, the primase BSLF1, and the linker protein BBLF2/3. BBLF2/3 and its homologs in the other herpesviruses remain relatively poorly characterized. To better understand the contribution to replication made by BBLF2/3, a yeast two-hybrid screen was performed with BBLF2/3 as the bait protein. This screen identified as interactors a number of cell replication-related proteins such as DNA polymerase beta and subunits of DNA polymerase delta along with the EBV-encoded DNase BGLF5. The screen also identified the DNA binding zinc finger protein ZBRK1 and the ZBRK1 corepressor KAP-1 as BBLF2/3 interactors. Interaction between BBLF2/3 and ZBRK1 and KAP-1 was confirmed in coimmunoprecipitation assays. A binding site for ZBRK1 in the EBV oriLyt enhancer was identified by electrophoretic mobility shift assay. ZBRK1, KAP-1, and the ZBRK1 binding protein BRCA1 were shown by indirect immunofluorescence to be present in replication compartments in lytically induced D98-HR1 cells, and additionally, chromatin immunoprecipitation assays determined that these proteins associated with oriLyt DNA. Replication of an oriLyt plasmid and a variant oriLyt (DeltaZBRK1) plasmid was examined in lytically induced D98-HR1 cells. Exogenous ZBRK1, KAP-1, or BRCA1 increased the efficiency of oriLyt replication, while deletion of the ZBRK1 binding site impaired replication. These experiments identify ZBRK1 as another cell protein that, through BBLF2/3, provides a tethering point on oriLyt for the EBV replication complex. The data also suggest that BBLF2/3 may serve as a contact interface for cell proteins involved in replication of EBV oriLyt.

Animals↗

Differentiation-independent activation of HPV genome replication by the lncRNA DINO.

Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) rely on multiple host cell factors to replicate the viral genome, yet the contribution of host long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) to viral genome maintenance and amplification in the productive life cycle remains poorly understood. In this study, we show that the lncRNA damage-induced long non-coding RNA (DINO) is a driver of HPV DNA replication. DINO levels increase during keratinocyte differentiation, and ectopic expression of DINO promotes both HPV genome replication and the formation of replication foci, and this is independent of keratinocyte differentiation signals. Ectopic DINO expression increases select early viral transcript levels, including E1^E4, E1, and E2. Notably, DINO's subcellular localization is also context-dependent: during DNA damage, DINO is predominantly cytoplasmic, but during keratinocyte differentiation, nuclear retention is observed. This differential localization suggests that DINO has distinct functional roles in keratinocyte differentiation and HPV biology. Our findings highlight DINO as a lncRNA that promotes HPV genome replication and suggest that lncRNAs may play underappreciated roles in host-virus interactions. This work provides a foundation for further exploration of lncRNAs as potential therapeutic targets in HPV-associated diseases.IMPORTANCEHuman papillomaviruses (HPVs) are the causative agents of many anogenital tract and oral cancers, yet the host factors that trigger and support viral genome replication during the productive life cycle are incompletely understood. This study identifies the long non-coding RNA DINO as a host regulator that promotes HPV DNA replication, replication focus formation, and early viral gene expression independently of keratinocyte differentiation. We further show that DINO exhibits context-dependent subcellular localization, suggesting distinct functional roles in cellular stress responses and HPV biology. These findings reveal an underappreciated role for host lncRNAs in virus-host interactions and provide new insight into cellular pathways that support HPV genome replication.

Virus Replication↗

Simian virus 40 origin- and T-antigen-dependent DNA replication with Drosophila factors in vitro.

DNA replication of double-stranded simian virus 40 (SV40) origin-containing plasmids, which has been previously thought to be a species-specific process that occurs only with factors derived from primate cells, is catalyzed with an extract derived from embryos of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. This reaction is dependent upon both large T antigen, the SV40-encoded replication initiator protein and DNA helicase, and a functional T-antigen binding site at the origin of DNA replication. The efficiency of replication with extracts derived from Drosophila embryos is approximately 10% of that observed with extracts prepared from human 293 cells. This activity is not a unique property of embryonic extracts, as cytoplasmic extracts from Drosophila tissue culture cells also support T-antigen-mediated replication of SV40 DNA. By using highly purified proteins, DNA synthesis is initiated by Drosophila polymerase alpha-primase in a T-antigen-dependent manner in the presence of Drosophila replication protein A (RP-A; also known as single-stranded DNA-binding protein), but neither human RP-A nor Escherichia coli single-stranded DNA-binding protein could substitute for Drosophila RP-A. In reciprocal experiments, however, Drosophila RP-A was able to substitute for human RP-A in reactions carried out with human polymerase alpha-primase. These results collectively indicate that many of the specific functional interactions among T antigen, polymerase alpha-primase, and RP-A are conserved from primates to Drosophila species. Moreover, the observation that SV40 DNA replication can be performed with Drosophila factors provides a useful assay for the study of bidirectional DNA replication in Drosophila species in the context of a complete replication reaction.

Animals↗

Regulation of replication timing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

In order to maintain genomic integrity, DNA replication must be highly coordinated. Disruptions in this process can cause replication stress which is aberrant in many pathologies including cancer. Despite this, little is known about the mechanisms governing the temporal regulation of DNA replication initiation, thought to be related to the limited copy number of firing factors. Here, we present a high (1-kilobase) resolution stochastic model of Saccharomyces cerevisiae whole-genome replication in which origins compete to associate with limited firing factors. After developing an algorithm to fit this model to replication timing data, we validated the model by reproducing experimental inter-origin distances, origin efficiencies, and replication fork directionality. This suggests the model accurately simulates the aspects of DNA replication most important for determining its dynamics. We also use the model to predict measures of DNA replication dynamics which are yet to be determined experimentally and investigate the potential impacts of variations in firing factor concentrations on DNA replication.

Saccharomyces cerevisiae↗

From replicators to reproducers: the first major transitions leading to life.

A classification of replicators is proposed: life depends on replicators that can exist in an indefinitely large number of forms (unlimited heredity), and whose replication is modular rather than processive. The first template replicators would have increased at a rate less than exponential, because of self-inhibition arising from molecular complementarity. The result would be the survival of a varied population of replicators, rather than the victory of one type. This variability was important, because inaccurate copying meant that individual replicators were small (Eigen's paradox). The origin of cooperation between replicators, and the problem of molecular parasites, are discussed. Today, cooperation depends on cellular compartments, and on the linkage of genes on chromosomes, but we argue that at an earlier stage surface metabolism, in which replicators react only with neighbours, was important. The origin of translation and the genetic code is discussed. The essential step is the binding of amino acids to specific oligonucleotides. We suggest that this binding originated, not as a step in protein synthesis, but in the formation of coenzymes in a metabolically complex RNA world. Existing organisms are not replicators (that is, new individuals do not arise by copying), but reproducers that contain replicators. We outline Griesemer's concept of a reproducer, which brings out the essential role of development in evolution.

Animals↗

A model of prebiotic replication: survival of the fittest versus extinction of the unfittest.

A model of prebiotic replication discussed by Szathmary and Maynard Smith (1997) is refined in accordance with Lifson's (1997) theory on the crucial stages in the origin of animate matter. The refined model accounts for two processes associated with replication: (1) Replicators always decompose at some rate. (2) Replicators deplete their reactants at a rate equal to the rate of their own replication. Consequently, replicators and their reactants are linked by a non-linear feedback process that keeps them within limits and leads them toward a steady state. The model suggests that: (a) All competing replicators, including those which replicate at sub-exponential "parabolic" and super-exponential "hyperbolic" rates, are subject to natural selection. (b) Survival/extinction is determined by positive/negative net-replication irrespective of the mechanism of replication. (c) Being fit/unfit is the consequence of survival/extinction rather than its cause. In other words, natural selection and survival of the fit is the outcome of continual extinction of the unfit.

Animals↗