Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “REINFORCEMENT”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,441 records · Page 80Linked to original sources

Effects of drugs that potentiate GABA on extinction of positively-reinforced operant behaviour.

Extinction following positively reinforced operant conditioning reduces response frequency, at least in part through the aversive or frustrative effects of non-reinforcement. According to J.A. Gray's theory, non-reinforcement activates the behavioural inhibition system which in turn causes anxiety. As predicted, anxiolytic drugs including benzodiazepines affect the operant extinction process. Recent studies have shown that reducing GABA-mediated neurotransmission retards extinction of aversive conditioning. We have shown in a series of studies that anxiolytic compounds that potentiate GABA facilitate extinction of positively reinforced fixed-ratio operant behaviour in C57B1/6 male mice. This effect does not occur in the early stages of extinction, nor is it dependent on cumulative effects of the compound administered. Potentiation of GABA at later stages has the effect of increasing sensitivity to the extinction contingency and facilitates the inhibition of the behaviour that is no longer required. The GABAergic hypnotic, zolpidem, has the same selective effects on operant extinction in this procedure. The effects of zolpidem are not due to sedative action. There is evidence across our series of experiments that different GABA-A subtype receptors are involved in extinction facilitation and anxiolysis. Consequently, this procedure may not be an appropriate model for anxiolytic drug action, but it may be a useful technique for analysing the neural bases of extinction and designing therapeutic interventions in humans where failure to extinguish inappropriate behaviours can lead to pathological conditions such as post-traumatic stress disorder.

Animals↗

Effects of amphetamine, dexfenfluramine, diazepam, and dietary manipulations on responding reinforced by stimuli paired with food in nonhuman primates.

The purpose of this study was to determine how stimuli paired with food alters the effects of pharmacological and dietary manipulations on food intake. Responding of baboons was studied using a schedule of reinforcement that simulated food 'seeking' and food 'taking'. Under one condition, responding during the initial seeking component was reinforced by flashing lights that were paired with food delivery during the latter-taking component. Under another condition, responding during seeking components was reinforced by a 1-s time out that was paired with food delivery during the latter-taking component. Dexfenfluramine (DFEN) decreased responding within seeking and taking components under both conditions. Diazepam (DZP) increased responding within seeking and taking components under both conditions. Amphetamine (AMPH) increased responding within seeking components under the flashing-light condition, but did not alter responding within seeking components under the 1-s time-out condition. AMPH decreased responding within taking components under both conditions. As observed with AMPH, caloric prefeeding also increased responding within seeking components only under the flashing-light condition. As observed with DZP, acute deprivation also increased responding within seeking and taking components under both conditions. The effects of AMPH and caloric prefeeding on food seeking are dependent upon the type of stimuli, paired with primary reinforcement.

Amphetamine↗

Wistar Kyoto rats exhibit reduced sucrose pellet reinforcement behavior and intravenous nicotine self-administration.

A phenotype of heightened anxiety-like behavior is hypothesized to be associated with altered reinforcement behavior. To test this hypothesis, we studied patterns of sucrose pellet intake and intravenous nicotine self-administration in animals that exhibit anxiety-like behavior at baseline, Wistar Kyoto (WKY) rats, as compared to normal controls (Wistar rats). WKY rats exhibited significantly reduced sucrose pellet self-administration behavior as assessed by both fixed and progressive ratio schedules of reinforcement and exhibited significantly reduced self-administration of intravenous nicotine. On the basis of previously published findings, we hypothesize that altered mesolimbic dopamine responses, as well as heightened HPA axis functioning, may account for reduced nicotine self-administration and sucrose pellet reinforcement responding in WKY rats. These studies highlight the role of heightened anxiety-like behavior, resulting from the genetic background of the animal, in altering behavioral responses to reinforcing stimuli.

Animals↗

Reinforcing and aversive effects of caffeine measured by flavor preference conditioning in caffeine-naive and caffeine-acclimated rats.

Literature on the stimulus properties of caffeine in rats and humans has described both reinforcing and aversive effects. But some disagreement exists regarding whether caffeine is an effective positive reinforcer for caffeine-naive individuals, and how its stimulus properties change with habitual consumption. These experiments measured the reinforcing/aversive effects of caffeine for rats across a range of concentrations, assayed by conditioned aversion or preference for caffeine-paired flavors, and investigated changes in preference/aversion after extensive prior consumption. In the first two experiments, caffeine-naive rats were trained in sessions alternating daily between a distinctly flavored palatable solution (CS+) containing caffeine (0.07-0.25 mg/ml, yielding actual doses of approximately 4-31 mg/kg bodyweight) and a differently flavored palatable solution (CS-) without caffeine. In post-conditioning two-bottle choice tests between the CS+ and CS- flavors a clear preference/aversion function was apparent across the range of doses. In a third experiment, extensive acclimation to daily caffeine consumption prior to flavor-caffeine pairing significantly altered the preference/aversion function, apparently by reducing the aversiveness of higher doses, not increasing reinforcement by a low dose. These experiments provide additional evidence for an inherent reinforcing effect for naive rats, and also an effect of prior caffeine consumption history.

Animals↗

Late vaccination reinforcement during a measles epidemic in Niamey, Niger (2003-2004).

Low measles vaccination coverage (VC) leads to recurrent epidemics in many African countries. We describe VC before and after late reinforcement of vaccination activities during a measles epidemic in Niamey, Niger (2003-2004) assessed by Lot Quality Assurance Sampling (LQAS). Neighborhoods of Niamey were grouped into 46 lots based on geographic proximity and population homogeneity. Before reinforcement activities, 96% of lots had a VC below 70%. After reinforcement, this proportion fell to 78%. During the intervention 50% of children who had no previous record of measles vaccination received their first dose (vaccination card or parental recall). Our results highlight the benefits and limitations of vaccine reinforcement activities performed late in the epidemic.

Child, Preschool↗

The amphetamine-like reinforcing effect and mechanism of L-deprenyl on conditioned place preference in mice.

The present study investigated the reinforcing effect of L-deprenyl on conditioned place preference in mice and its mechanism. Conditioned place preference was induced by 10 and 25 mg/kg L-deprenyl in a dose-dependent fashion during five consecutive conditioning days, and its reinforcing property was about five-fold less potent than that of L-amphetamine. Pretreatment with the dopamine antagonist, haloperidol (1 mg/kg i.p.), effectively blocked the place preference produced by L-deprenyl (10 and 25 mg/kg i.p.) and L-amphetamine (2 and 5 mg/kg i.p.), but haloperidol itself produced no place aversion. The neurotoxin, 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP), 30 mg/kg did not modify the place preference induced by both L-deprenyl and L-amphetamine, though the dopamine concentration in striata assayed by high performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection (HPLC-EC) was significantly reduced. These results suggest that L-deprenyl has amphetamine-like reinforcing properties. The reinforcing effect of L-deprenyl may be mediated by central dopaminergic neuronal systems, while the nigrostriatal dopaminergic pathway is not involved.

1-Methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine↗

Evidence that oral and nutrient reinforcers differentially condition appetitive and consummatory responses to flavors.

Rats tend to increase their intake of a flavor that has previously been paired with either sweet taste or with caloric repletion. However, it is unclear whether such a change in intake is caused by changes in appetitive behaviors such as orienting and approach, or changes in consummatory behaviors and oral responsiveness. Also, it is unclear whether oral reinforcers (sweetness) and postingestive reinforcers (nutrients) lead to the same kinds of behavioral change. In the current experiments, weanling rats with oral and gastric cannulas repeatedly experienced a flavor paired with either sweetness, high caloric density, or neither. Rats were then tested for differences in appetitive olfactory orienting and consummatory oral responsiveness elicited by the flavor. Results suggest that oral reinforcement (sweetness) produces conditioning of appetitive responding to the flavor, while postingestive reinforcement produces conditioning of consummatory responding. A second experiment indicates that these behavioral changes are specific increases in responsiveness conditioned by flavor + unconditioned stimulus (US) pairing, and are unlikely to be nonspecific effects of daily unconditioned stimulus exposure.

Animals↗

A comparison of the reinforcing efficacy of alcohol in alcohol-preferring (P) and alcohol-nonpreferring (NP) rats.

A key feature of the selective breeding program that produced alcohol-preferring (P) and alcohol-nonpreferring (NP) rats is that the alcohol was mixed with water. However, humans typically drink sweetened or palatably flavored alcohol. The experiments in this study tested whether the differences in P and NP rats generalize to sweetened alcohol. In Experiment 1, P rats drank more alcohol than NP rats when the vehicle was water, but NP rats drank about as much alcohol as P rats (1.1 to 1.3 g/kg/30 min) when the vehicle was a saccharin solution. Experiment 2 tested whether P rats were more susceptible to the rewarding properties of sweetened alcohol than were NP rats. The criterion for reward strength was the degree to which alcohol-reinforced lever pressing persisted, despite increases in the schedule requirements for the alcohol reward. In baseline, lever presses were reinforced with sweetened alcohol and an isocaloric Polycose solution according to two, concurrent, variable-interval 5-s schedules. In subsequent conditions, the interval schedule for alcohol was increased, and then, after a return to baseline, the interval schedule for Polycose was increased. By the criterion of resistance to change, alcohol was a stronger reinforcer than was Polycose, and alcohol was a stronger reinforcer in NP rats than in P rats.

Alcohol Drinking↗

Intra-VTA baclofen attenuates cocaine self-administration on a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement.

The effect of microinjections of baclofen into the ventral tegmental area (VTA), nucleus accumbens, or striatum on cocaine self-administration reinforced on a progressive ratio schedule was investigated. Intra-VTA baclofen produced the most potent modulation of cocaine intake, causing a significant reduction in cocaine-reinforced break points at a dose (56 ng/side) that was substantially lower than doses necessary to produce comparable reductions in the nucleus accumbens or striatum. During the time that cocaine-reinforced responding was suppressed, rats demonstrated the capacity to complete several hundred responses on a concurrently available food-reinforced lever, indicating that the effect of baclofen on cocaine intake was not due to a generalized disruption in operant responding. The results indicate that GABA(B) receptors in the VTA may have the potential to modulate reward processes associated with cocaine use.

Animals↗

Acute reinforcing effects of low-dose nicotine nasal spray in humans.

Tobacco smoking behavior is reinforced by nicotine intake, but there has been little human research examining self-administration of nicotine per se, isolated from tobacco. In this study, 10 smokers (5 men, 5 women) who wanted to quit smoking sampled 0 (placebo), 0.75, and 1.5 ug/kg/spray nicotine via nasal spray during separate lab sessions before engaging in a free choice session, involving ad lib access to all three spray doses. Subjects also ad lib smoked during another session. For the group as a whole, neither nicotine spray dose was self-administered significantly more than placebo during the free choice session, suggesting low abuse potential. However, 4 of 10 subjects self-administered 1.5 ug/kg/spray on more than 50% of all sprays (vs. 33% chance) and were designated nicotine "choosers," while the others were "nonchoosers." Choosers responded to initial nicotine spray exposure during sampling sessions with greater positive subjective effects (similar to their responses to tobacco smoking), smoked more during the ad lib smoking session (i.e., self-administered more nicotine via tobacco smoking), and tended to be more heavily dependent smokers. They did not report greater withdrawal relief or less aversive effects from nicotine, suggesting their greater nicotine choice reflected greater positive reinforcement rather than negative reinforcement. These results are consistent with the few existing studies demonstrating that acute nicotine intake per se, in the absence of tobacco, may be reinforcing in some smokers.

Administration, Inhalation↗

Amphetamine-induced disruption of latent inhibition is not reinforcer-mediated.

Latent inhibition (LI) refers to retarded conditioning to a stimulus that had been repeatedly preexposed without consequences, as compared with a nonpreexposed stimulus. Amphetamine disrupts LI, and this effect was suggested to result from enhanced switching to respond according to the stimulus-reinforcer contingency. Recently, it has been argued that amphetamine disrupts LI by increasing the impact of the reinforcer. This implies that amphetamine should produce stronger conditioning in the nonpreexposed group and that its influence on LI can be modified only by changing reinforcer parameters. We report two studies, using an off-baseline conditioned emotional response procedure in rats licking for water, that question both predictions. In the first study, a meta-analysis based on 23 replications of the effect of amphetamine on LI, using tone as the preexposed stimulus, showed that LI is significantly attenuated due to drug-induced increased suppression in the preexposed groups only. The second study included two experiments, each using two shock intensities but different preexposed stimuli. Amphetamine disrupted LI at both shock intensities when the stimulus was a steady light, but this effect disappeared when the stimulus was three flashing lights. Thus, the effect of amphetamine could not be modified by manipulating shock intensity, but was modifiable by manipulating the nature of the preexposed stimulus. The results are inconsistent with the hypothesis that amphetamine-induced disruption of LI is solely mediated by drug-induced changes in the effects of reinforcers.

Animals↗

A critique of fixed and progressive ratio schedules used to examine the neural substrates of drug reinforcement.

This paper is a critique of fixed and progressive ratio schedules used to examine the neural substrates of cocaine reinforcement. The discussion focuses on problems encountered while examining the effects of neurotoxic lesions and pharmacological pretreatments on cocaine reinforcement. We review the theoretical and interpretational problems associated with the use of the fixed ratio (FR) schedules that have been used in the majority of studies, and we conclude that rate of drug intake cannot directly address the issue of increased or decreased reinforcer efficacy. The progressive ratio (PR) schedule offers some advantages over FR schedules, although it is now clear that the same implementation cannot be applied across all drug classes. It is likely that the motivation to self-administer psychostimulant vs. opiate drugs is qualitatively different. We conclude that there is no single schedule that can quantify all aspects of drug reinforcement and that behavioral paradigms will need to be adapted according to the particular question under study.

Animals↗

Gender differences in the reinforcing properties of morphine.

The purpose of the present studies was to examine whether gender differences could be observed in an important aspect of morphine's pharmacology: its reinforcing properties. Our results showed that morphine served as a positive reinforcing agent in both male and female rats in a place conditioning paradigm, but that the dose-response curves displayed marked sex-related differences. At doses from 0.2 up to 10.0 mg/kg, morphine induced an equally strong preference for the drug-associated chamber in males and females. However, as the dose was increased from 10-17.5 mg/kg, morphine ceased to act as a positive reinforcer in males. In contrast, a very strong preference for the morphine-associated chamber was still observed in females at doses up to 30 mg/kg. No gender differences in the blood and brain levels of morphine were observed subsequent to morphine administration during the conditioning phase, suggesting that pharmacokinetic factors were not involved in the sex-related differences observed. Consequently, these results suggest that there are intrinsic sex-linked differences in the doses of morphine that can induce a preference for the drug-associated chamber in a place-conditioning paradigm that are most likely related to differences in the sensitivity of the central nervous system to morphine's reinforcing properties in males and females.

Animals↗

Dopamine, neuroleptics and reinforced behavior.

Animals working for any one of a variety of positive reinforcers (food, water, brain-stimulation...) produce dramatic decrements in operant performance when challenged with dopamine antagonist neuroleptic drugs. This well-established fact has generated considerable research aimed at identifying the precise nature of the drug-induced behavioral impairment. The two most oft-cited hypotheses suggest that much of the reduction in operant responding can be accounted for by either an "anhedonic" or "motoric" consequence of dopamine antagonism. Several novel behavioral paradigms are described which were devised to more clearly elucidate both the motor and reward impairing qualities of neuroleptic agents. Motor performance was assessed in a food-reinforced task in which a computer-operated force-transducer was used to obtain detailed analyses of the biophysical properties of operant responding. These studies suggested that neuroleptics impair the temporal nature (i.e., "timing") of normal operant behavior and not the physical capacity of the animals (i.e., the ability to emit "force"). This identification of a robust "slowing" effect of neuroleptic challenge, suggested that the investigation of putative "reward" impairments should best be conducted with behavioral paradigms in which the test data are collected from undrugged animals. Three such paradigms are described: a partial reinforcement extinction test, an incentive motivation test, and a conditioned place preference test. To date, our results suggest that when motor confounds are avoided, dopamine antagonist drugs can still produce patterns of operant behavior that very closely resemble those observed with actual reductions in reward magnitude. Such data provide support for the contention that central dopaminergic substrates play a role in the neurobiology of positive reinforcement.

Animals↗

The partial reinforcement extinction effect in humans: effects of schizophrenia, schizotypy and low doses of amphetamine.

The partial reinforcement extinction effect (PREE) was studied in human subjects. It has been suggested that the PREE depends on neural mechanisms critical to the cognitive dysfunction which underlines acute schizophrenia. We therefore predicted that the PREE should be reduced, through decreased resistance to extinction in the partial reinforcement (PR) condition, in various types of individual: (a) healthy volunteers given low doses of oral amphetamine; (b) those in the acute (but not chronic) phase of a schizophrenic illness and; (c) healthy volunteers with high scores on personality measures of schizotypy. Despite obtaining robust demonstrations of PREE in all experiments, none of these predictions were confirmed. A single, low dose, of amphetamine had no effect on either continuous reinforcement (CR) or partial reinforcement (PR). Acute and chronic schizophrenic patients showed a reduced PREE compared to controls. However this was due to increased resistance to extinction in the CR groups. Finally, high schizotypy scores were associated with greater PREE, attributable to both decreased extinction in the CR condition and increased extinction in the PR condition. The results of these experiments on human PREE provide no support that PREE is a valid paradigm with which to explore the cognitive dysfunction underlying schizophrenia.

Acute Disease↗

WIN 55,212-2 decreases the reinforcing actions of cocaine through CB1 cannabinoid receptor stimulation.

CB(1) cannabinoid receptor agonists show a different profile compared to other drugs of abuse on the basis of experimental data that reveal their reinforcing properties. Thus, there are controversial data in the literature concerning the ability of CB(1) receptor agonists to reinforce behavioral responses in experimental animals, i.e. to lower self-stimulation thresholds, and to support self-administration or conditioned place preference. The aim of the present study was to examine the effects of WIN 55,212-2, a potent CB(1) receptor agonist (graded doses 0.1, 0.3, 1 mg/kg, i.p.), on the rewarding efficacy of lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation and on the systemic cocaine-induced potentiation of brain-stimulation reward. WIN 55,212-2 did not affect lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation thresholds both in drug nai;ve rats and in rats pretreated with the drug, whereas it produced a significant, dose-dependent decrease in the maximal rate of responding, i.e. in the performance of the animals. Cocaine (5.0 mg/kg, i.p.) produced a significant reduction in self-stimulation threshold, without altering maximal rates of responding. Importantly, WIN 55,212-2 attenuated the effect of cocaine at the two higher doses tested. The effects of the CB(1) receptor agonist were reversed by pretreatment with the selective CB(1) receptor antagonist SR 141716A (0.02 mg/kg, i.p.) that did not by itself affect cocaine's action. These results indicate that acute stimulation of CB(1) receptors per se does not affect baseline self-stimulation, but reduces the reinforcing effects induced by cocaine. Taken together these findings suggest that cannabinoids may interfere with brain-reward systems responsible for the expression of acute reinforcing properties of drugs of abuse, such as cocaine, and provide evidence that the cannabinoid system could be an interesting drug discovery and development target for the treatment of drug addiction.

Algorithms↗

Mother rats bar-press for pups: effects of lesions of the mpoa and limbic sites on maternal behavior and operant responding for pup-reinforcement.

This series of studies explored the operant response rates for pup-reinforcement of female Sprague Dawley rats that were either postpartum or cycling and sustained lesions of the medial preoptic area (mpoa), the lateral amygdala, the nucleus accumbens, or sham lesions. The last experiment tested the effects on operant responding of preventing direct access to pups in mpoa and sham-lesioned postpartum mothers. All animals were trained prior to mating on an FR-1 bar-press schedule to criterion (50 presses in 30 min) for a food (Froot Loops) reward in an operant chamber. At the end of pregnancy animals that were to be tested postpartum were provided in their home cages with six newborn foster pups; mother-litter interactions were observed on the last 3 days of pregnancy and throughout the postpartum period. On each of these same days after a period of separation from pups, females were tested in the operant box for delivery of rat pups. With each bar-press response, a rat pup rather than a Fruit Loop was delivered down a gentle shoot into the hopper. Non-postpartum, but maternal, multiparous animals who were showing estrous cycles were tested using the same procedures. The first and second studies showed that animals (both postpartum and as cycling multiparous animals) with mpoa lesions exhibited a significant reduction in bar-press rate for pup reinforcement in the operant box. In postpartum animals, amygdala lesions also produced a bar-press deficit, whereas nucleus accumbens lesions did not. All lesioned groups showed deficits in maternal responding in the home cage and deficits in retrieval in the operant box. These results indicate that systems associated with the mpoa mediate both the stereotypical maternal behaviors and pup-reinforcement. In contrast, the expression of home cage maternal behavior is dependent on the integrity of both the amygdala and nucleus accumbens, whereas operant responding need not be. These results indicate a dissociation of mechanisms mediating expression of the species-typical maternal behavior and pup-reinforcement.

Amygdala↗

Localization of brain reinforcement mechanisms: intracranial self-administration and intracranial place-conditioning studies.

Intracranial self-administration (ICSA) and intracranial place conditioning (ICPC) methodologies have been mainly used to study drug reward mechanisms, but they have also been applied toward examining brain reward mechanisms. ICSA studies in rodents have established that the ventral tegmental area (VTA) is a site supporting morphine and ethanol reinforcement. ICPC studies confirmed that injection of morphine into the VTA produces conditioned place preference (CPP). Further confirmation that activation of opioid receptors within the VTA is reinforcing comes from the findings that the endogenous opioid peptide met-enkephalin injected into the VTA produces CPP, and that the mu- and delta-opioid agonists, DAMGO and DPDPE, are self-infused into the VTA. Activation of the VTA dopamine (DA) system may produce reinforcing effects in general because (a) neurotensin is self-administered into the VTA, and injection of neurotensin into the VTA produces CPP and enhances DA release in the nucleus accumbens (NAC), and (b) GABA(A) antagonists are self-administered into the anterior VTA and injections of GABA(A) antagonists into the anterior VTA enhance DA release in the NAC. The NAC also appears to have a major role in brain reward mechanisms, whereas most data from ICSA and ICPC studies do not support an involvement of the caudate-putamen in reinforcement processes. Rodents will self-infuse a variety of drugs of abuse (e.g. amphetamine, morphine, phencyclidine and cocaine) into the NAC, and this occurs primarily in the shell region. ICPC studies also indicate that injection of amphetamine into the shell portion of the NAC produces CPP. Activation of the DA system within the shell subregion of the NAC appears to play a key role in brain reward mechanisms. Rats will ICSA the DA uptake blocker, nomifensine, into the NAC shell; co-infusion with a D2 antagonist can block this behavior. In addition, rats will self-administer a mixture of a D1 plus a D2 agonist into the shell, but not the core, region of the NAC. The ICSA of this mixture can be blocked with the co-infusion of either a D1 or a D2 antagonist. However, the interactions of other transmitter systems within the NAC may also play key roles because NMDA antagonists and the muscarinic agonist carbachol are self-infused into the NAC. The medial prefrontal (MPF) cortex supports the ICSA of cocaine and phencyclidine. The DA system also seems to play a role in this behavior since cocaine self-infusion into the MPF cortex can be blocked by co-infusing a D2 antagonist, or with 6-OHDA lesions of the MPF cortex. Limited studies have been conducted on other CNS regions to elucidate their role in brain and drug reward mechanisms using ICSA or ICPC procedures. Among these regions, ICPC findings suggest that cocaine and amphetamine are rewarding in the rostral ventral pallidum (VP); ICSA and ICPC studies indicate that morphine is rewarding in the dorsal hippocampus, central gray and lateral hypothalamus. Finally, substance P mediated systems within the caudal VP (nucleus basalis magnocellularis) and serotonin systems of the dorsal and median raphe nuclei may also be important anatomical components involved in brain reward mechanisms. Overall, the ICSA and ICPC studies indicate that there are a number of receptors, neuronal pathways, and discrete CNS sites involved in brain reward mechanisms.

Animals↗